Skip to main content
PMC home page
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2019 Sep 26;24(19):3502. doi: 10.3390/molecules24193502

Structural Evaluation and Electrophysiological Effects of Some Kynurenic Acid Analogs

Evelin Fehér 1,2,†, István Szatmári 3,4,5,†, Tamás Dudás 2, Anna Zalatnai 2, Tamás Farkas 2,*, Bálint Lőrinczi 3,4, Ferenc Fülöp 3,4,5, László Vécsei 1,6, József Toldi 2
Editor: Tomasz Tuzimski
PMCID: PMC6803921  PMID: 31561643

Abstract

Kynurenic acid (KYNA), a metabolite of tryptophan, as an excitatory amino acid receptor antagonist is an effective neuroprotective agent in case of excitotoxicity, which is the hallmark of brain ischemia and several neurodegenerative processes. Therefore, kynurenine pathway, KYNA itself, and its derivatives came into the focus of research. During the past fifteen years, our research group has developed several neuroactive KYNA derivatives, some of which proved to be neuroprotective in preclinical studies. In this study, the synthesis of these KYNA derivatives and their evaluation with divergent molecular characteristics are presented together with their most typical effects on the monosynaptic transmission in CA1 region of the hippocampus of the rat. Their effects on the basic neuronal activity (on the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials: fEPSP) were studied in in vitro hippocampal slices in 1 and 200 μM concentrations. KYNA and its derivative 4 in both 1 and 200 μM concentrations proved to be inhibitory, while derivative 8 only in 200 μM decreased the amplitudes of fEPSPs. Derivative 5 facilitated the fEPSPs in 200 μM concentration. This is the first comparative study which evaluates the structural and functional differences of formerly and newly developed KYNA analogs. Considerations on possible relations between molecular structures and their physiological effects are presented.

Keywords: kynurenic acid, Mannich reaction, neuroprotection, excitatory amino acid receptors

1. Introduction

Glutamate is the main excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS) that acts both on ionotropic and metabotropic receptors. The excessive glutamate level results in excitotoxicity which is the hallmark of several neurodegenerative processes. Excitotoxicity may result from acute events like stroke or traumatic brain injury [1,2,3]. On the other hand, it plays a role in several neurological diseases [4].

In case of high glutamate level, the receptors of excitatory amino acids (EAARs) such as N-methyl-d-aspartate ionotropic glutamate receptor (NMDAR), alfa-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPAR), and kainate receptors are overactivated, leading to neuronal damage. The overactivation of these receptors can lead to dysregulation of Ca2+ homeostasis, triggering the production of free radicals, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunctions, and finally cell death [5]. The NMDAR is a ligand-gated ion channel that plays an outstanding role in these pathological processes; therefore, it is a potential therapeutic target [6].

Several preclinical studies showed that the attenuation of excitotoxicity may be achieved by blockage of EAARs such as NMDAR [7,8,9,10]. Although it is clear that NMDAR antagonists, such as MK-801, prevents excitotoxicity [11,12], their clinical use is very limited, as a complete NMDAR blockade resulting from their usage can cause serious side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and memory impairment [13]. Additionally, NMDAR blockers may produce psychosis and symptoms of schizophrenia in humans, while in laboratory animals it can induce ataxia and stereotypy [14,15,16]. However, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NR2B) subunit-specific antagonists glycine (Gly) and polyamine site agents and ion channel blockers with low affinity got into the focus of research, as they have attenuated the side effects [17]. This was the reason why kynurenic acid (KYNA), an intermediate of the tryptophan metabolism [18,19], also came into the interest of researchers. KYNA is the only known endogenous NMDAR blocker (beside Mg2+) that also has broad-spectrum targets: it inhibits NMDARs at Gly-binding site [20] and it can noncompetitively inhibit α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [21], and through this, it can moderate Glu release presynaptically [22]. KYNA has been proposed as the endogenous agonist of G protein-coupled receptor 35 (GPR35), a Gi-protein receptor [23], and a nuclear receptor, called aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) [24]. In addition to the direct effects of KYNA on glutamatergic neurotransmission, an indirect inverse regulation between striatal KYNA and dopamine (DA) levels has also been raised [25].

Reviewing the wide spectrum of effects of KYNA, it can be concluded that KYNA proved to be a neuroprotective substance in most preclinical studies [26,27,28]. This has stimulated the intense study of KYNA itself and of its derivatives, design, and development of new KYNA analogs, prodrugs, and derivatives [18,29,30].

More than fifteen years ago, our research group also started to develop new KYNA derivatives. One of our molecules (4), a KYNA amide derivative N-(N’,N’-dimethylaminoethyl)-4-hydroxy-4-quinoline-2-carboxamide hydrochloride), showed electrophysiological properties similar to KYNA in in vitro studies [31], proved to be protective in a transgenic animal model of Huntington’s disease [32] and also in many other preclinical studies [33,34,35,36].

In this article, the synthesis of neuroactive KYNA derivatives and their basic electrophysiological effects studied in in vitro are presented. The tests were carried out in normal artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF).

2. Results

2.1. Design and Development of KYNA Derivatives

The synthesis of the precursor ethyl 4-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxylate (3) has already been published [37]. During that process, aniline was reacted with diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate, forming the intermediate enamine. In the second ring-closing reaction in diphenyl ether at 250 °C led to the formation of the ethyl ester in an overall yield of 58%. In our case, the following optimizations were applied: (i) After the formation of the enamine 2, column chromatography was used to purify the intermediate; (ii) Diphenyl-ether was replaced by 1,2-dichlorobenzene that has lower boiling point (190 °C) allowing an easier work-up procedure. These latter conditions led to the formation of 3 in an overall yield of 67% (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

Syntheses of KYNA ethyl ester.

Compounds 4, 5 were synthesized by direct amidation of the ethyl ester of KYNA (3) with N1,N1-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (to achieve 4) or with N1,N1-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine (to achieve 5) (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Open in a new tab

Syntheses of KYNA amide derivatives.

As previous studies indicated, the addition of a proton acceptable nitrogen is preferable for better biological activity [38]. This can be achieved either through amidation using amines containing tertiary nitrogen (Scheme 2), or via modified Mannich reaction (mMR) by using secondary amine derivatives. It has been suspected that the presence of multiple cationic centers together will contribute to the biological effect with greater magnitude. Thus, the syntheses of 7 and 8 containing two such functional groups were planned in a step by step synthetic pathway (Scheme 3). First, the synthesis of 6 was carried out. During the aminoalkylation of 3, morpholine as a representative secondary cyclic amine with formaldehyde was used to form the iminium salt that would attack the C-3 position on the KYNA skeleton. Afterward, the amidations of 6 were achieved in dimethylformamide through the activation of the free carboxylic group with N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC). During the reactions, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBt) was also used to achieve an active-ester intermediate and further improve the yield (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Open in a new tab

Syntheses of aminoalkylated KYNA amide derivatives.

2.2. Electrophysiology

Schaffer collateral-stimulation results in field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) in the pyramidal layer of region CA1 of the hippocampus with 0.5–0.8 mV amplitudes (Figure 1A, inset). Administration of KYNA or the presented KYNA derivatives in 200 μM concentration resulted in either decrease or increase in the amplitudes of the fEPSPs. KYNA derivatives (except 4 and 5) applied in 1 μM concentration induced less unequivocal and significant changes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effect of KYNA and 4 (one of its derivatives) on the field excitatory evoked potentials (fEPSPs) recorded in CA1 region of hippocampus. A: KYNA administration (in 200 µM concentration) for 30 min resulted in decrease of the fEPSPs’ amplitudes reversibly. During wash-out, the amplitudes not only recovered but also were facilitated in the recorded period (arrow) *: samples for the baseline were taken during the last 5 min of control period. #: samples for calculation of the effect were taken during the last 5 min of wash-in period. Inset: an original fEPSP. Amplitudes were measured from ‘a’ to ‘b’. Calibration: 20 ms and 0.5 mV. B: dose-dependent responses to KYNA and 4 in concentrations 1 µM, 16 µM, and 200 µM, respectively. In case of KYNA, n = 7 at 1 μM and 16 μM and n = 10 at 200 μM. In case of 4 n = 10 at 1 μM and 16 μM and n = 8 at 200 μM.

Following the control period, an immediate decrease in fEPSP amplitudes could be detected at the wash-in period of KYNA (200 μM) (Figure 1A). The maximal reduction was 25%–30% compared to controls, which lasted until the end of wash-in (Figure 1A). During wash-out period, amplitudes started to rise immediately, and after 20–25 min, they became stable, showing a 6%–8% increase compared to the controls (arrow in Figure 1A). KYNA and 4 (a KYNA amide), both in 1 µM and 200 µM concentrations, resulted in significant decrease in the amplitude (Figure 2 KYNA and compound 4). To show the effect of 4 in comparison with KYNA in more detailed, dose–effect relations are presented (Figure 1B). The effect of 5 is fundamentally different. Its administration at 200 μM concentration resulted in 15%–25% facilitation of fEPSPs amplitudes, while in 1 μM concentration its effect was slightly inhibitory (Figure 2, compound 5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Structure and molecular weight of KYNA and of its derivatives (4, 5, 7, 8), respectively, together with their effects on the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) recorded in CA1 region of hippocampus. Control (c) was observed during the last 5 min of resting period, before administration of a compound (* in Figure 1A). Effect on the amplitudes of fEPSPs was observed during the last 5 min of wash-in periods, respectively (# in Figure 1A). Each slice was subjected to only one measurement. Changes in fEPSP amplitudes (mean ± SEM) due to application of KYNA or of its analogs are shown in the bar graphs. The numbers of measurements (N) are indicated in the columns; n.s. = p > 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).

Though the structures of 7 and 8 are similar to each other, their effects are different. Administration of 7 in 200 μM concentration induced a slight increase in the amplitudes of fEPSPs during the wash-in period, while in 1 μM, it had a weak inhibitory effect, but none of them proved to be significant (Figure 2, compound 7). In case of 8, the results acquired during the administration were not stable. In most cases it (in 200 μM) resulted in a serious decrease in amplitudes (to 60% of controls, e.g., Figure 2, compound 8), and in few cases, the inhibitory effect of 8 was smaller. In 1 μM concentration, it had hardly any effect.

3. Discussion

A mass of early results from other laboratories [39,40,41] and our own previous studies demonstrated that neuroprotection can be achieved not only with KYNA but also by administration of either kynurenine (KYN, the prodrug of KYNA) or KYNA derivatives [10,26,42,43,44,45]. During the past one and half decade, we have made great efforts to develop new KYNA derivatives which are neuroactive (and hopefully protective in such pathological states as ischemia or in the models of different neurological diseases) [28,30,46].

In this study, we focused on four neuroactive KYNA derivatives; keeping in mind the structure of molecules and the effects of substances on the neuronal transmission in a relatively simple monosynaptic preparation (Schaffer collateral/commissural pathway - pyramidal cells). The induced fEPSPs well demonstrate the neural signaling, in which mainly NMDA and AMPA receptors are involved [47,48].

The electrophysiological studies were carried out both in lower and higher concentrations (1 and 200 μM, respectively). While KYNA and 4 decreased the amplitudes effectively in both concentrations, the effect of derivatives 5, 7, and 8 in 1 μM concentration was insignificant. In this study, we focused on the 200 μM concentration because in another series of experiments, aiming to study the phenomenon of neuroprotection, that concentration was used. KYNA administration resulted in reduction in amplitudes of fEPSPs, which can be well explained by its binding to the strychnine-insensitive glycine binding site of the NMDA receptor [20]. After KYNA application, during the wash-out period, the fEPSPs not only recovered but they were also augmented. Looking for explanation, one can think of the results of Prescott et al., who found that KYNA has a dual action on AMPA receptors [49]. Similarly, we found that KYNA has a Janus-faced effect on fEPSPs; in micromolar range it has inhibitory, while in nanomolar range it has facilitatory effect [50]. This might be based on that during the wash-out period the KYNA concentration gradually decreased to nanomolar range.

The phenomenon was true for 4 as well; significant decrease in amplitudes of fEPSPs was observed during its administration in all studied concentrations. To demonstrate the similar inhibitory properties of KYNA and 4, their dose-dependent responses were presented (Figure 1B). Similar result was published by Marosi et al. [31]. 4 was our firstly synthesized KYNA amide, effective as an inhibitor of fEPSPs in in vitro studies, and it proved to be outstandingly effective in earlier studies of neuroprotection [31,32,43,51]. It was effective also in systemic administration, which suggests that 4 might penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) much more effectively than KYNA [30]. It can be explained by the molecular structure of 4 as it has a side chain containing cationic center that may help the penetration through the BBB and through the creation of hydrochloride salt it can grant water solubility.

Contrary to the small structural difference (5 differs from 4 only in a -CH2- in the side chain), the effect of 5 is fundamentally different; its administration (in 200 μM) did not induce inhibition of fEPSPs but facilitated the amplitudes (Figure 2, compound 5). Similar results were also found in the early tests of these molecules made on anesthetized animals [30].

The difference between the molecular structures of 7, 8 and 4, 5 is that the latter compounds are unsubstituted at position 3, while 7 and 8 are aminoalkylated at C-3 of the KYNA skeleton. Though 7 and 8 have similar structure (the only difference between the two molecules is the cationic center of the amide side chain), their effects (in 200 μM) were fundamentally different; 7 resulted in a slight but insignificant facilitation while 8 in most cases induced a marked inhibition of fEPSP amplitudes (Figure 2, compounds 7 and 8).

Although it is hard to discuss comprehensive correlations between structure and biological effects, we could determine certain structural changes leading to different biological activity. Compound 4, as previously investigated, shows similar effect as KYNA; however, the insertion of an additional -CH2-group in the amide sidechain (compound 5) resulted in an antagonist effect. Similar results were observed during the evaluation of compound 7 that bears the amide sidechain of 4 and an additional aminoalkyl group at C-3. These results mean that the insertion of an additional cationic center at position 3 has a characteristic influence on the electrophysiological effects.

The explanation of the phenomenon is not clear. Probably, it cannot be elucidated simply with the binding to the synaptic AMPA- and/or NMDA receptors. It is known that beside the synaptic glutamatergic receptors, perisynaptic and extrasynaptic receptors exist, which are distinct from each other [52,53,54,55]. Basically, according to the subunit composition, in adults, GluN2A subunits of NMDA receptors are predominantly synaptic, GluN2B-containing receptors are mostly extrasynaptic, though it is not true in all cases, for example, GluN2B subunits are also located in synapses in several brain regions [56]. Activation of these extrasynaptic receptors leads to changes in excitability of neurons and take part in several pathological processes like excitotoxicity, neurodegeneration, or neuroinflammation [57]. It might be that the amplitudes’ changes involve different mechanisms.

Our most effective molecules are KYNA amides, which are known to be capable of the selective inhibition of the NR2B subunit-containing NMDA receptors [58]. However, the effects of different neuroactive KYNA derivatives have never been compared keeping in mind their structure. This is the first comparative study which evaluates the structural and functional differences of formerly and newly developed KYNA analogs. Unfortunately, at this moment, we do not know more details about the binding of these molecules to the different synaptic and extrasynaptic glutamatergic receptors, but the results of these preclinical studies are promising, as these KYNA derivatives might be promising candidates for clinical trials.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Drugs

KYNA was from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Compounds (5, 7, 8) in these studies were used at final concentration of 1 and 200 μM, respectively, while KYNA and 4 in concentrations of 1, 16, and 200 μM, dissolved in normal ACSF. The pH of the solutions was continuously monitored and kept at 7.4.

4.2. Synthesis

The 1H and 13C spectra were recorded in DMSO or D2O solutions in 5 mm tubes, at room temperature, with a Bruker spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) at 500 (1H) and 125 (13C) MHz, with the deuterium signal of the solvent as the lock and TMS as internal standard.

Melting points were determined on a Hinotek X-4 melting point apparatus (Ningbo, China). Elemental analyses were performed with a Perkin-Elmer 2400 CHNS elemental analyzer (Waltham, MA, USA). Merck Kieselgel 60F254 plates (Budapest, Hungary) were used for TLC. The microwave reactions were performed with a CEM Discover SP microwave reactor (Matthwes, NC, USA).

4.2.1. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Amides (4, 5)

Ethyl 4-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxylate (3) (1.0 mmol), N1,N1-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (2.0 mmol, to achieve 4), or N1,N1-dimethylpropane-1,3-diamine (2.0 mmol, to achieve 5) were placed in a 50 mL round bottom flask. The mixture was refluxed in 30 mL EtOH for 7–8 h. After the evaporation of the solvent, the residues were crystallized with Et2O (10 mL). The products were dissolved in 15 mL of EtOH and HCl/EtOH (22%) was added until reaching pH = 1. Et2O (10 mL) was added to the solution until precipitation. The crystals were filtered and washed with 2 × 15 mL Et2O yielding 4 or 5, respectively.

N-(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)-4-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxamide hydrochloride (4). Yield: 241 mg (82%); m.p. 150–153 °C. 1H-NMR (D2O); 3.03 (6H, s); 3.50 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz); 3.88 (2H, t, J = 6.1 Hz); 6.80 (1H, s); 7.54 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz); 7.76 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz); 7.83 (1H, t, J = 7.9 Hz); 8.12 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz); 13C-NMR (D2O); 35.3; 43.2; 53.4; 106.8; 119.4; 124.3; 124.7; 125.8; 134.0; 139.4; 141.7; 163.7; 180.3; ppm. C14H18ClN3O2 (295.76): calcd. C, 56.80; H, 6.09; N, 14.20; found C, 56.73; H, 6.08; N, 14.16.

N-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-4-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxamide (5). Yield: 238 mg (77%); m.p. 222–226 °C. 1H-NMR (D2O); 2.09–2.17 (2H, m); 2.95 (6H, s); 3.28 (2H, t, J = 8.6 Hz); 3.57 (2H, t, J = 6.7 Hz); 6.86 (1H, s); 7.58 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz); 7.80 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz); 7.86 (1H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); 8.16 (1H, d, J = 8,3 Hz); 13C-NMR (D2O); 24.0; 37.1; 42.9; 55.4; 106.1; 119.5; 124.1; 124.2; 126.3; 134.3; 139.3; 142.5; 162.9; 179.0 ppm. C15H20ClN3O2 (309.79): calcd. C, 58.10; H, 6.46; N, 13.56; found C, 58.14; H, 6.42; N, 13.53.

4-hydroxy-3-(morpholinomethyl)quinoline-2-carboxylic acid (6). Morpholine (174 mg, 2.0 mmol), ethyl 4-hydroxyquinoline-2-carboxylate (3; 217 mg, 1.0 mmol), 22% aqueous formaldehyde (410 mg, 3.0 mmol), and 30 mL of 1,4-dioxane were placed in a 50 mL round bottom flask. The mixture was refluxed for 6 h. After the evaporation of the solvent, the residue was dissolved in 40 mL water and extracted with 3 × 30 mL of DCM. The collected organic phases were dried (Na2SO4), the solvent was removed by evaporation, and the residue was crystallized from 15 mL n-hexane:EtOAc (4:1) to yield 6. Yield: 196 mg (68%); m.p. 253–256 °C. 1H-NMR (DMSO); 3.16–3.40 (4H, m); 3.66–3.84 (2H, m); 3.84–4.01 (2H, m); 4.56 (2H, s); 7.43 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz); 7.75 (1H, t, J = 7,9 Hz); 8.04 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz); 8.14 (1H, d, J = 7.9 Hz); 10.39 (1H, brs); 12.18 (1H, brs); 13C-NMR (DMSO); 52.0; 52.2; 64.1; 110.7; 120.5; 125.2; 125.5; 125.9; 133.8; 139.9; 143.3; 164.6; 178.2 ppm. C15H16N2O4 (288.30): calcd. C, 62.43; H, 5.55; N, 9.71; found C, 62.38; H, 5.56; N, 9.75.

4.2.2. General Procedure for the Syntheses of Aminoalkylated Amides 7, 8

The 4-hydroxy-3-(morpholinomethyl)quinoline-2-carboxylic acid 6 (1.0 mmol) with N1,N1-dimethylethane-1,2-diamine (2.0 mmol to achieve 7) or 2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)ethanamine (2.0 mmol to achieve 8) were dissolved in DMF (20 mL). The reaction was cooled to −10 °C while HOBt (2.0 mmol) was added and the solution was stirred for 10 min. N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (2.0 mmol) was added. After reaching room temperature, the mixture was stirred for additional 7–10 h. After the evaporation of the solvent, the residue was dissolved in 20 mL DCM and was washed with 2 × 20 mL H2O. The organic phase was dried with Na2SO4 and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was crystallized using Et2O (10 mL) yielding 7 or 8, respectively.

N-(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)-4-hydroxy-3-(morpholinomethyl)quinoline-2-carboxamide (7). Yield: 161 mg (45%); m.p. > 350 °C. 2.19 (6H, s); 2.41–2.48 (6H, m); 3.45–3.52 (2H, m); 3.53–3.59 (4H, m); 3.60 (2H, s) 7.31 (1H, t, J = 7.3 Hz); 7.64 (1H, t, J = 7.7 Hz); 7.86 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz); 8.08 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz); 10.63 (1H, brs); 13C-NMR (DMSO); 38.4; 45.8; 51.0; 52.4; 59.1; 67.0; 113.7; 120.4; 124.4; 124.8; 126.0; 131.0; 132.8; 140.5; 163.9; 177.8; ppm; C19H26N4O3 (358.43): calcd. C, 63.61; H, 7.25; N, 15.62; found C, 63,66; H, 7.26; N, 15.65.

4-hydroxy-3-(morpholinomethyl)-N-(2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)ethyl)quinoline-2-carboxamide (8). Yield: 165 mg (43%); m.p. > 350 °C. 1H-NMR (DMSO); 1.63–1.73 (4H, m); 2.46–2.52 (6H, m); 2.64 (2H, t, J = 6.2 Hz); 3.35–3.41 (2H, m); 3.48–3.63 (8H, m); 7.34 (1H, t, J = 7.1 Hz); 7.66 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz); 7.88 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz); 8.09 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz); 10.82 (1H, brs); 11.78 (1H, brs); 13C-NMR (DMSO); 23.6; 50.6; 52.2; 54.1; 55.4; 66.6; 113.4; 119.6; 124.1; 124.3; 125.7; 132.6; 139.7; 144.2; 163.2; 177.6 ppm; C21H28N4O3 (384.47): calcd. C, 65.54; H, 7.28; N, 14.56; found C, 65.50; H, 7.27; N, 14.55.

4.3. Animals and Housing Conditions

Recordings were made from brain slices taken from 20- to 28-day-old male Wistar rats (N = 62) supplied by Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA, USA). Animals were kept under constant environmental conditions (23 Celsius degree; humidity 55 ± 5%; a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle) and were housed individually in standard plastic cages, where they had free access to food and water. Every effort was made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering. The principles of animal care (NIH publication No. 85–23) and the protocol for animal care approved both by the Hungarian Health Committee (1998) and by the European Communities Council Directive (2010/63/EU) were followed. Ethical license: XX./842/2016. Before the experimental procedures, all the rats were in normal health and had no neurological deficits.

4.4. Slice Preparation

Coronal slices (350 µm), prepared from the middle part of their hippocampi with a vibratome (Leica VT1200S, Wetzlar, Germany), were kept in an ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal solution (ACSF) composed of (in mM) 130 NaCl, 3.5 KCl, 1 NaH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 1 CaCl2, 3 MgSO4, and 10 D-glucose (all from Sigma, Germany), saturated with 95% O2 + 5% CO2. 3 slices were made from the brain of an animal. The slices were then transferred to a slice holder chamber, where they were warmed up to 32 °C shortly, and then kept 19–20 °C until usage to allow the slices to recover in the solution used for recording (differing only in that it contained 3 mM CaCl2 and 1.5 mM MgSO4). The flow rate in the Haas-type recording chamber was 1.5–2 mL/min and the experiments were performed at 34 °C.

4.5. Electrophysiology

In order to obtain orthodromic stimulation of the Schaffer collateral/commissural pathway, the stimulating electrode (a bipolar concentric stainless steel electrode developed by Neuronelektrod Ltd., Hungary) was placed in the stratum radiatum between the CA1 and CA2 regions. The stimulus intensity was adjusted between 20 and 50 µA (constant current, 0.2-ms pulses delivered at 0.05 Hz) to evoke the half-maximal response. Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were recorded with glass micropipettes with a resistance of 1.5–2.5 MΩ filled with ACSF. The recordings were amplified with a neutralized, high-input-impedance preamplifier and filtered (1 Hz–3 kHz). The fEPSPs were digitized (AIF-03, Experimetria Ltd., Budapest, Hungary), acquired at a sampling rate of 10 kHz, saved to a PC, and analyzed off-line with Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). The fEPSPs were monitored for 15–20 min until the amplitudes were stable. After having stabilized the amplitudes, the last 5 min of resting period (before administration of a compound) were taken as baseline (control, see * in Figure 1A). After baseline recording, KYNA or its analogs were bath-applied for 30 min, and a wash-out occurred for another 30-min-period. The effect of a compound was calculated based on the amplitudes obtained during the last 5 min of wash-in period (see # in Figure 1). The properties of the basal glutamatergic synaptic transmission were also tested by means of fEPSP recordings; in IO (input-output) graphs the fEPSP amplitudes are expressed against gradually increasing stimulating currents (0–60 µA, in 5-µA steps) in certain groups (data not shown). Each slice was subjected to only one measurement [59,60]. 7–10 measurements (N) were carried out in case of each concentration of each compound, respectively. The actual numbers of measurements (N) are in the bars of graphs in Figure 2. Altogether, 117 slices were used to test the effects of KYNA and of its analogs.

5. Statistical Analysis

Field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) evoked by Schaffer collateral stimulation were measured from ‘a’ to ‘b’ (see Figure 1A, inset). Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) was used for the analyses. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Dunnett post hoc tests was used for assessing the differences between amplitudes of controls and of KYNA and of its analogs during wash-in.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Jennifer Tusz, native speaker (Edmonton, Canada), for valuable contribution in proofreading of the manuscript.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1
Click here for additional data file. (737.1KB, pdf)

Author Contributions

F.F. and I.S. planned the derivatives and developed the synthesis; L.V. and J.T. conceived and designed the experiments; I.S. and B.L. created the KYNA derivatives; E.F., T.D., and A.Z. performed the electrophysiological experiments; T.F. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the Economic Development and Innovation Operational Program (Gazdaságfejlesztési és Innovációs Operatív Programs; GINOP 2.3.2-15-2016-00048, STAY ALIVE and GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00034), financed by the European Union and by the MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences as well as by the University of Szeged, Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary grant (20391-3/2018/FEKUSTRAT). This work was supported by the University of Szeged Open Access Fund, grant number: 4299.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available.

References

  • 1.Kostandy B.B. The role of glutamate in neuronal ischemic injury: The role of spark in fire. Neurol. Sci. 2012;33:223–237. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0828-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lai T.W., Zhang S., Wang Y.T. Excitotoxicity and stroke: Identifying novel targets for neuroprotection. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014;115:157–188. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O’Leary R.A., Nichol A.D. Pathophysiology of severe traumatic brain injury overview. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2018;62:542–548. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04501-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Olloquequi J., Cornejo-Cordova E., Verdaguer E., Soriano F.X., Binvignat O., Auladell C., Camins A. Excitotoxicity in the pathogenesis of neurological and psychiatric disorders: Therapeutic implications. J. Psychopharmacol. 2018;32:265–275. doi: 10.1177/0269881118754680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Puyal J., Ginet V., Clarke P.G. Multiple interacting cell death mechanisms in the mediation of excitotoxicity and ischemic brain damage: A challenge for neuroprotection. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013;105:24–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gonzalez J., Jurado-Coronel J.C., Avila M.F., Sabogal A., Capani F., Barreto G.E. NMDARs in neurological diseases: A potential therapeutic target. Int. J. Neurosci. 2015;125:315–327. doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.940941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Katsuki H., Nonaka M., Shirakawa H., Kume T., Akaike A. Endogenous D-serine is involved in induction of neuronal death by N-methyl-D-aspartate and simulated ischemia in rat cerebrocortical slices. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2004;311:836–844. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.070912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Manning S.M., Talos D.M., Zhou C., Selip D.B., Park H.K., Park C.J., Volpe J.J., Jensen F.E. NMDA receptor blockade with memantine attenuates white matter injury in a rat model of periventricular leukomalacia. J. Neurosci. 2008;28:6670–6678. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1702-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mothet J.P., Parent A.T., Wolosker H., Brady R.O., Jr., Linden D.J., Ferris C.D., Rogawski M.A., Snyder S.H. D-serine is an endogenous ligand for the glycine site of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:4926–4931. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sas K., Robotka H., Rozsa E., Agoston M., Szenasi G., Gigler G., Marosi M., Kis Z., Farkas T., Vecsei L., et al. Kynurenine diminishes the ischemia-induced histological and electrophysiological deficits in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol. Dis. 2008;32:302–308. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Criddle M.W., Godfrey D.A., Kaltenbach J.A. Attenuation of noise-induced hyperactivity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus by pre-treatment with MK-801. Brain Res. 2018;1682:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Qian Y., Tang X., Guan T., Li Y., Sun H. Neuroprotection by Combined Administration with Maslinic Acid, a Natural Product from Olea europaea, and MK-801 in the Cerebral Ischemia Model. Molecules. 2016;21:1093. doi: 10.3390/molecules21081093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Muir K.W., Lees K.R. Clinical experience with excitatory amino acid antagonist drugs. Stroke. 1995;26:503–513. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.26.3.503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Contreras P.C. D-serine antagonized phencyclidine- and MK-801-induced stereotyped behavior and ataxia. Neuropharmacology. 1990;29:291–293. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(90)90015-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Krystal J.H., D’Souza D.C., Petrakis I.L., Belger A., Berman R.M., Charney D.S., Abi-Saab W., Madonick S. NMDA agonists and antagonists as probes of glutamatergic dysfunction and pharmacotherapies in neuropsychiatric disorders. Harv. Rev. Psychiatry. 1999;7:125–143. doi: 10.3109/hrp.7.3.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scorza M.C., Castane A., Bortolozzi A., Artigas F. Clozapine does not require 5-HT1A receptors to block the locomotor hyperactivity induced by MK-801 Clz and MK-801 in KO1A mice. Neuropharmacology. 2010;59:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Muir K.W. Glutamate-based therapeutic approaches: Clinical trials with NMDA antagonists. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2006;6:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schwarcz R. The kynurenine pathway of tryptophan degradation as a drug target. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2004;4:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vécsei L. Kynurenines Int He Brain: From Experiments to Clinics. Nova Biomedical Books; New York, NY, USA: 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kessler M., Terramani T., Lynch G., Baudry M. A glycine site associated with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors: Characterization and identification of a new class of antagonists. J. Neurochem. 1989;52:1319–1328. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb01881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hilmas C., Pereira E.F., Alkondon M., Rassoulpour A., Schwarcz R., Albuquerque E.X. The brain metabolite kynurenic acid inhibits alpha7 nicotinic receptor activity and increases non-alpha7 nicotinic receptor expression: Physiopathological implications. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:7463–7473. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07463.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Carpenedo R., Pittaluga A., Cozzi A., Attucci S., Galli A., Raiteri M., Moroni F. Presynaptic kynurenate-sensitive receptors inhibit glutamate release. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2001;13:2141–2147. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J., Simonavicius N., Wu X., Swaminath G., Reagan J., Tian H., Ling L. Kynurenic acid as a ligand for orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR35. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:22021–22028. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603503200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DiNatale B.C., Murray I.A., Schroeder J.C., Flaveny C.A., Lahoti T.S., Laurenzana E.M., Omiecinski C.J., Perdew G.H. Kynurenic acid is a potent endogenous aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand that synergistically induces interleukin-6 in the presence of inflammatory signaling. Toxicol. Sci. 2010;115:89–97. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Szalardy L., Klivenyi P., Zadori D., Fulop F., Toldi J., Vecsei L. Mitochondrial disturbances, tryptophan metabolites and neurodegeneration: Medicinal chemistry aspects. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012;19:1899–1920. doi: 10.2174/092986712800167365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gellert L., Knapp L., Nemeth K., Heredi J., Varga D., Olah G., Kocsis K., Menyhart A., Kis Z., Farkas T., et al. Post-ischemic treatment with L-kynurenine sulfate exacerbates neuronal damage after transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. Neuroscience. 2013;247:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mangas A., Yajeya J., Gonzalez N., Ruiz I., Duleu S., Geffard M., Covenas R. Overexpression of kynurenic acid in stroke: An endogenous neuroprotector? Ann. Anat. 2017;211:33–38. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vecsei L., Szalardy L., Fulop F., Toldi J. Kynurenines in the CNS: Recent advances and new questions. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013;12:64–82. doi: 10.1038/nrd3793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fulop F., Szatmari I., Vamos E., Zadori D., Toldi J., Vecsei L. Syntheses, transformations and pharmaceutical applications of kynurenic acid derivatives. Curr. Med. Chem. 2009;16:4828–4842. doi: 10.2174/092986709789909602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nagy K., Plangar I., Tuka B., Gellert L., Varga D., Demeter I., Farkas T., Kis Z., Marosi M., Zadori D., et al. Synthesis and biological effects of some kynurenic acid analogs. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2011;19:7590–7596. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2011.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marosi M., Nagy D., Farkas T., Kis Z., Rozsa E., Robotka H., Fulop F., Vecsei L., Toldi J. A novel kynurenic acid analogue: A comparison with kynurenic acid. An in vitro electrophysiological study. J. Neural Transm. 2010;117:183–188. doi: 10.1007/s00702-009-0346-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zadori D., Nyiri G., Szonyi A., Szatmari I., Fulop F., Toldi J., Freund T.F., Vecsei L., Klivenyi P. Neuroprotective effects of a novel kynurenic acid analogue in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2011;118:865–875. doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0573-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Demeter I., Nagy K., Farkas T., Kis Z., Kocsis K., Knapp L., Gellert L., Fulop F., Vecsei L., Toldi J. Paradox effects of kynurenines on LTP induction in the Wistar rat. An in vivo study. Neurosci. Lett. 2013;553:138–141. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kassai F., Kedves R., Gyertyan I., Tuka B., Fulop F., Toldi J., Lendvai B., Vecsei L. Effect of a kynurenic acid analog on home-cage activity and body temperature in rats. Pharmacol. Rep. 2015;67:1188–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Knyihar-Csillik E., Mihaly A., Krisztin-Peva B., Robotka H., Szatmari I., Fulop F., Toldi J., Csillik B., Vecsei L. The kynurenate analog SZR-72 prevents the nitroglycerol-induced increase of c-fos immunoreactivity in the rat caudal trigeminal nucleus: Comparative studies of the effects of SZR-72 and kynurenic acid. Neurosci. Res. 2008;61:429–432. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lukacs M., Warfvinge K., Kruse L.S., Tajti J., Fulop F., Toldi J., Vecsei L., Edvinsson L. KYNA analogue SZR72 modifies CFA-induced dural inflammation-regarding expression of pERK1/2 and IL-1beta in the rat trigeminal ganglion. J. Headache Pain. 2016;17:64. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0654-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhou Y., Li W., Liu Y., Zeng L., Su W., Zhou M. Substituent effect of ancillary ligands on the luminescence of bis [4,6-(di-fluorophenyl)-pyridinato-N,C2’]iridium(III) complexes. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:9373–9381. doi: 10.1039/c2dt30695f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fulop F., Szatmari I., Toldi J., Vecsei L. Novel Types of C-3 Substituted Kynurenic Acid Derivatives with Improved Neuroprotective Activity. 16/082,099. U.S. Patent. 2019 Apr 11;
  • 39.Nozaki K., Beal M.F. Neuroprotective effects of L-kynurenine on hypoxia-ischemia and NMDA lesions in neonatal rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1992;12:400–407. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1992.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stone T.W. Development and therapeutic potential of kynurenic acid and kynurenine derivatives for neuroprotection. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2000;21:149–154. doi: 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01451-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wu H.Q., Lee S.C., Scharfman H.E., Schwarcz R. L-4-chlorokynurenine attenuates kainate-induced seizures and lesions in the rat. Exp. Neurol. 2002;177:222–232. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.7971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rozsa E., Robotka H., Nagy D., Farkas T., Sas K., Vecsei L., Toldi J. The pentylenetetrazole-induced activity in the hippocampus can be inhibited by the conversion of L-kynurenine to kynurenic acid: An in vitro study. Brain Res. Bull. 2008;76:474–479. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Vamos E., Pardutz A., Varga H., Bohar Z., Tajti J., Fulop F., Toldi J., Vecsei L. l-kynurenine combined with probenecid and the novel synthetic kynurenic acid derivative attenuate nitroglycerin-induced nNOS in the rat caudal trigeminal nucleus. Neuropharmacology. 2009;57:425–429. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gigler G., Szenasi G., Simo A., Levay G., Harsing L.G., Jr., Sas K., Vecsei L., Toldi J. Neuroprotective effect of L-kynurenine sulfate administered before focal cerebral ischemia in mice and global cerebral ischemia in gerbils. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007;564:116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Robotka H., Sas K., Agoston M., Rozsa E., Szenasi G., Gigler G., Vecsei L., Toldi J. Neuroprotection achieved in the ischaemic rat cortex with L-kynurenine sulphate. Life Sci. 2008;82:915–919. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fulop F., Szatmari I., Toldi J., Vecsei L. Modifications on the carboxylic function of kynurenic acid. J. Neural Transm. 2012;119:109–114. doi: 10.1007/s00702-011-0721-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arrigoni E., Greene R.W. Schaffer collateral and perforant path inputs activate different subtypes of NMDA receptors on the same CA1 pyramidal cell. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004;142:317–322. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wu Y., Kawakami R., Shinohara Y., Fukaya M., Sakimura K., Mishina M., Watanabe M., Ito I., Shigemoto R. Target-cell-specific left-right asymmetry of NMDA receptor content in schaffer collateral synapses in epsilon1/NR2A knock-out mice. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:9213–9226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2134-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Prescott C., Weeks A.M., Staley K.J., Partin K.M. Kynurenic acid has a dual action on AMPA receptor responses. Neurosci. Lett. 2006;402:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.03.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rozsa E., Robotka H., Vecsei L., Toldi J. The Janus-face kynurenic acid. J. Neural Transm. 2008;115:1087–1091. doi: 10.1007/s00702-008-0052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vamos E., Fejes A., Koch J., Tajti J., Fulop F., Toldi J., Pardutz A., Vecsei L. Kynurenate derivative attenuates the nitroglycerin-induced CamKIIalpha and CGRP expression changes. Headache. 2010;50:834–843. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01574.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hardingham G.E., Bading H. Synaptic versus extrasynaptic NMDA receptor signalling: Implications for neurodegenerative disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010;11:682–696. doi: 10.1038/nrn2911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Papouin T., Oliet S.H. Organization, control and function of extrasynaptic NMDA receptors. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014;369:20130601. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Petralia R.S., Wang Y.X., Hua F., Yi Z., Zhou A., Ge L., Stephenson F.A., Wenthold R.J. Organization of NMDA receptors at extrasynaptic locations. Neuroscience. 2010;167:68–87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Szapiro G., Barbour B. Parasynaptic signalling by fast neurotransmitters: The cerebellar cortex. Neuroscience. 2009;162:644–655. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.03.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Paoletti P., Bellone C., Zhou Q. NMDA receptor subunit diversity: Impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013;14:383–400. doi: 10.1038/nrn3504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pal B. Involvement of extrasynaptic glutamate in physiological and pathophysiological changes of neuronal excitability. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:2917–2949. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2837-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Borza I., Kolok S., Galgoczy K., Gere A., Horvath C., Farkas S., Greiner I., Domany G. Kynurenic acid amides as novel NR2B selective NMDA receptor antagonists. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2007;17:406–409. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2006.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kocsis K., Knapp L., Gellert L., Olah G., Kis Z., Takakuwa H., Iwamori N., Ono E., Toldi J., Farkas T. Acetyl-L-carnitine normalizes the impaired long-term potentiation and spine density in a rat model of global ischemia. Neuroscience. 2014;269:265–272. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Marosi M., Fuzik J., Nagy D., Rakos G., Kis Z., Vecsei L., Toldi J., Ruban-Matuzani A., Teichberg V.I., Farkas T. Oxaloacetate restores the long-term potentiation impaired in rat hippocampus CA1 region by 2-vessel occlusion. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2009;604:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1
Click here for additional data file. (737.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES