Skip to main content
Human Genome Variation logoLink to Human Genome Variation
. 2019 Oct 18;6:48. doi: 10.1038/s41439-019-0078-2

Ten novel insertion/deletion variants in MECP2 identified in Japanese patients with Rett syndrome

Eri Takeshita 1,#, Aritoshi Iida 2,#, Chihiro Abe-Hatano 3, Eiji Nakagawa 1, Masayuki Sasaki 1, Ken Inoue 3, Yu-ichi Goto 3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC6804785  PMID: 31645986

Abstract

Rett syndrome (RTT) is an X-linked progressive and severe neurological disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2). Among the 49 typical RTT patients examined, we identified 10 novel and eight known insertion/deletion variants, and 31 known pathogenic variants in MECP2. The pathogenic variants presented here should be a useful resource for examining the correlation between the genotypes and phenotypes of RTT.

Subject terms: DNA sequencing, Genetics research


Rett syndrome (RTT) is a progressive neurodevelopmental disorder that affects brain development and function in females, with a prevalence of one in 10,000 worldwide1. Typical RTT is caused by mutations in the gene encoding methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2)2. A database of a large collection of MECP2 variants was established in 2002 (RettBASE: http://mecp2.chw.edu.au/index.shtml)3. To date, associations between clinical phenotypes and related genetic variants for MECP2 as well as other RTT-associated genes, including CDKL5 and FOXG1, are available.

Here, we report a total of 49 RTT patients with 10 novel insertion/deletion variants, eight known insertion/deletion variants and 31 known pathological variants.

All patients were diagnosed with typical RTT by Japanese child neurology experts according to the international diagnostic criteria for RTT. Clinical information and samples from the patient and parents were obtained with written informed consent. The study was approved by the ethical committee of NCNP. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a standard protocol. We first used the MLPA method (MRC-Holland, DL Amsterdam, The Netherlands) to identify the structural abnormalities in the MECP2 locus. In the patients excluded for structural abnormalities, we amplified all coding exons of MECP2 and their exon-intron boundaries by PCR and directly sequenced the PCR products using the Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA analyzer (Thermo Fisher, USA).

The insertion/deletion mutations were detected in 18 (36.7%) of 49 patients with RTT (Table 1). Among the 18 patients, 10 (55.6%) were considered novel by a comparison of our data with the known insertions/deletions deposited in the public databases, including RettBASE, gnomAD, Human Genome Mutation Database Professional 2019.2 and ClinVar. Representative data of pedigrees and sequences of the recombination breakpoints from three families are shown in Fig. 1. Patient 470 showed the insertion/deletion variant at c.1158_1258delinsCCGAGGGTGGCTCC. Patient 488 showed the deletion at c.1168_*539del. Patient 587 showed the insertion/deletion at c.1367_*791delinsCGC. Five (Patients 187, 470, 488, 559, and 587) had lost only exon 4. In addition, Patient 269 has a complex rearrangement with a 2609 bp deletion, including exon 3 and flanking introns, accompanied by two nucleotide substitution and a 25 bp deletion in exon4, c. [27-1707_c.378-206del; 1159_1160CC>AG; 1164_1188del], occurred in cis. The other five showed intragenic deletion involving exon 4 in the MECP2 locus. Hardwick et al. (2007) reported that 12 out of 21 patients (57%)4 experienced breakpoints within the “deletion-prone region (DPR)”, which is characterized by short direct repeat elements and is also known as the hotspot for the smaller deletions5,6. In this study, the breakpoints in seven novel insertion/deletion variants (7/10: 70%) were located within the DPR. In the breakpoints of Patients 269, 289 and 451, no repetitive sequences were found adjacent to the breakpoint. These findings suggest that the de novo deletion events involving MECP2 can be unique to families and that homology-mediated mechanisms are unlikely to be associated with these events.

Table 1.

Insertion/deletion variants in MECP2 in Japanese patients with RTT

Family ID Sex Age (year:month) Substitution Exon/Intron deleted DPR (1057–1209) Deleted domain Note
Nucleotide Amino acid
187 F 3 years 2 months c.816_819del p.(Gly273Valfs*) Exon 4 TRD This study
269 F 3 years c.[27–1707_c.378-206del; 1159_1160CC > AG; 1164_1188del] p.[Pro387Ser; Pro388fs*] Intron 2-Exon 4 Deleted CTD
289 F 2 years 11 months c.378-375_c.1193del Intron 3-Exon 4 Deleted MBD, ID, TRD
451 F 3 years c.27–7899_c.1137del Intron 2-Exon 4 Deleted NTD, MBD, ID, TRD
470 F 27 years 1 month c.1158_1258delinsCCGAGGGTGGCTCC p.(Pro387_Pro419delinsArgGlyTrpLeu) Exon 4 Deleted CTD
487 F 36 years 11 months c.27-?_378 + ?del ? Intron 2-Exon 4 ?
488 F 2 years 4 months c.1168_*539del p.(Pro390_Ser486delinsValArgSerHisProTrpTrpLeuLysSerGlyProThrProAlaProIleGlnAsnTrpGlnGlyArgPheThrGlyGlnGluSerGlyThrCysLeuLeuGlnLeuTrpHisGly) Exon 4 Deleted CTD
500 F 2 years 1 month c.27-?_378 + ?del ? Intron 2-Exon 4 ?
559 F 2 years 1 month c.1038_1195delinsAGCA p.(Ser346Argfs*) Exon 4 Deleted CTD
587 F 10 years 2 months c.1367_*791delinsCGC p.(Gly456_Ser486delinsAlaLeuGlyGlnGlyAlaGlyArgLeuAlaTrpGlyGlnAlaGlyGlnSerThrAlaGly) Exon 4 Deleted CTD
288 F 2 years 6 months c.806del p.(Gly269Alafs*) Exon 4 TRD Wan M et al. (1999)
376 F 4 years 2 months c.47–57del p.(Gly16Glufs*) Exon 4 NTD Mnatzakanian GN et al. (2004)
467 F 2 years 1 month c.696del p.(Lys233Argfs*) Exon 4 TRD Obata K et al. (2000)
497 F 1 year 1 month c.710dupG p.(Gly238Trpfs*) Exon 4 TRD Hoffbuhr K et al. (2001)
511 F 4 years c.808del p.(Arg270Glufs*) Exon 4 TRD Obata K et al. (2000)
539 F 5 years 6 months c.1157_1200del p.(Leu386fs*) Exon 4 Deleted CTD RettBASE
555 F 3 years 2 months c.1154_1197del p.(Pro385Hisfs*) Exon 4 Deleted CTD Bienvenu T et al. (2002)
572 F 1 year 9 months c.710del p.(Gly237fs*) Exon 4 TRD Amir RE et al. (2000)

NM_004992.3(MECP2_i001)

ID Interdomain, CTD C-terminal domain, MBD methyl CpG binding domain, NTD N-terminal domain, TRD transcriptional repression domain

Fig. 1. Sequence analysis of the breakpoints of MECP2 structural variants in three RTT patients.

Fig. 1

a–c Pedigrees of each family (left). Nucleotide sequences of MECP2 in patient 470, 488, 587, and controls spanning the breakpoint of each structural variant. All samples were amplified by PCR and then cloned into a plasmid vector, followed by direct sequencing of the junction fragments

In addition, we identified known pathogenic variants in 31 patients (Supplementary Table 1). No novel change was identified, suggesting that the molecular basis for recurrent de novo nucleotide substitutions in MECP2 is common among the different populations.

The list of MECP2 variants found in 49 Japanese patients with RTT should provide a useful resource to further examine the correlation between genotypes and disease phenotypes.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1 (11.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary References (21.4KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the patients who participated in this study. We thank the attending physicians and Yoko Nakamura and Yoshie Sawano (Department of Mental Retardation and Birth Defect Research, National Institute of Neurology, NCNP) for their technical contribution. This study is partially supported by the Program for an Integrated Database of Clinical and Genomic Information (17kk0205012h0002 to Y.G.) and Construction of integrated database of clinical and genomics information and sustainable system for promoting genomic medicine in Japan (18kk0205012s0303 to Y.G.) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED, and the Intramural Research Grant (27-6 to Y.G.; 30-9 to A.I. for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP, and Joint Usage and Joint Research Programs, the Institute of Advanced Medical Sciences, Tokushima University (A.I.).

HGV Database

The relevant data from this Data Report are hosted at the Human Genome Variation Database at

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2648

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2651

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2654

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2657

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2660

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2663

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2666

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2669

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2672

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2675

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2678

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2681

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2684

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2687

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2690

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2693

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2696

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2699

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2702

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2705

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2708

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2711

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2714

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2717

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2720

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2723

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2726

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2729

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2732

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2735

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2738

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2741

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2744

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2747

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2750

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2753

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2756

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2759

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2762

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2765

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2768

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2771

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2774

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2777

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2780

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2783

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Eri Takeshita, Aritoshi Iida

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41439-019-0078-2.

References

  • 1.Ip JPK, Mellios N, Sur M. Rett syndrome: insights into genetic, molecular and circuit mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2018;19:368–382. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0006-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amir RE, et al. Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat. Genet. 1998;23:185–188. doi: 10.1038/13810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Krishnaraj R, Ho G, Christodoulou J. RettBASE: Rett syndrome database update. Hum. Mutat. 2017;38:922–931. doi: 10.1002/humu.23263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hardwick SA, Reuter K, Williamson SL, Vasudevan V, Donald J, Slater K. Delineation of large deletions of the MECP2 gene in Rett syndrome patients, including a familial case with a male proband. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2007;15:1218–1229. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Laccone F, et al. Large deletions of the MECP2 gene detected by gene dosage analysis in patients with Rett syndrome. Hum. Mutat. 2004;3:234–244. doi: 10.1002/humu.20004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vidal S, et al. Characterization of large deletions of the MECP2 gene in Rett syndrome patients by gene dosageanalysis. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 2019;7:e793. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1 (11.3KB, xlsx)
Supplementary References (21.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The relevant data from this Data Report are hosted at the Human Genome Variation Database at

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2648

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2651

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2654

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2657

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2660

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2663

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2666

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2669

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2672

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2675

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2678

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2681

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2684

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2687

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2690

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2693

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2696

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2699

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2702

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2705

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2708

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2711

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2714

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2717

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2720

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2723

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2726

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2729

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2732

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2735

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2738

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2741

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2744

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2747

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2750

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2753

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2756

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2759

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2762

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2765

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2768

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2771

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2774

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2777

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2780

10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.2783


Articles from Human Genome Variation are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES