Abstract
Background
While denosumab has been shown to prevent skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastasis, there is a concern that it may cause atypical femoral fracture (AFF). While AFF has been reported in patients with osteoporosis receiving denosumab, data are scarce in the context of AFF occurring in patients with bone metastasis receiving monthly denosumab therapy.
Methods
To analyze the incidence of AFF in patients with bone metastasis, we reviewed the medical records of patients who had received monthly denosumab (120 mg) treatment from May 2012 to June 2017 at any of the three participant institutions.
Results
The study population consisted of 277 patients who had received a median of 10 doses (range, 1–79) of denosumab. Five patients were diagnosed as having AFF or symptomatic atypical femoral stress reaction (AFSR) needing surgical intervention, representing an incidence rate of 1.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.77–4.2). These patients had received 15, 45, 45, 46 or 47 doses of denosumab, respectively. Four of the patients had received prior zoledronic acid treatment. The results of our analysis suggested that long-term use of denosumab, especially for more than 3.5 years, and prior use of zoledronic acid were risk factors for the development of AFF.
Conclusions
We found the AFF events in 5 patients (1.8%) among 277 cancer patients who had received monthly denosumab (120 mg) treatment. Long-term denosumab treatment and prior zoledronic acid treatment were identified as risk factors for the development of AFF.
Keywords: Femoral fractures, Denosumab, Bone metastasis, Retrospective studiess, Systematic review
Background
Treatment with bisphosphonates (BP) and denosumab is known to reduce the frequency of skeletal-related events (SREs), such as pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, need for external beam radiation or surgery to the bone, and hypercalcemia associated with cancer with bone metastasis [1–4]. Denosumab, an inhibitor of the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL), has been demonstrated to delay the time to onset of the first SRE and lower the risk of occurrence of the first SRE, as compared to zoledronate, in patients with bone metastasis [5–11]. However, atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been reported as a potential adverse effect of both BPs and denosumab. The absolute risk of AFF associated with BP therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis or osteopenia was 3.2 to 50 cases per 100,000 person-years, and patients receiving long-term treatment or much higher doses of BPs have been found to be at a higher risk of development of AFF [12–14].
According to the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR), AFF is defined as a fracture located along the femoral diaphysis between just distal to the lesser trochanter and just proximal to the supracondylar flare. ASBMR revised the diagnostic criteria for AFF in 2013, which now consist of five major criteria and four minor criteria [14]. Association with minimal or no trauma, as with a fall from a standing height or less is one of the major features. Localized periosteal or endosteal thickening of the lateral cortex at the fracture site, which is called “beaking” or “flaring”, is another major feature (Table 1).
Table 1.
American Society for Bone and Mineral Research Task Force 2013 Revised Case Definition of AFF
| To satisfy the case definition of AFF, the fracture must be located along the femoral diaphysis between just distal to the lesser trochanter and just proximal to the supracondylar flare. In addition, at least four of the five Major Features must be present. None of the Minor Features is required, but they are known to sometimes be associated with these fractures [14]. | |
| Major features | |
| 1: The fracture is associated with minimal or no trauma, as after a fall from a standing height or less. | |
| 2: The fracture line originates in the lateral cortex and is substantially transverse in its orientation, although it may become oblique as it progresses medially across the femur. | |
| 3: Complete fractures extend through both cortices and may be associated with a medial spike; incomplete fractures involve only the lateral cortex. | |
| 4: The fracture is noncomminuted or minimally comminuted. | |
| 5: Localized periosteal or endosteal thickening of the lateral cortex is present at the fracture site (“beaking” or “flaring”). | |
| Minor features | |
| 1: Generalized increase in the cortical thickness at the femoral diaphysis | |
| 2: Unilateral or bilateral prodromal symptoms, such as dull or aching pain in the groin or thigh | |
| 3: Bilateral incomplete or complete femoral diaphysis fractures | |
| 4: Delayed fracture healing |
Although the pathogenesis of AFF is not fully understood, the cause of AFF is considered to be stress or insufficient fractures that accumulate due to the suppression of bone remodeling by BP or denosumab treatment. Continuous loading of femur may develop microcracks within the bone cortex and BP or denosumab inhibit the normal osteoclastic resorption of them, which may eventually lead a fracture [15].
AFF has been reported in patients receiving denosumab 60 mg at 6-month intervals for osteoporosis [16–21]. On the other hand, no AFF events were recorded in clinical trials of monthly denosumab (120 mg) treatment for patients with bone metastasis, despite the higher and more frequent dosing [6–12]. Although Yang, et al. reported one case of clinical AFF in a patient receiving oncologic denosumab therapy from a retrospective review [22], clinical and pathological data are still lacking. We conducted this retrospective multi-center study to assess the incidence of AFF and the clinical and pathological features of patients with bone metastasis treated with denosumab at the dose of 120 mg monthly, and performed a systematic review of articles on this subject that we retrieved from a search of PubMed.
Methods
In this multi-center retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records and pharmacy database of patients who had received monthly denosumab (120 mg) treatment for the management of bone metastasis from May 2012 to June 2017 at any of the three participant institutions. We then reviewed the clinical features and skeletal images of the patients who had developed AFF or atypical femoral stress reaction (AFSR) with “beaking” on radiographs. The definition of AFF was based on the definition coined by the ASBMR Task Force 2013, which is shown in Table 1 [14]. The fracture must be located along the femoral diaphysis between just distal to the lesser trochanter and just proximal to the supracondylar flare.
To identify the risk factors for AFF and the optimal management method for this condition in patients with bone metastasis receiving denosumab treatment, we conducted a systematic search of the literature for original articles in English published in the online PubMed database from January 2006 to November 2018. The search terms used were as follows: “atypical femoral fracture”, “denosumab”. We also reviewed the references cited in the included articles to identify additional studies. All the search results were evaluated independently by two of the authors (M.T. and Y.O.). The inclusion criteria for the articles to be reviewed were as follows: 1) study population: patients who had received denosumab for the treatment of bone metastasis; 2) method: prospective study, retrospective study, or case report; 3) language: English. Studies not fulfilling the above inclusion criteria, as also abstracts from conferences and commentary articles, were excluded. The last search was conducted on 1st February 2019.
In the analysis of the data from the medical records and pharmacy database, continuous variables were summarized as the means ± standard deviation or median with range, as appropriate. Categorical variables were summarized in terms of frequencies and percentages. In the analysis of the incidence rate of AFF, the 95% confidence intervals were estimated by the exact method, and differences between subgroups was compared by Fisher’s exact test. To evaluate the association between the duration of denosumab treatment and the occurrence of AFF events, the cumulative incidence curve was constructed by the Kaplan-Meier method. AFF event, in accordance with the definition proposed by the ASBMR Task Force 2013, and/or AFSR needing surgical intervention were diagnosed by one or more orthopedists. P values of less than 0.05 were considered as denoting statistical significance. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
We analyzed the data of 277 patients, and the patient characteristics are shown in Table 2. The median age of the patients was 65 (range, 29–88) years, and the primary disease was breast cancer in the majority (57%). Other primary diseases (5%) included GIST, head and neck cancer, neuroendocrine carcinoma, thyroid cancer, salivary gland cancer, thymoma, leiomyosarcoma, gallbladder carcinoma, urothelial cancer and dermatofibrosarcoma (Table 2). Metastatic sites other than bone metastasis mainly included the lung (43%), liver (39%), lymph node (53%), etc.; other sites included the skin, pancreas, retina, ovary and salivary gland. Among the 277 patients, 56 (20%) had received prior zoledronic acid treatment. The patients had received a median of 10 doses (range; 1–79) of denosumab, and 16 (5%) patients had received more than 45 doses. The clinical features of the patients with breast cancer are shown in Table 3; the majority had hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (81%). Of the breast cancer patients, 61 (38%) had received preoperative chemotherapy, and 39 (25%) had received aromatase inhibitor treatment as adjuvant endocrine therapy; furthermore, 39 (25%) patients had received prior zoledronic acid treatment. The breast cancer patients had received a median of 18 doses (range; 1–79) of denosumab, and 15 (9%) patients had received more than 45 doses. The sites of bone metastasis are shown in Table 4. The most frequent metastatic sites were the thoracic vertebrae (44%), and 15% of the patients had femur metastasis. Other skeletal sites included the clavicle, mandible and tibial bone.
Table 2.
Patient characteristics
| Number of patients | |
|---|---|
| Characteristics | n = 277, n (%) |
| Age, median (range) | median 65 (29–88) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 93 (34) |
| Female | 184 (66) |
| Primary disease | |
| Breast cancer | 159 (57) |
| Prostate cancer | 26 (9) |
| Pancreatic cancer | 13 (5) |
| Lung cancer | 12 (4) |
| RCC | 12 (4) |
| Gastric cancer | 11 (4) |
| Carcinoma of unknown primary | 8 (3) |
| Colorectal cancer | 8 (3) |
| Esophageal cancer | 5 (2) |
| Urothelial cancer | 4 (1) |
| Melanoma | 2 (1) |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | 2 (1) |
| Others | 15 (5) |
| Stage at diagnosis | |
| I | 21 (8) |
| II | 58 (22) |
| III | 46 (17) |
| IV | 94 (35) |
| Unknown | 46 (17) |
| Perioperative chemotherapy | |
| Yes | 80 (29) |
| No | 195 (70) |
| Unknown | 2 (1) |
| Metastatic site | |
| Lung | 120 (43) |
| Liver | 107 (39) |
| Lymph node | 147 (53) |
| Bone | 277 (100) |
| Brain | 28 (10) |
| Pleura | 23 (8) |
| Peritoneum | 20 (7) |
| Adrenal gland | 17 (6) |
| Others | 19 (7) |
| Prior zoledronic acid treatment | |
| Yes | 56 (20) |
| No | 167 (60) |
| Unknown | 54 (19) |
| Number of doses of denosumab | median 10 (1–79) |
| More than 45 doses of denosumab | 16 (5) |
Table 3.
Characteristics of the patients with breast cancer
| Number of patients | |
|---|---|
| Characteristics | n = 159 (%) |
| Stage at diagnosis | |
| I | 17 (11) |
| II | 50 (31) |
| III | 32 (20) |
| IV | 31 (20) |
| Unknown | 28 (17) |
| Subtype | |
| HR+ HER2- | 108 (68) |
| HR+ HER2+ | 20 (13) |
| HR- HER2+ | 9 (6) |
| HR- HER2- | 14 (9) |
| Unknown | 8 (5) |
| Perioperative chemotherapy | |
| Yes | 61 (38) |
| Anthracycline regimen | 11 (7) |
| Anthracycline + taxane regimen | 26 (16) |
| Other regimens | 24 (15) |
| No | 97 (61) |
| Unknown | 1 (1) |
| Adjuvant endocrine therapy | |
| Aromatase inhibitor | 39 (25) |
| Tamoxifen | 29 (19) |
| Ovarian function suppression | 22 (14) |
| None | 22 (14) |
| Unknown | 1 (1) |
| Prior treatment with zoledronic acid | |
| Yes | 39 (25) |
| No | 92 (60) |
| Unknown | 23 (15) |
| Number of denosumab doses | median 18 (range: 1–79) |
| More than 45 doses of denosumab | 15 (9) |
Table 4.
Sites of bone metastasis
| Number of patients | |
|---|---|
| Site of bone metastasis | n = 277 (%) |
| Cervical vertebra | 53 (19) |
| Thoracic vertebra | 123 (44) |
| Lumbar vertebra | 115 (42) |
| Sacral bone | 38 (14) |
| Costal bone | 77 (28) |
| Sternum | 43 (16) |
| Pelvis | 100 (36) |
| Femur | 41 (15) |
| Humerus | 19 (7) |
| Scapula | 21 (8) |
| Cranium | 14 (5) |
| Others | 14 (5) |
Among the 277 patients, five patients were diagnosed as having AFF and/or AFSR needing surgical intervention, representing an incidence rate of 1.8% (95% CI: 0.77–4.2). The details of the clinical features of these five patients are shown in Table 5.
Table 5.
Clinical features of the AFF cases identified in this retrospective study
| Case No. | Primary disease | Site of metastasis | Prior zoledronic acid treatment | Doses of denosumab | Diagnosis | Operation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Breast Ca. | Bone | + | 45 |
Lt. AFF Rt. AFSR |
+ - |
| 2 | Breast Ca. | Bone, Skin, Lung | + | 47 |
Lt. AFF Rt. femur meta. |
+ - |
| 3 | Breast Ca. | Bone | + | 45 |
Lt. AFSR Rt. AFSR |
+ + |
| 4 | Breast Ca. | Bone, Lung, LN | + | 46 |
Lt. AFF Rt. AFSR |
+ + |
| 5 | NSCLC | Bone, Lung, LN, CNS | – | 15 |
Lt. AFF Rt. intact |
+ - |
Case 1
A patient was diagnosed as having invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast. The patient underwent left mastectomy and axillary lymph node (LN) dissection, and analysis of the specimen revealed that the cancer was estrogen receptor (ER)- positive, progesterone receptor (PR)- positive, and HER2-negative. The pathological stage was pTxN1M0, and the patient received 6 cycles of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil chemotherapy, followed by adjuvant hormone therapy with tamoxifen for 3 years. Multiple bone metastases (cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae) were detected and treatment was initiated with an aromatase inhibitor, anastrozole, and zoledronic acid at 13 years after initial diagnosis. Disease progression was detected and administration of exemestane was initiated. At 16 years after initial diagnosis, zoledronic acid was switched to denosumab. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed a new lesion in a thoracic vertebra and the hormone therapy was switched to fulvestrant. Capecitabine administration was initiated due to disease progression. Subsequently, the patient fell and was diagnosed as having left AFF after 45 doses of denosumab and underwent intramedullary nail surgery (Fig. 1a). The x-ray also showed right AFSR. CT performed before the AFF event showed no bone metastasis in the femur. The patient received the last dose of denosumab treatment at 20 years after initial diagnosis and continued to receive chemotherapy at cut-off date.
Fig. 1.
Radiological findings of atypical femoral fracture. a X-ray images of Case 1. White arrow shows atypical femoral stress reaction (AFSR) on the right femur. X-ray of the left femur at the time of the AFF event and after intramedullary nail surgery. b X-ray images of Case 2. White arrow shows AFSR in the left femur. c X-ray and PET/CT images of Case 3. The upper images show bilateral AFSR and the middle image shows no metastasis in either femur. The lower images are x-rays obtained after prophylactic intramedullary nail fixation surgery. d X-ray images of Case 4. The upper images show left AFF and right AFSR. The lower images are X-rays after intramedullary nail fixation surgery on both sides. e X-ray, MRI and PET/CT images of Case 5. The upper left image is an x-ray showing left AFSR and upper right image is an MR image of the same region. The lower left image is a PET/CT image showing no evidence of malignancy and the lower right image is hematoxylin and eosin staining of fracture tissue from Case 5 (× 400). The section shows fragmented bone tissue, fibrous tissue, calcification, and a little bone marrow tissue
Case 2
A patient who underwent partial resection of the right breast and axillary LN dissection for breast cancer; the tumor was ER/PR-negative and HER2-negative. The patient received radiation therapy at 50 Gy, but no adjuvant chemotherapy. At 9 years after initial diagnosis, local recurrence was detected, which was resected, followed by no adjuvant treatment. Local recurrence was detected in the left breast and left mastectomy was performed. Metastatic lesions were seen in the skin and sternum, and the patient was initiated on treatment with an LH-RH analog + tamoxifen and a bisphosphonate at 2 years after the second surgery. The bisphosphonate was switched into denosumab. The patient was started on an LH-RH analog + anastrozole after detection of a lung metastasis, and on exemestane + everolimus after detection disease progression. The patient noticed pain in the left hip, but hip x-ray taken at a neighborhood clinic revealed no abnormalities. The patient lost his/her balance and the hip pain worsened. PET/CT revealed no abnormal uptake in the area. Radiographs of left femur showed thickening of the lateral cortex. The patient was diagnosed as having left AFF and underwent prophylactic surgery after 47 doses of denosumab (Fig. 1b) at 18 years after initial diagnosis. MRI revealed bone metastasis in the right femur. After the AFF event, the patient stopped to receive denosumab treatment and continued to received hormone therapy. The patient died due to progression of breast cancer at 20 years after initial diagnosis.
Case 3
A patient was diagnosed as having invasive ductal carcinoma of the right breast. Partial resection of the right breast with axillary LN dissection was performed, and on histopathology, the tumor was staged as pT1N1M0. The tumor was ER/PR-positive, and negative for HER2 overexpression. The patient was followed up with no adjuvant treatment. Tumor recurrence with bone metastasis in the 12th thoracic vertebra (Th12) was detected at 10 years after initial diagnosis, and radiation therapy at 39 Gy/13 Fr was performed. The patient was also treated with arimidex and a bisphosphonate, and treatment with denosumab 120 mg monthly was started. Arimidex was changed to tamoxifen because new bone lesions were detected. At 15 years after initial diagnosis, the patient complained of persistent hip pain after a fall, but PET/CT revealed no abnormal uptake in the area. An x-ray of the hip joint showed lateral femoral thickening on both sides, and the patient was diagnosed as having bilateral symptomatic AFSR after 45 doses of denosumab. Prophylactic intramedullary nail fixation surgery was performed (Fig. 1c). Denosumab administration was resumed at 2 months after the operation. No other skeletal event was occurred and the patient continued to receive hormone therapy at cut-off date.
Case 4
A patient was diagnosed as having invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast; the clinical stage was cT3N1M0 and the tumor was positive for ER, negative for PR, and positive for HER2 overexpression. The patient received neoadjuvant chemotherapy involving 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide plus epirubicin, followed by paclitaxel and trastuzumab. Partial resection of the left breast and axillary LN dissection were performed, and the pathological stage of the tumor was pT1N1M0. The patient received radiation therapy at 60 Gy and trastuzumab every 3 weeks for a year. Letrozole and zoledronic acid were also administered. At 4 years after initial diagnosis, tumor recurrence was detected in the sternum and parasternal lymph nodes, and the patient was treated with trastuzumab plus toremifene. Zoledronic acid was switched into denosumab 120 mg monthly. Several regimens for further relapses followed, including capecitabine + lapatinib, pertuzumab + trastuzumab + docetaxel, trastuzumab emtansine, and pertuzumab + trastuzumab + vinorelbine. The patient developed pain in the left hip joint and difficulty in walking at 8 years after initial diagnosis, however, an MRI of the pelvis revealed no abnormalities. MRI of the lumbar spine showed a lesion which was suspected as being a metastasis. Also, a high intensity area was seen in the proximal aspect of the thigh bone and metastasis was suspected. There was no pain in those lesions and a corset was prescribed for prevention of fracture. The patient accidentally turned over and was diagnosed as having left AFF after 46 doses of denosumab treatment. Intramedullary nail fixation was performed and histopathology showed no evidence of malignancy. An x-ray showed right lateral femoral thickening and stress reaction was suspected. Since load on the right femur was not recommended in this situation, prophylactic intramedullary nail fixation surgery of the right femur was performed. Denosumab administration was resumed at 4 months after the operation (Fig. 1d). No other skeletal event was occurred and the patient was admitted to hospice at 9 years after diagnosis.
Case 5
A patient with a past history of breast cancer who was diagnosed as having with ALK mutation-positive NSCLC, stage cT3N3M0. The patient received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with curative intent, with 4 cycles of cisplatin and vinorelbine. At 1 year after diagnosis, the patient was diagnosed as having relapse with lung metastases which were positive for ALK mutation, and was started on crizotinib treatment. PET/CT showed intense uptake in Th12 and monthly denosumab treatment at 120 mg was started. The patient had a past history of breast cancer and had previously received alendronate treatment for osteoporosis prior to the denosumab treatment. After 3 years after initial diagnosis, the patient felt pain in the left hip. Since the pain gradually became worse, MRI was performed, which showed left AFSR. No abnormal FDG uptake in the area was detected on PET/CT (Fig. 1e). Although orthopedic surgeons recommended prophylactic surgery for the left AFSR, the patient did not wish to undergo the surgery. However, the patient was diagnosed as having AFF in the left femur at 5 months after the diagnosis of left AFSR, after 15 doses of denosumab, and underwent open reduction and internal fixation surgery. Histopathological examination revealed fragmented bone tissue and fibrous tissue, consistent with fracture, and there was no evidence of malignancy (Fig. 1e). After the surgery, the patient did not resume denosumab treatment. The patient continued to receive crizotinib treatment without any other skeletal event at cut-off date.
Analysis of medical records and pharmacy database
The incidence rates of AFF in the 277 patients is shown in Table 6. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate the relationship between potential risk factors and the risk of AFF, which showed that the number of doses of denosumab and prior zoledronic acid treatment were correlated with the risk of development of AFF (p = 0.0057 and 0.0151, respectively) (Table 6). Similar results of Fisher’s exact test were obtained in the breast cancer patient group. A larger number of denosumab doses and prior zoledronic acid treatment were correlated with the development of AFF in the breast cancer patients (p = 0.01 and 0.0062, respectively). (data not shown).
Table 6.
Fisher’s exact test for AFF in univariate analysis
| Category | Incidence rate (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All | 0.018 (0.006–0.042) | ||
| Primary disease | Breast | 0.025 (0.007–0.064) | 0.3968 |
| Other | 0.008 (0–0.046) | ||
| Stage at diagnosis | Stage 1–2 | 0.013 (0–0.069) | 1 |
| Stage 3–4 | 0.014 (0.002–0.051) | ||
| Gender | Female | 0.027 (0.009–0.063) | 0.1713 |
| Male | 0 (0–0.039) | ||
| Age | < 65 | 0.023 (0.005–0.065) | 0.6716 |
| > = 65 | 0.014 (0.002–0.049) | ||
| Metastatic site: liver | No | 0.03 (0.01–0.068) | 0.1601 |
| Yes | 0 (0–0.034) | ||
| Metastatic site: lung | No | 0.013 (0.002–0.045) | 0.6548 |
| Yes | 0.025 (0.005–0.072) | ||
| Metastatic site: lymph node | No | 0.023 (0.005–0.066) | 0.669 |
| Yes | 0.014 (0.002–0.049) | ||
| Metastatic site: femur | No | 0.021 (0.007–0.049) | 1 |
| Yes | 0 (0–0.086) | ||
| Number of denosumab doses | < 10 | 0 (0–0.027) | 0.0605 |
| > = 10 | 0.035 (0.012–0.081) | ||
| Number of denosumab doses | < 25 | 0.005 (0–0.025) | 0.0057 |
| > = 25 | 0.074 (0.021–0.179) | ||
| Prior zoledronic acid treatment | No | 0.006 (0–0.033) | 0.0151 |
| Yes | 0.071 (0.02–0.173) |
The cumulative incidence curve for the association between the duration of denosumab treatment and the occurrence of AFF events is shown in Fig. 2. The curve suggests that patients who had received denosumab treatment for more than 42 months were at a higher risk for AFF events than those who had received the drug for shorter durations.
Fig. 2.
Cumulative frequency curve of atypical femoral fracture events in patients with bone metastasis receiving denosumab 120 mg monthly
Systematic review
We conducted a search of PubMed and performed a systematic review to identify the risk factors for AFF and the optimal management method for this condition. The search terms used were “atypical femoral fracture” and “denosumab”. Figure 3 shows a flow diagram of the literature search and study selection process. The number of articles identified through PubMed using the keywords “atypical femoral fracture and denosumab” was 81. Articles which were not full-text articles or did not refer to denosumab use for bone metastasis were excluded. Two oncologists individually reviewed 70 articles and found that 7 cases of AFF in patients receiving denosumab treatment for bone metastasis were available for analysis. Table 7 shows the clinical features of these cases [22–27]. The primary disease in 5 of these 7 cases was breast cancer; the other two cases had thyroid cancer or prostate cancer. The majority of the patients were female. Four patients had received prior bisphosphonate therapy with drugs such as zoledronic acid, alendronate, pamidronate or risedronate. The duration of denosumab treatment at the time of the AFF event was 18 to 54 months, and three of the patients (43%) had received more than 42 monthly doses.
Fig. 3.
Flow diagram of the literature search and study selection process
Table 7.
Clinical features of AFF cases published in the literature
| Journal | Age/Gender | Primary disease | Exposure to other BMA | Duration of denosumab treatment | Diagnosis | Operation (treatment) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang et al. The oncologist (2017) | 70/F | Breast Ca. | Alendronate, Risedronate | 23 months | Rt. AFF | Intramedullary rod placement |
| Ota et al. Breast Cancer (2017) | 73/F | Breast Ca. | Zoledronic acid | 54 months | Bilateral AFF | |
| Sugihara et al. Clin Nucl Med (2018) | 59/F | Breast Ca. | None | 4 years (48 months) | Rt. impending AFF or AFSR | |
| Koizumi et al. Clin Nucl Med (2017) | 53/F | Thyroid Ca. | Bisphosphonate | 1.5 years (18 months) | Lt. impending AFF | |
| Tateiwa et al. Journal of orthopaedic surgery (2017) | 52/F | Breast Ca. | Pamidronate, Zoledronate | 2 years and 3 months (27 months) | Bilateral AFF | Intramedullary nail was placed |
| Austin et al. Acta Orthopedica (2017) | 75/F |
Breast Ca. NSCLC |
None | 2 years (24 months) | Bilateral AFF | Intramedullary fixation |
| 86/M | Prostate Ca. | None | 3.5 years (42 months) | Rt. AFF |
Discussion
The risk for AFF associated with BP and denosumab treatment remains a concern, despite the proven efficacy of these drugs in preventing SREs. Although patients with incomplete AFF often complain of thigh pain, the condition can easily go undiagnosed or be misdiagnosed before it becomes a complete fracture. Screening for AFF with plain radiographs in high-risk patients receiving denosumab therapy may help prevent complete AFF and encourage early prophylactic surgery. It is also important to note that AFF is often bilateral.
The causative relationship with BPs and denosumab has not been completely elucidated, however, over-suppression of bone turnover is the likely cause of the pathologic fracture [28]. This effect extends to the remodeling of the callus formed at the fracture site, making treatment of AFF sometimes challenging, with higher rates of delayed union and nonunion [14, 29]. Treatment guidelines for AFF have not been established and whether prophylactic surgery or conservative treatment should be chosen for incomplete AFF remains a matter of debate. Yet, non-operative treatment does not appear to be a reliable option, as the treatment fails in nearly half of the cases, eventually necessitating surgery. Koh et al. reported a total of 159 incomplete AFFs initially treated non-operatively, of which only 45% healed after the non-operative treatment [28]. A total of 47% of the cases were eventually treated operatively; 20% showed progression to complete fracture within a mean time from incomplete to complete fracture of 6 months; 27% were treated for pain relief. The remaining 8% showed failure of healing during follow up. Non-operative treatments include partial weight bearing, discontinuation of BPs, prescription of calcium and vitamin D, and teriparatide therapy, which may often be unsuitable for patients with metastasis.
We reviewed the data of the five patients who developed AFF and/or AFSR needing surgical intervention among the 277 patients who had received monthly denosumab treatment at 120 mg (corresponding to an incidence rate of 1.8%). The age range was 45 to 67 years, and cases 1–4, with breast cancer, had received more than 45 doses (42 months) of denosumab treatment for bone metastasis and had a history of prior zoledronic acid treatment. We could not find any obvious risk factor for AFF in case 5. There has been only one report of AFF in the context of higher-dose/more frequent denosumab therapy for metastatic bone disease. Yang, et al. reported an incidence rate of AFF in this context of 0.4% (1/253) and of AFSR of 4.5% (3/66) [22]. Although this previous report did not evaluate the risk factors for AFF as there was only a single event, our analysis in this multi-center retrospective study suggested that prior zoledronic acid treatment and long-term use of denosumab treatment, especially more than 45 doses (3.5 years), were correlated with the risk of development of AFF. This is compatible with the report that a longer duration of bisphosphonate therapy or denosumab for osteoporosis is an important risk factor for AFF events. We reviewed the data of 277 patients, a larger number of patients as compared to all previous reports. This is clinically meaningful inasmuch as this study suggests that the risk of this adverse event with denosumab treatment may have increased with the increased survival time of cancer patients due to the development of novel anti-cancer drugs as recently demonstrated, for example, for breast cancer patients.
We systematically reviewed the data to identify the risk factors for AFF and the optimal management method for this condition. Only one article has reported the incidence rate of AFF in this context (only one patient developed AFF in that study) [22]. We reviewed 70 articles and found seven cases of AFF among the patients with bone metastasis who had received denosumab treatment. No study until now has evaluated the risk factors for AFF events in patients receiving denosumab treatment for bone metastasis. The duration of denosumab treatment was more than 42 months in about a half of these seven cases. Also, more than a half of the cases had a history of previous bisphosphonate therapy, including with zoledronic acid, which was compatible with our results.
Our study had limitations. First, this was a retrospective study, therefore, selection bias could have influenced the incidence rate. The final incidence of 1.8% of the AFF rate is too small to draw conclusion. However, this was the largest retrospective study until date and the first study to evaluate the risk factors for AFF in patients with bone metastasis. Second, we did not perform screening skeletal imaging tests or vitamin D levels before denosumab administration, which means the baseline skeletal condition was not evaluated. Third, although we reviewed the history of prior use of zoledronic acid, the duration of treatment with zoledronic acid or other bisphosphonates was not reviewed. Forth, publication bias in the systematic review could not be excluded and we could not conduct statistical analysis due to limited statistical data.
In conclusion, this multi-center retrospective study showed that the incidence rate of AFF or symptomatic AFSR in the 277 patients who had received monthly denosumab (120 mg) treatment for bone metastasis was 1.8%. Our analyses also suggested that long-term use of denosumab and prior use of zoledronic acid were risk factors for AFF events. We are aware that this is a retrospective study and there are many limitations. Further accumulation of data is needed for more precise evaluation of AFF in patients with bone metastasis receiving denosumab therapy.
Conclusions
This multi-center retrospective study found the incidence rate of AFF events was 1.8% among 277 cancer patients who had received monthly denosumab treatment. Long-term denosumab treatment and prior zoledronic acid treatment were identified as risk factors for the development of AFF.
Acknowledgments
We thank the patients included in this study. K. Nonogaki, E. Ozeki, H. Sato, K. Igaki, K. Akiyama, M. Takeshita and A. Sasaki contributed to the data management.
Abbreviations
- AFF
Atypical femoral fracture
- AFSR
Atypical femoral stress reaction
- ASBMR
American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
- BPs
Bisphosphonates
- ER
Estrogen receptor
- FDG
Fluorodeoxyglucose
- HER2
Human epidermal growth factor receptor type2
- LH-RH
Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone
- LN
Lymph node
- MRI
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PET/CT
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography
- PR
Progesterone receptor
- RANKL
Receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand
- SREs
Skeletal-related events
- Th
Thoracic vertebra
Author’s contributions
MT and OY contributed to collecting data and writing the manuscript. OY was a major contributor in analyzing and interpreting the patient data. RK, JM, KK and YM contributed the design of this work. TU, CK, YT and NT contributed the interpretation of data. TS, HK, NB, HI and TT contributed the draft of this work and revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by a Research fund from Mutual Aid Medical Society (#469). The role of the funding body: in collection of data, analysis software and writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Opt-out consent was obtained instead of informed consent according to Institutional Review Board of Toranomon Hospital.
Competing interests
Toshimi Takano has competing interest with Daiichi-Sankyo, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and Eisai. Other members have no competing interests to declare.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kohno N, Aogi K, Minami H, Nakamura S, Asaga T, Iino Y, et al. Zoledronic acid significantly reduces skeletal complications compared with placebo in Japanese women with bone metastases from breast cancer: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3314–3321. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Simeone J, Knight RD, Mellars K, et al. Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer. 2000;88(5):1082–1090. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1082::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rosen LS, Gordon DH, Dugan W, Jr, Major P, Eisenberg PD, Provencher L, et al. Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases in breast carcinoma patients with at least one osteolytic lesion. Cancer. 2004;100(1):36–43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, et al. Long-term efficacy of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(11):879–882. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):813–822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Henry D, Vadhan-Raj S, Hirsh V, von Moos R, Hungria V, Costa L, et al. Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(3):679–687. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, Hirsh V, Hungria V, Prausova J, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(9):1125–1132. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, Henry DH, Brown JE, Yardley DA, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(16):3082–3092. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Martin M, Bell R, Bourgeois H, Brufsky A, Diel I, Eniu A, et al. Bone-related complications and quality of life in advanced breast cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(17):4841–4849. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Scagliotti GV, Hirsh V, Siena S, Henry DH, Woll PJ, Manegold C, et al. Overall survival improvement in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases treated with denosumab versus zoledronic acid: subgroup analysis from a randomized phase 3 study. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(12):1823–1829. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826aec2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, Steger GG, Tonkin K, de Boer RH, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5132–5139. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayashi K, Aono M, Shintani K, Kazuki K. Bisphosphonate-related atypical femoral fracture with bone metastasis of breast cancer: case report and review. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(3):1245–1249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Puhaindran ME, Farooki A, Steensma MR, Hameed M, Healey JH, Boland PJ. Atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures in patients with skeletal malignant involvement treated with intravenous bisphosphonates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(13):1235–1242. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shane E, Burr D, Abrahamsen B, Adler RA, Brown TD, Cheung AM, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(1):1–23. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Starr J, Tay YKD, Shane E. Current understanding of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and Management of Atypical Femur Fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2018;16(4):519–529. doi: 10.1007/s11914-018-0464-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bone HG, Chapurlat R, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwinski E, Krieg MA, et al. The effect of three or six years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(11):4483–4492. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Drampalos E, Skarpas G, Barbounakis N, Michos I. Atypical femoral fractures bilaterally in a patient receiving denosumab. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(1):3–5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.854668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Khow KS, Yong TY. Atypical femoral fracture in a patient treated with denosumab. J Bone Miner Metab. 2015;33(3):355–358. doi: 10.1007/s00774-014-0606-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schilcher J, Aspenberg P. Atypical fracture of the femur in a patient using denosumab--a case report. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(1):6–7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.885355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thompson RN, Armstrong CL, Heyburn G. Bilateral atypical femoral fractures in a patient prescribed denosumab - a case report. Bone. 2014;61:44–47. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Villiers J, Clark DW, Jeswani T, Webster S, Hepburn AL. An atraumatic femoral fracture in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis treated with denosumab. Case Rep Rheumatol. 2013;2013:249872. doi: 10.1155/2013/249872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yang SP, Kim TW, Boland PJ, Farooki A. Retrospective review of atypical femoral fracture in metastatic Bone disease patients receiving Denosumab therapy. Oncologist. 2017;22(4):438–444. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Austin DC, Torchia MT, Klare CM, Cantu RV. Atypical femoral fractures mimicking metastatic lesions in 2 patients taking denosumab. Acta Orthop. 2017;88(3):351–353. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1277412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Koizumi M, Gokita T, Toda K. Impending atypical femoral fracture in patients with medullary thyroid Cancer with skeletal metastasis treated with long-term bisphosphonate and Denosumab. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(6):463–464. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ota S, Inoue R, Shiozaki T, Yamamoto Y, Hashimoto N, Takeda O, et al. Atypical femoral fracture after receiving antiresorptive drugs in breast cancer patients with bone metastasis. Breast Cancer. 2017;24(4):601–607. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0746-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sugihara T, Koizumi M, Hayakawa K, Ito Y, Sata N. Impending atypical femoral fracture in a patient of breast Cancer with Bone metastases receiving long-term Denosumab. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(5):365–366. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000002058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tateiwa D, Outani H, Iwasa S, Imura Y, Tanaka T, Oshima K, et al. Atypical femoral fracture associated with bone-modifying agent for bone metastasis of breast cancer: A report of two cases. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2017;25(3):2309499017727916. doi: 10.1177/2309499017727916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koh A, Guerado E, Giannoudis PV. Atypical femoral fractures related to bisphosphonate treatment: issues and controversies related to their surgical management. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(3):295–302. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B3.BJJ-2016-0276.R2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Odvina CV, Zerwekh JE, Rao DS, Maalouf N, Gottschalk FA, Pak CY. Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(3):1294–1301. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.