Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2016 May 12;30(5):751–755. doi: 10.1002/jcla.21933

Resazurin Microtiter Assay for Clarithromycin Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus Group

Natalia Fernandes Garcia de Carvalho 1, Daisy Nakamura Sato 1, Fernando R Pavan 2, Lucilaine Ferrazoli 1, Erica Chimara 1,
PMCID: PMC6806693  PMID: 27169515

Abstract

Background

Mycobacterium abscessus group has heterogeneous susceptibility pattern among species. The species is most common cause of nosocomial infections. Macrolides minimum Inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination is essential for the treatment.

Methods

Thirty‐six strains were randomly selected for performing Resazurin Microtiter Assay (REMA) for clarithromycin testing in comparison to MIC test according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2011) recommendation. REMA has been used for detection of drug resistance in M. tuberculosis. Extended incubation was performed to detect induced resistance.

Results

Thirty microliters of resazurin (0.01%) was added after visually taking MIC reading. Resistance was observed in 11.1% of M. bolletti and 4.8% of M. abscessus strains; and induced resistance was detected in 77.8% and 95.2% of M. bolletti and M. abscessus strains, respectively. All strains of M. massiliense were susceptible. The samples presented same MIC value both by visual reading and through resazurin.

Conclusion

The present study showed 100% concordance between both readings, with REMA providing easier to read and report results benefit. This change in reading can also reflect on the MIC determination and report, improving the test.

Keywords: clarithromycin, Mycobacterium abscessus, resazurin microtiter assay, susceptibility testing

Introduction

Mycobacterium abscessus group is one of the “rapidly growing mycobacteria” (RGM) groups most frequently isolated from pulmonary infections. The group comprises very closely related species, but with a controversial species classification. As a matter of fact, they are named M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. bolletii, the latter encompassed the old classification of M. massiliense and M. bolletii 1. This species is also associated with nosocomial infections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, because of the environmental factor and often opportunistic nature of this species. These organisms are very resistant in vitro to most chemotherapeutic agents, leading to treatment failure 10, 11, 12. Clarithromycin and azithromycin are the main drugs recommended by the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America, as part of a treatment regimen of multiple drugs 13. However, induction of the erm(41) gene, responsible for inducible macrolide resistance, is greater after exposure to clarithromycin compared to azithromycin 14.

It is necessary to perform drug susceptibility testing to choose the appropriate treatment 10, 15 as M. abscessus group isolates have variable susceptibility to clarithromycin. In the present study, the old classification is maintained because of the different susceptibility features of the group. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommends the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) determination for clinically significant isolates, and for those recovered from immuno‐compromised patients such as HIV‐positive patients and people with malignances 13, 16. For correct MIC reading, results interpretation requires an experienced professional who understands the different characteristics among the mycobacteria species. The use of dyes, such as resazurin, can make the visual reading easier and more accurate. Resazurin is an oxidation‐reduction indicator used for the evaluation of cell proliferation and bacterial growth 17. Resazurin Microtiter Assay (REMA) was recommended in 2009 by the World Health Organization for testing susceptibility in M. tuberculosis 18. Ramis et al. 19 for the first time described the use of resazurin as a good alternative method for MIC determination in Mycobacterium species, but the detection of inducible resistance by REMA was not verified. In order to fulfill this issue, we aimed to evaluate the performance of resazurin in a determining routine MIC of clarithromycin on M. abscessus group strains from a reference laboratory in Brazil.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

During January 2010 to December 2011, we selected all M. abscessus group isolates sent to the Tuberculosis and Mycobacteriosis Branch at Adolfo Lutz Institute, Brazil, a reference laboratory. The 21 M. abscessus, nine M. bolletii, and six M. massiliense strains were originally identified by PRA‐hsp65 method 20 and rpoB gene sequencing 21. The strains were cultivated on Lowenstein Jensen and transferred to grow for 3 days on Mueller Hinton cation adjusted broth (MHC) before clarithromycin testing.

Chemicals

Clarithromycin (Sigma‐Aldrich) was prepared in dimethyl sulphoxide to obtain 10 μg/ml stock solutions and stored at –20ºC. Resazurin (Sigma‐Aldrich) was prepared at 0.01% concentration in sterile distilled water.

Clarithromycin Susceptibility Testing With Resazurin

The MIC test was performed according to CLSI recommendation and with extended incubation for 14 days to detect M. abscessus induced resistance. The same operator performed tests and readings, but readings were performed without previously known sample identification (blind reading). Briefly, 100 μl MHC was dispensed in each well of a sterile 96‐well plate, and serial twofold dilutions of clarithromycin were prepared directly on the plate by adding 100 μl of the working solution of drug to achieve the final concentration. The clarithromycin concentration range used was 0.5–64 μg/ml. The inoculum was prepared from the MHC growth, adjusted to a McFarland tube number 0.5. The suspension was diluted 1:100 and 100 μl was added to each well. Control wells were prepared with medium culture only (negative control) and bacterial suspension only (positive control). The plates were covered, sealed in plastic bags, and incubated for 14 days at 37ºC in the normal atmosphere. Visual readings were taken on days 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. After the final visual reading, 30 μl of 0.01% resazurin was added to each well and reincubated overnight. A change in color from blue (oxidized state) to pink (reduced) indicated bacterial growth and MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration that prevented the color change. If positive control maintains blue color, the plate was discharged. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 was used as control of the susceptibility test, according to CLSI recommendation.

Isolates were considered susceptible when the MICs were less than or equal to 2 μg/ml and resistant when MIC has higher values. Isolates with intermediate MICs were also considered resistant. Susceptible isolates at day 3 and resistant after day 5 were considered induced resistant.

Statistical Analysis

Sensitivity, specificity, and confidence intervals were calculated using Epi Info version 6.0.

Ethics

The present study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of IAL (CEPIAL process n. 032/2011).

Results

Thirty‐six strains of M. abscessus group had their clarithromycin susceptibility evaluated (Table 1). Twenty M. abscessus strains presented induced resistance and one presented resistance since the third day. Seven M. bolletii strains presented induced resistance, one was susceptible, and one resistant. All M. massiliense strains were susceptible to clarithromycin.

Table 1.

Evaluation of Clarithromycin Susceptibility Test, According CLSI Protocol, Through the Use of Resazurin, Comparing the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Values Read Visually (Days 3 and 14) With the MIC Values Obtained After Using the Resazurin Dye After 14 Days of Incubation

MIC
Species Samples Type of susceptibility Day 3 (μg/ml) Day 14 (μg/ml) Resazurin (μg/ml)
M. abscessus 1 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 2 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 3 R 4 >64 >64
M. abscessus 4 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 5 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 6 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 7 IR 1 >64 >64
M. abscessus 8 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 9 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 10 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 11 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 12 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 13 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 14 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 15 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 16 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. abscessus 17 IR ≤0.5 8 8
M. abscessus 18 IR ≤0.5 8 8
M. abscessus 19 IR ≤0.5 32 32
M. abscessus 20 IR ≤0.5 32 32
M. abscessus 21 IR ≤0.5 32 32
M. bolletii 22 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. bolletii 23 S ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
M. bolletii 24 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. bolletii 25 R 4 >64 >64
M. bolletii 26 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. bolletii 27 IR 1 >64 >64
M. bolletii 28 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. bolletii 29 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. bolletii 30 IR ≤0.5 >64 >64
M. massiliense 31 S ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
M. massiliense 32 S ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
M. massiliense 33 S ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
M. massiliense 34 S ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
M. massiliense 35 S ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
M. massiliense 36 S ≤0.5 4 4
S. aureus PC ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5

S, susceptible; IR, inducible resistant; R, resistant; PC, positive control.

We observed that all samples (100%) presented the same MIC value by visual reading and after the use of resazurin (Table 1). The reading of the standard strain used as a positive control had no change in the MIC value obtained in visual readings and through resazurin. CLSI recommends that the ​​MICs of this strain, for clarithromycin test, should range between 0.12 and 0.5 μg/ml after 3 days of incubation, which occurred in the initial test of the control strain (0.5 μg/ml).

Sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% for resazurin reading (95% confidence interval 85.9–100.0% for sensitivity and 51.7–100.0% for specificity), when compared to visual reading.

Discussion

The present study evidenced that use of resazurin does not affect the MIC values, but makes it more evident to read. Besides, we verified high prevalence of clarithromycin‐induced resistance in M. abscessus group. The infections caused by M. abscessus are very difficult to be treated, mainly due to the acquired resistance of those organisms 22. Clarithromycin is a very important drug in the treatment of these infections; however, several countries have reported the occurrence of induced resistance. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a clarithromycin susceptibility testing so that a physician can choose the best regimen for the patient 8, 9, 22, 23, 24

In this study, MIC was performed according to the CLSI recommendation and with extended incubation to identify a possible induced resistance. This type of resistance can solely be detected when there is an extended incubation period, as it is expressed in the presence of the drug. We observed that most M. abscessus and M. bolletii isolates presented induced resistance and that all M. massiliense isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin. These results are in agreement with those found in studies by Nash et al., Bastian et al., Maurer et al., Shallom et al., and Lee et al., all of these studies used the same methodology for the detection of induced resistance. The susceptibility test with clarithromycin extended for 14 days incubation allowed to identify the true susceptibility profile of the isolates, since 78.5% of isolates would be considered susceptible to clarithromycin, were resistant to this drug. However, visual reading can be difficult to estimate. Sometimes, a slight precipitate related to the inoculum may be confounded with a true growth, which only an experienced analyst could differentiate.

For an accurate reading, the use of resazurin was established in the present study. Previous studies have shown the use of REMA against M. tuberculosis, and concluded that this technique has high specificity and sensitivity, in addition to being simple, practical and with no requirement of sophisticated equipment, enabling deployment in laboratories with limited resources 25, 26, 27.

The evaluation of the use of resazurin showed a concordance of 100% between the visual and resazurin readings, presenting high specificity and sensitivity. Using resazurin in the susceptibility test for M. tuberculosis, Martin et al. 28 verified the robustness of the REMA with visual reading. Castilho et al. 29 tested the use of resazurin to observe MIC of linezolid and ciprofloxacin for RGM and observed good agreement with standard test.

The visual reading may not be accurate, especially when bacterial growth is very thin, making it difficult to read visually. In addition, previous validation of resazurin in MIC determination alerts for the importance of clarithromycin induced resistance in RGM 19, which is the aim of the present study. Based on this test, we verified the accuracy of resazurin reading in clarithromycin susceptibility testing, which minimizes possible reading errors enabling an accurate reading of the susceptibility testing. It also opens opportunities for the development of automated reading protocols due to the fluorescence issued.

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Carlos Henrique Camargo for revision of the manuscript. This study received financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (www.fapesp.br, FAPESP).

Grant sponsor: Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Grant number: 2013/14957‐5.

References

  • 1. Leao SC, Tortoli E, Euzéby JP, Garcia MJ. Proposal that Mycobacterium massiliense and Mycobacterium bolletii be united and reclassified as Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. bolletii comb. nov., designation of Mycobacterium abscessus subsp. abscessus subsp. nov. and emended description of Mycobacterium abscessus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011;61:2311–2313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Adekambi, T , Berger P, Raoult D, Drancourt M. rpoB gene sequence‐based characterization of emerging non‐tuberculous mycobacteria with descriptions of Mycobacterium bolletii sp. nov., Mycobacterium phocaicum sp. nov. and Mycobacterium aubagnense sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006;56:133–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Castro CM, Puerto G, García LM, et al. Identificación molecular de micobacterias no tuberculosas mediante el análisis de los patrones de restricción, Colombia 1995–2005. Biomédica 2007;27:439–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Padoveze MC, Fortaleza CM, Freire MP, et al. Outbreak of surgical infection caused by non‐tuberculous mycobacteria in breast implants in Brazil. J Hosp Infect 2007;67:161–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Esteban J, Martin‐de‐Hijas NZ, Kinnari TJ, Ayala G, Fernádez‐Roblas R, Gadea I. Biofilm development by potentially pathogenic non‐pigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Duarte RS, Lourenço MC, Fonseca LD, et al. An epidemic of postsurgical infections caused by Mycobacterium massiliense . J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:2149–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Medjahed H, Gaillard J, Reyrat J. Mycobacterium abscessus: A new player in the mycobacterial field. Trends Microbiol 2010;18:117–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Maurer FP, Rüegger V, Ritter C, Bloemberg GV, Böttger EC. Acquisition of clarithromycin resistance mutations in the 23S rRNA gene of Mycobacterium abscessus in the presence of inducible erm(41). J Antimicrob Chemother 2012;67:2606–2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Shallom SJ, Gardina PJ, Timohy GM, et al. New rapid scheme for distinguishing the subspecies of the Mycobacterium abscessus group and identification of Mycobacterium massiliense with inducible clarithromycin resistance. J Clin Microbiol 2013;51:2943–2949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Petrini B. Mycobacterium abscessus: An emerging rapid‐growing potential pathogen. APMIS 2006;114:319–328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Groote MAD, Huitt G. Infections due to rapidly growing mycobacteria. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42:1756–1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gayathri R, Lily TK, Deepa P, Mangal S, Madhavan HN. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Postgrad Med 2010;56:76–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown‐Elliott BA, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:367–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Stout, JE , Floto, RA . Treament of Mycobacterium abscessus: All macrolides are equal, but perhaps some are more equal than others. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;186:822–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Huang Y, Liu M, Shen G, et al. Clinical outcome of Mycobacterium abscessus infection and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2010;43:401–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes, Approved Standard M24‐A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mann CM, Markham JL. A new method for determining the minimum inhibitory concentration of essential oils. J App Microbiol 1998;84:538–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. World Health Organization . Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Tuberculosis: Report on Conclusions and Recommendations. Geneva: WHO; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ramis IB, Cnockaert M, von Groll A, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of rapidly growing mycobacteria using the rapid colorimetric method. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;34:1403–1413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Chimara, E. , Ferrazoli, L. , Ueky, S. Y. , et al. Reliable identification of mycobacterial species by PCR restriction enzyme analysis (PRA)‐hsp65 in a reference laboratory and elaboration of a sequence‐based extended algorithm of PRA‐hsp65 patterns. BMC Microbiol 2008;8:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Adékambi T, Colson P, Drancourt M. rpoB‐based identification of nonpigmented and late‐pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:5699–5708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bastian S, Veziris N, Roux A, et al. Assessment of clarithromycin susceptibility in strains belonging to the Mycobacterium abscessus group by erm(41) and rrl sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:775–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Nash KA, Brown‐Elliot BA, Wallace Jr RJ. A novel gene, erm(41), confers inducible macrolídeo resistance to clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus from Mycobacterium chelonae . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009;53:1367–1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lee SH, Yoo HK, Kim SH, et al. The drug resistance profile of Mycobacterium abscessus group strains from Korea. Ann Lab Med 2014;34:31–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Palomino JC, Martin A, Camacho M, Ghuerra H, Swings J, Portaels F. Resazurin microtiter assay plate: Simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:2720–2722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Martin A, Camacho M, Portaels F, Palomino JC. Resazurin microtiter assay plate testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibilities to second‐line drugs: Rapid, simple and inexpensive method. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:3616–3619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Montoro E, Lemus D, Echemendia M, Martin A, Portaels F, Palomino JC. Comparative evaluation of the nitrate reduction assay, the MTT test, and the resazurin microtiter assay for drug susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:500–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Martin A, Morcillo N, Lemus D, et al. Multicenter evaluation of colorimetric assays using MTT and resazurin for rapid susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first‐line drugs. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2005;9:901–906. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Castilho AL, Caleffi‐Ferracioli KR, Canezin PH, Dias Siqueira VL, de Lima Scodro RB, Cardoso RF. Detection of drug susceptibility in rapidly growing mycobacteria by resazurin broth microdilution assay. J Microbiol Methods 2015;111:119–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES