Abstract
Background
Hyperhomocysteinemia in breast cancer (BC) patients can be a risk factor for thromboembolic events. This study aimed to evaluate homocysteine and its cofators (folic acid and vitamin B12) concentrations and platelet count at diagnosis of BC, 3 and 6 months after the beginning of chemotherapy treatment and to correlate them with clinical data.
Methods
Thirty‐five BC patients were included; blood samples were obtained by venipuncture. Plasmatic Hcy and cofactors concentrations were measured by competitive chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay method. Platelet count was done using an automated analyzer. Statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS.
Results
During chemotherapy, homocysteine (P = 0.032) and vitamin B12 (P < 0.001) concentrations increased, while folate and platelets decreased (P < 0.001). Among the clinical data, the menopausal status showed significant positive correlation (P = 0.022) with homocysteine concentration increase.
Conclusions
Evaluation of homocysteine concentrations during chemotherapy is extremely important because their levels increase during chemotherapy treatment, thus increasing the risk of thromboembolism development.
Keywords: homocysteine, vitamin B 12, folic acid, breast neoplasms, chemotherapy and thromboembolism
INTRODUCTION
Breast cancer (BC) remains the second most frequent type of cancer in the world and the first among women. According to the National Cancer Institute (INCA) 52,680 new cases of BC were expected in Brazil for the year 2012, with an estimated risk of 52 cases per 100,000 women 1.
Several well‐established factors were associated with increased risk of developing BC such as family history, nulliparity, early menarche, advanced age, exposure to ionizing radiation, and personal history of BC (in situ or invasive) 2.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common complication in patients with cancer and the second most frequent cause of death in these patients 3, 4. The frequency of venous thrombosis in BC patients is 5–15% 5, 6 when compared to the healthy population rate of 0.1% 6.
The pathophysiology of cancer‐related thrombosis is multifactorial and complex. It can be caused by the formation of procoagulant factors by tumor cells, changes in blood flow and endothelial damage as a result of cancer or chemotherapy. The high rate of venous thrombosis in BC patients may also be explained by hyperhomocysteinemia 7, 8, an increase of homocysteine (Hcy), a sulfur amino acid obtained from methionine 9, 10.
Metabolism of homocysteine involves multiple pathways of synthesis and degradation, with the participation of important cofactors such as vitamin B6, B12, and folate 9, 10, 11.
In normal conditions, homocysteine levels are reduced due to its rapid conversion to methionine and cystathionine 9, 12. A modification of the enzymes cystathionine synthase and methionine synthase or a transient deficiency of the enzyme cofactors (folate, vitamin B12, and B6) increases homocysteine levels. The modification of hemostatic proteins (N‐homocysteinylated or S‐homocysteinylated proteins) induced by Hcy or its thiolactone, and links of homocysteine or homocysteine thiolactone to •NO metabolism seems to be the main reason of biotoxicty of homocysteine in cardiovascular diseases 13.
Treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, and venous catheterization increase the risk of hyperhomocysteinemia development. Patients undergoing surgery have at least twice the risk of deep vein thrombosis and three times the risk of fatal venous embolism than patients without cancer undergoing similar procedures 14, 15. Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy account for 13% of all cases of VTE 16. The hormonal manipulation also affects the risk of venous thrombosis and is associated with a lower risk when compared to chemotherapy 17, 18. So this study aimed to evaluate circulating homocysteine, folic acid, and vitamin B12 concentrations and platelet count at diagnosis of BC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Thirty‐five patients diagnosed and under treatment for BC at the Oncology and Thromboembolic Diseases Centre of ABC Medicine Faculty (FMABC) were recruited from February 2008 to February 2010. All patients have written informed consent and the study was approved by the FMABC Ethics Committee (011/2009 protocol). All patients were treated following the chemotherapy standard protocol (ciclophosfamide/metrotoxate and fluoroyil).
Five milliliters of peripheral blood samples were collected by venous puncture (basilic or cephalic veins) and kept in tubes containing EDTA as anticoagulant or in tubes without any anticoagulant (dry tubes). Blood samples were collected at diagnosis and after 3 and 6 months after the beginning of chemotherapy treatment.
Samples were manipulated at the FMABC Clinical Analysis Laboratory. Plasma was obtained after sample centrifugation for 10 min at 1,629 × g at room temperature and stored at −80°C until use 19
Plasma homocysteine, vitamin B12, and folic acid samples were processed by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay method using Immulite 2000® (Siemens).
Homocysteine, vitamin B12, and total folic acid measures were calculated using calibration curves obtained from known concentrations. Reference values for homocysteine are as follows: 5–15 μm/l for normal, 16–30 μm/l for moderate hyperhomocysteinemia, 31–100 μm/l for intermediate hyperhomocysteinemia, >100 severe hyperhomocysteinemia, and 200–400 μm/l for homocystinuria. For vitamin B12, reference values are 174–878 pg/ml (128–648 pmol/l), and for folic acid, 3–17 ng/ml (6–39 nmol/l) 19.
Platelet count was performed using flow cytometry analyzer ABX Pentra 120.
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17.0. Quantitative variables were described through mean, standard deviation, and median; qualitative variables were described through absolute and relative frequencies. Student's t‐test was used in order to compare the mean of two groups. Comparisons among three or more groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Variable evolution study was performed using ANOVA with repeated measures. Correlations between two variables were analyzed through Pearson correlation coefficient; when data parametric normality assumption was rejected, Spearman correlation coefficient was used. Considered power test was 95%.
RESULTS
Patients clinical data, such as tumor characteristics and treatment, are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patients Clinical Data Versus Circulating Homocysteine, Vitamin B12, Folate, and Platelet Concentration at Diagnosis
| Clinical data | Vitamin B12 (pg/ml) | Folate (nmol/l) | Homocysteine (μmol/l) | Platelet (×103/mm3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy (100%) | 282.46 | 12.47 | 9.6 | 329.26 |
| Hormone therapy | ||||
| Yes—65.72% | 245.64 | 12.14 | 10.14 | 324.91 |
| No—34.28% | 313.57 | 11.23 | 7.34 | 293.5 |
| Student's t‐test P‐value | 0.166 | 0.707 | 0.061 | 0.195 |
| Surgery | ||||
| Surgery yes—94.28% | 264.69 | 12.65 | 9.55 | 331.42 |
| Surgery no—5.72% | 383.67 | 6.3 | 6.87 | 195.67 |
| Student's t‐test P‐valuea | ||||
| Menopausal status | ||||
| No menopause—29.41% | 227.18 | 11.38 | 5.73 | 285.55 |
| Menopause—50% | 257.2 | 11.09 | 10.27 | 246.47 |
| Premenopause—20.59% | 259.75 | 10.64 | 8.3 | 342.5 |
| ANOVA P‐value | 0.791 | 0.913 | 0.022b | 0.112 |
| Axillary lymph node | ||||
| Present—65.62% | 259.91 | 12.17 | 9.04 | 319.32 |
| Absent—34.38% | 283.92 | 10.35 | 8.96 | 286 |
| Student's t‐test P‐value | 0.921 | 0.881 | 0.715 | 0.897 |
| Nuclear grade | ||||
| Grade 1—3.03% | 150 | 12 | 9.1 | 244 |
| Grade 2—57.57% | 278.95 | 12.48 | 9.69 | 320.71 |
| Grade 3—39.39% | 236.79 | 11.03 | 8.41 | 264.79 |
| Student's t‐test P‐valuec | 0.375 | 0.158 | 0.612 | 0.143 |
| Radiotherapy | ||||
| Yes—79.42% | 227.57 | 11.84 | 9.75 | 315.75 |
| No—20.58% | 406.63 | 10.85 | 6.08 | 288.5 |
| Student's t‐test P‐value | 0.063 | 0.523 | 0.202 | 0.822 |
| Histological grade | ||||
| Grade I—3.33% | 267 | 11.3 | 15.3 | 358 |
| Grade II—63.33% | 226.7 | 11.63 | 9.69 | 312.6 |
| Grade III‐5—16.66% | 148.67 | 12.83 | 5.6 | 274.5 |
| Cd1: 3—10% | 195.25 | 8.3 | 9.35 | 237 |
| Nottingham grade II—6.66% | 342.33 | 9.97 | 3.47 | 252.33 |
| Student's t‐test P‐valued |
For the criterion surgery there are only two cases under “surgery no,” making it impossible the comparison between the groups.
Statistically significant P‐value.
In these comparisons, the parameter “grade I” was not used because the sample size is too small.
No comparisons were made, since groups G1, G2, and Cd1 did not have sufficient number of samples for comparison.
A statistically significant relationship was only observed between the concentration of homocysteine and menopausal status (P = 0.022). The analysis showed that the group “no menopause” differs significantly from the menopausal group (P = 0.018) but did not differ from the premenopausal group (P = 0.562). It was also observed that homocysteine concentrations were higher in the menopausal group. Moreover, the premenopausal group did not differ significantly from the menopausal group (P = 0.798).
There was no statistically significant correlation between the remaining clinical data evaluated and the concentrations of homocysteine, vitamin B12, folic acid, and platelets. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the concentrations of homocysteine according to the tumor size at the diagnosis of the patients studied.
Figure 1.

Distribution of the concentrations of homocysteine according to the tumor size at diagnosis of the patients studied.
Variance analysis with repeated measurements has shown that there was a significant change in vitamin B12 levels (P < 0.001) during treatment. Levels at diagnosis were significantly lower than all other time points (3 months: P < 0.001; 6 months: P < 0.001) and levels at the third month were significantly higher than the sixth month (P = 0.023) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.

Mean and standard deviation values of vitamin B12 concentration, according to the time of evaluation.
Folic acid concentration at diagnosis was significantly higher than the other ones (3 months: P < 0.001; 6 months: P < 0.001). No differences were observed between the third and sixth month of treatment (P = 0.769) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Mean and standard deviation values of folic acid concentration, according to the time of evaluation.
There was a significant change in homocysteine levels (P = 0.025) during treatment. Hcy at diagnosis did not significantly differ from the third month (P = 0.067), but differed from the sixth month (P = 0.011). No differences were observed between the third and sixth month of treatment (P = 0.286) (Fig. 4).
Figure 4.

Mean and standard deviation values of homocysteine concentration, according to the time of evaluation.
There was a significant change in platelet levels (P < 0.001) during treatment. Platelet level at diagnosis did not significantly differ from the third month (P = 0.239), but it was higher than the sixth month (P < 0.001) (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.

Mean and standard deviation values of platelets concentration, according to the time of evaluation.
A negative significant correlation between homocysteine and folic acid concentrations at diagnosis was observed (Fig. 6).
Figure 6.

Scatter diagram of homocysteine and folic acid concentrations at diagnosis.
There was a negative significant correlation between homocysteine and vitamin B12 concentrations at the third month of treatment (Fig. 7).
Figure 7.

Diagram of dispersion of homocysteine and vitamin B12 concentration at the third month of treatment.
DISCUSSION
This work aimed to evaluate plasma concentrations of homocysteine, its cofactors vitamin B12 and folate, and plasma concentrations of platelets at diagnosis of BC and during chemotherapy treatment in order to verify correlations between those factors, clinical data and treatment. We verified the increase of Hcy levels when this parameter was evaluated during the treatment; we also verified a correlation between Hcy levels and cofactors (B12 vitamin and folate).
Gatt et al. 7 and Chou et al. 8 showed correlation between hyperhomocysteinemia and women with BC. However, those studies considered Hcy concentrations only at the diagnosis of the disease. In the present study, despite the fact homocysteine levels were normal at the diagnosis, we verified the increase of this amino acid during chemotherapy treatment.
The chemotherapeutic agents used in cancer are divided into classes, which are alkylating agents, antimetabolites (among them are the analogues of folic acid–methotrexate), natural products, hormones and their antagonists, and other agents 20. Their most important actions are those that affect DNA synthesis and cell division.
The anti‐DNA action of alkylating agents would lead to a reduction of folic acid and vitamin B12 concentrations, which in turn would lead to an increase of homocysteine concentration, since they are needed to metabolize this amino acid. In addition, when concentrations of vitamin B12 are inadequate, there is a functional deficiency of other intracellular forms of folic acid 20. Among the folic acid analogs, the best known is methotrexate, an inhibitor of dihydrofolate reductase, which also directly inhibits folate‐dependent enzymes in the synthesis of DNA and RNA precursors, and thus also lead to an increase of homocysteine, as described above 20. Furthermore, some neoplastic cells receptors have a high affinity to folate, and since these cells replicate extremely rapid they are extremely dependent on an abundant supply of reduced folate, an additional mechanism which explains the reduction of folic acid in cancer patients 21.
As seen in this study, vitamin B12 and folic acid concentrations decreased with the progression of treatment, and they are inversely related to homocysteine levels. This inverse relationship of plasma concentrations of homocysteine and folic acid was also verified by Gatt et al., 2007 7.
We noticed that there is a downward trend in plasma concentration of platelets during chemotherapy treatment. The increase of endothelial damage in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy would be one possible mechanism to explain the reduction of platelets in these patients, since endothelial injury leads to platelet consumption, thereby resulting in increased plasma homocysteine.
When comparing the clinical data of patients with plasma concentrations of homocysteine, folic acid, vitamin B12, and platelets, we found that there was statistically significance only between the concentration of homocysteine and menopausal status. The group “no menopause” was statistically different from the menopausal group, with higher homocysteine concentrations in the postmenopausal group. A study conducted by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 22 found that a higher estrogen status is associated with decreased total serum concentration of homocysteine (tHcy); other studies showed that estrogen hormone can reduce homocysteine in postmenopausal women 23, 24, 25. As expected, our results showed that at diagnosis, Hcy is higher in patients at menopause status (postmenopausal group); however, the Hcy concentrations in these patients increased during chemotherapy treatment. There was no statistically significant correlation between the other clinical data evaluated and the concentrations of homocysteine, vitamin B12, folic acid, and platelets.
According to De Stefano et al. 10, there is a relationship between hyperhomocysteinemia and the occurrence of VTE, but the mechanism that leads to this association is still unknown. Our data suggest that the chemotherapy treatment can lead to hyperhomocysteinemia and may thus increase the risk of thromboembolic event. Thus, homocysteine evaluation during chemotherapy is a very important parameter since its level increases during systemic treatment. Further studies should be conducted to verify the risk of thromboembolism in these patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Finally, the purpose of this study was to verify if the chemotherapy approach could interfere in Hcy metabolism. Despite the lack of patients’ thrombosis data, it is important to clarify that Hcy and its cofactors must be measured in oncology patients during chemotherapy in order to evaluate thromboembolism events.
CONCLUSION
In this present study, we observed a significant increase in homocysteine concentration 6 months after chemotherapy, as well as a significant decrease in vitamin B12, folic acid, and platelets at the third and sixth month after beginning of chemotherapy treatment in women with BC.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
FSG was supported by a UNIEMP postdoctoral fellowship. RKK was supported by UNIEMP doctoral fellowship.
Grant sponsor: FAPESP; Grant number: 2009/54343‐0 2009/54342‐4.
REFERENCES
- 1. Instituto Nacional do Câncer . Estimativa 2012: Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2012. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br. Accessed on 2013 March 10. [Google Scholar]
- 2. International Agency for Research on Cancer . Globocan 2008. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/factsheets/populations/factsheet.asp?uno=900. Accessed on 2013 March 22.
- 3. Donati MB. Cancer and thrombosis. Haemostasis 1994;24:128–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arkel YS. Thrombosis and cancer. Semin Oncol 2000;27:362–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lieberman JS, Borrero J, Urdaneta E, Wright IS. Thromboembolism associated with neoplasm review of seventy seven cases. JAMA 1961;177:542–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Green KB, Silverstein RL. Hypercoagulability in cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1996;10:499–530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Gatt A, Makris A, Cladd H, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia in women with advanced breast cancer. Int J Lab Hematol 2007;29:421–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chou YC, Lee MS, Wu MH, et al. Plasma homocysteine as a metabolic risk factor for breast cancer: Findings from a case‐control study in Taiwan. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;101:199–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Aziz DC. 1999. Thrombosis In: Aziz DC, editor. Interpretation of Laboratory Tests in Cardiology and Coagulation, first edition Santa Monica, CA: Specialty Laboratories; p 17–52. [Google Scholar]
- 10. de Stefano V, Finazzi G, Mannucci PM. Inherited thrombophilia: Pathogenesis, clinical syndromes and management. Blood 1996;87:3531–3544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. van Cott EM, Laposata M. Laboratory evaluation of hipercoagulable states. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1998;12:1141–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Neufeld EJ. Update on genetic risk factors for thrombosis and atherosclerotic vascular disease. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1998;12:1193–1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Morganti M, Carpi A, Nicolini AG, et al. Atherosclerosis and cancer: common pathways on the vascular endothelium. Biomed Pharmacother 2002;56:317–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kakkar AK, Haas S, Walsh D. Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: Outcome after cancer and non‐cancer surgery [abstract]. Thromb Haemost 2001;86:s732. [Google Scholar]
- 15. White RH, Zhou H, Romano OS. Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures. Thromb Haemost 2003;90:446–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Jeit JA, O'Fallon WM, Petterson TM, et al. Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A population based‐study. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1245–1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fisher B, Constantino J, Redmond C, et al. A randomized clinic trial evaluating tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with mode‐negative breast cancer who have estrogen‐receptor‐positive tumors. N Engl J Med 1989;320:479–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Saphner T, Tormey DC, Gray R. Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients who received adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:286–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Gascón TM, Schindler F, Oliveira CGB, et al. Avaliação do método de quimioluminescência na análise de homocisteína plasmática e sua comparação com o método de HPLC em amostras de crianças. Einstein 2010;8:187–191.26760001 [Google Scholar]
- 20. Stathopoulou A, Vlachonikolis I, Mavroudis D et al. Molecular detection of cytokeratin‐19‐positive cells in the peripheral blood of patients with operable breast cancer: Evaluation of their prognostic significance. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3404–3412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Braun S, Cevatli BS, Assemi C, et al. Comparative analysis of micrometastasis to the bone marrow and lymph nodes of node‐negative breast cancer patients receiving no adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:1468–1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pantel K, Brakenhoff RH. Dissecting the metastatic cascade. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:448–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. You F, Roberts LA, Kang SP, et al. Low level expression of HER 2 and CK‐19 in normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells: Relevance for detection of circulating tumor cells. J Hematol Oncol 2008;1:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Swaby RF, Cristofanilli M. Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer: A tool whose time has come of age. BMC Med 2011;9:43 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741‐7015/9/43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mego M, De Giorgi U, Broglio K, et al. Circulating tumor cells are associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism in metastatic breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2009;101:1813–1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
