Abstract
Important progress in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) includes the development of nucleic acid amplification techniques such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ligase chain reaction (LCR). Commercial kits are available, but they are costly, sporadic in availability, must be imported, and are economically beyond the reach of common people. To overcome this limitation, most research laboratories have standardized their in‐house‐developed PCR methods for diagnosing this infection. However, each laboratory has to spend a great deal of time and money to accomplish this. Published reports do not always elaborate the steps involved in standardizing a test so that it can immediately be reproduced in another setting. In the present study we attempted to elaborate the steps involved in standardizing a sensitive and specific PCR technique followed by hybridization with specific C. trachomatis probe to diagnose this infection in cervical, introital, and urine specimens, and used it to determine the infection rate in a clinical population. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 20:8–14, 2006. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis, diagnosis, PCR
REFERENCES
- 1. Piot P, Islam MQ. Sexually transmitted diseases in the 1990's: global epidemiology and challenges for control. Sex Transm Dis 1994;2:S7–S13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Punnonen R, Terho P, Nikkanen V, Meurman O. Chlamydial serology in infertile women by immunofluorescence. Fertil Steril 1979;31:656–659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. DeMuylder X, Laga M, Tennstedt C, Van Dyck E, Alelbers GNM, Piot P. The role of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae in Zimbabwe. J Infect Dis 1990;162:501–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Barnes RC. Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 1989;2:119–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Stephens RS, Sanchez‐Pescador R, Wagar EA, Inouye C, Urdea MS. Diversity of Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein genes. J Bacteriol 1987;169:3879–3885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Woods GL, Bryan JA. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by direct fluorescent antibody staining. Results of the college of American Pathologists proficiency testing program 1986–1992. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:483–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Taylor‐Robinson D. Evaluation and comparison of tests to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Hum Reprod 12 (Natl Suppl JBFS 2(2)) 1997;12:113–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Fedorko DP, Smith TF. Chlamydial infections In: Wentworth BB, Judson FN, Gilchrist MIR, editors. Laboratory methods or the diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases. 2nd ed Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1991. p 95–125. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Schachter J, Dawson CR. Human chlamydial infections. Littleton, MA: PGG Publishing Co.; 1978. p 187. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Schachter J, Stamm WE. Chlamydia In: Murray PR, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 6th ed Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1995. p 669–677. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bauwens JE, Clark AM, Stamm WE. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections by a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:3023–3027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Loeffelholz MJ, Lewinski CA, Silver SR, et al. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2847–2851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bass CA, Jungkind DL, Sliverman NS, Bondi JM. Clinical evaluation of a new polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimen. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2648–2653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]