Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2002 Jan 8;16(1):59–69. doi: 10.1002/jcla.2063

Variability in molecular typing of Coxsackie A viruses by RFLP analysis and sequencing

Nikolaos Siafakas 1,2, Panayotis Markoulatos 1,, Glyn Stanway 2
PMCID: PMC6807804  PMID: 11835534

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to develop an assay capable of classifying the Coxsackie A virus (CAV) prototype strains on the basis of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of 5′‐UTR‐derived reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) amplicons, and to determine how these data could be used for typing wild‐type CAV isolates. Moreover, sequencing of the amplified genomic fragments of the clinical isolates, and comparison with all the published sequences of the respective genomic region of enterovirus reference and wild‐type strains were attempted for typing of the isolates. Twenty‐four prototype CAV strains from the 23 currently recognized serotypes were studied; most of them were successfully differentiated with the aid of four restriction endonucleases: HaeIII, HpaII, DdeI, and StyI. It was not possible to differentiate between CAV5, 7, and 16, or between CAV15 and 18 in this way, but the members of each of these two groups were satisfactorily differentiated with the aid of single‐strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of their RT‐PCR amplicons. Fifteen clinical isolates, 13 of them of known CAV serotype, were also studied with the same four endonucleases and the results were compared with the data obtained from the RFLP analysis of the reference strains. The experimental results showed that only two clinical samples of previously known identity had an identical restriction pattern with the respective prototype strains. The sequences of the amplicons of the clinical isolates had the greatest percentage of alignment with enterovirus strains of a different serotype, indicating variability in the 5′‐UTR and the inability to use the whole sequence of the amplicons for typing CAVs. The significance of the findings in relation to the possible usefulness of the RFLP‐based method is discussed. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 16:59–69, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: Coxsackie A viruses, 5′‐UTR, RT‐PCR/RFLP, sequencing

REFERENCES

  • 1. Hyypiä T, Stanway G. 1993. Biology of Coxsackie A viruses. Adv Virus Res 42:343–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Melnick JL. 1996. Enteroviruses: polioviruses, coxsackieviruses, echoviruses and newer enteroviruses In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, et al, editors. Virology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott‐Raven; p 655–712. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yolken RH, Torsch VM. 1981. Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for detection and identification of coxsackieviruses A. Infect Immun 31:742–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Lee TW, Megson B, Kurtz JB. 1996. Enterovirus typing by immune electronmicroscopy. J Med Microbiol 44:151–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Klespies SL, Cebula DE, Kelley CL, Galehouse D, Maurer CC. 1996. Detection of enteroviruses from clinical specimens by spin amplification shell vial culture and monoclonal antibody assay. J Clin Microbiol 34:1465–1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rigonan AS, Mann L, Chonmaitree T. 1998. Use of monoclonal antibodies to identify serotypes of enterovirus isolates. J Clin Microbiol 36:1877–1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Van Doornum GJJ, De Jong JC. 1998. Rapid shell vial culture technique for detection of enteroviruses and adenoviruses in fecal specimens: comparison with conventional virus isolation method. J Clin Microbiol 36:2865–2868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Miyamura K, Takeda N, Tanimura M, et al. 1990. Evolutionary study of the coxsackievirus A24 variant causing acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis by oligonucleotide mapping analysis of RNA genome. Arch Virol 114:37–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. O’Neil KM, Pallansch MA, Winkelstein JA, Lock TM, Modlin JF. 1988. Chronic group A coxsackievirus infection in agammaglobulinemia: demonstration of genomic variation of serotypically identical isolates persistently excreted by the same patient. J Infect Dis 157:183–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mulders MN, Koopmans MPG, van der Avoort HGAM, van Loon AM. 1995. Detection and characterization of polioviruses—the molecular approach In: Becker Y, Darai G, editors. PCR: protocols for diagnosis of human and animal virus diseases. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag; p 137–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Olive DM, Al‐Mufti S, Al‐Mulla W, et al. 1990. Detection and differentiation of picornaviruses in clinical samples following genomic amplification. J Gen Virol 71:2141–2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Balanant J, Guillot S, Candrea A, Delpeyroux F, Crainic R. 1991. The natural genomic variability of polioviruses analysed by a restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Virology 184:645–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Georgopoulou A, Markoulatos P, Spyrou N, Vamvakopoulos NC. 2000. Improved genotyping vaccine and wild‐type poliovirus strains by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis: clinical diagnostic implications. J Clin Microbiol 38:4337–4342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jung YT, Kim GR, Lee SR, Paik SY. 1998. Rapid subgrouping of nonpolio enteroviruses associated with aseptic meningitis by RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism) assay. Mol Cells 8:330–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Kuan MM. 1997. Detection and rapid differentiation of human enteroviruses following genomic amplification. J Clin Microbiol 35:2598–2601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Schweiger B, Schreier E, Bothig B, Lopez‐Pila JM. 1994. Differentiation of vaccine and wild‐type polioviruses using polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. Arch Virol 134:39–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Takeda N, Sakae K, Agboatwalla M, Isomura S, Hondo R, Inouye S. 1994. Differentiation between wild and vaccine‐derived strains of poliovirus by stringent microplate hybridization of PCR products. J Clin Microbiol 32:202–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fujioka S, Koide H, Kitaura Y, Duguchi H, Kawamura K. 1995. Analysis of enterovirus genotypes using single‐strand conformation polymorphisms of polymerase chain reaction products. J Virol Methods 51:253–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. World Health Organization . 1996. Polio lab network. Vol. 2. 1.
  • 20. Zoll GJ, Melchers WJG, Kopecka H, Jambroes G, van der Poel HJA, Galama JMD. 1992. General primer‐mediated polymerase chain reaction for detection of enteroviruses: application for diagnostic routine and persistent infections. J Clin Microbiol 30:160–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Siafakas N, Georgopoulou A, Markoulatos P, Spyrou N, Stanway G. 2001. Molecular detection and identification of an enterovirus during an outbreak of aseptic meningitis. J Clin Lab Anal 15:87–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Siafakas N, Georgopoulou A, Markoulatos P, Spyrou N. 2000. Isolation of polioviruses and other enteroviruses in South Greece between 1994 and 1998. J Clin Lab Anal 14:157–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hayashi K. 1992. PCR‐SSCP: a method for detection of mutations. GATA 9:73–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hyypiä T, Hovi T, Knowles NJ, Stanway G. 1997. Classification of enteroviruses based on molecular and biological properties. J Gen Virol 78:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Pöyry T, Kinnunen L, Hyypia T, et al. 1996. Genetic and phylogenetic clustering of enteroviruses. J Gen Virol 77:1699–1717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Pulli T, Koskimies P, Hyypiä T. 1995. Molecular comparison of coxsackie A virus serotypes. Virology 212:30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Stanway G. 1990. Structure, function and evolution of picornaviruses. J Gen Virol 71:2483–2501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Maisonneuve L, Esteve V, Scart G, et al. 1999. PCR‐SSCP study of an echovirus 30 meningitis outbreak. Pathol Biol (Paris) 47:534–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES