Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2001 May 3;15(3):154–159. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1019

Evaluation of urinary rapid test for Helicobacter pylori in general practice

Toru Fujisawa 1,, Taimei Kaneko 1, Toshiko Kumagai 2, Taiji Akamatsu 3, Tsutomu Katsuyama 2, Kendo Kiyosawa 2, Tetsuya Tachikawa 4, Osamu Kosaka 4, Fusaichi Machikawa 4
PMCID: PMC6807870  PMID: 11344531

Abstract

There is increasing interest in noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. One such test, a urine‐based rapid test kit (RAPIRUN H. pylori Antibody, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) for detection of antibody to H. pylori, has been developed and is considered ideal. In addition to its noninvasiveness and safe handling—due to use of urine as a sample—the assay procedure used for the urinary rapid test is very simple. Only 10–20 minutes are required to complete an assay, and no instruments are needed. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical usefulness of this urine‐based rapid test. A total of 189 patients, including 76 patients with gastroduodenal disease, were recruited. A pair of random single‐void urine and serum samples was collected from each of the 189 patients, and antibody to H. pylori in the urine and serum samples was measured using the urine‐based rapid test kit and three commercially available serum‐based ELISA kits. For the patients with gastroduodenal disease, invasive diagnostic methods using endoscopic biopsy specimens such as culture, histology, and rapid urease test were also performed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the urinary rapid test were evaluated on the basis of the three serum ELISA results or the invasive diagnostic results. In addition, various urinalyses were performed, and the effects of substances existing in urine on the urinary rapid test results were examined. Of the 189 patients, the urinary rapid test was positive for 110 (58.2%), negative for 78 (41.3%), and invalid for only one patient (0.5%). Based on the three serum‐based ELISA results, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the urinary rapid test were 93.7, 88.9, and 92.2%, respectively. On the basis of the biopsy‐based test results, the sensitivity of the urinary rapid test was 100% and its accuracy (95.2%) was equivalent or superior to that of each serum‐based ELISA. In addition, no significant differences were observed between groups positive and negative on urinary rapid testing in any urinalysis parameter examined. The novel urinary rapid test kit evaluated in this study enables simple, rapid, and accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection, and is an ideal test method for point‐of‐care testing. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 15:154–159, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, diagnosis, urine

REFERENCES

  • 1. Drumm B, Sherman P, Cuts E, Karmali M. 1987. Association of Campylobacter pylori on the gastric mucosa with antrial gastritis in children. N Engl J Med 316:1157–1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Graham DY. 1989. Campylobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. Gastroenterology 96(Suppl):S615–S625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. 1994. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease. JAMA 272:65–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wotherspoon AC, Drtiz HC, Falson MR, Isaacson PG. 1991. Regression of primary low‐grade B cell gastric lymphoma. Lancet 338:1175–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Misawa K, Kumagai T, Simizu T, et al. 1998. A new histrological procedure for re‐evaluation of the serological test for Helicobacter pylori . Eur J Microbiol Infect Dis 17:14–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Luzza F, Imeneo M, Maletta M, et al. 1994. Isotypic analysis of specific antibody response in serum, saliva and gastric homogenates of infected patients. Gastroenterology 106:A724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Patel P, Mendel MA, Khulusi S, et al. 1994. Salivary antibodies to Helicobacter pylori: screening dyspeptic patients before endoscopy. Lancet 344:511–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Luzza F, Maletta M, Imeneo M, et al. 1995. Slivary specific IgG is a sensitive indicator of the humoral immune response to FEMS. Immunol Med Microbiol 10:281–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Luzza F, Maletta M, Imeneo M, et al. 1995. Salivary‐specific immunoglobulin G in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients. Am J Gastroenterol 90:1820–1823. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Alemohammad MM, Foley TJ, Dooley CP, et al. 1991. Is urine a suitable specimen for the detection of anti‐H. pylori IgG? Am J Gastroenterol 86:A71. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Alemohammad MM, Foley TJ, Cohen H. 1993. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Helicobacter pylori in urine by an enzyme immunoassay method. J Clin Microbiol 31:217–217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Katsuragi K, Noda A, Tachikawa T, et al. 1998. Highly sensitive urine‐based enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibody to Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter 3:4:289–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shimizu T, Akamatsu T, Ota H, Tsutomu K. 1996. Immunohistochemical detection of Helicobacter pyloir in the surface mucous gel layer and its clinicopathological significance. Helicobacter 1:4:197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ota H, Katsuyama T. 1992. Alternating laminated array of two types of mucin in human gastric surface layer. Histochem J 24:86–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. FDA, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Division of Anti‐Infective Drug Products . DAIDP points to consider document Helicobacter pylori associated peptic ulcer disease. Indication no. 25. United States Department of Agriculture, Rockville, MD, March 15, 1995.
  • 16. European Helicobacter pylori Study Group . 1997. Current European concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. The Maastricht consensus report. Gut 41:8–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Lee J, O’Morain C. 1997. Who should be treated for Helicobacter pylori infection? A review of consensus conferences and guidelines. Gastroenterology 113(Suppl):S99–S106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES