Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2003 Aug 18;17(5):155–163. doi: 10.1002/jcla.10086

Diagnosis of tuberculosis: Available technologies, limitations, and possibilities

Sanjay K Garg 1,7, R P Tiwari 1, Dileep Tiwari 1, Rupinder Singh 2, Dolly Malhotra 3, V K Ramnani 4, GBKS Prasad 5, Ramesh Chandra 6, M Fraziano 7, V Colizzi 7,8, Prakash S Bisen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6807935  PMID: 12938143

Abstract

Rapid diagnosis and treatment are important for preventing transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, the diagnosis of tuberculosis continues to pose serious problems, mainly because of difficulties in differentiating between patients with active tuberculosis and those with healed lesions, normal mycobacterium boris BCG (Bacillus Calmette Guerin) vaccinated individuals, and unvaccinated Manteux positives. Physicians still rely on conventional methods such as Ziehl‐Neelsen (ZN) staining, fluorochrome staining, sputum culture, gastric lavage, and other non‐traditional methods. Although the tuberculin test has aided in the diagnosis of tuberculosis for more than 85 years, its interpretation is difficult because sensitization with nontuberculous mycobacteria leads to false‐positive tests. There have been numerous unsuccessful attempts to develop clinically useful serodiagnostic kits for tuberculosis. A number of proteinaceous and nonprotein antigens (such as acyltrehaloses and phenolglycolipids) have been explored from time to time for the development of such assays but they have not proved to be clinically useful. It has been difficult to develop an ELISA utilizing a suitable antigen because M. tuberculosis shares a large number of antigenic proteins with other microorganisms that may or may not be pathogenic. With the advent of molecular biology techniques, there have been significant advances in nucleic acid‐based amplification and hybridization, which are helping to rectify existing flaws in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The detection of mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a promising approach for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculous infection. However, the PCR results must be corrected for the presence of inhibitors as well as for DNA contamination. In the modern era of genetics, marked by proteomics and genomics, the day is not far off when DNA chip‐based hybridization assays will instantly reveal mycobacterial infections. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 17: 155–163, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: tuberculosis; PCR; ELISA, nucleic acid amplication; reporter mycobacterial phage; γ‐interferon assay

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wolinsky E, Schaefer WB. Proposed numbering scheme for Mycobacterial serotypes by agglutination. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1973;23:182–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kolk HJ, Schuitema ARJ, Kuijper A, Leeuwen van J, Hermans PWM, van Embden JDA, Hartskeerl RA. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples by using polymerase chain reaction and the nonradioactive detection system. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2567–2575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Pao CC, Yen TSB, You JB, Maa JS, Fiss EH, Chang CH. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1992;28:1877–1880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Ginsberg AM. The tuberculosis epidemic. Scientific challenges and opportunities. Public Health Rep 1998;113:128–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Grange JM, Laszlo A. Serodiagnostic tests for tuberculosis: a need for assessment of their operational predictive accuracy and acceptability. WHO Bull OMS 1990;68:571–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Campos‐Neto A, Rodrigues, JV , Pedral‐Sampaio DB, Netto EM, Ovendale PJ, Coler RN, Skeiky YA, Badaro R, Reed S.G. Evaluation of DPPD, a single recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein as an alternative antigen for the Mantoux test. Tuberculosis (Edinbl) 2001;81:353–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brooks JB, Daneshvar MI, Fast DM, Good RC. Selective procedure for detecting femtomole quantities of tuberculostearic acid in serum and cerebrospinal fluid by frequency‐pulsed electron‐capture gas‐liquid chromatography, J Clin Microbiol 1987;25:1201–1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Brooks JB, Daneshvar MI, Haberberger RL, Mikhail IA. Rapid diagnosis of meningitis by frequency‐pulsed electron‐capture gas‐liquid chromatography detection of carboxylic acids in cerebrospinal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:989–997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. French GA, Tech R, Chan CY, Humphires MJ, Cheung SW, O'Mahoney G. Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis by detection of tuberculostearic acid in cerebrospinal fluid. Lancet 1987;II:117–119 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mardh PA, Larsson L, Hoiby N, Engbaek HC, Odham G. Tuberculostearic acid as a diagnostic marker in tuberculous meningitis. Lancet 1983;I:367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Larsson L, Mardh PA, Dham GO, Westerdahl G. Use of selected ion monitoring for detection of tuberculostearic and C32 mycocerosic acid in mycobacteria and in five‐day‐old cultures of sputum specimens from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand Sect 1981;B 89:245–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Savic B, Sobring U, Alugupalli S, Larsson L, Miorner H. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction, tuberculostearic acid analysis, and direct microscopy for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum. J Infect Dis 1992;166:1177–1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ivanyi J, Krambovitis E, Keen M. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody (TB 72) based serological test for tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol 1983;54:337–345. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Elsaghier A, Winkins AFEGL, Mehrotra PK, Jindal S, Ivanyi J. Elevated antibody levels to stress protein HSP 70 in smear negative tuberculosis. Immunol Infect Dis 1991;1:323–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Bothemley G, Swansonberk J, Potts RC, Grange GM, Kardgito T, Ivanyi J. Specificity of antibodies and tuberculosis response after occupational exposure to tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 1991;166:182–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jackett PS, Bothamley GH, Batra HV, Mistry A, Young DB, Ivanyi J. Specificity of antibodies to immunodominant mycobacterial antigens in pulmonary tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26:2313–2318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chandramukhi A, Bothemley GH, Brennam PJ, Ivanyi J. Levels of antibodies to define antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in tuberculosis meningitis. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:821–825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Florio W, Bottai D, Batoni G, et al. Identification, molecular cloning and evaluation of potential use of isocitrate dehydrogenase II of Mycobacterium bovis BCG in serodiagnosis of tuberculosis. Clin Diagnost Lab Immunol 2002; 9:846–851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Bothemley G, Swansonberk J, Britoon W, Ivanyi J. Antibodies to Mycobacterium tuberculosis specific antigen in lepromatous leprosy. Clin Exp Immunol 1991;86:426–432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nair J, Rouse DA, Morris SL. Nucleotide sequence analysis and serological characterization of Mycobacterial intracellular homologue of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19kDa antigen. Mol Microbiol 1992;6:1431–1439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Espitia C, Scirrlto E, Bttasso D, Amaro RG, Pando RH, Nacilla R. High antibody levels to the Mycobacterial fibronectin binding antigen of 30–31kDa in tuberculosis lepromatous leprosy. Clin Exp Immunol 1992;87:362–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Urdea MS. Controlled synthetic oligonucleotide networks for the detection of pathogenic organisms Vaheri A, Tilton RC, Balows editors. Rapid methods and automation in microbiology and immunology. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag, 1991. p 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pottumarthy S, Wells VC, Morris AJ. A comparison of seven tests for serological diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2227–2231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Daleine G. Preliminary evaluation of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipooligosaccharide (LOS) antigen in the serological diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV seropositive and seronegative patients. Tubercle Lung Dis 1995;76:234–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Bellete B, Coberly J, Barnes GL, et al. Evaluation of a whole‐blood interferon‐gamma release assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in 2 study populations. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34:1449–1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Vareldziz BP. Drug resistant tuberculosis lab. issues. Tubercle Lung Dis 1994;75:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Walker GT, Little MC, Nadeau JD, Shank DD. Isothermal in‐vitro amplification of DNA by a restriction enzyme/DNA polymerase system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:392–396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Mullis KB, Faloona FA. Specific synthesis of DNA in‐vitro via a polymerase catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol 1987;155:335–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Jacobs WR, Barletta RG, Udani R, et al., Rapid assessment of drug susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by means of luciferase reporter phages. Science 1993;260:819–822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kramer FR, Tyagi S, Guerra GE, Lomeli H, Lizardi PLM. Q‐beta amplification assays Vaheri A, Tilton RC, Balows A. editors. Rapid methods and automation in microbiology and immunology. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag; 1991. p 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kent BD, Kubica GP. Public health mycobacteriology; a guide for level III laboratory. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control; 1985. p 207. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Walker GT, Fraiser MS, Schram JL, Little MC, Nadeau JD, Malinowski DP. Strand displacement amplification—an isothermal in‐vitro DNA amplification technique. Nucleic Acids Res 1992;20:1691–1696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mileler N, Hernandez SG, Cleary T. Evaluation of the gene‐probe amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct test and PCR for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:393–397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Altamirano M, Kelly MT, Wong A, Bessuille ET, Black WA, Smith JA. Characterization of a DNA probe for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical samples by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:2173–2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Boddinghaus B, Rogall T, Flohr T, Blocker H, Bottger EC. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1751–1759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Brisson‐Noel A, Gicquel B, Lecossier D, Levy Frebault V, Nassif X, Hance AJ. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by amplification of Mycobacterial DNA in clinical samples. Lancet 1989;II:1069–1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cousins DV, Wilton SD, Francis BR, Gow BL. Use of polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:255–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Del Portillo P, Murillo LA, Patarroyo ME. Amplification of species specific DNA fragment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its possible use in diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:2163–2168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. DeWit D, Steyn L, Soemaker S, Sogin M. Direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens by DNA amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2437–2441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Eisenach KD, Cave MD, Bates JH, Crawford JT. olymerase chain reaction amplification of a repetitive DNA sequence specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Infect Dis 1990;161:977–981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Fries JWU, Patel RJ, Piessens WF, Wirth DF. Genus and species specific DNA probes to identify mycobacteria using the polymerase chain reaction. Mol Cell Probes 1990;4:87–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hermans PWM, Schuitema ARJ, Van Soolingen, et al. Specific detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1204–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Manjunath N, Shankara P, Rajan L, Bhargava A, Saljua S, Shrinivas. Evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Tubercle 1991;72:21–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Patel RJ, Fries JWU, Piessens WF, Wirth DF. Sequence analysis and amplification by polymerase chain reaction of a cloned DNA fragment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Clin Microbiology 1990;28:513–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Plikaytis BB, Gelber RH, Shinnick TM. Rapid and sensi‐‐qj;tive detection of Mycobacterium leprae using a nested primer gene amplification assay. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1913–1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sjobring U, Mecklenbrug M, Andersen AB, Miorner H. Polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2200–2204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Verbon A, Kuijper S, Jansen HM, Speelman P, Kolk AHJ. Antigens in culture supernatant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: epitopes defined by monoclonal and human antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1990;136:955–964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hance AJ, Levy‐Frebauit V, Lecossier D, Rauzier J, Bocart D, Gicqul B. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by amplification of Mycobacterial DNA. Mol Microbiol 1989;3:843–849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Rogall T, Flohr T, Bottger EC. Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by direct sequencing of amplified DNA. J Clin Microbiol 1990;136:1915–1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Fadda G, Ardito F, Sanguinetti et al. Evaluation of the Abbott LCx Mycobacterium tuberculosis assay in comparison with culture methods in selected Italian patients. New Microbiol 1998;21:97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Gamboa F, Dominguez J, Padilla E. et al. Rapid diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by ligase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1324–1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Jonas V, Alden MJ, Curry JI. et al. Detection and identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from induced sputum specimens using amplification of rRNA. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:2410–2416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Gladwin MT, Plorde JJ, Martin TR. Clinical application of the Mycobacterium direct test: case report, literature review, and proposed clinical algorithm. Chest 1998;114:317–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. De Wet JR, Wood KV, DeLuka M, Helinski DR, Subramani S. Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 1987;7:725–737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sumi MG, Mathai A, Reuben et al. A comparative evaluation of dot immunobinding assay (Dot‐Iba) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the laboratory diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002;42:35–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kocagoz T, Yilmaz E, Ozkara S. et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples by polymerase chain reaction using a simplified procedure. J Clin Microbiol 1993;31:1435–1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Tansuphasiri U, Chinrat B, Rienthong S. Evaluation of culture and PCR‐based assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum collected and stored on filter paper. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2001;32:844–855. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Koch R. Die Aetiologie der Tuberculose. Am Rev Tuber 1932;285–323. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Iinuma Y, Ichiyama S, Yamori S, Oohama J, Takagi N, Hasegawa Y, Shimokata K, Nakashima N. Diagnostic value of the Amplicor PCR assay for initial diagnosis and assessment of treatment response for pulmonary tuberculosis. Microbiol Immunol 1998;42:218–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES