Abstract
Urinary trypsin inhibitor (uTi) is a product of elastase‐mediated degradation of interleukin‐α‐inhibitor (I‐α‐I). Its activity increases in the urine of patients with a malignancy, inflammation, or infection, or in late pregnancy. The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of uTi in urine with that of serum quantitative C‐reactive protein (CRP) for diagnosing infection, as indicated by white cell response and clinical assessment. Ninety controls and 171 patients with various systemic infections were enrolled. We measured uTi enzymatically on a Cobas Fara (Roche Diagnostics). Patients were separated into bacterial, probable bacterial, viral, or probable viral groups based on the results of a complete blood count with differential (CBC), urinalysis (UA), and clinical assessment. In the bacterial (n=70) and control (n=90) groups, the uTi values (mean±SE) were 25.3±3.1 mg/L and 2.8±0.8 mg/L, respectively. uTi (at 2.7 mg/L) had a diagnostic sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 82% (AUC=0.889), whereas CRP (at a cutoff of 10 mg/L) had a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 96%, respectively (AUC=0.921). As a marker of infection (positive in both bacterial and viral groups), uTi had a sensitivity of 91% (AUC=0.884) vs. 89% (AUC=0.828) for CRP. Our data indicate that uTi has sufficient clinical sensitivity for screening systemic infections, and may have diagnostic value as a noninvasive test. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 18:289–295, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: C‐reactive protein, urine, elastase, WBC, inflammation, screen
REFERENCES
- 1. Hjortdahl P, Landaas S, Urdal P, Steinbakk M, Fuglerud P, Nygaard B. 1991. C‐reactive protein: a new rapid assay for managing infectious disease in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 9:3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Bonac B, Derganc M, Warber B, Hojker S. 2000. Interleukin‐8 and procalcitonin in early diagnosis of early severe bacterial infection in critically ill neonates. Pflugers Arch 440:R72–R74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Gendrel D, Bohuon C. 2000. Procalcitonin as a marker of bacterial infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:679–688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Xu SY, Pauksen K, Venge P. 1995. Serum measurements of human neutrophil lipocalcin (HNL) discriminate between acute bacterial and viral infections. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 55:125–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Fries E, Blom AM. 2000. Bikunin: not just a plasma proteinase inhibitor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 32:125–137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lin SD, Endo R, Sato A, Takikawa Y, Shirakawa K, Suzuki K. 2002. Plasma and urine levels of urinary trypsin inhibitor in patients with acute and fulminant hepatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:140–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pugia MJ, Takemura T, Kuwajima S, et al. 2002. Clinical utility of a rapid test for Uristatin. Clin Biochem 35:105–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pugia MJ, Sommer R, Corey P, et al. 2004. The Uristatin dipstick is useful in distinguishing upper respiratory from urinary tract infections. Clin Chem Acta 341:73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Merle M, Jeandel C, Belleville‐Nabet F, et al. 1992. Assessment of the clinical value of urinary trypsin inhibitory activity in elderly people. Age Ageing 21:456–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Piette A, Saba J, Bernard N, et al. 1992. Urinary trypsin inhibitory activity for the diagnosis of bacterial infection: a prospective study of 690 patients. Eur J Med 1:273–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rudman D, Chawla RK, Wadsworth AD, Nixon DW, Schwartz M. 1977. A system of cancer‐related urinary glycoproteins: biochemical properties and clinical application. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 90:286–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Dillard GHL. 1950. The trypsin inhibitor of urine in health and disease. J Lab Clin Med 36:266–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Proksch G, Routh JI. 1972. The purification of the trypsin inhibitor from human pregnancy urine. J Lab Clin Med 79:491–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kuwajima S, Matsui T, Shigeru K, et al. 1990. Automated measurement of trypsin inhibitor in urine with a centrifugal analyzer: comparison with other acute phase reactants. Clin Biochem 23:167–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bauer J, Reich Z. 1909. Ueber die antitryptische Wirkung des Harns. Med Klin 5:1744–47. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Faarvang HJ. 1959. The excretion of trypsin inhibitor in urine during normal pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 31:117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Astrup T, Strendorff I. 1955. The plasminogen activator in urine and the urinary trypsin inhibitor. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 7:239–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Noda T. 1992. The immunochemical assay of human urinary trypsin indicator and its clinical significance as an acute phase reactant. Osaka City Med J 41:489–500. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kobayashi H, Suzuki K, Sugino D, Terao T. 1999. Urinary trypsin inhibitor levels in amniotic fluid of normal human pregnancy: decreased levels observed at parturition. Obstet Gynecol 180:141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Matsuda Y, Yunohara N. 2002. Effects of urinary trypsin inhibitor in patients at risk for premature labor with a bulging fetal membrane. Fetal Diagn Ther 17:69–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Onai H, Kudo S. 2001. Suppression of superantigen‐induced lung injury and vasculitis by preadministration of human urinary trypsin inhibitor. Eur J Clin Invest 31:272–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]