Abstract
Direct HDL‐cholesterol (HDLc) assays have several advantages over other assays that are more laborious and time‐consuming. A recent College of American Pathologists (CAP) report indicates that at least 385 Beckman LX‐20 analyzers use the selective detergent (homogeneous or direct) method for analyzing HDLc. There is no published evaluation of direct HDLc assays on the Beckman platform. Here we report our evaluation of a direct HDLc assay marketed by Beckman for the Beckman LX‐20 analyzers. In general, the assay performed well; however, the total error was not within National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines. This was largely because of a significant positive bias that appeared to be due, at least in part, to triglycerides. This bias was worse at HDLc concentrations <40 mg/dL, which may make it difficult to identify a low HDLc concentration and consequently an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 18:42–44, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords: triglycerides, correlation, total error, Beckman LX20, ultracentrifugation
REFERENCES
- 1. Warnick GR, Nauck M, Rifai N. Evolution of methods for measurement of HDL‐cholesterol: from ultracentrifugation to homogeneous assays. Clin Chem 2001;47:1579–1596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chung BH, Segrest JP, Ray MJ, et al. Single vertical spin density gradient ultracentrifugation. Methods Enzymol 1986;128:181–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kulkarni KR, Garber DW, Marcovina SM, Segrest JP. Quantification of cholesterol in all lipoprotein classes by the VAP‐II method. J Lipid Res 1994;35:159–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Halloran P, Roetering H, Pisani T, van den Berg B, Cobbaert C. Reference standardization and analytical performance of a liquid homogeneous high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol method compared with chemical precipitation method. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1999;123:317–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]