Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2002 Jan 8;16(1):47–51. doi: 10.1002/jcla.2058

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction: A practical approach

P Markoulatos 1,, N Siafakas 1, M Moncany 2
PMCID: PMC6808141  PMID: 11835531

Abstract

Considerable time and effort can be saved by simultaneously amplifying multiple sequences in a single reaction, a process referred to as multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Multiplex PCR requires that primers lead to amplification of unique regions of DNA, both in individual pairs and in combinations of many primers, under a single set of reaction conditions. In addition, methods must be available for the analysis of each individual amplification product from the mixture of all the products. Multiplex PCR is becoming a rapid and convenient screening assay in both the clinical and the research laboratory. The development of an efficient multiplex PCR usually requires strategic planning and multiple attempts to optimize reaction conditions. For a successful multiplex PCR assay, the relative concentration of the primers, concentration of the PCR buffer, balance between the magnesium chloride and deoxynucleotide concentrations, cycling temperatures, and amount of template DNA and Taq DNA polymerase are important. An optimal combination of annealing temperature and buffer concentration is essential in multiplex PCR to obtain highly specific amplification products. Magnesium chloride concentration needs only to be proportional to the amount of dNTP, while adjusting primer concentration for each target sequence is also essential. The list of various factors that can influence the reaction is by no means complete. Optimization of the parameters discussed in the present review should provide a practical approach toward resolving the common problems encountered in multiplex PCR (such as spurious amplification products, uneven or no amplification of some target sequences, and difficulties in reproducing some results). Thorough evaluation and validation of new multiplex PCR procedures is essential. The sensitivity and specificity must be thoroughly evaluated using standardized purified nucleic acids. Where available, full use should be made of external and internal quality controls, which must be rigorously applied. As the number of microbial agents detectable by PCR increases, it will become highly desirable for practical purposes to achieve simultaneous detection of multiple agents that cause similar or identical clinical syndromes and/or share similar epidemiological features. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 16:47–51, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: multiplex PCR, primer‐to‐template ratio, dNTP/MgCl2 balance, PCR buffer concentration

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chamberlain JS, Gibbs RA, Ranier JE, Nguyen PN, Caskey CT. 1988. Deletion screening of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus via multiplex DNA amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 16:11141–11156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rithidech KN, Dunn JJ, Gordon CR. 1997. Combining multiplex and touch down PCR to screen murine microsatellite polymorphisms. BioTechniques 23:36–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shuber AP, Skoletsky J, Stern R, Handelin BL. 1993. Efficient 12‐mutation testing in the CFTR gene: a general model for complex mutation analysis. Hum Mol Genet 2:153–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zimmermann KD, Schogl B, Plaimauer B, Manhalter JW. 1996. Quantitative multiple competitive PCR of HIV‐1 DNA in a single reaction tube. BioTechniques 21:480–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Crisan D. 1994. Molecular diagnostic testing for determination of myeloid lineage in acute leukemias. Ann Clin Lab Sci 24:355–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Heredia A, Soriano V, Weiss SH, et al. 1996. Development of a multiplex PCR assay for the simultaneous detection and discrimination of HIV‐1, HIV‐2, HTLV‐I and HTLV‐II. Clin Diagn Virol 7:85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Casa I, Pozo F, Trallero G, Echevarria JM, Tenorio A. 1999. Viral diagnosis of neurological infections by RT multiplex PCR: a search for entero‐ and herpes viruses in a prospective study. J Med Virol 57:145–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Markoulatos P, Samara V, Siafakas N, Plakokefalos E, Spyrou N, Moncany M. 1999. Development of a quadriplex polymerase chain reaction for human cytomegalovirus. J Clin Lab Anal 13:99–105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Markoulatos P, Mangana‐Vougiouka O, Koptopoulos G, Nomikou K, Papadopoulos O. 2000. Detection of sheep poxvirus in skin biopsy samples by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction. J Virol Methods 14:214–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Markoulatos P, Georgopoulou A, Kotsovassilis C, Karabogia‐Karaphillides P, Spyrou N. 2000. Detection and typing of HSV‐1, HSV‐2 and VZV by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Lab Anal 14:214–219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hendolin PH, Markkanen A, Ylikoski J, Wahlfors JJ. 1997. Use of multiplex PCR for simultaneous detection of four bacterial species in middle ear effusions. J Clin Microbiol 35:2854–2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Harris E, Kropp G, Belli A, Rodriguez B, Agabian N. 1998. Single step multiplex PCR assay for characterization of New World Leishmania complexes. J Clin Microbiol 36:1989–1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ruano G, Fenton W, Kidd KK. 1989. Biphasic amplification of very dilute DNA samples via “booster” PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 17:5407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Brownie J, Shawcross S, Theaker J, et al. 1997. The elimination of primer‐dimer accumulation in PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3235–3241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Chou Q, Russel M, Birch DE, Raymond J, Bloch W. 1992. Prevention of pre‐PCR mis‐priming and primer dimerization improves low‐copy number amplifications. Nucleic Acids Res 11:1717–1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Dlouhy SR, Vance GH, Vogt PH. 1997. Multiplex PCR: critical parameters and step‐by‐step protocol. BioTechniques 23:504–511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Mutter GL, Boyton KA. 1995. PCR bias in amplification of androgen receptor alleles, a trinucleotide repeat marker used in clonality studies. Nucleic Acids Res 23:1411–1418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Wagner A, Blackstone N, Cartwright P, et al. 1994. Surveys of gene families using polymerase chain reaction: PCR selection and PCR drift. Syst Biol 43:250–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jackson R, Morris DJ, Cooper RJ, Bailey AS, Klapper PE, Cleator GM. 1996. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for adenovirus and herpes simplex virus in eye swabs. J Virol Methods 56:41–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Stockton J, Ellis JS, Saville M, Clewley JP, Zambon MC. 1998. Multiplex PCR for typing and subtyping influenza and respiratory syncytial viruses. J Clin Microbiol 36:2990–2995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Elnifro EM, Ashshi AM, Cooper RJ, Klapper PE. 2000. Multiplex PCR: optimization and application in diagnostic virology. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:559–570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Peter M, Gilbert E, Delattre O. 2001. A multiplex real‐time PCR assay for the detection of gene fusions observed in solid tumors. Lab Invest 81:905–912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fang P, Bouma S, Jon C, Gordon J, Beaudet AL. 1995. Simultaneous analysis of mutant and normal alleles for multiple cystic fibrosis mutations by the ligase chain reaction. Hum Mutat 6:144–151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Allain JP. 2000. Genomic screening for blood‐borne viruses in transfusion settings. Clin Lab Hematol 22:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cuzin M. 2001. DNA chips: a new tool for genetic analysis and diagnostics. Transfus Clin Biol 8:291–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ladner DP, Leamon JH, Hamann S, et al. 2001. Multiplex detection of hotspot mutations by rolling circle‐enabled universal microarrays. Lab Invest 81:1079–1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li J, Chen S, Evans DH. 2001. Typing and subtyping influenza virus using DNA microarrays and multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR. J Clin Microbiol 39:696–704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES