Skip to main content
Open Forum Infectious Diseases logoLink to Open Forum Infectious Diseases
. 2019 Oct 23;6(Suppl 2):S811–S812. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2034

2356. Increased Clinical Specificity with Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins: Reduction of Overdiagnosis Compared with Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests

Johanna Sandlund 1, Joel Estis 1, Phoebe Katzenbach 1, Niamh Nolan 1, Kirstie Hinson 2, Jennifer Herres 2, Troy Pero 2, Gwyn Peterson 2, Jeung-Mi Schumaker 2, Craig Stevig 2, Rhonda Warren 2, Tsubasa West 2, Siu-Kei Chow 2
PMCID: PMC6809751

Abstract

Background

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare-associated infections, resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Diagnosis of CDI relies on the assessment of clinical presentation and laboratory tests. We have evaluated the clinical performance of ultrasensitive Single Molecule Counting technology for detection of C. difficile toxins A and B.

Methods

Stool specimens from 298 patients with suspected CDI were tested with nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT; BD MAX™ Cdiff assay or Xpert® C. difficile assay) and Singulex Clarity® C. difficile toxins A/B assay. Specimens with discordant results were tested with cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA), and results were correlated with disease severity and outcome.

Results

There were 64 NAAT-positive and 234 NAAT-negative samples. Of the 32 NAAT+/Clarity− and 4 NAAT-/Clarity+ samples, there were 26 CCNA− and 4 CCNA- samples, respectively. CDI relapse or overall death was more common in NAAT+/toxin+ patients than in NAAT+/toxin− and NAAT−/toxin− patients, and NAAT+/toxin+ patients were 3.7 times more likely to experience relapse or death (Figure 1). The clinical specificity of Clarity and NAAT was 97.4% and 89.0%, respectively, and overdiagnosis was over three times more common in NAAT+/toxin− than in NAAT+/toxin+ patients (Figure 2). Negative percent agreement between NAAT and Clarity was 98.3%, and positive percent agreement increased from 50.0% to effective 84.2% and 94.1% after CCNA testing and clinical assessment.

Conclusion

The Clarity assay was superior to NAATs in diagnosis of CDI, by reducing overdiagnosis and thereby increasing clinical specificity, and presence of toxins was associated with disease severity and outcome.

graphic file with name ofidis_ofz360_f2113.jpg

graphic file with name ofidis_ofz360_f2114.jpg

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Session: 250. HAI: C. difficile - Diagnostic Testing

Saturday, October 5, 2019: 12:15 PM


Articles from Open Forum Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES