Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Oct 23;9:15246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51608-9

Pluronic gel-based burrowing assay for rapid assessment of neuromuscular health in C. elegans

Leila Lesanpezeshki 1, Jennifer E Hewitt 1,3, Ricardo Laranjeiro 2, Adam Antebi 3, Monica Driscoll 2, Nathaniel J Szewczyk 4, Jerzy Blawzdziewicz 5, Carla M R Lacerda 1, Siva A Vanapalli 1,
PMCID: PMC6811592  PMID: 31645584

Abstract

Whole-organism phenotypic assays are central to the assessment of neuromuscular function and health in model organisms such as the nematode C. elegans. In this study, we report a new assay format for engaging C. elegans in burrowing that enables rapid assessment of nematode neuromuscular health. In contrast to agar environments that pose specific drawbacks for characterization of C. elegans burrowing ability, here we use the optically transparent and biocompatible Pluronic F-127 gel that transitions from liquid to gel at room temperature, enabling convenient and safe handling of animals. The burrowing assay methodology involves loading animals at the bottom of well plates, casting a liquid-phase of Pluronic on top that solidifies via a modest temperature upshift, enticing animals to reach the surface via chemotaxis to food, and quantifying the relative success animals have in reaching the chemoattractant. We study the influence of Pluronic concentration, gel height and chemoattractant choice to optimize assay performance. To demonstrate the simplicity of the assay workflow and versatility, we show its novel application in multiple areas including (i) evaluating muscle mutants with defects in dense bodies and/or M-lines (pfn-3, atn-1, uig-1, dyc-1, zyx-1, unc-95 and tln-1), (ii) tuning assay conditions to reveal changes in the mutant gei-8, (iii) sorting of fast burrowers in a genetically-uniform wild-type population for later quantitation of their distinct muscle gene expression, and (iv) testing proteotoxic animal models of Huntington and Parkinson’s disease. Results from our studies show that stimulating animals to navigate in a dense environment that offers mechanical resistance to three-dimensional locomotion challenges the neuromuscular system in a manner distinct from standard crawling and thrashing assays. Our simple and high throughput burrowing assay can provide insight into molecular mechanisms for maintenance of neuromuscular health and facilitate screening for therapeutic targets.

Subject terms: Behavioural methods, Neuroscience

Introduction

The millimeter-long round worm Caenorhabditis elegans is an excellent model for investigating conserved molecular mechanisms regulating neuromuscular health and its decline with age1. Additional benefits of this model organism include 60% homology with human genes, a short life cycle, 95 body wall muscle cells similar to vertebrate muscle, and 302 mapped neurons13. Studies in C. elegans can potentially lead to insights into maintenance of neuromuscular health4, impacting a wide range of human disorders ranging from muscular dystrophies5 to neurodegenerative diseases6.

Whole-organism assays are an essential aspect of scoring neuromuscular health and studying mechanisms regulating neuromuscular function. Assays typically involve investigating C. elegans locomotion on agar plates7, where animals crawl in two dimensions (2D). Alternatively, thrashing assays that score animal swimming locomotion8 or microfluidic pillar environments that measure muscle forces have been used9,10. Additionally, sophisticated computer-vision analysis can be employed to further reveal detailed aspects of C. elegans locomotion and maneuverability in these different environments1113.

Although existing methods have revealed important aspects of neuromuscular control of animal behavior14, assay culture conditions are typically not the best representation of C. elegans natural habitat, in which animals burrow in three dimensions in soil, rotten fruit, and fluid drops15. Indeed, burrowing environments to mimic this natural habitat have been designed to better reflect true behavioral conditions1620.

3D locomotion in C. elegans is distinct from 2D locomotion because the neuromuscular control system needs to enable body twisting to generate out-of-plane motion. These roll maneuvers are essential for the animal to make turns and navigate in 3D21. Evidence is emerging that 3D locomotory studies can provide information on C. elegans genetics and neuromuscular aspects that are not evident in 2D measures16,17. For example, in mutants modeling muscular dystrophy, differences observed in their 2D crawling performance were minor compared to an obvious burrowing defect16. As a result, engaging animals in burrowing environments and scoring their locomotory prowess might provide the sensitive dynamic range of outcomes to reveal previously indiscernible phenotypes.

Burrowing capacity has been examined in agar-filled pipettes by stimulating animals to move towards the food source present at one end of the pipette16,18,22. A limitation of this burrowing assay is that the methodology requires time-consuming steps including drilling holes in the pipette (later used for loading animals and food source), followed by filling the pipettes uniformly with hot agar and waiting for them to cool. Additional challenges include injection of tens of animals into a localized spot (which may result in animal loss or damage), and visualization difficulty due to the translucency of agar and refraction at cylindrical surfaces.

Despite these limitations, the basic approach and the burrowing assay are highly valuable—stimulating animals to burrow in a dense, 3D environment offers a way to challenge the neuromuscular system that is distinct from swimming or 2D crawling that may well approximate a more natural environment than either swimming or crawling. Here we report on a novel design for burrowing evaluation that addresses the limitations of the currently described agar-based burrowing assay and enables parallel evaluation of burrowing performance of wild-type and mutant C. elegans. The method utilizes well plates and Pluronic F-127—an optically transparent biocompatible hydrogel that undergoes a sol-gel transition in a temperature range that is safe for handling C. elegans. We tested the influence of system parameters including gel concentration, height, and chemoattractant type to optimize the assay performance. In addition, we evaluate animal distribution and behavior during burrowing.

To demonstrate the flexibility and power of the assay, we show its suitability for diverse applications including (i) evaluation of muscle-defective mutants, (ii) tuning assay conditions to increase phenotypic distinction of a mitochondrial mutant, (iii) separation and recovery of fast/slow burrowers for differential gene expression analysis, and (iv) testing disease models of protein aggregation for locomotory impairment. We anticipate that this new and simple assay should provide insights into molecular mechanisms regulating maintenance of neuromuscular health, facilitate screening for pharmacological interventions, and create a path to novel discovery of therapeutic targets.

Results

Basic methodology of pluronic-based burrowing assay

To create a 3D environment for burrowing, a medium that confers no adverse effect on animal health is essential. It is a standard practice to culture C. elegans on agar (in the form of Nematode Growth Media (NGM)) plates, and thus studies so far have focused on using agar as the burrowing medium16,18,20. Although agar is an animal-friendly medium, C. elegans cannot tolerate the high temperatures (>32–40 °C) of liquid agar, and therefore execution of a burrowing assay requires forcible injection of animals into the agar after it has cooled down and solidified. The mechanical stress during injection may not only rupture the gel, but also can result in animal injury and loss as a high density of animals are introduced into a localized area. Moreover, in the published burrowing method16,18, animals are not easy to visualize due to the translucency of agar and refraction at the cylindrical surfaces of glass pipettes that are used.

Here, we introduce Pluronic F-127 (PF-127), a biocompatible thermoreversible hydrogel, as a novel 3D gel environment for a burrowing assay. PF-127 is a copolymer consisting of a hydrophobic propylene oxide block in the center and flanked by two hydrophilic ethylene oxide blocks. PF-127 has become popular for immobilizing C. elegans and for high resolution imaging due to its excellent optical transparency2327 and its highly favorable range for solid/fluid transitions.

Our current burrowing assay format uses 12-well plates, which allows for assessment of four treatments each with three replicates per plate (Fig. 1a). The optimized protocol involves loading a liquid drop (20–30 μL) of 26% w/w PF-127 at 14 oC at the bottom of the well, which forms a thin (<1 mm) gel droplet within a couple of minutes at room temperature (20 °C ± 2 °C). About 30 handpicked animals taken from culture plates are introduced on this bottom layer. We note that since the thin gel layer is equilibrated to room temperature before adding animals, they are not exposed to significant temperature shock. Next, a second viscous liquid layer of 26% w/w PF-127 is cast on top of the loaded animals to achieve a desired thickness, which gels within 5 minutes at room temperature. A chemoattractant is then placed on top of the gelled surface and the number of animals reaching the top is counted every 15 minutes for a minimum of 2 hours (See Supplementary Video S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Basic principle of Pluronic (PF-127) gel-based burrowing assay. (a) The burrowing assay is conducted in a 12-well plate; in each well, animals are stimulated to move through a gel towards a food source placed at the top. The inset shows the nematodes that have successfully burrowed and reached the food source (E. coli) at the top of the gel (See also supplementary video S1). (b) Burrowing performance of day 1 wild-type adults in the presence and absence of E. coli bacteria in 26% w/w PF-F127. Gel thickness, H = 0.9 cm. N = 39 and 35 animals in the presence and absence of bacteria, respectively. (c) Calcium imaging shows the muscle contractions as the nematode is burrowing in the PF-127 gel. Strain is HBR4: goeIs3 HBR4: goeIs3[Pmyo-3::GCaMP3.35::unc-54-3′utr, unc-119] expressing the calcium indicator GCaMP3 in body wall muscles. Images are taken with 5 s intervals. Arrow heads point to the tail that appears faded in i and ii due to the 3D locomotion. In all three images, the head is on the left. (d) Dynamic quantification of calcium signaling activity from an animal during a 10 second burrowing episode. Each pixel is 1 second apart on the x-axis.

We tested wild-type animals in the presence and absence of chemotactic stimulus, E. coli OP50 (the animal’s standard food source) (Fig. 1b). We observed that in the presence of the stimulus, the percentage of animals reaching the top surface increased with time, saturating at ≈60% after 2 hours. In contrast, without any chemotactic stimulus added to the gel surface, the percentage of animals reaching the top remained <20%. Since the assay engages the animals to burrow from the bottom toward the top, going against gravity, we also tested whether gravitactic stimulus influences the burrowing performance. We conducted a set of experiments where the well plate was turned upside down after introduction of the chemoattractant, and we found no considerable impact on the percentage of the animals reaching the gel surface (Fig. S1). Thus, the overall direction of burrowing with respect to gravity does not influence burrowing performance, and chemotactic stimulus is essential for animals to burrow efficiently towards the surface and engage in 3D locomotion.

We also confirmed that the assay can be assembled in reverse, i.e. placing the attractant on the bottom of the well plate and the animals on top, so that slow burrowers can be collected from the top if needed. The results were fairly consistent with the burrowing assay in standard conditions (Fig. S2). By the end of 2 hours, 69% of the animals in reverse condition and 67% in standard setup reached the attractant. At the same time, approximately 7% of the wild-type animals remained at the initial loading area on the top in the reverse assay, while 20% stayed on the bottom using the standard assay. In a separate experiment, we found that the stress the animals faced during the 2-hour burrowing was mostly due to the high mechanical resistance of the environment (See Supplementary Note S1, Fig. S3).

Animals twist their bodies when they navigate in the Pluronic gel environment. To visualize this 3D out-of-plane motion and concurrent muscle activity, we used transgenic animals (Pmyo-3GCaMP3.35) expressing the calcium sensor GCaMP3.35 in body wall muscles28 (Fig. 1c, also see Supplementary Video S2). As muscle contracts, calcium ions are released from the sarcoplasmic reticulum into the cytosol, where they interact with the sensor and generate signals associated with calcium elevation2830. During burrowing, we observed that the muscle cells appeared brighter on the side where the body is contracting while the other side with relaxed muscles was dark due to the momentarily low calcium activity. In Fig. 1c, the tail (arrows) appeared faded due to the animal’s 3D posture (i, ii); thereafter, the entire body emerged in the focal plane of the microscope (iii). Thus, the animals undergo 3D locomotion in the PF-127 gel environment.

To quantify the calcium activity in the gel environment, we analyzed the images when the whole animal body was in the focal plane. Figure 1d shows the dynamic quantification of calcium signaling along the body that can help us understand how the signal propagates starting from the head toward the tail. The calcium signal, visualized with the GCaMP reporter as bright green pixels, propagated from the head located on the top of the plot to the tail shown at the bottom, as the animal underwent dorsal-ventral contraction. It took about 10 seconds for the intensity wave to propagate from the head, which corresponds to an undulatory frequency of 0.1 Hz. Furthermore, we observed that the calcium signal diminished once it reached the tail, which has been previously reported in animals burrowing in agar16.

Optimization of burrowing assay parameters

To determine optimal performance for the burrowing assay, we considered several parameters. Animal performance during burrowing is expected to depend on the mechanical resistance offered by the gel. This resistance can be controlled by the gel’s mechanical properties, which in turn is governed by PF-127 concentration. In addition, the gel height dictates how far animals need to burrow. Finally, the chemotactic response can be sensitive to the type of chemoattractant used to stimulate the animals to burrow. In this section, we therefore studied the influence of gel concentration, gel height and chemoattractant choice on the burrowing performance of wild-type animals.

Gel concentration

Previous studies show that the sol-gel transition temperature decreases with increasing Pluronic concentration23,31. For example, it has been reported that at 19% w/v the sol-gel transition occurs at 24 °C, whereas at 30% w/v, the sol-gel transition occurs at 12 °C23. To identify the optimal concentration range, our criteria were: (i) the sol-gel transition must occur below room temperature; (ii) the liquid should not be too viscous to handle below the sol-gel transition because Pluronic solution needs to be transferred in liquid phase to the well plates; (iii) the handling temperature should not be far below room temperature (otherwise the gel takes too long to equilibrate to room temperature). Considering these factors, the useful PF-127 concentration range to test was between 24 to 30% w/v. For transferring the solution in liquid phase, we chose 10–14 °C, temperatures right below the sol-gel transition for this concentration range23. Our initial trials showed that the second layer gels in less than 5 minutes under these conditions.

Figure 2a shows the burrowing data for PF-127 concentrations of 24, 26, 28, and 30% w/w at a set gel height of 0.7 cm. The transfer temperature used here was 14 °C for 24, 26, and 28% w/w, and 10 °C for 30% w/w. At the 2-hour timepoint, we found that the percentage of animals reaching the top surface for 24, 26, 28, and 30% w/w was 85%, 77%, 64%, and 40%, respectively. Of note, we found the burrowing percentage plateaued after ≈60 min and 90 min for 24 and 26% w/w respectively, but did not saturate within the 2 hours for 28 and 30% w/w.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of Pluronic gel concentration and height on burrowing performance of wild-type animals. Burrowing performance in (a) four different concentrations of PF-127. N = 31, 25, 31 and 34 animals for 24, 26, 28 and 30% w/w gels respectively; H = 0.7 cm. (b) 26% w/w PF-127 at four different gel heights. N = 28, 33, 23, 28 animals for H = 0.44, 0.66, 0.80 and 1.1 cm, respectively. (c) 30% w/w PF-127 at four different gel heights. N = 31, 30, 32 and 31 animals for H = 0.46, 0.64, 0.81 and 1.1 cm, respectively. 100 mg/mL E. coli was used as an attractant.

Our observation that fewer animals reach the surface as the Pluronic concentration increases suggests that the mechanical resistance offered by the gel is an important factor determining burrowing performance. Indeed, the measured elastic modulus and yield stress of the gel increase when the PF-127 concentration increases (Fig. S4). The mechanical resistance can come from the nematode trying to overcome the yield stress to carve a hole in the gel in order to move. Also, the viscous friction along the nematode body could contribute to resistance to motion in 3D.

In sum, our results show that the mechanical resistance to burrowing can be easily tuned by modulating the PF-127 concentration. From an assay perspective, we chose PF-127 concentration of 26% w/w as the standard condition since the challenge for animal burrowing is intermediate, and the solution gels more quickly than the 24% w/w.

Gel height

With respect to gel height H, we anticipated that burrowing performance should decrease with an increase in gel height. In Fig. 2b, we indeed observed this trend when we tested gel heights of H = 0.66, 0.80, and 1.1 cm at 26% w/w PF-127 concentration. The final 2-hour burrowing percentage decreased from 85% to 60% when using gel heights of H = 0.66 and 1.1 cm, respectively. Interestingly, when we tested H = 0.44 cm, the burrowing percentage reached close to 100% within the first hour and subsequently declined as some of the animals burrowed back into the gel.

We also tested the influence of gel height at 30% w/w of PF-127 (Fig. 2c). The same decreasing trend of burrowing performance with an increase in gel height was observed. Even at the lowest height of 0.46 cm, only 68% of the animals made it to the top by the end of 2 hours, which is considerably lower than 85% in 26% w/w at the same height (Fig. 2b). The burrowing performance was the worst in the highest gel thickness we tested (1.1 cm), as less than 10% of the animals could reach the surface.

For the rest of study, we conducted burrowing assays with PF-127 concentration of 26% w/w and gel height of approximately 0.7 cm unless otherwise noted. Under these conditions, we found that the burrowing percentage at the end of two hours was 70%-80% for wild-type animals.

Chemoattractant

The main premise of the burrowing assay is to stimulate the animals to burrow from the bottom of the well plate to the top surface of the gel. Escherichia coli OP50, the typical C. elegans food source, can act as a chemoattractant to these animals32. Odorant chemical compounds such as isoamyl alcohol and diacetyl are also known to be attractive to C. elegans33. To achieve a reliable burrowing performance, a chemical stimulus with a maintained level of animal attraction over the assay time should be utilized. We therefore evaluated the burrowing performance of wild-type animals stimulated with E. coli in salt solution or odorant chemical compounds.

We tested four concentrations of E. coli varying from 100 mg/mL concentrated in liquid NGM to 0 mg/mL separately. The 2-hour burrowing performance gradually diminished as more diluted attractants were utilized in each assay (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, liquid NGM without bacteria also appeared to be attractive to the animals, which could be related to salt and/or amino acid taxis34. Although 1% diacetyl and 1% isoamyl alcohol in ethanol were clearly attractive and elicited strong burrow outcomes in 90 minutes, animals burrowed back into the gel thereafter, so attraction was not maintained (Fig. 3b). On the contrary, with E. coli as a stimulant, the animals tended to stay and feed on the bacteria layer once they reached the top surface of the gel, making it easier to sort the animals as they reach the surface. Taken together, our data suggest that E. coli at a concentration of 100 mg/mL liquid NGM is an efficacious and near optimal attractant for our burrowing assay.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Chemoattractant choice influences the burrowing performance in wild-type animals. (a) Influence of different E. coli concentration on burrowing success. Assay conditions are 26% w/w PF-127 and H = 0.7 cm. N = 35, 28, 31 and 30 animals for E. coli concentrations of 100, 50, 25 and 0 mg/mL respectively. (b) Effect of different chemoattractants on burrowing performance. Assay conditions are 26% w/w PF-127 and H = 0.75 cm. N = 38, 34, 33, 37 and 37 animals for 100 mg/mL E. coli, 1% diacetyl, 1% isoamyl alcohol, water and ethanol, respectively.

Animal locomotory and behavioral analysis during burrowing

To compare the locomotory characteristics in PF-127 gel with swimming and crawling, we examined C. elegans locomotion in a 26% w/w Pluronic gel with a layer thickness of approximately 1 mm. This thin-gel configuration restricted the significant out-of-plane motion typically observed in our standard burrowing assay and facilitated quantitative characterization of velocity and undulatory frequency at an individual animal level. We found that the velocity ranged from 0.5–1.9 mm/min for individuals with a population mean of 1.14 mm/min (Fig. 4a). These velocity scores are lower than typical values reported for crawling16,35. Likewise, the undulatory frequency range was 0.03–0.1 Hz (Fig. 4b) with a population mean of 0.07 Hz, which is also lower than the values reported for crawling and swimming16,35. The diminished locomotory metrics in the Pluronic gel suggest that the burrowing environment poses significant mechanical resistance for animal locomotion. We also observed that in the thin-gel environment, animals spend 81% of their time moving forward, 15% of their time moving backward, and only 4% of their time pausing (Fig. S5). Overall, although the gel environment does restrict some locomotion metrics compared to swimming and crawling environments, animals still successfully and continually navigate through the dense gel.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Characterization of wild-type animal locomotion in a thin Pluronic gel layer. (a) Individual animal velocity obtained by tracking the body centroid every 15 seconds. The average burrowing velocity is 1.14 mm/min. (b) Undulatory frequency of individuals obtained from the time required to complete one sinusoid body movement. The average undulatory frequency is 0.07 Hz. In (a,b) no food source was used and the assay conditions were 26% w/w PF-127 and H ≈ 1 mm. The error bars represent standard error of mean calculated from 8 time intervals per individual animal.

To further evaluate whether the stimulated burrowing behavior contains long resting phases during the journey to reach the surface of the gel, we assessed the distribution of animals across the gel height in 15 min intervals. We monitored the fraction of animals present in consecutive layers divided into thirds, with the fourth category being the top surface (Fig. 5a). Figure 5b demonstrates that the animals did not spend much time burrowing in the middle layers, meaning that once they sense the attractant, they engage in burrowing to reach the attractant on top. As the percentage of animals decreased in the loading area, the percentage of animals on the surface consequently increased. If there was no attractant on the top surface to stimulate the animals, animals preferred to not move much farther vertically from their initial location (Fig. 5c). Thus, we did not observe long resting phases (i.e., on the scale of several minutes) when animals are stimulated to burrow.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Distribution of wild-type animals during burrowing. The gel height in a well was divided into three vertical layers to monitor the number of animals in each. (a) A front view of a well showing three vertical layers of i, ii, and iii. Animal distribution in different vertical layers of the gel (b) in the presence of food source, N = 33 animals and (c) in the absence of food source, N = 30 animals. h = H represents the top of the gel where the attractant was placed (See Fig. 1a). Assay conditions were 26% w/w PF-127, H = 0.9 cm and 100 mg/mL E. coli.

Pluronic-based burrowing assay is well suited for diverse C. elegans applications

Our results show that Pluronic gel as a medium for C. elegans burrowing offers several unique advantages including ease of manipulation of animals, easy adjustment of assay conditions to modulate burrowing performance, and the capacity to run assay conditions in parallel in multi-well plates. In this section, we harnessed these capabilities to demonstrate that burrowing can be used in diverse applications. None of these demonstrative applications and the results thereof have been shown by prior burrowing studies1620. Since our intent is to demonstrate the power of the assay platform we designed, we consider our results in each of these applications as laying the foundation for future in-depth investigations.

Mutants with muscle structural defects are deficient in burrowing

Given that the burrowing assay challenges the locomotory ability of C. elegans and that calcium imaging shows muscle contractions, we assessed the suitability and sensitivity of the assay to score mutants with known genetic defects in muscle. For this analysis, we chose mutations in genes encoding proteins localized to dense bodies and M-lines, the two main structural components responsible for assembly and maintenance of the sarcomeres that generate force in C. elegans muscle. Dense body and M-line proteins are also responsible for force transduction from contractile apparatus to hypodermis and cuticle to assist with movement36 (Fig. 6a). Individual gene knockdown of members of these multiprotein complexes has revealed that they are both critical for muscle structure and force transmission, and required for maintaining muscle protein homeostasis and muscle mitochondrial function37.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Burrowing can distinguish mutants with muscle defects. (a) Schematic showing the C. elegans muscle proteins that were tested, with their sites of action being on dense bodies and/or M-line36. The corresponding genetic mutation and human ortholog are shown in the table. Burrowing performance and chemotactic scoring of mutants with defects in (b) both dense body and M-line, 3 replicates and (c) only dense body, 6 replicates. N = 36, 33, 34, 37, 34, 34, 35 and 34 animals for WT, zyx-1, unc-95, tln-1, dyc-1, pfn-3, uig-1 and atn-1 respectively. For burrowing, the assay conditions are 26% w/w PF-127, H = 0.76 cm and 100 mg/mL E. coli. P > 0.05, *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.

We tested the effect of four mutations that specifically affect the dense bodies (pfn-3, atn-1, uig-1, dyc-1) and three that affect both the dense bodies and the M-lines (zyx-1, unc-95, tln-1). Despite these proteins localizing to the same multi-protein complexes, previously reported phenotypes were often distinct (Table S1), perhaps indicating specific functions of individual proteins or differences in the extent of the effect of the specific mutation studied. As chemotaxis is an important element of our burrowing assay, we conducted standard 2D chemotaxis assays on agar plates in parallel to ascertain if the phenotypic score of some mutants is more obvious in the burrowing assay as compared to the standard chemotaxis assay.

For the three mutants with defects in both dense bodies and M-lines, we observed decreased burrowing performance compared with wild-type animals (Fig. 6b, left). Specifically, unc-95 performed the worst, followed by tln-1 and zyx-1. This trend in burrowing mirrored the trend we observed in 2D chemotaxis assays (Fig. 6b, right). This concordance in outcomes from 2D and 3D chemotaxis reveal that these mutants have locomotory defects, which are documented equally using either assay.

When we tested mutants with defects in dense bodies only, we found that these mutants also performed worse than wild-type with their ranking in terms of burrowing outcome decreasing as dyc-1 > uig-1 > pfn-3 > atn-1 (Fig. 6c, left). Interestingly, we found incongruence between 2D and 3D chemotaxis outcomes for some of the mutants in this cohort. In particular, dyc-1 and uig-1 did not show differences in 2D chemotaxis indices compared to wild-type animals, but they performed poorly in burrowing (Fig. 6c, right). pfn-3 showed a higher chemotaxis index compared with wild-type but failed to burrow effectively. Thus, while chemotaxis is an essential component of the burrowing assay, our results show that the mechanical resistance offered during burrowing can reveal differences in muscle mutants that are difficult to discern from standard 2D chemotaxis assays on agar plates.

Modulating assay conditions to phenotype a mitochondrial mutant

Fixed assay conditions might miss the dynamic range of difference for some strains. However, our assay offers the flexibility of varying the gel height as well as concentration to increase the depth of phenotypic analysis. Here, we subjected gei-8(gk693) mutants to different assay conditions to reveal phenotypic differences from wild-type animals. gei-8 encodes a homolog of the vertebrate nuclear receptor corepressor NCoR, known as a negative regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis38. Skeletal muscle-specific knock-out of NCoR1 in mice increased muscle mass and mitochondrial number and activity38. RNAi-mediated knock-down of gei-8 in C. elegans increased muscle mitochondrial load and oxygen consumption rate38. gei-8(gk693) animals have a 1 kb deletion in the gei-8 promoter region and, therefore, the potential for a modified gei-8 expression level.

Our burrowing assay with 26% w/w PF-127 and two distinct gel heights (0.7 and 0.88 cm) revealed no significant difference between gei-8(gk693) and wild-type animals (Fig. 7a). Given that wild-type animals have the minimum burrowing ability at 30% w/w gel concentration (Fig. 2a), we were interested in seeing if gei-8(gk693) would behave similarly to wild type or manifest a different response to increased gel stiffness. Interestingly, increasing the gel concentration to 30% w/w dropped the burrowing percentage of wild type to 50% at the 2 hr timepoint, while it remained around 80% for gei-8 (Fig. 7b), suggesting that gei-8 displays locomotory prowess superior to wild type when challenged. Although consequences of the gei-8(gk693) mutation on muscle strength and/or endurance remain to be clarified, and the biology of NCoR1 is likely to have complex physiology, the important aspect of the burrowing assay we highlight is that tuning the assay conditions can reveal novel and additional information about muscle function and animal behavior.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Tuning the burrowing assay conditions can reveal phenotypic differences. Testing the burrowing performance of wild type and gei-8(gk693) mutant in two different assay conditions of (a) a taller gel height, and (b) a higher gel concentration. N = 31 and 32 for wild-type and gei-8(gk693), respectively. Data was collected from 6 replicates. **P ≤ 0.01.

Sorting and recovery of sub-populations for downstream molecular analysis

One of the interesting features of the burrowing assay is that not all the animals reach the attractant at the same time, i.e. some individuals burrow quickly compared with others in the population. Since nearly all animals remain at the top once they reach the food source, the Pluronic-based burrowing assay provides a simple way of sorting and recovering sub-populations of animals for downstream molecular analysis. Here, we harness this feature of the assay and show that gene expression analysis can be conducted to compare the fast burrowers with the slower ones.

We tested wild-type burrowers that reached the attractant the quickest compared with animals that were slower in burrowing and did not reach the surface within two hours (Fig. 8). We then addressed whether the faster burrowers might have some differential muscle gene expression that facilitates faster movement to the surface. We selected ten body wall muscle genes known to be downregulated in expression as the animal ages39, including troponin (unc-27, tnt-2, mup-2), tropomyosin (lev-11), paramyosin (unc-15), titin (zig-12), calponin (unc-87), muscle myosin regulatory light chains (mlc-1) and myosin heavy chains (unc-54, myo-3) (See Table S2 for additional description of these genes). We used well documented genes cdc-42 and Y45F10D.4 to normalize expression data (Table S3)40. Cycle threshold (Ct) values from qPCR indicated slightly lower values in slow burrowers; since lower Ct values reflect higher the expression level, the expression level of these two housekeeping genes is not reduced in the slow burrowers (Table S4).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Muscle-specific gene expression in fast burrowers compared to slow burrowers. Normalized gene expression scores are shown as ratios for the successful burrowing class (among the top 10–15% that reached the top faster) to the levels for slower animals that remained in the gel by the end of the two-hour time period. zig-12, unc-27, and mup-2 were expressed significantly more for fast burrower animals in comparison to slower ones. Experiments were conducted with Day 1 adults. N = 30 animals with three replicates. Error bars are standard deviation. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.

We found that zig-12, unc-27 and mup-2 were expressed at significantly higher levels in faster burrowers (Fig. 8), while the remaining genes did not show significant expression differences. However, we did note a consistent upward trend in the selected 10 genes. In a follow-up experiment, we found two other muscle genes not upregulated in fast burrowers (See Fig. S6). These findings indicate potential natural expression variation within a genetically identical population and holds potential to indicate the molecular components that might improve burrowing efficiency and locomotory prowess.

Testing disease models of protein aggregation

C. elegans is widely used to model human diseases1 including muscular dystrophies5,41 and neurodegenerative disorders6. Here, we show the utility of our burrowing assay in phenotyping C. elegans strains that model proteotoxicity in neurodegenerative disorders, specifically Huntington and Parkinson’s diseases. Polyglutamine expansions cause Huntington disease42, while α-synuclein is a key protein implicated in Parkinson’s disease43, both of which can result in toxic aggregates disrupting cellular function. We focused on evaluating burrowing performance of C. elegans strains expressing either YFP-tagged polyglutamine (polyQ) or YFP-tagged α-synuclein. The polyQ strains had Q35 and Q40 expressed in body wall muscle using the myosin promoter44, and Q67 and Q86 were expressed in neurons45. For the Parkinson’s disease model, human α-synuclein protein was expressed under the myosin promoter46.

The results from the burrowing experiments, which were conducted with day 1 adults, are shown in Fig. 9. For the transgenic lines that expressed polyQ in muscle, we found that compared to wild-type, Q35-expressing animals were not deficient in their burrowing while Q40-expressing animals were significantly deficient (Fig. 9a). One possibility is that this difference could be due to the presence of visible protein aggregates in Q40-expressing animals but their absence in Q35-expressing animals (Fig. 9b). α-synuclein-expressing animals were even more impaired in their burrowing ability, as only ≈16% of the animals reached the surface.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Burrowing assay phenotypes C. elegans models of neurodegenerative diseases. (a) Burrowing performance of day 1 adults polyQ strains with glutamine expansions in muscles, α-synuclein-expressing strain and wild-type animals. P-values are 0.1268, 0.0302 and 0.0016 for strains expressing Q35, Q40 and α-synuclein respectively. N = 34, 39, 41 and 43 animals for WT, Q35, Q40 and α-synuclein strains, respectively. (b) Images show visible protein aggregates in the Q40-expressing strain and not in the Q35-expressing strain. (c) Day 1 adult Q67-expressing and Q86-experssing animals with protein aggregation in neurons are deficient in burrowing. P-values for Q67: <0.0001, Q86: 0.0437. Data was collected from 6 replicates. N = 37, 37 and 38 animals for WT, Q67 and Q86 strains respectively. Assay conditions are 26% w/w, H = 0.7 cm and 100 mg/mL E. coli.

For the transgenic lines that expressed polyQ in neurons, Q67- and Q86-expressing animals were both distinctly impaired in their burrowing abilities compared with wild type (Fig. 9c). However, the difference between wild type and Q86 was modest, and the primary differentiating factor between wild type and Q67 was the delayed rate at which Q67-expressing animals reached the surface. The burrowing impairment in transgenic C. elegans expressing proteotoxic aggregates in neurons, while detectable, therefore does not appear to be as strong as those expressed in body wall muscle, at least at the beginning of adulthood.

Our results indicate that the Pluronic-gel based burrowing assays can be used to assess declines in neuromuscular health in proteotoxic disease models of C. elegans in addition to, or in place of, standard assays including thrashing and crawling47. For many of these strains expressing proteotoxic aggregates, motility defects have previously been reported. Q35- and Q40-expressing animals have impaired motility, with crawling defects first becoming apparent on approximately day 2 and day 0 of adulthood, respectively44. Thrashing defects have been reported for both Q67 and Q86 on the first day of adulthood45. However, day 5 animals expressing α-synuclein were not significantly worse in thrashing than their wild-type counterparts48. Thus, the burrowing assay has the capacity to detect neuromuscular deficits in neurodegenerative disease models and in some cases prior to major locomotory impairment, underscoring the importance of the burrowing assay for deciphering factors that influence the earliest events in degenerative processes.

Discussion

Pluronic as a novel medium for C. elegans burrowing

Even though burrowing of nematodes in soil-like environments has been previously studied4951, burrowing has only recently been used for evaluation of neuromuscular health in C. elegans16,18,19,22,52. These recent investigations employed agar as a medium for burrowing. Here, we have shown that the biocompatible and optically transparent Pluronic gel offers an alternative for burrowing studies with several advantages including ease of manipulation of animals, flexibility in changing assay conditions to modulate burrowing performance, parallel evaluation of assay conditions or different strains in multi-well plates, and easy recovery of animals for follow-up analysis.

Our results show that the mechanical resistance offered by the Pluronic gel for burrowing is significant. Under standard assay conditions of 26% w/w, we observed that animals burrow with a mean velocity of 1.14 mm/min and undulatory frequency of 0.07 Hz. In contrast, at 3% w/v agar, animal velocity was found to be 2 mm/min19 and at 9% w/v agar the undulatory frequency was reported to be 0.2 Hz16. Additionally, 3D behavioral studies in 3% w/v gelatin report a velocity of 5 mm/min17. Even though systematic studies comparing locomotory prowess in these different media have not been conducted, available findings indicate that the Pluronic medium is likely to be a more demanding burrowing environment for C. elegans than agar or gelatin.

The simplicity of our burrowing assay workflow lends itself to considerable throughput and versatility. Currently, using 12-well plates we perform 4 strains ×3 replicates in about 4 hours, which includes loading of 30 animals and the gel layer in each well and scoring every 15 minutes for a total duration of 2 hours. Other assay formats could also be designed, where for example, the fraction of animals on the gel surface is recorded only at the final time point. Such end-point assays could be performed with significantly higher throughput and in a miniaturized format involving 96-well plates.

Burrowing is a sensitive phenotyping tool to evaluate neuromuscular function in C. elegans

Very few studies have exploited burrowing ability as a way to evaluate neuromuscular health in C. elegans. Since the original method was conceived18, it has been applied to score muscular dystrophy mutants16 and to probe calcium dysregulation and longevity outcomes due to physical exertion in the burrowing environment in these mutants19. Additionally, a burrowing assay has been used to assess mutants with defects in mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins22. Here, we have developed an improved burrowing method based on a thermoreversible Pluronic gel and expanded its application to diverse areas with novel findings.

Our results show that mutants can be uniquely distinguished based on burrowing capacity, which is sometimes difficult to discern from 2D crawling locomotion and thrashing assays. As shown in Table S1, the muscle mutants studied in Sec. II.D-i could not be differentiated based on just one phenotypic assay, suggesting that subtle genetic defects might be difficult to detect by existing locomotory assays. The fact that burrowing distinguishes all the muscle mutants studied indicates its capacity to detect subtle defects in neuromuscular function, reflecting a good dynamic range.

In general, successful burrowing of C. elegans requires that both neuromuscular function and chemotaxis responses must be intact. How do we dissect the contributions of neuromuscular strength and chemotactic prowess from burrowing experiments? Using 2D chemotaxis in conjunction with burrowing can help address these contributions to a certain extent as evident from the muscle mutants in Fig. 6c, which do not show obvious 2D chemotaxis deficits but exhibit significant burrowing deficiency. In cases where mutants show impairment in both 2D chemotaxis and burrowing, additional assays can be utilized. For example, microfluidic systems can be used to score for muscle strength in C. elegans9 based on deflectable micropillars or chemotactic ability can be recorded from head-swaying of partially-immobilized animals, minimizing the contribution of crawling locomotion53.

Our burrowing platform offers the potential for several new lines of investigation. For example, the muscle mutants atn-1 and unc-95 hardly burrow toward the attractant, indicating that mutagenizing these strains and conducting our assays might allow us to isolate suppressor mutants that reveal compensatory mechanisms that may promote burrowing. Likewise, transcriptomic analysis on the fast burrowers is likely to uncover new genes that improve burrowing ability and therefore neuromuscular health in C. elegans. Our results on Huntington and Parkinson’s disease models (Fig. 9) certainly opens the door for screening of compounds that can lead to prioritization of therapeutic candidates for testing in mammalian systems.

Conclusions

We have shown that configuring the C. elegans burrowing assay in Pluronic gel medium offers the convenience of a simple workflow with high throughput. We systematically studied the influence of assay conditions on burrowing ability and modulated the physical challenge experienced by animals based on the needs of a particular application. The demonstrative applications we have chosen highlight the richness of the burrowing assay in diverse areas where the neuromuscular system is implicated. We anticipate that the Pluronic burrowing assay can be easily adopted in other laboratories, enabling comprehensive investigations of the molecular, cellular and tissue-level mechanisms required for the maintenance of neuromuscular health in C. elegans that might be translatable to human neuromuscular diseases.

Materials and Methods

Worm culture

Caenorhabditis elegans wild type N2 was cultured at 20 °C on standard nematode growth medium (NGM) on 60 cm petri plates and never allowed to starve. The NGM plates were allowed to dry 24 hours prior to seeding with 450–550 μL of Escherichia coli OP50 bacteria overnight. Age synchronization was done by transferring 20–25 gravid animals to seeded plates and letting them lay eggs for 3–4 hours. After the desired number of eggs were laid, the gravid adults were removed, and the eggs were allowed to hatch and develop in a 20 °C incubator. The animals used for all experiments were day 1 adults. The day that the age synchronized animals started to lay eggs is counted as day 0 of adulthood.

The following mutants were obtained from Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC): dyc-1(cx32), pfn-3(tm1362), uig-1(ok884), atn-1(ok84), zyx-1(gk190), unc-95(ok893), tln-1(e259), TJ356(DAF-16::GFP). For calcium imaging the following strain was used: HBR4: goeIs3 HBR4: goeIs3[Pmyo-3::GCaMP3.35::unc-54-3′utr, unc-119] from CGC which expresses the calcium indicator GCaMP3 in body wall muscles.

Strains used as protein aggregation disease models were obtained from CGC and have the following genotypes: pkIs2386[Punc-54::alphasynuclein::YFP + unc-119(+)], rmIs132[Punc-54 Q35::YFP], rmIs133[Punc-54 Q40::YFP], N2; rmEx135(F25B3.3p::Q86::YFP), and N2; rmEx164(F25B3.3p::Q67::YFP).

Quantification of calcium activity dynamics

The HBR4 strain was imaged while burrowing in 26% w/w Pluronic using a Nikon Ti-E microscope at 10x with an exposure of 150 ms and frame rate of 3 fps. The worm body was segmented into 11 equal areas in each frame. The maximum pixel intensity in each segment on both dorsal and ventral sides were measured using ImageJ software54. Muscle brightness was calculated as the ratio of this maximum intensity in dorsal/ventral body segments and plotted as a function of time, i.e. every second, similar to that shown in Hughes et al. for animals burrowing in agar16.

Pluronic-based burrowing assays

To develop and optimize the burrowing assay, various Pluronic concentrations and gel heights were tested. Pluronic F127 (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in deionized water to reach the desired concentration, reported as solute weight per solution weight (% w/w). The suspension was kept at 4 °C until all the Pluronic pellets dissolved. The solutions were stored at 4 °C prior to the experiment to prevent gelation. The Pluronic concentration in all assays was the optimized concentration of 26% w/w, except for when other concentrations were tested.

The Pluronic solutions were kept at 14 °C in a Waverly digital thermal bath for at least 30 minutes before conducting the experiment. 20–30 μL of solution was added to the bottom of a Corning™ Falcon™ Polystyrene 12-well plate (Fig. 1a). A minimum number of 30 animals (day 1 adults) were hand-picked from NGM plates and released into the drop. After around 10 minutes, a layer of Pluronic was cast on top of the initial droplet to the desired thickness, ranging from 0.44 cm to 1.1 cm depending on the experiment. The top layer needed around 5 minutes to gel at a room temperature of 20 °C. Gelation was confirmed by no fluid movement and inserting the tip of the worm pick somewhere close to the edge of the well. If no healing of the indentation was observed after piercing, then the gel had been formed, and 20 μL of the chemoattractant was added directly to the top (t = 0 min). The animals that had burrowed to the surface were scored by monitoring the top layer under the microscope and counting the ones that had reached the top every 15 minutes for a total duration of 2 hours. The replicates per treatment, each in a different well, were conducted concurrently. The percentage of animals on the top surface was defined as the number of animals on the top surface divided by the total sample size in that well.

All the burrowing assays were conducted by hand picking animals, except Fig. 9a on neurodegenerative disease models, as those animals were rinsed off the plates with DI water and collected in Falcon tubes. The rinsing process is the same as preparing animals for chemotaxis assays (See Methods on Chemotaxis assays). After rinsing off the animals from bacteria, 10 µL of worm solution was placed on the bottom of well plate. Then, 500 µL of PF-127 was added to make a base gel layer. Finally, the Pluronic layer was cast on top to the desired thickness of 0.7 cm, followed by 20 µL of E. coli attractant.

Behavioral analysis during burrowing

The animals were assessed for burrowing behavioral analysis and characterization by being sandwiched in 1 mL Pluronic gel between a 75 mm × 25 mm Fisherbrand™ plain microscope glass slide and a coverslip with a gel thickness of approximately 1 mm. This method was utilized to reduce the chance of a vertically oriented planar burrowing rather than parallel to the microscope focal plane for the sake of better imaging. After sandwiching, the animals were allowed 30 minutes to acclimate before the imaging started. For velocity and undulatory frequency, 2-minute video segments in which the animals were exclusively moving forward were selected. Eight 15-second unique time segments were the replicates used to find the velocity. The worm body centroid was tracked and the distance the centroid traveled every 15 seconds was measured using ImageJ software54. The undulatory frequency (Hz) was defined as the number of full-wavelength sinusoidal movements the worm could make within one second. For this purpose, the required time for a full sinusoidal movement was measured for eight distinct sinusoidal movements. Then, the inverse was taken to result in the frequency (Hz).

To characterize the burrowing behavior, 5-minute uninterrupted videos with the frame rate of 3 fps were captured using a Nikon Ti-E microscope at 4x. Afterwards, the videos were analyzed by assessing the time the animals spent moving forward, backward, or pausing.

To investigate animal distribution across gel heights, the total gel height was divided into three equal layers (Fig. 5a), and the number of animals in each segment at each time point was counted by scanning the z-axis through the gel height from bottom to the top surface using a Nikon Ti-E microscope with a 4x objective lens.

2D Chemotaxis assays

To test the effectiveness of animal chemosensation, standard 2D chemotaxis assays were conducted. E. coli was concentrated in liquid NGM (as above without agar). Isoamyl alcohol and diacetyl were diluted in ethanol to 1%. For agar chemotaxis experiments, the chemoattractant solutions were freshly mixed with an equal volume of 0.5 M sodium azide as an anesthetic, facilitating scoring.

Volatile compound chemotaxis assays on agar plates were conducted according to Margie et al.55 with a few modifications. Briefly, chemotaxis agar (2% agar (Fisher Scientific), 5 mM potassium phosphate (Fisher Scientific), 1 mM calcium chloride (Avantor), 1 mM magnesium sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich)) was prepared a day prior to the experiment and poured into 6 cm petri plates. The animals were collected in Falcon tubes by washing them from culture plates with deionized water and allowing them to pellet by gravity. After 5 minutes, the supernatant was carefully removed, water was added, and the tube was inverted a few times to wash the worms. This rinsing process was repeated 4 times, so the supernatant on top looked clear and bacteria-free. Finally, the animal pellet was resuspended in water to obtain around 60 animals per 5 μL. 5 μL of worm solution was pipetted onto the center of the chemotaxis plate. Immediately, 2 μL of test solution (chemoattractant) and 2 μL of control solution (diluent) were added to their designated quadrants. After an hour, chemotaxis indices were calculated as the difference in the number of worms in the test and control quadrants (excluding the animals that did not migrate farther than 1 cm), normalized with the total number of worms.

Chemotaxis assays with E. coli in liquid NGM required time for gradient formation56 and was conducted according to Wen et al. with minor modifications57. The chemotaxis agar was made as described in the volatile compounds assay section above. 10 mL of chemotaxis agar was poured into 10 cm petri plates a day prior to the experiment. The plates were marked underside by dividing them into two semicircles. On one side, the test solution (5 μL of E. coli in liquid NGM) was spotted 3 cm from the midline. The control solution (5 μL of DI water) was placed on the exact opposite side. After the solutions were placed, the plates were left for 3.5 hours to allow the chemical gradient to establish before testing the animals. The animals were washed from their culture plates with chemotaxis buffer (5 mM potassium phosphate, 1 mM calcium chloride, 1 mM magnesium sulfate) until they were free of bacteria. The total time that the worms spent swimming in liquid was kept under 30 minutes to minimize fatigue58. Then, 5 μL of the solution containing animals was added onto the center. Whenever the liquid absorbed, the animals were gently dispersed using a worm pick, so they were not trapped within the liquid droplet. The assay was completed in 1.5 hours, and the chemotaxis index was calculated as mentioned before.

RNA extraction and quantitative PCR

RNA extraction and quantitative PCR were carried out as previously described58. Briefly, we collected N2 C. elegans after burrowing (~30 animals per sample) into TRIzol Reagent (Ambion) and immediately froze animals in liquid nitrogen. The quick burrowers were among the top 10–15% in burrowing performance, while the slow burrowers were recovered from the Pluronic at the conclusion of the two-hour time period. After freeze-thaw cycles with liquid nitrogen/37 °C heat block, we extracted total RNA following the manufacturer’s instructions (Ambion) and synthesized cDNA using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen).

We performed quantitative PCR using diluted cDNA, PerfeCTa SYBR Green FastMix (Quantabio) and 0.5 µM of gene-specific primers (Table S3) in a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems), calculating relative expression using the ΔΔCt method59 with cdc-42 and Y45F10D.4 as reference genes40.

Statistical analysis

To compare mutants and disease models burrowing performance, two-way ANOVA was used in GraphPad Prism software. The statistical analysis on chemotaxis indices was done using two-sample student’s t-test in MATLAB. For qPCR, paired-sample t-test was done using MATLAB. Burrowing assay error bars represent standard error of the mean. All the assays were done in three replicates unless otherwise noted. N represents average of the number of animals used in the replicates.

Supplementary information

Video (7.5MB, mp4)
Video (252.6KB, mp4)

Acknowledgements

Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). We would like to thank Anam Mahmood for assistance with experiments and Guy M. Benian for useful discussions. This work is partially supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (RO1 AG051995-04 to M.D. & S.V.), Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP160806 to S.V.), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AL16G to S.V. & J.B.) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/N015894/1 to N.J.S.). J.E.H. acknowledges funding support from the Fulbright U.S. Student Program and the Germanistic Society of America. R.L. has been funded by postdoctoral fellowships from Life Sciences Research Foundation (sponsored by Simons Foundation) (award # Laranjeiro-2015) and American Heart Association (award # 18POST33960502). A.A. was supported by the Max Planck Society.

Author contributions

L.L., C.M.R.L. and S.A.V. conceived the Pluronic gel-based burrowing assay. L.L., J.E.H. and R.L. performed the experiments. All authors analyzed and interpreted the data. L.L., J.E.H. and S.A.V. wrote the paper. All authors read and commented on the manuscript. S.A.V. supervised the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-51608-9.

References

  • 1.Culetto E, Sattelle DB. A role for Caenorhabditis elegans in understanding the function and interactions of human disease genes. Human Molecular Genetics. 2000;9:869–877. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.6.869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986;314:1–340. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Developmental biology. 1977;56:110–156. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(77)90158-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sleigh J, Sattelle D. C. elegans models of neuromuscular diseases expedite translational research. Translational Neuroscience. 2010;1:214–227. doi: 10.2478/v10134-010-0032-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chamberlain JS, Benian GM. Muscular dystrophy: the worm turns to genetic disease. Current Biology. 2000;10:R795–R797. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00768-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dimitriadi M, Hart AC. Neurodegenerative disorders: insights from the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Neurobiology of disease. 2010;40:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anne, C. Hart, E. Behavior. WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, 10.1895/wormbook.1.87.1 (July 3, 2006).
  • 8.Gaffney, C. J., Bass, J. J., Barratt, T. F. & Szewczyk, N. J. Methods to assess subcellular compartments of muscle in C. elegans. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), e52043 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Rahman M, et al. NemaFlex: a microfluidics-based technology for standardized measurement of muscular strength of C. elegans. Lab on a Chip. 2018;18:2187–2201. doi: 10.1039/C8LC00103K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Johari S, Nock V, Alkaisi MM, Wang W. On-chip analysis of C. elegans muscular forces and locomotion patterns in microstructured environments. Lab on a Chip. 2013;13:1699–1707. doi: 10.1039/c3lc41403e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Padmanabhan V, et al. Locomotion of C. elegans: a piecewise-harmonic curvature representation of nematode behavior. PloS one. 2012;7:e40121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stephens GJ, Johnson-Kerner B, Bialek W, Ryu WS. Dimensionality and dynamics in the behavior of C. elegans. PLoS computational biology. 2008;4:e1000028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Restif C, et al. CeleST: computer vision software for quantitative analysis of C. elegans swim behavior reveals novel features of locomotion. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhen M, Samuel AD. C. elegans locomotion: small circuits, complex functions. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2015;33:117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frézal L, Félix M-A. The natural history of model organisms: C. elegans outside the Petri dish. Elife. 2015;4:e05849. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Beron C, et al. The burrowing behavior of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: a new assay for the study of neuromuscular disorders. Genes, Brain and Behavior. 2015;14:357–368. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kwon N, Hwang AB, You Y-J, Lee S-JV, Je JH. Dissection of C. elegans behavioral genetics in 3-D environments. Scientific reports. 2015;5:9564. doi: 10.1038/srep09564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bainbridge C, Schuler A, Vidal-Gadea A. Method for the assessment of neuromuscular integrity and burrowing choice in vermiform animals. Journal of neuroscience methods. 2016;264:40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hughes, K. et al. Physical exertion exacerbates decline in the musculature of an animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201811379 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Lee TY, Yoon K-h, Lee JI. NGT-3D: a simple nematode cultivation system to study Caenorhabditis elegans biology in 3D. Biology open. 2016;5:529–534. doi: 10.1242/bio.015743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bilbao, A., Patel, A. K., Rahman, M., Vanapalli, S. A. & Blawzdziewicz, J. Roll maneuvers are essential for active reorientation of Caenorhabditis elegans in 3D media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201706754 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Byrne, J. J. et al. Disruption of mitochondrial dynamics affects behaviour and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1–19 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Dong L, et al. Reversible and long-term immobilization in a hydrogel-microbead matrix for high-resolution imaging of Caenorhabditis elegans and other small organisms. PloS one. 2018;13:e0193989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Aubry G, Zhan M, Lu H. Hydrogel-droplet microfluidic platform for high-resolution imaging and sorting of early larval Caenorhabditis elegans. Lab on a Chip. 2015;15:1424–1431. doi: 10.1039/C4LC01384K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hwang H, Krajniak J, Matsunaga Y, Benian GM, Lu H. On-demand optical immobilization of Caenorhabditis elegans for high-resolution imaging and microinjection. Lab on a Chip. 2014;14:3498–3501. doi: 10.1039/C4LC00697F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chuang H-S, Chuang W-Y. Rapid, reversible and addressable immobilization of Caenorhabditis elegans in Pluronic F-127 using an optoelectric device. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2017;253:376–383. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.06.130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Krajniak J, Hao Y, Mak HY, Lu H. CLIP–continuous live imaging platform for direct observation of C. elegans physiological processes. Lab on a Chip. 2013;13:2963–2971. doi: 10.1039/c3lc50300c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schwarz, J., Spies, J. -P. & Bringmann, H. In Worm. 12–14 (Taylor & Francis). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Momma, K., Homma, T., Isaka, R., Sudevan, S. & Higashitani, A. Heat-Induced Calcium Leakage Causes Mitochondrial Damage in Caenorhabditis elegans Body-Wall Muscles. Genetics, genetics. 117.202747 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Lefebvre, C. et al. The ESCRT-II proteins are involved in shaping the sarcoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci, jcs., 178467 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 31.Geng H, Song H, Qi J, Cui D. Sustained release of VEGF from PLGA nanoparticles embedded thermo-sensitive hydrogel in full-thickness porcine bladder acellular matrix. Nanoscale research letters. 2011;6:312. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-6-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hart, A. C. & Chao, M. Y. From odors to behaviors in Caenorhabditis elegans. The neurobiology of olfaction (2010). [PubMed]
  • 33.Bargmann CI, Hartwieg E, Horvitz HR. Odorant-selective genes and neurons mediate olfaction in C. elegans. Cell. 1993;74:515–527. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80053-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bargmann, C. I. Chemosensation in C. elegans (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Fang-Yen C, et al. Biomechanical analysis of gait adaptation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:20323–20328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003016107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gieseler, K., Qadota, H. & Benian, G. Development, structure, and maintenance of C. elegans body wall muscle. WormBook: the online review of C. elegans biology, 1 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Etheridge T, et al. The integrin-adhesome is required to maintain muscle structure, mitochondrial ATP production, and movement forces in Caenorhabditis elegans. The FASEB Journal. 2015;29:1235–1246. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-259119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yamamoto H, et al. NCoR1 is a conserved physiological modulator of muscle mass and oxidative function. Cell. 2011;147:827–839. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mergoud dit Lamarche, A. et al. UNC-120/SRF independently controls muscle aging and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging cell (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Hoogewijs D, Houthoofd K, Matthijssens F, Vandesompele J, Vanfleteren JR. Selection and validation of a set of reliable reference genes for quantitative sod gene expression analysis in C. elegans. BMC molecular biology. 2008;9:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2199-9-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hewitt Jennifer E., Pollard Amelia K., Lesanpezeshki Leila, Deane Colleen S., Gaffney Christopher J., Etheridge Timothy, Szewczyk Nathaniel J., Vanapalli Siva A. Muscle strength deficiency and mitochondrial dysfunction in a muscular dystrophy model of Caenorhabditis elegans and its functional response to drugs. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 2018;11(12):dmm036137. doi: 10.1242/dmm.036137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zoghbi HY, Orr HT. Glutamine repeats and neurodegeneration. Annual review of neuroscience. 2000;23:217–247. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Baba M, et al. Aggregation of alpha-synuclein in Lewy bodies of sporadic Parkinson’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. The American journal of pathology. 1998;152:879. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Morley JF, Brignull HR, Weyers JJ, Morimoto RI. The threshold for polyglutamine-expansion protein aggregation and cellular toxicity is dynamic and influenced by aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99:10417–10422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.152161099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Brignull HR, Moore FE, Tang SJ, Morimoto RI. Polyglutamine proteins at the pathogenic threshold display neuron-specific aggregation in a pan-neuronal Caenorhabditis elegans model. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006;26:7597–7606. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0990-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Van Ham TJ, et al. C. elegans model identifies genetic modifiers of α-synuclein inclusion formation during aging. PLoS genetics. 2008;4:e1000027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Koopman, M., Seinstra, R. I. & Nollen, E. A. A. In Alpha-Synuclein 93–112 (Springer, 2019).
  • 48.Pandey T, et al. Anti-ageing and anti-Parkinsonian effects of natural flavonol, tambulin from Zanthoxyllum aramatum promotes longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental gerontology. 2019;120:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Young I, Griffiths B, Robertson W, McNicol J. Nematode (Caenorhabditis elegans) movement in sand as affected by particle size, moisture and the presence of bacteria (Escherichia coli) European Journal of Soil Science. 1998;49:237–242. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1998.00151.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hunt HW, Wall DH, Decrappeo NM, Brenner JS. A model for nematode locomotion in soil. Nematology. 2001;3:705–716. doi: 10.1163/156854101753536082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Feltham D, Chaplain M, Young I, Crawford J. A mathematical analysis of a minimal model of nematode migration in soil. Journal of Biological Systems. 2002;10:15–32. doi: 10.1142/S0218339002000251. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vidal-Gadea, A. et al. Magnetosensitive neurons mediate geomagnetic orientation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Elife4 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.McCormick KE, Gaertner BE, Sottile M, Phillips PC, Lockery SR. Microfluidic devices for analysis of spatial orientation behaviors in semi-restrained Caenorhabditis elegans. PloS one. 2011;6:e25710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Rasband, W. S. Imagej, us national institutes of health, bethesda, maryland, usa, http://imagej, nih. gov/ij/ (2011).
  • 55.Margie, O., Palmer, C. & Chin-Sang, I. C. elegans chemotaxis assay. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Ward S. Chemotaxis by the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: identification of attractants and analysis of the response by use of mutants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1973;70:817–821. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wen JY, et al. Mutations that prevent associative learning in C. elegans. Behavioral neuroscience. 1997;111:354. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.111.2.354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Laranjeiro R, Harinath G, Burke D, Braeckman BP, Driscoll M. Single swim sessions in C. elegans induce key features of mammalian exercise. BMC biology. 2017;15:30. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0368-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video (7.5MB, mp4)
Video (252.6KB, mp4)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES