Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry logoLink to International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
. 2019 May-Jun;12(3):237–242. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1630

Dermatoglyphics as a Noninvasive Tool for Predicting Dental Caries in Cerebral Palsy and Healthy Children: An In Vivo Study

Rani Somani 1,, Monika P Gupta 2, Shipra Jaidka 3, Deepti J Singh 4, Vishal Puri 5, Dilip Kumar 6
PMCID: PMC6811938  PMID: 31708622

ABSTRACT

Aim

To find the association of dermatoglyphics and dental caries in normal and cerebral palsy (CP) children.

Materials and methods

A total of 150 children of age group 6–12 years were selected and divided into three equal groups. Group I constituted of 50 CP caries-active children, group II constituted of 50 healthy caries active children, and group III consisted of 50 healthy caries-free children. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were used for diagnosis and recording of decayed, missing, filled teeth (DMFT)/deft scores. Fingerprints of both hands were taken using a stamp pad and analyzed using the Cummin and Midlo method.

Results

The results were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD). The data for the entire study were calculated using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) statistical software 19.0 version. The mean DMFT/deft score was the highest for the CP caries-active group compared to the healthy caries-active and healthy caries-free children. Dermatoglyphic pattern distribution in the CP caries-active group showed more whorls and that in the healthy caries-free group showed more arches. Intergroup comparisons for DMFT/deft and dermatoglyphic patterns were significant except between CP caries-active children and healthy caries-active children.

Conclusion

Association of dermatoglyphics and dental caries was observed among CP caries-active children, healthy caries-active children, and healthy caries-free children. This association can be helpful in identifying the possible genetic predisposition and early prediction of dental caries in CP children, so as to initiate oral health measures at an early stage.

Clinical significance

Maintaining oral hygiene has always been a challenge in children because of many difficulties like behavior management and lack of dexterity, and it becomes all the more difficult in the case of children with special needs. Dermatoglyphics can be proven to be a very useful, noninvasive, and economical tool for the preliminary diagnosis of diseases of suspected genetic origin like dental caries and CP.

How to cite this article

Somani R, Gupta MP, et al. Dermatoglyphics as a Noninvasive Tool for Predicting Dental Caries in Cerebral Palsy and Healthy Children: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019;12(3):237–242.

Keywords: Cerebral palsy, Dental caries, Dermatoglyphics, Fingerprint patterns

INTRODUCTION

Smile is the most effective way of interacting for many children with developmental disabilities, but they often have unmet complex oral health care needs as well as significant physical and cognitive limitations which may affect their quality of life and ability to eat, sleep, and function. As per Census 2011, in India, out of the 121 Cr populations, about 2.68 Cr persons, which are 2.21% of the total population, are suffering from some kind of disability. Children with disabilities may have more marked oral problems either because of their actual disability or for other medical, economic, and social reasons or even because of their parents’ having difficulty in carrying out proper regular oral hygiene measures. Some of the common forms of disability are mental retardation, cerebral palsy (CP), autism, attention deficient hyperactive syndrome, Down syndrome, etc. One of the most common forms of neuromuscular disabilities affecting children is CP, the worldwide incidence being 2 to 2.5 per 1,000 live births, and in India, the incidence being 3.3 in 1,000 live births.1

CP describes a group of permanent disorders involving movement and posture development that cause activity limitations. Perinatal asphyxia is found to be the cause of the disease in only 6–8% of the cases, whereas prenatal risk factors account for approximately 75% of CP cases.2 Genetic factors play a role in the genesis of CP, and genetically determined causes are identified in 40% of CP patients. Children suffering from CP have motor dysfunctions which are often accompanied by disturbances of sensation, perception, cognition, communication, and behavior. These are attributed to nonprogressive disturbances occurring in the developing fetal or infant brain. These neuromuscular problems inherent in CP can affect the oral health significantly, thereby acting as a barrier to oral care access, thus increasing caries susceptibility.

Dental caries is known to be a complex, chronic, multifactorial most prevalent oral disease having a genetic basis. The genetic basis of dental caries is established by the twin studies of global evidence of dental caries heritability and studies of inherited variations in dental enamel.3

The epithelium of the finger buds, the enamel, which is the most susceptible dental tissue to caries, as well as the early fetal brain development have an ectodermal origin and develop at the same time of intrauterine life, in the 6th to 7th week of gestation and completed by 20th to 24th week of gestation.4 This indicates that the genetic message present in the genetic makeup of a person normal or with disability is transmitted through this period and is reflected by dermatoglyphics.5 Thus, the resulting ridge configurations are genetically determined and also influenced and modified by environmental factors.

Dermatoglyphics is the study of fingerprints and is considered to be a window of congenital abnormalities. Diagnosing dental caries in CP children is a very challenging task for the dentist and providing treatment is all the more difficult. Thus, dermatoglyphics being a genetic marker of dental caries can be used as an indicator for dental caries much before its initiation, giving an opportunity to the dentist to take preventive measures to help combat the development of the disease in an early stage. So, this study was undertaken to determine an association of dermatoglyphics with dental caries in normal and CP children.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the dermatoglyphics and dental caries in CP caries-active children, healthy caries-active children, and healthy caries-free children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present in vivo study was carried out in Divya Jyoti (DJ) College of Dental Sciences, Modinagar, in collaboration with Asha School, Military Hospital, Meerut Cantonment, Disha School, Meerut, and KV Punjab Lines, Meerut Cantonment. An ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional ethical committee prior to the study (DJD/2BC/2017/A-2C). Written consent was taken from the principals of the concerned schools on behalf of children after explaining them the procedure of the study.

A total of 150 students of the age group 6–12 years were taken. These were divided into three groups. Fifty children were taken from the institutional schools (Asha School and Disha School, Meerut), which constituted group I with the inclusion criteria being the presence of caries and no other systemic condition other than CP. Hundred children were taken from KV Punjab Lines, Meerut Cantonment, which constituted group II (N = 50) and group III (N = 50), the inclusion criterion for the group II children was the presence of caries without any systemic condition and those for group III was complete absence of caries and absence of any systemic condition.

Recording of the DMFT/deft Index

Case history was recorded using “Dentition status and treatment needs,” (WHO basic oral health assessment form 1997).6 Dental caries was recorded using the DMFT and deft index for permanent and primary teeth using type 3 examination. Intraoral examination of the children with CP was carried out in the presence of their school teacher or the care giver, so as to gain cooperation from the children. The overall values of DMFT and deft were evaluated separately (Figs 1 and 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Recording of DMFT/deft in CP children

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Recording of DMFT/deft in normal children

Dermatoglyphic Pattern Recording and its Interpretation

Fingerprint Recording

Fingerprints were recorded using the ink method described by Cummin and Midlo. Before starting the procedure, the hands of the children were washed with antiseptic solution using cotton and were allowed to dry. The fingers were guided and pressed lightly on the ink pad and then guided by the examiner and pressed firmly on the A4 sheets which were kept on a firm surface. The children were made to do this repeatedly on 2 to 3 A4 sheets placed simultaneously till clear prints were obtained.

Method of Reading Fingerprints

The fingerprints were observed in a sequential manner and were analyzed from the fourth digit of the left hand moving in a clockwise direction till the thumb and then were analyzed from the thumb of the right hand moving in a clockwise direction till the fourth finger. These dermatoglyphic patterns were analyzed with the help of a magnifying glass (10×) (Figs 3 and 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Recording of dermatoglyphic patterns in CP children

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Recording of dermatoglyphic patterns in normal children

Dermatoglyphic Pattern Analysis

The ridge patterns on the distal phalanges of the fingertips observed were divided into three groups: arches, loops, and whorls.7

(i) Arches

These are the simplest patterns found on fingertips. These are formed by succession of more or less parallel ridges, which traverse the pattern area and form a curve that is concave proximally. Sometimes, the curve is gentle; at other times, it swings more sharply, so that it may also be designated as a low or high arch, respectively.

(ii) Loops

These are the most common patterns on fingertips. A series of ridges enter the pattern area on one side of the digit, recurve abruptly, and leave the pattern area on the same side. Loops may vary considerably in shape and size. They may be large or small, tailor short, and vertically or horizontally oriented.

(iii) Whorls

These are any ridge configurations with two or more tri-radii. One tri-radius is on the radial side and the other on the ulnar side of the pattern. Tri-radii are formed by the confluence of three ridge systems that form angles of approximately 120° with one another.

RESULTS

The obtained data were collected and statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test using SPSS statistical software 19.0 versions. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered for statistical significance.

A steady decrease in the values of DMFT/deft was seen from group I (CP caries-active group) to group III (healthy caries-free group) with mean values of 0.88/2.70, 0.58/1.96, and 0.00/0.00 (Table 1 and Fig. 5). Intergroup comparison using post hoc analysis by Tukey's HSD test showed that all the intergroup comparisons were found to be statistically nonsignificant except when group III (healthy caries-free group) was compared with group I (CP caries-active group) and group II (healthy caries-active group) with a p value ≤0.05 (Table 2).

Table 1.

Mean values of DMFT/deft of various groups

Various groups N Mean SD SEM
DMFT Deft DMFT Deft DMFT Deft
Group I 50 0.88 2.70 1.319 1.992 0.18657 0.281
Group II 50 0.58 1.96 0.810 1.428 0.11461 0.201
Group III 50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Group I: CP caries-active children; group II: healthy caries-active children; group III: healthy caries-free children; SD: standard deviation; SEM: standard error mean

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Mean values of DMFT/deft

Table 2.

Post-Tukey's analysis of intergroup comparison of DMFT and deft

Intergroup comparison Mean difference SE p-value
DMFT Deft DMFT Deft DMFT Deft
Group I vs group II 0.30000 −0.74000 0.17878 0.28304 0.095 0.100
Group I vs group III 0.88000 2.70000 0.17878 0.28304 0.001a 0.001a
Group II vs group III 0.58000 1.96000 0.17878 0.28304 0.001a 0.001a

aStatistically significant with p-value ≤0.05; SE: standard error

The mean value of arches was found to be the highest in group III (healthy caries-free group), which was 4.152, and it was found to be the lowest for group II (healthy caries-active group) which was 2.270. Group I (CP caries-active group) showed a mean value of arches (3.180) which was more than that of group II (healthy caries-active group), but less than that of group I (CP caries-active group) (Table 3, Fig. 6).

Table 3.

Mean values of dermatoglyphic patterns of various groups

Various groups N Mean SD SE
Arches Whorls Loops Arches Whorls Loops Arches Whorls Loops
Group I 50 3.180 4.740 2.140 2.228 2.663 1.948 0.315 0.376 0.275
Group II 50 2.720 4.420 2.860 1.852 2.634 2.213 0.261 0.372 0.313
Group III 50 4.152 3.200 3.002 2.428 1.993 2.002 0.343 0.182 0.325

Group I: CP caries-active children; group II: healthy caries-active children; group III: healthy caries-free children; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Mean values of dermatoglyphic patterns

The mean value of whorls showed a decrease in values from group I (CP caries-active group), which was 4.740, to group II (healthy caries-active children), which was 4.420, and then group III (healthy caries-free children), which was 3.200 (Table 3 and Fig. 6). All the intergroup comparisons for arches and whorls were found to be statistically significant except when group I (CP caries-active children) was compared with group II (healthy caries-active children) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Post-Tukey's analysis of intergroup comparison of various dermatoglyphic patterns of various groups

Dependent variable Intergroup comparison Mean difference SE p-value
ARCHES Group I vs group II  0.46000 0.436 0.294
Group I vs group III −0.97200 0.436 0.000a
Group II vs group III −1.43200 0.436 0.000a
WHORLS Group I vs group II  0.32000 0.457 0.486
Group I vs group III  1.27200 0.457 0.000a
Group II vs Group III  1.22000 0.457 0.000a
LOOPS Group I vs group II −0.72000 0.442 0.180
Group I vs group III −0.86200 0.442 0.174
Group II vs group III −0.14200 0.442 0.192

aStatistically significant with p value ≤0.05; group I CP caries-active children; group II: healthy caries-active children; group III: healthy caries-free children; SE: standard error.

The mean value of loops was found to be the highest for group III (healthy caries-free children), which was 3.002, followed by group II (healthy caries-active children), which was 4.420, and was the least for group I (CP caries-active children), which was 2.140 (Table 3 and Fig. 6). However, the intergroup comparisons were found to be statistically insignificant (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

CP is a common pediatric disorder that begins in childhood. It was first described in 1861 by the English orthopedist Dr William John Little.8 He coined the term CP in 18899 where cerebral refers to the brain and palsy refers to the disorder of movement or posture. Inadequate functioning of the masticatory system in these children results in problems with mastication which requires constant consumption of mushy food added with decreased self-cleansing ability, leading to poor oral hygiene which in turn leads to increased susceptibility of dental caries in them. Moreover, these carious lesions keep on progressing as providing treatment is all the more difficult in these children.

In the present study, upon evaluation of dental caries status, it was found that the caries experience of CP children was higher than that of normal caries-active children and caries-free children. This is in accordance with the results of previous studies. A study done by Bhavsar et al. in Mumbai showed the prevalence and severity of dental caries to be the highest in the CP group.10 The dental status of CP children was investigated in the UK by Swallow in 1968,11 and it was found that these children had more number of unrestored teeth or extracted teeth than their healthy counterparts, which was indicative of the difficulties that these children have in assessing dental care. Abanto et al.,12 Ferraz et al.,13 and Babu et al.14 have all reported higher caries experience in CP children.

Intergroup group comparison between the CP caries-active group and healthy caries-active group was found to be insignificant. The reason might be that the special children taken in group I (caries-active CP children) were institutionalized and each one of them had a personnel caretaker who monitored their diet and maintained their oral hygiene. So, in spite of them having poor neuromuscular incoordination, they had caries experience comparable to that of children in group II (healthy caries-active children). The results reported by Rao et al.,15 both referring to mixed and permanent dentition, were comparable with the results obtained in this study. Grizic et al.16 also concluded that no significant difference between the CP children and control groups regarding caries experience was seen.

When intergroup comparison of group III (healthy caries-free children) was done with group I (caries-active CP children) and group II (healthy caries-active children), it was found to be statistically significant (Table 2). This might be because in group III (healthy caries-free children), only those children were taken whose DMFT/deft was zero.

Dermatoglyphics is the study of fingerprint patterns which helps in determining the susceptibility of a person to a genetic disease. Morphogenesis of dermatoglyphic structures like epidermal ridges occurs at the same time with the organogenesis of the fetal brain and tooth bud. Thus, the genetic message in the genome irrespective of it being normal or abnormal is deciphered during the same developmental period and is reflected by dermatoglyphics. Three types of epidermal ridge patterns were observed namely arches, whorls, and loops upon evaluation of dermatoglyphic patterns.

Intergroup comparison between all the three groups in terms of loops was found to be insignificant. So, to study dermatoglyphic patterns, in the present study, arches and whorls were taken into consideration.

Our results showed that with an increase in the arch pattern, the children had a decreased susceptibility to dental caries. Group III (healthy caries-free children) showed the maximum frequency of arches than group I (CP caries-active children) and group II (healthy caries-active children). Group III (healthy caries-free children) was the group comprising of caries-free children, and it has been proven in various studies that an increase in the number of arches indicates a decrease in susceptibility to caries. Upadhyaya et al.17 analyzed dermatoglyphic patterns in 300 children of the age group 5–12 years and had found an increased number of arches in the caries-free group. Previously, also similar results were reported by Madan et al.,18 Singh et al.,17 and Shetty et al. 2018,20 where individuals with increased arch patterns were less susceptible to caries.

In group I (CP caries-active children), the presence of arches was found to be more than in group II (healthy caries-active children), but less than in group III (healthy caries-free children). Studies have shown that the presence of CP is also associated with an increase in arches. But, in the present study, group I (CP caries-active group) is comprised of two genetic factors, namely CP and susceptibility to caries. In CP, an increase in arches has been reported by Simsek et al.21 and Bhat et al.22 The second genetic factor which is susceptibility to caries has also been reported to be associated with a decrease in frequency of arches by Singh et al.19 and Chinmaya et al.4 They have observed a negative correlation of arches with dental caries. This cumulative effect might be the reason for the presence of more number of arches in group I (CP caries-active group) than in group II (healthy caries-active children).

The whorl pattern in the present study showed a steady increase in number with an increase in DMFT/deft scores, which was found to be maximum in CP children followed by healthy caries-active children. It has been proven in studies done by Simsek et al.21 and Bhat et al.22 that the presence of CP is depicted by an increase in whorl patterns. Also, an association of an increase in whorl patterns with an increase in susceptibility to caries is established by various previous studies. Abhilash et al.,23 Madan et al.,18 Das et al.,24 Gupta et al.,17 and Yamuna Devi et al.25 found more whorl patterns in individuals with increased caries susceptibility.

In group II (healthy caries-active children), the mean value of whorls was found to be comparable with that in group I (CP caries-active group). This can be attributed to the presence of a common genetic factor that is the presence of caries.

Group III (healthy caries-free group) showed the least number of whorls, and statistically significant results were obtained in the intergroup comparisons of group III (healthy caries-free group) with group I (CP caries-active group) and group II (healthy caries-active group). This might be because the children of group III (healthy caries-free children) were taken to be caries-free. Studies done by Anitha et al.,26 Abhilash et al.23, Sengupta et al.,27 and Maroli et al.28 have shown that an increase in the number of whorl patterns is associated with an increase in caries susceptibility.

Thus, dermatoglyphics may have a role in future in helping in the identification of CP children with or those at increased risk of caries, so that risk reduction measures are taken at an early stage.

Limitations of the Study

The study participants were all institutionalized, so the result of this in vivo study may not be the representative of the general CP children. Moreover, the study did not take into consideration the variations of the patterns with the severity of CP.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this in vivo study, an association of dermatoglyphics and dental caries was observed in normal and CP children and the following conclusions were drawn.

  • The whorls were found to be the highest for CP caries-active children and arches were found to be the highest for healthy caries-free children.

  • When the intergroup comparison for the whorls and arches was done, it was found to be statistically insignificant between CP caries-active children and healthy caries-active children.

  • DMFT/deft was found to be the highest for the CP caries-active children followed by the healthy caries-active group and was the least for the healthy caries-free group.

  • When the intergroup comparison for DMFT/deft was done, it was found to be statistically significant among all the groups except when CP caries-active children and healthy caries-active children were compared.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The results of the present study raise awareness about the oral hygiene of the special children, especially CP and difficulty faced by the dentists in providing oral care to them. Dermatoglyphics, if used in such situations, would provide a vital component in the search for an acceptable, accurate, and cost-effective tool for the preliminary diagnosis, especially in diseases of suspected genetic origin-like dental caries and CP.

Why this Article is Important to Pediatric Dentists

Achievement and maintaining optimum oral health is the main obstacle in children with CP. This article highlights dermatoglyphics as a hope in the prediction of dental caries before its initiation, giving time to pediatric dentists to implement preventive measures before the caries sets in.

What this Article Adds

Considering the importance of dermatoglyphics and its correlation with dental caries in diseases with suspected genetic basis, it is important to spread awareness among dentists regarding the knowledge of dermatoglyphics. The results described in this article can help dentists to make use of dermatoglyphics as a noninvasive, inexpensive, and effective indicator for dental caries, especially in developing countries like India.

Footnotes

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sinha N, Singh, B, et al. Comparison of oral health status between children with cerebral palsy and normal children in India: a Case control study. J Indian Soc Perodontol. 2015;10(1):78–82. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.145800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kliegman,, Behrman,, et al. Nelson textbook of Pediatrics. 18th ed., Saunders Elseiver; 2008. pp. 2494–2496. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bretz W, Corby P, et al. Evidence of a contribution of genetic factors to dental caries risk. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2003 Dec;3(4):185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2003.11.002. DOI: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chinmmaya B, Smitha S, et al. Dermatoglyphics: an indicator of dental caries in Humans. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2016;14:272–275. doi: 10.4103/2319-5932.187175. DOI: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khokhar V, Gharvi T, et al. Dermatoglyphic interpretation of dental caries: An in vivo study. Int J Dent Med Res. 2015 Mar-Apr;1(16):54–56. 2015; [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Singh E, Saha S, et al. Association of Dermatoglyphic Peculiarities with dental Caries in Preschool Children of Lucknow, India. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):39–44. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1331. DOI: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prabhu N, Issrani R, et al. Dermatoglyphics in health and oral diseases. JSM Dent. 2014;2(4):1044–1048. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fernandes S, Marinho C, et al. Oral cavity Alterations Diagnosis in cerebral palsy subjects. JSM Health Education and primary Health Care. 2017;2(2):1029–1032. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sehrawat N, Marwaha K, et al. Cerebral palsy: a dental update. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;7(2):109–118. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1247. DOI: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bhavsar JP, Damle SG., et al. Dental caries and oral hygiene amongst 12–14 years old handicapped children of Mumbai, India. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 1995;13(1):3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pope J, Curzon M, et al. The dental status of cerebral palsied children. Pediatr Dent. 1991 May-Jun;13:156–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abanto J, Ortega AO, et al. Impact of oral diseases and disorders on oral health related quality of life of children with cerebral palsy. Spec Care Dentist. 2014;34(2):56–63. doi: 10.1111/scd.12028. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ferraz NK, Tataounoff J, et al. Mechanical control of biofilm in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized control trial. Int J Pediatr Dent. 2015;25:213–220. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12132. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Subramanium P, Das M, et al. Assessment of Salivary Total Antioxidant Levels and oral health status in children with cerebral palsy. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;38:236–239. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.tv26g158q7343287. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rao D, Hegde A, et al. Oral Hygiene of Disabled children and adolescents attending special schools of South Canara, India. Hong Kong Dent J. 2005;2:107–113. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grzic R, Bakarcić D, et al. Dental Health and Dental Care in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Coll. Antropol. 2011;3:761–764. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Upadhyaya N, Gupta S, et al. Dermatoglyphics: a new diagnostic tool in dental caries prediction. EC Dent Sci. 2017;14(4):174–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Madan N, Rathnam A, et al. Palmistry: a tool for dental caries prediction!. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22:213–218. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.84289. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Singh E, Saha S, et al. Association of Dermatoglyphic Peculiarities with dental Caries in Preschool Children of Lucknow, India. Int J Clin Paediatr Den. 2016 Jan-Mar;9(1):39–44. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1331. DOI: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shetty C, Hegde M, et al. Correlation between dental caries with salivary flow, pH, and Buffering Capacity in Adult South Indian Population: An In vivo Study. Int J Res Ayurveda Pharm. 2013 Mar-Apr;4(2):219–223. doi: 10.7897/2277-4343.04226. DOI: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Simsek S, Taskiran H, et al. Dermatoglyphic analyses in children with cerebral palsy. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2012;6(2):24–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bhat GH, Makhdoomi A, et al. Dermatoglyphics: in health and disease-a review. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014;2(1):31–37. doi: 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20140207. DOI: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abhilash PR, Divyashree R, et al. Dermatoglyphics in Patients with dental caries: a study on 1250 individuals. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(3):266–274. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1135. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Das N, Bezboruah G, et al. Study on the Clinical Profile of Patients with Cerebral Palsy. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2016 Jul;15(7):54–58. doi: 10.9790/0853-150755458. DOI: [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yamuna D, Dineshshankar J, et al. Dermatoglyphic patterns and salivary pH in subjects with and without dental caries: a cross sectional study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015 Jul;6:295–297. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.159979. DOI: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Anitha C, Konde S, et al. Dermatoglyphics: a genetic marker of early childhood caries. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014 Jul-Sep;32(3):220–224. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.135828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sengupta A, Bazmi B, et al. A cross sectional study of dermatoglyphics and dental caries in Bengalee children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2013;3:245–248. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.121823. DOI: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maroli S, Korrai B, et al. An In vivo Investigation into an Inexpensive Diagnostic tool for predicting susceptibility to dental Caries. J Adv Oral Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;7(3):26–30. doi: 10.1177/2229411220160305. DOI: [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing (P) Ltd.

RESOURCES