Skip to main content
NCBI home page
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife logoLink to International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife
. 2019 Aug 9;10:164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.08.001

New genotypes and molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pet birds in Southwestern China

Lei Deng a,1, Chan-Juan Yue b,1, Yi-Jun Chai a,1, Wu-You Wang a,1, Xiao-Yan Su b, Zi-Yao Zhou a, Long-Qiong Wang b, Ling-Yu Li a, Hai-Feng Liu a, Zhi-Jun Zhong a, Sui-Zhong Cao a, Yan-Chun Hu a, Hua-Lin Fu a, Guang-Neng Peng a,⁎
PMCID: PMC6811997  PMID: 31667078

Abstract:

Enterocytozoon bieneusi, a unicellular enteric microsporidian parasite, can infect humans and a wide range of animals throughout the world. Although E. bieneusi has been identified in many animals, there is no information regarding the genotypes of E. bieneusi in pet birds in China. Birds are important sources of emerging infectious diseases that affect humans, and immunosuppressed individuals can be exposed to potential zoonotic agents shed by birds. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence and genotypic diversity of E. bieneusi in pet birds, as well as assessed its zoonotic potential. A total of 387 fecal samples were collected from Psittaciformes (n = 295), Passeriformes (n = 67), and Galliformes (n = 16) from four pet markets in Sichuan province, Southwestern China. The overall prevalence of E. bieneusi in pet birds was 25.1% based on nested polymerase chain reaction analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene (Psittaciformes, 21.7%; Passeriformes, 37.3%; Galliformes, 50.0%). Eight genotypes of E. bieneusi were identified, including five known genotypes (D, SC02, BEB6, CHB1, and MJ5) and three novel genotypes (SCB-I, SCB-II, and SCB-III). In phylogenetic analysis, genotypes D and SC02 and one novel genotype SCB-II were clustered within group 1, genotype BEB6 was classified within group 2, and the remaining genotypes (CHB1, MJ5, SCB-I, and SCB-III) clustered with group 10. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of E. bieneusi infection in pet birds in China. Genotypes D, SC02, and BEB6 that have been previously identified in humans, were found in pet birds in this study, suggesting that these pet birds can be a potential source of human microsporidiosis in China.

Keywords: Enterocytozoon bieneusi, ITS, Pet bird, Zoonotic potential, China

Highlights

  • •

    This is the first to report the prevalence of E. bieneusi in pet birds in China.

  • •

    The overall prevalence of E. bieneusi was 25.1% (97/387) based on PCR analysis of the ITS region of the ribosomal RNA gene.

  • •

    Five known genotypes (D, SC02, BEB6, CHB1, and MJ5) and three novel genotypes (SCB-I, SCB-II, and SCB-III) were identified.

  • •

    This study will enrich the epidemiological data of E. bieneusi infection in China.

1. Introduction

Microsporidia, classified as fungi, are unicellular and obligate intracellular eukaryotes regarded as emerging opportunistic human pathogens (Matos et al., 2012). To date, approximately 17 species within nine genera of microsporidia have been identified in humans, among which Enterocytozoon bieneusi is the most common (Dengjel et al., 2001). Since E. bieneusi was first detected in patients with human immunodeficiency virus in 1985, an increasing number of hosts have been reported as susceptible to this pathogen (Desportes et al., 2010). Most human hosts are thought to have acquired E. bieneusi through fecal-oral transmission of spores from infected hosts via contaminated water or food, and other routes such as inhalation of spores for respiratory tract infections were also confirmed (Ayinmode et al., 2011; Graczyk et al., 2007). The clinical signs of E. bieneusi infection in healthy individuals include self-limiting diarrhea, malabsorption, and wasting (Xu et al., 2011). In contrast, in immunocompromised patients such as those with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, this infection can cause life-threatening diarrhea (Lin et al., 2013).

E. bieneusi isolates are usually characterized genetically by sequencing the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the rRNA gene (Santin and Fayer, 2010; Zhang et al., 2018a). To date, molecular epidemiological surveys of E. bieneusi have identified more than 474 genotypes from a wide range of hosts (Li et al., 2019). More than 52 genotypes have been identified in humans and 103 exclusively from animals (Zhang et al., 2018b). However, other E. bieneusi genotypes can be found in different species of animals and humans (e.g. D, CAF1, EbpC, Type IV, and WL11) (Mehlhorn, 2015). Since the first report of E. bieneusi in birds (chickens, Gallus gallus) in Germany (Reetz et al., 2002), more than 25 genotypes of E. bieneusi from 12 different countries have been identified in various birds (Zhao et al., 2016). Genotypes A, D, Peru6, Type IV, Peru8, EbpA, J, Peru6-var, BEB6, Henan-IV, and Peru11 identified in humans and birds are regarded as having zoonotic potential. In contrast, genotypes M, E, L, CHN-B1, CHN-B2, CHN-B3, CC-1, and Col 01-07 were only identified in birds and thus are considered as having less zoonotic potential.

In China, E. bieneusi has been found in humans, various animals (e.g., belonging to the orders Carnivora, Artiodactyla, Perissodactyla, Rodentia, and Primates), and wastewater (Qi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018), but only limited reports have described this pathogen in birds in China (Li et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2016). Small pet birds are popular companions and have a close relationship with humans, especially the elderly. Birds may be sources of emerging zoonotic diseases in Asia, and companion animals have been incriminated as the source of E. bieneusi infection in humans (Li et al., 2019). Nevertheless, there has been no research conducted on the prevalence and zoonotic implications of E. bieneusi carried by small pet birds in Southwest China. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and genotypes of E. bieneusi in pet birds and to assess the zoonotic potential of this pathogen.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Ethics statement

This study complied with the guidelines of the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals and was approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University. No animals were harmed during the sampling process. Permission was obtained from the China Giant Panda Protection and Research Center for the collection of fecal specimens. All the procedures were conducted in accordance with the approved guidelines.

2.2. Fecal sample collection

During the period from January 2017 to August 2018, 387 fresh fecal specimens were collected from pet birds from Sichuan province, Southwestern China. Six different bird species belonging to the orders Psittaciformes, Passeriformes, and Galliformes were evaluated, including 265 budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), 39 red-headed lovebirds (Psittacula agapornis), six mynas (Acridotheres cristatellus), 30 munias (Lonchura striata), 31 zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), and 16 quails (Coturnix coturnix) (Table 1). All birds were kept individually in small cages and bird ages ranged from 30 to 360 days. Approximately 30–50 g fecal samples were collected from the bottom of each cage after defecation by using sterile disposal latex gloves and then immediately placed into individual disposable plastic bags. All fecal specimens were stored at 4 °C until processing.

Table 1.

Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in different pet bird species.

Order Common name (Scientific name) No. of examined No. of positive Prevalence (%) 95% confidence intervals Genotypes (n)
Psittaciformes Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) 265 54 20.4% 15.5–25.2 D (20), SC02 (18), BEB6 (9), CHB1 (3), SCB-I (3), SCB-II (1)
Red-headed Lovebird (Psittacula agapornis) 39 10 25.6% 11.9–39.3 SC02 (7), D (3)
Subtotal 295 64 21.7% 17.0–26.4 D (23), SC02 (25), BEB6 (9), CHB1 (3), SCB-I (3), SCB-II (1)
Passeriformes Myna (Acridotheres cristatellus) 6 1 16.7% 0–46.5 CHB1 (1)
Munia (Lonchura striata) 30 18 60% 42.5–77.5 D (10), BEB6 (5), MJ5 (3)
Zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) 31 6 19.4% 5.4–33.3 D (4), SCB-III (2)
Subtotal 67 25 37.3% 25.7–48.9 D (14), BEB6 (5), MJ5 (3), SCB-III (2), CHB1 (1)
Galliformes Quail (Coturnix coturnix) 16 8 50% 25.5–74.5 D (4), SC02 (4)
Total 387 97 25.1% 20.7–29.4 D (41), SC02 (29), BEB6 (14), CHB1 (4), MJ5 (3), SCB-I (3), SCB-II (1), SCB-III (2)
Open in a new tab

2.3. DNA extraction

Fecal specimens were washed three times in distilled water with centrifugation at 3,000×g for 10 min to remove potassium dichromate. DNA was extracted from 200 mg fecal specimens using an E.Z.N.A. Stool DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C.

2.4. PCR amplification

A nested PCR targeting a ~392-bp fragment of the ITS rRNA sequence was used to determine the genotypes of E. bieneusi. The primers were EBITS3 (5′-GGTCATAGGGATGAAGAG-3′) and EBITS4 (5′-TTCGAGTTCTTTCGCGCTC-3′) for the primary PCR and EBITS1 (5′-GCTCTGAATATCTATGGCT-3′) and EBITS2.4 (5′-ATCGCCGACGGATCCAAGTG-3′) for the secondary PCR (Buckholt et al., 2002). TaKaRa Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa Bio, Tokyo, Japan) was used for all PCR amplifications. The cycling conditions for both primary and secondary PCRs were: 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 54 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; followed by 72 °C for 10 min. Positive and negative controls with no DNA added were included in all PCR tests. All secondary PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels and were visualized after staining with ethidium bromide.

2.5. Nucleotide sequencing and analysis

The secondary PCR products of the predicted size (approximately 392 bp) were directly sequenced by Life Technologies (Guangzhou, China) using a BigDye® Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Nucleotide sequence accuracy was confirmed by sequencing two separate PCR products. Nucleotide sequences obtained in the present study and reference sequences downloaded from GenBank were aligned with each other using Clustal X 2.0 (http://www.clustal.org/) to determine the genotypes. Representative nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank with the following accession numbers: MK301522-MK301529. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

2.6. Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analyses were performed using sequences obtained in the present study and published sequences obtained from GenBank. The substitution model that best fit the dataset was selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) implemented in ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017). A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was constructed in PhyML version 3.0 (Guindon et al., 2010), with 1000 bootstrap replicates and the nearest neighbor interchange (NNI) branch search algorithm. Finally, the phylogenetic trees were displayed using TreeView (Page, 2002).

2.7. Statistical analysis

The prevalence of E. bieneusi were compared using the chi-square test and 95% confidence intervals. All results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. The analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of E. bieneusi in pet birds

In the present study, 97 out of 387 fecal specimens from pet birds (25.1%) were positive for E. bieneusi. All the tested pet markets were E. bieneusi-positive, and prevalence ranged from 10% to 29.1% with no difference among them (P > 0.05, df = 3). The highest prevalence of E. bieneusi was observed in munias (60%, 18/30), followed by quails (50%, 8/16), red-headed lovebirds (25.6%, 10/39), budgerigars (20.4%, 54/265), zebra finches (19.4%, 6/31), and mynas (16.7%, 1/6) (Table 1). However, the differences among these species was significant (P < 0.05, df = 5).

3.2. Genetic characterization and genotype distributions of E. bieneusi in pet birds

Analysis of the nucleotide sequences of the ITS region of E. bieneusi revealed that the 97 E. bieneusi-positive isolates obtained here belonged to eight genotypes, including five known genotypes (D, SC02, BEB6, CHB1, and MJ5) and three novel genotypes (SCB-I, SCB-II, and SCB-III). Genotype D was the predominant (42.3%, 41/97) and was present in all bird species except for mynas. followed by genotypes SC02 (29.9%, 29/97) in budgerigar, red-headed lovebird, and quail; BEB6 (14.4%, 14/97) was identified in budgerigar and munia. Additionally, genotype CHB1 (4.1%, 4/97) was found in two bird species (budgerigars and mynas), whereas genotype MJ5 (3.1%, 3/97) was only found in munias.

Genetic polymorphism was observed among the novel genotypes. The novel genotypes SCB-I (MK301527) and SCB-III (MK301529) differed from genotype CHB1 (KU825466) and had eight and six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), respectively. In contrast, genotype SCB-II (MK301528) had only one SNP when compared with genotype SC02 (KY950533). The base variation of the genotypes within the 243 bp of the ITS sequence is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Sequence variation in the ITS region of the rRNA gene of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from pet birds. The ITS sequences of five known genotypes (D, SC02, BEB6, CHB1, and MJ5) and the three novel genotypes (SCB-I, SCB-II, and SCB-III), identified in this study, were aligned with each other.

3.3. Phylogenetic relationship of E. bieneusi

Phylogenetic analysis of the ITS sequences of all E. bieneusi genotypes detected here and reference genotypes published previously shows that genotypes D, SC02, and SCB-II were clustered into group 1. Genotype BEB6 was clustered into group 2 and the remaining four genotypes (CHB1, MJ5, SCB-I, and SCB-III) belonged to group 10 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences obtained in this study in relation to published sequences from GenBank using ML methods. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes identified in the present study are indicated in bold-type, and genotypes PtEbIX (DQ85585) and CD8 (KJ668735) from dogs were used as outgroups.

4. Discussion

This is the first study showing that pet birds may be infected with E. bieneusi, with some zoonotic genotypes identified in pet birds and humans in China suggesting that pet birds can be a direct or indirect source of infection to humans. Direct fecal-oral transmission is likely to occur in the system tested here owing to the close relationship among humans and some bird species shedding spores of zoonotic E. bieneusi genotypes. This may be the case for Psittaciformes birds that are commonly kept indoors. These birds can also contaminate water and food, therefore acting as potential indirect sources for human infection.

The first case of microsporidiosis in birds caused by E. bieneusi was detected in chickens originating from a poultry abattoir in Germany (Reetz et al., 2002). In recent decades, E. bieneusi has been detected in birds from several localities worldwide (Table 2). The prevalence of E. bieneusi in birds in our study was similar to that reported in a study of chickens in Germany (25.0%) (Reetz et al., 2002), but higher than the prevalence previously reported from China (14.3%) (Li et al., 2014), Iran (8.8% and 12.6%) (Pirestani et al., 2013; Tavalla et al., 2017), Brazil (5.6% and 3.5%) (Cunha et al., 2017; Lallo et al., 2012), the Netherlands (5.4%) (Aldert et al., 2008), and Poland (1.4%) (Słodkowicz-Kowalska et al., 2013; Perec-Matysiak et al., 2017). Previous reports of E. bieneusi in other animals have demonstrated that there are differences in prevalence according to different feeding conditions. The prevalence of E. bieneusi may also be affected by different geographical regions, management methods, host nutritional and health status, and seasonal variations.

Table 2.

Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in birds from different countries.

Country Host No. of examined No. of positive Prevalence (%) Genotypes (n) Reference
Germany Chicken 8 2 25.0% J (2) Reetz et al. (2002)
Spain Pigeon 124 19 15.3% ND Haro et al., 2005
Pigeon 7 Col 01 to Col 07 (one each) Haro et al., 2006
Ostriches 17 1 5.9% Type IV (1) Kašičková et al., 2009
Portugal Various bird 83 24 28.9% Peru6 (17), Peru6-var. (2), Peru6 and Peru6-var. mixed infection (2) Lobo et al., 2006
US Feral pigeon 10 10 100% ND Graczyk et al. (2007)
Netherlands Pigeon 331 18 5.4% ND Bart et al., 2008
United Arab Emirates Falcon 6d D (6) Müller et al. (2008)
Czech Republic Exotic bird 287 61 21.3% EbpA (31); A (24) Kašičková et al., 2009
Peru Chicken 1 Peru 8 (1) Feng et al., 2011
Brazil Various bird 196 11 5.6% EbpA (11) Lallo et al. (2012)
Chicken 151 24 15.9% D (14), Peru11 (8), Type IV (1), Peru6 (1) Cunha et al. (2016)
Captive bird 85 3 3.5% Peru6 (2), D (1) Cunha et al. (2017)
Poland Pigeon 139 2 1.4% ND Słodkowicz-Kowalska et al. (2013)
Iran Pigeon 147 13 8.8% D (6), J (4), M (3) Pirestani et al. (2013)
Exotic bird 816 103 12.6% D (57), M (39), L (5), E (2) Tavalla et al. (2017)
China Chicken 14 2 14.3% Henan-IV (1); CC-1 (1) Li et al. (2014)
Various bird 194 43 22.2% Peru6 (29), BEB6 (5), D (3), EbpA (1), CHN-B1 (1), CHN-B2 (3), CHN-B3 (1) Zhao et al. (2016)
Open in a new tab

ND: E. bieneusi genotype not determined.

In the present study, a total of eight different genotypes were identified from 97 E. bieneusi-positive specimens from pet birds, including five previously known genotypes (D, SC02, BEB6, CHB1, and MJ5) and three novel genotypes (SCB-I–III). Genotype D was the prominent genotype (42.3%), which is consistent with previous studies in chickens in Brazil (58.3%) (Cunha et al., 2016), exotic birds in Iran (55.3%) (Tavalla et al., 2017), and falcons in the United Arab Emirates (Müller et al., 2008). Genotype D has been reported in humans in Shanghai city, Henan province, Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region, Hubei province, and Heilongjiang province in China. In addition, it also identified in a wide range of animals, including nonhuman primates, livestock, pet animal, wildlife, and birds in China. Genotype SC02 has been identified in humans in Sichuan province, and also reported in a wide range of animals, such as Tibetan blue bears, sun bears, Asiatic black bears, Northern raccoons, horses, giant pandas, and squirrels (Deng et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018). The results above indicate that birds may play a role in the transmission of E. bieneusi to humans and other animals by acting as a reservoir host. Future epidemiological studies of E. bieneusi will be preferentially focused on the different hosts in the same areas to better understand the transmission dynamics of E. bieneusi.

Genotype BEB6 was first reported in cattle in the eastern United States (Fayer et al., 2007), and has subsequently been identified in birds, goat, sheep, rhesus macaques, deer, and cats in China (Md Robiul et al., 2014). This genotype was also identified in a pediatric hospital in China (Wang et al., 2013). Moreover, genotype BEB6 was found to be common in raw wastewater in China (Li et al., 2012; Ye et al., 2017). Genotype CHB1 was originally identified in Ursidae, including Tibetan blue bears, brown bears, Asiatic black bears, and Malayan sun bears (Deng et al., 2017). Additionally, genotype MJ5 was identified in black bears in Yunnan province, China (Wu et al., 2018). The fact of genotypes BEB6 and CHB1 have been identified in ursidae and here in pet birds in the same areas suggests the circulation of these genotypes between these animal hosts.

The genetic relationships between the eight genotypes of E. bieneusi detected in the present study and other known genotypes were determined in our phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2). Three genotypes (D, SC02, and SCB-II) were clustered within group 1, suggesting the possibility of zoonotic transmission and public health significance. Genotype BEB6 was classified within group 2. The remaining genotypes (CHB1, MJ5, SCB-I, and SCB-III) were clustered within group 10, together with genotypes CSK1, CHK1, and CHK2 from red kangaroos (Zhang et al., 2018b). However, further molecular epidemiological studies are required to investigate the potential of these group 10 genotypes to cause microsporidiosis in humans.

5. Conclusions

This is the first to report the prevalence of E. bieneusi (25.1%, 97/387) in pet birds in China. Five known genotypes (D, SC02, BEB6, CHB1, and MJ5) and three novel genotypes (SCB-I, SCB-II, and SCB-III) were identified. The detection of the three known genotypes D, SC02, and BEB6, which are also known to infect humans, suggests that pet birds in the investigated regions may be a source of E. bieneusi infection for humans. Therefore, further studies are needed to investigate the transmission dynamics between pet birds and humans.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the National Science and Technology Department “13th five-year” Special Subproject of China (No. 2016YFD0501009) and the Chengdu Giant Panda Breeding Research Foundation (CPF2017-12, CPF2015-09, CPF2015-07).

References

  1. Aldert B., Wentink-Bonnema E.M., Heddema E.R., Jan B., Tom V.G. Frequent occurrence of human-associated microsporidia in fecal droppings of urban pigeons in amsterdam, The Netherlands. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:7056–7058. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01429-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ayinmode A.B., Ojuromi O.T., Xiao L. Molecular identification of Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from Nigerian children. J. Parasitol. Res. 2011:129542. doi: 10.1155/2011/129542. 2011,(2011-11-3) 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bart A., Wentink-Bonnema E.M., Heddema E.R., Buijs J., vanGool T. Frequent occurrence of human-associated microsporidia in fecal droppings of urban pigeons in amsterdam, the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(22) doi: 10.1128/AEM.01429-08. 7056–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buckholt M.A., Lee J.H., Tzipori S. Prevalence of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in swine: an 18-month survey at a slaughterhouse in Massachusetts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002;68:2595–2599. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2595-2599.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cunha M.J.R.D., Cury M.C., Santín M. Widespread presence of human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in chickens. Vet. Parasitol. 2016;217:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunha M.J.R.D., Cury M.C., Santín M. Molecular identification of Enterocytozoon bieneusi , Cryptosporidium , and Giardia in Brazilian captive birds. Parasitol. Res. 2017;116:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5309-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng L., Li W., Zhong Z., Gong C., Cao X., Song Y., Wang W., Huang X., Liu X., Hu Y. Multi-locus genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive Asiatic black bears in southwestern China: high genetic diversity, broad host range, and zoonotic potential. PLoS One. 2017;12 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dengjel B.,., Zahler M.,., Hermanns W.,., Heinritzi K.,., Spillmann T.,., Thomschke A., L?Scher T.,., Gothe R.,., Rinder H. Zoonotic potential of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001;39:4495. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4495-4499.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Desportes I., Le C.Y., Galian A., Bernard F., Cochand-Priollet B., Lavergne A., Ravisse P., Modigliani R. Occurrence of a new microsporidan: Enterocytozoon bieneusi n.g., n. sp., in the enterocytes of a human patient with AIDS. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2010;32:250–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1985.tb03046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fayer R.,., Santín M.,., Trout J.M. Enterocytozoon bieneusi in mature dairy cattle on farms in the eastern United States. Parasitol. Res. 2007;102:15–20. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0746-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feng Y., Li N., Dearen T., Lobo M.L., Matos O., Cama V., Xiao L. Development of a multilocus sequence typing tool for high-resolution genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(14) doi: 10.1128/AEM.02803-10. 4822–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Graczyk T.K., Sunderland D., Rule A.M., Silva A.J.D., Moura I.N.S., Tamang L., Girouard A.S., Schwab K.J., Breysse P.N. Urban feral pigeons (Columba livia) as a source for air- and waterborne contamination with Enterocytozoon bieneusi spores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73:4357. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00202-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guindon S., Dufayard J.F., Lefort V., Anisimova M., Hordijk W., Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010;59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haro M., Henriques-Gil N., Fenoy S., Izquierdo F., Alonso F., DelAguila C. Detection and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pigeons. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2006;53:58–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2006.00173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Haro M., Izquierdo F., Henriques-Gil N., Andrés I., Alonso F., Fenoy S., del Aguila C. First detection and genotyping of human-associated microsporidia in pigeons from urban parks. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(6) doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3153-3157.2005. 3153–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kalyaanamoorthy S., Minh B.Q., Tkf W., Von H.A., Jermiin L.S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 2017;14 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kašičková D., Sak B., Kvác M., Ditrich O. Sources of potentially infectious human microsporidia: molecular characterisation of microsporidia isolates from exotic birds in the Czech Republic, prevalence study and importance of birds in epidemiology of the human microsporidial infections. Vet Parasitol. 2009;165(1):125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lallo M.A., Calábria P., Milanelo L. Encephalitozoon and Enterocytozoon (microsporidia) spores in stool from pigeons and exotic birds : microsporidia spores in birds. Vet. Parasitol. 2012;190:418–422. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Li N., Xiao L., Wang L., Zhao S., Zhao X., Duan L., Guo M., Liu L., Feng Y. Molecular surveillance of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi by genotyping and subtyping parasites in wastewater. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2012;6(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001809. (2012-9-6) 6, e1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li W., Feng Y., Santin M. Host specificity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi and public health implications. Trends Parasitol. 2019;35:436–451. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li W., Tao W., Jiang Y., Diao R., Yang J., Xiao L. Genotypic distribution and phylogenetic characterization of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in diarrheic chickens and pigs in multiple cities, China: potential zoonotic transmission. PLoS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li W., Zhong Z., Song Y., Gong C., Deng L., Cao Y., Zhou Z., Cao X., Tian Y., Li H. Human-Pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi in captive giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) in China. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6590. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25096-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin W., Hongwei Z., Xudong Z., Longxian Z., Guoqing Z., Meijin G., Lili L., Yaoyu F., Lihua X. Zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in HIV-positive patients on antiretroviral therapy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013;51:557–563. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02758-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller M.G., Kinne J., Schuster R.K., Walochnik J. Outbreak of microsporidiosis caused by Enterocytozoon bieneusi in falcons. Vet. Parasitol. 2008;152:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lobo M.L., Xiao L., Cama V., Magalhães N., Antunes F., Matos O. Identification of potentially human-pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in various birds. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(11):7380–7382. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01394-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Matos O., Lobo M.L., Xiao L. Epidemiology of Enterocytozoon bieneusi infection in humans. J. Parasitol. Res. 2012:981424. doi: 10.1155/2012/981424. 2012,(2012-10-3) 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Md Robiul K., Haiju D., Fuchang Y., Fuchun J., Longxian Z., Rongjun W., Sumei Z., Farzana Islam R., Changshen N., Lihua X. Genetic diversity in Enterocytozoon bieneusi isolates from dogs and cats in China: host specificity and public health implications. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014;52:3297–3302. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01352-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mehlhorn H. 2015. Enterocytozoon Bieneusi. [Google Scholar]
  29. Page R.D. Visualizing phylogenetic trees using TreeView. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2002 doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0602s01. Chapter 6, Unit 6.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Perec-Matysiak A., Wesołowska M., Leśniańska K., Buńkowska-Gawlik K., Hildebrand J., Kicia M. Survey for zoonotic microsporidian pathogens in wild living urban rooks (Corvus frugilegus) J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2017;64(5):721–724. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Pirestani M., Sadraei J., Forouzandeh M. Molecular characterization and genotyping of human related microsporidia in free-ranging and captive pigeons of Tehran, Iran. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2013;20:495–499. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qi M., Li J., Zhao A., Cui Z., Wei Z., Jing B., Zhang L. Host specificity of Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotypes in Bactrian camels (Camelus bactrianus) in China. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:219. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2793-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reetz J., Rinder H., Thomschke A., Manke H., Schwebs M., Bruderek A. First detection of the microsporidium bieneusi in non-mammalian hosts (chickens) Int. J. Parasitol. 2002;32:785–787. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00045-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Santin M., Fayer R. Enterocytozoon bieneusi genotype nomenclature based on the internal transcribed spacer sequence: a consensus. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2010;56:34–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Słodkowicz-Kowalska A., Graczyk T.K., Nowosad A., Majewska A.C. First detection of microsporidia in raised pigeons in Poland. Ann. Agricult. Environ. Med. Aaem. 2013;20:13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tavalla M., Mardani-Kateki M., Abdizadeh R., Soltani S., Saki J. Molecular diagnosis of potentially human pathogenic Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon species in exotic birds in Southwestern Iran. J. Infect Publ. Health. 2017;11 doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang L., Xiao L., Duan L., Ye J., Guo Y., Guo M., Liu L., Feng Y. Concurrent infections of giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, and Clostridium difficile in children during a cryptosporidiosis outbreak in a pediatric hospital in China. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis. 2013;7(9):749–754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002437. (2013-9-12) 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang S.S., Wang R.J., Fan X.C., Liu T.L., Zhang L.X., Zhao G.H. Prevalence and genotypes of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in China. Acta Trop. 2018;183 doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wu J., Han J.Q., Shi L.Q., Zou Y., Li Z., Yang J.F., Huang C.Q., Zou F.C. Prevalence, genotypes, and risk factors of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. Parasitol. Res. 2018;117:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-5791-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Xu Z., Zhaoxia W., Yan S., Xiaoying L., Xiaojing S., Shuai P., Huijun L., Ning J., Jigang Y., Mei X. Identification and genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011;49:2006. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00372-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ye J., Ji Y., Xu J., Ma K., Yang X. Zoonotic Enterocytozoon bieneusi in raw wastewater in Zhengzhou, China. Folia Parasitol. 2017;64 doi: 10.14411/fp.2017.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang Y., Koehler A.V., Wang T., Haydon S.R., Gasser R.B. First detection and genetic characterisation of Enterocytozoon bieneusi in wild deer in Melbourne's water catchments in Australia. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:2. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2577-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang Y., Koehler A.V., Wang T., Haydon S.R., Gasser R.B. New operational taxonomic units of Enterocytozoon in three marsupial species. Parasites Vectors. 2018;11:371. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-2954-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhao W., Yu S., Yang Z., Zhang Y., Zhang L., Wang R., Zhang W., Yang F., Liu A. Genotyping of Enterocytozoon bieneusi (Microsporidia) isolated from various birds in China. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2016;40:151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES