Skip to main content
MethodsX logoLink to MethodsX
. 2019 Sep 30;6:2205–2216. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.09.028

First indoor radon mapping and assessment excess lifetime cancer risk in Iran

Samira Sherafat a, Sepideh Nemati Mansour a,b, Mohammad Mosaferi b,c,, Nayyereh Aminisani d, Zabihollah Yousefi e, Shahram Maleki f
PMCID: PMC6812403  PMID: 31667121

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Protocol name: Indoor radon mapping and health risk assessment

Keywords: Radon map, Annual effective dose, Excess lifetime cancer risk, Floor, CR-39

Abstract

Radon (222Rn) is believed to be the main contributor to lung cancer second to smoking. The first national indoor radon map derived from some scattered regional radon surveys in Iran.

The arithmetic mean of indoor radon concentration was calculated to 117.4 ± 97.7 Bq/m3. The mean excess life time cancer risk (ELCR) values were found to be in the range of 0.1%–4.26%, with an overall average value of 1.01%. The mean radon-induced lung cancer risk was 46.8 per million persons. Absence of sufficient indoor radon data showed that national wide monitoring programs should be activated in uncovered areas.

Meanwhile, in order to provide further baseline values for radon mapping, we attempted to survey the radon levels inside 50 dwellings of Shabestar County in northwest of Iran. The investigation was also focused on the effects of some buildings related variables. The radon levels recorded varied from 3.92 to 520.12 Bq/m3, with a mean value of 56.19 ± 45.96 Bq/m3. In 9% of dwellings radon concentration exceeded 100 Bq/m3, the limit recommended by the World Health Organization. The average annual effective dose received by the residents of studied area was calculated to be 1.4 mSv. The ELCR was estimated to be 0.54%.


Specification Table

Subject Area: Environmental Science
More specific subject area: Indoor radon
Protocol name: Indoor radon mapping and health risk assessment
Reagents/tools: solid-state nuclear detectors of SSNTDs type CR-39, Radon mapping by ARC GIS (Ver. 10.3)
How data were acquired: All available data relevant to indoor radon surveys across country up to 2019 were collected and used in mapping.
CR-39 detectors after three-month exposure in dwellings of Shabestar county were analyzed to determine radon concentration according to the U.S. EPA protocol [1].
Trial registration: Not applicable
Ethics: Not applicable

Value of the Protocol

  • We reviewed and summarized all researches conducted on the levels of indoor radon and provided first radon map in Iran based on the published papers.

  • Public exposure database in terms of effective dose, ELCR and risk of lung cancer was prepared.

Description of protocol

Radon is a colorless, odorless and tasteless natural radioactive gas. It is a product of the degradation of uranium and has a radioactive half-life of about four days. Prolonged exposure to elevated radon concentrations has been linked to an increased lung cancer risk [2].

High background radon radiation levels has been reported in Guarapari, Brazil; Kerala, India; Yangjiang, China ; Ramsar, Iran [[3], [4], [5]]. However, not all areas have a high radon concentration and there is no way to know the radon level and consequently possible risk in a specific site before testing. Radon concentration varies across the country, so easy, cost-effective and reliable measuring radon levels at dwellings of different areas can be used to develop a national database including maps of residential radon exposure.

In Iran, Radon gas measurement was considered by the Iranian Ministry of Health since 2013 in the framework of the National Radon Measuring Plan. Subsequently, in different provinces and cities of Iran, the program has been implemented sporadically and the results of these monitoring are published in the form of scientific papers. For example, the most recent researches carried out in Northern Iran [4], Central Iran [5], Tehran [6], Tabriz [7], Isfahan [8], Shiraz [9], Mashhad [10], Hamedan [11], Ramsar [12], Yazd [13], Qom [14], Kermanshah [15], Khoram Abad [16], and Minab [17] can be mentioned. Despite some scattered regional indoor radon surveys in Iran, radon mapping has not been carried out yet to increase awareness of the hazards of exposure to radon and to target future radon surveys. So, the main objectives of this study was review and summarize all researches conducted on the levels of indoor radon and also provide map of radon concentration across the country based on the published papers.

Besides, we have tried to measurement of indoor radon levels in Shabestar residential homes in the East Azerbaijan-northwest of Iran as a case survey along with analyzing the factors influencing the concentrations. A little information on indoor radon activity in Azerbaijan district is available in literature. The results of this study could be useful in developing the radon map of Iran.

Development a first trial radon map

All available data relevant to indoor radon surveys across country up to 2019 was collected and used in mapping and producing database. The map includes data from 20 cities displaying the levels of indoor radon activity in 3441 dwellings in Iran.

Fig. 1 depicts the map of mean indoor radon concentration values in Iran. Our database including indoor radon levels and associated radiological parameters are given in Table 1 as well. However, only data from 20 cities representing 4.5% of the Iranian cities with population more than 20,000 people was available.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Indoor radon activity map of Iran.

Table 1.

Indoor radon concentration studies in different cities of Iran.

Region Number of dwellings 222Rn (Bq/m3)
Mean Effective dose (mSv/y) ELCR LCC×10−6 Excessive rate (%) Ref
Mean(SD) (Min, Max)
Ramsar(1) 500 Autumn:355
Winter:476
(Max:31,080) Autumn:
8.95
Winter:
12
3.44 × 10−2
4.6 × 10−2
161.11
216
[35]
Ramsar(2) 85 578(677) 17.6 6.7 × 10−2 316.18 45% between 400-3200 Bq/m3
15%>100 Bq/m3
[36]
Babolsar 14 88(35) 2.68 1.03 × 10−2 48.42
Gonabad 27 84(31) 2.56 9.86 × 10−3 46.08
Tehran(1) 80 80(84) 2.44 9.3 × 10−3 43.94
Tehran(2) 30 104 (31,460.2) 2.62 1 × 10-2 47.16 38%>100 Bq/m3 [6]
Lahijan 400 163(57) 3.43 1.3 × 10-2 61.74 In a majority of dwellings >100 Bq/m3
Ave:163 Bq/m3
Max:2386 Bq/m3
(Ardabil),
Min:55 Bq/m3(Lahijan)
[4]
Ardabil 400 238(24) 5 1.9 × 10-2 90
Namin 176 144(73) 3.63 1.4 × 10-2 65.34
Sar-Ein 148 159(116) 4 1.54 × 10−2 72
Khorramabad 56 43.4(40.37) (1.08,196.8) 1.09 4.2 × 10−3 19.62 10.1%>100 Bq/m3 [16]
Qom 123 95.83 (15,259) 2.41 9.2 × 10−3 43.38 24.3%>100 Bq/m3 [14]
Shiraz(1) 262 94(52) (17.4, 280.7) 2.37 9.1 × 10−3 42.66 [37]
Shiraz(2) 185 57.6 (33.06) (17,250) 1.45 5.6 × 10−3 26.1 5.4%>100 Bq/m3 [9]
Kermanshah 102
(hospitals)
11.4(4.9) 0.28 1 × 10−3 5.04 [15]
Minab 34 33.7 (8,67) 0.85 3.2 × 10−3 15.3 [17]
Isfahan 51 28.57(39.38) (3,251) 0.72 2.7 × 10−3 12.96 4%>100 Bq/m3 [8]
Mashhad 150 31.9 (12.3, 135.2) 0.8 3 × 10−3 14.4 5.3%>100 Bq/m3 [10]
Hamadan 70 108 (4,364) 2.72 1 × 10−2 48.96 [11]
Yazd 84 137.4(149.5) (5.55,747.4) 3.46 1.3 × 10-2 62.28 30% of basements >148 Bq/m3 [13]
Gorgan 218 43.99(37.8) 1.1 4.2 × 10-3 19.8 3%>148 Bq/m3 [38]
Tabriz 196 39(25) 0.98 3.7 × 10-3 17.64 [7]
Shabestar
County
50 56.19(45.96) (3.92,520.1) 1.4 5.4 × 10-3 25.2 10%>100 Bq/m3 (Present study)
Total 3441 G.M:72.05
A.M:117.4
Mean:
2.6
Mean:
1 × 10−2
Mean: 46.8

ELCR = Excess Life Time Cancer risk, G.M = Geometrical mean, A.M = Arithmetical mean.

As shown in Table 1 and in indoor radon activity map (Fig. 1), the mean indoor radon concentration levels in most cities are below the WHO action level and no more than 10% of them have radon concentration exceeding 200 Bq/m3. The geometric mean of radon concentration was calculated to 72.05 Bq/m3. But anyway, many areas of country are still not covered by this map and further surveys should be carefully designed.

Table 2 displays the comparison of global indoor radon concentrations in different countries with the results of the present study. The residential radon value in Iran is lower than Romania and Jordan.

Table 2.

Comparison of indoor radon levels in Iran with some others countries.

Countries Concentration of indoor radon (Bq/m3) Ref
Iran 117.4 Present study
Azerbaijan 84 [39]
Turkey 81 [28]
Iraq (Baghdad) 116 [40]
Pakistan
(Azad Kashmir district)
100 [41]
Lebanon 23.5 [42]
Oman 21 [43]
Saudi Arabia
(West &Southwest regions)
32 [44]
Japan 14.3 [45]
South Korea 53 [46]
Jordan (As-Salt Region) 111 [47]
Russia 48 [48]
India (Aizawl district) 48.4 [49]
Germany 49 [50]
Sweden 90 [51]
Spain 95 [52]
Greece 55 [53]
France 89 [53]
Iceland 13 [54]
Ireland 77 [55]
Romania 126 [56]
Nigeria (Southwest regions) 39 [57]
Ghana (South Dayi District) 34.9 [58]
Ecuador 94.3 [59]
Venezuela 52.5 [59]
Peru 32.29 [59]

Calculation of Annual effective dose, ELCR and LCC associated with radon exposure

The annual effective dose by the indoor air radon was estimated by the following equation:

Annual effective dose (DT) = CR × D ×H × F × T (mSv/yr) [9,18,19].

Where: CR = Radon concentration (Bq/m3); D = Dose conversion factor (9 × 10−6 mSv/hr per Bq/m3); H = Indoor occupancy factor (0.8); F = Indoor radon equilibrium factor (0.4); and T = Number of hours in a year (24 h × 365 days =8760 h/yr).

The Annual effective dose (to lungs) was obtained by equation 2:

Annual effective dose (ET) to lungs = DT × WR × WT

DT = annual absorbed dose (mSv/yr); WR = radiation weighting factor (20 for alpha particles recommended by the ICRP); and WT = tissue weighting factor (0.12 for lung) [20]

The Excess life time cancer risk (ELCR) was calculated using the Equation 3:

ELCR = DT × DL × RF [21]

Where DT is the annual effective dose, DL is the average duration of life estimated to a 70 years and RF is the fatal cancer risk per Sievert (5.5 × 10−2 Sv−1) recommended by ICRP 103.

Finally, the lung cancer cases per year per million person (LCC) is estimated by using the risk factor lung cancer induction 18 × 10−6 mSv-1 and can be obtained using the Equation 4:

LCC = DT×18 × 10−6 [17,22].

According to the Table 1 the values of annual effective doses for radon inhalation by the inhabitants were found to vary in the range 0.28 (Kermanshah) to 11.07 (Ramsar) mSv y–1 with a mean of 2.6 ± 2.4 mSvy–1. It has been observed that majority of the cities monitored for indoor radon concentration were shown annual effective dose within the recommended action level (3–10 mSvy−1) [23].

The ELCR and risk of lung cancer estimated from 3441dwellings surveyed are presented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Indoor radon risk map of Iran.

It is found that LCC ranged between 5.04 and 199.2 per million persons per year with mean value of 46.8 per million persons per year which is lower than the limit range of 170–230 per million persons recommended by ICRP [24].

Case survey: Shabestar County

Study area and data collection

Shabestar County is located in 45° 05′ to 46° 09′ eastern longitudes and 37° 42′ to 38° 24′ northern latitudes is a county in East Azerbaijan province in Iran. It is limited to Tabriz city and Urmia Lake from northwest and northeast respectively. The climate of study area is mostly semiarid and the minimum and maximum of temperature in the area are −14 °C in winter and +31 °C in summer, respectively [25,26].

This cross-sectional study was carried out during winter of 2016 on 50 residential houses which were randomly selected with an emphasis on coverage of whole investigated area from Shabestar, Khamaneh, Vayqan and Daryan cities. The location of study area and sampling points has been shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Location Map of the Study Area.

A passive sampling using solid-state nuclear detectors of SSNTDs type CR-39 was performed to measure the concentration of radon gas. CR-39 polycarbonate film placed inside a plastic holder. Detectors were numbered and for each building unit, two detectors were installed in the bedroom and living room and left for a period of three months while placed at a distance of 90 cm from the floor and away from sunlight and windows.

After three months of exposure, detectors were wrapped with aluminum foils and transferred to the Reference Radon Lab, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. In the laboratory, then detectors placed in a 6.25 N solution of NaOH at 85 °C for 3 h due to magnify the alpha tracks. The films were washed with distilled water after the time was spent to read. The automatic counting system with taking microscope images was used for counting alpha particles (tracks) recorded on CR-39 detectors, then using calibration and conversion factors track density was converted to the radon concentration in Bq/m3. All the radon determination process was carried out according to the U.S. EPA protocol [1,27].

In order to evaluation of affecting parameters on radon levels, the information about type of building (villa or apartment), floor numbers, the age of the building, the type of skeleton construction materials and cracking on the wall and roof were gathered and recorded.

Statistical analysis of the data was performed by SPSS version 20 and Excel v. 2016. The variables were normalized with the log-transformation and analyzed using parametric tests.

The average concentration of indoor radon in Shabestar, Khamaneh, Vayqan and Daryan buildings were (in order) 43.53 ± 26.93, 63.18 ± 83.4, 67.11 ± 50.16 and 63.25 ± 26.34 Bq/m3. Comparing the arithmetic mean indoor radon concentration of this work to other studies done across the country reveals that Shabestar county has a lower mean indoor radon (56.19 ± 45.96 Bq/m3), than means (117.4 ± 97.7 Bq/m3) obtained in Table 1. However, the mean value is higher than the global average (40 Bq/m3) [28].The maximum measurement was 520.12 Bq/m3 (approximately 3.5 times higher than the limit imposed by EPA) in bedroom (1st floor) of a 5-year age building with granite stones in facade and some artificially fashioned building materials (Patina) in rooms.

The minimum and maximum values in bedrooms amounted to 3.92 and 520.12 Bq/m3 while the concentration of radon gas in living rooms was ranged from 4.94 to 155.02 Bq/m3 in the studied area. Despite the large variations in bedrooms than living rooms, there was no statistical significant difference between radon concentration in these environments (p > 0.05(. The results of Pearson correlation analysis between the indoor radon and some affecting variables in radon emission was presented in Table 3 and confirmed a good linear relationship between bedroom and living-room radon concentration.

Table 3.

Pearson Correlation analysis between bedroom and living-room radon with other factors.

Variables Living room Bed
room
Building type Floor number Building facade’s Building age Building structure Floor covering Wall covering Window type crack
Living room 1
Bedroom .448** 1
Building type .353* .336* 1
Floor number −0.053 −0.294 −.509** 1
Building facade’s 0.193 −0.121 0.161 0.033 1
Building age .455** 0.05 0.327 0.132 0.136 1
Building Structure 0.238 0.169 0.204 0.082 0.053 .365* 1
Floor covering −0.01 0.052 −0.192 0.132 −0.075 −0.291 0.042 1
Wall covering 0.07 0.059 .363* −0.204 0.093 .360* 0.101 −0.279 1
Window type −0.026 −.322* −0.254 0.177 −0.097 0.104 −0.071 0.163 −0.2 1
Crack .373* .333* 0.122 0.21 0.155 0.29 0.106 −0.188 −0.007 −0.171 1

Although, some moderate associations were detected with the factors “building age, cracks on the walls/floor, window type”; nonetheless the pairwise regression analysis confirmed no strong correlation between them and radon concentration in bedroom and living rooms.

Also, a significant difference was observed between radon levels in apartment (multi-story homes) and villa dwellings (p < 0.05). According to the Fig. 4, radon content was higher in villa relative to apartments The average radon content was found to be 65.51 Bq/m3 for the villa and 34.22 Bq/m3 for the apartments. Because radon is heavier than air, it tends to sink to the lowest possible levels of homes and also its concentrations are appreciably high in isolated houses than in blocks of apartments [29]. As reported in some other studies [14,[34], [35], [36]].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Radon concentration variations with the type of building.

Radiation dose estimation

The mean annual effective doses resulting from the radon gas in different floors of dwellings in Shabestar County are shown in Table 4. The results comparison with data obtained from other parts of the country (See Table 1) suggests that the average mean value for Shabestar County is less than the calculated mean effective dose rates for other parts of Iran (2.6 ± 2.4 mSv.y−1).

Table 4.

Indoor radon concentration and their respective doses at different floor.

Rn concentration (Bq/m3) DT)mSv/y(
1 st floor Bedroom 60.41 1.52
Living room 52.14 1.32
Average 60.89 1.54
2nd and upper floors Bedroom 56.65 1.43
Living room 51.58 1.3
Average 41.15 1.04

The mean annual effective dose and effective dose (to lungs) received by the residents of the studied area in Shabestar county were estimated to be 1.4 and 3.5 mSv/y respectively (Table 5). The mean ELCR for indoor exposure in the area was found to be 0.54/100 people that is small as compared with action level of EPA, the estimated risk of 1.3% corresponding with radon exposure of 148 Bq/m3 for the entire population [32].

Table 5.

The 222Rn Concentration, Absorbed dose and Effective Dose to Lungs for studied area.

Location Average radon concentration (Bq/m3) Annual effective dose(mSv/y) Annual effective dose to lungs(mSv/y)
Total studied areas 56.19 1.4 3.36
Shabestar 44.46 1.12 2.69
Khamaneh 65.38 1.65 3.96
Vayqan 60.93 1.53 3.67
Daryan 65.89 1.66 3.99

The annual average effective doses received by residents in the villa homes (1.65mSv.y−1) are about two times the doses received in the apartments (0.83mSv.y−1).

Additional information

Soil, uranium and phosphate mines, and coal combustion can be considered as the main sources of radon release to the environment. Outdoors radon levels are generally low. Indoors radon levels, in buildings and homes especially in basements and lower floors can become much higher because of radon entrance through cracks and openings in the foundation. Health effects of radon are well known [33]. Exposure to radon often occurs primarily from breathing radon in air, resulting in an increase in the incidence of lung cancer due to damage DNA of cells lining the airways. Exposure to radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer. The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that in a country, between 3–14% of all lung cancers can be attributed to radon. This percent depends on the national average radon level and smoking prevalence [34].

To the best of our knowledge, no attempts have been made to harmonize data on the distribution of indoor radon concentration and mapping at the country level so far. To assess and compare data measured in different cities, we produced a preliminary map but it is evident the reported data is sketchy and local surveys are still ongoing. The average radon activity concentration less than 100 Bq/m3 was found in 64% of studied areas in Iran and no more than 10% of them have radon concentration exceeding 200 Bq/m3. Also, the geometric mean of radon concentration was calculated to 72.05 Bq/m3.

Considering Shabestar County, the radon data recorded in dwellings (mean: 56.19 ± 45.96 Bq/m3) is less than prescribed levels by WHO, EPA, ICRP and as well values averaged at the level of country (117.4 ± 97.7 Bq/m3). Also, the value of the annual effective dose ranged from 1.12 to 1.66 mSv.y−1 with a mean value of 1.4 mSv.y−1, which is below even the lower limit of the recommended action level of 3–10 mSv.y−1.

Due to complexity of influential factors and variability of radon gas levels, conducting further studies especially on radon release sources, local geology and soil-gas radon concentration, radon concentration in drinking water and estimation of annual ingestion and inhalation doses is recommended.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists in publishing this article.

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of MSc. approved thesis (Ethic code of IR.TBZMED.REC.1394.121). The authors are grateful for support provided by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Mr. Jafar shamsi Sis for advice and assistance during study and the residents of Shabestar County who gladly helped during the field survey. They also thank the Reference Radon Lab, Central Research Laboratory, Deputy of Research and Technology of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences.

Contributor Information

Samira Sherafat, Email: sherafatb70@gmail.com.

Sepideh Nemati Mansour, Email: nemati.sepid@gmail.com.

Mohammad Mosaferi, Email: mmosaferi@yahoo.com.

Nayyereh Aminisani, Email: aminisani_n@hotmail.com.

Zabihollah Yousefi, Email: Zyousefi2004@gmail.com.

Shahram Maleki, Email: malekishahram59@yahoo.com.

References

  • 1.U.S.E.P. on A. EPA . 1992. Indoor Radon and Radon Decay Product Measurement Device Protocols. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee G.-W., Yang J.-Y., Kim H.-J., Kwon M.-H., Lee W.-S., Kim G.-H., Shin D.-C., Lim Y.-W. Estimation of health risk and effective dose based on measured radon levels in Korean homes and a qualitative assessment for residents’ radon awareness. Indoor Built Environ. 2017;26:1123–1134. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bavarnegin E., Fathabadi N., Vahabi Moghaddam M., Vasheghani Farahani M., Moradi M., Babakhni A. Radon exhalation rate and natural radionuclide content in building materials of high background areas of Ramsar, Iran. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013;117:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.12.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hadad K., Doulatdar R., Mehdizadeh S. Indoor radon monitoring in Northern Iran using passive and active measurements. J. Environ. Radioact. 2007;95:39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hadad K., Mokhtari J. Indoor radon variations in central Iran and its geostatistical map. Atmos. Environ. 2015;102:220–227. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shahbazi Sehrani M., Boudaqpoor S., Mirmohammadi M. Measurement of indoor radon gas concentration and assessment of health risk in Tehran, Iran. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018 [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Haddadi G. Assessment of Radon Le vel in n\\e llins.:s of Tabnz. J. Fesa Univ. Med. Sci. (in Persian) 2011;1:13–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mirbag A., Shokati Poursani A. Indoor radon measurement in residential/commercial buildings in Isfahan city. J. Air Pollut. Heal. 2019;3:209–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yarahmadi M., Shahsavani A., Mahmoudian M.H., Shamsedini N., Rastkari N., Kermani M. Estimation of the residential radon levels and the annual effective dose in dwellings of Shiraz, Iran, in 2015. Electron. Phys. 2016;8:2497–2505. doi: 10.19082/2497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mowlavi A.A., Fornasier M.R., Binesh A., de Denaro M. Indoor radon measurement and effective dose assessment of 150 apartments in Mashhad, Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012;184:1085–1088. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2022-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gillmore G.K., Jabarivasal N. A reconnaissance study of radon concentrations in Hamadan city, Iran. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2010;10:857–863. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mehdipour L.A., Mortazavi S.M.J., Saion E.B., Mozdarani H., Aziz S.A., Kamari H.M., Faghihi R., Mehdizadeh S., Kardan M.R., Mortazavi A. Natural ventilation considerations for radon prone areas of Ramsar. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2014;12:69–74. http://ijrr.com/article-1-1165-en.html [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bouzarjomehri F., Ehrampoosh M.H. Radon level in dwellings basement of Yazd-Iran. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2008;6:141–144. http://ijrr.com/article-1-483-en.html [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fahiminia M., Fouladi Fard R., Ardani R., Mohammadbeigi A., Naddafi K., Hassanvand M.S. Indoor radon measurements in residential dwellings in Qom, Iran. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2016;14:331–339. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pirsaheb M., Najafi F., Haghparast A., Hemati L., Sharafi K., Kurd N. The influence of internal wall and floor covering materials and ventilation type on indoor radon and Thoron levels in hospitals of Kermanshah, Iran. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2016;18 doi: 10.5812/ircmj.25292. e25292–e25292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hassanvand H., Hassanvand M.S., Birjandi M., kamarehie bahram, jafari ali. Indoor radon measurement in dwellings of Khorramabad City, Iran. Iran. J. Med. Phys. 2018;15:19–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fakhri Y., Mahvi A.H., Rasouli amirhajeloo L., Jafarzadeh S., langarizadeh G., Zandsalimi Y., Moradi B., Mirzaei M. Difference between the effective dose of radon 222 in old and new dwellings; Minab City, Iran. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015;4:329–337. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.UNSCEAR . 2000. Sources and Effects of Ionising Radiation. Report to General Assembly With Scientific Annexes. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ansre Y.C., Miyittah K.M., Andam A.B., Dodor D.E. Risk assessment of radon in the South Dayi District of the Volta Region, Ghana. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018;11:10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.I.A. for R. on C. IARC . International Agency for Research on Cancer; Lyon, France: 1988. Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans: Manmade Fibres and Radon; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vaeth M., Pierce D.A. Calculating excess lifetime risk in relative risk models. Environ. Heal. Perspect. 1990;87:83–94. doi: 10.1289/ehp.908783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Özen S., Celik N., Dursun E., Taskın H. Indoor and outdoor radon measurements at lung cancer patients’ homes in the dwellings of Rize Province in Turkey. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2018;40:1111–1125. doi: 10.1007/s10653-017-9991-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.ICRP . International Commission on Radiological Protection) ICRP Pub.; 2010. Lung Cancer Risk from Radon and Progeny and Statement on Radon; p. 115. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ICRP . International Commission on Radiological Protection) ICRP Publication; 1993. Protection Against Radon-222 at Home and Works; p. 65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ranjpishe M., Karimpour Rayhan M., Zehtabian G., Khosravi H. Assessment of drought and landuse changes: impacts on groundwater quality in Shabestar basin, North of Lake Urmia. Desert. 2018;23:9–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mohammadi A., Hajizadeh Y., Taghipour H., Mosleh Arani A., Mokhtari M., Fallahzadeh H. Assessment of metals in agricultural soil of surrounding areas of Urmia Lake, northwest Iran: a preliminary ecological risk assessment and source identification. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. Int. J. 2018;24:2070–2087. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yousefi Z., Naddafi K., Mohamadpur Tahamtan R.A., Zazouli M.A., Koushki Z. Indoor radon concentration in Gorgan 212 dwellings using CR-39 detector. J. Maz. Univ. Med. Sci. 2014;24:2–10. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_id=3743&sid=1&slc_lang=en (Accessed 14 September 2019) [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Celebi N., Ataksor B., Taskın H., Albayrak Bingoldag N. Indoor radon measurments in Turkey dewellings. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2014:1–7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ruano-Ravina A., Pereyra M.F., Castro M.T., Pérez-Ríos M., Abal-Arca J., Barros-Dios J.M. Genetic susceptibility, residential radon, and lung cancer in a radon prone area. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014;9:1073–1080. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.EPA . 2003. Assessment of Risk from Radon in Homes. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yoon J.Y., Lee J.-D., Joo S.W., Kang D.R. Indoor radon exposure and lung cancer: a review of ecological studies. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016;28:15. doi: 10.1186/s40557-016-0098-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.WHO . 2009. WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sohrabi M., Babapouran M. New public dose assessment from internal and external exposures in low- and elevated-level natural radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran. Int. Congr. Ser. 2005;1276:169–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sohrabi M., Solaymanian A.R. Indoor radon level measurements in some regions of Iran. Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrument. Part D. Nucl. Tracks Radiat. Meas. 1988;15:613–616. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hadad K., Hakimdavoud M.R., Hashemi-Tilehnoee M. Indoor radon survey in Shiraz-Iran using developed passive measurement method. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2011;9:175–182. http://ijrr.com/browse.php?a_id=804&sid=1&slc_lang=en (Accessed 9 February 2019) [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yousefi Z., Naddafi K., Mohamadpur Tahamtan R., Zazouli M., Koushki Z. Indoor radon concentration in Gorgan dwellings using CR-39 detector. J. Maz. Univ. Med. Sci. 2014;24:2–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hoffmann M., Aliyev C.S., Feyzullayev A.A., Baghirli R.J., Veliyeva F.F., Pampuri L., Valsangiacomo C., Tollefsen T., Cinelli G. First map of residential indoor radon measurements in Azerbaijan. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2017;175:186–193. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tawfiq N., Rasheed N., Ahmad Aziz A. Measurement of indoor radon concentration in various dwellings of Baghdad Iraq. Int. J. Phys. 2015;3:202–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rafique M., Rahman S.U., Mahmood T., Rahman S., Matiullah Assessment of seasonal variation of indoor radon level in dwellings of some districts of Azad Kashmir, Pakistan. Indoor Built Environ. 2011;20:354–361. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Habib R.R., Nuwayhid R.Y., Hamdan Z., Alameddine I., Katul G. Indoor and outdoor radon concentration levels in Lebanon. Health Phys. 2018;115:344–353. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000888. https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/FullText/2018/09000/Indoor_and_Outdoor_Radon_Concentration_Levels_in.4.aspx?casa_token=zu0Bl4Q2woMAAAAA:SnnMpamjVoUyG7Zcf6hBNY88Loksi3IXInJvLoGS_mn2qwq8thwZsRJSnsGamuWxnS4mg6k2uqAjL3ma7G_2B70 (Accessed 12 September 2019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jonathan K., Raju P.S. A study on radon gas and lung Cancer incidence in indoor environment in Oman. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2016;3:17–21. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suvarna_Raju2/publication/312158998_A_Study_on_Radon_Gas_and_Lung_Cancer_Incidence_in_Indoor_Environment_in_Oman/links/5873351708ae329d621bc771/A-Study-on-Radon-Gas-and-Lung-Cancer-Incidence-in-Indoor-Environment-in-Om (Accessed 13 September 2019) [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alghamdi A.S., Aleissa K.A., Al-Hamarneh I.F. Gamma radiation and indoor radon concentrations in the western and southwestern regions of Saudi Arabia. Heliyon. 2019;5 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Suzuki G., Yamaguchi I. A nation-wide survey on indoor radon from 2007 to 2010 in Japan. J. Radiat. Res. 2010;51(2010):683–689. doi: 10.1269/jrr.10083. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jrr/advpub/0/advpub_10083/_article/-char/ja/ (Accessed 12 September 2019) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lee C., Choi S., Kim H.R. Analysis and radiation dose assessment of 222 Rn in indoor air at schools: case study at Ulju County, Korea. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2018;50:806–813. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ya’qouba M.M., Al-Hamarneh I., Al-Kofahi M. Indoor radon concentrations and effective dose estimation in dwellings of As-Salt region in Jordan. Jordan J. Phys. 2009;2:189–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yarmoshenko I., Malinovsky G., Vasilyev A., Zhukovsky M. Reconstruction of national distribution of indoor radon concentration in Russia using results of regional indoor radon measurement programs. J. Environ. Radioact. 2015;150:99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zoliana B., Rohmingliana P.C., Sahoo B.K., Mishra R., Mayya Y.S. Measurment of radon concentration in dwellings in the region of highest lung cancer incidence in India. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2016;171:192–195. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schmid K., Kuwert T., Drexler H. Radon in indoor spaces: an underestimated risk factor for lung cancer in environmental medicine. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2010;107:181–186. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Axelsson G., Andersson E.M., Barregard L. Lung cancer risk from radon exposure in dwellings in Sweden: how many cases can be prevented if radon levels are lowered? Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26:541–547. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0531-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sainz Fernández C., Quindós Poncela L.S., Fernández Villar A., Fuente Merino I., Gutierrez-Villanueva J.L., Celaya González S., Quindós López L., Quindós López J., Fernández E., Remondo Tejerina J., Martín Matarranz J.L., García Talavera M. Spanish experience on the design of radon surveys based on the use of geogenic information. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017;166:390–397. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nikolopoulos D., Louizi A., Koukouliou V., Serefoglou A., Georgiou E., Ntalles K., Proukakis C. Radon survey in Greece—risk assesment. J. Environ. Radioact. 2002;63:173–186. doi: 10.1016/s0265-931x(02)00026-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jónsson G., Halldórsson S., Theodórsson O., Magnússon P., Karlsson R. Indoor and outdoor radon levels in Iceland. Proc. NSFS XVII Conf.; Denmark; 2015. pp. 128–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dowdall A., Murphy P., Pollard D., Fenton D. Update of Ireland’s national average indoor radon concentration – application of a new survey protocol. J. Environ. Radioact. 2017;169–170:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Cosma C., Cucos (Dinu) A., Dicu T. Preliminary results regarding the first map of residential radon in some regions in Romania. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2013;155:343–350. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nct015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ajayi O.S., Olubi O.E. Investigation of indoor radon levels in some dwellings of southwestern Nigeria. Environ. Forensics. 2016;17:275–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ansre C.Y., Miyittah M.K., Andam A.B., Dodor D.E. Risk assessment of radon in the South Dayi District of the Volta Region, Ghana. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018;11:10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Canoba A., López F., Arnaud M., Oliveira A., Neman R., Hadler J., Al E. Indoor radon measurements in six Latin American countries. Geofis. Int. 2002;41:453–457. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/568/56841415.pdf (Accessed 18 September 2019) [Google Scholar]

Articles from MethodsX are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES