Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare pathologic CNS condition caused by JC polyomavirus (JCPyV) in immunodeficient patients. Immune checkpoint inhibition was previously reported to potentially facilitate the antiviral response.1
Here, we present an ultimately fatal case, where a patient with PML was treated with the anti-programmed cell death protein (PD)-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab and compare it with immunologic measurements of samples from a recently published reference case with favorable outcome.2
Case report
A 38-year-old Caucasian man was diagnosed with combined immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA deficiency and subsequently treated with IV immunoglobulins at regular intervals. In addition, he developed recurrent severe immune thrombocytopenia, responsive to high dose of methylprednisolone, azathioprine, and at last rituximab.
As Behçet disease had additionally been diagnosed, continued immunotherapy consisted of oral prednisolone 10 mg/d and recurrent application of IV or subcutaneous immunoglobulins at a 14- or 21-day interval.
In 2018, the patient developed progressive hemianopsia and left-sided hemiparesis. Multiple fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense lesions in cerebral white matter could be detected on MRI (figure e-1A, links.lww.com/NXI/A153). PCR amplification of JCPyV DNA revealed a very high copy number (2,561,955 copies/mL) in the CSF. Cellular immune status showed complete B-cell depletion (0 cell/µL) and low T-cell counts, especially in CD4+ lymphocytes (CD3+698 cells/µL, CD4+ 181/µL, CD8+ 511/µL, CD4/CD8 ratio 0.35). The patient was treated with 2 courses of pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg of body weight, 3-week interval) in addition to continued recurrent administration of IV immunoglobulins (20 g every second weeks). One week after the last administration of pembrolizumab, the patient developed a status epilepticus and required temporary intensive care unit treatment. MRI showed progression of PML (figure e-1B and C, links.lww.com/NXI/A153), without evidence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions as a possible indicator of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. JCPyV DNA viral load in CSF increased to 7,685,000 copies/mL. Pembrolizumab treatment was not continued because of the poor general condition of the patient, who died 4 weeks later.
To get further insights into the pathophysiology, we retrospectively performed a detailed immunologic assessment for evaluation of potential treatment effects of pembrolizumab in our and a previously published case (reference case), who was diagnosed for PML and initially evaluated for anti-PD-1 treatment at our clinic.2
Polyclonal immune response (figure, A) and PD-1 expression of CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells of both patients were average before pembrolizumab administration (figure, B; T1). After 2 courses of pembrolizumab (T2), PD-1 was downregulated in the presented case (figure B; T2 was not available for the reference case).1 JCPyV VP1-specific T cells at baseline were present among CD8+, but very low among CD4+ T cells in the presented case (figure, C). Further analysis showed higher amounts of progenitor-exhausted memory T cells (% T-cell factor-1+ of PD-1+CD45RA−) in the reference case2 at baseline (figure, D; T1), as well as healthy controls, and a notable increase in terminally exhausted memory T cells (% Ki-67+ of PD-1+ CD45RA−) in the fatal case after pembrolizumab administration (figure, E).3
Discussion
Very recently, a small case series including 8 patients1 with varied underlying causes of immune compromise plus one singular case,2 all treated with pembrolizumab, was published and showed heterogeneous results. One possible reason could be the varied underlying causes of immune incompetence including oncologic, viral, and idiopathic entities. In addition, our presented fatal case of PML supports the assumption that a high viral load at diagnosis negatively correlates with PML outcome,4 independent of pembrolizumab treatment, but furthermore indicates that pembrolizumab treatment might only be favorable early on. In contrast to an earlier report, decreased PD-1 expression on T cells after pembrolizumab administration was not indicative of treatment success in the presented case,1 neither was the amount of JCPyV-specific CD8+ T cells in the compared cases.5 However, because the presented, ultimately fatal, case did not elicit a marked CD4+ T-cell response, whereas the reference case had a detectable CD4+ T-cell response to viral protein-1 peptide already before pembrolizumab administration, it is tempting to speculate that a CD4 T-cell response is also necessary to sufficiently control JCPyV.6 This is corroborated by the HIV field, where the virus-mediated depletion of CD4+ T cells can lead to PML in late stages of disease, and JCPyV-specific CD4+ T cells were shown to be critical for PML survival.7 Of interest, it was shown very recently that the amount of progenitor-exhausted memory T cells is associated with prolonged progression-free survival in patients with melanoma receiving anti-PD-1 therapy.3 Fitting to this observation, the reference case showed higher amounts of progenitor-exhausted T cells before pembrolizumab administration, whereas the fatal case presented with a phenotype of terminally exhausted T cells, in particular at T2, which were shown to be less responsive to anti-PD1 therapy.3
Unfortunately, the clinical decline did not allow treatment continuation, although major adverse events after pembrolizumab administration were not observed. Although we only describe 1 case in detail, the amount of CD4+ JCPyV-specific T cells, progenitor-exhausted memory T cells, as well as the time point of anti-PD-1 administration and JCPyV viral load could be promising indicators in future studies to evaluate the efficacy of PML treatment with pembrolizumab.
Appendix. Authors
Footnotes
Study funding
The authors acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Muenster.
Disclosure
M. Pawlitzki received speaker honoraria from Roche, Genzyme, and Novartis and travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from Novartis, Biogen, Genzyme, and Merck Serono. T. Schneider-Hohendorf received travel support from Novartis and Biogen. L. Rolfes received travel reimbursements from Merck Serono and Sanofi Genzyme. S.G. Meuth receives honoraria for lecturing and travel expenses for attending meetings from Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Bayer Health Care, Biogen, Celgene, Diamed, Genzyme, MedDay Pharmaceuticals, Merck Serono, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, ONO Pharma, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Chugai Pharma, QuintilesIMS, and Teva. His research is funded by the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Else Kröner Fresenius Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service, Hertie Foundation, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Studies (IZKF) Muenster, German Foundation Neurology, Almirall, Amicus Therapeutics Germany, Biogen, Diamed, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, ONO Pharma, Roche, and Teva. H. Wiendl received compensation for serving on scientific advisory boards/steering committees for Bayer Healthcare, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Merck Serono, and Novartis. He has received speaker honoraria and travel support from Bayer Vital GmbH, Bayer Schering AG, Biogen, CSL Behring, EMD Serono, Fresenius Medical Care, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Omniamed, Novartis, and Sanofi Aventis. He has received compensation as a consultant from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi Genzyme. H. Wiendl also received research support from Bayer Healthcare, Bayer Vital, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Sanofi US and Teva Pharma, Merck Serono, and Novartis. N. Schwab received travel support from Novartis, Biogen, and Genzyme. O.M. Grauer received speaker honoraria and travel/meeting expenses from Roche and MagForce. He received compensation as a consultant from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead Sciences and research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.
References
- 1.Cortese I, Muranski P, Enose-Akahata Y, et al. . Pembrolizumab treatment for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. New Engl J Med 2019;380:1597–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rauer S, Marks R, Urbach H, et al. . Treatment of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with pembrolizumab. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1676–1677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Miller BC, Sen DR, Al Abosy R, et al. . Subsets of exhausted CD8+ T cells differentially mediate tumor control and respond to checkpoint blockade. Nat Immunol 2019;20:326–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blankenbach K, Schwab N, Hofner B, Adams O, Keller-Stanislawski B, Warnke C. Natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in Germany. Neurology 2019;92:e2232–e2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Koralnik IJ. Can immune checkpoint inhibitors keep JC virus in check? N Engl J Med 2019;380:1667–1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yousef S, Planas R, Chakroun K, et al. . TCR bias and HLA cross-restriction are strategies of human brain-infiltrating JC virus-specific CD4+ T cells during viral infection. J Immunol 2012;189:3618–3630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gasnault J, Kahraman M, Goër Herve MGde, Durali D, Delfraissy JF, Taoufik Y. Critical role of JC virus-specific CD4 T-cell responses in preventing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. AIDS 2003;17:1443–1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]