Abstract
Background
Tumor stroma associates with prostate cancer (PCa) progression, but its specific cellular composition and association to patient survival outcome have not been characterized.
Methods
We analyzed stromal composition in human PCa using multiplex immunohistochemistry and quantitative, high‐resolution image analysis in two retrospective, formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded observational clinical cohorts (Cohort I, n = 117; Cohort II, n = 340) using PCa‐specific mortality as outcome measurement.
Results
A high proportion of fibroblasts associated with aggressive disease and castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In a multivariate analysis, increase in fibroblast proportion predicted poor cancer‐specific outcome independently in the two clinical cohorts studied.
Conclusions
Fibroblasts were the most important cell type in determining prognosis in PCa and associated with CRPC. Thus, the stromal composition could be critically important in developing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to aggressive prostate cancer.
Keywords: castration‐resistant prostate cancer, digital image analysis, multiplex tissue imaging
1. INTRODUCTION
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common noncutaneous cancer in males globally.1 Normal prostate tissue consists of epithelium and stroma, which interact to maintain the physiological homeostasis of the organ. The stromal compartment comprises fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, immune cells, and a collagen‐rich extracellular matrix that is located between the secretory prostatic acini. In tumorigenesis, the normal organ architecture is disrupted, which activates various feedback responses both to the epithelial and stromal compartments. In 1986, Dvorak2 described tumors as “wounds that do not heal” and suggested that the stromal cells actively interact with the cancer cells of epithelial origin. Indeed, reactive stromal cells often form a fibrotic reaction around tumors mimicking the wound healing process.3
Recently, stroma has been shown to have both tumor‐suppressing and tumor‐promoting effects in many solid tumors.4, 5, 6 Olumi et al7 described a dramatic tumor‐promoting effect of carcinoma‐associated fibroblasts in PCa, and tumor stroma has been shown to be associated with aggressive disease features8, 9 and shorter time to biochemical recurrence using needle biopsy10 as well as prostatectomy samples.11, 12 Moreover, stromal gene expression analysis in prostatectomy samples revealed signatures specific for metastatic potential of PCa.13
Vimentin (VIM, VIM) and alpha‐smooth muscle actin (aSMA, ACTA2) have been widely used for the classification of the different stromal cell types. VIM is expressed in fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, whereas aSMA is expressed in smooth muscle and in myofibroblasts.14 The growing body of evidence for the clinically significant stromal features warrants systematic characterization of the cellular composition of the cells in the tumor stroma. However, gene expression patterns or standard IHC do not allow cell‐level classification of the various cell types simultaneously in situ in human tumor samples.
Here, we performed a quantitative analysis of PCa stroma using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) and unbiased automatic image analysis to determine the different stromal cells including fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and smooth muscle cells in situ in human PCa tissue samples. We show that a stromal phenotype with an increased number of fibroblasts associates with aggressive disease and castration resistance. The proportion of fibroblasts independently predicts poor cancer‐specific outcome in two independent patient cohorts.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Patient material
Study cohorts were formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples from transurethral resection of prostate (TURP; Cohort I, n = 159 patients) and retrospective radical prostatectomy (Cohort II, n = 350 patients). Tissue microarrays (TMA) were constructed for Cohort I by taking 1 to 5 cores per patient and for Cohort II as described earlier.15 Prostate cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) was recorded as end‐point in both cohorts. Cohort II included only patients who had non‐metastatic (M0) primary PCa at diagnosis and who received prostatectomy as the first treatment (excluding also neoadjuvant therapy). Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and androgen receptor protein expression data for Cohort II were obtained from Lahdensuo et al16 and Sahu et al,15 respectively.
2.2. Immunohistochemistry
Antibodies used in the study are listed in Table S1. Antibodies for vimentin (VIM), alpha‐smooth muscle actin (aSMA), and CAV2 (Caveolin‐2, CAV2) were optimized for mIHC using immunohistochemistry in prostatectomy samples as described earlier.17 See full details in Supplementary Information. Antibodies for PanEpi (PanCK [clones AE3/1 and C11] + E‐cadherin (CDH1) [clone 36]) were optimized earlier for mIHC.17 The amount of VIM‐positive immune cells per patient was visually scored by SB in Cohort II as “low”, “medium”, and “high” if <1%, 1‐5%, or >5% of the stromal area was occupied by VIM‐positive immune cells, respectively, which morphologically resembled either lymphocytes or macrophages. The scoring scheme follows previously published data reporting varying immune cell content PCa tissues.18
2.3. Multiplex immunohistochemistry
mIHC was performed as described by Blom et al.17 See full details in Supplementary Information. Briefly, for a 5‐plex staining, paraffin was removed from the FFPE and heat‐induced epitope retrieval (HIER) was performed. After HIER, endogenous peroxide activity and protein blocking was performed and the first and second primary antibodies were detected using tyramide signal amplification for AlexaFluor488 and AlexaFluor555, respectively (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). The third and fourth primary antibodies raised in different species were detected using AlexaFluor647 and AlexaFluor750 fluorochrome‐conjugated secondary antibodies. Nuclei were counterstained using 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI).
2.4. Image analysis
All image analyses were performed using CellProfiler19 (version 2.2.0) (see Supplementary Information and Supplementary Data for details). The threshold for PanEpi channel was set manually to exclude all of the stromal area based on visual inspection. The PanEpi detection included staining and detection of two different anti‐pan‐cytokeratin antibody clones (AE1/3 and C‐11) and anti‐E‐cadherin antibody (clone 36) for optimal epithelium coverage.20 Stromal cells were classified as fibroblasts (VIM‐pos, aSMA‐neg), myofibroblasts (VIM‐pos, aSMA‐pos), or smooth muscle (aSMA‐pos, VIM‐neg) (Figure 1; Figure S1).
The intensity of each stained marker was normalized across TMA cores of all patients. The average of the normalized marker intensity per patient was used as the final metric. The relative area for each stromal cell class (fibroblast, myofibroblast, and smooth muscle) was measured as the area of positive pixels or cell counts within stroma in each TMA core. For a given cell class, the average relative area or relative cell count in the stroma in all TMA cores per patient was used as the final metric. Cell class variables were categorized in quartiles when appropriate.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Demographics for patients with high‐quality image data are presented in Table S2. Patients with missing clinicopathological data were excluded from final analyses where the missing data were considered relevant. For example, in multivariate survival analyses, only patients with complete data for all the variables were included.
The Mann‐Whitney U test was used to test differences between two groups of non‐normally distributed continuous or categorial variables, and t test for normally distributed continuous variables. An independent Kruskal‐Wallis H test with pairwise Dunn's post hoc test was used to test differences between three or more non‐normally distributed continuous or categorical variable groups. Normality of data was tested using Shapiro–Wilk tests. Correlations between continuous variables were calculated using the two‐tailed Pearson product moment correlation coefficient function, and P value using two‐tailed Student t test. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering and data plotting were performed using ClustVis21 online tool.
For survival analyses, we used Cox proportional hazard regression model and Kaplan‐Meier plots with the Wald test and log‐rank, respectively. Proportional hazard assumption was tested for given variables using the Schoenfeld test. The percentage proportions of the stromal cell classes were multiplied by 10 for the Cox proportional hazard regression in order to yield hazard ratios for a ten percent change in the proportion.
If multiple tests were performed, P values were controlled for 20% false discovery rate using the Benjamini‐Hochberg step‐up procedure.22 P < .05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses and data plotting were performed using the IBM SPSS 24 (SPSS Inc, Armonk, NY).
2.6. Additional information
Ethical approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval for the use of tissue material and clinicopathological data was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (D:no 446/13/03/02/2009) and from the National Institute for Health and Welfare (D:no THL490.5.05.00/2016) according to the national legislation. A permission for retrospective use of patient data and the archived tissue blocks was approved by the National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health (VALVIRA, D:no 4076/32/300/02).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Elevated expression of stromal vimentin is associated with aggressive PCa
In Cohort I, 117 patients (74%) had high‐quality image data. We systematically assessed VIM and aSMA expression in full TMA cores or in the epithelium and the stromal compartment of each core. Representative IHC staining examples of VIM and aSMA in PCa are provided as supplementary data (Figure S2). VIM expression was significantly higher (P < .001) and aSMA lower (P = .018) in the stroma of patients dying of PCa compared with those of who did not die during the follow‐up time (Figure 2A). Further, stromal VIM expression was higher in high‐grade tumors whereas stromal aSMA expression was not significantly different in the different grade groups (Figure 2B).
3.2. Enriched fibroblasts and reduced smooth muscle in prostate cancer stroma associate with adverse clinical outcome
The association of the stromal expression of VIM and aSMA with aggressive cancer led us to further classify the different stromal cells as fibroblasts (VIM‐positive and aSMA‐negative), myofibroblasts (VIM‐pos and aSMA‐pos), and smooth muscle cells (aSMA‐pos and VIM‐neg). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of these stromal cell subtypes resulted in six major phenotype clusters (Figure 3A). Tumors with high grade, metastatic disease (MET), and castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were significantly enriched in phenotype Cluster 6 (n = 14 patients) as compared to phenotype Clusters 1‐5 (n = 101 patients) (Χ2; Grade, P = .006; MET, P = .005; CRPC, P = .009). Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed that patients in Cluster 6 had very poor cancer‐specific outcome compared with patients in Clusters 1‐5 (P = 2.8E‐7; Figure 3B,C). The proportion of fibroblasts and myofibroblasts was higher and the proportion of smooth muscle cells lower in Cluster 6 compared with other clusters (Figure 3D). Specifically, patients in Cluster 6 had 83% more fibroblasts but 77% less smooth muscle than in Clusters 1‐5. (Figure 3E).
3.3. The proportion of fibroblasts in stroma is an independent predictor of clinical outcome
As the “fibroblast‐high, smooth muscle‐low” phenotype of Cluster 6 showed clear association with poor survival and aggressive cancer, we then studied how individual cell types predict outcome. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and univariate Cox regression analysis showed that both having a high proportion of fibroblasts (HR 2.36; P = 9.23E‐7) or a low proportion of smooth muscle cells hazard ratio (HR 0.39; P = .002) separately predicted poor clinical outcome whereas the proportion of myofibroblasts was not predictive of outcome (HR 5.45; P = .061) (Figure 4; Table 1). Importantly, fibroblasts predicted cancer‐specific outcome (PCSM) in a multivariate Cox regression analysis when adjusted for Gleason score and age at diagnosis (HR 1.88; P = .001). Further, we validated the prognostic effect of fibroblast counts by using an alternative image analysis method based on digital stromal cell detection by nuclear segmentation (Figure S3). Moreover, the proportion of fibroblasts, smooth muscle, or myofibroblasts was not significantly different in tumors with different grade (Figure S4), although high‐grade tumors had significantly less stroma compared with low‐grade tumors (P < .001). We observed an inverse association between the proportion of fibroblast and the total stromal area, whereas the proportion of smooth muscle cells weakly correlated with the total stromal area (Figure S5).
Table 1.
Univariate HR (CI, 95%) | P | n | Multivariate HR (CI, 95%) | P | n | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cohort I | 113 | |||||
Fibroblasts | 2.36 (1.68‐3.33) | 9.23E‐07 | 115 | 1.88 (1.30‐2.71) | .001 | |
Smooth muscle | 0.39 (0.21‐0.71) | .002 | 115 | – | – | |
Myofibroblasts | 5.45 (0.92‐32.2) | .061 | 115 | – | – | |
Gleason score | ||||||
<7 | 0 (0‐3.3E85) | .899 | 54 | 2E‐6 (0‐1.3E88) | .905 | |
7 | 0.15 (0.55‐0.42) | .00029 | 29 | 0.18 (0.06‐0.53) | .002 | |
>7 | 1 | .0003 | 32 | 1 | .008 | |
Age at Dx | 1.12 (1.07‐1.18) | .00003 | 117 | 1.04 (0.99‐1.09) | .136 | |
Cohort II | 240 | |||||
Fibroblasts | 1.89 (1.17‐3.01) | .009 | 248 | 1.73 (1.04‐2.86) | .034 | |
Smooth muscle | 0.68 (0.50‐1.00) | .051 | 248 | – | – | |
Myofibroblasts | 0.82 (0.54‐1.25) | .349 | 248 | – | – | |
Gleason score | ||||||
<7 | 0.15 (0.03‐0.70) | .016 | 64 | 0.21 (0.04‐1.04) | .056 | |
7 | 0.49 (0.20‐1.17) | .108 | 159 | 0.68 (0.27‐1.74) | .423 | |
>7 | 1 | .042 | 37 | 1 | .161 | |
Age at Tx | 1.04 (0.97‐1.11) | .239 | 269 | 1.03 (0.96‐1‐11) | .386 |
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval
Bolded P values remain significant after Benjamini‐Hochberg procedure (P < 0.05).
As Cluster 6 was enriched in CRPC, we studied the non‐CRPC and CRPC patients separately. The proportions of fibroblasts were significantly higher and those of smooth muscle cells lower in CRPC cases compared with non‐CRPC cases (Figure 5A). Despite the difference, the proportion of fibroblasts predicted cancer‐specific patient survival also in non‐CRPC cases in Kaplan‐Meier analysis (P = .027) and in Cox regression univariate (HR 2.28; P = .001) and multivariate (HR 2.18; P = .037) analyses (Figure 5B; Table S3).
3.4. Fibroblasts predict cancer‐specific outcome in an independent prostatectomy cohort
The prognostic effect of fibroblasts was validated in Cohort II which comprised radical prostatectomy samples from primary PCa. In Cohort II, 340 patients (97%) had high‐quality image data and the distribution of the proportion of fibroblasts was similar to that of Cohort I (Figure S6). Univariate Cox regression analysis of the proportion of fibroblasts in the stroma showed a significantly worse cancer‐specific outcome with increasing proportion of fibroblasts (HR 1.89; P = .009; Table 1). Moreover, a high proportion of fibroblasts was validated as an independent predictor of PCSM in a multivariate Cox regression analysis when adjusted for Gleason score and age at prostatectomy (HR 1.73; P = .034). Interestingly, the proportion of fibroblasts in matched benign cores (from the same patients adjacent to tumor) also predicted PCSM when comparing the highest and lowest quartiles in Kaplan‐Meier analysis (Figure S7). However, the Cox regression analysis did not reach statistical significance (HR 1.51; P = .093) for the proportion of fibroblasts in the benign TMA cores. Benign cores were available only in Cohort II. We found no significant associations between the proportion of fibroblasts and the expression of AR or PTEN proteins (Figure S8).
Although VIM is also expressed in endothelium and in immune cells, we ensured the correct classification of fibroblasts by excluding VIM‐positive endothelium using CAV2 signal (strongly expressed in endothelium). The average difference between fibroblast count before and after endothelium exclusion was negligible (0.4%, n = 115). The effect of immune cells was controlled by visually assessing the amount of stromal VIM‐pos immune cells in IHC‐stained sections in Cohort II. We found no difference in the proportion of fibroblasts between patients with different amounts of stromal immune cells (Figure S9). Together, the effect of endothelium and immune cells on the proportion of fibroblasts was small.
4. DISCUSSION
We quantified the cell subtype composition of human PCa stroma by using mIHC, as well as systematic and quantitative digital image analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative study showing that a high proportion of IHC‐classified fibroblasts predicts poor cancer‐specific outcome. A high proportion of fibroblasts was also associated with CRPC. Tuxhorn et al23 have shown that VIM‐positive cells are enriched in early PCa and in prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and Ayala et al11 showed that collagen‐rich stroma and a low proportion of smooth muscle is predictive for biochemical recurrence in PCa. However, in both studies, stroma was analyzed with unspecific stains or single‐colour IHC. Further, semi‐quantitative visual analyses of the highly variable PCa stroma11, 24, 25 are error‐prone26 and do not allow high‐resolution, quantitative analysis of the stromal cell compartments.
Our data expand beyond previous evidence suggesting the clinical significance of stroma in PCa. Our results of fibroblast‐rich stroma predicting poor survival in hormone‐naive PCa is in line with Mo et al13 who showed that high VIM gene expression predicts metastatic potential in primary PCa. Moreover, we show that fibroblast‐rich stroma associated with CRPC, an observation supported by Thalmann et al27 who showed that human cancer‐associated fibroblasts may confer castration resistance of LNCaP cell line in vivo, suggesting that fibroblasts may have an active role in the development of CRPC. Further, we observed that fibroblasts in the benign stroma (adjacent to cancer) associate with poor outcome, supporting earlier studies where tumor‐associated stromal features were shown to be present in nonmalignant stroma of prostate28 and breast29 tissues. In contrast, the reduction seen in the amount of smooth muscle cells in aggressive PCa is attributable to the fact that high‐grade PCa tumors have less stroma in general, supported by our data showing that smooth muscle is positively correlated with the amount of stroma present in the tumors and that high‐grade tumors have less stroma.
Together, these data suggest that fibroblast‐rich stroma is not only a reaction to the tumor but is an active component in the tumor development. Quantitation of fibroblasts should, therefore, be considered in developing preventive, diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic tests for prostate cancer. Our data indicate that fibroblasts are strongly associated with aggressive PCa, therefore being a potential target for the development of therapeutic approaches.
mIHC and automatic, unbiased image analysis is a powerful tool to study solid tumors, allowing quantitative studies of single cells in situ and excluding observer biases inherent in previous studies. To test the robustness of our cell classification, we assessed the effect of immune cells and endothelium in fibroblast classification. We observed a low proportion of immune cells in PCa stroma, which is in agreement with the RNA expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas.24 Together, our controls show that the effect of immune cells or endothelium in the fibroblast analysis is likely to be negligible.
While both clinical cohorts have many cancer‐specific events, the cohorts are different in terms of clinical disease profile as well as sample collection period. As a limitation, both cohorts are observational retrospective cohorts, where therapy after TURP or prostatectomy was not pre‐determined and therefore may introduce confounding bias in patient survival. However, the fact that the same conclusions were obtained from both cohorts suggest that our key observations are robust and validated. Importantly, the fibroblast‐rich stroma was prognostic in both cohorts independent of tumor grade and patient age in a Cox regression model.
5. CONCLUSION
Comprehensive multiplexed mIHC and quantitative digital image analysis facilitates high‐resolution and unbiased analysis of the cell subtypes in the cancer‐associated stroma in human PCa. We conclude that a fibroblast‐rich stroma associates with aggressive disease and adverse clinical outcome. The study provides evidence for the clinical significance of fibroblast‐rich stroma in human PCa that could have implications for prevention, diagnosis, prognostication and therapy of prostate cancer.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
Sami Blom is an employee of Aiforia Technologies Oy, a company providing image analysis products and services. Other authors declare no conflict of interests.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors want to thank all the patients who donated their samples. Anna Sankila and Stig Nordling are acknowledged for the design and collection of the clinical cohorts. Tiina Vesterinen is acknowledged for the construction of the TMAs. Katja Välimäki and Annabrita Schoonenberg, FIMM Molecular Pathology services, which receive support from EATRIS, the European Infrastructure for Translational Medicine, are acknowledged for technical assistance in mIHC and imaging. This research was supported by University of Helsinki Doctoral School in Health Sciencess Doctoral Programme in Biomedicine (SB), Sigrid Juselius Foundation (OK, TP), The Cancer Society of Finland (OK, TP, TM), Academy of Finland Center of Excellence for Translational Genome‐Scale Biology 2014‐2019 (grant: 271845; OK), Academy of Finland post‐doctoral fellow grant (grant: 253662; TP), Instrumentarium Science Foundation (fellow grant 2018 to TP), and the Finnish Medical Foundation (TM), and The Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa (grant: TYH2018235; TM).
Blom S, Erickson A, Östman A, et al. Fibroblast as a critical stromal cell type determining prognosis in prostate cancer. The Prostate. 2019;79:1505‐1513. 10.1002/pros.23867
References
REFERENCES
- 1.Ervik M, Lam F, Ferlay J, Mery L, Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016.
- 2. Dvorak HF. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1650‐1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sappino AP, Skalli O, Jackson B, Schurch W, Gabbiani G. Smooth‐muscle differentiation in stromal cells of malignant and non‐malignant breast tissues. Int J Cancer. 1988;41:707‐712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bissell MJ, Hines WC. Why don't we get more cancer? A proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression. Nat Med. 2011;17:320‐329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gascard P, Tlsty TD. Carcinoma‐associated fibroblasts: orchestrating the composition of malignancy. Genes Dev. 2016;30:1002‐1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hägglöf C, Bergh A. The stroma‐a key regulator in prostate function and malignancy. Cancers. 2012;4:531‐548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Olumi AF, Grossfeld GD, Hayward SW, Carroll PR, Tlsty TD, Cunha GR. Carcinoma‐associated fibroblasts direct tumor progression of initiated human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5002‐5011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. De Vivar AD, Sayeeduddin M, Rowley D, et al. Histologic features of stromogenic carcinoma of the prostate (carcinomas with reactive stroma grade 3). Hum Pathol. 2017;63:202‐211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tyekucheva S, Bowden M, Bango C, et al. Stromal and epithelial transcriptional map of initiation progression and metastatic potential of human prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yanagisawa N, Li R, Rowley D, et al. Reprint of: Stromogenic prostatic carcinoma pattern (carcinomas with reactive stromal grade 3) in needle biopsies predicts biochemical recurrence‐free survival in patients after radical prostatectomy. Hum Pathol. 2008;39:282‐291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ayala G, Tuxhorn JA, Wheeler TM, et al. Reactive stroma as a predictor of biochemical‐free recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:4792‐4801. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Tomas D, Spajic B, Milosevic M, Demirovic A, Marusic Z, Kruslin B. Intensity of stromal changes predicts biochemical recurrence‐free survival in prostatic carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2010;44:284‐290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mo F, Lin D, Takhar M, et al. Stromal gene expression is predictive for metastatic primary prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2018;73:524‐532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Lazard D, Sastre X, Frid MG, Glukhova MA, Thiery JP, Koteliansky VE. Expression of smooth muscle‐specific proteins in myoepithelium and stromal myofibroblasts of normal and malignant human breast tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:999‐1003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sahu B, Laakso M, Ovaska K, et al. Dual role of FoxA1 in androgen receptor binding to chromatin, androgen signalling and prostate cancer. EMBO J. 2011;30:3962‐3976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lahdensuo K, Erickson A, Saarinen I, et al. Loss of PTEN expression in ERG‐negative prostate cancer predicts secondary therapies and leads to shorter disease‐specific survival time after radical prostatectomy. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:1565‐1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Blom S, Paavolainen L, Bychkov D, et al. Systems pathology by multiplexed immunohistochemistry and whole‐slide digital image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Fujii T, Shimada K, Asai O, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of inflammatory cells in benign and precancerous lesions and carcinoma of the prostate. Pathobiology. 2013;80:119‐126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Carpenter AE, Jones TR, Lamprecht MR, et al. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 2006;7:R100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Slik K, Blom S, Turkki R, et al. Combined epithelial marker analysis of tumour budding in stage II colorectal cancer. J Pathol Clin Res. 2018;5:63‐78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W566‐W570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Multiple hypotheses testing with weights. Scand J Stat. 2003;24:407‐418. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Tuxhorn JA, Ayala GE, Smith MJ, Smith VC, Dang TD, Rowley DR. Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8:2912‐2923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hoadley KA, Yau C, Hinoue T, et al. Cell‐of‐origin patterns dominate the molecular classification of 10,000 tumors from 33 types of cancer. Cell. 2018;173:291‐304e296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. McKenney JK, Wei W, Hawley S, et al. Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma can be further optimized: analysis of the relative prognostic strength of individual architectural patterns in 1275 patients from the canary retrospective cohort. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:1439‐1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Aeffner F, Wilson K, Martin NT, et al. The Gold Standard Paradox in digital image analysis: manual versus automated scoring as ground truth. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:1267‐1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Thalmann GN, Rhee H, Sikes RA, et al. Human prostate fibroblasts induce growth and confer castration resistance and metastatic potential in LNCaP Cells. Eur Urol. 2010;58:162‐171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hägglöf C, Hammarsten P, Josefsson A, et al. Stromal PDGFRbeta expression in prostate tumors and non‐malignant prostate tissue predicts prostate cancer survival. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10747‐e10747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. DeFilippis RA, Chang H, Dumont N, et al. CD36 repression activates a multicellular stromal program shared by high mammographic density and tumor tissues. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:826‐839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.