Abstract
Background
Cholesterol is an essential component in human development. In fetuses affected by intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), fetal blood cholesterol levels are low. Whether this is the result of a reduced materno-fetal cholesterol transport, or due to low fetal de novo synthesis rates, remains a matter of debate. By analyzing cholesterol interbolites and plant sterols we aimed at deeper insights into transplacental cholesterol transport and fetal cholesterol handling in IUGR with potential targets for future therapy. We hypothesized that placental insufficiency results in a diminished cholesterol supply to the fetus.
Methods
Venous umbilical cord sera were sampled post-partum from fetuses delivered between 24 weeks of gestation and at full term. IUGR fetuses were matched to 49 adequate-for-age delivered preterm and term neonates (CTRL) according to gestational age at delivery. Cholesterol was measured by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection using 5a-cholestane as internal standard. Cholesterol precursors and synthesis markers, such as lanosterol, lathosterol, and desmosterol, the absorption markers, 5α-cholestanol and plant sterols, such as campesterol and sitosterol, as well as enzymatically oxidized cholesterol metabolites (oxysterols), such as 24S- or 27-hydroxycholesterol, were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, using epicoprostanol as internal standard for the non-cholesterol sterols and deuterium labeled oxysterols for 24S- and 27-hydroxycholesterol.
Results
Mean cholesterol levels were 25% lower in IUGR compared with CTRL (p < 0.0001). Lanosterol and lathosterol to cholesterol ratios were similar in IUGR and CTRL. In relation to cholesterol mean, desmosterol, 24S-hydroxycholesterol, and 27-hydroxycholesterol levels were higher by 30.0, 39.1 and 60.7%, respectively, in IUGR compared to CTRL (p < 0.0001). Equally, 5α-cholestanol, campesterol, and β-sitosterol to cholesterol ratios were higher in IUGR than in CTRL (17.2%, p < 0.004; 33.5%, p < 0.002; 29.3%, p < 0.021).
Conclusions
Cholesterol deficiency in IUGR is the result of diminished fetal de novo synthesis rates rather than diminished maternal supply. However, increased oxysterol- and phytosterol to cholesterol ratios suggest a lower sterol elimination rate. This is likely caused by a restricted hepatobiliary function. Understanding the fetal cholesterol metabolism is important, not only for neonatal nutrition, but also for the development of strategies to reduce the known risk of future cardiovascular diseases in the IUGR fetus.
Keywords: IUGR, FGR, Fetal growth rates, Fetal nutrition, Placental sterol transfer rates
Background
Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a condition where the fetus does not reach its genetically determined growth potential [1, 2]. Affecting approximately 3–8% of all pregnancies it is a major cause of fetal mortality and morbidity; it is also generally considered an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) later in life [3–6]. Although its pathogenesis remains enigmatic, factors, such as disturbed blood perfusion of the placenta with events of hypoxia-reperfusion injury, increased oxidative stress, accumulation of oxidized LDL, atherogenic changes, and placental damage, have been suggested to play key roles in its etiology [7–9]. Consequently, the resulting “placental insufficiency” leads to fetal malnutrition. One component that is believed to play a decisive role in cellular growth and functionality - and in fetal development - is cholesterol. Cholesterol is the most important sterol in humans and, besides its function in membrane fluidity, it is also a precursor of bile acids and steroid hormones [10–14].
Various enzymatic defects at different stages of cholesterol biosynthesis have been reported and are linked to abnormal fetal development. The most common inborn error of cholesterol synthesis is the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (SLOS), a 7-dehydrocholesterol-Δ7-reductase deficiency. Clinically, patients frequently present with structural abnormalities of the brain, the skeleton and the skin, underlining the important role of cholesterol in fetal development [15, 16].
In IUGR, cholesterol concentration in fetal blood is low [17–23]. In particular, the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) fraction, which is the main cholesterol acceptor and dominant lipoprotein in the fetus, is diminished by about 50% when compared to appropriately grown fetuses [17]. The cause (maternal, fetal, or placental origin) of the low fetal cholesterol concentration in IUGR is still a matter of debate. In general, the fetus synthesizes most of its cholesterol de novo, although it has been estimated that 20–50% of the fetal cholesterol originates from the mother and is transferred through the placenta by distinctive transport pathways [11, 16, 24, 25]. At the fetal side, cholesterol is released from the placenta to circulating acceptors, such as apolipoproteins, and native HDL particles [26]. The hypothesis of a relevant transplacental transport of cholesterol from the mother to the fetus is supported by the analysis of plant sterols. As plant sterols cannot be synthesized in humans, their blood concentration is dependent on ingestion or, in case of the fetus, solely on the amount transported from the mother through the placenta. Plant sterols use the same transport mechanisms as cholesterol and can be detected in relevant concentrations in amniotic fluid and umbilical cord blood [11, 27].
In this study, we measured biochemical markers of cholesterol biosynthesis, lanosterol, lathosterol, and desmosterol, in venous umbilical cord sera of IUGR and normally grown fetuses. We also determined 5α-cholestanol and the most prominent plant sterols, campesterol and ß-sitosterol levels, assuming these to be valid markers to estimate materno-fetal cholesterol transport. Finally, we estimated oxysterol concentrations as a means of cholesterol catabolism.
We hypothesized that a diminished fetal cholesterol concentration is caused by a reduced maternal cholesterol supply as a consequence of placental insufficiency and disturbed transport pathways through the placenta.
Methods
Biomaterial for this case control study was sampled prospectively at the University Hospital of the RWTH Aachen, Germany. Patients were included between March 2008 and March 2012. Prior to the study, a power analysis was performed. Calculating the minimum required sample size on the basis of the fetal HDL cholesterol concentration, choosing a power (1–β-error) of 80% and a level of significance (α-error) below 0.05 for each group, IUGR and control group (CTRL), at least five patients had to be included in each group.
Clinical data were recorded at inclusion and following delivery. Gestational age was calculated by the last menstrual period and verified by first trimester scan documentation. Fetal cord blood was sampled immediately after birth and processed as described [17].
IUGR was diagnosed antenatally, as recently described, and defined in accordance with the guidelines of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the German guidelines on IUGR [1, 2, 17] as an estimated fetal weight < 10th percentile, in addition to at least one of the following criteria: (1) deceleration of fetal growth rate > 40th percentile, (2) elevated resistance index in umbilical artery Doppler sonography above the 95th percentile, (3) head-to-abdominal circumference ratio > 95th percentile or (4) amniotic fluid index < 6 cm. Of the IUGR cases, 13 were additionally complicated by preeclampsia as defined by the ISSHP criteria [28]. IUGR was subgrouped into early-onset IUGR (detection and delivery before 34 weeks of gestation) and late-onset IUGR (detection and delivery at 34 weeks of gestation or later). Fetal and neonatal birth weight centiles were determined according to the population-based newborn weight charts [29]. Additionally, customized centiles were calculated by use of the online platform www.gestation.net (Gardosi J, Francis A. Customised weight centile calculator. GROWTH V6.7.6.11 (DE)).
A total of 299 patients giving birth at our University Hospital were enrolled during the study period. Of those, we identified 49 IUGR cases with sufficient serum volume to be used further for the scheduled investigation. Thirty-six of the IUGR fetuses needed mandatory preterm delivery before 37 weeks of gestation (WOG). The IUGR cases were matched with CTRL as closely as possible for maternal age, gestational age, fetal gender, betamethasone administration, maternal smoking habits, and maternal body mass index (BMI). Neonatal weight in the CTRL group was within the 10th and 90th percentiles. Thirty-two of the 49 CTRL fetuses were born preterm before 37 WOG for various reasons (including premature rupture of the membrane, spontaneous onset of labor, and vaginal bleeding). None of the CTRL mothers suffered from hypertension or preeclampsia.
Exclusion criteria were defined as multiple gestation, fetal anomalies, abnormal fetal karyotype, patients with clinical or biochemical signs of infection, positive toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex, and HIV (TORCH) screening results, maternal diabetes mellitus/gestational diabetes or other severe maternal metabolic disorders, and the patient’s withdrawal from the study. Sample storage times and conditions were equal for all groups.
Blood sampling, serum generation, and storage of aliquots
Blood samples (up to 4.9 mL each) were taken postnatally from a double-clamped umbilical cord vein using Monovette syringes (Serum 4.9 mL Monovette; Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). After incubation at room temperature for 15–30 min, samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 min. Serum was aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C.
Basic serum lipid profiling
Analysis of serum triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), LDL- and HDL cholesterol was performed by colorimetric enzymatic methods using an automated photometric measuring unit (Roche/Hitachi Modular P800; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) as described [17].
Cholesterol, non-cholesterol sterols and oxysterols measurements
After thawing, butylated hydroxytoluene as radical scavenger (antioxidant) and 5α-cholestane, epicoprostanol, and deuterium labelled oxysterols were added as internal standards for the quantification of targets, respectively, to 100 μL of plasma. After alkaline hydrolysis, the free sterols and oxysterols were extracted using cyclohexane and silylated to their corresponding (di) trimethylsilyl ethers prior to gas chromatographic (GC) separation. Cholesterol was determined by flame-ionization detection (FID), the non-cholesterol sterols and oxysterols by selected-ion monitoring mass spectrometry (MS-SIM) as previously described in detail [30–32].
Statistics
nQuery Advisor 7.0 (Janet D. Elashoff (2007), CA, USA) was used for sample size calculation. Data analysis was conducted using the Prism Version 6.0e Software (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). Clinical data are presented as means ±95% CI or percentages. Analytical variables are expressed as median ± 95% CI. A two-tailed Mann-Whitney test was conducted to compare the metric variables of the two groups. Values were adjusted for potential confounders (maternal age, BMI, parity, smoking status, weeks of gestation at delivery, and fetal stress response (umbilical artery pH)) by residual calculation. Subgroup analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s comparison for multiple testing. Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical data. Correlations were analyzed by Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Values of p < 0.05 were regarded as significant.
Results
Study population and basic lipid profile
Maternal and neonatal characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Gestational age at inclusion into the study, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, and neonatal gender were kept similar. Maternal age, pre-pregnancy BMI, and smoking status during pregnancy differed slightly, but were not significant between the study groups, while we found a significant proportion of patients in the CTRL group to be multiparous compared to the IUGR group. None of the CTRL group and 27% in the IUGR group were hypertensive during pregnancy. Neonatal birth weight, birth weight centiles, and umbilical artery pH were lower in the IUGR group than in the CTRL group. In the IUGR group, mean fetal TC and HDL cholesterol concentrations were 28 and 48% lower than in the CTRL group (Table 1).
Table 1.
CTRL (n = 49) | IUGR (n = 49) | p-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean or % | 95% CI | Mean or % | 95% CI | |||
Maternal age | (y) | 32.0 | (30.4–33.6) | 29.6 | (27.7–31.6) | 0.065 |
Maternal height | (m) | 1.66 | (1.64–1.68) | 1.65 | (1.64–1.67) | 0.654 |
Maternal weight b. p. | (kg) | 63.7 | (60.7–66.8) | 68.8 | (63.8–73.8) | 0.085 |
Maternal BMI b. p. | (kg/m2) | 23.2 | (22.1–24.3) | 25.0 | (23.4–26.6) | 0.063 |
Maternal smoking status | (%) | 24.5 | 36.7 | 0.192 | ||
Maternal primiparity | (%) | 32.7 | 67.4 | 0.000 | ||
Maternal systolic BP | (mmHg) | 117 | (114–120) | 129 | (123–135) | 0.000 |
Maternal diastolic BP | (mmHg) | 67 | (64–69) | 76 | (72–79) | 0.000 |
Maternal hypertension | (%) | 0.0 | 26.6 | 0.278 | ||
Maternal WOG at inclusion | (w) | 33.4 | (32.1–34.7) | 32.6 | (31.4–33.8) | 0.360 |
Delivery WOG | (w) | 33.9 | (32.7–35.1) | 33.6 | (32.4–34.7) | 0.705 |
Delivery mode: cesarean | (%) | 81.6 | 83.7 | 0.792 | ||
Neonatal gender | (% female) | 59.2 | 57.1 | 0.861 | ||
Neonatal birth weight | (g) | 2246 | (2000–2492) | 1478 | (1295–1661) | 0.000 |
Neonatal birth weight centile | 43.3 | (37.9–48.7) | 4.2 | (3.4–5.0) | 0.000 | |
Neonatal customized weight centile | 41.7 | (34.2–49.2) | 0.8 | (0.2–1.4) | 0.000 | |
Neonatal umbilical artery pH | 7.33 | (7.32–7.35) | 7.27 | (7.23–7.30) | 0.000 | |
Neonatal 5 min APGAR value | 9.2 | (8.9–9.5) | 8.9 | (8.5–9.3) | 0.186 | |
Storage time at − 80 °C | (y) | 5.32 | (5.08–5.56) | 4.98 | (4.68–5.27) | 0.076 |
Neonatal LDL cholesterol | (mg/dL) | 30 | (25–34) | 20 | (16–24) | 0.002 |
Neonatal HDL cholesterol | (mg/dL) | 31 | (29–33) | 16 | (14–18) | 0.000 |
Neonatal total cholesterol | (mg/dL) | 71 | (66–77) | 52 | (47–57) | 0.000 |
Neonatal triglycerides | (mg/dL) | 21 | (18–25) | 46 | (37–54) | 0.000 |
Significant p-values are in bold
Cholesterol
Cholesterol concentrations measured by GC-FID were virtually identical to those measured with the automated photometric measuring unit Modular P800 (ρ = 0.9371, p < 0.0001). Cholesterol concentration in the CTRL group decreases with ongoing gestational age at birth (ρ = − 0.451; p = 0.001). This was not observed in the IUGR group (ρ = − 0.149; p = 0.306) (Fig. 1a). When cholesterol concentrations were related to birth weights ((cholesterol (mmol/L)) / (birth weight (g))), no significant difference was detected between IUGR and CTRL fetuses in all gestational weeks at birth (Fig. 1b). Assuming that the fetal serum cholesterol concentration (mmol/L) mirrors fetal tissue cholesterol content (mmol/kg), the fetal body accumulates twice as much cholesterol during intrauterine development (calculated as cholesterol (mmol/L) * birth weight (kg)) in CTRL as in IUGR (Fig. 1c).
Cholesterol synthesis
In IUGR, absolute lanosterol and lathosterol concentrations were 35 and 33% lower than in CTRL (Table 2). Adjustment for potential confounders had no major influence on the significance. The lanosterol/TC and lathosterol/TC ratios did not differ significantly (Table 3). We found no significant difference in mean desmosterol concentrations between both study groups (Table 2), although in the IUGR group, the desmosterol/TC ratio was 30% higher than in the CTRL group (Table 3). Findings were similar for the two subgroups, early onset and late onset IUGR (Fig. 2), but we failed to provide significance for desmosterol/TC ratio in the late onset IUGR group compared to their gestational age matched CTRL group (data not shown).
Table 2.
Total concentration | CTRL (n = 49) | IUGR (n = 49) | p-value | adj. p-value | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | 95% CI | Median | 95% CI | ||||
Cholesterol (GCMS) | mmol/L | 1.90800 | (1.75800–1.96900) | 1.44600 | (1.28500–1.61000) | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
Lathosterol | μmol/L | 4.34600 | (3.87600–4.69100) | 2.97500 | (2.67200–3.24700) | < 0.0001 | 0.0009 |
Dihydro-lanosterol | μmol/L | 0.01248 | (0.01009–0.01462) | 0.00806 | (0.00652–0.01101) | 0.0019 | 0.0040 |
Desmosterol | μmol/L | 2.20600 | (1.98800–2.50300) | 2.13100 | (2.01400–2.25800) | 0.3145 | 0.8708 |
Lanosterol | μmol/L | 0.34760 | (0.31850–0.41090) | 0.23700 | (0.21380–0.27620) | < 0.0001 | 0.0001 |
24OH cholesterol | μmol/L | 0.14230 | (0.12250–0.15840) | 0.14870 | (0.13130–0.16870) | 0.6355 | 0.8430 |
27OH cholesterol | μmol/L | 0.06026 | (0.05529–0.06517) | 0.06440 | (0.05743–0.07782) | 0.2345 | 0.3010 |
β-sitosterol | μmol/L | 0.78970 | (0.61960–0.94940) | 0.66460 | (0.56740–0.82710) | 0.2451 | 0.3916 |
Campesterol | μmol/L | 0.73540 | (0.63070–0.82030) | 0.62460 | (0.56650–0.76840) | 0.5196 | 0.3462 |
5α-cholestanol | μmol/L | 10.66000 | (10.15000–11.75000) | 9.72100 | (9.13700–10.47000) | 0.0061 | 0.0159 |
Stigmasterol | μmol/L | 0.13850 | (0.13220–0.16650) | 0.11290 | (0.10060–0.14100) | 0.0011 | 0.0060 |
Brassicasterol | μmol/L | 0.08838 | (0.07519–0.10950) | 0.08332 | (0.07112–0.10850) | 0.9605 | 0.3390 |
Significant p-values are in bold
Table 3.
CTRL (n = 49) | IUGR (n = 49) | p-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sterol to TC ratio | μmol/mmol *10exp3 | Median | 95% CI | Median | 95% CI | |
Lathosterol/TC | Ratio | 2.183 | (2.049–2.523) | 2.081 | (1.894–2.276) | 0.2952 |
Dihydro-lanosterol/TC | Ratio | 0.006 | (0.005–0.008) | 0.006 | (0.005–0.008) | 0.6267 |
Desmosterol/TC | Ratio | 1.156 | (1.080–1.259) | 1.522 | (1.399–1.586) | < 0.0001 |
Lanosterol/TC | Ratio | 0.187 | (0.167–0.206) | 0.175 | (0.145–0.206) | 0.1795 |
24OH cholesterol/TC | Ratio | 0.075 | (0.065–0.084) | 0.108 | (0.091–0.123) | < 0.0001 |
27OH cholesterol/TC | Ratio | 0.033 | (0.030–0.035) | 0.047 | (0.043–0.050) | < 0.0001 |
β-sitosterol/TC | Ratio | 0.420 | (0.354–0.481) | 0.478 | (0.418–0.558) | 0.0210 |
Campesterol/TC | Ratio | 0.387 | (0.360–0.429) | 0.469 | (0.437–0.569) | 0.0002 |
5α-cholestanol/TC | Ratio | 5.990 | (5.426–6.489) | 6.924 | (6.515–7.175) | 0.0004 |
Stigmasterol/TC | Ratio | 0.075 | (0.069–0.085) | 0.082 | (0.070–0.094) | 0.1585 |
Brassicasterol/TC | Ratio | 0.045 | (0.040–0.053) | 0.059 | (0.055–0.066) | 0.0001 |
Significant p-values are in bold
Oxysterols
No significant differences were found in absolute 24S-OH-cholesterol (24S-OHC) and 27-OHC levels in IUGR compared to CTRL (Table 2). Adjustment for potential confounders had no major influence on significance. Hence, 24S-OHC/TC ratio and 27-OHC/TC ratio were increased by 39 and 61%, respectively, indicating an increased cholesterol turnover (Table 3). Findings were similar in the early and the late onset subgroups of IUGR (Fig. 3).
Plant sterols
No significant differences were found in absolute campesterol and β-sitosterol levels, while in the IUGR group, 5α-cholestanol levels were in the mean 13% lower than in the CTRL group (Table 2). Adjustment for potential confounders had no major influence on significance. Ratios of campesterol, β-sitosterol, and 5α-cholestanol to TC were increased by 34, 39, and 17%, respectively (Table 3). However, this could not be confirmed when separately analyzing data in the late onset subgroup of IUGR (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Several studies, including our own, have reported diminished fetal cholesterol concentrations in IUGR [17–23]. Characterizing umbilical cord blood sterol profiles in IUGR and normally grown fetuses we aimed at a deeper understanding of cholesterol metabolism during fetal development and impaired fetal growth. To estimate the contribution of maternal cholesterol to the fetal cholesterol pool, we measured plant sterol concentrations such as β-sitosterol. Plant sterols cannot be synthesized de novo in humans. Their concentration levels in the circulation are dependent on nutritional intake, and, in the case of the fetus, maternal provision. At term, concentration levels of plant sterols in umbilical cord blood are 40–50% of the maternal levels [27]. Consequently, placental insufficiency and disturbed placental transport processes should result in lower fetal plant sterol concentrations. By contrast to this assumption, plant sterol to cholesterol ratios were indeed higher in IUGR than in CTRL fetuses, especially in those born preterm, suggesting an unrestricted transplacental sterol transport and a general substantial maternal contribution to the fetal cholesterol pool independent of placental insufficiency. High plant sterol to cholesterol ratios can, however, also be explained by lower hepato-biliary elimination rates of the phytosterols. The liver is the main organ regulating body cholesterol homeostasis. The synthesis of cholesterol starts with the mevalonate pathway by the formation of acetyl CoA, which is then converted to 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA (HMG-CoA) and further to mevalonate, squalene and finally, lanosterol. Lanosterol can be processed to cholesterol through an enzyme-mediated 19-step process following the Kandutsch-Russell pathway through lathosterol and 7-dehydrocholesterol. In the present study, low circulating lanosterol and lathosterol concentrations together with balanced cholesterol ratios suggest an unaffected enzymatic capacity of the Kandutsch-Russell pathway in IUGR. Hence, reduced lanosterol concentration in IUGR is most probably caused by lower enzymatic activity prior to the mevalonate pathway, or by a decrease in nutritional supply or energy provision to the fetal liver. Indeed, in IUGR, a reduced placental oxygen uptake and glucose transfer forces the fetus to increase shunting through the ductus venosus bypassing the liver to maintain nutritional supply to the heart and the brain [33, 34]. This so-called “brain-sparing-effect” results in a reduced hepatic volume [35–37], declining hepatic glycogen stores, and fetal hypoglycemia, and affects maintenance of fetal oxidative metabolism [20, 34, 38]. As a result, diminished synthesis of acetyl-CoA in the fetal liver and, subsequently, reduced mevalonate and lanosterol production can be expected.
Interestingly, and in contrast to lathosterol, the desmosterol to cholesterol ratios in our study were higher in the IUGR than in the CTRL group. Desmosterol is synthesized from lanosterol via zymosterol. A high ratio suggests either increased synthesis rates or reduced conversion to cholesterol via the 3β-hydroxysterol-Δ24-reductase (DHCR24), the final enzymatic step of the Bloch pathway, an alternative pathway of cholesterol synthesis [30]. The Bloch pathway is particularly activated in the fetal brain and desmosterol transiently represents up to 30% of total brain sterols during intrauterine development [24, 39]. Desmosterol might cross from fetal brain into the body circulation either via an incomplete blood-brain barrier (BBB), or via to date unknown pathways, e.g. potential re-conversion of brain-driven 24S-OHC to desmosterol. While the latter enzymatic step is theoretically possible, a specific enzyme has yet to be described. However, the presence of cholesterol transport molecules in the BBB suggests a potential flux of sterols from the brain into the body circulation [40, 41]. This is particularly important since fetal brain cholesterol homeostasis must be tightly regulated, separately from the body cholesterol homeostasis for beneficial neurodevelopment. Almost all inborn errors of cholesterol synthesis are associated with central neural system malformations or neuro-developmental disorders [15, 42]. In line with desmosterol, 24S-OHC to cholesterol ratios were evenly high in the IUGR fetuses in our study. 24S-OHC is a cholesterol metabolite almost exclusively produced in the brain that crosses the BBB to protect from cholesterol overload [43, 44]. In light of the “brain-sparing-effect”, this finding of desmosterol and 24S-OHC suggests conserved brain cholesterol turnover rates in IUGR fetuses independent of body cholesterol synthesis to guarantee uneventful neurodevelopment.
Since cholesterol and its metabolites are catabolized in the fetal liver by bile acid formation higher 24S-OHC/TC ratios (and also 27-OHC/TC ratios) in IUGR fetuses may also be explained by reduced elimination rates. Indeed, studies on liver function of IUGR fetuses suggest a reduced hepatic activity with lower alanine aminotransferase synthesis rates [45], and higher bile acids concentrations in cord blood of the IUGR fetuses as compared to controls [46] that persists in childhood [47].
These persisting metabolic alterations in IUGR neonates as well as increased plant sterol concentrations are in concert with the known observation that being small for gestational age is a risk factor for CVD later in life. High plasma plant sterol levels have been frequently associated with CVD [48]. Campesterol/cholesterol and sitosterol/cholesterol ratios, e.g., have been demonstrated to be independent predictors of CVD [49]. Mechanistically, plant sterols promote production of proinflammatory cytokines, influence ABC transporter expression, and inhibit cholesterol efflux from macrophages [50]. Indeed, we recently demonstrated a lower cholesterol efflux from [3H]-cholesterol-loaded macrophages when treated with serum from IUGR compared to CTRL fetuses [51] possibly contributing to early atherosclerotic changes of the fetal vascular walls.
The present study has certain limitations. IUGR fetuses often have to be delivered preterm, and gestational age is one of the main factors affecting cord blood composition [17]. Hence, the study groups need to be controlled for this issue. However, preterm birth per se is a pathological condition and we cannot exclude that cord blood parameters within the CTRL group are biased by factors that may lead to spontaneous onset of preterm labor. Moreover, differences in the treatment regimens between the IUGR and the CTRL mothers may have an influence on maternal and/or fetal metabolism. For example, mothers with spontaneous onset of preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes receive antibiotics and tocolytic agents, while IUGR mothers do not. Stress also influences lipid parameters, and fetal distress is a common medical indication for delivery in patients with IUGR. We also do not have data on nutritional intake of patients, which may influence plant sterol concentrations.
Strength of this study is its well characterized patient cohort and antenatal diagnosis and clear definition of “IUGR”. The use of GC methods resulted in a highly specific assessment of the sterols of interest, avoiding the frequently observed cross-reactivity that occurs with conventional antibody-based measurement techniques.
Conclusion
We here provide evidence that in IUGR fetuses, the fetal de novo cholesterol synthesis rate rather than the materno-fetal cholesterol transfer is low. Our data suggest that reduced energy provision forces the IUGR fetus to downregulate hepatic de novo cholesterol synthesis, yet this seems to be rather adaptive and well balanced to meet fetal growth rates. Additionally, reduced hepatic function causes lower elimination rates of sterols and cholesterol end-products. This observation is particularly important, since cholestasis is a well-described complication in extremely low birth weight neonates [52] that could progress to liver failure [53] and may affect hepatic drug metabolism [54]. Our study supports the idea that specific therapeutic regimes need to be considered in neonates born IUGR, especially in the setting of neonatal intensive care management. This applies to drug administration, but also to parenteral nutrition of the neonate with plant sterol containing soybean oil-based lipid emulsions.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- 24S-OHC
24S-OH-cholesterol
- 27-OHC
27-OH-cholesterol
- BBB
Blood-brain barrier
- BMI
Body mass index
- CTRL
Controls
- CVD
Cardiovascular diseases
- DHCR24
3β-hydroxysterol-Δ24-reductase
- FID
Flame-ionization detection
- GC
Gas chromatographic
- HMG-CoA
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA
- IUGR
Intrauterine growth restriction
- MS-SIM
Selected-ion monitoring mass spectrometry
- SLOS
Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome
- TC
Total cholesterol
- TG
Triglycerides
- WOG
Week of gestation
Authors’ contributions
The individual contributions of authors to the manuscript should be specified in this section. Guidance and criteria for authorship can be found in our editorial policies. UP supervised data and blood collection, statistical analysis, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. LS, VB, and AK were involved in sampling and biobanking, data recording, statistical analyses, discussion of the results, NM, IA CES, ME discussed the results and contributed to writing the manuscript. DL analyzed sterol concentrations, discussed data and contributed to writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The study was funded by the Medical Faculty of the Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Germany, F356910, and the Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Pharmacology, University Clinics of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (EK 119/08 and 154/11). The authors complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating parents.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.ACOG ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:1122–1133. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kehl S, Dötsch J, Hecher K, Schlembach D, Schmitz D, Stepan H, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-level, AWMF registry no. 015/080, October 2016) Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77:1157–1173. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Barker DJ. Fetal origins of coronary heart disease. BMJ. 1995;311:171–174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Forsen T, Eriksson JG, Tuomilehto J, Osmond C, Barker DJ. Growth in utero and during childhood among women who develop coronary heart disease: longitudinal study. BMJ. 1999;319:1403–1407. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7222.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kaijser M, Bonamy AK, Akre O, Cnattingius S, Granath F, Norman M, et al. Perinatal risk factors for ischemic heart disease: disentangling the roles of birth weight and preterm birth. Circulation. 2008;117:405–410. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.710715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rich-Edwards JW, Kleinman K, Michels KB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Rexrode KM, et al. Longitudinal study of birth weight and adult body mass index in predicting risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in women. BMJ. 2005;330:1115. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38434.629630.E0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Biri A, Bozkurt N, Turp A, Kavutcu M, Himmetoglu O, Durak I. Role of oxidative stress in intrauterine growth restriction. Gynecol Obs Invest. 2007;64:187–192. doi: 10.1159/000106488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Burton GJ, Woods AW, Jauniaux E, Kingdom JC. Rheological and physiological consequences of conversion of the maternal spiral arteries for uteroplacental blood flow during human pregnancy. Placenta. 2009;30:473–482. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pecks U, Rath W, Caspers R, Sosnowsky K, Ziems B, H-JH-J T, et al. Oxidatively modified LDL particles in the human placenta in early and late onset intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta. 2013;34:1142–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pecks U, Rath W, Kleine-Eggebrecht N, Maass N, Voigt F, Goecke TW, et al. Maternal serum lipid, estradiol, and progesterone levels in pregnancy, and the impact of placental and hepatic pathologies. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016;76:799–808. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Baardman ME, Erwich JJ, Berger RM, Hofstra RM, Kerstjens-Frederikse WS, Lutjohann D, et al. The origin of fetal sterols in second-trimester amniotic fluid: endogenous synthesis or maternal-fetal transport? Am J Obs Gynecol. 2012;207:202. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Björkhem I, Diczfalusy U, Lütjohann D. Removal of cholesterol from extrahepatic sources by oxidative mechanisms. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:161–165. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199904000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Björkhem I, Eggertsen G. Genes involved in initial steps of bile acid synthesis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12:97–103. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200104000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shackleton CHL. Role of a disordered steroid metabolome in the elucidation of sterol and steroid biosynthesis. Lipids. 2012;47:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11745-011-3605-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kanungo S, Soares N, He M, Steiner RD. Sterol metabolism disorders and neurodevelopment-an update. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2013;17:197–210. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jenkins KT, Merkens LS, Tubb MR, Myatt L, Davidson WS, Steiner RD, et al. Enhanced placental cholesterol efflux by fetal HDL in smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Mol Genet Metab. 2008;94:240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2008.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pecks U, Brieger M, Schiessl B, Bauerschlag DOO, Piroth D, Bruno B, et al. Maternal and fetal cord blood lipids in intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinat Med. 2012;40:287–296. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2011.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Merzouk H, Meghelli-Bouchenak M, El-Korso N, Belleville J, Prost J. Low birth weight at term impairs cord serum lipoprotein compositions and concentrations. Eur J Pediatr. 1998;157:321–326. doi: 10.1007/s004310050820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spencer JA, Chang TC, Crook D, Proudler A, Felton CV, Robson SC, et al. Third trimester fetal growth and measures of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in umbilical venous blood at term. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997;76:F21–F25. doi: 10.1136/fn.76.1.F21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bon C, Raudrant D, Poloce F, Champion F, Golfier F, Pichot J, et al. Biochemical profile of fetal blood sampled by cordocentesis in 35 pregnancies complicated by growth retardation. Pathol Biol. 2007;55:111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2006.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roberts A, Nava S, Bocconi L, Salmona S, Nicolini U. Liver function tests and glucose and lipid metabolism in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:290–294. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00235-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nagano N, Okada T, Fukamachi R, Yoshikawa K, Munakata S, Usukura Y, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and lipoprotein profile in cord blood of preterm small for gestational age infants. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2013;4:507–512. doi: 10.1017/S2040174413000408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pecks U, Rath W, Maass N, Berger B, Lueg I, Farrokh A, et al. Fetal gender and gestational age differentially affect PCSK9 levels in intrauterine growth restriction. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:193. doi: 10.1186/s12944-016-0365-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lin DS, Pitkin RM, Connor WE. Placental transfer of cholesterol into the human fetus. Am J Obs Gynecol. 1977;128:735–739. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(77)90713-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burke KT, Colvin PL, Myatt L, Graf GA, Schroeder F, Woollett LA. Transport of maternal cholesterol to the fetus is affected by maternal plasma cholesterol concentrations in the golden Syrian hamster. J Lipid Res. 2009;50:1146–1155. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800538-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pecks U, Mohaupt MG, Hütten MC, Maass N, Rath W, Escher G. Cholesterol acceptor capacity is preserved by different mechanisms in preterm and term fetuses. Biochim Biophys Acta - Mol Cell Biol Lipids. 2014;1841:251–258. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2013.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vuorio AF, Miettinen TA, Turtola H, Oksanen H, Gylling H. Cholesterol metabolism in normal and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemic newborns. J Lab Clin Med. 2002;140:35–42. doi: 10.1067/mlc.2002.125214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, Roberts J, Sibai BM, Steyn W, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Voigt M, Rochow N, Schneider KTM, Hagenah H-P, Scholz R, Hesse V, et al. New percentile values for the anthropometric dimensions of singleton neonates: analysis of perinatal survey data of 2007-2011 from all 16 states of Germany. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2014;218:210–217. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1385857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lütjohann D, Brzezinka A, Barth E, Abramowski D, Staufenbiel M, von Bergmann K, et al. Profile of cholesterol-related sterols in aged amyloid precursor protein transgenic mouse brain. J Lipid Res. 2002;43:1078–1085. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M200071-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Taubert A, Silva LMR, Velásquez ZD, Larrazabal C, Lütjohann D, Hermosilla C. Modulation of cholesterol-related sterols during Eimeria bovis macromeront formation and impact of selected oxysterols on parasite development. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2018;223:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mackay DS, Jones PJH, Myrie SB, Plat J, Lütjohann D. Methodological considerations for the harmonization of non-cholesterol sterol bio-analysis. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014;957:116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kiserud T, Kessler J, Ebbing C, Rasmussen S. Ductus venosus shunting in growth-restricted fetuses and the effect of umbilical circulatory compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:143–149. doi: 10.1002/uog.2784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Baschat AA. Fetal responses to placental insufficiency: an update. BJOG. 2004;111:1031–1041. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00273.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, Kennelly MM, McAuliffe FM, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:288.e1–288.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Campbell S, Thoms A. Ultrasound measurement of the fetal head to abdomen circumference ratio in the assessment of growth retardation. Br J Obs Gynaecol. 1977;84:165–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1977.tb12550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Molina Giraldo S, Alfonso Ayala DA, Arreaza Graterol M, Perez Olivo JL, Solano Montero AF. Three-dimensional Doppler ultrasonography for the assessment of fetal liver vascularization in fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144:260–264. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lane RH, Kelley DE, Gruetzmacher EM, Devaskar SU. Uteroplacental insufficiency alters hepatic fatty acid-metabolizing enzymes in juvenile and adult rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;280:R183–R190. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.1.R183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jansen M, Wang W, Greco D, Bellenchi GC, di Porzio U, Brown AJ, et al. What dictates the accumulation of desmosterol in the developing brain? FASEB J. 2013;27:865–870. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-211235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gosselet F, Candela P, Sevin E, Berezowski V, Cecchelli R, Fenart L. Transcriptional profiles of receptors and transporters involved in brain cholesterol homeostasis at the blood-brain barrier: use of an in vitro model. Brain Res. 2009;1249:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.10.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kober AC, Manavalan APC, Tam-Amersdorfer C, Holmér A, Saeed A, Fanaee-Danesh E, et al. Implications of cerebrovascular ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 (ABCG1) and apolipoprotein M in cholesterol transport at the blood-brain barrier. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1862:573–588. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Virgintino D, Errede M, Girolamo F, Capobianco C, Robertson D, Vimercati A, et al. Fetal blood-brain barrier P-glycoprotein contributes to brain protection during human development. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008;67:50–61. doi: 10.1097/nen.0b013e31815f65d9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Björkhem I, Lütjohann D, Diczfalusy U, Ståhle L, Ahlborg G, Wahren J. Cholesterol homeostasis in human brain: turnover of 24S-hydroxycholesterol and evidence for a cerebral origin of most of this oxysterol in the circulation. J Lipid Res. 1998;39:1594–1600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lütjohann D, Breuer O, Ahlborg G, Nennesmo I, Sidén A, Diczfalusy U, et al. Cholesterol homeostasis in human brain: evidence for an age-dependent flux of 24S-hydroxycholesterol from the brain into the circulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:9799–9804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kocylowski R, Dubiel M, Gudmundsson S, Fritzer E, Kiserud T, von Kaisenberg C. Hepatic aminotransferases of normal and IUGR fetuses in cord blood at birth. Early Hum Dev. 2012;88:461–465. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boehm G, Müller DM, Teichmann B, Krumbiegel P. Influence of intrauterine growth retardation on parameters of liver function in low birth weight infants. Eur J Pediatr. 1990;149:396–398. doi: 10.1007/BF02009657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sidiropoulou EJ, Paltoglou G, Valsamakis G, Margeli A, Mantzou A, Papassotiriou I, et al. Biochemistry, hormones and adipocytokines in prepubertal children born with IUGR evoke metabolic, hepatic and renal derangements. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34075-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Vergès B, Fumeron F. Potential risks associated with increased plasma plant-sterol levels. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41:76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rajaratnam RA, Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Independent association of serum squalene and noncholesterol sterols with coronary artery disease in postmenopausal women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1185–1191. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00527-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sabeva NS, McPhaul CM, Li X, Cory TJ, Feola DJ, Graf GA. Phytosterols differentially influence ABC transporter expression, cholesterol efflux and inflammatory cytokine secretion in macrophage foam cells. J Nutr Biochem. 2011;22:777–783. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pecks U, Rath W, Bauerschlag DO, Maass N, Orlikowsky T, Mohaupt MG, et al. Serum Cholesterol Acceptor Capacity in Intrauterine Growth Restricted Fetuses. J Perinat Med. 2017; accepted. DOI 10.1515/jpm-2016-0270. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52.Kelly DA. Liver complications of pediatric parenteral nutrition--epidemiology. Nutrition. 1998;14:153–157. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(97)00232-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zambrano E, El-Hennawy M, Ehrenkranz RA, Zelterman D, Reyes-Múgica M. Total parenteral nutrition induced liver pathology: an autopsy series of 24 newborn cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;7:425–432. doi: 10.1007/s10024-001-0154-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Soo JY, Wiese MD, Berry MJ, McMillen IC, Morrison JL. Intrauterine growth restriction may reduce hepatic drug metabolism in the early neonatal period. Pharmacol Res. 2018;134:68–78. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.