Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2018 Mar 26;32(6):e22435. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22435

Significant association between RGS14 rs12654812 and nephrolithiasis risk among Guangxi population in China

Jun Long 1,2, Yang Chen 1,3, Haisong Lin 1,3, Ming Liao 1,3, Tianyu Li 1,3, Lei Tong 1, Suchun Wei 1, Xiaoying Xian 1, Jia Zhu 1,3, Jianxin Chen 1,2, Jiarong Tian 1, Qiuyan Wang 1,, Zengnan Mo 1,3,
PMCID: PMC6816981  PMID: 29577426

Abstract

Background

Nephrolithiasis is a worldwide health problem that affects almost all populations. This study aimed to evaluate the association between rs12654812 of regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) gene and nephrolithiasis in the Chinese population.

Methods

A total of 1541 participators including 830 cases and 711 controls were included from Guangxi area in China. Age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, creatinine, uric acid, and urea nitrogen were analyzed between the case group and control group.

Results

We found that the G/A+A/A genotypes of rs12654812 had a significantly increased nephrolithiasis risk after adjusting age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, and hypertension, compared with G/G genotype (OR = 1.361, 95% CI = 1.033‐1.794, P = .029). This hazardous effect was more pronounced in subgroup of age < 50, ever smoking, ever drinking, creatinine normal, and high uric acid. The G/A genotype of rs12654812 also had a significantly increased nephrolithiasis risk compared with G/G genotype. The A allele of rs12654812 significantly increased the risk of nephrolithiasis compared with the G allele after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking and hypertension (OR = 1.277, 95% CI = 1.013‐1.609, P = .038).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the RGS14 polymorphism is involved in the etiology of nephrolithiasis and thus may be a genetic marker for nephrolithiasis.

Keywords: genetic marker, nephrolithiasis, regulator of G protein signaling 14, single nucleotide polymorphism, susceptibility

1. INTRODUCTION

Nephrolithiasis is a worldwide health problem that affects almost all populations. Recent studies have shown that the prevalence of nephrolithiasis in Chinese adults is 6.5%,1 while the prevalence in Guangxi province in southern China is 7.82%‐12.03%.2 Nephrolithiasis is affected by multiple risk factors, including environment, lifestyle, hormones, anatomical factors, and genetic factors. The large‐scale karst landforms, calcium‐rich soils, and high‐temperature climates may be the important factors contributing to the high prevalence of nephrolithiasis in Guangxi region.3 In addition, family history of the disease has been reported to increase the disease risk.4

Regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) is a member of the regulator of G protein signaling family. The function was mainly involved in the neurons system.5 In 2012, Urabe et al conducted a three‐stage genomewide association study, which identified the polymorphism of RGS14 gene (rs12654812) in the nephrolithiasis among the Japanese population firstly.6 Then, in 2013, Yasui et al7 confirmed the significant association. In 2015, Oddsson et al8 repeated this correlation in Icelanders. To confirm the correlation among the Chinese population, the study was conducted.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study subjects

From April 2013 to January 2016, a total of 1541 participators including 830 cases and 711 controls were recruited from Guangxi province in China. For cases, the nephrolithiasis was confirmed by various auxiliary examinations (KUB + IVP + CT + B ultrasound). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) without the essential information; and (2) currently with coronary heart disease, repeated diarrhea, thyroid disease, and dysuresia caused by the non‐stone factors. (3) So far, taking medicines that could influence lithogenesis such as glucocorticoids, calcium agent, and magnesia agent. The controls were matched with age and sex, who were confirmed to be without stones in urinary system. Meanwhile, they had a negative personal and familial history of nephrolithiasis and no long‐term use of medicines (glucocorticoids, calcium agent, magnesia argent, and diuretic). Individuals who smoked daily for more than 6 months were defined as smokers and the persons who ever drinking weekly were defined as drinkers. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Guangxi Medical University (Table 1).

Table 1.

The baseline data of nephrolithiasis and controls

Variables Case n = 830 (%) Controls n = 711 (%) P
Age (years) 48.03 ± 12.43 48.47 ± 12.10 .481
Sex .193
Male 478 (57.6) 386 (54.3)
Female 352 (42.4) 325 (45.7)
BMI 22.79 ± 3.52 23.53 ± 3.38 .000
≤24 20.85 ± 2.05 21.10 ± 1.95 .070
>24 26.76 ± 2.38 26.57 ± 2.09 .328
Hypertension
YES 118 (14.2) 74 (10.4) .024
No 712 (85.8) 637 (89.6)
Diabetes .665
YES 19 (2.3) 14 (2.0)
No 811 (97.7) 697 (98.0)
Smoking status n = 798 (%) n = 681 (%) .000
Ever 265 (33.2) 110 (16.2)
Never 533 (66.8) 571 (83.8)
Drinking status n = 790 (%) n = 431 (%) .000
Ever 310 (39.2) 236 (54.8)
Never 480 (60.8) 195 (45.2)
Crea (μmoI/L) n = 826 n = 613 .000
112.16 ± 139.14 78.99 ± 15.20
UA (μmoI/L) n = 826 n = 615 .000
349.99 ± 122.67 381.63 ± 96.44
BUN (mmol/L) n = 769 n = 114
6.04 ± 5.03 5.63 ± 7.31 .446

P < .05 are marked in bold.

2.2. Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using a DNA isolation kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The genotyping was mainly based on SNPscan method 9 (Genesky Biotechnologies Inc., Suzhou, China). Ten percent of samples from patients and controls were randomly selected to evaluate the quality of genotyping, which showed 100% concordance.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Logistic regression analysis was tested to evaluate the association between rs12654812 and nephrolithiasis. Odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI), and P value were combined to assess the power of correlation. Six covariates (i.e, age, sex, BMI, smoking status, drinking status, and hypertension status) were used to exclude potential confounding factors that influence the association. Meanwhile, other indexes were also applied to evaluate the effects of rs12654812 on renal function (UA, BUN, and Ccr). All statistical tests were two‐sided.

3. RESULTS

In the baseline analysis (Table 1), the mean age of the nephrolithiasis patients was 48.03 ± 12.43 years compared with 48.47 ± 12.10 years in controls, which showed no significant difference (P = .481). Also, the sex distributions were similar (P = .193) among the two groups. However, it suggested that BMI, the smoking status, drinking status, hypertension status, and renal function (crea and UA) were significantly different between the two groups (P < .05).

The genotype frequencies and allelic distribution of rs12654812 polymorphisms are given in Table 2. In cases, the G/G, G/A, and A/A genotypes of rs12654812 locus were 59.5%, 35.1%, and 5.4%, and the corresponding frequency was 63.2%, 30.9%, and 5.9% in the control group. We found that the G/A + A/A genotypes (OR = 1.361, 95% CI = 1.033‐1.794, P = .029) of rs12654812 had a significantly increased nephrolithiasis risk after adjusting age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, and hypertension, compared with G/G genotype. This hazardous effect was more pronounced in subgroup of age<50 (OR = 1.548, 95% CI = 1.075‐2.228, P = .019), ever smoking (OR = 1.929, 95% CI = 1.119‐3.327, P = .018), ever drinking (OR = 1.722, 95% CI = 1.146‐2.588, P = .009), creatinine normal (OR = 1.535, 95% CI = 1.130‐2.084, P = .006), and high uric acid (OR = 1.869, 95% CI = 1.024‐3.413, P = .042) (Table 3). The G/A genotype (OR = 1.360, 95% CI = 1.019‐1.816, P = .037) of rs12654812 also had a significantly increased nephrolithiasis risk compared with G/G genotype. In case group, the frequency of G and A was 77.0% and 23.0%. And the frequency of G and A was 78.6% and 21.4% in control group. There were no significant differences between case group and control group in the frequency distribution of per‐allele (P > .05), but after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, and hypertension, the A allele (OR = 1.277, 95% CI = 1.013‐1.609, P = .038) of rs12654812 significantly increased the risk of nephrolithiasis compared with the G allele.

Table 2.

Genotypes and allele frequencies of rs12654812 among cases and controls

Genotypes Case n = 830 (%) Control n = 711 (%) P values* OR (95% CI) P values**
G/G 494 (59.5) 449 (63.2) .229 Reference
G/A 291 (35.1) 220 (30.9) 1.360 (1.019‐1.816) .037
A/A 45 (5.4) 42 (5.9) 1.389 (0.743‐2.596) .303
G/A + A/A 336 (40.5) 262 (36.8) .145 1.361 (1.033‐1.794) .029
Alleles
G 1279 (77.0) 1118 (78.6) .295 Reference
A 381 (23.0) 304 (21.4) 1.277 (1.013‐1.609) .038

P < .05 are marked in bold.

P * for two‐sided chi‐squared test.

P ** adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, and hypertension in logistic regression model.

Table 3.

Stratification analyses of rs12654812 association with nephrolithiasis risk

Subgroup Case n = 830 Controls n = 711 P values OR (95% CI)
G/G G/A + A/A G/G G/A + A/A
Age (years)
<50 270 187 252 151 .019 1.548 (1.075‐2.228)
≥50 224 149 197 111 .424 1.194 (0.773‐1.846)
Sex
Male 289 189 240 146 .065 1.399 (0.979‐1.998)
Female 205 147 209 116 .131 1.420 (0.901‐2.239)
BMI n = 824 n = 616
≤24 331 223 214 128 .113 1.354 (0.930‐1.971)
>24 157 113 179 95 .077 1.451 (0.961‐2.193)
Smoking status n = 798 n = 681
Ever 151 114 76 34 .018 1.929 (1.119‐3.327)
Never 322 211 361 210 .371 1.161 (0.837‐1.610)
Drinking status n = 790 n = 431
Ever 164 146 154 82 .009 1.722 (1.146‐2.588)
Never 303 177 126 69 .631 1.100 (0.746‐1.620)
Crea (μmoI/L) n = 826 n = 613
≤106 348 249 378 212 .006 1.535 (1.130‐2.084)
>106 142 87 12 11 .159 0.428 (0.131‐1.395)
UA (μmoI/L) n = 826 n = 615
≤420 379 244 267 153 .117 1.302 (0.936‐1.812)
>420 111 92 125 70 .042 1.869 (1.024‐3.413)
BUN (mmol/L) n = 769 n = 114
≤7.14 365 249 70 39 .191 1.379 (0.852‐2.231)
>7.14 89 66 2 3 .402 0.414 (0.052‐3.267)

P < .05 are marked in bold.

P adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, drinking, and hypertension in logistic regression model (except stratified variables).

4. DISCUSSION

Nephrolithiasis was a worldwide disease influencing a larger number of populations. Recent studies had identified rs12654812 in RGS14 gene associated with nephrolithiasis in the Japanese and Icelander.6, 7, 8 Our study repeated the significant association, which suggested that rs12654812 would be a risk factor in nephrolithiasis. In addition, we found the G/A + A/A genotype carriers had a higher causative effect in subgroup of age<50, ever smoking, ever drinking, creatinine normal, and high uric acid. In the past studies, age,10 smoking consumption,11 alcohol consumption,12 and renal function 8 had been shown to play an important role in the formation of urolithiasis. Our results suggest that age, smoking consumption, alcohol consumption, creatinine, and uric acid may play a synergistic role with rs12654812 gene polymorphism and strengthen the genetic effect of nephrolithiasis.

RGS14 is a highly unusual complex family member and encodes a ~62 kDa protein most closely related to RGS12 and RGS10. The SNP rs12654812 located in RGS14 on chromosome 5q35.3, which was confirmed in strong linkage disequilibrium with multiple SNPs located in the RGS14‐SLC34A1 region.6, 7, 8 Previous studies suggest that mutations in the SLC34A1 gene were associated with renal function,13 serum phosphorus levels,7 and PTH,8 and may lead to the onset of hypophosphatemia nephrolithiasis and osteoporosis.14, 15 The SLC34A1 gene encodes NPT2a, a member of the type II sodium‐phosphate cotransporter family,16 which shows tissue‐specific gene expression in kidney.17 The NPT2a is mainly expressed in the apical membrane of renal proximal tubular epithelial cells, responsible for reclaiming most of the filtered phosphate load in a rate‐limiting manner.18, 19 The mutation of SNP rs12654812 is associated with decreased NPT2 function, resulting in a corresponding reduction in serum phosphorus levels and an increased risk of nephrolithiasis.

The studies based on NPT2‐deficient mice exhibit increased urinary excretion of phosphate (Pi), a 70%‐80% decrease in the Na/Pi cotransport and hypophosphatemia. Hypophosphatemia can increase the circulating concentration of 1, 25‐(DH) 2D and intestinal Ca hyperabsorption result from intestinal Ca channel overexpression, and ultimately lead to hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria.20, 21 In addition, parathyroid hormone, a known risk factor of nephrolithiasis, which is also at a low level due to the negative feedback of hypophosphatemia.

Our study also had several limitations. As our study was hospital‐based study design and inevitably exist a certain degree of selection bias, we applied rigorous epidemiological criterion and used statistical methods to adjust the effects of confounding factors. In addition, our sample size was limited and the sample source was mainly from China Guangxi region, the larger sample size from multicenter may help in better understanding of the role of RGS14 gene in nephrolithiasis.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The polymorphism of RGS14 gene (rs12654812) would be significantly associated with the development of Nephrolithiasis in the Chinese population. Mutation in rs12654812 may affect the adjacent SLC34A1 gene and thus affect the phosphate metabolism, eventually leading to the formation of stones. The results suggest that the RGS14 polymorphism is involved in the etiology of nephrolithiasis and thus may be a genetic marker for nephrolithiasis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The work described in this article is supported by the Innovation Research Team of Guangxi Natural Science Fund (2013GXNSFFA019002) and the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (YCBZ2017037).

Long J, Chen Y, Lin H, et al. Significant association between RGS14 rs12654812 and nephrolithiasis risk among Guangxi population in China. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32:e22435 10.1002/jcla.22435

Jun Long, Yang Chen and Haisong Lin contributed equally as first authors, Zengnan Mo and Qiuyan Wang contributed equally as corresponding authors.

Contributor Information

Qiuyan Wang, Email: 3126027880@qq.com.

Zengnan Mo, Email: zengnanmo@hotmail.com.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zeng G, Mai Z, Xia S, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in China: an ultrasonography based cross‐sectional study. BJU Int. 2017;120:109‐116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wang W, Fan J, Huang G, et al. Prevalence of kidney stones in mainland China: A systematic review. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yang Y, Deng Y, Wang Y. Major geogenic factors controlling geographical clustering of urolithiasis in China. Sci Total Environ. 2016;571:1164‐1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, et al. Family history and risk of kidney stones. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1997;8:1568‐1573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Shu F, Ramineni S, Hepler J. RGS14 is a multifunctional scaffold that integrates G protein and Ras/Raf MAPkinase signalling pathways. Cell Signal. 2010;22:366‐376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kohri K, Urabe Y, Tanikawa C, et al. A genome‐wide association study of nephrolithiasis in the Japanese population identifies novel susceptible Loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3, and 13q14.1. J Hum Genet. 2012;8:e1002541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yasui T, Okada A, Urabe Y, et al. A replication study for three nephrolithiasis loci at 5q35.3, 7p14.3 and 13q14.1 in the Japanese population. PLoS Genet. 2013;58:588‐593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Oddsson A, Sulem P, Helgason H, et al. Common and rare variants associated with kidney stones and biochemical traits. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ting JC, Ye Y, Thomas GH, et al. Analysis and visualization of chromosomal abnormalities in SNP data with SNPscan. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006;7:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Johnson CM, Wilson DM, O'Fallon WM, et al. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25‐year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int. 1979;16:624‐631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Fazlioglu A, Salman Y, Tandogdu Z, et al. The effect of smoking on spontaneous passage of distal ureteral stones. BMC Urol. 2014;14:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Karadi RV, Gadge NB, Alagawadi KR, et al. Effect of Moringa oleifera Lam. root‐wood on ethylene glycol induced urolithiasis in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;105:306‐311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Köttgen A, Pattaro C, Böger CA, et al. New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet. 2010;42:376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Rajagopal A, Braslavsky D, Lu JT, et al. Exome sequencing identifies a novel homozygous mutation in the phosphate transporter SLC34A1 in hypophosphatemia and nephrocalcinosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E2451‐E2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Prié D, Huart V, Bakouh N, et al. Nephrolithiasis and osteoporosis associated with hypophosphatemia caused by mutations in the type 2a sodium‐phosphate cotransporter. New Engl J Med. 2002;347:983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Murer H, Forster I, Biber J. The sodium phosphate cotransporter family SLC34. Pflugers Arch. 2004;447:763‐767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Oksvold P, et al. Analysis of the human tissue‐specific expression by genome‐wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody‐based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Lapointe JY, Tessier J, Paquette Y, et al. NPT2a gene variation in calcium nephrolithiasis with renal phosphate leak. Kidney Int. 2006;69:2261‐2267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Murer H, Hernando N, Forster I, et al. Proximal tubular phosphate reabsorption: molecular mechanisms. Physiol Rev. 2000;80:1373‐1409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Beck L, Karaplis AC, Amizuka N, et al. Targeted Inactivation of Npt2 in Mice Leads to Severe Renal Phosphate Wasting, Hypercalciuria, and Skeletal Abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:5372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Segawa H, Onitsuka A, Furutani J, et al. Npt2a and Npt2c in mice play distinct and synergistic roles in inorganic phosphate metabolism and skeletal development. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;297:F671‐F678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES