Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis logoLink to Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
. 2017 Mar 20;32(1):e22202. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22202

Molecular characteristics of ofloxacin mono‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from new and previously treated tuberculosis patients

Zhirui Wang 1,, Tong Xie 1, Cheng Mu 2, Chunhua Wang 2, Hanfang Ju 2, Hui Zhao 2, Rui Sun 2
PMCID: PMC6817024  PMID: 28317169

Abstract

Background

Ofloxacin (OFX) resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) isolates have been increasingly observed and are a major concern in recent years. This study investigated the genetic mutations associated with OFX resistance among clinical OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates from new and previously treated tuberculosis patients.

Methods

A total of 50 unrelated OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates were analyzed. For all isolates, the quinolone resistance determining regions of gyrA and gyrB were PCR amplified and sequenced.

Results

Single mutations in the quinolone resistance determining regions of gyrA (positions D94A, G, N, and Y; A90V; and S91P) and gyrB (positions T539A and E540D) were observed in 62% (31/50) and 4% (2/50) of all OFX mono‐resistant isolates, respectively. No differences were detected between the proportions of isolates with mutations in gyrA/gyrB from new and previously treated tuberculosis patients (P=.820).

Conclusions

Although mutations in gyrB were rare, they were as important as mutations in gyrA in predicting OFX resistance in MTB in Tianjin, China.

Keywords: Fluoroquinolone resistance, gyrA, gyrB, mutations, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, ofloxacin resistance, quinolone resistance determining region

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) remains a threat to public health and was responsible for ~9.6 million infections and an estimated 1.5 million deaths in 2014.1 The emergence and spread of drug resistant MTB isolates has worsened the WHO End TB Strategy, especially multidrug resistant MTB, which is resistant to first‐line drugs such as rifampicin and isoniazid.1, 2, 3 Ofloxacin (OFX) is a member of the fluoroquinolones (FQs), which are some of the most effective second‐line anti‐microbial drugs used to treat patients who are infected with drug resistant TB (including multidrug resistant TB) or who are intolerant of current first‐line therapy.4 However, in recent years, OFX resistant MTB isolates have been increasingly observed and are a major concern, which have exacerbated the process of treating and controlling TB.5

Molecular methods for the rapid detection of mutations in genes associated with drug resistance are faster than automatic liquid culture systems that require 7‐10 days to complete.2, 6, 7 The main cellular target for FQs is DNA gyrase encoded by gyrA and gyrB,5 in which the mutations in quinolone resistance determining regions (QRDRs) have been associated with FQ resistance.8 Efflux pumps also confer FQ resistance, which is able to be induced by anti‐tuberculosis drug such as rifampicin.9 Understanding the mainly genetic background of resistance to FQs in MTB is essential, especially in FQ mono‐resistant MTB.

In this study, we sought to investigate the genetic mutations in the QRDRs of gyrA and gyrB among clinical MTB isolates with OFX mono‐resistance from new and previously treated patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains

A total of 2639 MTB isolates were collected by the Tianjin drug‐resistance tuberculosis surveillance program from Jan 2013 to Dec 2015. Identification of isolates was performed on Lowenstein‐Jensen medium containing p‐Nitrobenzoic‐acid (PNB) and Thiophene‐2‐ carboxylic hydrazide (TCH).

2.2. Drug susceptibility test

According to the proportion method recommended by WHO, drug susceptibility tests (DSTs) were performed on Lowenstein‐Jensen medium containing streptomycin (4 mg/L), rifampicin (40 mg/L), isoniazid (0.2 mg/L), ethambutol (2 mg/L), OFX (2 mg/L), or kanamycin (30 mg/L), at the Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory of Tianjin Center for Tuberculosis Control.10

2.3. Patient information

The demographic and clinical information of enrolled patients, including gender, age, and TB treatment history, was obtained from the patients’ records.

2.4. DNA sequencing of gyrA and gyrB genes

DNA was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method, and samples were stored at −20°C. Primers used to amplify and sequence the QRDR of gyrA and gyrB from MTB isolates were described previously 11 and include GYRA‐F: ATCGACTATGCGATGAGCG, GYRA‐R: GGGCTTCGGTGTACCTCAT, GYRB‐F: AGTCGTTGTGAACAAGGCTGT, and GYRB‐R: CCACTTGAGTTTGTACAGCGG. PCR products were sequenced by Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Beijing, China). Sequence data was analyzed using the MUBII‐TB‐DB database and BLAST on http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, using the MTB H37Rv genome as a reference (GenBank accession number: CP003248.2).12

2.5. Statistical analysis

A χ2 test in IBM SPSS Statistics 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to compare the proportions of drug resistance mutations in gyrA and gyrB between isolates from new and previously treated TB patients. P values of <.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ information

By proportion method, 50 of 2639 isolates were OFX mono‐resistant MTB, excluding six repeated OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates. Each of the 50 OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates obtained in this study were collected separately from 50 unrelated pulmonary TB patients (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of mutations in gyrA/gyrB among 50 OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates from patients

Patient number Treatment history Gender Age Mutations in gyrA/gyrB in isolates from patients
gyrA gyrB
13005 New Male 34 D94N WT
13137 New Female 50 D94G WT
13139 New Male 60 S91P WT
13245 New Male 50 D94N WT
13497 New Female 78 S91P WT
13523 New Male 69 D94G WT
13634 New Male 57 A90V WT
14015 New Male 44 D94A WT
14036 Previously treated Male 28 D94G WT
14044 New Female 54 A90V WT
14095 New Male 33 D94N WT
14179 Previously treated Male 30 S91P WT
14374 New Female 38 D94N WT
14399 New Female 29 D94N WT
14448 New Male 31 D94A WT
14466 New Male 51 D94N WT
14476 New Male 45 A90V WT
14603 New Male 22 A90V WT
14823 New Female 57 D94A WT
14824 New Male 58 D94A WT
14871 New Male 27 D94A WT
15043 New Female 38 D94N WT
15151 New Male 82 S91P WT
15177 New Female 31 D94G WT
15182 New Male 74 A90V WT
15196 New Female 25 D94A WT
15214 New Male 67 S91P WT
15219 New Male 44 D94Y WT
15426 Previously treated Male 89 D94G WT
15457 New Male 56 D94Y WT
15786 Previously treated Male 54 D94G WT
15369 New Male 55 WT T539A
15539 Previously treated Female 81 WT E540D
13051 New Male 61 WT WT
13356 New Male 83 WT WT
13422 New Male 26 WT WT
13520 Previously treated Male 45 WT WT
13639 New Male 56 WT WT
13659 New Male 66 WT WT
14096 New Female 60 WT WT
14119 New Male 74 WT WT
14436 New Male 55 WT WT
14739 New Female 28 WT WT
14867 New Male 71 WT WT
15134 Previously treated Male 41 WT WT
15297 New Male 55 WT WT
15404 New Male 28 WT WT
15470 Previously treated Male 53 WT WT
15489 New Female 29 WT WT
15670 New Male 62 WT WT

WT, wild type.

3.2. Mutations in gyrA and gyrB genes among MTB strains

As shown in Table 1% (31/50) isolates carried single mutations in the QRDR of gyrA. The most frequent mutations in gyrA were at positions D94N (n=7), A (n=6), G (n=6), and Y (n=2), followed by A90V (n=5) and S91P (n=5). Of all MTB isolates, 4% (2/50) isolates carried single mutations in the QRDR of gyrB, at positions T539A and E540D, based on the findings of Pantel et al.13 All strains carried S95T mutations in gyrA and are not listed in Table 1 because they only showed these specific polymorphisms.6

No differences were detected between the proportions of isolates having mutations in gyrA/gyrB from new (66.7%, 28/42) and previously treated TB patients (62.5%, 5/8), P=.820. No differences were detected between the proportions of isolates with mutations in gyrA/gyrB from male (63.9%, 23/36) and female TB patients (71.4%, 10/14), P=.863.

4. Discussion

In this study, the most common mutations in gyrA were found in the QRDR at positions 94, 90, and 91, carried by 62% OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates, which was in agreement with the previously findings from literatures.5, 14 To our knowledge, this is the first report to show that the mutations T539A and E540D in the QRDR in gyrB were found from OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates in China. These mutations in gyrA and gyrB partially accounted for the phenotypic OFX resistance. Other mechanisms of FQ resistance, such as efflux pumps, should be evaluated to improve the prediction of FQ resistance phenotypes.15

All OFX mono‐resistant MTB isolates were obtained from both new (42 cases) and previously treated TB patients (eight cases). Our results implied that the transmission of isolates that were already resistant to FQs causes the prevalence of FQ resistance and that MTB in TB patients acquires FQ resistance correlated with the patient's previous exposure to FQs.16 However, no difference was detected between the proportions of isolates with mutations in gyrA/gyrB from new and previously treated TB patients (P=.820). A limitation was that only a small number of MTB isolates that had mutations in gyrA/gyrB were collected, excluding other OFX resistant MTB isolates.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, mutations in QRDR in both gyrA and gyrB were important in predicting OFX resistance of MTB isolates in Tianjin, China. Further research using additional OFX resistant MTB isolates to acquire and analyze the prevalence of OFX genotypic resistance of MTB isolates in this region is needed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Grant number: CDCKY1503).

Wang Z, Xie T, Mu C, et al. Molecular characteristics of ofloxacin mono‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from new and previously treated tuberculosis patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32:e22202 10.1002/jcla.22202

References

  • 1. World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report. 2015.
  • 2. Brossier F, Guindo D, Pham A, et al. Performance of the new version (v2.0) of the geno type MTBDRsl test for detection of resistance to second‐line drugs in multidrug‐ resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1573‐1580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cohen KA, Abeel T, Manson McGuire A, et al. Evolution of extensively drug‐resistant tuberculosis over four decades: whole genome sequencing and dating analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from KwaZulu‐Natal. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Blumberg HM, Burman WJ, Chaisson RE, et al. American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America: treatment of tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:603‐662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bernard C, Veziris N, Brossier F, et al. Molecular diagnosis of fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:1519‐1524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Avalos E, Catanzaro D, Catanzaro A, et al. Frequency and geographic distribution of gyrA and gyrB mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Moure R, Tudó G, Medina R, et al. Detection of streptomycin and quinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a low‐density DNA array. Tuberculosis. 2013;93:508‐514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Malik S, Willby M, Sikes D, et al. New insights into fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: functional genetic analysis of gyrA and gyrB mutations. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Louw GE, Warren RM, Gey van Pittius NC, et al. Rifampicin reduces susceptibility to ofloxacin in rifampicin‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis through efflux. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:269‐276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. World Health Organization . Policy guidance on drug‐susceptibility testing (DST) of second‐line anti‐tuberculosis drugs. 2008. [PubMed]
  • 11. Kontsevaya I, Mironova S, Nikolayevskyy V, et al. Evaluation of two molecular assays for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to fluoroquinolones in high‐tuberculosis and multidrug resistance settings. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2832‐2837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Flandrois JP, Lina G, Dumitrescu O. MUBII‐TB‐DB: a database of mutations associated with antibiotic resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis . BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15:107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pantel A, Petrella S, Veziris N, et al. Extending the definition of the GyrB quinolone resistance‐determining region in Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA gyrase for assessing fluoroquinolone resistance in M. tuberculosis . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:1990‐1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhao LL, Sun Q, Zeng CY, et al. Molecular characterisation of extensively drug‐resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45:137‐143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Singh M, Jadaun GP, Ramdas Srivastava K, et al. Effect of efflux pump inhibitors on drug susceptibility of ofloxacin resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Indian J Med Res. 2011;133:535‐540. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang JY, Lee LN, Lai HC, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates: associated genetic mutations and relationship to antimicrobial exposure. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59:860‐865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES