Skip to main content
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 2019 Sep 16;117(8):1514–1523. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.09.007

Electric-Induced Reversal of Morphogenesis in Hydra

Erez Braun 1,2,, Hillel Ori 2,3
PMCID: PMC6817546  PMID: 31570230

Abstract

Morphogenesis involves the dynamic interplay of biochemical, mechanical, and electrical processes. Here, we ask to what extent can the course of morphogenesis be modulated and controlled by an external electric field? We show that at a critical amplitude, an external electric field can halt morphogenesis in Hydra regeneration. Moreover, above this critical amplitude, the electric field can lead to reversal dynamics: a fully developed Hydra folds back into its incipient spheroid morphology. The potential to renew morphogenesis is reexposed when the field is reduced back to amplitudes below criticality. These dynamics are accompanied by modulations of the Wnt3 activity, a central component of the head organizer in Hydra. The controlled backward-forward cycle of morphogenesis can be repeated several times, showing that the reversal trajectory maintains the integrity of the tissue and its regeneration capability. Each cycle of morphogenesis leads to a newly emerged body plan in the redeveloped folded tissue, which is not necessarily similar to the one before the reversal process. Reversal of morphogenesis is shown to be triggered by enhanced electrical excitations in the Hydra tissue, leading to intensified calcium activity. Folding back of the body-plan morphology together with the decay of a central biosignaling system, indicate that electrical processes are tightly integrated with biochemical and mechanical-structural processes in morphogenesis and play an instructive role to a level that can direct developmental trajectories. Reversal of morphogenesis by external fields calls for extending its framework beyond program-like, forward-driven, hierarchical processes based on reaction diffusion and positional information.

Significance

Morphogenesis, the emergence of a body plan in animal development, is one of the most fundamental processes in living systems. Is it possible to modulate morphogenesis and alter the developmental trajectory in a controlled manner? These questions remain open. We show that an external electric field above a critical amplitude can halt and even reverse the course of morphogenesis in whole-body Hydra regeneration on demand. The reversal trajectory maintains the integrity of the tissue and its regeneration capability. We further show that these reversal dynamics are induced by enhanced electrical excitations of the tissue. It demonstrates that electrical processes play an instructive role in morphogenesis to a level that can direct developmental trajectories, commonly thought to be forward-driven programmed biochemical processes.

Introduction

Morphogenesis results from the dynamic interplay of three types of processes: biochemical (1, 2, 3), mechanical (2, 4) and electrical (5, 6, 7), spanning all scales from the molecular to the entire organism (8, 9). The robustness of the morphogenetic process is typically attributed to the presence of a well-defined hierarchy of forward-driven processes, which lead to the emergence of a viable organism in a program-like manner (10). The nature of the underlying mechanisms, such as threshold-crossing cellular processes and the development of symmetry-breaking fields, is considered as the source of stability of the emerging body plan. Yet, at the level of a cell, it has become clear that cellular differentiation, once considered to be highly stable and robust, can in fact be modulated and directly reprogrammed on demand (11). Is it possible to “reprogram” an entire multicellular organism? Is it possible to modulate the course of morphogenesis in a whole animal and alter its developmental trajectory in a controlled manner? Currently, these questions remain open, and there are no known examples of controlled reprogramming at the level of a whole organism.

Direct modulation of the course of morphogenesis in a nondestructive way is an outstanding challenge. The implementation of such a control sets stringent demands on the system; the external control must be strong enough to induce a severe perturbation, yet the system has to maintain tight coordination of the underlying biochemical, mechanical, and electrical processes and retains its viability. The ability to modulate morphogenesis on demand will provide novel insights into the process of morphogenesis as well as advance practical applications in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. We sought to utilize external electric fields, which can be exquisitely controlled and manipulated experimentally, to modulate the course of development in Hydra regeneration. Here, we demonstrate that whole-body morphogenesis can indeed be controlled and even reversed by the utilization of an external alternating current (AC) electric field.

Historically, studies of morphogenesis concentrated mainly on biochemical patterning by processes of reaction diffusion and cell differentiation due to positional information (1). The concept that developmental trajectories are determined in a program-like manner was established under the view that biochemical patterning plays a leading role in the dynamics. It is becoming evident that mechanical and electrical processes can also have a central role in morphogenesis. The idea that mechanical processes are important goes back to the seminal work of D'Arcy Thompson (12). More recently, with the advance of technological capabilities, experimental efforts have started to shed light on the coupling between mechanics and biosignaling during morphogenesis, showing multidirectional cross talks between these two types of processes (13).

Electrical processes also play important roles in morphogenesis; it has been demonstrated that endogenous voltage gradients drive wound healing in animals (including humans) and plants (14, 15). The electrical processes in cells, even those that are not electrically excitable, seem to play a regulatory role and are integrated during embryogenesis with the biochemical signals (7, 16, 17, 18). The connection between bioelectric processes and other processes leading to cell proliferation, motility, and apoptosis in morphogenesis during development and cancer is beginning to be elucidated (7, 14, 19).

Perturbing the nonneural bioelectric signals in embryogenesis and regeneration can be utilized by drugs affecting the underlying molecular machinery (e.g., gap junctions and ion channels). Using these methods, it has been shown that electrical processes regulate gene expression and participate in organ morphogenesis as well as in patterning the body plan at different levels in various developmental and regeneration model systems. Modulations of these electrical processes lead to modifications in patterning and ectopic structure formation. For example, manipulation of specific ion channels in frogs induces eye formation in many different tissues, such as the gut and the tail (7). Altering the electrical properties of the tissue in Planaria regeneration, causes dramatic modifications in morphogenesis by affecting polarity and leading to the emergence of animals with multiple heads. Temporary reduction of the bioelectric connectivity in Planaria tissue during regeneration also induces head formation of different morphologies (see recent reviews summarizing these phenomena (5, 7, 20)).

Attempts to elucidate the role of electrical processes in development also involved the utilization of external electric fields. These attempts have a rich history going back to Roux (21), who applied external electric fields to developing eggs already in the 19th century. More recently, applications of external electric fields showed that different cell types respond to the external field in a positional-sensitive manner, leading to directional cell migration and cell proliferation affecting morphogenesis (14). In animals, it has been demonstrated that the application of electric fields leads to regeneration of limb form, including muscle, nerve, and cartilage in amputated forelimbs of animals, which do not normally regenerate them, such as Xenopus and rats (14). External electric fields were also utilized to demonstrate that they can affect the polarity of the body axis via directing charged morphogens (22).

Regeneration of a whole animal from a tissue segment provides a powerful model to study morphogenesis due to its flexibility, allowing to apply a wide range of experimental manipulations. Regeneration processes are closely related and utilize similar molecular components to embryogenesis, so studies of these different developmental processes complement each other (13, 23).

Among models of whole-body regeneration, Hydra, a freshwater animal, stands out in its remarkable regeneration capabilities (24). Hydra played a crucial role in the history of experimental biology thanks to the studies of Abraham Trembley in the 18th century, who discovered regeneration and demonstrated that bisected Hydra can regenerate a head or a foot according to their original polarity (25, 26). It was later shown that even small excised tissue segments or condensed aggregates formed from a mixture of dissociated cells regenerate into complete animals within a couple of days (24, 27). Hydra can achieve proper morphology after regeneration, with epithelial cells alone (13, 28). A tissue segment first goes through an essential stage in which it forms a hollow spheroid made of a bilayer of epithelial cells; this spheroid eventually regenerates into the body of a mature Hydra (29, 30, 31). The regeneration process mostly involves cell reorganization and differentiation, whereas cell division is not essential (24, 28, 32). Thus, the number of cells and the size of regenerated Hydra depend on the original tissue size.

Hydra also possesses outstanding electrical properties, making it a natural model system to study the effect of external electric fields on morphogenesis. Practically, all cells in Hydra are electrically excitable, and the epithelial tissues are capable of generating and propagating electrical action potentials (33, 34, 35, 36). This implies that the outer epithelium layer does not present a passive barrier to external electrical perturbations; even relatively weak external electric fields can trigger strong internal effects because of the nonlinear amplification by the generation of excitable electrical spikes in the tissue and can thus trigger strong effects.

Here, we show that an external electric field can be tuned to halt the process of morphogenesis in a nondestructive way in Hydra regeneration. Moreover, the external electric field can be further adjusted to drive morphogenesis backward and forward, around a critical point in a controlled manner. To the best of our knowledge, such a remarkable level of control on the course of morphogenesis by an external field has never been demonstrated before. In particular, a backward-forward cycle of morphogenesis leads to a newly emerged body plan in the redeveloped folded tissue, which is not necessarily similar to the one before the reversal process. Thus, a controlled drive of morphogenesis allows, in principle, multiple reinitiations of novel developmental trajectories for the same tissue.

We show that the above phenomena are mediated by enhanced electrical excitations accompanied by intensified calcium dynamics in the epithelium tissue. Thus, the external electric field stimulates a response that is amplified by the excitable machinery of the Hydra tissue showing that electrical processes play an instructive role in morphogenesis. We further show that the expression level of Wnt3, a central signaling component in Hydra, is modulated to first decay and then turned on, respectively, with the cycle of backward and forward morphogenesis controlled by the external field. These observations demonstrate the tight coordination of the biochemical and mechanical processes with the electrical ones, ensuring the integrity of the tissue and its regeneration capability as morphogenesis is folded back.

Materials and Methods

Hydra strains, culture, and sample preparation

Experiments are carried out with two transgenic strains of Hydra vulgaris (AEP): a HyWnt3:GFP-HyAct:dsRED transgenic strain (a generous gift from B. Galliot, University of Geneva (37) utilizing the hoTG-HyWnt3FL-EGFP-HyAct:dsRED plasmid from T. Holstein, Heidelberg (38)); and a transgenic line with a GCaMP6s probe for Ca2+, generated by us in the Kiel center (39), using a modified version of the pHyVec1 plasmid, which replaces the GFP sequence with a GCaMP6s sequence that was codon optimized for Hydra (HyGCaMP6s was a gift from the R. Yuste lab (Addgene plasmid #102558; http://www.addgene.org/102558/; Resource Report identification: Addgene_102558) (40)). The embryos were grown and propagated for a few weeks. We selected Hydra expressing GCaMP6s in their epithelium cells and propagated them until a stable signal covering the entire animal emerged throughout the population. The reversal of morphogenesis phenomenon is found to be similar for both strains. Animals are cultivated in Hydra culture medium (1 mM NaHCO3, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM KCl, 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.7)) at 18°C. The animals are fed every other day with live Artemia nauplii and washed after ∼4 h. Experiments are initiated ∼24 h after feeding.

Tissue segments are excised from the middle of a mature Hydra using a scalpel equipped with a no. 15 blade. To obtain fragments, a ring is cut into ∼4 parts by additional longitudinal cuts. Fragments are incubated in a dish for ∼3 h to allow their folding into spheroids before transferring them into the experimental sample holder. Regeneration is defined as the appearance of tentacles, and the regeneration time is defined as the time interval between excision and the appearance of the first tentacle.

Sample holder

Spheroid tissues are placed within wells of ∼1.3 mm diameter made in a strip of 2% agarose gel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to keep the regenerating Hydra in place during time-lapse imaging. The tissue spheroid, typically of a few hundred microns in size, is free to move within the well. The agarose strip containing 12–13 wells is fixed on a transparent plexiglass bar of 1 mm height, anchored on a Teflon holder within a 55 mm petri dish. Two platinum mesh electrodes (Platinum gauze 52 mesh, 0.1 mm diameter wire; Alfa Aesar, Lancashire, United Kingdom) are stretched and fixed by 2% agarose gel at the two sides of the plexiglass bar with 7 mm distance, leaving two channels for fluid flow between the electrodes and the samples. The mesh electrodes cover the entire length of the sample holder, and their height ensures full coverage of the samples. A peristaltic pump (IPC; Ismatec, Wertheim, Germany) flows the medium continuously from an external reservoir (replaced at least once every 24 h) at a rate of 170 mL/h into each of the channels between the electrodes and the samples. The medium covers the entire preparation, and the volume in the bath is kept fixed throughout the experiments by pumping medium out from three holes that determine the height of the fluid. The continuous medium flow ensures stable environmental conditions, and the fixed volume of medium in the bath ensures constant conductivity between the electrodes. All the experiments are done at room temperature.

AC generators

An AC generator (PM5138A; Fluke, Everett, WA, or a waveform generator 33621A (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) connected to a voltage amplifier A-303 (A.A. Lab Systems, Kennett Square, PA) for voltages above 40 Vpp) is used to set the voltage between the electrodes. The generator is connected directly to one of the electrodes and via a current multimeter (34401A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) to the second one, allowing us to monitor the current in the system throughout the experiment. The measured current is around 4 mA for applied 10 Vpp, and the conductivity is found to be linear with the increase of applied voltage throughout the experiment. The connection to the platinum electrodes is made by sintering 0.4-mm-wide platinum wires (Alfa Aesar) to the mesh electrodes, allowing connections to the external devices with only Pt in contact with the medium.

Microscopy

Time-lapse bright-field and fluorescence images are acquired by a Zeiss Axio Observer microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with a 5× air objective (NA = 0.25) and a 1.6× Optovar with a CCD camera (Zyla 5.5 sCMOS; Andor, Belfast, Northern Ireland). Ca2+ fluorescence activity was measured on 696 × 520 pixels images, by averaging the fluorescence signal over the entire tissue. The Ca2+ traces shown in this work depict the fluorescence density (fluorescence per unit area) averaged over the tissue relative to the background, measured by averaging the fluorescence over a window similar in size to the tissue size and located outside of the tissue sample. The Wnt3-GFP fluorescence signal was extracted from the full resolution images of 1392 × 1040 pixels by measuring the fluorescence density around the center of the GFP signal at the tip, relative to the fluorescence density in the background tissue, measured in a window covering a sizeable part of the tissue sample near the tip. The sample holder is placed on a movable stage (Märzhäuser Wetzlar, Wetzlar, Germany), and the entire microscopy system is operated by Micromanager, recording images at 1 min intervals. Setting the fluorescence recordings at 1 min resolution is done to prevent tissue damage throughout the experiments.

Electrophysiology

Tissue fragments before folding or tissue spheroids after folding are immersed in 2% low-melting agarose (Sigma-Aldrich) covered with a standard medium, placed within a 90 mm petri dish. The measurements are done under a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Observer), allowing simultaneous fluorescence and electrical measurements. All electrophysiological measurements are done in the absence of external electric fields. Microelectrodes are fabricated by AgCl-coated silver wires, threaded in borosilicate glass capillaries with microfilament (1.5 mm outside diameter and 0.86 mm inside diameter; A-M Systems, Sequim, WA). Capillaries are pulled (vertical puller; Narishige International, Amityville, NY), broken at the extreme tip, and filled with a standard medium solution. A reference electrode made of a thick AgCl-coated silver wire is immersed in the dish. The microelectrode is placed on a manipulator and allowed to penetrate the tissue until a stable resting potential is measured. Voltage is measured using Axon Instruments Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA), and measurements are inspected by an oscilloscope, as well as digitally acquired at 1000 Hz frequency by National Instruments PCI-6259 acquisition card (National Instruments, Austin, TX). Time-lapse imaging is done at 1 min intervals in bright-field and fluorescence channels allowing imaging of the tissue and recording of the Ca2+ activity. To extract the recorded spike train, the voltage trace is smoothed (0.1 s window), and the smoothed trace is subtracted from the original voltage trace. The filtered trace is magnified to emphasize the spikes. The Ca2+ activity recorded by the time-lapse fluorescence signal is extracted from each frame within a circle smaller than the tissue segment to avoid edge effects. The Ca2+ signal is synchronized with the electrical recording with accuracy less than 3 s (note that the fluorescence recording is at 1 min resolution).

Results

Morphology dynamics

We place small Hydra tissue segments, excised from an adult animal after their folding into spheroids, between a pair of platinum mesh electrodes and study the regeneration dynamics under applied electric fields (Materials and Methods). In the absence of external electric fields, Hydra regenerate from incipient tissue spheroids into mature animals within 15–55 h (31). We find that the regeneration trajectory is significantly affected by the application of an external electric field (Fig. 1). The application of an AC voltage above a critical amplitude of ∼20–30 Vpp (Volts peak to peak) at 1 kHz frequency halts regeneration, and the tissue does not develop (Figs. 1, a and b and S1). The suspended tissue maintains its regeneration potential as proved by the resumption of morphogenesis upon the reduction of the external voltage below the critical value (Figs. 1 b and S1). When the voltage is increased above the critical value after the regeneration process concluded, a fully developed Hydra gradually shrinks its tentacles and eventually folds back its mature body plan into the incipient morphology of a spheroid (Figs. 1 c and S2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Halt and reversal of morphogenesis under external electric fields. (a) Possible trajectories for an incipient spheroid tissue under a field are shown. (b) Shown are images depicting the trajectory scheme in (a) top row: time (hour from tissue excising) and voltages (Vpp) for the images (from left): 5.5, 0; 42, 18; 68, 25.5; 97, 0. The red arrow represents the voltage is on, the black arrow represents V = 0. The voltage is switched off at 71 h. Scale bars, 100 μm. (c) Shown are images depicting the trajectory scheme in (a) bottom row: time (hour from tissue excising) and voltages (Vpp) for the images (from left): 2, 0; 53, 0; 80, 25; 108, 31; 136, 0. The voltage is switched off at 108 h. The red arrow represents the voltage is on, the black arrow represents V = 0. Scale bars, 100 μm. (d) Cumulative statistics for regeneration and reversal of morphogenesis are shown. The left panel shows cumulative statistics (147 tissue samples from 15 different experiments) exhibiting their first regeneration in the absence of an external voltage or a voltage below the critical value. Time is measured from the point of tissue excision, and regeneration is identified as the emergence of tentacles. All samples regenerated between 15 and 55 h, in agreement with previous results (31). The right panel shows cumulative statistics for reversal of morphogenesis, the folding back of fully regenerated Hydra into the incipient spheroid morphology, for 77 tissue samples (from 15 different experiments). All samples first regenerated into a mature Hydra. The folding time is estimated from the point at which the voltage was first set above 15 Vpp, the minimal voltage observed to affect morphology (e.g., shortening of the tentacles).

The reversal of morphogenesis is gradual and can be controlled by the external voltage; however, different tissues exhibit different critical voltages. This imposes a practical challenge to precisely controlling the morphogenesis trajectory because of the individual sensitivity of each tissue to the applied voltage. When the voltage increase is gradual and carefully controlled near the critical value, the tissue maintains its integrity as well as its regeneration capacity for repeated cycles of backward-forward morphogenesis (Video S1). This reversal of morphogenesis is reproducible and robust as summarized in the cumulative distributions of Fig. 1 d. Below the critical voltage (blue curve, left) regeneration (defined by the emergence of clearly observable tentacles) emerges for all samples in less than ∼55 h (147 tissue samples from 15 different experiments). At voltages above criticality, the probability to observe tentacles in the back-folding samples diminishes within a wide range of timescales and is practically zero above ∼90 h. All 77 tissue samples showing reversal of morphogenesis (from 15 different experiments) in Fig. 1 d (red curve, right) first regenerate into mature animals and then fold back upon the increase of the external voltage.

Video S1. Reversal of Morphogenesis

Bright-field microscopy video of a tissue spheroid regenerating into a mature Hydra and then folding back its morphology under an electric field. The reversed tissue regenerates again upon the reduction of the external voltage to zero. A second round of reversal of morphogenesis then follows. Note the differences in the critical voltages required for reversal of morphogenesis for the first and second rounds; the voltage range in the first round is 20-30 V while in the second round is 30-40 V. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (18.3MB, mp4)

Renewed morphogenesis upon the reduction of the applied voltage may lead to a different morphology from the one in the previous cycle manifested by a different body form or a different number of tentacles and their shape (Fig. S2). This is indicative that the folding back of the morphology involves significant modulations of the tissue organization. When the cycle of controlled backward-forward morphogenesis is repeated a few times, the subsequent cycle of backward folding requires a higher voltage to reverse morphogenesis than the previous one (see examples in Figs. 4 a and S2). This increase in the critical voltage points to an interesting adaptation of the tissue.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Enhanced electrical excitability of the tissue triggering reversal of morphogenesis. (a) Ca2+ fluorescence density for V = 0 (first trace) and 20–26.5 Vpp at 1 kHz (second trace) are shown. Bright-field images (at end point of each corresponding trace) are shown. Scale bars, 100 μm. The third trace recorded at 26.5 Vpp, 3 kHz, showing resumption of a fully regenerated Hydra. Repeated frequency switching is shown (1 kHz at the same voltage (26.5 Vpp; fourth trace)). Increased voltage (33 Vpp, arrow) leads to reversal of morphogenesis. A second frequency switch to 3 kHz shows again a reduction in Ca2+ activity (fifth trace) and resumption of regenerated Hydra. (b) Normalized fluorescence density distributions comparing V = 0 (blue), high voltage at 1 kHz (red), and 3 kHz (black) are shown. Each curve summarizes two tissue samples, with >3000 measured points at 1 min resolution. It shows similar distributions for high voltage at 3 kHz and V = 0, and an enhanced tail for high voltage at 1 kHz. Note the y-axis logarithmic scale. (c) Ca2+ fluorescence density for 0.1 mM (normal medium; upper trace) and 1 mM (lower trace) K+ medium in the absence of an external field are shown. Attached bright-field images at the end point of the corresponding trace are shown. Scale bars, 100 μm. (d) Ca2+ fluorescence density distributions for 1 mM (red) and 0.1 mM (blue) K+ (2 tissue samples; ∼4000 measurement points for each curve) are shown. Note the y-axis logarithmic scale. All Ca2+ signals shown are measurements of the fluorescence density of the entire tissue relative to the average fluorescence level in the background, estimated from time-lapse imaging at 1 min intervals. (e) An example of a direct measurement of the spontaneous (no external field) electrical potential by an AgCl-coated silver electrode is shown. Each spontaneously arising Ca2+ spike (yellow) is stimulated by a preburst of action potentials (blue; Materials and Methods). Overall, we measured 174 Ca2+ spikes in tissue fragments with only 7 among them with no clear burst of electrical spikes (see Fig. S7, a and b for more examples and voltage traces).

Biosignaling dynamics

Does reversal morphogenesis have any signature in the underlying biological processes beyond the observed change in morphology? We utilize a transgenic Hydra expressing a GFP probe under the control of the Wnt3 promoter (37, 38). Wnt3 is a component of the canonical Wnt pathway, which has been shown to be key in patterning the body plan in many organisms, including Hydra (38, 41). Wnt3 has been shown to be a critical component of the Hydra head organizer, which is a well-defined group of cells. Wnt3 is continuously maintained active by an autoregulatory transcriptional system (38) and plays an important role in preserving the integrity of the body plan in face of continuous replacement of tissues in a developmental process that never ceases (42). The Wnt3 signal is thus a relevant marker for the underlying biological state of the tissue in morphogenesis.

We find that the Wnt3-activity fluorescence signal at the tip of the head (hypostome) in mature Hydra (38, 41), gradually decays after the external voltage is increased above criticality, marking the decay of the head organizer activity as the tissue folds back into an incipient spheroid (Figs. 2 and S3). The Wnt3 activity is estimated from time-lapse microscopy, measuring the fluorescence density in a small area around the GFP signal at the head, normalized by the average fluorescence density of the tissue outside this region. The Wnt3 signal reemerges upon a second round of regeneration after a switch of the external voltage back to zero (Figs. 2 and S3; Video S2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The decay of Wnt3 activity upon reversal of morphogenesis. Transgenic Hydra expressing a GFP probe under the control of the Wnt3 promoter (37, 38), imaged at 1 min intervals by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, are utilized. (a) Shown is an example trace of the Wnt3 activity from a tissue sample at different time points (measured from the tissue excision time), estimated from the average fluorescence density of the GFP signal in a small region around the center of the signal, relative to the average GFP signal in the background tissue. The curve measures the trajectory of the Wnt3-activity decay as the voltage is increased (Vpp marked in red) and its recovery upon the renewal of regeneration. The tissue first regenerated into a mature Hydra in the absence of an external field, expressing a clear GFP signal at the head organizer in the tip of the head (hypostome). An external field above the critical voltage leads to reversal of morphogenesis and the decay of the Wnt3 signal (time points marked 1–5). Resumption of regeneration leading to a mature Hydra and the reemergence of the Wnt3 signal after the voltage is switched off (time points marked 6–8) are shown. The inset shows the mean GFP fluorescence level marking the Wnt3 activity, averaged from seven tissue samples (the one in the main figure plus the other six shown in Fig. S3; from five different experiments). The different curves are first shifted to time zero at the peak of the signal, then interpolated to give the same sampling and averaged. The Wnt3 signal monotonically decays with time. The shadow around the curve marks the standard errors estimated from these measurements. (b) Fluorescence images of the GFP channel (upper row) and the corresponding bright-field images (lower row) at time points marked in (a) are shown. Scale bars, 100 μm.

Video S2. Decay of Wnt3 during Reversal of Morphogenesis

The same sample as in Video S1 is observed under a fluorescence microscope for GFP (left) and RFP (right). The GFP is under the Wnt3 promoter and the RFP is under the control of the ubiquitous Hydra actin promoter and serves as a fluorescence reference. The video shows the two rounds of reversal of morphogenesis as in Video S1. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (12.7MB, mp4)

Overall, we analyzed in detail seven tissue samples (from five different experiments) of fully regenerated Hydra, reversing their morphology together with the decay of the Wnt3-activity fluorescence signal (Figs. 2 and S3). The inset to Fig. 2 shows that the mean Wnt3 activity decays as a function of time at external voltages above the critical values, measured from the GFP fluorescence density levels averaged over these seven tissue samples. Because the critical voltage and correspondingly the experimental protocol of the applied voltage is different for each sample, the fluorescence trace was first shifted to zero time at the peak of the fluorescence signal and then interpolated to give a uniform sampling coverage for all traces before averaging. As shown by the shaded area around the curve, the standard error of this averaging is small. Thus, the significant Wnt3 decay observed is a direct response of the biosignaling system to the external voltage. Note that this decay of the fluorescence signal indeed marks the decay of the Wnt3 activity because the latter is transcriptionally controlled by its autocatalytic activity (38).

Calcium dynamics and electrical processes

To gain insight into the mechanism of reversible morphogenesis, we turn to study the effect of the external field on calcium dynamics. Calcium is a natural candidate because it is a universal effector across biological systems and an important mediator between electrical, mechanical, and biochemical processes (13). Toward this end, we constructed a transgenic Hydra expressing a fast Ca2+ fluorescence probe in its epithelial cells (36, 40) (Materials and Methods). Tissue fragments excised from these transgenic Hydra are placed in the experimental setup after folding into spheroids, and time-lapse videos at 1 min intervals are recorded. The 1 min time resolution enables a measurement of the entire regeneration process, possibly for more than one cycle of backward-forward morphogenesis, over days without significant damage to the tissue. Although higher temporal resolution measurements could reveal information on the Ca2+ kinetics (36), the minute resolution enables measurement of the average modulations of the Ca2+ activity under the external field for extended periods.

Altogether, we studied 9 tissue samples (from 3 different experiments) and collected more than 10,000 measurement points to uncover Ca2+ dynamics in regeneration under modulated electric fields. Individual examples and cohort statistics are shown in Fig. 3. In the absence of external electric fields, the tissue initially exhibits local excitations of the Ca2+ signals at different parts, which eventually become coordinated into whole-tissue coherent spikes (examples in Fig. 3, a and b). Elevated external voltage (>15 Vpp, 1 kHz) leads to a significant increase in the Ca2+ activity by an increased density of the Ca2+ spikes train riding on an enhanced baseline. Even more enhanced activity is observed above a critical voltage of ∼20 Vpp (Fig. 3 a, arrow at the lower trace), with prolonged periods showing almost continuous enhanced activity. All fluorescence traces measure the fluorescence density (fluorescence per unit area) averaged over the entire tissue relative to the mean fluorescence density in the background (which is much lower than that of the tissue; see Video S3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Calcium dynamics. A transgenic Hydra expressing the fast Ca2+ fluorescence probe (36, 40) in its epithelial cells is utilized. (a) Ca2+ dynamics as measured by the fluorescence density (fluorescence signal per unit area) at V = 0 (upper trace) and at high external voltage (lower trace) are shown. The measurement starts 3 h after the tissue excision. The lower trace starts at 15 Vpp, which is below the critical value, and the voltage is then increased to higher values (25 Vpp; arrow). (b) Shown are example fluorescence images of the sample (at the end of the trace) at the baseline and high activity (two left images: 69 h from excision, 25 Vpp) and a bright-field image (right; 79 h, 25 Vpp) showing folding back of morphology. Scale bars, 100 μm. (c) Ca2+ activity (as in (a)) of a tissue under 15 Vpp at the onset of the measurement (upper trace) is shown. Voltage is increased to 24 Vpp (middle trace) and then switched off (lower trace). (d) Fluorescence images of low and high Ca2+ activity at the end of the upper trace (29 h, 15 Vpp) are shown. Note the tentacles indicating that the tissue regenerated. Scale bars, 100 μm. (e) Bright-field images show reversal of the morphology at the end of the middle trace and resumption of regeneration at the end of the lower trace (top image: 63 h, 24 Vpp; lower image: 77 h, 0 V). Scale bars, 100 μm. (f) Normalized distributions of fluorescence densities at V = 0 (blue) and high voltage (>15 Vpp; red) are shown. Each curve summarizes statistics of 9 tissue samples (from 3 different experiments; >10,000 measurement points for each curve). Note the y-axis logarithmic scale. All fluorescence measurements were extracted from time-lapse videos recorded at 1 min intervals. The traces show the average fluorescence density of the entire tissue relative to the mean fluorescence density in the background.

Video S3. Dynamics of Ca2+ in Reversal of Morphogenesis under an Electric Field

Time lapse fluorescence microscopy of a strain expressing the GCaMP6s probe reporting Ca2+ activity in the epithelial cells. The tissue spheroid regenerates under a voltage below the critical value and then folds back as the voltage is increased. The tissue regenerates again upon switching the voltage to zero. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (12MB, mp4)

Applying an external voltage immediately after the folding of the excised tissue to a spheroid (Fig. 3 c, upper trace; Fig. S4 a) depicts the fluorescence density of the initial spheroid tissue under 15 Vpp (1 kHz). At this voltage, which is somewhat below the critical value, the tissue immediately exhibits a significant level of Ca2+ activity, which apparently is not enough to halt morphogenesis (Figs. 3 d and S4 a, images). Increasing the voltage above criticality further increases the level of Ca2+ activity (Figs. 3 c, middle trace; Fig. S4 b), leading in turn to the folding of the already patterned Hydra back into the incipient spheroid (Figs. 3 e, upper image, and S4 b). Finally, switching the voltage to zero reduces Ca2+ activity (Figs. 3 c, bottom trace; Fig. S4 c) and leads to the recovery of morphogenesis and renewed regeneration of a mature Hydra (Figs. 3 e, lower image, and S4 c), indicating that the tissue maintains its regeneration potential (Video S3). The normalized distributions of fluorescence densities in Fig. 3 f (9 tissue samples from 3 different experiments; >10,000 measurement points for each curve) quantify a statistical measure of the Ca2+ activity, showing a significant enhanced tail of the distribution at elevated external voltages (red) compared to the one at 0 voltage (blue).

We next show that the elevated Ca2+ activity leading to reversal of morphogenesis is a manifestation of enhanced electrical excitability of the Hydra tissue. This is demonstrated along three different experimental lines. First, we demonstrate the existence of a frequency cutoff for the AC electric field, above which the tissue becomes insensitive to the applied field; morphogenesis proceeds normally, and no reversal is observed. We then show that increase in the external potassium concentration in the medium leads to enhanced calcium activity as well as reversal of morphogenesis. Finally, we also utilize direct electrical measurements, showing that calcium spikes are stimulated by bursts of action potentials.

Fig. 4 a shows Ca2+ traces at two different frequencies of the external field (1 and 3 kHz). The initial tissue spheroid first regenerates into a mature Hydra at V = 0, showing a typical low level of Ca2+ activity (Fig. 4 a, first trace; Fig. S5 a). Increasing the external voltage above the critical value (26.5 Vpp) at 1 kHz leads to a significant elevation in the level of Ca2+ activity and folding of the mature Hydra back into a spheroid morphology (Fig. 4 a, second trace; Fig. S5 b). Increasing the AC frequency to 3 kHz while maintaining the same voltage amplitude results in reduced Ca2+ activity and reemergence of a regenerated mature Hydra (Fig. 4 a, third trace; Fig. S5 c). The statistics showing the frequency sensitivity are summarized in Fig. 4 b, depicting the normalized distributions (2 tissue samples; >3000 points each) of fluorescence density at 0 and high voltage at 1 kHz (20–26.5 Vpp) and 3 kHz (26.5 Vpp). The Ca2+ activity at 3 kHz is comparable to that at zero voltage, whereas the activity at 1 kHz is significantly enhanced.

Repeating this frequency-switching cycle (Fig. 4 a, fourth trace) shows the reemergence of an elevated Ca2+ activity and backward folding of morphogenesis into a spheroid upon switching back to 1 kHz. This second cycle of backward folding, however, requires higher critical voltage to reverse morphogenesis than the first one (> 30 Vpp). Switching the frequency again to 3 kHz (at the same voltage amplitude) reduces Ca2+ activity and leads to the emergence of a re-regenerated mature Hydra (Fig. 4 a, bottom trace).

These data demonstrate the existence of a frequency cutoff around 1 kHz, above which the elevated Ca2+ activity is reduced, and morphogenesis is restored from its suspended state. This upper frequency cutoff is not a sharp cutoff at precisely 1 kHz. Nevertheless, further experiments demonstrate that at frequencies higher than ∼1 kHz, the regeneration process is insensitive to the external electric field (Video S4). The ∼1 kHz upper frequency cutoff, above which the tissue becomes “transparent” to the applied external voltage, strongly suggests a corresponding characteristic timescale of the order of a few milliseconds, which is consistent with the measured capacitance (RC) time constant of the Hydra tissue (43).

Video S4. Frequency Cutoff of the External Field

Bright-field microscopy of a tissue under an external AC electric field at two different frequencies. At 1 kHz and voltage above criticality, the Hydra exhibits reversal of morphogenesis and folds back into a spheroid while it regenerates again at 3 kHz under the same voltage. The video shows two rounds of the backward-forward morphogenesis cycle under the frequency switch. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (10.2MB, mp4)

We next follow the tissue dynamics under an elevated external potassium (K+) concentration, which causes depolarization of the cell membranes and serves as a standard method to stimulate excitable tissues, as demonstrated also in Hydra (44). Fig. 4 c shows that increasing potassium concentration in the medium from 0.1 mM (normal medium; upper trace) to 1 mM (lower trace) indeed leads to elevated Ca2+ activity (see also the normalized distributions in Fig. 4 d; two tissue samples; ∼4000 points each curve). These experiments are done in the absence of an external field. Importantly, this enhanced Ca2+ activity is accompanied by folding back of the regenerated Hydra. The tissue seems to lose its regeneration capability after the high potassium treatment. Nevertheless, it is clear that elevated potassium excites the system and leads to reversal of morphogenesis similar to that observed under an external electric field (Fig. S6).

We finally directly measure the spontaneous time-dependent electrical potential by inserting an AgCl-coated silver electrode into a tissue segment embedded in a low-melting 2% agarose gel that damps its motion while simultaneously recording fluorescence images of the Ca2+ signal under the microscope. These measurements are done in the absence of an external field stimulation and because of their invasive nature do not allow following the regeneration process. Nevertheless, the example trace in Fig. 4 e shows that every Ca2+ spike observed in the tissue is stimulated by a preburst of action potentials (34, 36, 45) (overall, we observed 167/174 measured Ca2+ spikes showing clear prebursts of action potentials leading them; see Fig. S7, a and b for more examples and the shape of the action potentials in a burst).

These three pieces of evidence of an upper frequency cutoff, excitations due to elevated potassium, and direct electrical recordings point to enhanced electrical activity of the Hydra tissue as the source of elevated Ca2+ activity and thus to the mechanism triggering reversal of morphogenesis. Previous works indeed showed that external electric fields within the same range used in our experiments cause enhanced electrical activity in mature Hydra, resulting in enhanced discharge of nematocytes (44).

Discussion

This work studies the biophysics of morphogenesis under external electric fields. The main finding is that above a critical field amplitude, morphogenesis is halted and can even be reversed in a controlled manner. The reversal trajectory maintains the integrity of the tissue and its regeneration capability, leading in some of the cases to a different body plan in the next round of regeneration. The time for re-regeneration is similar to the original regeneration time. The required significant re-regeneration time, together with the emergence of a new body plan, shows that the folding back of morphology is not a temporal stress response. Our experiments indeed demonstrate that this phenomenon is due to a genuine reversal trajectory of morphogenesis, involving both the folding back of morphology as well as the decay of the Hydra central signaling system at the head organizer. The electrical excitations stimulated by the external electric field lead to enhanced calcium excitations in the epithelium tissue. The reversal of morphogenesis can be triggered by the electrical excitations themselves or by the enhanced calcium activity in the tissue or by the combined effect of these two types of processes. Because the Hydra epithelium is basically a muscle connected by whole-animal supracellular actin fibers (31), one possibility is that enhanced calcium excitations lead to strong mechanical perturbations that in turn trigger the reversal process. The mechanism by which enhanced calcium and electrical activities redirect and modulate the course of morphogenesis remains an important open issue for future work.

The observed phenomena of halting and reversing of morphogenesis by electrical excitations, retuned by the external field, have several important implications. First, morphogenesis is usually considered a hierarchical forward-driven process in which each stage switches on the next one until the completion of a body plan (10). It was shown before that under metabolic stress, Hydra can lose its tentacles and change its body morphology in a reversible way, but this phenomenon was not further investigated (46). The observation that an external physical manipulation in the form of an electric field by triggering enhanced electrical excitations of the tissue can halt morphogenesis and even reverse it in a controlled way while maintaining the regeneration potential of the tissue, paints a picture of morphogenesis in which electrical processes play an instructive role to a level that can direct developmental trajectories not obeying this hierarchy.

Second, it shows that the electrical processes are tightly integrated with the underlying mechanical and biochemical ones (13). Folding back of the body plan of a fully developed animal simultaneously with the decay of a central signaling system at the head organizer while maintaining the regeneration capability of the tissue is highly nontrivial. It requires tight coordination of the tissue electrical processes, stimulating the reversal dynamics, with mechanical (structural changes resulting in tissue folding) and biochemical (biosignaling) processes to keep the integrity of the backward-folded tissue. In particular, the decay of the head organizer during reversal of morphogenesis demonstrates that changes in the tissue encompass more than mere morphology and also involve significant rearrangements in the underlying biological processes. How deep these biological transformations are (e.g., in reprogramming differentiated cells into stem cells) remains an exciting question for future studies. The ability to stimulate reversal of morphogenesis by an external electric field opens up new ways to further study the symbiotic dynamics of these different processes in morphogenesis. In particular, the ability to halt morphogenesis at different time points and reverse its dynamic trajectory enables us to identify the types of information stored in the developing tissues, the reservoirs of ions and biomolecules, and structural memories (31) instilled in the tissue and playing a role in the regeneration process. Furthermore, the ability to block regeneration in a controllable fashion can shed light on the origin of a tissue’s regeneration potential and reveal the reasons some tissues can readily regenerate, whereas others cannot do so.

Third, controlled reversal of morphogenesis opens the possibility for a new approach in the study of developmental systems: one would like to study the potential of a given system to realize different developmental trajectories beyond the canalized one (13). Currently, this can be done only by studying an ensemble of different systems. Controlled halting, reversing, and reinitiating a developmental process of a given tissue at different time points on demand open up a possibility for studying the developmental potential rather than an instantiation of it.

Conclusions

In summary, this work shows that an external electric field can modulate the course of morphogenesis in Hydra regeneration on demand to an extent that can reverse its developmental trajectory. It demonstrates the important role of electrical processes in morphogenesis and their dynamic integration and coordination with the biochemical and mechanical processes. It paints a picture of morphogenesis that extends beyond biochemical forward-driven hierarchical processes stabilized by symmetry-breaking fields and threshold-crossing processes. Overall, the methodology and phenomenology exposed in this work offer a unique access for studying the physics underlying one of the most fundamental processes in living systems, that is, morphogenesis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kinneret Keren and Shimon Marom for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. We thank Naama Brenner for comments on the manuscript. We thank our lab members: Anton Livshits, Lital Shani-Zerbib, Yonit Maroudas-Sacks, and Liora Garion for technical help. Special thanks to Gdalyahu Ben-Yoseph for superb technical help in designing and constructing the experimental setup and in providing the infrastructure enabling the experiments. We thank Prof. Thomas Bosch and Dr. Alexander Klimovich for their help in generating the Ca2+ strain and Prof. Brigitte Galliot for generously providing the Wnt3 strain that was first constructed in Prof. Thomas Holstein lab.

E.B. acknowledges support from the Israel Science Foundation (grant 228/17).

Editor: Stanislav Shvartsman.

Footnotes

Supporting Material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.09.007.

Supporting Material

Document S1. Figs. S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material
mmc6.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Green J.B., Sharpe J. Positional information and reaction-diffusion: two big ideas in developmental biology combine. Development. 2015;142:1203–1211. doi: 10.1242/dev.114991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller C.J., Davidson L.A. The interplay between cell signalling and mechanics in developmental processes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14:733–744. doi: 10.1038/nrg3513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lawrence P.A. Morphogens: how big is the big picture? Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:E151–E154. doi: 10.1038/35083096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mammoto T., Mammoto A., Ingber D.E. Mechanobiology and developmental control. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013;29:27–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Levin M., Martyniuk C.J. The bioelectric code: an ancient computational medium for dynamic control of growth and form. Biosystems. 2018;164:76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Silver B.B., Nelson C.M. The bioelectric code: reprogramming cancer and aging from the interface of mechanical and chemical microenvironments. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;6:21. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levin M., Pezzulo G., Finkelstein J.M. Endogenous bioelectric signaling networks: exploiting voltage gradients for control of growth and form. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2017;19:353–387. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071114-040647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Atabay K.D., LoCascio S.A., Reddien P.W. Self-organization and progenitor targeting generate stable patterns in planarian regeneration. Science. 2018;360:404–409. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Müller G.B., Newman S.A., editors. Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology (Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology) MIT Press; Massachusetts: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gilbert S.F. Sinauer Associates, Inc; Massachusetts: 2013. Developmental Biology. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Srivastava D., DeWitt N. In vivo cellular reprogramming: the next generation. Cell. 2016;166:1386–1396. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thompson D.W. Dover Publications; New York: 1942. On Growth and Form. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Braun E., Keren K. Hydra regeneration: closing the loop with mechanical processes in morphogenesis. BioEssays. 2018;40:e1700204. doi: 10.1002/bies.201700204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tyler S.E.B. Nature’s electric potential: a systematic review of the role of bioelectricity in wound healing and regenerative processes in animals, humans, and plants. Front. Physiol. 2017;8:627. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mathews A.P. Electrical polarity in the hydroids. Am. J. Physiol. 1903;8:294–299. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McCaig C.D., Rajnicek A.M., Zhao M. Controlling cell behavior electrically: current views and future potential. Physiol. Rev. 2005;85:943–978. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00020.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao M. Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009;20:674–682. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Robinson K.R., Messerli M.A. Left/right, up/down: the role of endogenous electrical fields as directional signals in development, repair and invasion. BioEssays. 2003;25:759–766. doi: 10.1002/bies.10307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Durant F., Morokuma J., Levin M. Long-term, stochastic editing of regenerative anatomy via targeting endogenous bioelectric gradients. Biophys. J. 2017;112:2231–2243. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McLaughlin K.A., Levin M. Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form. Dev. Biol. 2018;433:177–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Roux W. Uber die morphologische Polarisation von Eiern und Embryonen durch den electrischen Strom. Sitzungsber. Acad. Wiss. Wien Math. Naturwiss. 1892;101:27–228. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marsh G., Beams H.W. Electrical control of morphogenesis in regenerating Dugesia tigrina. I. Relation of axial polarity to field strength. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1952;39:191–213. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030390203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sánchez Alvarado A. Planarian regeneration: its end is its beginning. Cell. 2006;124:241–245. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gierer A., Berking S., Trenkner E. Regeneration of hydra from reaggregated cells. Nat. New Biol. 1972;239:98–101. doi: 10.1038/newbio239098a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Trembley A. Jean & Herman Verbeek; Leiden, the Netherlands: 1744. Mémoires pour Servir à l’Histoire d’un Genre de Polypes D’eau Douce, à Bras en Forme de Cornes. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lenhoff S.G., Lenhoff H.M., Trembley A. The Boxwood Press; California: 1986. Hydra and the Birth of Experimental Biology, 1744: Abraham Trembley’s Mémoires concerning the Polyps. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bode M.P., Bode H.R. Formation of pattern in regenerating tissue pieces of Hydra attenuata. III. The shaping of the body column. Dev. Biol. 1984;106:315–325. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90230-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Park H.D., Ortmeyer A.B., Blankenbaker D.P. Cell division during regeneration in Hydra. Nature. 1970;227:617–619. doi: 10.1038/227617a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Futterer C., Colombo C., Ott A. Morphogenetic oscillations during symmetry breaking of regenerating Hydra vulgaris cells. Europhys. Lett. 2003;64:137–143. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kücken M., Soriano J., Nicola E.M. An osmoregulatory basis for shape oscillations in regenerating hydra. Biophys. J. 2008;95:978–985. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.117655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Livshits A., Shani-Zerbib L., Keren K. Structural inheritance of the actin cytoskeletal organization determines the body axis in regenerating hydra. Cell Rep. 2017;18:1410–1421. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cummings S.G., Bode H.R. Head regeneration and polarity reversal in Hydra attenuata can occur in the absence of DNA synthesis. Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1984;194:79–86. doi: 10.1007/BF00848347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Campbell R.D., Josephson R.K., Rushforth N.B. Excitability of nerve-free hydra. Nature. 1976;262:388–390. doi: 10.1038/262388a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Josephson R.K., Macklin M. Transepithelial potentials in Hydra. Science. 1967;156:1629–1631. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3782.1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kass-Simon G., Diesl V.K. Spontaneous and evoked potentials from dissociated epithelial cells of Hydra. Nature. 1977;265:75–77. doi: 10.1038/265075a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Szymanski J.R., Yuste R. Mapping the whole-body muscle activity of Hydra vulgaris. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:1807–1817.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vogg M.C., Beccari L., Galliot B. An evolutionarily-conserved Wnt3/β-catenin/Sp5 feedback loop restricts head organizer activity in Hydra. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:312. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08242-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakamura Y., Tsiairis C.D., Holstein T.W. Autoregulatory and repressive inputs localize Hydra Wnt3 to the head organizer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:9137–9142. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018109108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Klimovich A., Wittlieb J., Bosch T.C.G. Transgenesis in Hydra to characterize gene function and visualize cell behavior. Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:2069–2090. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0173-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dupre C., Yuste R. Non-overlapping neural networks in Hydra vulgaris. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:1085–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hobmayer B., Rentzsch F., Holstein T.W. WNT signalling molecules act in axis formation in the diploblastic metazoan Hydra. Nature. 2000;407:186–189. doi: 10.1038/35025063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bode H.R. The head organizer in Hydra. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2012;56:473–478. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.113448hb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Osephson R.K., Macklin M. Electrical properties of the body wall of Hydra. J. Gen. Physiol. 1969;53:638–665. doi: 10.1085/jgp.53.5.638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gitter A.H., Oliver D., Thurm U. Calcium- and voltage-dependence of nematocyst discharge in Hydra vulgaris. J. Comp. Physiol. A Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol. 1994;175:115–122. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Itayama T., Sawada Y. Development of electrical activity in regenerating aggregates of hydra cells. J. Exp. Zool. 1995;273:519–526. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402730608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Newman S.A. Reversible abolition of normal morphology in Hydra. Nat. New Biol. 1973;244:126–128. doi: 10.1038/newbio244126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Video S1. Reversal of Morphogenesis

Bright-field microscopy video of a tissue spheroid regenerating into a mature Hydra and then folding back its morphology under an electric field. The reversed tissue regenerates again upon the reduction of the external voltage to zero. A second round of reversal of morphogenesis then follows. Note the differences in the critical voltages required for reversal of morphogenesis for the first and second rounds; the voltage range in the first round is 20-30 V while in the second round is 30-40 V. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (18.3MB, mp4)
Video S2. Decay of Wnt3 during Reversal of Morphogenesis

The same sample as in Video S1 is observed under a fluorescence microscope for GFP (left) and RFP (right). The GFP is under the Wnt3 promoter and the RFP is under the control of the ubiquitous Hydra actin promoter and serves as a fluorescence reference. The video shows the two rounds of reversal of morphogenesis as in Video S1. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (12.7MB, mp4)
Video S3. Dynamics of Ca2+ in Reversal of Morphogenesis under an Electric Field

Time lapse fluorescence microscopy of a strain expressing the GCaMP6s probe reporting Ca2+ activity in the epithelial cells. The tissue spheroid regenerates under a voltage below the critical value and then folds back as the voltage is increased. The tissue regenerates again upon switching the voltage to zero. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (12MB, mp4)
Video S4. Frequency Cutoff of the External Field

Bright-field microscopy of a tissue under an external AC electric field at two different frequencies. At 1 kHz and voltage above criticality, the Hydra exhibits reversal of morphogenesis and folds back into a spheroid while it regenerates again at 3 kHz under the same voltage. The video shows two rounds of the backward-forward morphogenesis cycle under the frequency switch. The scale of the image is ∼1.1 mm and the running time is from the point of tissue excision.

Download video file (10.2MB, mp4)
Document S1. Figs. S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supporting Material
mmc6.pdf (3.2MB, pdf)

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES