Skip to main content
BMC Surgery logoLink to BMC Surgery
. 2019 Oct 29;19:158. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0608-3

Case report and literature review: patient with gastroduodenal intussusception due to the gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the lesser curvature of the gastric body

Mihajlo Đokić 1, Jerica Novak 2,, Miha Petrič 1, Branislava Ranković 3, Miha Štabuc 4, Blaž Trotovšek 1
PMCID: PMC6819360  PMID: 31664984

Abstract

Background

Intussusception in adult patient is rare. Gastroduodenal intussusception due to the gastrointestinal stromal tumors is infrequently described in the literature. Authors present a case of gastroduodenal intussusception due to the low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the lesser curvature of the gastric body with literature review.

Case presentation

Sixty-two-year-old male was admitted to our hospital with symptoms of acute gastric outlet obstruction. Imaging studies confirmed a lesion of the gastric wall producing gastroduodenal intussusception with pylorus obstruction. Upon laparotomy a tumor mass of the lesser curvature of the gastric body that invaginated through the pylorus into the duodenum was found. Desinvagination and resection of the tumor with the adequate resection margins were performed. Histology reveled a low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Due to favorable outcome only observation was suggested by the multidisciplinary team.

Conclusions

Gastroduodenal intussusception due to the gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the gastric wall is a rare event. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice. In selected cases laparosopic resection of the tumor can be performed.

Keywords: Gastroduodenal intussusception, Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor, Gastric outlet obstruction

Background

Intussusception rarely occurs among the adult patients. It accounts for 5% of all intussusception cases and in only 1% causes intestinal obstruction [1]. Gastroduodenal intussusception is the most infrequent form of intussusception in adults, it occurs in less than 10% [2]. Clinical and radiological findings in a patient with gastric outlet obstruction, gastroduodenal intussusception and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the lesser curvature of the gastric body is presented.

Case presentation

62-year-old Caucasian male presented to the emergency room with acutely worsening epigastric pain lasting for several days and black stool lasting for a week. Symptoms of vomiting, inappetence and weight loss that have been lasting for the past six months without doctor appointment was also reported in medical history. Patient had a history of diabetes mellitus on insulin therapy. Upon clinical examination abdomen was not distended, there was no signs of guarding or rebound tenderness. Laboratory data showed anemia (hemoglobin 119 g/L, normal range 130–170 g/L; hematocrit 0.343, normal range 0.4–0.5), leukocytosis (13.5 109/L, normal range 4.0–10.0) and normal value of C-reactive protein (below 5 mg/L, normal range 0–5 mg/L). Tumor markers CEA and Ca 19–9 were within normal range.

Due to melena lasting for a week, patient underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and ultrasound of the abdomen on the outpatient bases only few days prior to admission to the hospital. EGD was technically demanding due to the poor passage of the endoscope through the stomach, duodenal bulbous and upper part of the duodenum. Inflation of the gastric body was not possible, therefore the visualization of the gastric wall was poor with no obvious intraluminal mass or hemorrhage detected. Additionally gastric peristalsis was described to be absent. Abdominal ultrasound showed tumor formation of the gastric body, measuring 7 × 5 cm, but no intussusception was described. CT scan revealed a 5.4 × 5.6 × 6.2 cm intraluminal tumor formation of the lesser curvature of the gastric body with well defined borders was described. Tumor mass caused invagination of the gastric cardia through the antrum and pylorus into the D2 part of the duodenum producing gastric outlet obstruction (Figs. 1, 2). No dissemination to the parenchymal organs was described.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A CT scan demonstrating an intraluminal tumor of the lesser curvature of the gastric body producing a gastroduodenal intussusception with gastric outlet obstruction

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A CT scan demonstrating an intraluminal tumor of the lesser curvature of the gastric body producing a gastroduodenal intussusception with gastric outlet obstruction

Explorative laparotomy was performed. Palpable gastric mass with impaction of the tumor through the pylorus into the duodenum without signs of disseminated disease in the abdomen. Was found (Figs. 3, 4). Kocher mobilization of the duodenum and the head of pancreas was necessary for the successful desinvagination of the tumor. Anterior gastrotomy reveled a solid, well defined, intraluminal tumor of the lesser curvature of the gastric body just below the gastroesophageal junction. Circular radical resection of the tumor with one centimeter resection margin was performed. The gastric wall defect was sutured in transverse manner in two layers. Postoperative period was uneventful and patient was discharged on the ninth postoperative day.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Palpable intraluminal gastric tumor with the impaction of mass through the pylorus into the duodenum with no other pathological finding in the abdominal cavity

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Palpable intraluminal gastric tumor with the impaction of mass through the pylorus into the duodenum with no other pathological finding in the abdominal cavity

Sample was send for pathohistological examination. Macroscopically specimen contained a well-defined 7.5 × 5.5 × 4 cm solid, grey mass with no necrosis (Fig. 5). Microscopical examination with hematoxylin and eosin staining (HE) and imunohistochemical staining revealed GIST with expression of CD117 and DOG1 (Figs. 6, 7 and 8). Tumor invaded the submucosal layer and muscularis propria but no necrosis or lymphovascular invasion was observed. Mitotic rate was 0/5/mm2. Proliferation marker Ki67 was less than 5%. Resection margins were free of disease. Tumor was pathologic staged as T3.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Solid mass with well defined borders

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Microscopic image of GIST, HE staining, × 20 magnification

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Microscopic image of GIST, imunohistochemical staining, CD117 positive, × 10 magnification

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Microscopic image of GIST, imunohistochemical staining, DOG1 positive, × 10 magnification

Patient case was presented on the multidisciplinary team meeting and due to low-risk GIST with favorable prognosis only observation is suggested.

Discussion and conclusions

Authors report a case report of 62 years old patient with gastric outlet obstruction due to the gastroduodenal intussusception caused by a large, low risk GIST of the lesser curvature of the gastric body.

Intussusception in adults is an infrequent condition, therefore when the patient presents with the symptoms of the upper gastrointestinal obstruction, other causes should be considered [3]. Gastrointestinal intussusception is a very rare find where malignant or benign lesion of the gastric wall initiates the prolaps of the gastric wall through the pylorous into the duodenum. According to the literature, gastroduodenal intussusception accounts for only 10% of documented intussusceptions in the adults [2]. GIST of the gastrointestinal tract are rare, reported incidence is highest in Asia [4]. Most GIST arise from gastric wall (56%), followed by the small intestine and colon [4]. By authors best knowledge, GIST was described, as a leading point for gastroduodenal intussusception in only 17 cases (Table 1) [521].

Table 1.

Review of the case reports on gastroduodenal intussusception with GIST

Reference Age (years) Sex Location Size (cm) Presentation Treatment
Yildiz [5] 85 F Fundus 6 × 5 Symptoms of acute pancreatitis, weight loss for 6 months Subtotal gastrectomy
Rittenhouse [6] 52 F Fundus 5 × 5 Epigastric pain and vomiting for 1 day Laparoscopic wedge resection
Crowther [7] 59 F Anterior wall of antrum 6 Intermittent epigastric pain with vomiting for 3 weeks Partial gastrectomy
M S [8] 74 M Posterior wall No data Intermitent vomiting for 3 weeks Partial gastrectomy
Chan [9] 34 F Posterior wall of fundus 6.5 × 4.4 × 3.8 Epigastric pain Laparoscopic wedge resection
Basir [10] 62 F Posterior wall of distal body 5.2 × 3.5 × 3.2 Epigastric pain with melena for 3 days Bilroth’s II partial gastrectomy
Adjepong [11] 84 M Antrum 4x3x3 Intermitent abdominal pain, vomiting, weight loss and melena for 6 weeks Laparoscopic bilroth’s II partial gastrectomy
Wilson [12] 78 F Antrum 4.4 × 3.3 × 3.4 Epigastric pain and vomiting for 1 week Laparoscopic wedge resection
Yamauchi [13] 95 F Posterior wall of distal body 4.2 × 3.9 Vomiting, loss of apetite and melena for 1 week Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Gyedu [14] 59 F Anterior wall 7x6x5 Intermitent vomitig for 5 months Partial gastrectomy
Siam [15] 29 M Antrum 6 × 6 Intermittent epigastric pain, vomiting and melena for 5 months Bilroth’s I partial gastrectomy
Zhou [16] 69 M Posterior wall of antrum 4.5 × 4 Acute abdominal pain with vomiting for 6 h Wedge resection
Jameel [17] 65 F Anterior wall of antrum 6x6x4 Epigastric pain and intermittent postprandial vomiting for 6 months Wedge resection
Shum [18] 34 F Fundus 5 × 5 Intermittent epigastric pain Partial gastrectomy
Ssentongo [19] 85 F Fundus 2.5 × 2.5 Epigastric pain and melena for 1 day, postprandial vomiting for 14 days Wedge resection
Komatsubara [20] 90 F Fundus 5 × 4.5 × 4 Vomiting, loss of appetite Wedge resection
De U [21] 42 F Anterior wall of antrum 8x7x4 Abdominal pain for 6 months Wedge resection

Reviewing the literature, patients with GIST and gastroduodenal intussusception most commonly presented with nonspecific symptoms of acute or intermittent abdominal pain with vomiting lasting from a day to several months (Table 1) [521]. Similar to our patient in some reports GI bleeding was noticed (Table 1) [9, 10, 13]. In the published cases of GIST producing gastroduodenal intussusception reported median age was 65 years (mean 64.5 years, range 29–95 years), predominantly female (76.5%) [521].

Standard histopathological examination of the specimen and H&E staining are not enough for the diagnosis of GIST. Immunohistochemical studies are the golden standard [22]. GIST is typically confirmed by positive staining for CD117 antibody as was the case in this report [23]. As proposed in the literature, 4–15% of GIST can be CD117 negative, therefore additional immunohistochemical staining for DOG1 antibodies should be performed to confirm the diagnosis [24].

In case of gastroduodenal intususception, reduction of the invagination can be performed endoscopically. In described case, where a large GIST led to the intussusception and protrusion of the gastroesophageal junction through the pylorus, endoscopic reduction of the invagination was not feasible. Moreover, upon endoscopy, the stomach was not visible and the tumor was not recognized. Both imaging techniques, ultrasound and CT scan of the abdomen, respectively, described tumor formation of the gastric wall with CT scan describing the gastroduodenal intusussception. Desinvagination and desimpaction of the tumor was not possible until Kocher mobilisation of the duodenum and pancreatic head was performed.

Surgery remains the treatment of choice for resectable GIST with no dissemination but also for oligometastatic disease with potentially resectable liver metastases. In many cases, especially in low-risk GIST, surgery represents the definitive treatment. A wide local resection with clear resection margins is recommended. In cases of invasion to the adjacent organs en-block resection should be performed. Systemic therapy may be indicated in patients with high-risk tumors and in patient with unresectable tumor or metastatic disease. Small lesions can be resected laparoscopically. Endoscopic resection of the GIST is not recommended [25]. In the literature only one case of endoscopic resection of the GIST producing intussusception was described. Endoscopic resection was performed in case of a 95-year-old patient who declined surgery. Tumor mesured 4 cm and was successfully reduced endoscopically. Due to the repeated invagination and surgery refusal only submucosal dissection of the lesion for the purpose of local treatment was performed [13]. Upon the literature review in cases of GIST producing gastroduodenal intussusception, lesions measured more than 5 cm (median 5.1 cm, mean 5.3 cm, range 2.5–8 cm) [521]. As in described case, in majority of patients with large lesions, exploratory laparotomy was performed. The extent of resection ranged from wedge resection to subtotal gastrectomy [58, 10, 1421]. In one third of described cases (29.5%), laparoscopic resection was performed (Table 1).

GIST of the gastric wall rarely produces gastroduodenal intussusception. As shown in our case patients with low-grade GIST have favorable prognosis and in most cases radical surgical resection is the only treatment needed. When GIST arise from the gastric wall, resection of the tumor with adequate resection margins should be performed. For small lesions where desinvagination can be achieved endoscopically, laparoscopic resection of the tumor can be considered. In cases of large, impacted lesions, open approach with desinvagination and tumor resection is advisable.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbrevations

EGD

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

HE

Hematoxylin and eosin staining

Authors’ contributions

TB has been involved in the management of the patient and in the conception of the manuscript. JN wrote the manuscript. DM, MP and TB assisted in the preparation of the manuscript and critically reviewed the manuscript. RB contributed to the pathological diagnosis of this patient. SM performed radiologial diagnostics and interpretaded the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All available data are presented in the case.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to participate to this case report.

Consent for publication

Informed written consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of the clinical details and clinical images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Mihajlo Đokić, Email: mihajlo.djokic@kclj.si.

Jerica Novak, Email: jenovak@onko-i.si.

Miha Petrič, Email: miha.petric@kclj.si.

Branislava Ranković, Email: Branislava.RANKOVIC@mf.uni-lj.si.

Miha Štabuc, Email: miha.stabuc@kclj.si.

Blaž Trotovšek, Email: blaz.trotovsek@kclj.si.

References

  • 1.Azar T, Berger DL. Adult intussusception. Ann Surg. 1997;226:134–138. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stubenbord WT. Intussusception in adults. Ann Surg. 1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Gambardella C, Allaria A, Siciliano G, Mauriello C, Patrone R, Avenia N, Polistena A, Sanguinetti A, Napolitano S, Conzo G. Recurrent esophageal stricture from previous caustic ingestion treated with 40-year self-dilation: case report and review of literature. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0801-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Søreide K, Sandvik OM, Søreide JA, Giljaca V, Jureckova A, Bulusu VR. Global epidemiology of gastrointestinalstromal tumours (GIST): a systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;40:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yildiz MS, Doğan A, Koparan IH, Adin ME. Acute pancreatitis and gastroduodenal intussusception induced by an underlying gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report. K Gastric Cancer. 2016;16:54–57. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2016.16.1.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rittenhouse DW, Lim PW, Shirley LA, Chojnacki KA. Gastroduodenal intussusception of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(2):e70–e73. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31826d72d4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Crowther KS, Wyld L, Yamani Q, JAcob G. Case report: gastroduodenal intussusception of a gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:987–989. doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.900.750987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.M S PB, Reddy CK, Augustine AJ, Sagari SG. Gastroduodenal intussusception due to pedunculated polypoid gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): a rare case. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9 (1): PD05–06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.Chan CT, Wong SK, Ping Tai Y, Li MK. Endo-laparoscopic reduction and resection of gastroduodenal intussusception of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): a synchronous endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19(3):e100–e103. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a03f07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Basir N, Yaakub AB, Kafeel G, Telisinghe PU, Tan KK, Sharif F, Chong VH. Gastroduodenal intussusception as a first manifestation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2012;23(2):185–186. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2012.0456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Adjepong SE, Parameswaran R, Perry A, Mathews R, Jones R, Butterworth JR, Sigurdsson A. Gastroduodenal intussusception due to gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) treated by laparoscopic billroth II distal gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16(4):245–247. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200608000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilson MH, Ayoub F, McGreal P, Collins C. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour presenting as gastroduodenal intussusception. BMJ Case Rep 2012. bcr2012006787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Yamauchi K, Iwamuro M, Ishii E, Narita M, Hirata N, Okada H. Gastroduodenal intussusception with a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated by endoscopic submucocal dissection. Intern Med. 2017;56(12):1515–1519. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.8160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gyedu A, Reich SB, Hoyte-Williams PE. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour presenting acutely as gastroduodenal intussusception. Acta Chir Belg. 2011;111(5):327–328. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2011.11680764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Siam FA, Siow SL. Stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) intussuscepted into duodenum: a case report. Malays J Med Sci. 2008;15(4):68–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou Y, Wu XD, Shi Q, Xu CH. Jia J. Gastroduodenal intussusception and pylorus obstruction induced by a c-KIT-negative gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: case report and review of the literature. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 17.Jameel ARA, Segamalai D, Murugaiyan G, Shanmugasundaram R, Obla NB. Gastroduodenal intussusception due to gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(8):PD09–PD10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26292.10398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shum JS, Lo SS, Ka SY, Yeung CW, Ho JT. Gastroduodenal intussusception. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32(6):698–700. doi: 10.1007/s00261-007-9179-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ssentongo P, Egan M, Arkorful TE, Dorvlo T, Scott O, Oh JS, Amponsah-Manu F. Adult intussusception due to gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a rare case report, comprehensive literature review, and diagnostic challenges in low-resource countries. Case Rep Surg. 2018;1395230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Komatsubara T, Zuiki T, Lefor AK, Hirota N, Oki J. Unusual gastroduodenal intussusception secondary to a gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the gastric fundus. Int J Surg Open. 2016;5:33–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2016.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De U, Basu S. Gastroduodenal intussusception due to gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Clin Case Rep. 2018;6(11):2276–2278. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blay JY, von Mehren M, Blackstein ME. Perspective on updated treatment guidelines for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer. 2010;116(22):5126–5137. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006;130(10):1466–1478. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1466-GSTROM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Espinosa I, Lee CH, Kim MK, Rouse BT, Subramanian S, Montgomery K, Varma S, Corless CL, Heinrich MC, Smith KS, Wang Z, Rubin B, Nielsen TO. Seitz RS, Ross DT, West RB, Cleary ML, van de Rijn M. A novel monoclonal antibody against DOG1 is a sensitive and specific marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(2):210–218. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181238cec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Reid R, Bulusu R, Carroll N, Eatock M, Geh I, Judson I, O’Dwyer P, Warren B, Seddon B, Hill G. Guidelines for the Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumours (GIST) 2009. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All available data are presented in the case.


Articles from BMC Surgery are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES