Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2019 Oct 29;10(5):e00317-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00317-19

Molecular Imaging: a Novel Tool To Visualize Pathogenesis of Infections In Situ

Oren Gordon a,b,#, Camilo A Ruiz-Bedoya a,b,#, Alvaro A Ordonez a,b, Elizabeth W Tucker b,c, Sanjay K Jain a,b,
Editor: Danielle A Garsind
PMCID: PMC6819656  PMID: 31662452

Molecular imaging is an emerging technology that enables the noninvasive visualization, characterization, and quantification of molecular events within living subjects. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a clinically available molecular imaging tool with significant potential to study pathogenesis of infections in humans.

KEYWORDS: heterogeneity, infectious disease, molecular imaging, pathogenesis, positron emission tomography

ABSTRACT

Molecular imaging is an emerging technology that enables the noninvasive visualization, characterization, and quantification of molecular events within living subjects. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a clinically available molecular imaging tool with significant potential to study pathogenesis of infections in humans. PET enables dynamic assessment of infectious processes within the same subject with high temporal and spatial resolution and obviates the need for invasive tissue sampling, which is difficult in patients and generally limited to a single time point, even in animal models. This review presents current state-of-the-art concepts on the application of molecular imaging for infectious diseases and details how PET imaging can facilitate novel insights into infectious processes, ongoing development of pathogen-specific imaging, and simultaneous in situ measurements of intralesional antimicrobial pharmacokinetics in multiple compartments, including privileged sites. Finally, the potential clinical applications of this promising technology are also discussed.

INTRODUCTION

Noninvasive molecular imaging is a powerful clinical tool for the early diagnosis and monitoring of various disease processes. Next-generation molecular imaging promises unparalleled opportunities for visualizing infections, since molecular and cellular alterations occur earlier than structural changes in a pathological process. This rapidly developing technology has already become an essential tool in the field of oncology, with similar potential for infectious diseases (1). Currently there are several available molecular imaging techniques. Optical imaging with bioluminescent or fluorescent biomarkers is widely used and has excellent sensitivity. However, it is generally two-dimensional and importantly has limited depth penetration (<1 cm), restricting its use to small animal models and surgical or endoscopic procedures in patients (2). Novel methodologies recently developed, significantly enhance light microscopy capabilities. The CLARITY technique replaces target tissue lipids with a water-based gel that renders the tissue optically transparent enabling intact-tissue staining in nonsectioned tissue (3) and enabled high-resolution and detailed three-dimensional in situ imaging, however, as more traditional methods, these methods relay on invasive tissue acquisition. Conversely, nuclear-medicine-based molecular imaging utilizes “tracers” or “probes” labeled with high-energy emission radionuclides, which can be used to target specific molecular pathways deep inside the body (4, 5). Three-dimensional spatial localization of biomarkers in nuclear medicine techniques is determined by measuring the source of the radionuclide attached to the biomarker. Among the available molecular imaging techniques, positron emission tomography (PET) is highly sensitive (pmol/liter) and can be used to visualize a variety of in vivo biological processes (6). PET is often coregistered with conventional imaging such as computed-tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for anatomic reference (7). Advancements in technology, such as whole-body PET (8), enable exquisite sensitivity (40×), increasing the clinical utility of PET. Nonnuclear and clinically available MRI-based molecular imaging approaches such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are also able to provide detailed structural, functional, and metabolic information utilizing endogenous or exogenous contrast agents, although with a lower sensitivity than PET. Finally, ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging are also being developed for molecular imaging applications with promise for future applications to infections.

Molecular PET imaging allows the integration of molecular and physiological data with anatomical information in individual patients. In oncology, clinical molecular PET imaging enables early detection, real-time therapeutic monitoring, and the ability to streamline drug development (9). PET utilizing 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), a glucose analog that is selectively taken up by cells with a high rate of glucose metabolism, is a valuable clinical tool for predicting tumor response to treatment and patient survival (10). However, 18F-FDG is nonspecific and accumulates in tissues with increased metabolic activity regardless of the underlying pathology (i.e., cancer, inflammation, infection). Therefore, target-specific PET probes for cancer are being developed to allow for a more specific diagnosis (11). In drug development, molecular PET imaging is particularly useful in target validation, whole-body target expression and heterogeneity, whole-body drug distribution, pharmacokinetics (PK) (e.g., drug penetration into privileged sites such as the central nervous system [CNS] penetration), and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects (12). Other areas in medicine also use molecular PET imaging. For instance, PET is used for monitoring autoimmune and inflammatory diseases and vasculitis (13). In cardiology, PET can evaluate cardiac metabolism (i.e., myocardial viability, perfusion, inflammation) in heart failure (14). Treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease increasingly incorporates PET into management algorithms due to its use in detecting atherosclerosis, thrombosis, and myocardial infarction (15). Finally, molecular imaging for the diagnosis and management of infectious diseases is gaining momentum with technological advancements and a growing clinical need for holistic and individualized information for patient care, not feasible with other current technologies.

UNDERSTANDING DISEASE PATHOGENESIS IN SITU

Understanding the pathogenesis of infectious diseases is essential in the development and assessment of novel therapeutics. It would be particularly useful if the same tools utilized in preclinical models could be also translated into the clinic and thus help in the standardization of the readouts. PET imaging of live animals or patients to study infections overcomes several fundamental limitations of current laboratory techniques which are generally invasive and rely on tissue resection. Molecular imaging provides holistic three-dimensional readouts and allows the study of biology in situ, with relatively unaltered physiology and lack of processing or other artifacts that can occur during resection and analysis of tissues (Fig. 1). It also allows longitudinal profiling in the same subject at several time points to understand the changes in lesion pathology over time, while reducing subject-to-subject variability.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Molecular imaging tools. (A) Traditional tools used to study infections such as microbiology, microscopy, and molecular techniques (e.g., PCR and mass spectrometry), require tissue excision, which is prone to contamination and sampling bias, and the tools are also generally limited to a single time point. Molecular imaging can address some of these limitations and complement traditional tools. Histology and imaging were adapted from Ordonez et al. (34, 86). (B) Comparison of the commonly available molecular imaging techniques. PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, single photon emission computed tomography; CT, computed tomography.

Spatial heterogeneity.

It is increasingly being recognized that many different infectious lesions with distinct bacterial burdens, antimicrobial exposures, and local biology can coexist in the same host (1619). Molecular imaging can measure inter- and intrasubject heterogeneity at a lesion, organ, or whole-body level. Molecular PET imaging can also characterize these local heterogeneous microenvironments for pathogen dynamics, immune response, and environmental cues. For example, hypoxia is considered to be a major determinant of bacterial persistence in human tuberculosis (TB) (20). Therefore, Harper et al. (21) used copper-64(II)-diacetyl-bis(N4-methyl-thiosemicarbazone) (64Cu-ATSM), a PET tracer used to detect hypoxic lung lesions in a mouse model of TB and confirmed using postmortem analyses. While no tracer accumulation was noted in nonhypoxic TB lesions in acutely infected or in control mice without lesions, a progressive, time-dependent tracer accumulation was noted in chronically infected mice, which are considered hypoxic. These findings were subsequently confirmed in TB patients using 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) PET imaging (22). In another study, Davis et al. (23) used single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to detect and localize an engineered Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain where a bacterial thymidine kinase (TK) was introduced under the control of a strong mycobacterial promoter. TK phosphorylates 1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-β-d-arabinofuranosyl)-5-125I-iodouracil (125I-FIAU), a nucleoside analog, leading to trapping and accumulation of 125I-FIAU in the M. tuberculosis Phsp60 TK strain. Thus, bacteria were specifically and noninvasively detected in experimentally infected animals demonstrating heterogeneous bacterial burdens in visible TB lesions (23). Infection dynamics are closely related to the host immune response. In a well-established nonhuman primate model of tuberculosis (24), Martin et al. used genome-encoded barcodes to uniquely tag individual M. tuberculosis bacilli and quantitatively track the trajectory of the infecting bacterium (25). By coupling this tagging strategy with 18F-FDG PET/CT of lung pathology in macaques, they demonstrated that a subset of TB lesions, distinguishable by imaging features, were responsible for the majority of bacterial dissemination (25). 18F-FDG PET has also been employed to monitor the heterogeneity of the host metabolic responses. In a nonhuman primate model of cerebral malaria, 18F-FDG PET demonstrated decreased cerebral metabolic activity. A diffuse and heterogeneous reduction of metabolic activity in the frontal and temporal lobes was noted prior to evidence of neuropathological findings (26).

Temporal monitoring.

PET imaging allows for repeated measurements to quantify temporal changes in the same subject. Dormant bacteria are commonly believed to inhabit established TB lesions, although this is controversial (27). Nonetheless, the spatial location of dormant bacteria has never been demonstrated experimentally in live hosts, and their precise location still remains elusive. Therefore, Murawski et al. utilized sequential 18F-FDG PET/CT to monitor the spatial and temporal evolution of individual pulmonary TB lesions in experimentally infected mice over the course of TB treatment and subsequent development of relapse (28). They discovered that although several new lesions arose de novo during reactivation TB within lungs regions with no lesions prior to TB treatment, suggesting that dormant bacteria may also reside outside established lesions. Similarly, serial PET/CT in M. tuberculosis-infected macaque lungs and a rabbit model of TB meningitis also demonstrated that individual TB lesions are dynamic and change independently during infection with different drug penetration and with lesions regressing and egressing in the same host (29, 30). Figure 2A demonstrates the utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT to follow M. tuberculosis pulmonary lesions in a murine model of pulmonary TB.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Temporal monitoring. Imaging allows for repeat measurements to quantify temporal changes in the same subject. (A) Serial monitoring of individual TB pulmonary lesions in the same mouse demonstrates dynamic and independent evolution. (B) Serial 11C-rifampin PET in a rabbit model of TB meningitis demonstrates spatially heterogeneous brain penetration that rapidly decreased as early as 2 weeks into treatment (adapted from Tucker et al. [29]). (C) 18F-FDS PET performed before and after initiation of antimicrobial treatment in a murine model of E. coli myositis can rapidly monitor treatment efficacy, demonstrating a PET signal proportionate to the bacterial burden. This method can also be used to detect therapeutic failures due to infections with multidrug-resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli (adapted from Weinstein et al. [36]).

Repeat measurements can also be used to monitor treatment and provide prognostic information. For example, 18F-FDG PET was successfully used to evaluate the bactericidal activity of multidrug treatments in mice (31). In cynomolgus macaques with latent TB, increased 18F-FDG PET pulmonary activity or extrapulmonary involvement prior to measures that induce reactivation TB ([tumor necrosis factor alpha TNF-α] neutralizing antibody) predicted reactivation TB with high accuracy (32). Activated macrophages are the key components of TB-associated inflammation. Foss et al. demonstrated that radioiodinated DPA-713, a synthetic ligand of the translocator protein (TSPO) which is highly upregulated in activated microglia and macrophages, is selectively retained within macrophages and phagocytic cells in pulmonary TB lesions (33). In a subsequent study comparing 125I-DPA-713 SPECT with 18F-FDG PET in a mouse model of pulmonary TB, 125I-DPA-713 SPECT was found to be a better predictor than 18F-FDG PET of early bactericidal activities of TB treatments (34). 124I-DPA-713 PET has also been utilized successfully to image neuro-inflammation in a rabbit model of TB meningitis (35). Pathogen-specific PET tracers have also been utilized to rapidly monitor response to antimicrobial treatments and detect therapeutic failures associated with drug-resistant organisms (36, 37). In simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected rhesus macaques 64Cu-labeled SIV Gp120-specific antibody was used for PET imaging and was able to trace viral dynamics following antiretroviral treatment (ART) identifying reservoirs of the virus even in monkeys controlling the infection (38). Complementing this with in vivo tracing of CD4 T lymphocytes, could provide a comprehensive evaluation of the response to treatment (39).

Molecular imaging to study antimicrobial PK/PD in vivo.

While antimicrobials are among the most commonly prescribed drugs, up to 50% are inappropriately utilized or not optimized for efficacy (40). Antibacterial efficacy is determined by the susceptibility of the microorganism to the antimicrobial, which is a feature of the organism and commonly assayed using the MIC (41). However, the MIC does not account for the heterogeneous in vivo microenvironments that may change the bacterial susceptibility to the antibiotic as well as antimicrobial exposures achieved at infection sites in vivo. While MIC data in combination with clinical studies have been used to determine antimicrobial breakpoints and antimicrobial dosing (42), they are based on measurements of antimicrobial concentrations in plasma, which do not always accurately correlate with intralesional or target tissue concentrations, nor take into account the heterogeneity of different infected tissues in the same host (43). A low concentration of the antimicrobial in the infected tissue may lead to treatment failure, require the need for prolonged treatment durations, and promote the emergence of drug-resistant organisms. Conversely, unnecessarily high antimicrobial concentrations can lead to toxicities, organ injury, drug intolerance, and noncompliance (44). There is an urgent unmet need to improve the current knowledge of antibiotic intralesional PK/PD properties to optimize antimicrobial use and facilitate new drug development (4). Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) are promising techniques that can provide detailed intralesional biodistribution but require invasive tissue sampling (45). However, these techniques are prone to sampling errors and generally limited to single time points, precluding the ability to measure PK parameters such as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or changes in drug concentrations with treatment or progression of disease (46).

Whereas the use of PET for PK/PD assessments in oncology has facilitated efforts for drug discovery and clinical translation (47), its application for infectious diseases is still an emerging field (48). PET utilizing radiolabeled antimicrobials provides a noninvasive solution to these challenges. For example, rifampin is a key first-line TB antibiotic required for sterilization and also used to treat infections due to other bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus. However, even after 50 years of clinical use, we still do not know how to optimally dose rifampin. Recently, Tucker et al. utilized 11C-rifampin, a radiolabeled analog of rifampin to optimize treatments for TB meningitis (29). Sequential 11C-rifampin PET in a rabbit model of TB meningitis demonstrated limited and spatially heterogeneous brain penetration that rapidly decreased as early as 2 weeks into treatment (Fig. 2B). Similarly, in pulmonary TB, rifampin exposure was lower in infected lesions and paradoxically lowest in cavitary walls, even though cavities have an extremely high bacterial burden (107 to 109) and thus are a risk factor for transmission (49, 50). These PET data support the ongoing efforts to develop high-dose rifampin-based regimens to treat TB—especially those in privileged compartments (e.g., TB meningitis or pulmonary cavitary TB) with limited and variable antimicrobial penetration (51, 52). Similar studies have been performed to evaluate intralesional concentration of existing or new antimicrobial (e.g., bedaquiline) to optimize antimicrobial treatments (53, 54).

DEVELOPMENT OF PATHOGEN-SPECIFIC IMAGING TOOLS

Current radiopharmaceuticals to image infections rely on nonspecific pathophysiological consequences of infection, such as increased capillary permeability, vasodilation, and hyperemia, as well as adaptation of local metabolism (55). Similarly, while 18F-FDG PET is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of infectious diseases (56), it is not specific for infection and cannot differentiate infection from other disease processes, such as inflammation or cancer. Development of pathogen-specific tracers has been challenging and, in the past, demonstrated variable results. Many pathogen-specific tracers have relied on antimicrobial-derived radiopharmaceuticals (e.g., 99mTc-ciprofloxacin [57]), or antimicrobial peptides with variable results (58), likely due to lack of bacterial accumulation that is needed to reliably detect infections from the background tissues (59).

Bacterium-specific PET imaging.

Mainstay clinical microbiology uses differential bacterial metabolism, such as selective growth media, to differentiate bacteria in the microbiology laboratory (60). Therefore, recent attempts utilizing small molecules selectively metabolized by bacteria but not by mammalian cells hold promise. Ordonez et al. presented a systematic discovery approach to identify and develop novel bacterium-specific PET tracers based on selective metabolism (61). They performed an in silico screen of 961 radiolabeled small molecules followed by bacterial uptake assays of promising candidates and identified several potential bacterium-specific imaging tracers such as para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), which accumulated in all bacterial species tested, d-mannitol, which accumulated selectively in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria but not mycobacteria, and d-sorbitol, which accumulated selectively in Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Yersinia spp., Enterobacter spp., etc.) which is the largest family of bacterial pathogens in humans. Together, these afford a set of tools for the differential imaging of bacteria in vivo.

Several investigators are utilizing this approach to develop bacterium-specific tracers. For instance, maltose and maltodextrin are polysaccharides that are incorporated with high specificity using the maltose-maltodextrin transport system present in multiple Gram-negative as well as Gram-positive bacteria but not in mammalian cells (62). Several generations of tracers have been developed to target the maltodextrin transporter system (63, 64). Most recently, 6″-18F-fluoromaltotriose (65) was shown to selectively accumulate in an E. coli myositis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infection mouse models. Similarly, sorbitol, a sugar alcohol, is selectively taken up via surface transporters, phosphorylated and further metabolized by Enterobacteriaceae (61). In vitro uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol (18F-FDS), which can be easily synthesized from 18F-FDG, demonstrated that the tracer accumulated ∼1,000-fold more in Enterobacteriaceae than in mammalian cells. Moreover, 18F-FDS PET was able to specifically detect and differentiate live Enterobacteriaceae (infected lesion) from sterile inflammation (heat-killed bacteria) in a murine thigh myositis model as well as other animal models of infection (36, 66). Other recently developed bacterium-specific imaging agents include 11C-PABA, 2-18F-PABA, and 18F-fluoropropyl-trimethoprim (18F-FPTMP), which target the bacterial folate pathway (37, 67, 68), radio-analogs of d-amino acids that are incorporated into the bacterial cell wall (69), and siderophore-derived agents (70). 18F-FDS has been administered to humans and found to be safe and well-tolerated (71).

Since successful treatment often leads to rapid killing or inactivation of the pathogen much earlier than the resolution of inflammation or tissue destruction, pathogen-specific imaging also holds promise for the rapid detection of therapeutic responses. Antimicrobial resistance can be identified because the metabolic pathways utilized by many bacterium-specific tracers are highly conserved in susceptible and multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) (61). Therefore, based on the differential response to antibiotics when treating susceptible versus resistant bacteria, many bacterium-specific PET imaging tracers were able to rapidly identify infections due to MDROs without any invasive procedures (Fig. 2C) (36, 37), with potential for clinical translation.

Virus-specific PET imaging.

Attempts have also been made to image viral infections by utilizing antiviral molecules such as acyclovir and its derivatives (72). For example, Buursma et al. used 9-[(1-18F-fluoro-3-hydroxy-2-propoxy)methyl]guanine (18F-FHPG), a derivative of ganciclovir, in which one hydroxyl group is replaced with a radioactive fluorine atom (73). 18F-FHPG is selectively phosphorylated by the herpes simplex virus (HSV) TK and becomes trapped within infected cells. This method was utilized to visualize HSV-affected brain regions in a rat model of encephalitis (73). 64Cu-labeled simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Gp120-specific antibody has also been utilized to study the viral dynamics and localization of SIV in viremic and antiretroviral therapy-treated macaques using PET (38). In viremic macaques, PET signal was detectable in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tract, lymphoid tissues, and reproductive organs. In contrast, antiretroviral-treated (aviremic) macaques had much lower signals but which were still detectable in colon, select lymph nodes, small bowel, nasal turbinates, the genital tract, and lung. In elite controllers, the PET signal was localized to the small bowel, select lymphoid areas, and the male reproductive tract. Novel, virus-specific PET tracers could also be developed by targeting specific metabolic process required for the viral replication cycle (72).

Fungus-specific PET imaging.

Fungal pathogens, including yeast such as Candida sp. and molds such as aspergillosis, cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in vulnerable hosts that are immunosuppressed. However, diagnosing these infections may be challenging because they are particularly difficult to isolate, grow, and manipulate in the laboratory. 99mTc-fluconazole as well as 99mTc-labeled peptides have been utilized to detect Candida albicans infections in mice but not found to be optimal tracers (74). Radiolabeled Aspergillus-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) also hold potential to provide a more specific tool for diagnosis (75). The Aspergillus-specific mouse MAb mJF5 and its humanized derivative hJF5 are directed at the extracellular galacto-mannoprotein antigens produced by all clinically relevant Aspergillus species (76). Administration of 64Cu-DOTA-labeled MAb mJF5 to neutrophil-depleted A. fumigatus-infected mice allowed specific localization of lung infections when imaged with PET (77). Siderophores produced by fungi, such as triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC), which are selective for mold, have also been used as a pathogen-specific imaging strategy for aspergillosis. Sequential PET/CT with 68Ga-TAFC in a rat model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis could detect infection much earlier than conventional technique (78), although no subsequent studies have been reported using this tracer. Recently, Lindeman et al. also reported the use of an advanced MRI technique, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) to measure the extracellular pH of tissues in vivo in murine models (79). While not specific for fungi, they demonstrated that the pH of lung adenocarcinoma lesions were consistently lower than those in the granulomas (lesions) developed due to coccidioidomycosis, suggesting an interesting methodology to differentiate these distinct pathologies that otherwise can present with similar clinical and conventional imaging findings.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION

PET is becoming a routine clinical tool and is proliferating in the United States and abroad, although its application to infectious disease is mostly limited to 18F-FDG PET. For example, 18F-FDG PET in patients with pulmonary TB demonstrated nonresolving and intensifying lesions that correlated with the presence of M. tuberculosis mRNA in patients’ sputa, even following treatment and cure (80). This indicates that even apparently curative pulmonary TB treatment may not eradicate all organisms in many patients, which was a novel finding. In a cohort of patients with multidrug-resistant TB treated with second-line TB therapy for 2 years, quantitative changes in 18F-FDG uptake 2 months after starting treatment were associated with long-term outcomes, offering valuable early prognostic information (81). Similarly, early pathological metabolic activity on 18F-FDG PET, before initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART), was associated with subsequent development of HIV-related immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) after initiation of ART (82).

However, there is need for the development and clinical translation of more specific imaging tracers for infections. For example, 124I-DPA-713, a novel tracer for macrophage-associated inflammation, has recently been translated to the clinic. 124I-DPA-713 PET studies in healthy volunteers demonstrate that 124I-DPA-713 clears rapidly from the lungs, with predominantly hepatic elimination, and is safe and well tolerated in healthy adults (83). Human studies utilizing 11C-rifampin PET to study antimicrobial distribution and optimize treatments for TB meningitis (29) and pulmonary TB (49) have also been performed recently. Bacterium-specific imaging tracers are also being evaluated in clinical studies (71, 84, 85) and could help in establishing specific diagnosis of deep-seated bacterial infections that are not easily amenable to detection by traditional tools, monitor and prognosticate treatments, and optimize antimicrobial treatments. Early and specific detection of infections as well as dual-tracer imaging approaches that could provide accurate data on the class of bacteria causing the infections could help in streamlining empirical antimicrobial choices. Additionally, pathogen-specific tracers could also be used to specifically monitor the presence of viable bacteria and help in determining the treatment duration. Validated tools could also be utilized for precision medicine approaches for patients with complicated infections. Finally, since much of our understanding of infections is derived from animal studies or from biopsy specimen and tissue resection in humans, molecular imaging could enable basic research in humans. Multimodality imaging could simultaneously visualize many different processes (bacterial burden, antibiotic exposure, local microenvironment) and allow integration of cross-species data from animals to humans that is not feasible with current ex vivo tools.

Footnotes

Citation Gordon O, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Ordonez AA, Tucker EW, Jain SK. 2019. Molecular imaging: a novel tool to visualize pathogenesis of infections in situ. mBio 10:e00317-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00317-19.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gambhir SS, Ge TJ, Vermesh O, Spitler R. 2018. Toward achieving precision health. Sci Transl Med 10:eaao3612. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sensarn S, Zavaleta CL, Segal E, Rogalla S, Lee W, Gambhir SS, Bogyo M, Contag CH. 2016. A clinical wide-field fluorescence endoscopic device for molecular imaging demonstrating cathepsin protease activity in colon cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 18:820–829. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-0956-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chung K, Wallace J, Kim SY, Kalyanasundaram S, Andalman AS, Davidson TJ, Mirzabekov JJ, Zalocusky KA, Mattis J, Denisin AK, Pak S, Bernstein H, Ramakrishnan C, Grosenick L, Gradinaru V, Deisseroth K. 2013. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497:332–337. doi: 10.1038/nature12107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jain SK. 2017. The promise of molecular imaging in the study and treatment of infectious diseases. Mol Imaging Biol 19:341–347. doi: 10.1007/s11307-017-1055-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ordonez AA, Sellmyer MA, Gowrishankar G, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Tucker EW, Palestro CJ, Hammoud DA, Jain SK. 2019. Molecular imaging of bacterial infections: overcoming the barriers to clinical translation. Sci Transl Med 11:eaax8251. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aax8251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.James ML, Gambhir SS. 2012. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol Rev 92:897–965. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jelicks LA, Lisanti MP, Machado FS, Weiss LM, Tanowitz HB, Desruisseaux MS. 2013. Imaging of small-animal models of infectious diseases. Am J Pathol 182:296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cherry SR, Jones T, Karp JS, Qi J, Moses WW, Badawi RD. 2018. Total-body PET: maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med 59:3–12. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Weissleder R. 2006. Molecular imaging in cancer. Science 312:1168–1171. doi: 10.1126/science.1125949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hussain T, Nguyen QT. 2014. Molecular imaging for cancer diagnosis and surgery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 66:90–100. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sheikhbahaei S, Werner RA, Solnes LB, Pienta KJ, Pomper MG, Gorin MA, Rowe SP. 2019. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET imaging of prostate cancer: an update on important pitfalls. Semin Nucl Med 49:255–270. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Waaijer SJH, Kok IC, Eisses B, Schroder CP, Jalving M, Brouwers AH, Lub-de Hooge MN, de Vries E. 2018. Molecular imaging in cancer drug development. J Nucl Med 59:726–732. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.188045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hammoud DA. 2016. Molecular imaging of inflammation: current status. J Nucl Med 57:1161–1165. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.161182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Werner RA, Chen X, Rowe SP, Lapa C, Javadi MS, Higuchi T. 2019. Recent paradigm shifts in molecular cardiac imaging-establishing precision cardiology through novel 18F-labeled PET radiotracers. Trends Cardiovasc Med doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jaffer FA, Libby P, Weissleder R. 2007. Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease. Circulation 116:1052–1061. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.647164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lenaerts A, Barry CE III, Dartois V. 2015. Heterogeneity in tuberculosis pathology, microenvironments and therapeutic responses. Immunol Rev 264:288–307. doi: 10.1111/imr.12252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cassat JE, Moore JL, Wilson KJ, Stark Z, Prentice BM, Van de Plas R, Perry WJ, Zhang Y, Virostko J, Colvin DC, Rose KL, Judd AM, Reyzer ML, Spraggins JM, Grunenwald CM, Gore JC, Caprioli RM, Skaar EP. 2018. Integrated molecular imaging reveals tissue heterogeneity driving host-pathogen interactions. Sci Transl Med 10:eaan6361. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan6361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pan H, Yan BS, Rojas M, Shebzukhov YV, Zhou H, Kobzik L, Higgins DE, Daly MJ, Bloom BR, Kramnik I. 2005. Ipr1 gene mediates innate immunity to tuberculosis. Nature 434:767–772. doi: 10.1038/nature03419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Matty MA, Roca FJ, Cronan MR, Tobin DM. 2015. Adventures within the speckled band: heterogeneity, angiogenesis, and balanced inflammation in the tuberculous granuloma. Immunol Rev 264:276–287. doi: 10.1111/imr.12273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Haapanen JH, Kass I, Gensini G, Middlebrook G. 1959. Studies on the gaseous content of tuberculous cavities. Am Rev Respir Dis 80:1–5. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1959.80.1P1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Harper J, Skerry C, Davis SL, Tasneen R, Weir M, Kramnik I, Bishai WR, Pomper MG, Nuermberger EL, Jain SK. 2012. Mouse model of necrotic tuberculosis granulomas develops hypoxic lesions. J Infect Dis 205:595–602. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Belton M, Brilha S, Manavaki R, Mauri F, Nijran K, Hong YT, Patel NH, Dembek M, Tezera L, Green J, Moores R, Aigbirhio F, Al-Nahhas A, Fryer TD, Elkington PT, Friedland JS. 2016. Hypoxia and tissue destruction in pulmonary TB. Thorax 71:1145–1153. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Davis SL, Be NA, Lamichhane G, Nimmagadda S, Pomper MG, Bishai WR, Jain SK. 2009. Bacterial thymidine kinase as a non-invasive imaging reporter for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in live animals. PLoS One 4:e6297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kaushal D, Mehra S, Didier PJ, Lackner AA. 2012. The non-human primate model of tuberculosis. J Med Primatol 41:191–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2012.00536.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Martin CJ, Cadena AM, Leung VW, Lin PL, Maiello P, Hicks N, Chase MR, Flynn JL, Fortune SM. 2017. Digitally barcoding Mycobacterium tuberculosis reveals in vivo infection dynamics in the macaque model of tuberculosis. mBio 8:e00312-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00312-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sugiyama M, Ikeda E, Kawai S, Higuchi T, Zhang H, Khan N, Tomiyoshi K, Inoue T, Yamaguchi H, Katakura K, Endo K, Suzuki M. 2004. Cerebral metabolic reduction in severe malaria: fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging in a primate model of severe human malaria with cerebral involvement. Am J Trop Med Hyg 71:542–545. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2004.71.542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Behr MA, Edelstein PH, Ramakrishnan L. 2018. Revisiting the timetable of tuberculosis. BMJ 362:k2738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Murawski AM, Gurbani S, Harper JS, Klunk M, Younes L, Jain SK, Jedynak BM. 2014. Imaging the evolution of reactivation pulmonary tuberculosis in mice using 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 55:1726–1729. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.144634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tucker EW, Guglieri-Lopez B, Ordonez AA, Ritchie B, Klunk MH, Sharma R, Chang YS, Sanchez-Bautista J, Frey S, Lodge MA, Rowe SP, Holt DP, Gobburu J, Peloquin CA, Mathews WB, Dannals RF, Pardo CA, Kannan S, Ivaturi VD, Jain SK. 2018. Noninvasive 11C-rifampin positron emission tomography reveals drug biodistribution in tuberculous meningitis. Sci Transl Med 10:eaau0965. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau0965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lin PL, Ford CB, Coleman MT, Myers AJ, Gawande R, Ioerger T, Sacchettini J, Fortune SM, Flynn JL. 2014. Sterilization of granulomas is common in active and latent tuberculosis despite within-host variability in bacterial killing. Nat Med 20:75–79. doi: 10.1038/nm.3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Davis SL, Nuermberger EL, Um PK, Vidal C, Jedynak B, Pomper MG, Bishai WR, Jain SK. 2009. Noninvasive pulmonary [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography correlates with bactericidal activity of tuberculosis drug treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4879–4884. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00789-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lin PL, Maiello P, Gideon HP, Coleman MT, Cadena AM, Rodgers MA, Gregg R, O'Malley M, Tomko J, Fillmore D, Frye LJ, Rutledge T, DiFazio RM, Janssen C, Klein E, Andersen PL, Fortune SM, Flynn JL. 2016. PET CT identifies reactivation risk in cynomolgus macaques with latent M. tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005739. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Foss CA, Harper JS, Wang H, Pomper MG, Jain SK. 2013. Noninvasive molecular imaging of tuberculosis-associated inflammation with radioiodinated DPA-713. J Infect Dis 208:2067–2074. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ordonez AA, Pokkali S, DeMarco VP, Klunk M, Mease RC, Foss CA, Pomper MG, Jain SK. 2015. Radioiodinated DPA-713 imaging correlates with bactericidal activity of tuberculosis treatments in mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:642–649. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04180-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tucker EW, Pokkali S, Zhang Z, DeMarco VP, Klunk M, Smith ES, Ordonez AA, Penet MF, Bhujwalla Z, Jain SK, Kannan S. 2016. Microglia activation in a pediatric rabbit model of tuberculous meningitis. Dis Model Mech 9:1497–1506. doi: 10.1242/dmm.027326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Weinstein EA, Ordonez AA, DeMarco VP, Murawski AM, Pokkali S, MacDonald EM, Klunk M, Mease RC, Pomper MG, Jain SK. 2014. Imaging Enterobacteriaceae infection in vivo with 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol positron emission tomography. Sci Transl Med 6:259ra146. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang Z, Ordonez AA, Wang H, Li Y, Gogarty KR, Weinstein EA, Daryaee F, Merino J, Yoon GE, Kalinda AS, Mease RC, Iuliano JN, Smith-Jones PM, Jain SK, Tonge PJ. 2018. Positron emission tomography imaging with 2-[18F]F-p-aminobenzoic acid detects Staphylococcus aureus infections and monitors drug response. ACS Infect Dis 4:1635–1644. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Santangelo PJ, Rogers KA, Zurla C, Blanchard EL, Gumber S, Strait K, Connor-Stroud F, Schuster DM, Amancha PK, Hong JJ, Byrareddy SN, Hoxie JA, Vidakovic B, Ansari AA, Hunter E, Villinger F. 2015. Whole-body immunoPET reveals active SIV dynamics in viremic and antiretroviral therapy-treated macaques. Nat Methods 12:427–432. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Byrareddy SN, Arthos J, Cicala C, Villinger F, Ortiz KT, Little D, Sidell N, Kane MA, Yu J, Jones JW, Santangelo PJ, Zurla C, McKinnon LR, Arnold KB, Woody CE, Walter L, Roos C, Noll A, Van Ryk D, Jelicic K, Cimbro R, Gumber S, Reid MD, Adsay V, Amancha PK, Mayne AE, Parslow TG, Fauci AS, Ansari AA. 2016. Sustained virologic control in SIV+ macaques after antiretroviral and alpha4beta7 antibody therapy. Science 354:197–202. doi: 10.1126/science.aag1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Frieden T. 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Levison ME, Levison JH. 2009. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents. Infect Dis Clin North Am 23:791–815. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Andrews JM. 2001. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations. J Antimicrob Chemother 48(Suppl 1):5–16. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.de Velde F, Mouton JW, de Winter BC, van Gelder T, Koch BC. 2018. Clinical applications of population pharmacokinetic models of antibiotics: challenges and perspectives. Pharmacol Res 134:280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.McKenzie C. 2011. Antibiotic dosing in critical illness. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:ii25–ii31. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Prideaux B, Via LE, Zimmerman MD, Eum S, Sarathy J, O'Brien P, Chen C, Kaya F, Weiner DM, Chen P-Y, Song T, Lee M, Shim TS, Cho JS, Kim W, Cho SN, Olivier KN, Barry CE, Dartois V. 2015. The association between sterilizing activity and drug distribution into tuberculosis lesions. Nat Med 21:1223–1227. doi: 10.1038/nm.3937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang Z, Gogarty KR, Daryaee F, Tonge PJ. 2017. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics relationships, p 195–207. Imaging infections. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gupta N, Price P, Aboagye E. 2002. PET for in vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measurements. Eur J Cancer 38:2094–2107. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00413-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ordonez AA, Bambarger LE, Jain SK, Weinstein EA. 2017. Biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials, p 209–222. In Jain SK. (ed), Imaging infections: from bench to bedside. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ordonez AA, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Chen A, Tucker EW, Sanchez JD, Lodge MA, Shah MR, Holt DP, Mathews WB, Dannals RF, Rowe SP, Ivaturi VD, Jain SK. 2019. Dynamic PET for noninvasive multi-compartment biodistribution of 11C-rifampin in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Abstr GA 324, World Mol Imaging Conf, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 4–7 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.DeMarco VP, Ordonez AA, Klunk M, Prideaux B, Wang H, Zhuo Z, Tonge PJ, Dannals RF, Holt DP, Lee CK, Weinstein EA, Dartois V, Dooley KE, Jain SK. 2015. Determination of [11C]rifampin pharmacokinetics within Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice by using dynamic positron emission tomography bioimaging. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5768–5774. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01146-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ruslami R, Ganiem AR, Dian S, Apriani L, Achmad TH, van der Ven AJ, Borm G, Aarnoutse RE, van Crevel R. 2013. Intensified regimen containing rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis: an open-label, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis 13:27–35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70264-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Velasquez GE, Brooks MB, Coit JM, Pertinez H, Vargas Vasquez D, Sanchez Garavito E, Calderon RI, Jimenez J, Tintaya K, Peloquin CA, Osso E, Tierney DB, Seung KJ, Lecca L, Davies GR, Mitnick CD. 2018. Efficacy and safety of high-dose rifampin in pulmonary tuberculosis. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 198:657–666. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2524OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Weinstein EA, Liu L, Ordonez AA, Wang H, Hooker JM, Tonge PJ, Jain SK. 2012. Noninvasive determination of 2-[18F]-fluoroisonicotinic acid hydrazide pharmacokinetics by positron emission tomography in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:6284–6290. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01644-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ordonez AA, Carroll LS, Abhishek S, Mota F, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Klunk MH, Singh AK, Freundlich JS, Mease RC, Jain SK. 2019. Radiosynthesis and PET bioimaging of 76Br-bedaquiline in a murine model of tuberculosis. ACS Infect Dis doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Goldsmith SJ, Vallabhajosula S. 2009. Clinically proven radiopharmaceuticals for infection imaging: mechanisms and applications. Semin Nucl Med 39:2–10. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Censullo A, Vijayan T. 2017. Using nuclear medicine imaging wisely in diagnosing infectious diseases. Open Forum Infect Dis 4:ofx011. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Vinjamuri S, Hall AV, Solanki KK, Bomanji J, Siraj Q, O'Shaughnessy E, Das SS, Britton KE. 1996. Comparison of 99mTc infection imaging with radiolabelled white-cell imaging in the evaluation of bacterial infection. Lancet 347:233–235. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90407-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Welling M, Stokkel M, Balter J, Sarda-Mantel L, Meulemans A, Le Guludec D. 2008. The many roads to infection imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:848–849. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0695-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sarda L, Cremieux AC, Lebellec Y, Meulemans A, Lebtahi R, Hayem G, Genin R, Delahaye N, Huten D, Le Guludec D. 2003. Inability of 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy to discriminate between septic and sterile osteoarticular diseases. J Nucl Med 44:920–926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mac FJF. 2000. Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria, 3rd ed Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ordonez AA, Weinstein EA, Bambarger LE, Saini V, Chang YS, DeMarco VP, Klunk MH, Urbanowski ME, Moulton KL, Murawski AM, Pokkali S, Kalinda AS, Jain SK. 2017. A systematic approach for developing bacteria-specific imaging tracers. J Nucl Med 58:144–150. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.181792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Boos W, Shuman H. 1998. Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:204–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gowrishankar G, Namavari M, Jouannot EB, Hoehne A, Reeves R, Hardy J, Gambhir SS. 2014. Investigation of 6-[18F]-fluoromaltose as a novel PET tracer for imaging bacterial infection. PLoS One 9:e107951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ning X, Lee S, Wang Z, Kim D, Stubblefield B, Gilbert E, Murthy N. 2011. Maltodextrin-based imaging probes detect bacteria in vivo with high sensitivity and specificity. Nat Mater 10:602–607. doi: 10.1038/nmat3074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gowrishankar G, Hardy J, Wardak M, Namavari M, Reeves RE, Neofytou E, Srinivasan A, Wu JC, Contag CH, Gambhir SS. 2017. Specific imaging of bacterial infection using 6″-18F-fluoromaltotriose: a second-generation PET tracer targeting the maltodextrin transporter in bacteria. J Nucl Med 58:1679–1684. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.191452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Li J, Zheng H, Fodah R, Warawa JM, Ng CK. 2018. Validation of 2–18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol as a potential radiopharmaceutical for imaging bacterial infection in the lung. J Nucl Med 59:134–139. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.195420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sellmyer MA, Lee I, Hou C, Weng CC, Li S, Lieberman BP, Zeng C, Mankoff DA, Mach RH. 2017. Bacterial infection imaging with [18F]fluoropropyl-trimethoprim. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:8372–8377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703109114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mutch CA, Ordonez AA, Qin H, Parker M, Bambarger LE, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Blecha J, Carroll V, Taglang C, Flavell R, Sriram R, VanBrocklin H, Rosenberg O, Ohliger MA, Jain SK, Neumann KD, Wilson DM. 2018. [11C]para-aminobenzoic acid: a positron emission tomography tracer targeting bacteria-specific metabolism. ACS Infect Dis 4:1067–1072. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.8b00061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Neumann KD, Villanueva-Meyer JE, Mutch CA, Flavell RR, Blecha JE, Kwak T, Sriram R, VanBrocklin HF, Rosenberg OS, Ohliger MA, Wilson DM. 2017. Imaging active infection in vivo using d-amino acid derived PET radiotracers. Sci Rep 7:7903. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08415-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Petrik M, Umlaufova E, Raclavsky V, Palyzova A, Havlicek V, Haas H, Novy Z, Dolezal D, Hajduch M, Decristoforo C. 2018. Imaging of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection with Ga-68 labelled pyoverdine for positron emission tomography. Sci Rep 8:15698. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33895-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yao S, Xing H, Zhu W, Wu Z, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Liu Y, Huo L, Zhu Z, Li Z, Li F. 2016. Infection imaging with 18F-FDS and first-in-human evaluation. Nucl Med Biol 43:206–214. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bray M, Lawler J, Paragas J, Jahrling PB, Mollura DJ. 2011. Molecular imaging of influenza and other emerging respiratory viral infections. J Infect Dis 203:1348–1359. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Buursma AR, de Vries EF, Garssen J, Kegler D, van Waarde A, Schirm J, Hospers GA, Mulder NH, Vaalburg W, Klein HC. 2005. [18F]FHPG positron emission tomography for detection of herpes simplex virus (HSV) in experimental HSV encephalitis. J Virol 79:7721–7727. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.12.7721-7727.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lupetti A, Welling MM, Pauwels EK, Nibbering PH. 2005. Detection of fungal infections using radiolabeled antifungal agents. Curr Drug Targets 6:945–954. doi: 10.2174/138945005774912753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Thornton CR. 2018. Molecular imaging of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis using ImmunoPET/MRI: the future looks bright. Front Microbiol 9:691. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Thornton CR. 2008. Development of an immunochromatographic lateral-flow device for rapid serodiagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15:1095–1105. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00068-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Rolle AM, Hasenberg M, Thornton CR, Solouk-Saran D, Mann L, Weski J, Maurer A, Fischer E, Spycher PR, Schibli R, Boschetti F, Stegemann-Koniszewski S, Bruder D, Severin GW, Autenrieth SE, Krappmann S, Davies G, Pichler BJ, Gunzer M, Wiehr S. 2016. ImmunoPET/MR imaging allows specific detection of Aspergillus fumigatus lung infection in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E1026–E1033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518836113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Skriba A, Pluhacek T, Palyzova A, Novy Z, Lemr K, Hajduch M, Petrik M, Havlicek V. 2018. Early and non-invasive diagnosis of aspergillosis revealed by infection kinetics monitored in a rat model. Front Microbiol 9:2356. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lindeman LR, Jones KM, High RA, Howison CM, Shubitz LF, Pagel MD. 2019. Differentiating lung cancer and infection based on measurements of extracellular pH with acidoCEST MRI. Sci Rep 9:13002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49514-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Malherbe ST, Shenai S, Ronacher K, Loxton AG, Dolganov G, Kriel M, Van T, Chen RY, Warwick J, Via LE, Song T, Lee M, Schoolnik G, Tromp G, Alland D, Barry CE, Winter J, Walzl G, Lucas L, Catalysis TB-Biomarker Consortium, Spuy GV, Stanley K, Thiart L, Smith B, Du Plessis N, Beltran CGG, Maasdorp E, Ellmann A, Choi H, Joh J, Dodd LE, Allwood B, Koegelenberg C, Vorster M, Griffith-Richards S. 2016. Persisting positron emission tomography lesion activity and Mycobacterium tuberculosis mRNA after tuberculosis cure. Nat Med 22:1094–1100. doi: 10.1038/nm.4177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chen RY, Dodd LE, Lee M, Paripati P, Hammoud DA, Mountz JM, Jeon D, Zia N, Zahiri H, Coleman MT, Carroll MW, Lee JD, Jeong YJ, Herscovitch P, Lahouar S, Tartakovsky M, Rosenthal A, Somaiyya S, Lee S, Goldfeder LC, Cai Y, Via LE, Park SK, Cho SN, Barry CE III, 2014. PET/CT imaging correlates with treatment outcome in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Sci Transl Med 6:265ra166. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hammoud DA, Boulougoura A, Papadakis GZ, Wang J, Dodd LE, Rupert A, Higgins J, Roby G, Metzger D, Laidlaw E, Mican JM, Pau A, Lage S, Wong CS, Lisco A, Manion M, Sheikh V, Millo C, Sereti I. 2019. Increased metabolic activity on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in human immunodeficiency virus-associated immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Clin Infect Dis 68:229–238. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Foss CA, Plyku D, Ordonez AA, Sanchez-Bautista J, Rosenthal HB, Minn I, Lodge MA, Pomper MG, Sgouros G, Jain SK. 2018. Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 124I-DPA-713, a PET radiotracer for macrophage-associated inflammation. J Nucl Med 59:1751–1756. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.207431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ordonez AA, Plyku D, Klunk MH, Holt DP, Dannals RF, Wilson DM, Jain SK. 2019. Noninvasive imaging of infections using 11C-para-aminobenzoic acid (11C-PABA) as a bacteria-specific PET radiotracer: preclinical and first-in-human studies. Abstr P051, World Mol Imaging Conf, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 4–7 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ordonez AA, Wintaco LM, Ruiz-Bedoya CA, Frey S, Sanchez JD, D’Alessio FR, Ravert HT, Holt DP, Dannals RF, Pomper MG, Jain S. 2019. Noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of pneumonia using pathogen-specific 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol (FDS) PET. Abstr GA 321, World Mol Imaging Conf, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 4–7 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ordonez AA, Tasneen R, Pokkali S, Xu Z, Converse PJ, Klunk MH, Mollura DJ, Nuermberger EL, Jain SK. 2016. Mouse model of pulmonary cavitary tuberculosis and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9. Dis Model Mech 9:779–788. doi: 10.1242/dmm.025643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES