Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2019 Sep 28;5(9):e02449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02449

A new record of the invasive seaweed Caulerpa cylindracea Sonder in the South Adriatic Sea

Andrea Pierucci a,∗, Gina De La Fuente b, Rita Cannas a, Mariachiara Chiantore b
PMCID: PMC6819781  PMID: 31687554

Abstract

The green alga Caulerpa cylindracea Sonder is one of the most infamous and threatening invasive species in the Mediterranean Sea. Since 1985, it started rapidly spreading to all Mediterranean regions causing many ecological changes on natural communities. In the present study, we present an example of this proliferation with the first record in the Marine Protected Area of Tremiti Island (MPATI) in the South Adriatic Sea. Fifteen sites along the coast and 5 different depths have been investigated. Our results provide eveidence of a wide invasion of this pest in three islands, San Domino, San Nicola and Capraia. This study fills a particular data gap in the ongoing biomonitoring of invasive seaweeds in the Mediterranean Sea representing a base line of this invasive species for the MPATI.

Keywords: Environmental science, Ecology, Aquatic ecology, Ecosystem change, Flora, Biological pollutants, Invasive macrophytes, Mediterranean sea, Caulerpa cylindracea, Bioinvasion, Tropicalisation

1. Introduction

Ongoing climate change and impacts related to human population increases, including aquaculture, shipping and transportation are considered important driving forces behind the intensification of biological invasion phenomena worldwide (Streftaris et al., 2005; Occhipinti-Ambrogi, 2007; Schaffelke and Hewitt, 2007; Jauni et al., 2015). The scientific community has highlighted either positive, negligible and negative relationships between native biodiversity and invasions of exotic species (Lonsdale, 1999; McKinney and Lockwood, 1999; Byrnes et al., 2007; Fridley et al., 2007; Stachowicz et al., 2007; Wallentinus and Nyberg, 2007; Rilov and Crooks, 2009 Tamburello et al., 2015). It is however generally accepted that interactions between invasive species and native communities cause biotic and abiotic changes (Levine and D'Antonio, 1999; Ceccherelli and Sechi, 2002; Grosholz, 2002; Kennedy et al., 2002; Arenas et al., 2006; Beisner et al., 2006; Bulleri and Benedetti-Cecchi, 2008; Piazzi and Balata, 2009). Although invasive species affect marine ecosystems at the global scale, the Mediterranean Sea is amongst the most severely affected, with approximately 1000 introduced species, that now represent more than 5% of the known flora and fauna (Boudouresque et al., 2005; Occhipinti-Ambrogi and Sheppard, 2007; Galil, 2008; Zenetos et al., 2012; Gorbi et al., 2014). There is a pressing need to understand the mechanisms regulating species invasions both to predict pathways of invasion and to control their spread (Streftaris and Zenetos, 2006; Anderson, 2007; Gollasch et al., 2007; Hewitt and Campbell, 2007).

The alien green alga Caulerpa cylindracea Sonder is one of the most infamous and threatening invasive species in the Mediterranean Sea (Piazzi et al., 2005a,b; Montefalcone et al., 2015). This species was first found in the Mediterranean Sea along the Tunisia coast in 1985 (Sghaier et al., 2015), being introduced from south-western Australia (Famà et al., 2000; Verlaque et al., 2003; Belton et al., 2014). It was subsequently reported along the coastline of 12 Mediterranean countries. On the Italian coast, this species was first reported by Alongi et al. (1993), followed by the coasts of Greece (Panayotidis and Montesanto, 1994), Albania (Di Martino and Giaccone, 1995), Cyprus (Hadjichristophorou et al., 1997), France (Jousson et al., 1998), Spain (Ballesteros et al., 1999), Tunisia (Belkhiria, 1999), Turkey (Cirik, 1999), Malta (Stevens, 1999), Algeria (Verlaque et al., 2003; Ould-Ahmed and Meinesz, 2007), Croatia (Žuljević et al., 2003) and Montenegro (Mačić and Kašćelan 2006) also within many Marine Protected Areas (Katsanevakis et al., 2010; Felline et al., 2012). The species has been recorded on a variety of substrates and benthic assemblages, between 0 and 70 m depth, in both polluted and unpolluted areas, and proliferated rapidly showing high adaptability to physical stressors (Verlaque et al., 2000, 2003; Capiomont et al., 2005; Piazzi et al., 2005a,b; 2016; Streftaris and Zenetos, 2006; Tsiamis et al., 2008; Cebrian and Ballesteros, 2009; Piazzi and Balata, 2009; Altamirano et al., 2014; Bulleri and Malquori, 2015) displaying a maximum growth rate and yield at 27 °C and 25 °C, respectively, and maintaining an high eco-physiological rates between 25 °C and 29 °C (Sampeiro-Ramos et al., 2015). It can spread by fragmentation (Smith and Walters, 1999) sexual reproduction (Panayotidis and Žuljević, 2001) and its spherical branchlets can also act as propagules (Renoncourt and Meinesz, 2002).

Caulerpa cylindracea exerts negative effects on marine macrophytes (Ceccherelli and Campo, 2002; Raniello et al., 2007), and can alter the behavior of native species, with putative adverse repercussions on patterns of fish growth and population dynamics (Magliozzi et al., 2017). This seaweed can exert relevant effects on composition of sedimentary organic matter (OM), and on the associated microbial populations (Rizzo et al., 2017). There are other well documented negative implications; on alpha diversity of benthic assemblages (Piazzi et al., 2001; Balata et al., 2004; Piazzi and Balata, 2008; Pacciardi et al., 2011); on Carbon turnover in invaded sediments (Pusceddu et al., 2016); on native macroalgal assemblages (Piazzi and Ceccherelli, 2006); and on macrofauna (Lorenti et al., 2011; Cantasano et al., 2017) such as, amphipods (Vazquez-Luis et al., 2008). The aim of the present study is to report a new record of Caulerpa cylindracea in the South Adriatic Sea reporting the magnitude of its invasion in the Marine Protected Area of Tremiti Island (MPATI).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Sampling

The survey was conducted in the MPATI located in the southern Adriatic Sea (Figure 1a, b), founded in 1989. The MPATI is divided into three main management zones (A, B, C). The A Zone is the no entry-no take area and only few scientific activities with specific authorizations are permitted. In the B Zone, anchoring, spearfishing and recreational fishing are forbidden. Scientific activities, navigation, diving and artisanal fishing are regulated by specific authorizations; swimming is permitted. In the C Zone, spearfishing is forbidden, artisanal fishing and scientific activities are regulated by authorizations. Navigation, swimming, anchoring, diving and recreational fishing are permitted.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

a) Updated geographical distribution of Caulerpa cylindracea in the Mediterranean Sea. Black dots denote invaded locations cited in Verlaque et al., (2000); Ruíz et al., 2007; Sciberras and Schembri (2007); Klein and Verlaque (2008); Bouiadjra et al., (2010); Guillén et al., 2010; Rivera-Ingraham et al., (2010); Tsiamis et al., (2010); Bentaallah and Kerfouf (2013); Otero et al., (2013); Altamirano et al., (2014); star with black arrow indicates the new reported presence; b) Map of the MPA of Tremiti Islands with the 15 transects (7 labeled in yellow with presence of C. cylindracea; 8 labeled in white without); and the four alleged pollution sources; Gas station (sky blue triangle Site A); Port of San Domino (green triangle Site B); Port of San Nicola (orange triangle Site C); Water Tanker Vessel (fuchsia triangle Site D). The circle size and color refer to the cover of C. cylindracea as total sum in all quadrats and in all depths of the sites where it has been reported.

Field work was conducted during August and September 2013. Five different depths (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 m) were sampled at 15 sites along the coast of the three islands of MPATI (San Domino, San Nicola, and Capraia) by SCUBA diving. At each depth, 10 random quadrats 20 × 20 cm2 were photographically sampled using a Canon G11 (CanonG11) (Klein and Verlaque, 2008; Baldacconi and Corriero, 2009; Katsanevakis et al., 2010; Cantasano et al., 2017). A total of 730 photos (in San Nicola all 5 depths are not present, see Table 1 and Fig. 2) were taken. Wherever present, thalli of C. cylindracea were scraped off from each quadrat and stored in individual plastic bags. Seawater temperature, seafloor slope and substrate main features were recorded (Tables 2, 3, and 4).

Table 1.

Sites and number of visual quadrats where C. cylindracea was recorded for each island, site and depth. Only the quadrats with C. cylindracea are reported. The cover is reported as cumulative cover surface in m2 and the biomass as cumulative sum of dry-weight biomass in g/m2 for each depth.

Island Site Latitude Longitude Depth (m) Quadrats C.cylindracea(m2) dryweight(g/m2)
SD Cala Zio Cesare 42.10378° N 15.48297° E 5/10 0 0 0
15 6 0.029 23,900
20 10 0.101 68,200
25 10 0.158 157,300
Scoglio Dell’Elefante 42.11045° N 15.49262° E 5/10/15 0 0 0
20 3 0.028 18,400
25 0 0 0
Punta Di Diamante 42.12730° N 15.49037° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Grotta Del Coccodrillo 42.12359° N 15.48668° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Cala Degli Inglesi 42.11872° N 15.48172° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Punta Secca Di San Domino 42.11291° N 15.47351° E 5/10 0 0 0
15 3 0.003 2,500
20/25 0 0 0
SN Testa Di Morto 42.11877° N 15.50503° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Scoglio Segato 42.12296° N 15.51393° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Punta Santa Maria 42.12720° N 15.51814° E 5/10/15 0 0 0
20 2 0.019 13,700
25 3 0.012 9,400
Spiaggia Delle Marinelle 42.12655° N 15.51009° E 5/10/15/20 0 0 0
CA Cala Dello Straccione 42.13094° N 15.50980° E 5/10 0 0 0
15 4 0.025 27,100
Cala Dei Vermi 42.13757° N 15.51910° E 5 0 0 0
10 1 0.005 3,000
15 5 0.04 23,600
20 4 0.021 13,100
25 2 0.027 18,600
Punta Romito 42.14018° N 15.51670° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Grosso di Caprara 42.14044° N 15.51374° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Cala Dei Turchi 42.13593° N 15.50845° E 5/10/15 0 0 0
20 4 0.031 32,000
25 0 0 0
Island Site Latitude Longitude Depth (m) Quadrats C.cylindracea(m2) dryweight(g/m2)
SD Cala Zio Cesare 42.10378° N 15.48297° E 5/10 0 0 0
15 6 2.9 10−2 6 10−7
20 10 0.1 1.7 10−6
25 10 0.2 3.9 10−6
Scoglio Dell’Elefante 42.11045° N 15.49262° E 5/10/15 0 0 0
20 3 2.8 10−2 4.6 10−7
25 0 0 0
Punta Di Diamante 42.12730° N 15.49037° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Grotta Del Coccodrillo 42.12359° N 15.48668° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Cala Degli Inglesi 42.11872° N 15.48172° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Punta Secca Di San Domino 42.11291° N 15.47351° E 5/10 0 0 0
15 3 2.7 10−3 6.3 10−8
20 /25 0 0 0
SN Testa Di Morto 42.11877° N 15.50503° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Scoglio Segato 42.12296° N 15.51393° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Punta Santa Maria 42.12720° N 15.51814° E 5/10/15 0 0 0
20 2 1.9 10−2 3.4 10−7
25 3 1.2 10−2 4.6 10−7
Spiaggia Delle Marinelle 42.12655° N 15.51009° E 5/10/15/20 0 0 0
CA Cala Dello Straccione 42.13094° N 15.50980° E 5/10 0 0 0
15 4 2.5 10−2 6.8⋅10−7
Cala Dei Vermi 42.13757° N 15.51910° E 5 0 0 0
10 1 4.5 10−3 7.4 10−12
15 5 4 10−2 5.9 10−7
20 4 2.1 10−2 3.3 10−7
25 2 2.7 10−2 4.7 10−7
Punta Romito 42.14018° N 15.51670° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Grosso di Caprara 42.14044° N 15.51374° E 5/10/15/20/25 0 0 0
Cala Dei Turchi 42.13593° N 15.50845° E 5/10/15 0 0 0
20 4 3.1⋅10−2 8 10−7
25 0 0 0
Open in a new tab

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

a) Species accumulation curves and b) bar plots illustrating the abundance of C. cylindracea as cumulative cover and standard deviation in all quadrats where it was recorded, grouped by depth and isle; n = number of plots with C. cylindracea.

Table 2.

Sampling sites in San Domino with depth (m); slope and type of substrate expressed as M = mixed; R = rock; S = sand; water temperature (C°); main wind, M = Maestrale (North-West) and S = Scirocco (South-East); presence (+) absence (-) of C. cylindracea (C. cyl) and mean species richness by depth and site.

San Domino
Site Depth (m) Slope Substrate (%)
 T (C°)
 Wind
 C. cyl
 S.R.
M
 R
 S
Cala Zio Cesare 5 L – 20 80 26.1 S – 4
10 M 30 70 – 24.9 S – 5
15 H 50 40 10 23.5 S + 5
20 L – 80 20 22.2 S + 3
25 L 10 80 10 21 S + 4
Scoglio Dell’Elefante 5 H – 100 – 26.6 S – 4
10 M – 100 – 26.2 S – 5
15 M – 90 10 25.6 S – 4
20 L 20 60 20 25.2 S + 4
25 L 40 – 60 24.7 S – 1
Punta Di Diamante 5 M – 100 – 26.8 M – 6
10 M – 100 – 25 M – 6
15 M – 100 – 23.3 M – 5
20 M – 100 – 21.4 M – 5
25 L 60 – 40 18.5 M – 3
Grotta Del Coccodrillo 5 L – 100 – 28 M – 6
10 H – 100 – 26.5 M – 4
15 H – 100 – 25.3 M – 5
20 M 80 20 – 23.6 M – 5
25 L 20 20 60 22 M – 3
Cala Degli Inglesi 5 L – 100 – 28 M – 6
10 L – 100 – 26.5 M – 4
15 L – 100 – 25.3 M – 5
20 M – 100 – 23.6 M – 3
25 M – 40 60 22 M – 2
Punta Secca Di San Domino 5 L – 100 – 26.8 M – 8
10 H 20 80 – 24.6 M – 5
15 H 80 20 – 22.5 M + 4
20 H 30 40 30 20.3 M – 4
25 L 10 – 90 18.2 M – 2
Open in a new tab

Table 3.

Sampling sites in San Nicola with depth (m); slope and type of substrate expressed as M = mixed; R = rock; S = sand; water temperature (C°); main wind, M = Maestrale (North-West) and S = Scirocco (South-East); presence (+) absence (-) of C. cylindracea (C. cyl) and mean species richness by depth and site.

San Nicola
Site
 Depth (m)
 Slope
 Substrate (%)
 T (C°)
 Wind
 C. cyl
 S.R.
M
 R
 S
Testa Di Morto 5 M – 100 – 26.8 S – 6
10 M 20 80 – 24.5 S – 3
15 M 30 60 10 22.2 S – 4
20 M 40 30 30 20 S – 1
25 M 20 20 60 17.8 S – 0
Scoglio Segato 5 M 40 60 – 26.6 S – 1
10 M 10 80 10 24.8 S – 4
15 M 40 40 20 22.6 S – 2
20 M 20 20 60 20.8 S – 1
25 M 40 – 60 19.3 S – 2
Punta Santa Maria 5 M – 100 – 25.9 S – 5
10 M – 100 – 24.7 S – 4
15 M – 100 – 23.9 S – 3
20 M 20 40 40 23.1 S + 2
25 M 20 50 30 22.6 S + 2
Spiaggia Delle Marinelle 5 M – 100 – 26.5 M – 4
10 M 10 90 – 25.9 M – 4
15 L 100 – – 25.4 M – 1
20 L 100 – – 24.8 M – 0
Open in a new tab

Table 4.

Sampling sites in Capraia with depth (m); slope and type of substrate expressed as M = mixed; R = rock; S = sand; water temperature (C°); main wind, M = Maestrale (North-West) and S = Scirocco (South-East); presence (+) absence (-) of C. cylindracea (C. cyl) and mean species richness by depth and site.

Capraia
Site
 Depth (m)
 Slope
 Substrate (%)
 T (C°)
 Wind
 C. cyl
 S.R.
M
 R
 S
Cala Dello Straccione 5 L – 100 – 26.8 S – 5
10 L 10 90 – 25 S – 6
15 L 50 20 30 24 S + 3
Cala Dei Vermi 5 M – 100 – 26.5 S – 4
10 M 90 – 10 25.1 S + 2
15 L 100 – – 24 S + 2
20 L 40 – 60 22.8 S + 2
25 L – – 100 21.6 S + 2
Punta Romito 5 H – 100 – 26.2 M – 4
10 H – 100 – 24 M – 4
15 H – 100 – 22.2 M – 4
20 M – 100 – 20.5 M – 5
25 M – 100 – 18.6 M – 7
Grosso di Caprara 5 H – 100 – 26.4 M – 4
10 H – 100 – 23.6 M – 5
15 H – 100 – 22 M – 5
20 M – 100 – 20.2 M – 4
25 M – 100 – 18.4 M – 4
Cala Dei Turchi 5 L – 100 – 26 M – 4
10 H – 100 – 24.2 M – 5
15 H – 100 – 22.5 M – 5
20 L 40 60 – 20.5 M + 4
25 L 30 70 – 18.8 M – 4
Open in a new tab

2.2. Data analyses

Presence/absence (P/A) of fauna and flora were recorded at the taxa level for all photos. Caulerpa cylindracea percentage cover was estimated with image analysis by Photoshop and SeaScape software. The sampled algae were dried and then weighed. Dry weight was obtained after drying at 60 °C to constant weight. Wind exposure was recorded as mean wind affecting each individual site. As corroborated by the frequency and velocity data gathered by the airport of Foggia-Gino Lisa (Foggia-Gino Lisa), the primary winds blowing across the study area are: Scirocco (South- East) and Maestrale (North-West). The wind direction was associated to each study site based on the site's exposure. The distance of each site from four alleged pollution sources: Gas Port of San Domino, Port of San Nicola, Water Tanker Vessel (Fig. 1b), was calculated as shortest path along the coastline separating the two. Data were analyzed using a constrained correspondence analysis CCA. All data used for this study are provided in Supplementary Tables 1, 2, and 3.

3. Results

Our results show a predominance invasion along the south west coasts of the three islands with a peack of C. cylindracea in Cala Zio Cesare (Figs. 1 and 2 and Table 1). The invasion was recorded in all the three islands (3 sites in San Domino, 1 in San Nicola and 3 in Capraia. Fig. 1b) and in all the five sampling depths except at 5 m (Fig. 1b and Tables 1 and 4). Fifty-seven quadrats reported the presence of C. cylindracea (Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4; Fig. 1b) with a cumulative cover surface of 0.5 m2 and a cumulative sum of dry-weight biomass of 1·10−5 g/m2 for a sampling surface of 2.3 m2, representing a percentage cover of 22%. The most invaded depths were 15, 20 and 25 m. At 15 m depth we reported a wide range of cumulative cover and cumulative sum of dry-weight biomass from only 2.7·10−3 m2 and 6.3·10−8 g/m2 in Punta Secca di San Domino (Isle of San Domino) to 4·10−2 m2 and 5.9·10−7 g/m2 in Cala dei Vermi (Isle of Capraia). The highest cover and biomass were collected in Cala Zio Cesare at 25 m depth, where all the 10 random quadrats presented C. cylindracea with a cumulative cover of 0.2 m2 and a cumulative sum of dry-weight biomass of 3.9·10−6 g/m2. However, only in Cala dei Vermi (Isle of Capraia), C. cylindracea was recorded at all depths except at 5 m (Fig. 1b and Tables 1 and 4). During the sampling, seawater temperature at the five depths ranged between 18 °C (at 25 m of Punta Secca di San Domino, where the lowest abundance was recorded) and 27 °C (at 5 m in Cala Degli Inglesi, where the species was absent).

Species accumulation curves were also produced for each depth, separately for each island. A different pattern emerges in Capraia compared to the other islands (Fig. 2). CCA has been performed on fauna and flora P/A data collected at Capraia, San Domino and San Nicola from 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 m depth. In CCA1 the explained variability is 40% and for CCA2 is 18% (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Constrained correspondence analysis (CCA) on fauna and flora P/A data collected at Capraia, San Domino and San Nicola from 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 m depth. Species vectors are indicated in grey, and species names in black. Environmental variables vectors and names are shown in red. Each point refers to a single replicate quadrat.

4. Discussion

Although, the effect of water motion on this species is unclear and it has been found on exposed shores as well as in sheltered areas (Klein and Verlaque, 2008), C. cylindracea was recorded mostly in sites protected from the main wind, Maestrale (from North West): in 5 out of 7 sheltered sites and in only 2 out of 8 exposed sites (Fig. 1). Our results show two interesting patterns: i) San Domino and San Nicola similarly display a higher species richness (SR) at lower depths (5 and 10 mt) where C. cylindracea was not recorded (Fig. 2); ii) by contrast, the island of Capraia, where C. cylindracea invaded four out of the five investigated depths (10, 15, 20 and 25 m), shows a higher SR distribution at 25 m (Bar plots in Fig. 2). Similar patterns of colonization are reported by Cebrian and Ballesteros (2009) in the Archipelago of Cabrera National Park (Western Mediterranean). Our results show a lower SR in shallow water (5–20 m) associated with presence of C. cylindracea as similarly reported by Piazzi and Balata (2008) on the rocky coast of Tuscany (north-western Mediterranean Sea). Also Baldacconi and Corriero (2009) report a concomitant significant decrease in sponge structure community and cover caused by the spread of C. cylindracea in a nearby area along Apulia coast. In a close area, along the Calbiran Tyrrhenian coasts Cantasano et al. (2017) report as well a gradual decrease of crustose species directly associated with the presence of C. cylindracea.

Contrarily to what reported by Mifsud and Lanfranco (2007), the CCA analysis (Fig. 3) illustrates a low sensitivity to the four anthropic alleged pollution sources (Fig. 2b) and to the seafloor slope. These variables exert a low relevance in the dynamics of this invasive species, while conversely, temperature and type of substrate exert a larger effect, confirming the role of seawater temperature increase in the Mediterranean on the spread of this alga (Argyrou et al., 1999; Ruitton et al., 2005b; Ivesa et al., 2015). Interestingly, although dead matte of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica and rock covered with photophilic algae are often reported as favorable substrates for the spread of this alga (Piazzi and Cinelli, 1999; Piazzi et al., 2001; Ceccherelli et al., 2002; Piazzi et al., 2003; Ruitton et al., 2005a, b; Bulleri and Benedetti-Cecchi, 2008; Katsanevakis et al., 2010; Infantes et al., 2011), in the study area a larger abundance on sand and detrital substrata was recorded (Tables 2, 3, and 4). It is consistent with a recent review by Sghaier et al. (2015) along the cost of Tunisia, who report a higher presence of C. cylindracea on sand substrata instead of rock and P. oceanica meadow (0.68 % of sites observed). By contrast, Piazzi and Cinelli (1999) and Infantes et al. (2011) show a high density of C. cylindracea in shallow waters 0–3 m and <8 m depth, respectively. Moreover, De Biasi et al. (1999) observed a decrease in the C. cylindracea cover from 5–10 m to 15–20 m depth in a different pattern to that reported in MPATI.

Although, many studies show clear effects of this seaweed on benthic communities, and a recent review of Piazzi et al. (2016) underlines ten main direct and indirect factors affecting the spread of this species, many others are still poorly known. For example, the relevance of depth, water movement, herbivores and other invaders in dispersal dynamic of this pest are still not clear. Comparing our data with other studies available from C. cylindracea populations observed in different nearby areas and depths of the Mediterranean Sea, no general patterns can be clearly defined. However, as for C. taxifolia (Boudouresque and Verlaque, 2012) also for C. cylindracea the invasion might be summarized in four main steps: (1) arrival, (2) settlement, (3) expansion, (4) persistence. The expansion process can be very long (Montefalcone et al., 2015; Ivesa et al., 2015) showing that only with long-term monitoring studies coupled with a better ecophysiological knowledge of C. cylindracea and through manipulative experiments, it could be possible to better understand key factors driving the invasion of this species in the Mediterranean Sea.

This first record shows a remarkable presence and distribution of this invasive alien species in the MPATI in different areas, depths and substrates. Additional studies of particular biological interest are necessary to evaluate the spread, invasion speed, and impact of this seaweed. Further monitoring activities will thus improve actual knowledge about the interaction of this seaweed with native Mediterranean communities.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Andrea Pierucci: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Gina De La Fuente: Performed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Rita Cannas, Mariachiara Chiantore: Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Funding statement

This work was supported by the MARLINTREMITI Laboratorio del mare Scholarship (logistic and dive equipment).

Competing interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the MARLINTREMITI Laboratorio del mare and park authorities of the Marine Protected Area of Isole Tremiti. The authors also thank Massimo Ponti, Carlo Cerrano, Giorgio Bavestrello, Stefano Schiaparelli and Danilo Pecorino for valuable comments and suggestions that improved the quality of this paper. A. Pierucci would like to gratefully thank Andrea Magnai, Roberto De Camillis, Nicola Filocamo, Martina Leporatti, Andrea Burini, Federica Montesanto and Giuseppe Suaria for field assistance. Finally, we are indebted with the reviewers, for providing useful and highly constructive comments that greatly improved this manuscript.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the supplementary data related to this article:

Data in brief
mmc1.docx (33.9KB, docx)
Supplementary material
mmc2.docx (16.1KB, docx)
Table1
mmc3.xlsx (57.3KB, xlsx)
Table2
mmc4.xlsx (68.6KB, xlsx)
Table3
mmc5.xlsx (89.3KB, xlsx)

References

  1. Alongi G., Cormaci M., Furnari G., Giaccone G. Prima segnalazione di Caulerpa racemosa (Chlorophyceae, Caulerpales) per le coste italiane. Bollettino dell’Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali Catania. 1993;26(342):9–53. [Google Scholar]
  2. Altamirano M., Andreakis N., Souza-Egipsy V., Zanolla M., De la Rosa J. Vol. 71. 2014. First record of Caulerpa cylindracea (caulerpaceae, chlorophyta) in andalusia (southern Spain) pp. 2–007. (Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid). [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson L.W. Control of invasive seaweeds. Bot. Mar. 2007;50:418–437. [Google Scholar]
  4. Arenas F., Sanchez I., Hawkins S., Jenkins S.R. The invasibility of marine algal assemblages: role of functional diversity and identity. Ecology. 2006;87:2851–2861. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2851:tiomaa]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Argyrou M., Demetropoulos A., Hadjichristophorou M. Expansion of the macroalga Caulerpa racemosa and changes in softbottom macrofaunal assemblages in Moni Bay, Cyprus. Oceanol. Acta. 1999;22:517–528. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balata D., Piazzi L., Cinelli F. A comparison among macroalgal assemblages in areas invaded by Caulerpa taxifolia and C. racemosa on subtidal Mediterranean reefs. PSZNI Marine Ecol. 2004;25:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldacconi R., Corriero G. Effects of the spread of the alga Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea on the sponge assemblage from coralligenous concretions of the Apulian coast (Ionian Sea, Italy) Mar. Ecol. 2009;30:337–345. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ballesteros E., Grau M., Riera F. Caulerpa racemosa (forsskål) J. Agardh (caulerpales, chlorophyta) a mallorca. Bolleti Soc. Historia Nat.s Balears. 1999;42:68. [Google Scholar]
  9. Beisner B.E., Hovius J., Hayward A., Kolasa J., Romanuk T.N. Environmental productivity and biodiversity effects on invertebrate community invisibility. Biol. Invasions. 2006;8:655–664. [Google Scholar]
  10. Belkhiria S. Tunisie. In: United Nations Environment Programme, editor. Vol. 125. MAP Technical Report Series; 1999. pp. 295–296. (Proceedings of the Workshop on Invasive Caulerpa Species in the Mediterranean). [Google Scholar]
  11. Belton G.S., Prud’homme van Reine W.F., Huisman J.M., Draisma S.G.A., Gurgel C.F.D. Resolving phenotypic plasticity and species designation in the morphologically challenging Caulerpa racemosa–peltata complex (Chlorophyta, Caulerpaceae) J. Phycol. 2014;50(1):32–54. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bentaallah M.E.A., Kerfouf A. Prolifération de l'algue Caulerpa racemosa dans les écosystèmes littoraux de l'Algérie: état des lieux et des connaissances. Physio-Géo. Géographie physique et environnement. 2013;7:157–164. [Google Scholar]
  13. Boudouresque C.F., Verlaque M. An overview of species introduction and invasion processes in marine and coastal lagoon habitats. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2012;53:309–317. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boudouresque C.F., Ruitton S., Verlaque M. Large-scale disturbances, regime shift and recovery in littoral systems subject to biological invasions. In: Velikova V., Chipev N., editors. Large-scale Disturbances (Regime Shifts) and Recovery in Aquatic Ecosystems: Challenges for Management towards Sustainability. 2005. UNESCO 85-101. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bouiadjra B.B., Taleb M.Z., Marouf A., Benkada M.Y., Riadi H. First record of the invasive alga Caulerpa racemosa (caulerpales, chlorophyta) in the gulf of arzew (western Algeria) Aquat. Invasions. 2010;5:97–101. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bulleri F., Benedetti-Cecchi L. Facilitation of the introduced green alga Caulerpa racemosa by resident algal turfs: experimental evaluation of underlying mechanisms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2008;364:77–86. [Google Scholar]
  17. Bulleri F., Malquori F. High tolerance to simulated herbivory in the clonal seaweed, Caulerpa cylindracea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2015;107:61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Byrnes J.E., Reynolds P.L., Stachowicz J.J. Invasions and extinctions reshape coastal marine food webs. PLoS One. 2007;3:295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. CanonG11 https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/support/details/cameras/support-point-and-shoot/powershot-g-series/powershot-g11/powershot-g11.
  20. Cantasano N., Pellicone G., Di Martino V. The spread of Caulerpa cylindracea in Calabria (Italy) and the effects of shipping activities. Ocean Coast Manag. 2017;144:51–58. [Google Scholar]
  21. Capiomont A., Breugnot E., den Haan M., Meinesz A. Phenology of a deep-water population of Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Bot. Mar. 2005;48:80–83. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cebrian E., Ballesteros E. Temporal and spatial variability in shallow and deep water populations of the invasive Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea in the Western Mediterranean. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 2009;83:469–474. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ceccherelli G., Campo D. Different effects of Caulerpa racemosa on two co-occurring seagrasses in the Mediterranean. Bot. Mar. 2002;45:71–76. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ceccherelli G., Sechi N. Nutrient availability in the sediment and the reciprocal effects between the native seagrass Cymodocea nodosa and the introduced green alga Caulerpa taxifolia in a Mediterranean bay. Hydrobiologia. 2002;474:57–66. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ceccherelli G., Piazzi L., Balata D. Spread of introduced Caulerpa species in macroalgal habitats. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2002;280:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  26. Cirik S. Turquie. In: United Nations Environment Programme, editor. Vol. 125. MAP Technical Report Series; 1999. pp. 299–300. (Proceedings of the Workshop on Invasive Caulerpa Species in the Mediterranean). [Google Scholar]
  27. De Biasi A.M., Gai F., Vannucci A. Biologia delle Secche della Meloria: considerazioni sull’ecologia di Caulerpa racemosa (Forsska °l) J. Agardh. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 1999;6(1):376–379. [Google Scholar]
  28. Di Martino V., Giaccone G. La dispersione in Mediterraneo di alghe tropicali del genere Caulerpa. Bollettino dell’Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali Catania. 1995;28(349):693–705. [Google Scholar]
  29. Famá P., Olsen J.L., Stam W.T., Procaccini G. High levels of intra-and inter-individual polymorphism in the rDNA ITS1 of Caulerpa racemosa (Chlorophyta) Eur. J. Phycol. 2000;35(4):349–356. [Google Scholar]
  30. Felline S., Caricato R., Cutignano A., Gorbi S., Lionetto M.G., Mollo E., Regoli F., Terlizzi A. Subtle effects of biological invasion. Cellular and physiological responses of fish eating the exotic pest Caulerpa racemosa. PLoS One. 2012;7(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Foggia-Ginosa Lisa. http://www.meteo-allerta.it/it/europa/italia/meteo-foggia-gino-lisa/details/S162611/.
  32. Fridley J.D., Stachowicz J.J., Naeem S., Sax D.F., Seabloom E.W., Smith M.D., Stohlgren T.J., Tilman D., Von Holle B. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology. 2007;8:3–17. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[3:tiprpa]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Galil B.S. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea which, when, where, why? Hydrobiologia 606: 105-116 Gollasch S (2007) International collaboration on marine bioinvasions: the ICES response. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008;55:353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gollasch S., David M., Voigt M., Dragsund E., Hewitt C., Fukuyo Y. Critical review of the IMO international convention on the management of ships’ ballast water and sediments. Harmful Algae. 2007;6(4):585–600. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gorbi S., Giuliani M.E., Pittura L., d'Errico G., Terlizzi A., Felline S., Grauso L., Mollo E., Cutignano A., Regoli F. Could molecular effects of Caulerpa racemosa metabolites modulate the impact on fish populations of Diplodus sargus? Mar. Environ. Res. 2014;96:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Grosholz E. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002;17:22–27. [Google Scholar]
  37. Guillén J., Jiménez S., Martinez J., Triviño A., Múgica Y., Argilés J., Bueno M. Expansion of the invasive algae Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea (Sonder) Verlaque, Huisman & Boudouresque, 2003 on the region of Valencia seabed. Thalassas. 2010;26:135–149. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hadjichristophorou M., Argyrou M., Demetropoulos A., Bianchi T.S. A species list of the sublittoral soft-bottom macrobenthos of Cyprus. Acta Adriat. 1997;38(1):3–32. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hewitt C.L., Campbell M.L. Mechanisms for the prevention of marine bioinvasions for better biosecurity. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007;55:395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Infantes E., Terrados J., Orfila A. Assessment of substratum effect on the distribution of two invasive Caulerpa (Chlorophyta) species. Estuar. Coast Shelf Sci. 2011;91:434–444. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ivesa L., Djakovac T., Devescovi M. Spreading patterns of the invasive Caulerpa cylindracea Sonder along the west istrian coast (northern Adriatic Sea, Croatia) Mar. Environ. Res. 2015;107:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jauni M., Gripenberg S., Ramula S. Non-native plant species benefit from disturbance: a meta-analysis. Oikos. 2015;124:122–129. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jousson O., Pawlowski J., Zaninetti L., Meinesz A., Boudouresque C.F. Molecular evidence for the aquarium origin of the green alga Caulerpa taxifolia introduced to the Mediterranea Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1998;172:275–280. [Google Scholar]
  44. Katsanevakis S., Issaris Y., Poursanidis D., Thessalou-Legaki M. Vulnerability of marine habitats to the invasive green alga Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea within a marine protected area. Mar. Environ. Res. 2010;70:210–218. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kennedy T.A., Naeem S., Howe K.M., Knops J.M.H., Tilman D., Reich P. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature. 2002;417:636–638. doi: 10.1038/nature00776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Klein J., Verlaque M. The Caulerpa racemosa invasion: a critical review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008;56:205–225. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Levine J.M., D’Antonio C.M. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos. 1999;87:15–26. [Google Scholar]
  48. Lonsdale W.M. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology. 1999;80:1522–1536. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lorenti M., Gambi M.C., Guglielmo R., Patti F.P., Scipione M.B., Zupo V., Buia M.C. Soft-bottom macrofaunal assemblages in the Gulf of Salerno, Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy, an area affected by the invasion of the seaweed Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea. Mar. Ecol. Evol. Perspect. 2011;32:320–334. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mačić V., Kašćelan S. Caulerpa racemosa on the montenegrian coast. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Medit. 2006;38:533. [Google Scholar]
  51. Magliozzi L., Almada F., Robalo J., Mollo E., Polese G., Gonçalves E.J., Felline S., Terlizzi A., D’Aniello B. Cryptic effects of biological invasions: reduction of the aggressive behaviour of a native fish under the influence of an “invasive” biomolecule. PLoS One. 2017;12(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. McKinney M.L., Lockwood J.L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999;14:450–453. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01679-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mifsud C., Lanfranco E. Proceedings of the 3rd Mediterranean Symposium on Marine Vegetation, Marseille, France. 2007. Caulerpa racemosa (chlorophyta, caulerpales) in the Maltese islands (central mediterranean) pp. 27–29. [Google Scholar]
  54. Montefalcone M., Morri C., Parravicini V., Bianchi C.N. A tale of two invaders: divergent spreading kinetics of the alien green algae Caulerpa taxifolia and Caulerpa cylindracea. Biol. Invasions. 2015;17:2717–2728. [Google Scholar]
  55. Occhipinti-Ambrogi A. Global change and marine communities: alien species and climate change. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007;55:342–352. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Occhipinti-Ambrogi A., Sheppard C. Special Issue: marine bioinvasions: a collection of reviews. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007;55(7/9):299–401. [Google Scholar]
  57. Otero M., Cebrian E., Francour P., Galil B., Savini D. IUCN; Malaga, Spain: 2013. Monitoring marine Invasive Species in Mediterranean marine Protected Areas (MPAs): a Strategy and Practical Guide for Managers; p. 136. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ould-Ahmed N., Meinesz A. First record of the invasive alga Caulerpa racemosa on the coast of Algeria. Cryptogam. Algol. 2007;28(3):303–305. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pacciardi L., De Biasi A.M., Piazzi L. Effects of Caulerpa racemosa invasion on soft-bottom assemblages in the western Mediterranean Sea. Biol. Invasions. 2011;13(12):2677–2690. [Google Scholar]
  60. Panayotidis P., Montesanto B. Caulerpa racemosa (Chlorophyta) on the Greek coasts. Cryptogam. Algol. 1994;15:159–161. [Google Scholar]
  61. Panayotidis P., Žuljević A. Sexual reproduction of the invasive green alga Caulerpa racemosa var. occidentalis in the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanol. Acta. 2001;24(2):199–203. [Google Scholar]
  62. Piazzi L., Balata D. The spread of Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea in the Mediterranean Sea: an example of how biological invasions can influence beta diversity. Mar. Environ. Res. 2008;65:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Piazzi L., Balata D. Invasion of alien macroalgae in different Mediterranean habitats. Biol. Invasions. 2009;11:193–204. [Google Scholar]
  64. Piazzi L., Ceccherelli G. Persistence of biological invasion effects: recovery of macroalgal assemblages after removal of Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea. Estuar. Coastal Shelf Sci. 2006;68:455–461. [Google Scholar]
  65. Piazzi L., Cinelli F. Developpement et dynamique saisonniere d’un peuplement mediterraneen de l’algue tropicale Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskal) J. Agardh. Cryptogamie. Algologie. 1999;20:295–300. (in French, with English Abstract) [Google Scholar]
  66. Piazzi L., Ceccherelli G., Cinelli F. Threat to macroalgal diversity: effects of the introduced green alga Caulerpa racemosa in the Mediterranean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001;210:149–159. [Google Scholar]
  67. Piazzi L., Ceccherelli G., Balata D., Cinelli F. Early patterns of Caulerpa racemosa recovery in the Mediterranean Sea: the influence of algal turfs. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2003;83:27–29. [Google Scholar]
  68. Piazzi L., Balata D., Ceccherelli G., Cinelli F. Interactive effect of sedimentation and Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea invasion on macroalgal assemblages in the Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine. Coastal Shelf Sci. 2005;64:467–474. [Google Scholar]
  69. Piazzi L., Meinesz A., Verlaque M., Akçali B., Antolić B., Argyrou M., Balata D., Ballesteros E., Calvo S., Cinelli F., Cirik S., Cossu A., D’Archino R., Djellouli S.A., Javel F., Lanfranco E., Mifsud C., Pala D., Panayotidis P., Peirano A., Pergent G., Petrocelli A., Ruiytton S., Žuljević A., Ceccherelli G. Invasion of Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea (Caulerpales, Chlorophyta) in the Mediterranean Sea: an assessment of the early stages of spread. Cryptogam. Algol. 2005;26:189–202. [Google Scholar]
  70. Piazzi L., Balata D., Bulleri F., Gennaro P., Ceccherelli G. The invasion of Caulerpa cylindracea in the Mediterranean: the known, the unknown and the knowable. Mar. Biol. 2016;163(7):161. [Google Scholar]
  71. Pusceddu A., Fraschetti S., Scopa M., Rizzo L., Danovaro R. Meiofauna communities, nematode diversity and C degradation rates in seagrass (Posidonia oceanica L.) and unvegetated sediments invaded by the algae Caulerpa cylindracea (Sonder) Mar. Environ. Res. 2016;119:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Raniello R., Mollo E., Lorenti M., Gavagnin M., Buia M.C. Phytotoxic activity of caulerpenyne from the Mediterranean invasive variety of Caulerpa racemosa: a potential allelochemical. Biol. Invasions. 2007;9(4):361–368. [Google Scholar]
  73. Renoncourt L., Meinesz A. Formation of propagules on an invasive strain of Caulerpa racemosa (chlorophyta) in the Mediterranean Sea. Phycologia. 2002;41:533–535. [Google Scholar]
  74. Rilov G., Crooks J.A. Vol. 30. Springer-Verlag; Herdelberg: 2009. (Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems: Ecological, Management, and Geographic Perspectives). 514-514. [Google Scholar]
  75. Rivera-Ingraham G.A., García-Gómez J.C., Espinosa F. Presence of Caulerpa racemosa (forsskal) J. Agardh in ceuta (northern africa, Gibraltar area) Biol. Invasions. 2010;12:1465–1466. [Google Scholar]
  76. Rizzo L., Pusceddu A., Stabili L., Alifano P., Fraschetti S. Potential effects of an invasive seaweed (Caulerpa cylindracea, Sonder) on sedimentary organic matter and microbial metabolic activities. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):12113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12556-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Ruitton S., Javel F., Culioli J.M., Meinesz A., Pergent G., Verlaque M. First assessment of the Caulerpa racemosa (caulerpales, chlorophyta) invasion along the French mediterranean coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2005;50:1061–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Ruitton S., Verlaque M., Boudouresque C.F. Seasonal changes of the introduced Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea (Caulerpales, Chlorophyta) at the northwest limit of its Mediterranean range. Aquat. Bot. 2005;82:55–70. [Google Scholar]
  79. Ruíz J.M., Ramos A., García R. Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Biblioteca del Centro Oceanográfico de Murcia; Spain: 2007. Informe sobre la presencia del alga tropical invasora Caulerpa racemosa en el litoral murciano en 2006. [Google Scholar]
  80. Sampeiro-Ramos G., Olsen Y., Tomas Marbà N. Ecophysiological responses of three Mediterranean invasive seaweeds (Acrothamnion preissii, Lophocladia lallemandii and Caulerpa cylindracea) to experimental warming. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2015;96:418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schaffelke B., Hewitt C.L. Impacts of introduced seaweeds. Bot. Mar. 2007;50(5-6):397–417. [Google Scholar]
  82. Sciberras M., Schembri P.J. A critical review of records of alien marine species from the Maltese Islands and surrounding waters (Central Mediterranean) Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2007;8(1):41–66. [Google Scholar]
  83. Sghaier Y.R., Zakhama-Sraieb R., Mouelhi S., Vazquez M., Valle C., Ramos-Esplá A., Astier J., Verlaque M., Charfi-Cheikhrouha F. Review of alien marine macrophytes in Tunisia. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2015;17(1):109–123. [Google Scholar]
  84. Smith C.M., Walters L.J. Fragmentation as a strategy for Caulerpa species: fates of fragments and implications for management of an invasive weed. Mar. Ecol. 1999;20(3-4):307–319. [Google Scholar]
  85. Stachowicz J.J., Bruno J.F., Duffy J.E. Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007;38:739–766. [Google Scholar]
  86. Stevens D.T. Malta. In: United Nations Environment Programme, editor. Vol. 125. MAP Technical Report Series; 1999. pp. 279–281. (Proceedings of the Workshop on Invasive Caulerpa Species in the Mediterranean). [Google Scholar]
  87. Streftaris N., Zenetos A. Alien marine species in the Mediterranean-the 100 ‘Worst Invasives’ and their impact. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2006;7(1):87–118. [Google Scholar]
  88. Streftaris N., Zenetos A., Papathanassiou E. Globalisation in marine ecosystems: the story of non-indigenous marine species across European seas. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 2005;43:419–453. [Google Scholar]
  89. Tamburello L., Maggi E., Benedetti-Cecchi L., Bellistri G., Rattray A.J., Ravaglioli C., Rindi L., Roberts J., Bulleri F. Variation in the impact of non-native seaweeds along gradients of habitat degradation: a meta-analysis and an experimental test. Oikos. 2015;124:1121–1131. [Google Scholar]
  90. Tsiamis K., Panayotidis P., Zenetos A. Alien marine macrophytes in Greece: a review. Bot. Mar. 2008;51:237–246. [Google Scholar]
  91. Tsiamis K., Montesanto B., Panayotidis P., Katsaros C., Verlaque M. Updated records and range expansion of alien marine macrophytes in Greece (2009) Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2010;11:61–79. [Google Scholar]
  92. Vazquez-Luis M., Sanchez-Jerez P., Bayle-Sempere J.T. Changes in amphipod (Crustacea) assemblages associated with shallow-water algal habitats invaded by Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea in the western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2008;65:416–426. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2008.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Verlaque M., Boudouresque C.F., Meinesz A., Gravez V. The Caulerpa racemosa complex (caulerpales, ulvophyceae) in the Mediterranean Sea. Bot. Mar. 2000;43:49–68. [Google Scholar]
  94. Verlaque M., Durand C., Huisman J.M., Boudouresque C.F., Parco Y. On the identity and origin of the Mediterranean invasive Caulerpa racemosa (Caulerpales, Chlorophyta) Eur. J. Phycol. 2003;38:325–339. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wallentinus I., Nyberg C.D. Introduced marine organisms as habitat modifiers. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2007;55:323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zenetos Α., Gofas S., Morri C., Rosso A., Violanti D., Garcia Raso J., Cinar M., Almogi-Labin A., Ates A., Azzurro E., Ballesteros E., Bianchi C., Bilecenoglu M., Gambi M., Giangrande A., Gravili C., Hyams-Kaphzan O., Karachle P., Katsanevakis S., Lipej L., Mastrototaro F., Mineur F., Pancucci-Papadopoulou M., Ramos Espla A., Salas C., San Martin G., Sfriso A., Streftaris N., Verlaque M. Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s marine strategy framework directive (MSFD). Part 2. Introduction trends and pathways. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2012;13(2):328–352. North America. [Google Scholar]
  97. Žuljević A., Antolić B., Onofri V. First record of Caulerpa racemosa (caulerpales: chlorophyta) in the Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 2003;83:711–712. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data in brief
mmc1.docx (33.9KB, docx)
Supplementary material
mmc2.docx (16.1KB, docx)
Table1
mmc3.xlsx (57.3KB, xlsx)
Table2
mmc4.xlsx (68.6KB, xlsx)
Table3
mmc5.xlsx (89.3KB, xlsx)

Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES