It has been well established that Env-CD4 complexes expose epitopes recognized by commonly elicited CD4-induced antibodies at the surface of HIV-1-infected cells, rendering them vulnerable to ADCC responses. Here, we show that CD4 incorporation has a profound impact on Env conformation at the surface of viral particles. Incorporated CD4 exposes CD4-induced epitopes on Env, rendering HIV-1 susceptible to neutralization by otherwise nonneutralizing antibodies.
KEYWORDS: HIV-1, Env, CD4, incorporation, virus capture assay, nonneutralizing antibodies, neutralization, cold inactivation, Env conformation, CD4-induced antibodies, HIV-1
ABSTRACT
CD4 downregulation on infected cells is a highly conserved function of primate lentiviruses. It has been shown to positively impact viral replication by a variety of mechanisms, including enhanced viral release and infectivity, decrease of cell reinfection, and protection from antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), which is often mediated by antibodies that require CD4 to change envelope (Env) conformation. Here, we report that incorporation of CD4 into HIV-1 viral particles affects Env conformation resulting in the exposure of occluded epitopes recognized by CD4-induced antibodies. This translates into enhanced neutralization susceptibility by these otherwise nonneutralizing antibodies but is prevented by the HIV-1 Nef accessory protein. Altogether, these findings suggest that another functional consequence of Nef-mediated CD4 downregulation is the protection of viral particles from neutralization by commonly elicited CD4-induced antibodies.
IMPORTANCE It has been well established that Env-CD4 complexes expose epitopes recognized by commonly elicited CD4-induced antibodies at the surface of HIV-1-infected cells, rendering them vulnerable to ADCC responses. Here, we show that CD4 incorporation has a profound impact on Env conformation at the surface of viral particles. Incorporated CD4 exposes CD4-induced epitopes on Env, rendering HIV-1 susceptible to neutralization by otherwise nonneutralizing antibodies.
INTRODUCTION
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) entry, mediated by the trimeric viral envelope glycoproteins (Env), is the first step of the viral replication cycle. The Env trimer is the only virus-specific antigen present on the surface of viral particles; as such, it is the target of neutralizing and nonneutralizing antibodies (nnAbs). Env is a highly dynamic molecule that, upon binding the receptor, CD4, transitions from a “closed” conformation (state 1) to an “open” CD4-bound conformation (state 3). CD4 engagement induces an asymmetric intermediate (state 2) adopted on the pathway to state 3 (1–3). The mature HIV-1 Env trimer is derived by proteolytic cleavage of a trimeric gp160 precursor (4, 5) and is composed of the exterior gp120 and transmembrane gp41 subunits. The gp120 is retained on the trimer via noncovalent interactions with the gp41 ectodomain (6–8). The gp120 glycoprotein is responsible for interactions with CD4 (9, 10). CD4 binding triggers conformational changes in gp120 that promote its interaction with one of the chemokine receptors, CCR5 or CXCR4 (11–18). CD4 binding also induces conformational changes within the gp41 ectodomain (19–22). The conformational transition of the gp41 ectodomain into a six-helix bundle composed of the HR1 and HR2 heptad repeat regions results in the fusion of the viral and target cell membranes (23–25).
CD4 downregulation is a highly conserved function of primate lentiviruses (26, 27). It has been shown that HIV-1 uses different mechanisms to downregulate CD4 from the cell surface (reviewed in references 28–30). HIV-1 uses its Nef, Vpu, and Env proteins to decrease CD4 cell surface expression. Nef is expressed early during the replication cycle and downregulates CD4 from the plasma membrane by directing the receptor to lysosomal degradation (28, 31–35). Vpu is expressed late in the replication cycle from a bicistronic mRNA also coding for Env. Vpu interacts with newly synthesized CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and induces its degradation through an endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) mechanism (36–39). The action of Vpu liberates Env from CD4-dependent retention in the ER (40), allowing trafficking in its unliganded form to the plasma membrane.
CD4 downregulation appears to be important for viral replication at different levels (28–30) and was shown to be important for Env incorporation into viral particles, viral infectivity (41–44), and to avoid reinfection of the cell (26, 45–47). CD4 downregulation also prevents exposure of otherwise occluded CD4-induced (CD4i) epitopes, which are recognized by easily elicited nonneutralizing antibodies (nnAbs) (48). In HIV-1-infected individuals, CD4i antibodies are present in different biological fluids, including sera, breast milk, and cervicovaginal lavages (49–52). Some of these antibodies have been shown to possess potent antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity against cells expressing Env in its “open” CD4-bound conformation (48, 51, 53–56). This “ADCC-susceptible” conformation was recently identified as a fourth Env conformational state named state 2A (57). This new conformation is asymmetric and was shown to be stabilized by a combination of small CD4 mimetics (CD4mc) and two types of CD4i antibodies, anti-coreceptor binding site (CoRBS) and anti-cluster A antibodies. Alternatively, it could be stabilized through Env-CD4 cis interactions. Accordingly, Nef-mediated CD4 downregulation prevented the spontaneous sampling of this antibody-vulnerable conformation at the surface of infected cells (57). This finding raised the intriguing possibility that another functional consequence of HIV-1-mediated CD4 downregulation is to prevent neutralization by otherwise nonneutralizing CD4i antibodies.
Here, using a combination of virus capture assay (VCA), infection, neutralization, and cold-inactivation assays, we have investigated the functional consequences of CD4 incorporation on Env conformation. We report that CD4 incorporation has a significant impact on Env conformation, stabilizing “open” conformational states and increasing the susceptibility of viral particles to neutralization by commonly elicited CD4i antibodies.
RESULTS
CD4 interaction exposes CD4i epitopes on viral particles.
To investigate the impact of CD4 on Env conformation at the surface of viral particles, we adapted a previously described virus capture assay (58, 59). This virus capture assay relies on the binding of HIV-1 virions by anti-Env Abs that are immobilized on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates. The viral particles used in this assay are generated by transfecting HEK293T cells with the pNL4.3 Nef− Luc Env− construct (8, 59–61). This construct is cotransfected with a plasmid encoding HIV-1 Env and a plasmid encoding the G glycoprotein from vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G), resulting in a virus capable of a single round of infection. Virus-containing supernatants are added to the antibody-coated plate, and unbound virions are washed away. Retention of virions on the surface of the plate by anti-Env Abs is visualized by the addition of HEK293T cells that do not express CD4. Infection of the HEK293T cells is mediated by VSV-G and measured by luciferase activity 2 days after infection. A scheme of the assay is depicted in Fig. 1A. VSV-G must be present on the virion in order to allow viral infection and subsequent luciferase expression. If only HIV-1 Env is present and that Env is recognized by the capture antibody, the virions are captured but unable to infect HEK293T cells and, therefore, no signal is obtained (Fig. 1B). Similarly, if only VSV-G is present, the anti-Env Abs are unable to capture the virions and, therefore, no signal is obtained. Only the presence of HIV-1 Env and VSV-G on virions results in a signal when using anti-Env Abs, such as 2G12, which recognizes an exposed glycan-dependent epitope on the gp120 outer domain. Since the epitope recognized by the A32 antibody, which targets the gp120 inner domain, is buried in the closed trimer, it fails to capture the virus (Fig. 1B).
FIG 1.
Depiction of the virus capture assay (VCA). (A) Ninety-six-well plates were coated with anti-HIV-1 Env Abs. Viral particles coding for luciferase and bearing HIV-1 Env and the VSV-G protein were added to the wells. Free virions were washed away, and CD4-negative cells (HEK293T) were added to the wells. After 48 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity measured. (B) Incorporation of both Envs, HIV-1 Env and VSV-G, is required to obtain a signal in this VCA.
Using this virus capture assay (VCA), we evaluated the impact of CD4 incorporation on Env conformation. Briefly, HEK293T cells were cotransfected with pNL4.3 Nef− Luc Env− together with plasmids expressing wild-type (wt) HIV-1JRFL Env or a mutant Env (D368R) unable to engage CD4, VSV-G, and wild-type human CD4 (hCD4) or a mutant CD4 (F43H) impaired in its ability to engage gp120 (48, 62, 63). Released viral particles were collected 2 days after transfection, as described in Materials and Methods. Ninety-six-well plates were coated with anti-HIV-1 Env monoclonal antibodies recognizing the gp120 outer domain (2G12), the V1V2 glycan trimer apex (PG9), CD4-induced gp120 epitopes (17b, A32, C11), the CD4-binding site (VRC03, b12), CD4i gp41 cluster I (F240, QA255.072), anti-HIV immune globulin (HIVIG) (prepared from pooled plasma of asymptomatic HIV-positive donors), and the anti-CD4 OKT4 Ab, which binds to the D3 domain of CD4. Viral particles were added to the plates for 4 h at 37°C, and then the plates were washed to remove unbound viruses. HEK293T cells were added to the wells and lysed 48 h later to measure luciferase activity. Cotransfection of CD4 resulted in its incorporation on viral particles, as measured by the OKT4 antibody. CD4 was able to engage Env in cis as suggested by a small but nevertheless significant decrease in virion capture by the VRC03 and b12 CD4BS antibodies (Fig. 2A). CD4 incorporation also decreased virion capture by PG9, which preferentially recognizes the closed state 1 Env conformation (64). This is expected since CD4 interaction “opens” Env, decreasing the sampling of the quaternary epitope recognized by this antibody (48). The F43H change in CD4, which decreases Env interaction but does not completely abrogate it (62), diminished the effect of incorporated CD4 on VRC03 and b12 binding. As expected, viral particles bearing the D368R mutation, known to abrogate recognition by CD4BS, were efficiently recognized by PG9 but not by VRC03 or b12 (Fig. 2B). In the absence of incorporated CD4, none of the CD4i anti-gp120 antibodies tested (17b, A32, C11) were able to capture viral particles, whereas gp41-directed antibodies did (F240 and QA255-072; Fig. 2C). The lack of binding of gp120 CD4-induced antibodies is in agreement with the occluded nature of the gp120 epitopes that they recognize (48, 57, 65). Strikingly, incorporation of wild-type CD4 but not of its F43H counterpart greatly enhanced the capacity of these antibodies to capture viral particles (Fig. 2C). These results suggest that Env-CD4 interaction on viral particles can lead to exposure of these CD4i gp120 epitopes. Supporting this observation, the Env D368R variant failed to expose these epitopes despite the incorporation of CD4, as measured by effective capture by OKT4 (Fig. 2B and D). In the absence of incorporated wild-type CD4, the gp41 CD4i epitopes recognized by the F240 and QA255-072 antibodies were more available than the gp120 CD4i epitopes (Fig. 2C). More viruses were captured by these antibodies when wild-type CD4 was incorporated; this effect was nullified by the F43H change in CD4 (Fig. 2C) or by the D368R change in Env (Fig. 2D). These results indicate that the incorporation of CD4 into HIV-1 viral particles leads to CD4-gp120 interaction and increases exposure of CD4i epitopes on Env.
FIG 2.
CD4 incorporation exposes HIV-1 Env CD4i epitopes. VSV-G-pseudotyped viral particles expressing HIV-1JRFL Env wild-type (A, C) or an Env variant unable to engage CD4 (D368R) (B, D) were produced together with wild-type human CD4 (hCD4) or a mutant CD4 (F43H) that has decreased affinity for gp120. These viral particles were added to plates coated with antibodies targeting different Env epitopes or the anti-CD4 OKT4 antibody. Free virions were washed away, and HEK293T cells were added to the wells. After 48 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Luciferase signals were normalized to those obtained with the 2G12 antibody. Data shown are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using a paired t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001).
To extend these results beyond the HIV-1JRFL Env, we performed the VCA using viral particles pseudotyped with the HIV-1YU2 and HIV-1BG505 Envs and obtained similar results (Fig. 3A and B). CD4 incorporation resulted in a significant increase in the interaction of several CD4i Abs with viral particles. As expected, CD4 competed with CD4BS Abs for binding, resulting in decreased interaction of VRC03 and b12 with HIV-1YU2. Opening of Env by CD4 also decreased recognition by PG9, an antibody that preferentially binds the closed state 1 conformation (64, 66, 67). The gp41 epitopes recognized by the F240 and QA255-072 antibodies were exposed in the presence of CD4 on HIV-1YU2 more than on HIV-1BG505. This may relate to the differential triggerability of these Envs by CD4. Altogether, these results confirm that incorporated CD4 alters the conformational landscape of Env to sample more open conformations.
FIG 3.
Exposure of CD4i epitopes on additional HIV-1 strains by incorporated CD4. VSV-G-pseudotyped viral particles expressing HIV-1YU2 Env (A) or HIV-1BG505 Env (B) were produced with or without human CD4. These viral particles were added to plates coated with antibodies targeting different Env epitopes or the anti-CD4 OKT4 antibody. Free virions were washed away, and HEK293T cells were added to the wells. After 48 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Luciferase signals were normalized to those obtained with the 2G12 antibody. Data shown are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using an unpaired t test (A) or Wilcoxon paired t test (B) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).
CD4 interaction sensitizes viral particles to cold inactivation.
For some HIV-1 Env isolates, prolonged incubation on ice results in functional inactivation (59). It has been suggested that cold inactivation depends on the ability of the HIV-1 gp120 to sample the CD4-bound conformation (59) and is more efficient for Envs that are prone to undergo conformational changes (68). Accordingly, viral particles bearing Envs in open conformations are more susceptible to this ligand-free inactivation (1), which can be modulated by the V1V2 and V3 variable regions of gp120 (69). To evaluate whether incorporated CD4 affects the susceptibility of viral particles to cold inactivation, we incubated them on ice for up to 24 h. Briefly, HIV-1 virions encoding a luciferase reporter (pNL4.3 Nef− Env− Luc) and bearing wild-type (wt) Env from HIV-1JRFL or HIV-1YU2 were incubated for different amounts of time on ice before being used to infect Cf2Th cells expressing CD4 and CCR5 (70). Luciferase activity was measured 48 h later, as previously described (8). Env-pseudotyped viral particles produced in the absence of hCD4 were resistant to cold inactivation. CD4 incorporation modestly but significantly enhanced virus susceptibility to cold inactivation. This suggests that Env-CD4 cis interaction changes the conformational landscape of Env, resulting in the stabilization of more open and thus cold-sensitive conformations (Fig. 4).
FIG 4.

Incorporated CD4 sensitizes viral particles to cold inactivation. Viral particles pseudotyped with HIV-1JRFL (A) or HIV-1YU2 (B) were produced by cotransfection with or without human CD4. Viral particles were incubated on ice for different amounts of time. At the indicated time points, aliquots were removed and frozen at –80°C. After completion of the longest incubation, all samples were thawed and infectivity on Cf2Th-CD4/CCR5 cells was measured. Data is representative of results from at least three independent experiments, performed in quadruplicate. Data shown are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using an unpaired t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).
CD4 incorporation sensitizes viral particles to neutralization by CD4-induced antibodies.
As our data indicate that incorporation of CD4 into viral particles affects Env conformation, we evaluated whether CD4 incorporation also affected the susceptibility of viral particles to neutralization by ligands that recognize open conformations. We used plasmids encoding full proviruses of the transmitted/founder infectious molecular clones HIVCH58 and HIVCH77, either wild-type (wt) or deleted in their Nef gene (Nef−), to transfect HEK293T cells in the absence of or with different amounts of a plasmid encoding human CD4. By doing so, we generated HIV-1 virion particles enriched in CD4. We used these virions to infect CD4+ CCR5+ TZM-BL cells in the presence of increasing quantities of antibodies. In agreement with previous reports (41–43), we observed that CD4 incorporation decreases viral infectivity (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, CD4 incorporation significantly reduced infectivity of HIVCH58 wt but not HIVCH77 wt viral particles. Thus, HIVCH77 is intrinsically more resistant to the detrimental effects of CD4 incorporation on viral infectivity. This phenotype was modulated by Nef since nef deletion further impaired viral infectivity of HIVCH58 viral particles but also resulted in a significant dose response decrease in viral infectivity for HIVCH77. Nevertheless, under these conditions, a fraction of the viral particles generated in the presence of CD4 remained infectious, allowing us to evaluate their susceptibility to antibodies with different specificities. As shown in Fig. 5B and C, Nef-defective viral particles produced in the presence of the highest ratio of CD4 were modestly but significantly more susceptible to neutralization by pooled plasma from asymptomatic HIV-1-infected donors (HIVIG). Because this phenotype is reminiscent of the neutralization mediated by nonneutralizing CD4i Abs, such as 17b (anti-CoRBS), 19b (anti-V3), and A32 (anti-cluster A), in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of CD4mc (71–73), we then tested the susceptibility of viral particles to these antibodies. Figure 6 shows that low CD4 incorporation, at a ratio of 0.1, is sufficient to render HIVCH58 Nef− and HIVCH77 Nef− viral particles, which bear neutralization-resistant tier 2 Envs, susceptible to neutralization by anti-gp120 Abs 17b and 19b. At this ratio of CD4, HIVCH77 Nef− but not HIVCH58 Nef− viral particles were also susceptible to A32. Intriguingly, higher expression of CD4 restored baseline sensitivity neutralization of Nef-defective viral particles. This could be explained by the impact of CD4 incorporation on viral infectivity (Fig. 5A). As CD4 incorporation increases, viral infectivity is gradually impaired, thus modifying the nature of the pool of infectious viral particles. At higher levels of CD4, incorporated CD4 abrogates viral infectivity; the remaining infectious viral particles might be those that did not incorporate sufficient CD4 to modulate Env conformation, thus explaining why the neutralization goes to baseline. These results suggest that there is a fine balance between CD4 incorporation, loss of infectivity, Env-CD4 stoichiometry, its impact on Env conformation, and neutralization by CD4i antibodies. Nevertheless, the protective effect of Nef in this system can apparently be surmounted, as coexpression of higher quantities of CD4, at a ratio of 0.5, was sufficient to sensitize the wild-type HIV-1CH77 to neutralization by these nonneutralizing antibodies. Altogether, these results indicate that CD4 incorporation enhances the susceptibility of viral particles to neutralization by otherwise nonneutralizing CD4i antibodies.
FIG 5.

CD4 incorporation sensitizes viral particles to neutralization mediated by HIVIG. Full-length infectious molecular clones either wild-type (shown in blue) or Nef defective (shown in red) from transmitted/founder CH58 and CH77 viruses were produced by transfection in the absence (circle) or presence of different concentrations of CD4 (squares or triangles). Reverse transcriptase-normalized amounts of viral particles were used to infect TZM-BL cells. Relative infectivity is shown in panel A. Infectious viral particles of CH58 (B) and CH77 (C) were incubated with the indicated dilutions of HIVIG before infecting TZM-BL cells. Infection levels were expressed as the percentage of the relative light units (RLU) observed in the condition without serum. Data shown are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using a paired t test (A) or an unpaired t test (B, C) (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001).
FIG 6.
CD4 incorporation sensitizes viral particles to neutralization mediated by CD4i antibodies. Full-length infectious molecular clones either wild-type (shown in blue) or Nef defective (shown in red) from transmitted/founder CH58 and CH77 viruses were produced by transfection in the absence (circle) or presence of different concentrations of wild-type human CD4 (hCD4) (squares and triangles). The viruses were incubated with the indicated concentrations of CD4i antibodies 17b (A and B), 19b (C and D), and A32 (E and F) before infecting TZM-BL cells. Infection levels were expressed as percentage of the RLU in the condition without antibody. Data shown are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using an unpaired t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001).
Nef-mediated CD4 downregulation prevents Env conformational changes and neutralization by CD4i antibodies.
Since the HIV-1 Nef accessory protein downregulates CD4 from the cell surface, we evaluated if its expression was sufficient to prevent the Env conformational changes associated with incorporation of CD4 into virions. As described above, the readout of our VCA depends on luciferase expression; in Fig. 1 to 5, we used a provirus that encoded the luciferase gene instead of nef and, therefore, these viruses were Nef defective. To explore the role of Nef, we used a different proviral construct encoding both Renilla luciferase and Nef. In this construct, nef expression is driven by a modified encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) (74, 75). This full-length provirus and its nef-defective counterpart can express HIV-1Bal Env. As expected, Nef expression was required to efficiently downregulate CD4 from the cell surface (not shown). The impact of CD4 incorporation on Env expression was evaluated by VCA as described above. In the absence of CD4, the Env conformation of both Nef+ and Nef− viral particles was similar. The HIV-1Bal Env was poorly recognized by CD4i Abs A32, C11, and 17b. When viral particles were produced in the presence of CD4, Env at the surface of Nef-defective viral particles exposed CD4i gp120 epitopes and were efficiently captured by these CD4i Abs, which is consistent with the efficient incorporation of CD4 (Fig. 7). By contrast, Nef expression limited the exposure of CD4i epitopes upon CD4 incorporation. Altogether, these data suggest that Nef-mediated CD4-downregulation might be a mechanism to protect exposure of vulnerable epitopes recognized by CD4i Abs.
FIG 7.
Nef expression limits the exposure of CD4i epitopes on viral particles. VSV-G-pseudotyped viral particles expressing HIV-1Bal Env coding or not for Nef were produced in the absence or presence of human CD4. Viral particles were added to plates coated with antibodies targeting different CD4i epitopes or the anti-CD4 OKT4 antibody. Free virions were washed away, and HEK293T cells were added to the wells. After 48 h, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Luciferase signals were normalized to those obtained with the 2G12 antibody. Data shown are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney unpaired t test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
The presence of receptor molecules on the infected cell surface can present problems for enveloped viruses, leading to viral strategies to minimize potential detrimental effects on virus replication. For example, sialic acid serves as the receptor for the influenza virus and is bound by its hemagglutinin (HA) protein. Sialic acid is present on many glycoproteins, but influenza neuraminidase (NA) removes it. If the viral neuraminidase is inactivated, influenza aggregates at the cell surface (76) but also HA conformational changes required for fusion are restricted, leading to premature HA inactivation (77).
HIV-1 also put in place different mechanisms to downregulate its receptor from the cell surface. This function is highly conserved among primate lentiviruses (27) and appears to be important for viral replication in T cells (43, 78). Downregulation of CD4 from the surface of infected cells positively impacts viral pathogenesis by virtue of multiple effects. CD4 downregulation has been shown to enhance viral infectivity by facilitating gp120 incorporation (41–44). CD4 downregulation also prevents superinfection and may facilitate the release of viral particles from the infected cell (26, 45–47). CD4 downregulation may weaken the antiviral immune response by limiting CD4 interaction with the major histocompatibility complex class II, which is involved in T cell activation (79).
Another plausible reason to remove CD4 from the cell surface is to limit Env-CD4 interactions which otherwise expose CD4i epitopes recognized by commonly elicited CD4i ADCC-mediating antibodies (reviewed in references 80, 81). It is well established that Envs from primary HIV-1 isolates intrinsically resist sampling the conformations recognized by CD4i Abs. This resistance is likely due to the stability of state 1 in primary Envs, which rarely make spontaneous transitions to conformations recognized by CD4i Abs (2). Soluble CD4 (sCD4) or CD4mc engagement also drive Env into the more open states 2 and 3, rendering them susceptible to CD4i Abs (1, 48, 51, 54, 73, 82). Interestingly, CD4 incorporation into viral particles was recently shown to stabilize more open Env conformations, including state 2A, which is vulnerable to antibody attack (57).
The asymmetric state 2A conformation is characterized by the exposure of gp120 inner domain cluster A epitopes (57). A32 and C11 are well-characterized anti-cluster A antibodies (8, 83–85). These antibodies failed to capture viral particles bearing different primary Env unless CD4 was incorporated. Using our VCA, we found that CD4 incorporation into viral particles had a significant impact on the conformational equilibrium of four different primary Envs. Indeed, CD4 incorporation facilitated virus capture by antibodies targeting different CD4i Abs located in the V3, CoRBS, cluster A, and gp41 cluster I regions. Exposure of these epitopes was also accompanied by enhanced neutralization sensitivity to different CD4i Abs, such as 17b, 19b, and A32. It is therefore tempting to speculate that Nef-mediated CD4 downregulation represents a viral mechanism to avoid exposure of vulnerable CD4i epitopes at the surface of viral particles. Importantly, these above-mentioned effects were reduced in the presence of Nef, further demonstrating the crucial role of CD4 downregulation in avoiding immune responses. Altogether, our results suggest that targeting the ability of Nef to downregulate CD4 or strategies aimed at modifying Env conformation to expose CD4i epitopes could have therapeutic utility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and plasmids.
HEK293T human embryonic kidney and Cf2Th canine thymocytes (American Type Culture Collection) were grown at 37°C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen) containing 5% fetal bovine serum (Sigma), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Mediatech, Inc.). Cf2Th cells stably expressing human CD4 and CCR5 (70) were grown in medium supplemented with 0.4 mg/ml of G418 (Invitrogen) and 0.2 mg/ml of hygromycin B (Roche Diagnostics). The E168K mutation was introduced into the previously described pcDNA3.1-expressing codon-optimized HIV-1JRFL envelope glycoproteins (1) using the QuikChange II XL site-directed mutagenesis protocol (Stratagene). Other plasmids used to transfect HEK293T cells include pcDNA3.1 human CD4 expressor and its F43H variant (48).
Virus capture assay.
Viral particles were produced by transfecting 2 × 106 HEK293T cells with pNL4.3 Luc Env− (3.5 μg), HIV-1 Env (3.5 μg), and VSV-G (1 μg) using standard calcium phosphate protocol. Forty-eight hours later, supernatant-containing virions were collected and cell debris was removed by centrifugation (1,500 rpm for 10 min). To immobilize antibodies on ELISA plates, white MaxiSorp ELISA plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were incubated with 5 μg/ml of the different antibodies in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. Unbound antibodies were removed by washing twice the plates with PBS. Plates were subsequently blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature. After two washes with PBS, 200 μl of virus-containing supernatant was added to the wells. After 4 to 6 h incubation, virions were removed and the wells were washed with PBS 3 times. Viral capture by any given antibody was visualized by adding HEK293T cells (10 × 104) in full DMEM medium per well. Forty-eight hours postinfection, cells were lysed by the addition of 30 μl of passive lysis buffer (Promega) and three freeze-thaw cycles. An LB 941 TriStar luminometer (Berthold Technologies) was used to measure the luciferase activity of each well after the addition of 100 μl of luciferin buffer (15 mM MgSO4, 15 mM KPO4 [pH 7.8], 1 mM ATP, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and 50 μl of 1 mM d-luciferin potassium salt (Prolume).
Antibodies.
The following antibodies were used: anti-HIV-1 gp120 MAbs recognizing gp120 outer domain (2G12) (NIH AIDS Reagent Program), the V1V2 glycan trimer apex (PG9) (Polymun), CD4-induced gp120 epitopes (17b, A32, C11) (NIH AIDS Reagent Program), the CD4-binding site (VRC03, b12), CD4i gp41 cluster I (F240, QA255.072 [86]), anti-HIV immune globulin (HIVIG, prepared from pooled plasma of asymptomatic, HIV-positive donors obtained from the NIH AIDS Reagent Program), and the anti-CD4 OKT4 Ab which binds to the D3 domain of CD4 (Invitrogen).
Virus neutralization.
CH58 and CH77 transmitted/founder infectious molecular clones of HIV-1 were produced by calcium phosphate transfection of HEK293T cells together with an expressor of CD4 wt at a weight ratio of 1 provirus/0.1 CD4 or 1 provirus/0.5 CD4. Two days after transfection, the cell supernatants were harvested. The reverse transcriptase activities of all virus preparations were measured, as described previously (87). Each virus preparation was used immediately and was never frozen. Twenty-four hours before infection, TZM-bl cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells/well in 96-well luminometer-compatible tissue culture white plates (Perkin Elmer). Luciferase-expressing viruses (10,000 reverse transcriptase units) were incubated for 1 h at 37°C with serial dilutions of Env ligands in a volume of 200 μl. The recombinant viruses were then incubated in quadruplicate with TZM-bl cells. After a 48-h incubation at 37°C, the medium was removed from each well, and the cells were lysed by the addition of 30 μl of passive lysis buffer (Promega) and three freeze-thaw cycles. After the addition of 100 μl of luciferin buffer (15 mM MgSO4, 15 mM KPO4 [pH 7.8], 1 mM ATP, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and 50 μl of 1 mM d-luciferin potassium salt (Prolume), the luciferase activity in each well was measured with an EG&G Berthold microplate luminometer LB 96V.
Cold-inactivation assay.
To assess the effect of cold on virus infectivity, virus preparations equalized for reverse transcriptase activity were incubated on ice for 0, 8, or 24 h, as described (69). At the end of the incubation, aliquots were removed and transferred to a –80°C freezer until infection. To measure the infectivity of the virus, aliquots were thawed at 37°C just before infection of Cf2Th-CD4/CCR5 cells in quadruplicate.
Statistical analyses.
Statistics were analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 6.01 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Every data set was tested for statistical normality, and this information was used to apply the appropriate (parametric or nonparametric) statistical test. P values of <0.05 were considered significant; significance values are indicated as follows: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Julie Overbaugh for the anti-gp41 QA255-072 antibody and for helpful discussions and Christina Ochsenbauer for the pNL4.3 IRES Bal infectious molecular clones.
This work was supported by CIHR foundation grant no. 352417 to A.F. and by NIH grants R01 AI129769 to M.P. and A.F., R01 AI116274 to M.P., P01 AI150471 to A.F. and J.S., and AI124902 and AI145547 to J.S. A.F. is the recipient of a Canada Research Chair on Retroviral Entry no. RCHS0235 950-232424. S.D. is a recipient of an FRQS postdoctoral fellowship.
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University, U.S. Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.
REFERENCES
- 1.Herschhorn A, Ma X, Gu C, Ventura JD, Castillo-Menendez L, Melillo B, Terry DS, Smith AB III, Blanchard SC, Munro JB, Mothes W, Finzi A, Sodroski J. 2016. Release of gp120 restraints leads to an entry-competent intermediate state of the HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins. mBio 7:e01598-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01598-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Munro JB, Gorman J, Ma X, Zhou Z, Arthos J, Burton DR, Koff WC, Courter JR, Smith AB III, Kwong PD, Blanchard SC, Mothes W. 2014. Conformational dynamics of single HIV-1 envelope trimers on the surface of native virions. Science 346:759–763. doi: 10.1126/science.1254426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ma X, Lu M, Gorman J, Terry DS, Hong X, Zhou Z, Zhao H, Altman RB, Arthos J, Blanchard SC, Kwong PD, Munro JB, Mothes W. 2018. HIV-1 Env trimer opens through an asymmetric intermediate in which individual protomers adopt distinct conformations. Elife 7:e34271. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Allan JS, Coligan JE, Barin F, McLane MF, Sodroski JG, Rosen CA, Haseltine WA, Lee TH, Essex M. 1985. Major glycoprotein antigens that induce antibodies in AIDS patients are encoded by HTLV-III. Science 228:1091–1094. doi: 10.1126/science.2986290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Robey WG, Safai B, Oroszlan S, Arthur LO, Gonda MA, Gallo RC, Fischinger PJ. 1985. Characterization of envelope and core structural gene products of HTLV-III with sera from AIDS patients. Science 228:593–595. doi: 10.1126/science.2984774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Helseth E, Olshevsky U, Furman C, Sodroski J. 1991. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein regions important for association with the gp41 transmembrane glycoprotein. J Virol 65:2119–2123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang X, Mahony E, Holm GH, Kassa A, Sodroski J. 2003. Role of the gp120 inner domain beta-sandwich in the interaction between the human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein subunits. Virology 313:117–125. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00273-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Finzi A, Xiang SH, Pacheco B, Wang L, Haight J, Kassa A, Danek B, Pancera M, Kwong PD, Sodroski J. 2010. Topological layers in the HIV-1 gp120 inner domain regulate gp41 interaction and CD4-triggered conformational transitions. Mol Cell 37:656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dalgleish AG, Beverley PC, Clapham PR, Crawford DH, Greaves MF, Weiss RA. 1984. The CD4 (T4) antigen is an essential component of the receptor for the AIDS retrovirus. Nature 312:763–767. doi: 10.1038/312763a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Klatzmann D, Champagne E, Chamaret S, Gruest J, Guetard D, Hercend T, Gluckman JC, Montagnier L. 1984. T-lymphocyte T4 molecule behaves as the receptor for human retrovirus LAV. Nature 312:767–768. doi: 10.1038/312767a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alkhatib G, Combadiere C, Broder CC, Feng Y, Kennedy PE, Murphy PM, Berger EA. 1996. CC CKR5: a RANTES, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science 272:1955–1958. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5270.1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choe H, Farzan M, Sun Y, Sullivan N, Rollins B, Ponath PD, Wu L, Mackay CR, LaRosa G, Newman W, Gerard N, Gerard C, Sodroski J. 1996. The beta-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell 85:1135–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81313-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Deng H, Liu R, Ellmeier W, Choe S, Unutmaz D, Burkhart M, Di Marzio P, Marmon S, Sutton RE, Hill CM, Davis CB, Peiper SC, Schall TJ, Littman DR, Landau NR. 1996. Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature 381:661–666. doi: 10.1038/381661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Doranz BJ, Rucker J, Yi Y, Smyth RJ, Samson M, Peiper SC, Parmentier M, Collman RG, Doms RW. 1996. A dual-tropic primary HIV-1 isolate that uses fusin and the beta-chemokine receptors CKR-5, CKR-3, and CKR-2b as fusion cofactors. Cell 85:1149–1158. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81314-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dragic T, Litwin V, Allaway GP, Martin SR, Huang Y, Nagashima KA, Cayanan C, Maddon PJ, Koup RA, Moore JP, Paxton WA. 1996. HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5. Nature 381:667–673. doi: 10.1038/381667a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Feng Y, Broder CC, Kennedy PE, Berger EA. 1996. HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science 272:872–877. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5263.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu L, Gerard NP, Wyatt R, Choe H, Parolin C, Ruffing N, Borsetti A, Cardoso AA, Desjardin E, Newman W, Gerard C, Sodroski J. 1996. CD4-induced interaction of primary HIV-1 gp120 glycoproteins with the chemokine receptor CCR-5. Nature 384:179–183. doi: 10.1038/384179a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Trkola A, Dragic T, Arthos J, Binley JM, Olson WC, Allaway GP, Cheng-Mayer C, Robinson J, Maddon PJ, Moore JP. 1996. CD4-dependent, antibody-sensitive interactions between HIV-1 and its co-receptor CCR-5. Nature 384:184–187. doi: 10.1038/384184a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Furuta RA, Wild CT, Weng Y, Weiss CD. 1998. Capture of an early fusion-active conformation of HIV-1 gp41. Nat Struct Biol 5:276–279. doi: 10.1038/nsb0498-276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.He Y, Vassell R, Zaitseva M, Nguyen N, Yang Z, Weng Y, Weiss CD. 2003. Peptides trap the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein fusion intermediate at two sites. J Virol 77:1666–1671. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.3.1666-1671.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Koshiba T, Chan DC. 2003. The prefusogenic intermediate of HIV-1 gp41 contains exposed C-peptide regions. J Biol Chem 278:7573–7579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211154200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Si Z, Madani N, Cox JM, Chruma JJ, Klein JC, Schon A, Phan N, Wang L, Biorn AC, Cocklin S, Chaiken I, Freire E, Smith AB III, Sodroski JG. 2004. Small-molecule inhibitors of HIV-1 entry block receptor-induced conformational changes in the viral envelope glycoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:5036–5041. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307953101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chan DC, Fass D, Berger JM, Kim PS. 1997. Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein. Cell 89:263–273. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lu M, Blacklow SC, Kim PS. 1995. A trimeric structural domain of the HIV-1 transmembrane glycoprotein. Nat Struct Biol 2:1075–1082. doi: 10.1038/nsb1295-1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Weissenhorn W, Dessen A, Harrison SC, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. 1997. Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41. Nature 387:426–430. doi: 10.1038/387426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wildum S, Schindler M, Munch J, Kirchhoff F. 2006. Contribution of Vpu, Env, and Nef to CD4 down-modulation and resistance of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected T cells to superinfection. J Virol 80:8047–8059. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00252-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schindler M, Munch J, Kutsch O, Li H, Santiago ML, Bibollet-Ruche F, Muller-Trutwin MC, Novembre FJ, Peeters M, Courgnaud V, Bailes E, Roques P, Sodora DL, Silvestri G, Sharp PM, Hahn BH, Kirchhoff F. 2006. Nef-mediated suppression of T cell activation was lost in a lentiviral lineage that gave rise to HIV-1. Cell 125:1055–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Piguet V, Schwartz O, Le Gall S, Trono D. 1999. The downregulation of CD4 and MHC-I by primate lentiviruses: a paradigm for the modulation of cell surface receptors. Immunol Rev 168:51–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1999.tb01282.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lama J. 2003. The physiological relevance of CD4 receptor down-modulation during HIV infection. Curr HIV Res 1:167–184. doi: 10.2174/1570162033485276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lindwasser OW, Chaudhuri R, Bonifacino JS. 2007. Mechanisms of CD4 downregulation by the Nef and Vpu proteins of primate immunodeficiency viruses. Curr Mol Med 7:171–184. doi: 10.2174/156652407780059177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aiken C, Konner J, Landau NR, Lenburg ME, Trono D. 1994. Nef induces CD4 endocytosis: requirement for a critical dileucine motif in the membrane-proximal CD4 cytoplasmic domain. Cell 76:853–864. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90360-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bresnahan PA, Yonemoto W, Ferrell S, Williams-Herman D, Geleziunas R, Greene WC. 1998. A dileucine motif in HIV-1 Nef acts as an internalization signal for CD4 downregulation and binds the AP-1 clathrin adaptor. Curr Biol 8:1235–1238. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00517-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Craig HM, Pandori MW, Guatelli JC. 1998. Interaction of HIV-1 Nef with the cellular dileucine-based sorting pathway is required for CD4 down-regulation and optimal viral infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:11229–11234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Greenberg M, DeTulleo L, Rapoport I, Skowronski J, Kirchhausen T. 1998. A dileucine motif in HIV-1 Nef is essential for sorting into clathrin-coated pits and for downregulation of CD4. Curr Biol 8:1239–1242. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00518-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mangasarian A, Foti M, Aiken C, Chin D, Carpentier JL, Trono D. 1997. The HIV-1 Nef protein acts as a connector with sorting pathways in the Golgi and at the plasma membrane. Immunity 6:67–77. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80243-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Magadan JG, Perez-Victoria FJ, Sougrat R, Ye Y, Strebel K, Bonifacino JS. 2010. Multilayered mechanism of CD4 downregulation by HIV-1 Vpu involving distinct ER retention and ERAD targeting steps. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000869. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Willey RL, Maldarelli F, Martin MA, Strebel K. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein induces rapid degradation of CD4. J Virol 66:7193–7200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Willey RL, Maldarelli F, Martin MA, Strebel K. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein regulates the formation of intracellular gp160-CD4 complexes. J Virol 66:226–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoxie JA, Alpers JD, Rackowski JL, Huebner K, Haggarty BS, Cedarbaum AJ, Reed JC. 1986. Alterations in T4 (CD4) protein and mRNA synthesis in cells infected with HIV. Science 234:1123–1127. doi: 10.1126/science.3095925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kimura T, Nishikawa M, Ohyama A. 1994. Intracellular membrane traffic of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins: Vpu liberates Golgi-targeted gp160 from CD4-dependent retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biochem 115:1010–1020. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a124414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pham HM, Arganaraz ER, Groschel B, Trono D, Lama J. 2004. Lentiviral vectors interfering with virus-induced CD4 down-modulation potently block human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in primary lymphocytes. J Virol 78:13072–13081. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13072-13081.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lama J, Mangasarian A, Trono D. 1999. Cell-surface expression of CD4 reduces HIV-1 infectivity by blocking Env incorporation in a Nef- and Vpu-inhibitable manner. Curr Biol 9:622–631. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80284-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lundquist CA, Zhou J, Aiken C. 2004. Nef stimulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in primary T cells by enhancing virion-associated gp120 levels: coreceptor-dependent requirement for Nef in viral replication. J Virol 78:6287–6296. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.12.6287-6296.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tanaka M, Ueno T, Nakahara T, Sasaki K, Ishimoto A, Sakai H. 2003. Downregulation of CD4 is required for maintenance of viral infectivity of HIV-1. Virology 311:316–325. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6822(03)00126-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Benson RE, Sanfridson A, Ottinger JS, Doyle C, Cullen BR. 1993. Downregulation of cell-surface CD4 expression by simian immunodeficiency virus Nef prevents viral super infection. J Exp Med 177:1561–1566. doi: 10.1084/jem.177.6.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Le Guern M, Levy JA. 1992. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 can superinfect HIV-2-infected cells: pseudotype virions produced with expanded cellular host range. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:363–367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.1.363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Michel N, Allespach I, Venzke S, Fackler OT, Keppler OT. 2005. The Nef protein of human immunodeficiency virus establishes superinfection immunity by a dual strategy to downregulate cell-surface CCR5 and CD4. Curr Biol 15:714–723. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Veillette M, Desormeaux A, Medjahed H, Gharsallah NE, Coutu M, Baalwa J, Guan Y, Lewis G, Ferrari G, Hahn BH, Haynes BF, Robinson JE, Kaufmann DE, Bonsignori M, Sodroski J, Finzi A. 2014. Interaction with cellular CD4 exposes HIV-1 envelope epitopes targeted by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J Virol 88:2633–2644. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03230-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alsahafi N, Ding S, Richard J, Markle T, Brassard N, Walker B, Lewis GK, Kaufmann DE, Brockman MA, Finzi A. 2016. Nef proteins from HIV-1 elite controllers are inefficient at preventing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. J Virol 90:2993–3002. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02973-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Richard J, Veillette M, Brassard N, Iyer SS, Roger M, Martin L, Pazgier M, Schon A, Freire E, Routy JP, Smith AB III, Park J, Jones DM, Courter JR, Melillo BN, Kaufmann DE, Hahn BH, Permar SR, Haynes BF, Madani N, Sodroski JG, Finzi A. 2015. CD4 mimetics sensitize HIV-1-infected cells to ADCC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E2687–E2694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1506755112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Veillette M, Coutu M, Richard J, Batraville LA, Dagher O, Bernard N, Tremblay C, Kaufmann DE, Roger M, Finzi A. 2015. The HIV-1 gp120 CD4-bound conformation is preferentially targeted by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity-mediating antibodies in sera from HIV-1-infected individuals. J Virol 89:545–551. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02868-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Batraville LA, Richard J, Veillette M, Labbe AC, Alary M, Guedou F, Kaufmann DE, Poudrier J, Finzi A, Roger M. 2014. Short communication: anti-HIV-1 envelope immunoglobulin Gs in blood and cervicovaginal samples of Beninese commercial sex workers. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 30:1145–1149. doi: 10.1089/aid.2014.0163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ding S, Veillette M, Coutu M, Prevost J, Scharf L, Bjorkman PJ, Ferrari G, Robinson JE, Sturzel C, Hahn BH, Sauter D, Kirchhoff F, Lewis GK, Pazgier M, Finzi A. 2016. A highly conserved residue of the HIV-1 gp120 inner domain is important for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity responses mediated by anti-cluster A antibodies. J Virol 90:2127–2134. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02779-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Prevost J, Richard J, Ding S, Pacheco B, Charlebois R, Hahn BH, Kaufmann DE, Finzi A. 2018. Envelope glycoproteins sampling states 2/3 are susceptible to ADCC by sera from HIV-1-infected individuals. Virology 515:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Prevost J, Richard J, Medjahed H, Alexander A, Jones J, Kappes JC, Ochsenbauer C, Finzi A. 2018. Incomplete downregulation of CD4 expression affects HIV-1 Env conformation and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity responses. J Virol 92:e00484-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00484-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Anand SP, Prevost J, Baril S, Richard J, Medjahed H, Chapleau JP, Tolbert WD, Kirk S, Smith AB III, Wines BD, Kent SJ, Hogarth PM, Parsons MS, Pazgier M, Finzi A. 2019. Two families of Env antibodies efficiently engage Fc-gamma receptors and eliminate HIV-1-infected cells. J Virol 93:e01823-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01823-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Alsahafi N, Bakouche N, Kazemi M, Richard J, Ding S, Bhattacharyya S, Das D, Anand SP, Prevost J, Tolbert WD, Lu H, Medjahed H, Gendron-Lepage G, Ortega Delgado GG, Kirk S, Melillo B, Mothes W, Sodroski J, Smith AB III, Kaufmann DE, Wu X, Pazgier M, Rouiller I, Finzi A, Munro JB. 2019. An asymmetric opening of HIV-1 envelope mediates antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Cell Host Microbe 25:578–587. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Moore PL, Crooks ET, Porter L, Zhu P, Cayanan CS, Grise H, Corcoran P, Zwick MB, Franti M, Morris L, Roux KH, Burton DR, Binley JM. 2006. Nature of nonfunctional envelope proteins on the surface of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 80:2515–2528. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.5.2515-2528.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kassa A, Finzi A, Pancera M, Courter JR, Smith AB III, Sodroski J. 2009. Identification of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoprotein variant resistant to cold inactivation. J Virol 83:4476–4488. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02110-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Desormeaux A, Coutu M, Medjahed H, Pacheco B, Herschhorn A, Gu C, Xiang SH, Mao Y, Sodroski J, Finzi A. 2013. The highly conserved layer-3 component of the HIV-1 gp120 inner domain is critical for CD4-required conformational transitions. J Virol 87:2549–2562. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03104-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pacheco B, Alsahafi N, Debbeche O, Prevost J, Ding S, Chapleau JP, Herschhorn A, Madani N, Princiotto A, Melillo B, Gu C, Zeng X, Mao Y, Smith AB III, Sodroski J, Finzi A. 2017. Residues in the gp41 ectodomain regulate HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein conformational transitions induced by gp120-directed inhibitors. J Virol 91:e02219-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02219-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Brand D, Srinivasan K, Sodroski J. 1995. Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 entry in the CDR2 loop of the CD4 glycoprotein. J Virol 69:166–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA. 1998. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 393:648–659. doi: 10.1038/31405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lu M, Ma X, Castillo-Menendez LR, Gorman J, Alsahafi N, Ermel U, Terry DS, Chambers M, Peng D, Zhang B, Zhou T, Reichard N, Wang K, Grover JR, Carman BP, Gardner MR, Nikic-Spiegel I, Sugawara A, Arthos J, Lemke EA, Smith AB III, Farzan M, Abrams C, Munro JB, McDermott AB, Finzi A, Kwong PD, Blanchard SC, Sodroski JG, Mothes W. 2019. Associating HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein structures with states on the virus observed by smFRET. Nature 568:415–419. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1101-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gohain N, Tolbert WD, Acharya P, Yu L, Liu T, Zhao P, Orlandi C, Visciano ML, Kamin-Lewis R, Sajadi MM, Martin L, Robinson JE, Kwong PD, DeVico AL, Ray K, Lewis GK, Pazgier M. 2015. Cocrystal structures of antibody N60-i3 and antibody JR4 in complex with gp120 define more cluster A epitopes involved in effective antibody-dependent effector function against HIV-1. J Virol 89:8840–8854. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01232-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Alsahafi N, Anand SP, Castillo-Menendez L, Verly MM, Medjahed H, Prevost J, Herschhorn A, Richard J, Schon A, Melillo B, Freire E, Smith AB III, Sodroski J, Finzi A. 2018. SOSIP changes affect human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein conformation and CD4 engagement. J Virol 92:e01080-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01080-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Alsahafi N, Debbeche O, Sodroski J, Finzi A. 2015. Effects of the I559P gp41 change on the conformation and function of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) membrane envelope glycoprotein trimer. PLoS One 10:e0122111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Haim H, Salas I, McGee K, Eichelberger N, Winter E, Pacheco B, Sodroski J. 2013. Modeling virus- and antibody-specific factors to predict human immunodeficiency virus neutralization efficiency. Cell Host Microbe 14:547–558. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Medjahed H, Pacheco B, Desormeaux A, Sodroski J, Finzi A. 2013. The HIV-1 gp120 major variable regions modulate cold inactivation. J Virol 87:4103–4111. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03124-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.LaBonte JA, Patel T, Hofmann W, Sodroski J. 2000. Importance of membrane fusion mediated by human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoproteins for lysis of primary CD4-positive T cells. J Virol 74:10690–10698. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.22.10690-10698.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Madani N, Princiotto AM, Easterhoff D, Bradley T, Luo K, Williams WB, Liao HX, Moody MA, Phad GE, Vazquez Bernat N, Melillo B, Santra S, Smith AB III, Karlsson Hedestam GB, Haynes B, Sodroski J. 2016. Antibodies elicited by multiple envelope glycoprotein immunogens in primates neutralize primary human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV-1) sensitized by CD4-mimetic compounds. J Virol 90:5031–5046. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03211-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Madani N, Princiotto AM, Mach L, Ding S, Prevost J, Richard J, Hora B, Sutherland L, Zhao CA, Conn BP, Bradley T, Moody MA, Melillo B, Finzi A, Haynes BF, Smith AB III, Santra S, Sodroski J. 2018. A CD4-mimetic compound enhances vaccine efficacy against stringent immunodeficiency virus challenge. Nat Commun 9:2363. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04758-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Madani N, Princiotto AM, Zhao C, Jahanbakhshsefidi F, Mertens M, Herschhorn A, Melillo B, Smith AB III, Sodroski J. 2017. Activation and inactivation of primary human immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein trimers by CD4-mimetic compounds. J Virol 91:e01880-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01880-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Alberti MO, Jones JJ, Miglietta R, Ding H, Bakshi RK, Edmonds TG, Kappes JC, Ochsenbauer C. 2015. Optimized replicating renilla luciferase reporter HIV-1 utilizing novel internal ribosome entry site elements for native Nef expression and function. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 31:1278–1296. doi: 10.1089/aid.2015.0074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Cavrois M, Banerjee T, Mukherjee G, Raman N, Hussien R, Rodriguez BA, Vasquez J, Spitzer MH, Lazarus NH, Jones JJ, Ochsenbauer C, McCune JM, Butcher EC, Arvin AM, Sen N, Greene WC, Roan NR. 2017. Mass cytometric analysis of HIV entry, replication, and remodeling in tissue CD4+ T cells. Cell Rep 20:984–998. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Palese P, Tobita K, Ueda M, Compans RW. 1974. Characterization of temperature sensitive influenza virus mutants defective in neuraminidase. Virology 61:397–410. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(74)90276-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Leikina E, Markovic I, Chernomordik LV, Kozlov MM. 2000. Delay of influenza hemagglutinin refolding into a fusion-competent conformation by receptor binding: a hypothesis. Biophys J 79:1415–1427. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76393-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lundquist CA, Tobiume M, Zhou J, Unutmaz D, Aiken C. 2002. Nef-mediated downregulation of CD4 enhances human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in primary T lymphocytes. J Virol 76:4625–4633. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.9.4625-4633.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Weiss A, Littman DR. 1994. Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Cell 76:263–274. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90334-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Forthal DN, Finzi A. 2018. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in HIV infection. AIDS 32:2439–2451. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Richard J, Prevost J, Alsahafi N, Ding S, Finzi A. 2018. Impact of HIV-1 envelope conformation on ADCC responses. Trends Microbiol 26:253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Prevost J, Zoubchenok D, Richard J, Veillette M, Pacheco B, Coutu M, Brassard N, Parsons MS, Ruxrungtham K, Bunupuradah T, Tovanabutra S, Hwang KK, Moody MA, Haynes BF, Bonsignori M, Sodroski J, Kaufmann DE, Shaw GM, Chenine AL, Finzi A. 2017. Influence of the envelope gp120 Phe 43 cavity on HIV-1 sensitivity to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity responses. J Virol 91:e02452-16. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02452-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tolbert WD, Gohain N, Alsahafi N, Van V, Orlandi C, Ding S, Martin L, Finzi A, Lewis GK, Ray K, Pazgier M. 2017. Targeting the late stage of HIV-1 entry for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity: structural basis for Env epitopes in the C11 region. Structure 25:1719–1731. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Tolbert WD, Gohain N, Veillette M, Chapleau JP, Orlandi C, Visciano ML, Ebadi M, DeVico AL, Fouts TR, Finzi A, Lewis GK, Pazgier M. 2016. Paring down HIV Env: design and crystal structure of a stabilized inner domain of HIV-1 gp120 displaying a major ADCC target of the A32 region. Structure 24:697–709. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Guan Y, Pazgier M, Sajadi MM, Kamin-Lewis R, Al-Darmarki S, Flinko R, Lovo E, Wu X, Robinson JE, Seaman MS, Fouts TR, Gallo RC, DeVico AL, Lewis GK. 2013. Diverse specificity and effector function among human antibodies to HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein epitopes exposed by CD4 binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:E69–E78. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217609110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Williams KL, Stumpf M, Naiman NE, Ding S, Garrett M, Gobillot T, Vezina D, Dusenbury K, Ramadoss NS, Basom R, Kim PS, Finzi A, Overbaugh J. 2019. Identification of HIV gp41-specific antibodies that mediate killing of infected cells. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007572. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rho HM, Poiesz B, Ruscetti FW, Gallo RC. 1981. Characterization of the reverse transcriptase from a new retrovirus (HTLV) produced by a human cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cell line. Virology 112:355–360. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90642-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





