Skip to main content
ERJ Open Research logoLink to ERJ Open Research
. 2019 Oct 30;5(4):00254-2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00254-2018

Pregnancy after lung and heart–lung transplantation: a French multicentre retrospective study of 39 pregnancies

Charlotte Bry 1,, Dominique Hubert 2, Martine Reynaud-Gaubert 3, Claire Dromer 4, Hervé Mal 5, Antoine Roux 6, Véronique Boussaud 7, Johanna Claustre 8, Jérôme Le Pavec 9, Muriel Murris-Espin 10, Isabelle Danner-Boucher 1
PMCID: PMC6819984  PMID: 31687369

Abstract

Pregnancy after lung and heart–lung transplantation remains rare. This French study deals with change in lung function after a pregnancy and the maternal and newborn outcomes.

We retrospectively included 39 pregnancies in 35 women aged >20 years. Data on patients, course of pregnancies and newborns were collected from nine transplantation centres.

Mean age at time of pregnancy was 28 years. Cystic fibrosis affected 71% of patients. Mean±sd time between transplantation and pregnancy was 63±44 months. 26 births occurred (67%) with a mean term of 36 weeks of amenorrhoea and a mean birthweight of 2409 g. Prematurity was observed in 11 cases (43%). Forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 83.9% of predicted before pregnancy and 77.3% of predicted 1 year after the end of pregnancy (p=0.04). 10 patients developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction after delivery. Nine patients died at a mean±sd time after transplantation of 8.2±7 years and a mean±sd time after pregnancy of 4.6±6.5 years.

These data show that pregnancy remains feasible in lung and heart–lung transplant recipients, with more frequent maternal and newborn complications than in the general population. Survival in this cohort appears to be similar to the global survival observed in lung transplant recipients. Planned pregnancy and multidisciplinary follow-up are crucial.

Short abstract

Pregnancy in lung and heart–lung recipients remains rare but possible. There is a significant decrease in FEV1 pre- and post-pregnancy, but overall outcomes are reassuring. Specialised, multidisciplinary follow-up is necessary. http://bit.ly/31iXxov

Introduction

Lung transplantation is a valid treatment for selected patients with end-stage respiratory failure [1]. Advances in this field have made it possible to improve life expectancy and quality of life. More than 43% of lung transplant patients are women of childbearing age. At its best, controlling complications and ensuring a stable clinical condition has made it possible to allow women with solid organ transplants to undertake pregnancies. However, there are still ethical questions [2]. The largest studies available relate to women with renal transplants, and describe an increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and premature childbirth [35]. These studies were the main references used for the recommendations regarding pregnancy management in women with solid organ transplants [6]. As for women with lung transplantation, there are a limited number of studies, usually monocentric and involving small groups of patients [711]. According to the important National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR) [12], a higher risk of complications (death, allograft rejection and premature childbirth) is found. Currently, there are no specific international recommendations regarding pregnancy management in women with lung transplantation; only expert recommendations are available [13].

The main objective of this multicentre study was to assess the impact of pregnancy on lung allograft function. Secondary objectives were to describe maternal complications and child health.

Methods

This French study was approved by the Nantes University Hospital Centre Ethics Committee (GNEDS) and data were reported to the Commission Nationale Informatique et Liberté (CNIL) (the French data protection authority). Written informed consent was obtained.

Patients

We retrospectively included all pregnancies beginning between January 1, 1991 and April 1, 2013 in women who underwent lung transplantation (single lung, bilateral lung or heart and lung) in France.

Recruitment was carried out by contacting the attending physicians of the 11 French lung transplantation centres in France. Data were retrieved from local medical records.

Pre-defined exclusion criteria were women beginning pregnancy aged <18 years and adult women who had a legal guardian or were wards of the court.

Study design

The main criterion utilised (judgement criteria) was forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) at 1 year after the end of pregnancy. We compared this value with the pre-pregnancy FEV1, defined as the last available value before pregnancy. A decrease of ≥5% in the absolute FEV1 value was considered significant [14]. For patients who received several transplants, we analysed the last transplant before pregnancy.

Baseline data were collected (age at time of transplant, age at start of pregnancy, underlying disease and surgical procedure). FEV1, body mass index (BMI), renal failure, diabetes, arterial hypertension, acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) were assessed before pregnancy, at the end of pregnancy and 1 year after the end of pregnancy. CLAD was defined according to the current classification system [15].

Specific data on the pregnancy were also retrieved: prior consent, assisted or unassisted pregnancy, outcomes, immunosuppressive regime and infections. Characteristics related to the newborn (weight, initial health and breastfeeding) were reported. The newborn's health was considered as normal when the Apgar score (an evaluation of major vital functions at birth) at 5 min was 10.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were mainly descriptive. The main criterion was the FEV1 at 1 year after the end of pregnancy. This value was compared with the pre-pregnancy FEV1 using a matched-pair t-test.

A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were carried out with SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

We included 35 patients with 39 monitored pregnancies in 11 centres in France. Two centres included 22 pregnancies and two others centres did not include any pregnancies. There were no excluded patients based on our pre-defined criteria. Seven pregnancies (18%) required assistance with fertility treatment (n=33 in vitro fertilisation, n=3 ovarian stimulation with insemination and n=1 missing data) and seven started without the approval of the transplant team.

Mean±sd age was 28±5 years at the beginning of pregnancy. The majority of women underwent bilateral lung transplant (n=22 (63%)), none underwent single lung transplant and in the residual 37% they had a concomitant heart transplant. One woman became pregnant after a second bilateral lung transplantation. The underlying diagnosis was cystic fibrosis for 25 patients (71%). Mean±sd time between transplantation and the start of pregnancy was 63±44 months (table 1).

TABLE 1.

Baseline patient characteristics

Patients 35
Age at transplant years 23±5
Age at start of pregnancy years 28±5
BMI before pregnancy kg·m−2 19.8±2.5
FEV1 before pregnancy % pred 83±25
Time between transplant and pregnancy months 63±44
Underlying disease
 Cystic fibrosis 25 (71)
 Pulmonary hypertension 7 (20)
 Others 3 (9)
Type of surgery
 Bilateral lung 22 (63)
 Heart–lung 13 (37)

Data are presented as n, mean±sd or n (%). BMI: body mass index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s.

26 pregnancies (67%) resulted in childbirth. As for the 13 other pregnancies, there were seven spontaneous miscarriages, three therapeutic terminations of pregnancy, two voluntary interruptions of pregnancy and one miscarriage resulting from maternal death at 6 weeks of amenorrhoea (WA). For two patients, therapeutic termination of pregnancy was done due to an excessively premature pregnancy regarding transplant; for the third, therapeutic termination of pregnancy was done due to an unstable respiratory condition (table 2).

TABLE 2.

Pregnancy outcomes

Spontaneous miscarriage 7 (18)
Voluntary termination of pregnancy 2 (5)
Therapeutic termination of pregnancy 3 (8)
Death of pregnant women 1 (3)
Birth 26 (67)

Data are presented as n (%).

Complications during pregnancy included gestational diabetes in two, pregnancy-induced hypertension in three, pre-eclampsia in one, renal failure in one and eight infections including one severe acute pneumonitis resulting in death at 6 WA (table 3). No acute cellular rejection or CLAD was diagnosed during pregnancy. Immunosuppressive treatment included a combination of corticosteroid (n=24), cyclosporine (n=17), tacrolimus (n=16) and azathioprine (n=22).

TABLE 3.

Maternal complications during pregnancy

Diabetes
 Before pregnancy 19 (51)
 During pregnancy 18 (55)
 Gestational diabetes 2 (6)
Arterial hypertension
 Before pregnancy 18 (51)
 During pregnancy 17 (59)
 Pregnancy-induced hypertension 3 (10)
Renal failure
 Before pregnancy 21 (58)
 During pregnancy 19 (61)
 New during pregnancy 1 (3)
Acute rejections
 Before pregnancy 14 (39)
 During pregnancy 0 (0)
 After pregnancy 11 (33)
Infections during pregnancy 8 (24)

Data are presented as n (%).

There were 26 newborns, 90% of which were in normal clinical condition at birth. Childbirth was induced for 50% of the births and 48% of the patients gave birth via caesarean section. Two newborns presented serious complications at birth as a result of extreme prematurity (22 and 28 WA). The mean±sd term was 36±5 WA, with 43% prematurity (<37 WA). Among the 11 premature newborns, five resulted from spontaneous delivery (45%), four from induced premature delivery (36%) and two sets of data were missing. The mean±sd birthweight was 2409±920 g and 48% presented with low birthweight (<2500 g). 96% of the children were not breastfed. No malformation was reported (table 4).

TABLE 4.

Newborn characteristics

Newborns 26
Pregnancy term WA 36±5
Induced labour 11 (42)
Caesarean section 12 (46)
Premature childbirth (<37 WA) 11 (42)
Weight at birth g 2409±920
Underweight 12 (46)
Breastfeeding 1 (4)

Data are presented as n, mean±sd or n (%). WA: weeks of amenorrhoea.

The mean FEV1 % pred before pregnancy was 82.5% and at 1 year after the end of pregnancy was 77.3% (p=0.04) (figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Evolution of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) before pregnancy and 1 year after the end of pregnancy: overall population and subgroup analysis according to chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) status. Data are represented as mean±sd FEV1 % pred. *: p<0.05.

At 1 year after the end of pregnancy, we noted a decrease of FEV1 % pred of >5% in 14 pregnancies (13 patients, one of whom had two pregnancies). As for the other 23 pregnancies (21 patients, two of whom had two pregnancies each), respiratory functions did not change significantly. Two patients died before 1 year post-pregnancy. 11 patients experienced one or more acute cellular rejection episode. 15 patients had CLAD, 10 of which were reported after pregnancy (one CLAD was reported after two pregnancies) (table 5). For patients with CLAD before pregnancy, FEV1 was stable 1 year before pregnancy; mean±sd FEV1 % pred was 56.4±37.3% right before pregnancy and 57.6±36.8% 1 year after the end of pregnancy (p=0.5). The median (interquartile range (IQR)) follow-up after transplantation was 12.5 (8.0–18.5) years. At the end of follow-up, nine patients had died (one during pregnancy) within a mean±sd time of 4.6±6.5 years after pregnancy and 8.2±7.0 years after transplantation. At 12 years, survival was 71.2±9.0% (figure 2). Seven of the deceased patients had CLAD. Five patients died of CLAD-related terminal respiratory failure, two of pulmonary infection, one of pulmonary embolism and one of heart failure.

TABLE 5.

Characteristics of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) patients

CLAD patients 15
CLAD diagnosis
 Before pregnancy 5 (16)
 During pregnancy 0 (0)
 After pregnancy 10 (46)
Time of appearance of CLAD after pregnancy months (n=10) 22.5±14.6
Time between CLAD and transplant months (n=10) 78.1±38.2
Patient outcomes
 Stable 5 (33)
 Retransplantation 3 (20)
 Death 7 (47)

Data are presented as n, mean±sd or n (%).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. At 12 years, survival was 71.2±9.0%. n=35 patients.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest cohort of pregnancies in women with lung and heart–lung transplantation, and the first to report a significant deterioration of lung function 1 year after the end of pregnancy. We found a decrease of >5% of FEV1 % pred, which was not apparently related to an increase risk of CLAD or acute cellular rejection.

At present, around 100 pregnancies have been reported for women with lung or heart–lung transplantation. 35 are recorded in the US NTPR registry [6], which compiles pregnancies in women with solid organ transplants. There is no precise description of respiratory function changes, although they reported a greater number of graft rejections, compared with other organs, within 2 years after pregnancy. The single-centre study conducted by Thakrar et al. [16] on 14 pregnancies found post-pregnancy FEV1 stability (1.1% variation), but it is noteworthy that they reported one patient who presented with severe and rapid bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome at the onset of pregnancy and was excluded from the lung function analysis.

In our study, 14 patients had an absolute FEV1 decrease of >5% and 10 had an absolute FEV1 decrease >10% 1 year after the end of pregnancy. Among these 14 patients, only six patients developed CLAD after pregnancy. As for the other eight patients, one had developed CLAD before being pregnant and worsened lung function during pregnancy, while no cause for FEV1 % pred decrease was identified in the remaining seven. Among the latter, no diagnosis of CLAD was recorded at the 1-year time-point. It is difficult to assert if this lung function decrease should be considered as clinically significant. In our study, the survival appeared reasonable. At 12 years, the survival was 71% and the estimated median survival was 24 years. Median survival conditional on survival to 1 year for adult lung transplants was 7.9 years and at 12 years after transplantation, 30% were alive [17].

It is important to note that our study population is not comparable in every way to other described cohorts. Cystic fibrosis affected >70% of our patients compared with 57% in both Shaner et al. [12] and Thakrar et al. [16]. As a consequence, mean age was 28 years, which is younger than in previous studies [12, 16]. In France, cystic fibrosis was the primary underlying disease for lung transplantation at the time of the study [18], which is not the case in the USA, for example, where chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/emphysema predominates. In contrast to other studies, no patient presented any new acute rejection or CLAD during pregnancy. Shaner et al. [12] reported a rate of 17% acute rejection. We can hypothesise that invasive tests such as transbronchial biopsies were not likely to be performed during pregnancy and thus acute rejection might have been underdiagnosed. Nonetheless, some authors describe possible immunotolerance mechanisms during pregnancy due to a decreased T-lymphocyte response [19]. In the post-partum period, we reported four acute rejections in two patients within the 6 months following childbirth. The first patient quickly developed CLAD. The second patient presented progressive aggravation of CLAD. 10 patients developed CLAD after pregnancy, with a mean time of 22.5 months after pregnancy and 6.5 years after the transplant. At present, three patients have been retransplanted and four have died. The time between transplant and post-pregnancy CLAD is hardly comparable to that normally found in people as a whole that have transplants. The prevailing trend is 30% at 3 years and 50% at 5 years [20]. In our study, the mean time between transplantation and pregnancy was 63 months. Pregnancy is contraindicated in patients with unstable health and presenting with serious, rapid post-transplant complications such as CLAD. This is an important bias that explains the longer timeframe. The post-partum period is considered at risk for graft rejection [21]. First, this can be due to the sudden disappearance of the placenta and the decrease in circulating progesterone levels. Additionally, there is a sudden modification of volume distribution, thus making it difficult to monitor the immunosuppressive treatment. Finally, there can be issues with treatment compliance due to post-partum depression [21], as was the case for one of our patients who developed CLAD at 36 months post-partum. In some centres, corticosteroid dose was increased for a few weeks after childbirth in order to account for this presumed risk.

The time period of 63 months between pregnancy and transplant concurs with the timeframe of at least 1 year recommended by the NTPR and the American Society of Transplantation for pregnancies after solid organ transplantation [22, 23]. It is actually even higher, as in the previous studies [12, 16], due to more frequent complications following lung transplantation. The recent studies argue for a minimal 2-year timeframe between lung transplantation and pregnancy [12].

It is remarkable that 41% of the pregnancies were unplanned; the recent work by Thakrar et al. [16] found a similar rate (36%). Information on contraception is essential and should be provided promptly after transplantation. Before conception, patients should be informed of the possible maternal complications and the fetal/neonatal risks. The transplantation team, with the help of other specialists, should try to find the best time with the patient for pregnancy to ensure lung allograft stability and fetal wellbeing. None of the women in our study was on mycophenolate acid products during pregnancy. This antimetabolite is known to increase risks of miscarriage and congenital malformations [24, 25].

Assistance with fertility treatment was required for seven patients (18%). Most of the women were aged >30 years and all but one of the patients had cystic fibrosis, a pathology known to affect fertility in both men and women [26]. Five of the medically assisted pregnancies (71%) were successful. Medically assisted pregnancy can thus be a solution for these patients.

The birth rate in our study was 67%, which was higher than in the literature (42% in the study of Thakrar et al. [16] and 56% in Shaner et al. [12]). However, it is possible that not all premature miscarriages were reported.

Our results confirm data described previously, with a strong premature birth rate, a mean term of 36 WA and 48% premature births. 45% occurred because of spontaneous delivery. Mean birthweight connected with the premature births was 2409 g. Armenti et al. [5] report a mean birthweight of 2285 g. In the overall population, the mean birthweight is 3500 g, which is significantly higher (p<0.001).

These complications are described in patients with cystic fibrosis but without transplants [27]. Nonetheless, complications are also described in women with other organ transplantation, which raises the question of the role of immunosuppressive treatment. Additionally, there was no difference in premature birth rate and mean weight at birth between women with cystic fibrosis and the others.

Childbirth was often induced or via caesarean section. It is nonetheless clear that there were none but obstetric reasons for carrying out caesarean sections [10, 28]. Childbirth was more complex and riskier than for other women due to the most frequent complications, such as pregnancy-induced hypertension with risk of pre-eclampsia, gestational diabetes and premature childbirth.

Only one child (4%) was breastfed. Current data are unclear about breastfeeding management.

At present, no child seems to have psychomotor development problems or has presented with malformation.

Our study has several limitations. Although we report the largest cohort of pregnancies in lung and heart–lung transplantation, the number is limited.

It would be interesting to go back to the subgroup of patients presenting with a FEV1 % pred decrease at 1 year after the end of pregnancy without any noted CLAD diagnosis and follow-up on their FEV1 changes and mortality. These additional analyses might help to determine if the drop in FEV1 observed is clinically relevant and if pregnancy entails any actual risk to the lung allograft.

Data collection was retrospective. Moreover, obstetric data and child-related data were difficult to obtain, because these data are often not provided in the transplantation medical records. Some data, such as cytomegalovirus status or the presence of donor-specific antibodies, were not available for the earliest pregnancies reported in this study.

This study confirms the possibility of pregnancy in patients with lung and heart–lung transplantation. It also highlights the risks for their health and that of the newborn, and the need for clear information when a conception project is discussed. The pregnancy should be planned and carried out with a strong collaboration between the patient, the transplantation team and a specialised multidisciplinary medical team.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of all French lung transplantation centres for their help in data collection. We are furthermore grateful to Francois-Xavier Blanc and Adrien Tissot (CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France) for careful reading of the manuscript. We thank Béatrice Guyomarch (Institut du Thorax, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France) for statistical analysis.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: C. Bry has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: D. Hubert has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Reynaud-Gaubert has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: C. Dromer has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: H. Mal reports nonfinancial support from Roche, Boehringer, CSL Behring and Novartis, outside the submitted work.

Conflict of interest: A. Roux has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: V. Boussaud has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: J. Claustre has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: J. Le Pavec has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: M. Murris-Espin has nothing to disclose.

Conflict of interest: I. Danner-Boucher has nothing to disclose.

References

  • 1.Yusen RD, Christie JD, Edwards LB, et al. . The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirtieth adult lung and heart-lung transplant report – 2013; focus theme: age. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32: 965–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ross LF. Ethical considerations related to pregnancy in transplant recipients. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1313–1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.EBPG Expert Group on Renal Transplantation. European best practice guidelines for renal transplantation. Section IV: long-term management of the transplant recipient. IV.10. Pregnancy in renal transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: Suppl. 4, 50–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McKay DB, Josephson MA. Pregnancy in recipients of solid organs – effects on mother and child. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1281–1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Armenti VT, Constantinescu S, Moritz MJ, et al. . Pregnancy after transplantation. Transplant Rev 2008; 22: 223–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, Moritz MJ, et al. . Report from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (NTPR): outcomes of pregnancy after transplantation. Clin Transpl 2010; 7: 65–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Estensen M, Gude E, Ekmehag B, et al. . Pregnancy in heart- and heart/lung recipients can be problematic. Scand Cardiovasc J 2011; 45: 349–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Parry D, Hextall A, Robinson VP, et al. . Pregnancy following a single lung transplant. Thorax 1996; 51: 1162–1164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Baron O, Hubaut J, Galetta D, et al. . Pregnancy and heart-lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2002; 21: 914–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu DW, Wilt J, Restaino S. Pregnancy after thoracic organ transplantation. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 354–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zurbano F, López F, Fornet I, et al. . Maternity and lung transplantation: cases in Spain. Arch Bronconeumol 2012; 48: 379–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shaner J, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. . Pregnancy after lung transplant. Prog Transplant 2012; 22: 134–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vos R, Ruttens D, Verleden SE, et al. . Pregnancy after heart and lung transplantation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 28: 1146–1162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pennock BE, Rogers RM, McCaffree DR. Changes in measured spirometric indices. What is significant? Chest 1981; 80: 97–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Verleden GM, Raghu G, Meyer KC, et al. . A new classification system for chronic lung allograft dysfunction. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33: 127–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Thakrar MV, Morley K, Lordan JL, et al. . Pregnancy after lung and heart-lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33: 593–598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yusen RD, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. . The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-first adult lung and heart-lung transplant report – 2014; focus theme: retransplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014; 33: 1009–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Agence de la Biomédicine. Greffe cardio-pulmonaire et pulmonaire. [Cardiopulmonary and pulmonary transplant.] 2103. www.agence-biomedecine.fr/annexes/bilan2013/donnees/organes/04-coeur-poumon/pdf/pcp.pdf Date last accessed: September 3, 2019.
  • 19.Ma KK, Petroff MG, Coscia LA, et al. . Complex chimerism: pregnancy after solid organ transplantation. Chimerism 2013; 4: 71–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Glanville AR, Aboyoun C, Klepetko W, et al. . Three-year results of an investigator-driven multicenter, international, randomized open-label de novo trial to prevent BOS after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 16–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mastrobattista JM, Gomez-Lobo V. Pregnancy after solid organ transplantation. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 919–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McKay DB, Josephson MA, Armenti VT, et al. . Reproduction and transplantation: report on the AST Consensus Conference on Reproductive Issues and Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1592–1599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Deshpande NA, Coscia LA, Gomez-Lobo V, et al. . Pregnancy after solid organ transplantation: a guide for obstetric management. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2013; 6: 116–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim M, Rostas S, Gabardi S. Mycophenolate fetal toxicity and risk evaluation and mitigation strategies. Am J Transplant 2013; 13: 1383–1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, et al. . Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation 2006; 82: 1698–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kopito LE, Kosasky HJ, Shwachman H. Water and electrolytes in cervical mucus from patients with cystic fibrosis. Fertil Steril 1973; 24: 512–516. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lau EMT, Barnes DJ, Moriarty C, et al. . Pregnancy outcomes in the current era of cystic fibrosis care: a 15-year experience. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 51: 220–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Troché V, Ville Y, Fernandez H. Pregnancy after heart or heart-lung transplantation: a series of 10 pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 454–458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ERJ Open Research are provided here courtesy of European Respiratory Society

RESOURCES