Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Oct 29;9:15557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51914-2

Aβ modulates actin cytoskeleton via SHIP2-mediated phosphoinositide metabolism

Hae Nim Lee 1, Kyoung Mi Sim 1,2, Hyunbin Kim 1,3, Jeongmin Ju 1,4, Ae Nim Pae 1,3,4, Jae-Bong Park 5, Hoon Ryu 6, Jihye Seong 1,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC6820556  PMID: 31664099

Abstract

Emerging evidences suggest that phospholipid metabolism is altered in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but molecular mechanisms on how this affects neurodegeneration in AD is poorly understood. SHIP2 is a phosphoinositide-metabolizing enzyme, which dephosphorylates PI(3,4,5)P3 resulting to PI(3,4)P2, and it has been recently shown that Aβ directly increases the activity of SHIP2. Here we monitored, utilizing fluorescent SHIP2 biosensor, real-time increase of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles in HT22 cells treated with Aβ. Interestingly, PI(3,4)P2 is accumulated at late endosomes and lysosomal vesicles. We further discovered that ARAP3 can be attracted to PI(3,4)P2-positive mature endosomes via its PH domain and this facilitates the degradation of ARAP3. The reduced level of ARAP3 then causes RhoA hyperactivation and filamentous actin, which are critical for neurodegeneration in AD. These results provide a novel molecular link between Aβ and actin disruption through dysregulated phosphoinositide metabolism, and the SHIP2-PI(3,4)P2-ARAP3-RhoA signaling pathway can be considered as new therapeutic targets for synaptic dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s disease.

Subject terms: Phosphoinositol signalling, Mechanisms of disease

Introduction

Phosphoinositides (PIs) play crucial roles in dynamic cellular processes such as membrane trafficking, thus spatiotemporal distribution of different phosphoinositides should be tightly controlled by their metabolizing enzymes1–3. For example, at the initial stage of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), PI(3,4)P2 at plasma membrane binds to clathrin adaptor protein AP-2 which is crucial for the formation of endocytic vesicle coats4,5. After this nucleation stage, synaptojanin-p170 can be recruited by clathrin-coat components and then dephosphorylates PI(4,5)P2 into PI4P6,7. PI4P can be further phosphorylated by PI3K C2α and then produce PI(3,4)P22,3,8.

PI(3,4)P2 can be also generated from PI(3,4,5)P3 by Src homology domain-containing inositol 5-phosphatase 2 (SHIP2), which is recruited to clathrin coated pits (CCPs) via intersectin9,10. PI(3,4)P2 then recruits a BAR domain-containing protein SNX92, which allows the shape of CCPs to be competent for fission by dynamin11,12. In addition to its role in CME, PI(3,4)P2 is also suggested to be crucial for fast endophilin-mediated endocytosis (FEME), a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway13. During FEME, SHIP2 activity is important to generate PI(3,4)P2 which then recruits endophilin, a BAR domain-containing protein13,14. After the fission of endocytic vesicles, PI(3,4)P2 is suggested to be dephosphorylated by inositol-3, 4-bisphosphate 4-phosphatse (INPP4), and the resulting PI3P is known as a major component of early endosomes15. During endosome maturation process, PI3P is phosphorylated by PIKfyve producing PI(3,5)P2, a major phospholipid in late endosomes and lysosomes1,16. Therefore, spatiotemporal distribution of phosphoinositides are tightly controlled during dynamic endocytosis and endosome-lysosome maturation process.

Emerging evidences suggest that phospholipid metabolism is altered in AD17–20. For example, a recent study reported that oligomeric amyloid β (Aβ) activates SHIP2 via FcγRIIb to increase the level of PI(3,4)P2, which then causes tau hyperphosphorylation in AD21. SHIP2 is composed of an N-terminal SH2 domain, a catalytic domain, a C2 domain, an NPXY motif, proline-rich regions, and a C-terminal sterile α motif (SAM) domain22. SHIP2 can be recruited to plasma membrane by the interaction of its SH2 domain and the phosphorylated tyrosine of the activated receptors such as IGF-1R and FcγRIIb21,23,24. At the plasma membrane, the catalytic domain of SHIP2 can function as an inositol 5-phosphatase for PI(3,4,5)P3 producing PI(3,4)P2, and the following C2 domain has been recently suggested to enhance the catalytic turnover22. Other domains of SHIP2 mediate interactions with various signaling proteins, for example, Shc, Abl, filamin, intersectin, ARAP3, and EphA210,25–29, thus SHIP2 can be involved in many cellular processes such as cell adhesion, spreading, receptor endocytosis, and insulin signaling29–31.

In particular, SHIP2 directly binds to ARAP3, ArfGAP with RhoGAP domain, Ankyrin repeat and PH domain 3, through the interaction of its C-terminal SAM domain with the SAM domain of ARAP328,32. ARAP3 is a GTPase activating protein (GAP) for Arf6 and RhoA, which contains an N-terminal SAM domain, 5 PH domains and a Ras-binding domain (RBD)33. It has been well known that ARAP3 is a negative regulator for RhoA33,34, which can be further related to neuronal actin cytoskeleton. Interestingly, the function of ARAP3 is also tightly regulated by phosphoinositide metabolism, as ARAP3 can be recruited to plasma membrane where it functions, through the interaction with PI(3,4,5)P3 via its N-terminal PH domains35. While the phosphoinositide metabolism is dysregulated in AD19,21, it is not clear yet whether this altered phosphoinositide metabolism also affects the function of ARAP3 and contributes to the neurotoxicity in Aβ-induced AD model. In fact, hyperactivation of RhoA and the accumulation of filamentous actin (F-actin) have been reported in AD36, and ARAP3 may be involved in AD as a negative regulator for RhoA33,34. Thus, we decided to investigate how Aβ-induced alteration of phosphoinositide metabolism via SHIP2 activation affects the function of ARAP3, actin cytoskeleton and neurotoxicity.

To monitor the real-time SHIP2 activity and dynamic spatiotemporal distribution of PI(3,4)P2 in live cells, a fluorescent SHIP2 biosensor was generated by fusing a TAPP1-PH domain, which specifically binds to PI(3,4)P2, and a red fluorescent protein mKate237,38. In addition, RhoA activity in live cells was measured by a RhoA biosensor based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)39. We also applied bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) technique to identify ARAP3 PH domain capable of binding to PI(3,4)P2. Utilizing these fluorescent biosensors, we discovered that Aβ increases the SHIP2-mediated production of PI(3,4)P2, particularly at late endosomes and lysosomal vesicles. This accumulation of mature endosomes containing PI(3,4)P2, which can directly interact with the PH domain of ARAP3, facilitates the degradation of ARAP3 through lysosomal pathway. We further showed that the reduced ARAP3 level can cause the hyperactivation of RhoA and subsequent formation of F-actin. These results provide a novel molecular link between Aβ and actin disruption through dysregulated phosphoinositide metabolism. As actin disruption can further contribute to degeneration of neurites and synaptic dysfunctions in AD36,40,41, the Aβ-SHIP2-ARAP3-RhoA signaling pathway can be considered as new therapeutic candidates for Alzheimer’s disease.

Results

Aβ induces the SHIP2-mediated PI(3,4)P2 accumulation at vesicles

It has been shown that Aβ can induce the activity of SHIP2 and increase the level of PI(3,4)P221. For the detection of subcellular distribution of PI(3,4)P2 induced by 1 μM of oligomeric Aβ, we performed the immunocytochemistry staining and found the perinuclear accumulation of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles (Fig. 1a,b). This Aβ-induced increase of PI(3,4)P2 vesicles was prevented by SHIP2 inhibitor AS1938909 (AS09) (Fig. 1a,b, Supplementary Fig. S1a) or SHIP2 siRNA (Supplementary Fig. S1b,c). These data indicate that Aβ increases the SHIP2-mediated accumulation of PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles near perinuclear regions. Oligomeric Aβ was prepared as previously described42, and its toxicity was confirmed with WST colorimetric assay in mouse hippocampal neuronal HT22 cells and human neuroblastoma SHSY5Y cells. When these cells were treated with 1 μM of oligomeric Aβ for 24 hr, cell viability was significantly reduced down to around 60% (Supplementary Fig. S2a,b). While its activity is increased, total expression level of SHIP2 was not changed by the incubation of Aβ for 24 hr in HT22 cells and SHSY5Y cells (Supplementary Fig. S2c,d).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Aβ increases SHIP2-mediated PI(3,4)P2 accumulation at vesicles. (a,b) Representative images of PI(3,4)P2 in HT22 cells stimulated with 1 μM Aβ in the absence or presence of 10 μM AS09 for 24 hr (a) and the quantification of fluorescence intensity (b) are presented (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 48~55 cells per group). (c) Schematic illustration of mKate2-TAPP1-PH sensor to visualize the distribution of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles. (d,e) Time-lapse analysis (d) and representative images (e) of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles in HT22 cells after the treatment of 1 μM oligomeric Aβ for 24 hr (n = 3). Insets show the boxed areas at high magnification and yellow arrows indicate PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles. (f,g) Representative images of mKate2-TAPP1-PH in HT22 cells stimulated with 1 μM Aβ in the absence or presence of 10 μM AS1938909 (AS09) for 24 hr (f) and the quantification of vesicle numbers per each cell (g) are presented (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 41~46 cells per group).

To investigate the real-time SHIP2 activity in live cells with high spatiotemporal resolutions, we generated a fluorescent protein-based SHIP2 sensor containing a PH domain of TAPP1 and red fluorescent protein mKate2 (Fig. 1c). As the TAPP1-PH domain specifically binds to PI(3,4)P2, a product of SHIP2 activity37,38, this red-colored fluorescent sensor can visualize dynamic change of PI(3,4)P2 distribution induced by SHIP2 in live cells. In fact, we can observe real-time increase of PI(3,4)P2 at vesicles near perinuclear regions in response to 1 μM of Aβ oligomers (Fig. 1d,e; Supplementary Video 1). These vesicles started to appear after around 10 hr of Aβ incubation, and the number of vesicles was gradually increased until around 20 hr (Fig. 1d,e). The number of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles was significantly higher in the Aβ-treated group comparing to negative control, and this Aβ-induced increase of PI(3,4)P2 vesicles was prevented by SHIP2 inhibitor, AS09 (Fig. 1f,g), suggesting that the increase of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles is induced by Aβ-mediated SHIP2 activation.

ARAP3 is physically associated with PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles via its PH domains

We next investigated the effect of the SHIP2-induced production of PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles. It has been shown that SHIP2 can directly bind to ARAP3 through their SAM domain interaction28. In addition, ARAP3 contains 5 PH domains (PH1, PH2, PH3, PH4, PH5) (Fig. 2a), which can potentially interact with phosphoinositides43. In fact, it has been shown that ARAP3 can bind to PI(3,4,5)P3 via its N-terminal PH domains PH1 and PH235, but whether ARAP3 can directly interact with PI(3,4)P2 is not clear. Thus, we check the distribution of ARAP3 after 24 hr of Aβ treatment, and interestingly, we can observe that ARAP3 is partly located at the PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles (Fig. 2b,c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

ARAP3 can be associated with PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles via its PH4 domain. (a) The scheme of ARAP3 domains. (b) ARAP3 (green) is partially localized at PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles (red) in HT22 cells treated with 1 μM of Aβ for 24 hr. Lower panels show the boxed areas of upper panels at high magnification. (c) Intensity profiles of PI(3,4)P2 and ARAP3 across the yellow line in the merged image shown in (b). (d) EGFP-tagged each PH domain of ARAP3 (green), mKate2-TAPP1 (red) and merged images of HT22 cells after 48 hr starvation. Btk PH domain-EGFP was used as control. (e) Pearson coefficient was calculated to measure colocalization between TAPP1-PH and each ARAP3-PH construct (n = 16, 61, 64, 34, 49, 30 for Btk PH, ARAP3 PH1, PH2, PH3, PH4 and PH5, respectively) (f,g) BiFC design of VN173-TAPP1 PH domain and VC-155-ARAP3 PH4 domain (f) and BiFC signal in HT22 cells after 48 hr starvation (g). Yellow arrows highlight the BiFC signal at vesicles.

To further identify which PH domain of ARAP3 is capable of binding to PI(3,4)P2, we generated constructs containing EGFP and each PH domain of ARAP335 (Supplementary Fig. S3), and check whether each EGFP signal can be colocalized with mKate2-tagged TAPP1 PH domain. Our results show that ARAP3 PH4 and PH5 domains can be colocalized with PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles (Fig. 2d,e, Supplementary Fig. S4). PH4 domain displayed the highest correlation, thus we further designed a bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) system of VN173-tagged TAPP1 PH domain and VC155-tagged ARAP3 PH4 domain (Fig. 2f, Supplementary S5). If TAPP1 PH and ARAP3 PH domains are close each other, the N- and C-terminal fragments of Venus (VN173 and VC155) can be reassembled to recover its yellow fluorescence44. Indeed, we can observe yellow fluorescence at vesicles, confirming strong interaction between ARAP3 PH4 domain and TAPP1 PH domain (Fig. 2g), probably mediated by their binding to PI(3,4)P2. We further confirmed that direct addition of PI(3,4)P2 can induce the yellow BiFC signal from VN173-ARAP3 PH4 and VC155-TAPP1 PH domain (Supplementary S6). Therefore, these results suggest that ARAP3 can be physically attracted to PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles via its PH domains.

PI(3,4)P2-enriched mature endosomes facilitates the degradation of ARAP3

We learned that Aβ-mediated SHIP2 activity induces the accumulation of PI(3,4)P2-enriched vesicles near perinuclear regions (Fig. 1). In addition, we found that ARAP3 can directly bind to PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles via its PH domains (Fig. 2). Thus, we then tried to check the effect of Aβ treatment on ARAP3. Interestingly, in HT22 cells treated with Aβ for 24 hr, we observed that the level of cytosolic ARAP3 is significantly decreased (Fig. 3a,b). The Aβ-mediated decrease in the ARAP3 expression level was also confirmed by western blotting in SHSY5Y cells (Fig. 3c,d). This reduction of cytosolic ARAP3 level was prevented by SHIP2 inhibitor AS09 (Fig. 3a,b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Aβ-mediated SHIP2 activation reduces the expression level of ARAP3. (a) Representative images of ARAP3 (green) in HT22 cells incubated without or with 1 μM Aβ in the absence or presence of 10 μM AS09. Cell nuclei were stained with hoechst33342 (blue). (b) The fluorescence intensity of cytosolic ARAP3 was quantified (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 78~100 cells per group). (c,d) The expression levels of ARAP3 in SH-SY5Y cells with or without the treatment of 1 μM Aβ for 24 hr. ARAP3 level was quantified by densitometry analysis and normalized to β-actin (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 4). (e) The expression level of ARAP3 in HT22 cells treated by various concentrations of PI(3,4)P2 with or without histone carriers for 24 hr. β-actin was used as a loading control. (f) ARAP3 level was quantified by densitometry analysis and normalized to β-actin (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 3).

These results imply that Aβ-mediated SHIP2 activity and the subsequent accumulation of PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles may contribute to the reduced level of ARAP3. To test whether the increase of PI(3,4)P2 can decrease the ARAP3 level, we next directly applied PI(3,4)P2 to cells. For the efficient intracellular delivery, PI(3,4)P2 was complexed with polyamine carrier histone H145. Our results showed that, indeed, the ARAP3 level was significantly decreased by direct addition of 20 μM PI(3,4)P2 with the carrier (Fig. 3e,f), suggesting the overproduced PI(3,4)P2 contributes to the reduced level of ARAP3.

Aβ-mediated PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles are mature endosomes

We showed that Aβ induces the accumulation of PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles, which can physically recruit ARAP3, and this facilitates the reduction of ARAP3 expression. We hypothesized that Aβ-induced endocytosis and the subsequent lysosomal pathway may be related to the decreased level of ARAP3. Thus, we next investigated the maturation stage of the PI(3,4)P2-containing vesicles at perinuclear regions.

Different species of phosphoinositide are involved in the maturation process of internalized vesicles1,3. In particular, it has been suggested that PI(3,4)P2 recruits the BAR proteins for the membrane constriction during initial stage of endocytosis, and then converted to PI3P in early endosomes11,13,14. Thus, the PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles are expected to be found mainly in early endosomes. However, when we compared the distribution of the vesicles with different endosomal markers Rab5a, Rab7a and LAMP1, the PI(3,4)P2-enriched vesicles at perinuclear regions were surprisingly colocalized with Rab7a and LAMP1 which represent late endosomes and lysosomes (Fig. 4a,b).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Aβ-mediated accumulation of PI(3,4)P2 facilitates endocytosis and lysosomal pathway of ARAP3. (a) Schematic representation of endosome maturation process. Different endosomal markers and inhibitors are displayed. (b) Distribution of different endosomal markers, Rab5, Rab7a, and LAMP-1 (green) and PI(3,4)P2 labelled with mKate-TAPP1-PH (red), in HT22 cells treated by 1 μM Aβ for 24 hr. Merged images are shown in the right panels. Insets show the boxed areas at high magnification. (c) The cytosolic expression level of ARAP3 in HT22 cells expressing EGFP or EGFP-dynamin K44A treated with 1 μM Aβ for 24 hr. (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 32~40 cells per group). (d) The cytosolic expression level of ARAP3 in HT22 cells treated with 1 μM Aβ for 24 hr in the absence or presence of bafilomycin A1. (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 48~68 cells per group).

In fact, PI(3,5)P2 has been known as the major phosphoinositide of late endosomes and lysosomes1, thus we further wondered whether the Aβ-induced accumulation of PI(3,4)P2 at perinuclear regions affects the distribution of PI(3,5)P2. Our result showed that, in the control cells, PI(3,5)P2 is mainly found at the vesicles near perinuclear regions, but this normal distribution of PI(3,5)P2 at perinuclear regions was significantly reduced by the treatment of Aβ (Supplementary Fig. S7). In addition, segmented distribution of PI(3,5)P2 at plasma membrane was observed in the Aβ-treated cells (Supplementary Fig. S7a). Therefore, our results suggest that Aβ-induced and SHIP2-mediated overproduction of PI(3,4)P2 and its abnormal accumulation at mature endosomes near perinuclear regions further alter normal distribution of other phosphoinositide PI(3,5)P2.

Aβ-mediated lysosomal pathway reduced the level of ARAP3

We observed the Aβ-induced alteration of phosphoinositides, in particular the accumulation of PI(3,4)P2 at mature endosomes. This can be related to the facilitation of lysosomal pathway of ARAP3. To test this hypothesis, we first introduced dominant negative mutant of dynamin DynK44A, which is essential for membrane fission during endocytosis. The reduction of the ARAP3 level by Aβ was indeed prevented when dynamin mutant K44A blocks the completion of the internalization of endocytic vesicles (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. S8a), suggesting that the Aβ-induced endocytosis is important for the decreased ARAP3 level. Furthermore, we applied a selective inhibitor of vacuolar H+ ATPase, bafilomycin A1, which blocks acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes. The results showed that the Aβ-induced decrease in ARAP3 level was completely prevented by the treatment of 100 nM bafilomycin (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. S8b). These results suggest that the reduced ARAP3 level is due to the protein degradation through Aβ-induced endocytosis and the following lysosomal pathway.

Decreased ARAP3 level causes RhoA hyperactivation and F-actin formation

To investigate the downstream effect of the Aβ-mediated decrease in ARAP3 level, we utilized RhoA biosensor based on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)39. Live-cell imaging with this RhoA FRET biosensor showed that RhoA activity was significantly increased by oligomeric Aβ (Fig. 5a,b), possibly by the reduced level of its negative regulator, ARAP3. In fact, this RhoA hyperactivation can be prevented by AS09 (Fig. 5a,b), which inhibits the SHIP2-mediated decrease in ARAP3 level (Fig. 3a,b). These results were further confirmed by ELISA assay for RhoA activity (Fig. 5c).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Aβ-induced RhoA hyperactivation and the accumulation of F-actin are dependent on SHIP2 activity. (a,b) Representative images (a) and the averaged values (b) of the FRET/CFP emission ratio images of RhoA biosensor in the HT22 cells stimulated with 1 μM of Aβ in the absence or presence of 10 μM AS09 for 24 hr (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 40~42 cells per group). (c) Active RhoA was quantified using ELISA-based RhoA activation assay (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 4). (d,e) Representative images (d) and the quantified intensity (e) of lifeact-mCardinal in HT22 cells treated with 1 μM Aβ in the absence or presence of 10 μM AS09 for 24 hr (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 80~88 cells per group). (f,g) Representative images (f) and the quantification analysis (g) of phalloidin after the stimulation with 1 μM of Aβ for 24 hr in HT22 cells overexpressing ARAP3 or R982A mutant (means ± SEM; t-test; *p < 0.05; n = 32~40 cells per group).

RhoA is a key regulator of actin dynamics by formation of filomentous actin (F-actin) structures46. Also, pathological actin in a polymerized conformation has been reported in several neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer’s disease41,47. Thus, we evaluated the degree of actin polymerization using mCardinal-tagged Lifeact, which allows detection of actin dynamics in live cells48. Our results showed that the level of actin polymerization was dramatically increased upon Aβ stimulation, and its enhancement was inhibited by the SHIP2 inhibitor AS09 (Fig. 5d,e).

To further confirm that this is due to SHIP2-mediated reduction in ARAP3 level, we introduced wild type ARAP3 or its negative mutant R982A to the HT22 cells treated with Aβ. Our results clearly showed that the Aβ-induced increase in F-actin was prevented by overexpression ARAP3, but not its mutant R982A (Fig. 5f,g). These results suggest that Aβ can induce the SHIP2-mediated accumulation of PI(3,4)P2-positive vesicles at mature endosomes, which reduces the level of ARAP3, mediating RhoA hyperactivation and F-actin formation (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

A model summarizing the Aβ-induced actin cytoskeletal abnormalities via SHIP2-PI(3,4)P2-ARAP3-RhoA signaling pathway.

Discussion

Abnormality in neuronal cytoskeleton is critical for neurotoxicity and synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease49. For example, neuronal microtubule is a major cytoskeleton composing axonal structure and thus pathological tau aggregation causes severe neurotoxicity in AD50. Neuronal actin is crucial for neurite dynamics and synaptic functions, and pathological accumulation of filamentous actin can result in synaptic dysfunctions in AD51. Therefore, underlying molecular mechanisms in the Aβ-induced disruption of neuronal cytoskeleton have been heavily investigated49,52. Particularly, a recent study reported the molecular links between Aβ and tau phosphorylation through FcγRIIb-mediated SHIP2 activation21.

Our current results provide important molecular links between Aβ and actin disruption, which can potentially influence synaptic dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s disease. Previous reports showed that Aβ pathology is associated with increased accumulation of F-actin via Rho GTPases36. We also confirmed that Aβ induces hyperactivation of RhoA, and further discovered that it can be due to the decreased expression level of a negative RhoA regulator ARAP3. Surprisingly, the reduction of ARAP3 was facilitated by elevated SHIP2 activity and its phospholipid product PI(3,4)P2. In particular, this over-produced PI(3,4)P2 was accumulated at the endocytic vesicles involved in the lysosomal pathway, leading to the reduction of ARAP3 level. Thus, our results provide new molecular mechanisms underlying the Aβ-mediated pathological actin polymerization.

Our results suggest that Aβ-induced actin disruption can be mediated by a lipid phosphatase SHIP2 and dysregulated phosphoinositide metabolism. Similar to our current results, it has been shown that Aβ influences the metabolism of PI(4,5)P2 by altering another lipid phosphatase synaptojanin19,20. In our study, the Aβ-induced and SHIP2-mediated production of PI(3,4)P2 caused the increase of endocytic vesicles (Fig. 1). This pathologically over-produced PI(3,4)P2 is surprisingly localized at late endosomes and lysosomal vesicles (Fig. 4b), while PI(3,4)P2 has been suggested to play a crucial role in the early stage of endocytosis3,8,11,15. Furthermore, this PI(3,4)P2-positive endosomes can physically interact with the PH domain of ARAP3 (Fig. 2) and this facilitates the degradation process of ARAP3 (Fig. 3). This is the first evidence that the accumulation of PI(3,4)P2 at mature endosomes can induce the degradation of ARAP3, which is crucial for the integrity and dynamics of actin cytoskeleton. These results are interesting because it has been generally known that the major lipid component of late endosomes and lysosomes is PI(3,5)P216. We further confirmed that the distribution of PI(3,5)P2 is also altered in the Aβ-treated cells (Fig. S7). Therefore, our results suggest that Aβ-induced dysregulation of phosphoinositide metabolism can alter the phosphoinositide component of endosomal vesicles at different stages.

ARAP3 is an interesting molecule known to interact with both phosphoinositides and their metabolizing enzyme SHIP228. In addition to direct interaction with SHIP2, ARAP3 can be present in a multimeric complex with SHIP2 and a Cbl-interacting protein CIN8528,53, which is important for receptor endocytosis54. ARAP3 also contains 5 PH domains, which is a well-known domain for phosphoinositide binding, and it has been shown that the N-terminal PH1 and PH2 domains bind to PI(3,4,5)P3, recruiting ARAP3 to plasma membrane35. Importantly, we further discovered that PH4 domains of ARAP3 may be crucial for its association to PI(3,4)P2 (Fig. 2), which can physically bring ARAP3 to the PI(3,4)P2-mediated lysosomal pathway.

An intriguing question is how PI(3,4)P2 is accumulated in the lysosomal endosomes. One possible mechanism is that over-produced PI(3,4)P2 makes it difficult to stay only in the early endosomes, allowing its distribution in the other stages of vesicles such as late endosomes. Another possible mechanism is that the conversion of PI(3,4)P2 to PI3P in the early endosome and/or PI3P to PI(3,5)P2 in the lysosomal endosomes are further unbalanced by Aβ. In fact, we observed altered distribution of PI(3,5)P2 (Fig. S7). Also, a recent study demonstrated that PI3P is deficient in the brain tissue from AD patients and AD mouse models55. These evidences imply more complex pathological mechanisms for the alteration of multiple phosphoinositide metabolism in AD. While we focused on the SHIP2-mediated over-production of PI(3,4)P2 and its effect on actin disruption in the current study, further systematic investigations utilizing advanced fluorescent biosensors will be needed to understand complex phospholipid metabolism altered in Alzheimer’s disease.

Taken together, we discovered new molecular mechanisms on how Aβ can cause the disruption of actin cytoskeleton through dysregulated phosphoinositide metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. We observed that the Aβ-induced accumulation of PI(3,4)P2 at mature endosomes facilitates the degradation of ARAP3, which causes actin disruption via RhoA hyperactivation. It is interesting that the Aβ-induced alteration of SHIP2 function has been previously shown to mediate tau phosphorylation as well. Because SHIP2 plays a central role in the Aβ-induced abnormality of both neuronal actin and microtubule, it can be considered as a powerful therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. In our study, we utilized fluorescent biosensors which can specifically monitor dynamic molecular events in live cells with high spatiotemporal resolutions. These advanced fluorescent biosensors and live-cell imaging technology will promise further discovery of dynamic molecular and pathological mechanisms of phospholipid metabolism.

Methods

Plasmids

To construct the mKate2-TAPP1-PH, BamHI-mKate2 and TAPP1-PH-Not1 were prepared by PCR with mKate2-P2A-APEX2-TAPP1-PH (Addgene number; #67662) as a template. These PCR products were inserted in pRK5 vector using In-Fusion technique (Takara). pTag-BFP-C-h-Rab5a-c-Myc (#79801), GFP-Rab7a (#61803), LAMP1-mGFP (#34831), and pEGFPN1-human Dynamin K44A (#22197) were obtained from Addgene. FRET-based RhoA biosensor is originally from Dr. Matsuda (Osaka University)39. mCherry-tagged ARAP3 and ARAP3-R982A were generated by fusing red fluorescent protein mCherry into the N-terminal of the ARAP3 templates34. To construct the EGFP-ARAP3-PH(X), each PH domain35 and EGFP sequences were prepared by PCR and inserted in pRK5 vector using In-Fusion technique. VN173-tagged TAPP1 was constructed by inserting PCR fragments of VN173 and TAPP1 PH domain in pRk5 vector. VC155-tagged ARAP3-PH(X) constructs were generated by Xba1/BamH1 replacement of EGFP in EGFP-ARAP3-PH(X) with a VC155 including Xba1/BamH1 site.

Reagents

PI(3,4)P2-diC16 (#P3416) and histone H1 carrier (#P-9C2) were purchased from Echelon. Bafilomycin A1 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Alexa 488 Phalloidin and Hoechst33342 were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. SHIP2 siRNA was purchased from Bioneer (#16333-1 and 16333-2).

Preparation of amyloid β oligomers

Aβ1-42 peptide (Bachem) was prepared as previously described42. Briefly, the lyophilized peptide was dissolved in ice-cold 1,1,1,3,3,3-Hexafluoro-2-Propanol (HFIP, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 2 hr at room temperature to allow for Aβ monomerization. HFIP was evaporated in a fume hood until a clear peptide film is observed. The peptide film can be incubated at −80 °C until use. Aβ stock solution was prepared from this peptide film by adding DMSO to a final concentration of 5 mM. For the experiment, Aβ1–42 stock solution was further diluted to 100 μM in PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C to achieve oligomeric Aβ solution.

Cell culture

Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 1 unit per ml penicillin, 100 μg per ml streptomycin. Cell culture reagents were purchased from Hyclone. Cells were cultured in a humidified 95% air, 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. The cells were transiently transfected with indicated constructs by LipofectamineTM 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacture’s protocol. Following incubation, the cells were maintained in neurobasal media (Gibco) containing B27 (Gibco), L-glutamine (Invitrogen) and penicillin/streptomycin, and then treated with 1 μM of oligomeric Aβ1–42 for 24 hr.

Cell viability assay

The EZ-cytox assay kit (Daeillab) was used to measure the cytotoxicity of Aβ. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plate at a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml in a volume of 100 μl/well. Following 24 hr of incubation, the cells were maintained in neurobasal media (Gibco) containing B27 (Gibco), L-glutamine (Invitrogen) and penicillin/streptomycin, and then treated with 1 μM of oligomeric Aβ1–42 for 24 hr. After incubation, 10 μl of WST reagent solution (water-soluble tetrazolium salt) was added to each well and plates were incubated for 1 hr at 37 °C. The absorbance of living cells was revealed at 450 nm using a microplate reader. The percentage of living cells was calculated in comparison to the control cells.

Image acquisition

For the fluorescence imaging, cells were prepared on cover-glass-bottom dishes (SPL Life Sciences) coated with 10 μg/ml of fibronectin (Invitrogen). FRET images were collected by a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope and a cooled charge-coupled device camera using NIS-Elements software (Nikon) with a 438DF24 excitation filter, a 458DRLP dichroic mirror, and two emission filters controlled by a filter changer (483DF32 for SECFP and 542DF27 for Venus). Red fluorescent images were collected using a 562DF40 excitation filter, a 593DRLP dichroic mirror, and a 641DF75 emission filter. Blue fluorescent images were acquired using a 377DF50 excitation filter, a 409 dichroic mirror, and a 447DF60 emission filter. Green fluorescent images and Venus images were collected using a 482DF35 excitation filter, a 506DRLP dichroic mirror, and a 536DF40 emission filter. A neutral-density filter was used to control the intensity of the excitation light. The fluorescence intensity of non-transfected cells was quantified as the background signals and subtracted from the SECFP and Venus signals on transfected cells. The pixel-by-pixel ratio images of FRET/SECFP were calculated based on the background-subtracted fluorescence intensity images of SECFP and Venus by the NIS-Elements program to allow the quantification and statistical analysis of FRET responses.

Immunostaining

After treatment of Aβ, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min. Cells were incubated in 5% BSA in PBS for 1 hr, and then incubated with rabbit anti-ARAP3 antibody (2 μg/ml, Atlas antibodies) or rabbit anti-PI(3,4)P2 antibody (1 μg/ml, Echelon) for overnight at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with Alex-Fluor 488 or 594 goat anti-rabbit antibody (diluted 1: 200, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 hours at room temperature in the dark. After another washing three times with PBS for 10 min each, samples were exposed to Hoechst33342 (1 μg/ml, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min. The stained cells were observed under a fluorescence microscopy.

Western blotting

The protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted with ARAP3 antibody (1 μg/ml, Atlas antibodies). The equal amount of protein loading was detected and normalized with β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) on the same membrane. We developed western blot membranes with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) solution and images were captured with a luminescent image analyzer ChemiDoc (Bio-Rad). The quantification of band intensity on the blot was analyzed with a software program, Image Lab 5.2.1 (Bio-Rad).

Intracellular delivery of PI(3,4)P2

The synthetic PI(3,4)P2-diC16-histone carrier complex (Echelon) was formed by incubating at room temperature for 15 min. The complex was diluted with neurobasal media and then added to the culture dishes. After 24 hr, cells were harvested in lysis buffer for western blotting.

RhoA ELISA activation assay

The ELISA-based RhoA activity assay (#BK124; Cytoskeleton) was used to measure the GTP-RhoA, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, HT22 cells were harvested in lysis buffer, immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C to avoid GTP hydrolysis. Equal amounts of proteins were added to the wells coated with RhoA GTP binding protein, and the plates were incubated on an orbital microplate shaker at 4 °C for 30 min. After washing, the strips were incubated with an anti-RhoA primary antibody for 45 min. After incubation, the strips were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 45 min followed by HRP detection reagent. The absorbance was revealed at 490 nm using a microplate reader. The activity of RhoA was averaged and normalized to the control samples.

Statistical analysis

P values were calculated by two-tailed Student’s t-test, and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (4.2MB, docx)
Supplementary Video 1 (2.7MB, mp4)

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Republic of Korea National Research Council of Science & Technology grant CRC-15-07-KIER, Brain Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2017M3C7A1043842), and KIST Institutional Grant 2V05820.

Author contributions

J.S. and H.N.L. designed research; H.N.L., K.M.S., H.K. and J.J. performed experiments; J.S., H.N.L., A.N.P., J.-B.P., H.R. analyzed data; J.S. and H.N.L. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-51914-2.

References

  • 1.Di Paolo G, De Camilli P. Phosphoinositides in cell regulation and membrane dynamics. Nature. 2006;443:651–657. doi: 10.1038/nature05185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Posor Y, et al. Spatiotemporal control of endocytosis by phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate. Nature. 2013;499:233–237. doi: 10.1038/nature12360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Posor Y, Eichhorn-Grunig M, Haucke V. Phosphoinositides in endocytosis. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2015;1851:794–804. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Antonescu CN, Aguet F, Danuser G, Schmid SL. Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate regulates clathrin-coated pit initiation, stabilization, and size. Molecular biology of the cell. 2011;22:2588–2600. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-04-0362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kelly BT, et al. Clathrin adaptors. AP2 controls clathrin polymerization with a membrane-activated switch. Science. 2014;345:459–463. doi: 10.1126/science.1254836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Perera RM, Zoncu R, Lucast L, De Camilli P, Toomre D. Two synaptojanin 1 isoforms are recruited to clathrin-coated pits at different stages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:19332–19337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609795104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cremona O, et al. Essential role of phosphoinositide metabolism in synaptic vesicle recycling. Cell. 1999;99:179–188. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81649-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marat AL, Haucke V. Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphates-at the interface between cell signalling and membrane traffic. The EMBO journal. 2016;35:561–579. doi: 10.15252/embj.201593564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nakatsu F, et al. The inositol 5-phosphatase SHIP2 regulates endocytic clathrin-coated pit dynamics. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;190:307–315. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201005018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xie J, Vandenbroere I, Pirson I. SHIP2 associates with intersectin and recruits it to the plasma membrane in response to EGF. FEBS letters. 2008;582:3011–3017. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.07.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kaksonen M, Roux A. Mechanisms of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2018;19:313–326. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daumke O, Roux A, Haucke V. BAR domain scaffolds in dynamin-mediated membrane fission. Cell. 2014;156:882–892. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Boucrot E, et al. Endophilin marks and controls a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway. Nature. 2015;517:460–465. doi: 10.1038/nature14067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schoneberg J, et al. Lipid-mediated PX-BAR domain recruitment couples local membrane constriction to endocytic vesicle fission. Nature communications. 2017;8:15873. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wallroth A, Haucke V. Phosphoinositide conversion in endocytosis and the endolysosomal system. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2018;293:1526–1535. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.000629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zolov SN, et al. In vivo, Pikfyve generates PI(3,5)P2, which serves as both a signaling lipid and the major precursor for PI5P. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:17472–17477. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203106109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kosicek M, Hecimovic S. Phospholipids and Alzheimer’s disease: alterations, mechanisms and potential biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:1310–1322. doi: 10.3390/ijms14011310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wong MW, et al. Dysregulation of lipids in Alzheimer’s disease and their role as potential biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:810–827. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berman DE, et al. Oligomeric amyloid-beta peptide disrupts phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate metabolism. Nature neuroscience. 2008;11:547–554. doi: 10.1038/nn.2100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu L, et al. Reduction of synaptojanin 1 accelerates Abeta clearance and attenuates cognitive deterioration in an Alzheimer mouse model. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288:32050–32063. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.504365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kam, T. I. et al. FcgammaRIIb-SHIP2 axis links Abeta to tau pathology by disrupting phosphoinositide metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease model. eLife5, 10.7554/eLife.18691 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Le Coq, J. et al. Structural basis for interdomain communication in SHIP2 providing high phosphatase activity. eLife6, 10.7554/eLife.26640 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Soeda Y, et al. The inositol phosphatase SHIP2 negatively regulates insulin/IGF-I actions implicated in neuroprotection and memory function in mouse brain. Molecular endocrinology. 2010;24:1965–1977. doi: 10.1210/me.2010-0163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rohrschneider LR, Fuller JF, Wolf I, Liu Y, Lucas DM. Structure, function, and biology of SHIP proteins. Genes &. development. 2000;14:505–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Prasad N, Topping RS, Decker SJ. Src family tyrosine kinases regulate adhesion-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of 5′-inositol phosphatase SHIP2 during cell attachment and spreading on collagen I. Journal of cell science. 2002;115:3807–3815. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brehme M, et al. Charting the molecular network of the drug target Bcr-Abl. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106:7414–7419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900653106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dyson JM, et al. The SH2-containing inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, SHIP-2, binds filamin and regulates submembraneous actin. The Journal of cell biology. 2001;155:1065–1079. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200104005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Raaijmakers JH, et al. The PI3K effector Arap3 interacts with the PI(3,4,5)P3 phosphatase SHIP2 in a SAM domain-dependent manner. Cellular signalling. 2007;19:1249–1257. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhuang G, Hunter S, Hwang Y, Chen J. Regulation of EphA2 receptor endocytosis by SHIP2 lipid phosphatase via phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-dependent Rac1 activation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2007;282:2683–2694. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608509200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Elong Edimo W, et al. SHIP2 controls plasma membrane PI(4,5)P2 thereby participating in the control of cell migration in 1321 N1 glioblastoma cells. Journal of cell science. 2016;129:1101–1114. doi: 10.1242/jcs.179663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hyvonen ME, et al. Lipid phosphatase SHIP2 downregulates insulin signalling in podocytes. Molecular and cellular endocrinology. 2010;328:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2010.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leone M, Cellitti J, Pellecchia M. The Sam domain of the lipid phosphatase Ship2 adopts a common model to interact with Arap3-Sam and EphA2-Sam. BMC structural biology. 2009;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6807-9-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Krugmann S, Williams R, Stephens L, Hawkins PT. ARAP3 is a PI3K- and rap-regulated GAP for RhoA. Current biology: CB. 2004;14:1380–1384. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jeon CY, et al. p190RhoGAP and Rap-dependent RhoGAP (ARAP3) inactivate RhoA in response to nerve growth factor leading to neurite outgrowth from PC12 cells. Experimental & molecular medicine. 2010;42:335–344. doi: 10.3858/emm.2010.42.5.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Craig HE, Coadwell J, Guillou H, Vermeren S. ARAP3 binding to phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-trisphosphate depends on N-terminal tandem PH domains and adjacent sequences. Cellular signalling. 2010;22:257–264. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mendoza-Naranjo A, Gonzalez-Billault C, Maccioni RB. Abeta1-42 stimulates actin polymerization in hippocampal neurons through Rac1 and Cdc42 Rho GTPases. Journal of cell science. 2007;120:279–288. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thomas CC, Dowler S, Deak M, Alessi DR, van Aalten DMF. Crystal structure of the phosphatidylinositol 3,4-bisphosphate-binding pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of tandem PH-domain-containing protein 1 (TAPP1): molecular basis of lipid specificity. Biochem J. 2001;358:287–294. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3580287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li H, Marshall AJ. Phosphatidylinositol (3,4) bisphosphate-specific phosphatases and effector proteins: A distinct branch of PI3K signaling. Cellular signalling. 2015;27:1789–1798. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nakamura T, Kurokawa K, Kiyokawa E, Matsuda M. Analysis of the spatiotemporal activation of rho GTPases using Raichu probes. Methods in enzymology. 2006;406:315–332. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)06023-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tsushima H, et al. HDAC6 and RhoA are novel players in Abeta-driven disruption of neuronal polarity. Nature communications. 2015;6:7781. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fulga TA, et al. Abnormal bundling and accumulation of F-actin mediates tau-induced neuronal degeneration in vivo. Nature cell biology. 2007;9:139–148. doi: 10.1038/ncb1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fa, M. et al. Preparation of oligomeric beta-amyloid 1-42 and induction of synaptic plasticity impairment on hippocampal slices. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE, 10.3791/1884 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Lemmon MA, Ferguson KM. Signal-dependent membrane targeting by pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. Biochem J. 2000;350(Pt 1):1–18. doi: 10.1042/bj3500001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kerppola TK. Design and implementation of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays for the visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:1278–1286. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ozaki S, DeWald DB, Shope JC, Chen J, Prestwich GD. Intracellular delivery of phosphoinositides and inositol phosphates using polyamine carriers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97:11286–11291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.210197897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Spiering D, Hodgson L. Dynamics of the Rho-family small GTPases in actin regulation and motility. Cell Adhesion &. Migration. 2014;5:170–180. doi: 10.4161/cam.5.2.14403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Heredia L, et al. Phosphorylation of actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin by LIM-kinase mediates amyloid beta-induced degeneration: a potential mechanism of neuronal dystrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2006;26:6533–6542. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5567-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Riedl J, et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat Methods. 2008;5:605–607. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bamburg JR, Bloom GS. Cytoskeletal pathologies of Alzheimer disease. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009;66:635–649. doi: 10.1002/cm.20388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Iqbal K, Liu F, Gong CX, Grundke-Iqbal I. Tau in Alzheimer disease and related tauopathies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7:656–664. doi: 10.2174/156720510793611592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pozueta J, Lefort R, Shelanski ML. Synaptic changes in Alzheimer’s disease and its models. Neuroscience. 2013;251:51–65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT. The intersection of amyloid beta and tau at synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2014;82:756–771. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kowanetz K, et al. CIN85 associates with multiple effectors controlling intracellular trafficking of epidermal growth factor receptors. Molecular biology of the cell. 2004;15:3155–3166. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Soubeyran P, Kowanetz K, Szymkiewicz I, Langdon WY, Dikic I. Cbl-CIN85-endophilin complex mediates ligand-induced downregulation of EGF receptors. Nature. 2002;416:183–187. doi: 10.1038/416183a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Morel E, et al. Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate regulates sorting and processing of amyloid precursor protein through the endosomal system. Nature communications. 2013;4:2250. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (4.2MB, docx)
Supplementary Video 1 (2.7MB, mp4)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES