Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2019 Oct 30;10:4952. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12984-y

Diamond growth from organic compounds in hydrous fluids deep within the Earth

Maria Luce Frezzotti 1,
PMCID: PMC6821813  PMID: 31666507

Abstract

At subduction zones, most diamonds form by carbon saturation in hydrous fluids released from lithospheric plates on equilibration with mantle rocks. Although organic molecules are predicted among dissolved species which are the source for carbon in diamonds, their occurrence is not demonstrated in nature, and the physical model for crustal diamond formation is debated. Here, using Raman microspectroscopy, I determine the structure of carbon-based phases inside fluid inclusions in diamond-bearing rocks from the Alps. The results provide direct evidence that diamond surfaces are coated by sp2-, and sp3-bonded amorphous carbon and functional groups of carboxylic acids (e.g., carboxyl, carboxylate, methyl, and methylene), indicating the geosynthesis of organic compounds in deep hydrous fluids. Moreover, this study suggests diamond nucleation via metastable molecular precursors. As a possible scenario, with carbon saturation by reduction of carboxylate groups, I consider tetrahedral H-terminated C groups as templates for the growth of sp3-structured carbon.

Subject terms: Geochemistry, Geodynamics, Petrology


Diamonds can give us clues to the processes regulating deep carbon transport within the Earth. Here, the author discovers evidence from diamond coatings that organic compounds exist at great depth in Earth’s interior, and furthermore, that organic molecules may provide scaffolds for diamond nucleation and growth.

Introduction

Diamonds account for tiny amounts of carbon from the Earth’s interior1,2, yet revealing their genesis is necessary for understanding large-scale processes in the evolution of our planet, such as geodynamics, volatile cycling, and redox state36. At subduction zones, where dense lithospheric plates sink to asthenospheric depths, diamond formation and carbon cycling are intrinsically related, since carbon fluxes inside the Earth are regulated by oxidized—dominantly hydrous—fluids (including supercritical aqueous-silicate intermediates) delivered by metamorphic decarbonation and dissolution of crustal carbonates710. In deep C-O-H fluids, the transition from carbon transport to carbon saturation—as diamond—requires equilibrium with slab or mantle rocks, controlled by those parameters that influence the solubility of carbon at high pressure (P) and temperature (T) (e.g., P = 3–5 GPa; T = 600–900 °C), including pH, redox conditions, structure of solutes in fluids, and buffering mineral assemblages in rocks5,1115. The formation of crustal metamorphic microdiamonds, therefore, is primarily governed by the nature of dissolved carbon-bearing ionic and molecular species.

In recent years, seminal work has revealed that CO2 does not regulate total carbon in hydrous fluids7,912 as hitherto generally accepted. High-pressure conditions can change carbon speciation substantially: aqueous carbonate ions can also be present, which would result, substantially, in a higher carbon solubility9,10. Further, modeling by thermodynamic calculations (Deep Earth Water model11) has recently predicted the rise of stability of organic acids11,12; at pressures above 5 GPa, formic acid can dissociate into molecular water and diamond. The question consequently arises if organic structures can be stable in hydrous fluids deep in the Earth and if these can trigger diamond formation. The existence of organic molecules in subduction fluids would bear far-reaching implications for the genesis of diamonds, for carbon speciation in deep fluids, and for the potential for prebiotic compounds in the Earth.

By using Raman microspectroscopy, I studied the structure and composition of carbon-bearing phases in fluid inclusions present in metamorphic rocks from Lago di Cignana16 (western Alps), where microdiamonds were previously discovered9. Compared to experimental or theoretical studies, the analysis of fluid-containing inclusions has the advantage of examining a direct sample of diamond-forming media encapsulated within minerals17. Fluid inclusions can retain the natural products, frozen in, on carbon saturation. The results show that significant amounts of carboxylic acids are dissolved in aqueous fluids released from deeply subducting slabs, and how they contribute to the nucleation and growth of diamonds.

Results

Diamond-bearing fluid inclusions in metasediments

The diamond-bearing ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) ophiolitic slice of Lago di Cignana (western Alps) has several characteristics, which are very appropriate to study diamond formation in subduction zones. In brief, the UHP metamorphic complex represents a fragment of an exhumed metamorphic complex of crustal origin subducted to a depth of 100 km, or more, during Alpine oceanic subduction16 about 35 Ma ago. The host metamorphic rocks are of oceanic affinity, contrarily to the commonly reported continental origin of diamond-bearing UHP metamorphic rocks18,19. Diamond crystallization occurred by precipitation from an oxidized hydrous fluid buffered by redox equilibrium with surrounding slab rocks9,20, which is preserved in fluid inclusions.

The UHP metamorphic complex formed at P ≥ 3.2 GPa and relatively low T (i.e., 600 °C)16 and consists of glaucophane eclogites from original oceanic-crust basalts, and a metasedimentary cover series (e.g., quartz-rich micaschists and quartzites)16,18. The microdiamonds occur in nodules and boudinaged layers of Mn-rich garnetites within micaschists and quartzites, which likely reflect Mn nodules and metasediments16,21. Diamonds are also observed within primary fluid inclusions distributed in garnet cores (Fig. 1a). These inclusions are the focus of the present study. They are tiny (<1–25 µm), dominantly aqueous, two or three-phase inclusions (L + S ± V) (Fig. 1b). The vapor bubble, when present, resulted from a volume increase, due to inclusion stretching on host-rock exhumation (refer to Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). In inclusions, fluid-precipitated daughter mineral phases include—along with rare diamond—carbonates, rutile, salts, and quartz (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Table 1). Dissolved carbonate and bicarbonate ions, silica monomers, and chlorides are detected in liquid water9,20 (see Supplementary Note 1). The relative abundances of dissolved and precipitated carbon species reveal high concentrations of carbon and an oxidized nature of diamond-forming fluids equilibrated with oceanic-crust rocks, which is in agreement with the experimental data on carbon solubility at the considered PT conditions (dissolved C = 0.1–0.3 wt%)7.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Photomicrographs of diamond-bearing fluid inclusions in garnetites from Lago di Cignana (W Alps). a Distribution of fluid inclusions in garnet cores (grt; blue dotted line). b Aqueous fluid inclusions containing diamond (dmd), Mg-calcite (Mg-cc), and rutile (rt); stacked microphotograph

Raman study of diamonds

Under the Raman analysis, most diamonds (≤1–2 µm in size) contained inside inclusions show crystalline structure revealed by the sp3-hybridized mode at 1332 cm−1 (ref. 22), identical to previously studied microdiamonds from this locality9 (Table 1). In several fluid inclusions, however, diamonds spectra show several additional bands arising from other non‐diamond forms of carbon, whose attribution requires deconvolution and band fitting (for a detailed account of the Raman study, refer to Methods and Supplementary Note 2). The Raman spectra of these diamonds are shown in Figs. 2 and 3. Two prominent bands, D and G, located around 1360 and 1580 cm−1, are from poorly ordered sp2-bonded carbon23 (Fig. 2a–f; Table 2). The G band corresponds to the vibration of carbon atoms in sp2 sites, completed by the intense and broad D band originating from distinct modes of disorder in aromatic ring structures23,24. Besides, a band around 1520–1560 cm−1 (Fig. 2a–d) argues for the presence of an amorphous, probably hydrogenated, carbon fraction in the sp2 and sp3 configurations24, whereas two bands at around 1160 and 1440 cm−1 (Fig. 2c–e) indicate terminations with trans-polyacetylene [trans-(CH)n] segments23,25. A few spectra show the presence of metastable diamond polytypes (sharp peaks in the 1280–1350 cm−1 region in Fig. 2e). As shown in Fig. 2, intensity and number of Raman bands reveal a variable sp2/sp3 carbon ratio. With increasing amorphous and disordered sp2-bonded carbon content (from 0.1 to 8% sp2-bonded C fraction; see Methods and Table 3), the diamond peak is shifted (1334 and 1328 cm−1), suppressed, and broadened (full-width at half-peak maximum (FWHM) from 6 to 10.6 cm−1) (spectra a to d in Fig. 2; Table 1). These features suggest a diamond size in the order of hundreds of nanometers26. In nano-sized (<1 µm) diamond spectra, a broad band centered around 1220–1226 cm−1 (spectra a and b in Fig. 2) suggests even smaller diamonds or abundant planar defects27,28.

Table 1.

Raman features of diamonds in fluid inclusions: Raman data of diamonds in garnet for comparisona

Diamonds in fluid inclusions Diamonds in garnet
Sample no. FI no. Diamond (cm−1) FWHM (cm−1) FI size (µm) Sample no. FI no. Diamond (cm−1) FWHM (cm−1) dmd size (µm)
D2AG B1e 1331 9 8 3C2GC 1D 1330.8 9.1 3
M2G M5 1331 9 8 3C2GC 3D 1332 6.1 2
E2CG M6 1332 4 10 E2CG M3 1333 7.5 2
M2G A8 1333 6.1 16 3C2G H2 1332.5 6 3
M2G B2 1332 4.5 5 3C2G H4 1331 7 3
M2G B6 1332 4.8 7 3C2G H5 1331 4.5 3
M2G C1 1330 7.6 20 E2CG M1 1332.5 4.5 3
M2G C6 1333.7 6.1 4 3C2G M2 1331 4 4
M2G C7 1332 8.4 10 3C2G E6 1331 2.5 3
D2AG A1 1328 10.6 6 3C2BG A1 1333 7.6 4
D2AG A2 1331 4 6 3C2BG A5 1332 5 5
D2AG B1 1331.5 10.6 6 3C2BG A6a 1333 4 4
G2C D2 1330.8 6.1 10 3C2BGa 6b 1333 3.5 4
G2C D5 1334 6.1 18 3C2G M2 1331 6 2
G2C D6 1332.4 9.1 15
G2C E4 1331 4.6 6
G2C E5 1328 7.6 6
G2C E7 1330 6.1 4
G2C E8 1331 6 4
G2C E9 1328 7.6 5
ALC2 B2 1328 8 6
ALC2 B5 1329.5 8 7
ALC2 B6 1329 8 5
3C2G D5 1334 6 12
M2G C3 1333 14 12

FI fluid inclusion, FWHM full-width at half-maximum, dmd diamond

aData are from refs. 9,20

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Raman spectra showing the structure of carbon-based species in diamonds. a A nano-sized diamond with a shell of sp2 and sp3 amorphous carbon, as confirmed by the presence of a broad band at 1224 cm−1 (green band profile). A contribution from surface C=O groups (pink band profiles) is observed. b A crystalline nano-sized diamond (peak at 1330 cm−1) with amorphous carbon at the surface. c, d Microdiamonds, with variable through minor contribution from amorphous carbon, show termination with (CH)n segments (blue band profiles). e A crystalline microdiamond coexists with other diamond polytypes (red dotted band profiles in the 1300–1350 cm−1 region). f The microdiamond (1 µm) shows almost no contribution from surface sp2-bonded carbon. Grt = host garnet; Cc = calcite

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Raman spectrum showing surface organic functional groups in diamonds. a The Raman spectrum is showing surface functional group vibrations in a nano-sized diamond (red band profile at 1226 cm−1) covered by a shell of sp2-bonded carbon. COO groups are revealed by two broad bands centered at around 1720 and 1856 cm−1 (pink band profiles). b The bands lying from 2800 to 3000 cm−1 correspond to C-H vibrations in (CH2)n and (CH3)n groups (dark blue and light blue band profiles, respectively). The fitted band at 2896 cm−1 (black band profile) corresponds to both (CH2)n and (CH3)n groups vibrations. c A schematic model showing the structure of nano-sized diamond surfaces revealed by Raman spectra. The crystalline diamond surface is covered by sp2-bonded carbon and organic functional groups

Table 2.

Band-fitting parameters as derived from Raman spectra of carbon-based phases measured in diamonds inside fluid inclusions

Sample no. FI no. Diamond (cm−1) sp2-disordered C (cm−1) sp2–sp3 a-C (cm−1) Transpoly acetylene groups (cm−1) sp3 (CHx)n Methylene, Methyl groups (cm−1) Carboxyl, Carboxilate groups (cm−1)
Cubic Defect Met. D FWHM G FWHM a-C CHn CH2 CH2/CH3 CH3 C=O in acid and anhydride
M2B B3 1214 1349 180 1577 82 1522
M2B B5 1223 1351 226 1576 87 1525
D2AG B1 1331 1224 1365 134 1579 87 1524
G2C I10 1220 1378 174 1594 98 1520 1728 1862
G2C D1 1222 1364 167 1591 80 1525
G2C E1 1226 1348 94 1580 77 1531 1464 1720 1856
G2C C1 1223 1364 168 1591 80 1526
ALC2 B2 1328 1361 60.5 1586 16 1566 1440 2849 2896 2881 1723
ALC2 B5 1330 1284 1365 34 v.w. 1565 1159 2847 2880.6
1301
ALC2 B6 1329 1283 1360 68 1588 11 1565 1161 1478 2850 2897 2881
1299 2923 2961
M2B C7 1332 1368 79 1599 56 1530 1451
G2C D5 1334 1374 70.2 1590 87 1162 1443
G2C E4a 1331 1375 57 1600 50 1154 1443
G2C E4b 1333 1378 38 1583 1443
D2AG B1c 1332 1346 80 1583 69
ALC2 1 1364 89 1584 80
M2B C1 1330 1374 112 1583 93
M2B C3 1333 1220 1363 110 1589 68
3D2AG A1 1328 1368 90.2 1564 64
D2AGB1 E1 1329 1370 90.6 1565 73

FI fluid inclusion, FWHM full-width at half-maximum height, met. metastable, a-C  amorphous C, v.w. very weak

Table 3.

Calculated fraction of disordered sp2-structured carbon in diamonds

Sample no. FI no. sp2 C fraction (%)
sp2/sp2 + sp3
M2B C1 0.11
M2B C3 2.28
D2AG B1 8.63
D2AGB1 E1 0.30
G2C D1 6.66
M2B C7 0.71
ALC2 B6 3.63
G2C 5D 0.09
G2C E4 0.05
D2AGB 1C 4.90
3D2AG A1 0.11

FI fluid inclusion

None of the analyzed Raman bands of sp2-bonded carbon correspond to metamorphic graphite23,29,30 (see Supplementary Note 2). The structural analysis of poorly ordered and amorphous carbon coating nano-sized diamonds can be interpreted from fitted bands (Table 2) following the three-stage amorphization-trajectory model of Ferrari and Robertson23, where the increasing disorder is revealed by the variation of the position of the G band, and by the relative intensity ratio of the D and G bands. The relative integrated intensity ratio ID/IG for the D and G band pair goes from dominantly nano-crystalline disordered graphitic clusters in microdiamonds (Fig. 2f) to nano-crystalline disordered graphitic clusters and amorphous sp2 and sp3 carbon in nano-sized diamonds (Fig. 2b, c).

A few nano-sized diamonds coated by conspicuous disordered and amorphous carbon in the sp2 and sp3 configurations (Fig. 2a–d) show Raman modes of attached functional groups, whose width and featureless nature suggest organic compounds (refer to Supplementary Note 2; Fig. 3; Table 2). Organic functional groups are unevenly recorded in spectra as they do not have fixed sites on the diamond surface. Two bands at around 1724 and 1860 cm−1 (Fig. 3a; Table 2) are the signature of the fundamental stretching of the carbonyl group (C=O) in organic acids and acid anhydrides31. The presence of methyl (CH3)n and methylene (CH2)n radicals is revealed by asymmetric and symmetric C-H stretching bands in the spectral region between 2840 and 2930 cm−1 (Fig. 3b; Table 2; refs. 32,33). Hydration and hydroxylation on the surface have not been observed, since O-H stretching (3200–3800 cm–1) and bending (1650 cm−1) water bands34,35 are absent in the diamond spectra (Fig. 3).

Surface reactivity of diamonds reveals organic species

Raman analyses provide direct evidence that nano-sized diamonds show hybrid structures, constituted by a diamond core with thin outer domains consisting of non-diamond forms of carbon and organic functional groups (Fig. 3c). To further analyze the results obtained, it is necessary to consider the specific features of the surface species and the development of the reactions on pristine diamond surfaces. Previous studies reveal that nanodiamonds contain a large number of dangling carbon atoms at the surface, depending on surface characteristics, crystallographic faces, and density of impurities36,37. As a consequence, the surfaces are highly unstable and adsorb a variety of chemical groups (e.g., carboxyl, anhydride, lactone, methyl, methylene) from the crystallization medium, and spontaneously reconstruct to form sp2-bonded amorphous or graphitic carbon shells or clusters, in order to attain equilibrium3641. On the other hand, nanodiamond surface modifications could also result by exposure to a solvent at relatively lower temperature27,42. For example, thermal annealing in vacuum, H2, He, or N2, primarily produces sp2 amorphous (or graphitic) carbon and H-bonded carbon on surfaces, while O-bonded carbon species disappear (e.g., T > 200 °C; refs. 4345).

Alternatively, oxidation in air, CO2, or aqueous phase increases the content of oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., O-H, C=O, COOH; T < 400 °C), and induces dehydrogenation and removal of sp2 carbon from the surface27,41,42,46. To be consistent with surface oxidation in water at low temperature, the Raman bands of H-bonded carbon groups and nano-crystalline and amorphous sp2/sp3 carbon must show an explicit reduction. However, carboxyl and carboxylate group bands (≅1700–1900 cm−1) increase with increasing methyl and methylene radicals (≅2800–3000 cm1) and sp2 (or sp2/sp3)-bonded carbon (≅1300–1600 cm−1) (Figs. 2a, 3), thus suggesting that (C=O)-containing surface species cannot result purely from transformation by hydroxyl radicals in aqueous fluids. Moreover, bands arising from O-H groups (e.g., the O-H bend at around 1650 cm−1), which form by reaction with or on adsorption from water, are not observed (Figs. 2 and 3a; refs. 34,35). Thus, diamonds appear to have been stable against H2O in the fluid inclusions during the retrograde cooling path, and at ambient conditions.

Consequently, based on the present analyses, I conclude that the organic functional groups on the surfaces of Lago di Cignana diamonds were generated by adsorption or reaction with dissolved chemical species in the crystallization fluids at conditions relevant to deep subduction zone environment. The specificity of coexisting O- and H-bonded organic functional groups suggests that they should be part of the same molecule47, such as complex carboxylic acids or acid anhydrides. In newly formed nano-sized diamonds, the high reactivity of surface carbon atoms could have also induced the conversion of defective sp3-bonded carbon into graphitic or sp2–sp3 amorphous carbon surface domains3941,45,48 (Fig. 3c). These processes, which reduce the total surface energy, might have inhibited physical or chemical interaction with solvent hydrous fluids at lower temperature37,45.

Discussion

The discovery of sub-structures of carboxyl, carboxylate, and sp3-hybridized (CHx)n groups (x = 2, 3) in Lago di Cignana diamonds is pivotal as it provides, for the first time, confirmatory evidence that carboxylic acids can be stable and quantitatively significant in hydrous fluids at pressures of 3 GPa12. At mantle conditions, the geosynthesis of organic molecules is expected to be thermodynamically favored by the gradients of pH and redox potential11,12 that prevail in the Lago di Cignana metamorphic units. Carbon saturation could have been catalyzed when hydrous fluids started to equilibrate with the buffering slab-rock minerals (variation of fO2fluid∕rock is buffered by EMOD [enstatite + magnesite][forsterite + diamond] equilibrium9,20). Therefore, the present results suggest that high-pressure decomposition of carboxylic acids induced carbon saturation in fluids by chemoselective reduction49 of the carboxylate group and oxidation of Fe2+ in the rock (e.g., garnet), such as:

RCOOH+3H++2Fe2+R+C+2Fe3++2H2O, 1

where R is any number of sp3-hybridized (CHx)n groups (x = 2, 3), and the approximate oxidation state of carbon in carboxylate groups is assumed to be +2 (ref. 49). Such a model mass-balance reaction does not exclude that diamonds might have also formed from aqueous inorganic carbon9. However, carbon in organic molecules should be more readily reduced than it would be carbon bonded in CO2-bearing ions or molecules, which is more oxidized and of lower chemical potential12.

One physical model for diamond nucleation and growth at the P–T conditions of Lago di Cignana UHP metamorphic complex (P ≥ 3.2 GPa; T = 600 °C), consistent with present observations, is schematically illustrated in Fig. 4. In deep hydrous fluids, the carboxylate groups from organic acids could have released the initial C0 in a bond-breaking event induced by fluid/rock reaction (Eq. 1) (stage I in Fig. 4). It can be assumed that diamond nuclei formed in precursor amorphous—presumably hydrogenated—carbon clusters with the structure of mixed sp3 + sp2 bonding. As the concentration of carbon atoms in the fluid gradually increased, the conversion of precursor phases was possibly favored by tetrahedral sp3-bonded (CHx)n structural groups acting as a template, leading to the formation of diamond-structured carbon lattices50,51. At this initial step of nucleation (stage II in Fig. 4), the presence of hydrogen-terminated radicals could have been relevant to stabilize dangling bonds of carbon on the surface of C particles, hence facilitating further sp3-structured carbon growth. These processes led to the crystallization of nano-sized diamonds still containing a relevant fraction of disordered to amorphous sp2 and sp3 carbon and organic functional groups (stage III in Fig. 4), in some cases along with other diamond polytypes (Fig. 2e). This stage of growth completeness could have rearranged, probably by progressive desorption of H, to form crystalline diamonds up to a few micrometers in size with a shell of sp2-bonded carbon, often terminated by trans-(CH)n (stage IV in Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Schematic formation pathway for diamonds from dissolved organic and inorganic carbon compounds in deep hydrous fluids. (I) Carbon saturation (C0) on the reduction of carboxyl-containing groups from dissolved organic acids and formation of disordered sp2-, sp3-bonded amorphous carbon as an intermediate state preceding the crystallization of diamond. (II) Early stages of nucleation of crystalline diamonds facilitated by tetrahedrally coordinated radical structural intermediates. (III) Further growth brings to nano-sized diamonds coated by disordered sp2 carbon, and amorphous sp2, sp3 carbon. Metastable diamond polytypes can also form. (IV) Crystalline microdiamonds with almost no sp2-bonded disordered carbon

The formation mechanism for crustal diamonds that emerges from the present study is consistent with nucleation models via metastable molecular precursors recently proposed for nano-crystal synthesis5154. In particular, a nucleation pathway with tetrahedral H-terminated C groups acting as templates, before forming the sp3-structured C phase, resonates with Gebbie et al.51 experiments of diamond gas synthesis using diamondoid molecules as protonuclei. Their observation that diamond nucleation occurred through metastable, hydrogen-terminated diamond-like carbon clusters (e.g., pentamantane) led to propose a different molecular nucleation mechanism where the nucleation energetic barrier is orders of magnitude lower than that generally assumed by classical models51. The similarity with laboratory synthesis seemingly supports that a part of crustal diamonds may have nucleated at pressures outside the actual stability field of diamond55. Data do not suggest a shallow origin for diamonds, however. The growth of diamond and non-diamond phase mixtures up to a few micrometers across still requires high pressure and temperature conditions.

Pinning down the diversity of geochemical processes, which lead to the transport, or fixation (as diamond), of carbon at mantle conditions is understandably extremely challenging. Present results highlight the wide variety of soluble carbon species that can be present in deep aqueous fluids at subduction zones. It is generally accepted that subduction diamonds form through reduction of CO2 and carbonate ions present in hydrous media79. Present results prove that P, T, and pH conditions, occurring during high-pressure fluid/rock redox evolution, promote the formation of organic molecules11,12, in the absence of biologically catalyzed processes56. Given the chemical reactions and physical processes proposed for diamond formation, the presence of carbon–hydrogen intermediates would appear as a needed requirement to provide templates facilitating nucleation and growth.

Taken together, the results presented in this research show bridge-building pathways between geochemistry and organic geochemistry. Miller57 first reported organic compounds produced by abiotic synthesis under Primitive-Earth atmosphere conditions. More recently, studies of chemical reactions, which could have been significant for the prebiotic evolution on Earth, have been mostly based on organic compounds and water present in hydrothermal vents at oceanic spreading centers, and meteorites5862 (i.e., carbonaceous chondrites). For example, plausible models have been proposed where exogenous organic molecules were delivered intact to Earth, during the period of heavy bombardment from about 3.8 to 4.5 Gy ago63,64. Thus, the discovery of organic molecules, where carbon is bonded by oxygen and hydrogen, in deep hydrous fluids can constitute a relevant—presently unconsidered—carbon reservoir in the Earth’s mantle. It remains unknown whether organic molecules might ultimately lead to sugars and other building blocks of life at these extreme conditions. Nonetheless, the diamond formation pathway revealed by the present study adds a new endogenous perspective to the appearance of the simplest forms of biochemical compounds in the Earth.

Methods

Sample preparation

Five double-polished rock sections of about 100 µm thickness were selected for the Raman study of carbon-based phases contained inside unopened fluid inclusions located at 10 to 20 µm depth below the sample surface. Using well-established techniques, the rock section polishing was performed with alumina paste. Textural features of the host rock and fluid inclusions were characterized using a petrographic microscope.

Raman microspectroscopy

Microstructural and chemical in situ analysis of carbon-based phases inside aqueous fluid inclusions was performed using a Labram confocal Raman microscope (Horiba Scientific, Japan). The polarized Raman spectra were excited using two green Ar-ion lasers operating at 514 and 532 nm, respectively. Raman scattering excited by visible light is more sensitive to π-bonds formed by sp2-hybridized orbitals. Thus, using green laser lines, sp2 carbon cross-section results about 55 times more intense than that of sp3-bonded carbon65. I did not use a ultraviolet (UV) laser line (244 nm), which provides similar excitation for both sp2 and sp3 carbon bonds, because of the insufficient penetration of UV laser below the sample surface.

Raman spectra acquisition was performed with a backscattered geometry by focusing the laser beam inside fluid inclusions to a depth of 20 µm below the sample surface by means of a transmitted light Olympus B40 microscope. A ×100 objective (numerical aperture [NA] = 0.90) with a long-working distance was used for all the acquisitions to increase spatial resolution (<1 µm) allowing analyses of sub-micrometer phases. Raman scattering intensity of an individual crystalline phase depends on its volume, and decreases of orders of magnitude when crystals have sizes smaller than the laser spot size. In order to analyze nanometer-sized diamonds (<1 µm), confocal geometry of the Raman system was maintained under 1 µm (xy direction) and 2 µm (z-direction) to allow spatially resolved analyses, with significant reduction, or absence, of scattering from the host garnet, and liquid and solid phases contained in fluid inclusions (see Fig. 2), depending on their scattering properties.

The maximum intensity of Raman diamond band was obtained from the focal spot position in the middle of the crystal. With the pinhole between 50 and 100 µm, the Raman vibrational modes of diamond completely disappeared at focal spot locations more than 2 to 3 µm away, along the xy direction, depending on diamond size. For nano-sized diamonds with weak Raman scattering, spectra were collected for variable acquisition times (from 5 to 180 s) and 1 to 3 acquisitions to get the best signal-to-noise ratio36. In order to prevent decomposition of structural groups eventually present on diamond surfaces, the laser power has been maintained low, generally below 50–70 mW. The spectrometer was calibrated using a natural diamond standard. The optimization of the spectral resolution was achieved by varying the slit width from 100 to 150 µm. Band central position accuracy of 1.5 cm−1 was obtained by combining a 600 g/mm diffraction grating and the long focal length of the spectrograph at 700 mm.

Statistical analysis of Raman spectra

Raman spectra were baseline corrected and processed by statistical analysis (Fityk software; ref. 66) The envelope of the whole spectrum was deconvoluted into single-band profiles using a Voigt pseudo function, which is a convolution of a Lorentzian with a Gaussian line shape67. In that way, the central position of the bands is defined with an accuracy better than 0.2 cm−1, and the integrated intensity and width of single bands are adapted to the mixed spectrum. Selected Raman spectra are shown in Figs. 2, 3 and detailed information about parameters collected for each Raman band analyzed (e.g., intensity, area, and width) can be found in Tables 13.

When diamond spectra showed sp2-bonded carbon vibrations, the sp2 carbon fraction was calculated as

sp2sp2+sp3=IG55×ID+IG×100#, 2

where IG is the intensity of G band within the range 1560–1590 cm−1, and ID is the intensity of the diamond peak at 1332 cm−1 corrected for the weaker scattering at the considered laser lines65,68.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File (437.4KB, pdf)
Supplementary Information (589.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Marco Orlandi for insightful discussions on organic redox reactions. This research was supported by the Italian MIUR: (1) PRIN grant (no. 2017LMNLAW) and (2) Progetto Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018–2022. Raman facilities were provided by the Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Ambiente e della Terra, Università Milano-Bicocca.

Author contributions

M.L.F. solely performed analyses and contributed to the writing of this article.

Data availability

The source data are provided in Tables 13 and in Supplementary Table 1. Raw Raman spectra are available from the author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Maya Kopylova, Nico Küter and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-12984-y.

References

  • 1.Shirey SB, et al. Diamonds and the geology of mantle carbon. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2013;75:355–421. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2013.75.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haggerty SE. A Diamond Trilogy: superplumes, supercontinents, and supernovae. Science. 1999;285:851–860. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5429.851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dasgupta R, Hirschmann MM. The deep carbon cycle and melting in Earth’s interior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010;298:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.06.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Malaspina N, et al. The oxidation state of mantle wedge majoritic garnet websterites metasomatised by C-bearing subduction fluids. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2010;298:417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2010.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wood BJ, Bryndzia LT, Johnson KE. Mantle oxidation state and its relationship to tectonic environment and fluid speciation. Science. 1990;248:337–345. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4953.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ridgwell A, Zeebe R. The role of the global carbonate cycle in the regulation and evolution of the Earth system. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2005;234:299–315. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kelemen PB, Manning CE. Reevaluating carbon fluxes in subduction zones, what goes down, mostly comes up. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E3997–E4006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507889112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dobrzhinetskaya LF, Wirth R, Green HW. A look inside of diamond-forming media in deep subduction zones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:9128–9132. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609161104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frezzotti M-L, Selverstone J, Sharp ZD, Compagnoni R. Carbonate dissolution during subduction revealed by diamond-bearing rocks from the Alps. Nat. Geosci. 2011;4:703–706. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Manning CE. Thermodynamic modeling of fluid-rock interaction at mid-crustal to upper-mantle conditions. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2013;76:135–164. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2013.76.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sverjensky DA, Stagno V, Huang F. Important role for organic carbon in subduction-zone fluids in the deep carbon cycle. Nat. Geosci. 2014;7:909–913. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sverjensky DA, Huang F. Diamond formation due to a pH drop during fluid–rock interactions. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8702. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dasgupta R. Ingassing, storage, and outgassing of terrestrial carbon through Geologic time. Rev. Miner. Geochem. 2013;75:183–229. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2013.75.7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kerrick DM, Connolly JAD. Metamorphic devolatilization of subducted marine sediments and the transport of volatiles into the Earth’s mantle. Nature. 2001;411:293–296. doi: 10.1038/35077056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palyanov YN, et al. Mantle–slab interaction and redox mechanism of diamond formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:20408–20413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313340110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Groppo C, Beltrando M, Compagnoni R. The P–T path of the ultra-high pressure Lago di Cignana and adjointing high-pressure meta-ophiolitic units: insights into the evolution of the subduction Tethyan slab. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2009;27:207–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2009.00814.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Frezzotti ML, Ferrando S. The chemical behavior of fluids released during deep subduction based on fluid inclusions. Am. Miner. 2015;100:352–377. doi: 10.2138/am-2015-4933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dobrzhinetskaya LF. Microdiamonds—frontier of ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism: a review. Gondwana Res. 2012;21:207–223. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2011.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carswell, D. A. & Compagnoni, R. in Ultrahigh Pressure Metamorphism (eds Carswell, D. A. & Compagnoni, R.) 3–9 (Eotvos Univ. Press, Budapest, 2005).
  • 20.Frezzotti ML, Huizenga J-M, Compagnoni R, Selverstone J. Diamond formation by carbon saturation in C–O–H fluids during cold subduction of oceanic lithosphere. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2014;143:68–86. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.12.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reinecke T. Prograde high- to ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism and exhumation of oceanic sediments at Lago di Cignana, Zermatt-Saas zone, Western Alps. Lithos. 1998;42:147–190. doi: 10.1016/S0024-4937(97)00041-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Prawer S, Nemanich RJ. Raman spectroscopy of diamond and doped diamond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. 2004;362:2537–2565. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2004.1451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ferrari AC, Robertson J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B. 2000;61:14095–14107. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ferrari AC, Robertson J. Raman spectroscopy of amorphous, nanostructured, diamond-like carbon, and nanodiamond. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2004;362:2477–2512. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2004.1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shibahara S, Yamane M, Ishikawa K, Takezoe H. Direct synthesis of oriented trans-polyacetylene films. Macromolecules. 1998;31:3756–3758. doi: 10.1021/ma971677i. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yoshikawa M, et al. Raman scattering from nanometer‐sized diamond. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1995;67:694–696. doi: 10.1063/1.115206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Osswald S, Yushin G, Mochalin V, Kucheyev SO, Gogotsi Y. Control of sp2/sp3 carbon ratio and surface chemistry of nanodiamond powders by selective oxidation in air. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:11635–11642. doi: 10.1021/ja063303n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zaitsev, A. M. Optical Properties of Diamond 502 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2001).
  • 29.Beyssac O, Goffé B, Chopin C, Rouzaud JN. Raman spectra of carbonaceous material in metasediments; a new geothermometer. J. Metam. Geol. 2002;20:858–712. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1314.2002.00408.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Perraki M, Proyer A, Mposkos E, Kaindl R, Hoinkes G. Raman microspectroscopy on diamond, graphite and other carbon polymorphs from the ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic Kimi Complex of the Rhodope Metamorphic Province, NE Greece. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006;241:672–685. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bell WC, Booksh KS, Myrick ML. Monitoring anhydride and acid conversion in supercritical/hydrothermal water by in situ fiber-optic Raman Spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 1998;70:332–339. doi: 10.1021/ac9707141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Williams OA, et al. Size-dependent reactivity of diamond nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2010;4:4824–4830. doi: 10.1021/nn100748k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rong L, et al. C-H stretching vibrations of methyl, methylene and methine groups at the vapor/alcohol (n = 1–8) interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:14118–14129. doi: 10.1021/jp051565q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mochalin V, Osswald S, Gogotsi Y. Contribution of functional groups to the Raman spectrum of nanodiamond powders. Chem. Mater. 2009;21:273–279. doi: 10.1021/cm802057q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Frezzotti ML, Tecce F, Casagli A. Raman spectroscopy for fluid inclusion analyses. J. Geochem. Expl. 2012;112:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2011.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Evans, S. iin The Properties of Natural and Synthetic Diamond (ed. Field, J. E.) 181–214 (Academic Press, London, 1992).
  • 37.Vadym N, Mochalin, Shenderova O, Ho D, Gogotsi Y. The properties and applications of nanodiamonds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012;7:11–23. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Barnard AS, Russo SP, Snook IK. Structural relaxation and relative stability of nanodiamond morphologies. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2003;12:1867–1872. doi: 10.1016/S0925-9635(03)00275-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cebik J, et al. Raman spectroscopy study of the nanodiamond-to-carbon onion transformation. Nanotechnology. 2013;24:205703. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/24/20/205703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mitev DP, Townsend AT, Paull B, Nesterenko PN. Direct sector field ICP-MS determination of metal impurities in detonation nanodiamond. Carbon. 2013;60:326–334. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shenderova, O. A., & Gruen, D. M. (eds.). Ultrananocrystalline Diamond: Synthesis, Properties and Applications 2nd edn, 578 (William Andrew Publisher, Norwich, 2012).
  • 42.Lin Y, Sun X, Su DS, Centi G, Perathoner S. Catalysis by hybrid sp2/sp3 nanodiamonds and their role in the design of advanced nanocarbon materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018;47:8438–8473. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00684A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kuznetsov, V. L. & Butenko, Y. V. in Synthesis, Properties and Applications of Ultrananocrystalline Diamond 199–216 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2005).
  • 44.Zeiger, M., Jäckel, N., Mochalin, V. N., Presser, V. Review: carbon onions for electrochemical energy storage, J. Mater. Chem. A. 4, 3172 (2016)
  • 45.Petit T, Arnault J-C, Girard HA, Sennour M, Bergonzo P. Early stages of surface graphitization on nanodiamond probed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:233407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.233407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mangolini F, McClimon JB, Rose F, Carpick RW. Accounting for nanometer-thick adventitious carbon contamination in X-ray absorption spectra of carbon-based materials. Anal. Chem. 2014;86:12258–12265. doi: 10.1021/ac503409c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tsubota T, Tanii S, Ida S, Nagata M, Matsumoto Y. Chemical modification of diamond surface with CH3(CH2)nCOOH using benzoyl peroxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003;5:1474–1480. doi: 10.1039/b210248j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Butenko VL, et al. Kinetics of the graphitization of dispersed diamonds at “low” temperatures. J. Appl. Phys. 2000;88:4380. doi: 10.1063/1.1289791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry 1495 (Wiley, New York,1992).
  • 50.May PW. Diamond thin films: a 21st-century material. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A. 2000;358:473–495. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2000.0542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gebbie MA, et al. Experimental measurement of the diamond nucleation landscape reveals classical and nonclassical features. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;155:8284–8289. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803654115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Loh ND, et al. Multistep nucleation of nanocrystals in aqueous solution. Nat. Chem. 2017;9:77–82. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lutsko JF, Durán-Olivencia MA. A two-parameter extension of classical nucleation theory. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2015;27:235101. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/23/235101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Legg BA, De Yoreo JJ. The energetics of prenucleation clusters in lattice solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 2016;145:211921. doi: 10.1063/1.4964489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Simakov SK. Nano- and micron-sized diamond genesis in nature: an overview. Geosci. Front. 2018;9:1849–1858. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Martin WF, Sousa FL, Lane N. Energy at life's origin. Science. 2014;344:1092–1093. doi: 10.1126/science.1251653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Miller SL. A production of amino acids under possible primitive Earth conditions. Science. 1953;117:528–529. doi: 10.1126/science.117.3046.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shock EL. Geochemical constraints on the origin of organic compounds in hydrothermal systems. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 1990;20:331–367. doi: 10.1007/BF01808115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Konn C, et al. Hydrocarbons and oxidised organic compounds in hydrothermal fluids from Rainbow and Lost City ultramafic-hosted vents. Chem. Geol. 2009;258:299–314. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.10.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lang SQ, Butterfield DA, Schulte M, Kelley DS, Lilley MD. Elevated concentrations of formate, acetate and dissolved organic carbon found at the Lost City hydrothermal field. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2010;74:941–952. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.10.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Peltzer ET, Bada JL. a-Hydroxycarboxylic acids in the Murchison meteorite. Nature. 1978;272:443–444. doi: 10.1038/272443a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cronin JR, Pizzarello S, Epstein S, Krishnamurthy RV. Molecular and isotopic analyses of the hydroxy acids, dicarboxylic acids, and hydroxydicarboxylic acids of the Murchison meteorite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1993;57:4745–4752. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90197-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chyba CF, Thomas PJ, Brookshaw L, Sagan C. Cometary delivery of organic molecules to the Early Earth. Science. 1990;249:366–373. doi: 10.1126/science.11538074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chyba CF, Sagan C. Endogenous production, exogenous delivery and impact-shock synthesis of organic molecules: an inventory for the origins of life. Nature. 1992;355:125–132. doi: 10.1038/355125a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wada N, Solin SA. Raman efficiency measurements of graphite. Phys. B. 1981;105:353–356. doi: 10.1016/0378-4363(81)90274-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wojdyr M. Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program. J. Appl. Cryst. 2010;43:1126–1128. doi: 10.1107/S0021889810030499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sundius T. Computer fitting of Voigt profiles to Raman lines. J. Raman Spectr. 1973;1:471–488. doi: 10.1002/jrs.1250010506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ferrari A, Robertson J. Nanostructured carbon for advanced applications. J. Nano. Car. Adv. Appl. 2001;24:177. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Peer Review File (437.4KB, pdf)
Supplementary Information (589.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The source data are provided in Tables 13 and in Supplementary Table 1. Raw Raman spectra are available from the author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES