S. pastorianus, an S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrid, is used for production of lager beer, the most produced alcoholic beverage worldwide. It emerged by spontaneous hybridization and colonized early lager brewing processes. Despite accumulation and analysis of genome sequencing data of S. pastorianus parental genomes, the genetic blueprint of industrially relevant phenotypes remains unresolved. Assimilation of maltotriose, an abundant sugar in wort, has been postulated to be inherited from the S. cerevisiae parent. Here, we demonstrate that although Asian S. eubayanus isolates harbor a functional maltotriose transporter SeAGT1 gene, they are unable to grow on α-oligoglucosides, but expression of S. cerevisiae regulator MAL13 (ScMAL13) was sufficient to restore growth on trisaccharides. We hypothesized that the S. pastorianus maltotriose phenotype results from regulatory interaction between S. cerevisiae maltose transcription activator and the promoter of SeAGT1. We experimentally confirmed the heterotic nature of the phenotype, and thus these results provide experimental evidence of the evolutionary origin of an essential phenotype of lager brewing strains.
Keywords: Saccharomyces eubayanus, α-oligoglucoside metabolism, heterosis, domestication, experimental evolution sequencing, brewing, hybridization
ABSTRACT
Saccharomyces pastorianus strains are hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus that have been domesticated for centuries in lager beer brewing environments. As sequences and structures of S. pastorianus genomes are being resolved, molecular mechanisms and evolutionary origins of several industrially relevant phenotypes remain unknown. This study investigates how maltotriose metabolism, a key feature in brewing, may have arisen in early S. eubayanus × S. cerevisiae hybrids. To address this question, we generated a nearly complete genome assembly of Himalayan S. eubayanus strains of the Holarctic subclade. This group of strains has been proposed to be the S. eubayanus subgenome origin of current S. pastorianus strains. The Himalayan S. eubayanus genomes harbored several copies of an S. eubayanus AGT1 (SeAGT1) α-oligoglucoside transporter gene with high sequence identity to genes encountered in S. pastorianus. Although Himalayan S. eubayanus strains cannot grow on maltose and maltotriose, their maltose-hydrolase and SeMALT1 and SeAGT1 maltose transporter genes complemented the corresponding null mutants of S. cerevisiae. Expression, in Himalayan S. eubayanus of a functional S. cerevisiae maltose metabolism regulator gene (MALx3) enabled growth on oligoglucosides. The hypothesis that the maltotriose-positive phenotype in S. pastorianus is a result of heterosis was experimentally tested by constructing an S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus laboratory hybrid with a complement of maltose metabolism genes that resembles that of current S. pastorianus strains. The ability of this hybrid to consume maltotriose in brewer’s wort demonstrated regulatory cross talk between subgenomes and thereby validated this hypothesis. These results support experimentally the new postulated hypothesis on the evolutionary origin of an essential phenotype of lager brewing strains and valuable knowledge for industrial exploitation of laboratory-made S. pastorianus-like hybrids.
IMPORTANCE S. pastorianus, an S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrid, is used for production of lager beer, the most produced alcoholic beverage worldwide. It emerged by spontaneous hybridization and colonized early lager brewing processes. Despite accumulation and analysis of genome sequencing data of S. pastorianus parental genomes, the genetic blueprint of industrially relevant phenotypes remains unresolved. Assimilation of maltotriose, an abundant sugar in wort, has been postulated to be inherited from the S. cerevisiae parent. Here, we demonstrate that although Asian S. eubayanus isolates harbor a functional maltotriose transporter SeAGT1 gene, they are unable to grow on α-oligoglucosides, but expression of S. cerevisiae regulator MAL13 (ScMAL13) was sufficient to restore growth on trisaccharides. We hypothesized that the S. pastorianus maltotriose phenotype results from regulatory interaction between S. cerevisiae maltose transcription activator and the promoter of SeAGT1. We experimentally confirmed the heterotic nature of the phenotype, and thus these results provide experimental evidence of the evolutionary origin of an essential phenotype of lager brewing strains.
INTRODUCTION
Saccharomyces pastorianus is an interspecific hybrid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus (1–4). S. pastorianus strains are widely used for production of lager beer, which is currently the most produced alcoholic beverage worldwide. Lager brewing requires alcoholic fermentation at relatively low temperatures. S. pastorianus was hypothesized to have emerged by spontaneous hybridization and to have colonized early lager brewing processes due to a combination of cold tolerance inherited from S. eubayanus and superior fermentation kinetics inherited from S. cerevisiae (5–7). Lager beer is brewed from barley wort, whose sugar composition consists, by weight, of approximately 15% glucose, 60% maltose, and 25% maltotriose (8). During wort fermentation, maltotriose is generally utilized only after glucose and maltose are depleted, while its consumption is also relatively slow and often incomplete (9–11).
Complete sugar utilization is desirable for lager beer fermentation to optimize concentrations of ethanol and flavor compounds and to avoid residual sweetness (12). While S. pastorianus and S. cerevisiae strains are capable of consuming maltotriose, none of the wild isolates of S. eubayanus characterized thus far have been shown to possess this trait (6, 13, 14). These observations led to the hypothesis that the ability of S. pastorianus to ferment maltotriose was inherited from S. cerevisiae (5–7, 13, 15).
The genetic information for maltose utilization is well conserved in Saccharomyces species and depends on three gene families. MALT genes encode plasma membrane proton symporters with various substrate specificities and affinities (16, 17); MALS genes encode α-glucosidases that hydrolyze α-oligoglucosides into glucose, while MALR genes encode a regulator required for transcriptional induction of MALT and MALS genes by maltose (18, 19). In Saccharomyces species, maltose utilization genes are generally organized in MAL loci. These loci contain a MALT gene (called ScMALx1 and SeMALTx in S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus, respectively), a MALS gene referred to as ScMALx2 or SeMALSx, and an MALR gene referred to as ScMALx3 or SeMALRx (13, 20). In the absence of glucose and presence of maltose, the MalR regulator binds a bidirectional promoter, thereby simultaneously activating expression of MALT and MALS genes (21).
The ScMAL1-ScMAL4 and ScMAL6 loci of S. cerevisiae as well as the SeMAL1-SeMAL4 loci of S. eubayanus are located in subtelomeric regions (13, 22–24). While all S. cerevisiae ScMalx1 transporters transport maltose, only ScMal11 is able to also transport maltotriose (9). ScMAL11 (also known as ScAGT1) shares only 57% nucleotide identity with other ScMALx1 genes (25). The four SeMALT (SeMALT1 to SeMALT4) genes identified in the genome of the Patagonian type strain FM1318/CBS 12357 of S. eubayanus were shown to encode functional maltose transporters, but none of these genes enabled maltotriose transport (13). While no clear ScAGT1 ortholog was found in S. eubayanus CBS 12357T, such an ortholog was recently found in the genomes of two North American isolates assigned to the Holarctic subclade of S. eubayanus (14).
S. pastorianus inherited MAL genes from both S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus (2, 4, 26). However, the S. cerevisiae-derived maltotriose transporter gene ScAGT1 is truncated and, therefore, nonfunctional in S. pastorianus (10). Instead, maltotriose consumption by S. pastorianus strains was attributed to SeAGT1 and S. pastorianus MTY1 and MTT1 genes (27–30). In S. pastorianus, SeAGT1 is located on S. eubayanus chromosome XV (ChrXV) and was, therefore, already before the identification of an AGT1 ortholog in Holarctic S. eubayanus strains (14), assumed to originate from S. eubayanus (2). SpMTY1, also referred to as SpMTT1, is located on S. cerevisiae ChrVII and has less than 92% sequence identity with other Saccharomyces maltose transporters (28). However, SpMTY1 contains sequence patches with high similarity to maltose transporters from S. eubayanus and Saccharomyces paradoxus (32). Recently, two independent laboratory evolution studies with S. eubayanus demonstrated that recombination of different SeMALT genes yielded chimeric, neo-functionalized genes that encoded maltotriose transporters (14, 32). SpMTY1 may have resulted from successive introgressions of maltose transporter genes from S. cerevisiae, S. eubayanus, and S. paradoxus.
Recently made S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus laboratory hybrids showed lager brewing performance similar to that of S. pastorianus strains, also with respect to maltotriose utilization (5, 6, 15, 33). In these hybrids, maltotriose consumption depended on the presence of a functional ScAgt1 transporter encoded by the S. cerevisiae subgenome (34). However, in view of the nonfunctionality of ScAGT1 in current S. pastorianus strains, these laboratory hybrids did not fully recapitulate the genetic landscape of S. pastorianus with respect to maltotriose fermentation (2, 6, 33).
Studies on laboratory hybrids based on S. eubayanus strains whose genomes are more closely related to the S. eubayanus subgenome of S. pastorianus strains than that of the Patagonian type strain CBS 12357 might generate new insights into the evolution of maltotriose utilization in S. pastorianus. To date, Himalayan S. eubayanus isolates show the highest sequence identity with the S. eubayanus subgenome of S. pastorianus, with up to 99.82% identity, in contrast to 99.56% for S. eubayanus CBS 12357T (35).
Here, we investigated if and how the genomes of Himalayan S. eubayanus strains could have contributed to maltotriose utilization in the earliest hybrid ancestors of current S. pastorianus strains. To this end, we generated chromosome-level genome assemblies of these strains by long-read DNA sequencing. Since the Himalayan strains were unable to utilize maltotriose, we functionally characterized the assembled MAL genes and identified genetic determinants that prevented maltotriose utilization. Subsequently, a laboratory hybrid of a representative Himalayan S. eubayanus strain with a maltotriose-deficient ale strain of S. cerevisiae was generated to investigate the genetics of maltotriose utilization in a hybrid context. We discuss the implications of the experimental results for the proposed role and origin of SeAGT1 in S. pastorianus and for the potential of hybridization to enable maltotriose consumption in novel Saccharomyces hybrids.
RESULTS
Sequencing of Himalayan S. eubayanus strains revealed variations of subtelomeric regions and the presence of novel putative maltose transporter genes.
It has been proposed that the S. eubayanus genetic pool of S. pastorianus was inherited from an ancestor of the Asian S. eubayanus lineage (35). With 99.82% identity, the Himalayan S. eubayanus strains CDFM21L.1 and ABFM5L.1 that belong to the Holarctic lineage (36) present the closest characterized relatives of the S. eubayanus ancestor of lager brewing yeasts. However, this distance was based on a limited sequencing space (35), and the analysis did not investigate the presence of specific S. eubayanus genetic markers found in S. pastorianus hybrids. Therefore, we sequenced the genome of the Himalayan S. eubayanus strain CDFM21L.1 with a combination of long-read and short-read techniques (Oxford Nanopore MinION and Illumina technologies, respectively) to generate a nearly complete draft reference genome sequence. The resulting CDFM21L.1 genome assembly comprised 19 contigs, including the mitochondrial genome. All chromosomes were completely assembled from telomere to telomere, except for chromosome XII, which was fragmented into 3 contigs due to the repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) region and manually assembled into a single scaffold. With a total size of 12,034,875 bp, this assembly represents the first nearly complete draft genome of an S. eubayanus strain of the Holarctic clade (36).
Chromosome-level assemblies were hitherto only available for the Patagonia B-clade strain CBS 12357T (1, 13). We identified three major structural differences in CDFM21L.1 relative to the structure of CBS 12357T using Mauve (37): (i) a paracentric inversion in the subtelomeric region of chromosome VII involving approximately 8 kbp, (ii) a translocation of approximately 12 kbp from the left subtelomeric region of chromosome VIII to the right subtelomeric region of chromosome VI, and (iii) a reciprocal translocation between approximately 20 kbp from the right subtelomeric region of chromosome V and approximately 60 kbp from the center of chromosome XII (Fig. 1A). All structural variation involved subtelomeric regions, in accordance with their known relative instability (38–40).
An alignment comparison of the CDFM21L.1 and CBS 12357T genomes with MUMmer revealed that 557 kb were unique to CDFM21L.1, and, reciprocally, 428 kb were unique to CBS 12357T. Sequences unique to CBS 12357T (3.6% of its genome) and to CDFM21L.1 (4.6% of its genome) were located primarily in subtelomeric regions and in repetitive regions, such as rDNA on chromosome XII (Fig. 1B). Out of the 32 subtelomeric regions, 23 exhibited absence of synteny. Conserved synteny was observed for subtelomeric regions on ChrIII (left), ChrIV (left and right), ChrVI (left), ChrIX (right), ChrXI (right), ChrXII (right), ChrXIV (left), and ChrXV (right) (see File S1 and Table S1 in the supplemental material).
The 428 kb of sequence that was absent in the Himalayan S. eubayanus strain included 99 annotated open reading frames (ORFs) (File S1). Of the 99 ORFs that were (partly) affected, 11 were completely absent in CDFM21L.1, involving mostly genes implicated in iron transport facilitation (File S1). The 557 kb of sequence that was not present in CBS 12357T included 113 annotated ORFs (File S1). Of these 113 ORFs, 15 were completely absent in CBS 12357T. These 15 ORFs showed an overrepresentation of genes involved in transmembrane transport (Fisher’s exact test, P = 4.8E−5) (Fig. 1C).
Of the 15 ORFs unique to CDFM21L.1, three were identical orthologs of S. cerevisiae MAL11 (AGT1) (Table S1). These three ORFs were found in the subtelomeric regions of chromosomes VII, XIV, and XV. Their sequence similarity values with the S. cerevisiae CEN.PK113.7D and S. pastorianus CBS 1483 MAL11 and AGT1 genes were 82.7% and 99.89%, respectively. In addition to these SeAGT1 genes, the CDFM21L.1 genome sequence harbored genes encoding three maltose transporters (SeMALTx), two maltases (SeMALSx), and three regulators (SeMALRx). In contrast to the situation in S. eubayanus CBS 12357T, none of the SeMAL genes formed a canonical MAL locus in CDFM21L.1 (Fig. 2). A systematic sequence inspection of these CDFM21L.1 SeMAL genes revealed mutations that prematurely interrupted the reading frames of SeMALR1ChrV (706TGA708), SeMALT2ChrXII (694TGA696), and SeMALT3ChrXIII (1045TAA1047).
In addition to the S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1 strain, a second Himalayan S. eubayanus isolate (ABFM5L.1) was sequenced. These two strains were 99.97% genetically identical at the nucleotide level, their MAL genes were syntenic, and the premature stop codons in SeMALR1 (ChrV), SeMALT2 (ChrXII), and SeMALT3 (ChrXIII) were conserved. Two additional mutations were identified in one of the three SeAGT1 genes. A nucleotide variation at positions 53 and 939 (T instead of an A and A instead of a G) resulted in a glycine-to-valine and arginine-to-lysine change, respectively.
Paradoxically, Himalayan S. eubayanus strains do not utilize maltose and maltotriose.
Identification of SeAGT1 in the two Himalayan S. eubayanus strains suggests an ability to grow not only on maltose but also on maltotriose. Strains from the Holarctic clade have previously been hypothesized to be the donor of the S. eubayanus subgenome in S. pastorianus hybrids (35, 36). However, no physiological data regarding their ability to grow on the sugars present in wort are available. To assess their growth characteristics, the Asian S. eubayanus strains CDFM21L.1 and ABFM5L.1, the Patagonian S. eubayanus type strain CBS 12357T, and the S. pastorianus strain CBS 1483 were grown on diluted industrial brewer’s wort at 12°C. As reported previously, S. pastorianus strain CBS 1483 could utilize all three sugars but did not fully consume maltotriose (Fig. 3) (11). Also in accordance with previous observations (6), CBS 12357T consumed glucose and maltose completely but left maltotriose untouched. However, in marked contrast to S. eubayanus CBS 12357T, neither CDFM21L.1 nor ABFM5L.1 consumed maltose after growth on glucose. Moreover, like CBS 12357T, maltotriose was not metabolized by these two S. eubayanus strains. While in CBS 12357T an ability to grow on maltose and an inability to grow on maltotriose could be readily attributed to its MAL gene complement, CDFM21L.1 and ABFM5L.1 failed to grow on maltose even though they appeared to contain complete genes encoding maltose (SeMALT1 and SeAGT1) and maltotriose (SeAGT1) transporters.
Growth defects on maltose and maltotriose are caused by deficiency of the regulatory SeMalR proteins in S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1.
The recent characterization of maltose metabolism in CBS 12357T showed that the coding regions of transcriptionally silent maltose transporter genes in S. eubayanus can potentially encode functional proteins (13). The inability of the Himalayan S. eubayanus isolates to grow on α-oligosaccharides precluded direct testing of transporter gene functionality by deletion studies. Instead, these genes were expressed in S. cerevisiae IMZ616, which is devoid of all native maltose metabolism genes (41). The CDFM21L.1 transporter gene SeMALT1, SeMALT2, SeMALT3, or SeAGT1 was integrated at the ScSGA1 locus in IMZ616 along with the S. cerevisiae maltase gene ScMAL12 (13), yielding a series of strains overexpressing a single transporter [(IMX1702 (SeMALT1), IMX1704 (SeMALT2), IMX1706 (SeMALT3), and IMX1708 (SeAGT1)]. These strains, as well as the negative- and positive-control strains IMZ616 and IMX1365 (IMZ616 expressing ScAGT1 and ScMAL12), were grown on synthetic medium (SM) supplemented with either maltose (SMM) or maltotriose (SMMt). On maltose, not only the positive-control strain IMX1365 but also IMX1702 (SeMALT1) and IMX1708 (SeAGT1) were able to grow on maltose, consuming 30 and 60%, respectively, of the initially present maltose after 100 h (Fig. 4A). As anticipated, the SeMALT2 and SeMALT3 alleles with premature stop codons did not support growth on maltose. Of the two strains that grew on maltose, only IMX1708 (SeAGT1) also grew on maltotriose. These results demonstrate that SeAGT1 from a Holarctic S. eubayanus encoded a functional maltotriose transporter and, consequently, that the inability of Holarctic strains to grow on maltose and maltotriose was not caused by transporter dysfunctionality. In addition to transport, metabolism of α-oligoglucosides requires maltase activity. Functionality of the putative SeMALS1 and SeMALS2 maltase genes was tested by constitutive expression in strain IMZ616, together with a functional ScMAL31 transporter gene, yielding strains IMZ752 and IMZ753, respectively. The maltase-negative strain IMX1313 was used as negative control. In SM with maltose, both IMZ752 (SeMALS1) and IMZ753 (SeMALS2) grew and completely consumed maltose within 65 h, demonstrating functionality of both hydrolase genes (Fig. 4C).
In S. cerevisiae transcriptional regulation of MALx2 and MALx1 genes is tightly controlled by a transcription factor encoded by MALx3 genes. Malx3 binds an activating site located in the bidirectional promoters that control expression of MALx2 and MALx1 genes (42, 43). To test whether absence of maltose consumption in Himalayan S. eubayanus strains was caused by a lack of transcriptional upregulation of SeMALT and SeMALS, the S. cerevisiae ScMAL13 gene was integrated at the SeSGA1 locus in S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1, under the control of a constitutive ScPGK1 promoter and ScTEF2 terminator. ScMAL13 expression in CDFM21L.1 enabled growth on maltose and maltotriose (Fig. 5A), indicating that a lack of transcriptional upregulation was indeed the cause of the parental strain’s inability to grow on these oligoglucosides. However, consumption of maltose and maltotriose was incomplete, and consumed sugars were almost exclusively respired, as no ethanol was measured after 60 h of cultivation.
The possibility to grow an engineered variant of S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1 on α-oligoglucosides offered an opportunity to study transporter function in its native context. Complementary functional characterization by gene deletion of SeMALT1 and SeAGT1 was performed using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing method (13, 44). Deletion of SeMALT1 and SeAGT1 in CDFM21L.1 resulted in strains IMK820 and IMK823, respectively. Complete deletion of SeAGT1 required disruption of six alleles. To confirm the complete removal of all copies, the genome of IMK823 was sequenced. Mapping reads onto the reference S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1 genome assembly confirmed that all six alleles were removed simultaneously. Subsequently, the regulator expression cassette (ScPGK1p-ScMAL13-ScTEF2t) was integrated in IMK820 and IMK823 at the SeSGA1 locus, yielding strains IMX1939 and IMX1940, respectively (Fig. 5B). The four deletion strains IMK820 (SemalT1Δ), IMK823 (Seagt1Δ), IMX1939 (SemalT1Δ Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13), and IMX1940 (Seagt1Δ Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13) were characterized on SM with glucose (SMG), SMM, or SMMt. All four strains were able to grow on glucose (Fig. S1). While strains IMK820, IMK823 and IMX1940 were unable to grow on maltose or maltotriose (Fig. 5C), strain IMX1939 (SemalT1Δ Sesga1Δ::SeMAL13), which harbored functional SeAGT1 copies, grew on maltose as well as on maltotriose. However, after 64 h of growth, these sugars were only partially consumed. Only 1.2 g liter−1 ethanol was produced from maltose, and no ethanol formation was observed during growth on maltotriose. The low ethanol concentration and the relatively high optical density at 600 nm (OD660) suggest that, under the experimental conditions, strain IMX1939 exhibited a Crabtree-negative phenotype and exclusively respired maltotriose. S. eubayanus IMX1940 (Seagt1Δ Sesga1Δ::SeMAL13) did not consume maltotriose after 84 h of incubation. Moreover, despite the presence of SeMALT1, which encoded a functional maltose transporter upon expression in S. cerevisiae IMZ616, strain IMX1940 was also unable to consume maltose.
In addition to a functional Malx3 transcription factor, transcriptional activation of MAL genes also requires presence of a cis-regulatory motif in the promoter of regulated genes. Transcriptome analysis of S. eubayanus CBS 12357T recently showed that absence of a canonical cis-regulatory motif in SeMALT1 and SeMALT3 of S. eubayanus CBS 12357T caused a deficiency in their expression (13). To further explore regulation of SeMAL and SeAGT1 genes, we investigated the impact of carbon sources on the genome-wide transcriptome and, specifically, on transcriptional activation of genes involved in maltose metabolism. Duplicate cultures of S. eubayanus strain IMX1765 (ScPGK1p-ScMAL13-ScTEF2t) were grown on SMG, SMM, and SMMt at 20°C and sampled in mid-exponential phase. After mRNA isolation and processing, sequencing reads were mapped onto the newly annotated S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1 genome to calculate the number of fragments per kilobase per million reads mapped for the gene of interest (FPKM). The heterologous regulator ScMAL13, expressed from the constitutive ScPGK1 promoter (ScPGK1p) displayed the same expression levels in glucose- and maltose-grown cultures. Although ScMAL13 was efficiently expressed on glucose, none of the nine S. eubayanus maltose genes (the three identical SeAGT1 copies being undistinguishable) were transcriptionally induced under these conditions (Fig. 6 and Table S2), confirming that the hierarchical regulatory role of glucose catabolite repression (42, 45) also takes place in S. eubayanus. During growth on maltose, all nine genes were significantly upregulated relative to levels in glucose-grown cultures, but large variations in expression levels were observed. The maltase genes SeMALS1 and SeMALS2 and the transporter gene SeAGT1 showed the highest upregulation, with fold changes of 148, 161, and 2,355 respectively. Although upregulated SeMALT1 displayed a fold change of 13, its normalized expression in maltose-grown cultures was 886-fold lower than that of SeAGT1. This weaker upregulation might explain why, despite the ability of its coding region to support synthesis of a functional maltose transporter, SeMALT1 alone could not restore growth on maltose. The transcriptome data also revealed that the absence of maltose induction in CDFM21L.1 was not associated with defective cis-regulatory elements in SeMALR promoter sequences since the regulator genes were properly activated; instead, these results would suggest that the SeMalR regulators are not functional.
Hybridization of two maltotriose-deficient S. eubayanus and S. cerevisiae lineages results in heterosis through regulatory cross talk.
The genetic makeup of S. pastorianus lager brewing yeasts strongly indicates that they originate from hybridization of S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus parental lineages that were both unable to metabolize maltotriose (2). This hypothesis is consistent with the recurrent mutation in the S. cerevisiae AGT1 allele of S. pastorianus strains as well as with the inability of Himalayan strains of S. eubayanus to grow on these oligoglucosides.
Spores of the Himalayan S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1 were hybridized with S. cerevisiae CBC-1. This top-fermenting S. cerevisiae is recommended for cask and bottle conditioning and unable to consume maltotriose (Lallemand, Montreal, Canada). Analysis of the CBC-1 assembly, obtained by a combination of long- and short-read sequencing, linked its maltotriose-negative phenotype to a total absence of the MAL11 (AGT1) gene. The resulting laboratory interspecific hybrid HTSH020 was characterized at 12°C on synthetic wort, a defined medium whose composition resembles that of brewer’s wort. While S. eubayanus CDFM21L.1 consumed only glucose and S. cerevisiae CBC-1 consumed glucose and maltose after 103 h (Fig. 7A), the interspecific hybrid HTSH020 completely consumed glucose and maltose and partially consumed maltotriose after 105 h, thus resembling characteristics of S. pastorianus strains (e.g., CBS 1483) (11). In addition to this gain of function, the hybrid HTSH020 outperformed both of its parents in maltose consumption since it depleted this sugar in 70 h instead of the 95 h for strain CBC-1. Since S. cerevisiae grows generally more slowly at 12°C, the experiments were also performed at 20°C, at which temperature HTSH020 consumed all maltose 16 h earlier than CBC-1 (Fig. S2).
Transcriptome analysis of the hybrid strain HTSH020 grown on SM with different carbon sources showed that SeAGT1 expression was repressed during growth on glucose, with a normalized expression level of 7 FPKM (Fig. 7B). When grown on SM with maltose, SeAGT1, SeMALS1, and SeMALS2 were significantly induced, with fold increases of 816, 109, and 116, respectively (Fig. 7B and Table S3). Although SeMALT1 and SeMALT2 were induced, these transporters do not contribute to maltose metabolism due to truncation of their ORFs. These transcriptome data demonstrated that SeAGT1 and SeMALS genes are induced by regulatory cross talk between regulators encoded from the CBC-1 S. cerevisiae subgenome and maltotriose transporter genes harbored by the S. eubayanus genome. This laboratory hybridization experiment may be the closest reproduction yet of how, centuries ago, maltotriose fermentation capacity arose in the first hybrid ancestor of S. pastorianus.
DISCUSSION
The ability to consume maltose and maltotriose represents a key performance indicator of S. pastorianus lager brewing strains (10). This study demonstrates how mating of S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus strains that cannot themselves ferment maltotriose can yield maltotriose-fermenting hybrids. This laboratory study illustrates how, centuries ago, maltotriose fermentation capacity may have arisen in the first hybrid ancestor of S. pastorianus.
While the origin of the S. eubayanus parent of S. pastorianus strains is still under debate (46–48), phylogenetic analysis suggested a Far East Asian origin (35). However, this interpretation was based on a limited sequencing space and was constrained by the quality of available sequence assemblies. Since an ortholog of SeAGT1 had previously been found only in the S. eubayanus subgenome of S. pastorianus strains, this finding revived the discussion on the geographical origin of the ancestral S. eubayanus parent (14). The high-quality, annotated genome assemblies of the Himalayan S. eubayanus strains CDFM21L.1 and ABFM5L.1 presented in the present study revealed several copies of SeAGT1, whose very high sequence identity with S. pastorianus SeAGT1 is consistent with the previously proposed Asian origin of the S. eubayanus subgenome of S. pastorianus (14, 35, 36). Next, genome sequence comparison of the Patagonian B subclade S. eubayanus strain CBS 12357T and the Holarctic subclade strain CDFM21L.1 revealed homoplasy of SeAGT1, probably reflecting that these subclades evolved in different ecological niches. The variation in genes encoding iron transport facilitators between the Patagonian and Himalayan S. eubayanus lineages further supports this idea of a difference of the natural habitat of these yeasts. The abundance of these transporters in CBS 12357T could indicate a lower iron concentration in the environment of Patagonian S. eubayanus, therefore requiring a higher transport capacity to sustain sufficient intake. It could also indicate the presence of other organisms competing for this essential trace element in its ecosystem.
The S. eubayanus wild stock whose genome sequence most closely corresponds to the S. eubayanus subgenome of S. pastorianus originates from the Tibetan plateau of the Himalayas (35). However, the first S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrid, from which current lager yeasts evolved by centuries of domestication, likely originates from a region between Bavaria and Bohemia in Central Europe. So far, European S. eubayanus isolates have not been reported. This may indicate that the original hybridization event occurred elsewhere or that the ancestral European lineage became extinct. The recent detection, in a metagenomics analysis of samples from the Italian Alps, of internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) sequences corresponding to S. eubayanus could indicate that a wild European lineage exists after all (49).
Functional characterization by heterologous complementation of an S. cerevisiae mutant strain established that the SeAgt1 transporters from the Himalayan S. eubayanus strains CDFM21L.1 and ABFM5L supported uptake of maltose and maltotriose. After it was shown that these strains also encoded a functional maltase gene, their inability to grow on maltose and maltotriose was attributed to an inability to transcriptionally upregulate maltose metabolism genes likely caused by regulator loss of function. In S. cerevisiae and, to some extent, in S. eubayanus strains of the Patagonian B subclade such as CBS 12357T (13, 24, 50), MAL loci exhibit a specific organization in which a transporter (MALT) and a hydrolase (MALS) gene are expressed from the same bidirectional promoter and are located adjacent to a regulator gene (MALR) (19). In contrast, of the seven genomic regions harboring MAL genes in the two Asian S. eubayanus strains, none showed this canonical organization (Fig. 2), and the subtelomeric regions carrying SeAGT1 did not harbor sequences similar to hydrolase or regulator genes. Subtelomeric regions harboring the other MAL genes indicated intensive reorganization as a result of recombination. In particular, subtelomeric regions on ChrII, ChrV, and ChrXII provide clear indications for recombination events that scattered genes from ancestral MAL1 and MAL2 loci over several chromosomes. A similar interpretation could explain the reorganization MAL3 on ChrXIII (Fig. 2). Similar events may have contributed to loss of function of the MAL regulators (MalR), as exemplified by the occurrence of a nonsynonymous mutation in SeMALR1 resulting in loss of function. These rearrangements did not, however, inactivate the cis-regulatory sequences of the MAL genes since complementation with a functional ScMAL13 allele caused induction of most SeMAL genes (Fig. 6 and 7B) and, thereby, the heterotic maltotriose-positive phenotype of the hybrid strain HTSH020. Together with the high copy number of SeAGT1, this heterotic complementation may have been the main driver for colonization of low-temperature brewing processes by the early hybrid ancestors of current S. pastorianus strains.
Recent work on adaptation to brewing environments of laboratory S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrids showed loss of maltotriose utilization during serial transfer in wort (34). A similar loss of maltotriose utilization is frequently encountered in S. cerevisiae ale strains (52), as well as in some Saaz-type S. pastorianus strains (53). This is thus in contrast with retention of a maltotriose assimilation phenotype by Frohberg-type S. pastorianus strains. This may have been facilitated by the occurrence of multiple copies of the SeAGT1 gene in the S. eubayanus ancestor, which could act as a sequence buffer to counteracting adverse effects of gene copy loss. The recent release of the first long-read sequencing assembly of S. pastorianus enabled a precise chromosomal mapping of the maltose metabolism genes (54) and showed that the Frohberg-type S. pastorianus strain CBS 1483 harbored one copy of SeAGT1 on the S. eubayanus ChrXV section (as in CDFM21L.1) of the chimeric chromosome formed from S. eubayanus ChrXV (SeChrXV) and SeChrVIII (54).
Differential retention and loss of maltotriose consumption in S. pastorianus lineages may reflect different brewing process conditions during domestication. In modern brewing processes based on high-gravity wort, cell division is largely constrained to the glucose and maltose phases, which occur before depletion of nitrogen sources (55). It may be envisaged that, in early lager brewing processes, nonstandardized mashing processes generated wort with a higher maltotriose content, which would have allowed for continued yeast growth during the maltotriose consumption phase. During serial transfer on sugar mixtures, the selective advantage of consuming a specific sugar from a mixture correlates with the number of generations on that sugar during each cycle (56, 57). Such conditions would therefore have conferred a significant selective advantage to a maltotriose-assimilating S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrid, especially if, similar to current ale yeasts, the S. cerevisiae parent was unable to ferment maltotriose.
The heterotic phenotype that was reconstructed in the interspecies S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrid HTSH020 resulted from combination of dominant and recessive genetic variations from both parental genomes. S. eubayanus contributed the SeAGT1 gene and its functional cis-regulatory sequences but also harbored recessive mutations in MALR genes that allowed full expression of the heterotic phenotype. These mutations were complemented with a set of S. cerevisiae genes including a functional MALR and an absence of the ScAGT1 gene to match the mutations found in S. pastorianus (2). Although some S. pastorianus strains harbor an additional maltotriose transporter encoded by SpMTT1 (28), this gene was recently proposed to have emerged after the original hybridization event as a result of repeated recombination between MALT genes from both subgenomes (32). It is worthwhile mentioning that this hypothesis would also stand if the parental S. cerevisiae was carrying a functional AGT1 gene, as do about 60% of S. cerevisiae (ale) strains (52). The gene could have been mutagenized and lost its function through domestication (34).
Maltotriose fermentation is likely not the only heterotic phenotype of S. pastorianus strains. Flocculation and formation of complex aroma profiles (26, 58) are phenotypes that are not fully understood and difficult to reproduce and also might result from heterosis (34).
Laboratory-made S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrids hold great potential for brewing process intensification and for increasing product diversity. In addition to increasing our understanding of the evolutionary history of lager yeast genomes, this study has implications for the design of new hybrids. Hitherto, laboratory crosses of S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus strains were designed based on a combination of dominant traits of the parental strains. Our results show that recessive traits can be just as important as contributors to the genetic diversity of such hybrids.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and maintenance.
All strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Stock cultures of S. eubayanus and S. cerevisiae strains were grown in YPD medium (10 g liter−1 yeast extract, 20 g liter−1 peptone, and 20 g liter−1 glucose) until late exponential phase, complemented with sterile glycerol to a final concentration of 30% (vol/vol) and stored at –80°C as 1-ml aliquots until further use.
TABLE 1.
Name | Species | Relevant genotypea | Source or reference |
---|---|---|---|
CDFM21L.1 | S. eubayanus | Wild type, Mal− Mtt− | 35 |
ABFM5L.1 | S. eubayanus | Wild type, Mal− Mtt− | 35 |
CBS 12357 | S. eubayanus | Wild type, Mal+ Mtt− | 1; Westerdijk Institutec |
CBS 1483 | S. pastorianus | Wild type, Mal+ Mtt+ | Westerdijk Institute |
CEN.PK113-7D | S. cerevisiae | MATa MAL1x MAL2x MAL3x MAL4x MAL2-8C SUC2 LEU2 URA3 | 84 |
IMZ616 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mp2/3hΔ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ pUDC156 (Spcas9 URA3 ARS4 CEN6) | 41 |
IMX1365 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ pUDC156 (URA3 cas9) sga1Δ::ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t ScTEF1p-ScAGT1-ScCYC1t | 13 |
IMX1702 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ pUDC156 (URA3 cas9) sga1Δ::ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t ScTEF1p-SeMALT1-ScCYC1t | This study |
IMX1704 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ pUDC156 (URA3 cas9) sga1Δ::ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t ScTEF1p-SeMALT2-ScCYC1t | This study |
IMX1706 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ pUDC156 (URA3 cas9) sga1Δ::ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t ScTEF1p-SeMALT3-ScCYC1t | This study |
IMX 1708 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ pUDC156 (URA3 cas9) sga1Δ::ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t ScTEF1p-SeAGT1-ScCYC1t | This study |
IMX1313 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ sga1Δ::ScTEF1p-ScMAL31-ScCYC1t pUDC156 (URA3 cas9) | This study |
IMX1313Δ | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ sga1Δ::ScTEF1p-ScMAL31-ScCYC1t | This study |
IMZ752 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ sga1Δ::ScTEF1p-ScMAL31-ScCYC1t pUDE843 (ori [ColE1] bla 2μ ScTDH3p-SeMALS1-ScADH1t URA3) | This study |
IMZ753 | S. cerevisiae | MATa ura3-52 LEU2 MAL2-8C malΔ mph2/3Δ suc2Δ ima1Δ ima2Δ ima3Δ ima4Δ ima5Δ sga1Δ::ScTEF1p-ScMAL31-ScCYC1t pUDE844 (ori [ColE1] bla 2μ ScTDH3p-SeMALS2-ScADH1t URA3) | This study |
IMK820b | S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Semalt1Δ/Semalt1Δ | This study |
IMK823b | S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Seagt1Δ/Seagt1Δ (X3) | This study |
IMX1939b | S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Semalt1Δ/Semalt1Δ Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13/Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13 | This study |
IMX1940b | S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Seagt1Δ/Seagt1Δ Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13/Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13 | This study |
IMX1762b | S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Sesga1Δ::ScMAL12/Sesga1Δ::ScMAL12 | This study |
IMX1765b | S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13/Sesga1Δ::ScMAL13 | This study |
CBC-1 | S. cerevisiae | MATa/MATα Mal+ Mtt− | Lallemand |
HTSH020 | S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus | MATa/MATα Mal+ Mtt+ | This study |
The abbreviation malΔ indicates mal11-mal12::loxP mal21-mal22::loxP mal31-32::loxP. Mal and Mtt denote the maltose and maltotriose phenotype, respectively.
Direct derivatives of the wild-type S. eubayanus strain CDFM21L.1.
cWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (www.westerdijkinstitute.nl/).
Media and cultivation.
S. eubayanus batch cultures were grown on synthetic medium (SM) containing 3.0 g liter−1 KH2PO4, 5.0 g liter−1 (NH4)2SO4, 0.5 g liter−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 1 ml liter−1 trace element solution, and 1 ml liter−1 vitamin solution (59). The pH was set to 6.0 with 2 M KOH prior to autoclaving at 120°C for 20 min. Vitamin solutions were sterilized by filtration and added to the sterile medium. Concentrated sugar solutions were autoclaved at 110°C for 20 min or filter sterilized and added to the sterile flasks to give a final concentration of 20 g liter−1 glucose (SMG), maltose (SMM), or maltotriose (SMMt). With the exception of IMZ752 and IMZ753, S. cerevisiae batch cultures were grown on SM supplemented with 150 mg liter−1 uracil (60) to compensate for loss of plasmid pUDC156 (Table 2) that carried the Spcas9 endonuclease gene and supplemented with 20 g liter−1 glucose (SMuG), maltose (SMuM), or maltotriose (SMuMt). All batch cultures were grown in 250-ml shake flasks with a working volume of 50 ml. The cultures were inoculated at an initial OD660 of 0.1 and incubated under an air atmosphere and shaken at 200 rpm and at 20°C in a New Brunswick Innova 44 incubator (Eppendorf Nederland B.V., Nijmegen, The Netherlands).
TABLE 2.
Plasmid | Relevant genotype | Source or reference |
---|---|---|
p426-TEF-amdS | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM TEF1p-CYC1t | 62 |
pUD444 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM ScTEF1p-ScMAL31-ScCYC1t | This study |
pUD794 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM ScTEF1p-SeMALT1-ScCYC1t | This study |
pUD795 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM ScTEF1p-SeMALT2-ScCYC1t | This study |
pUD796 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM ScTEF1p-SeMALT3-ScCYC1t | This study |
pUD797 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM ScTEF1p-SeAGT1-ScCYC1t | This study |
pUDE044 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t URA3 | 63 |
pUDE843 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ ScTDH3p-SeMALS1-ScADH1t URA3 | This study |
pUDE844 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ ScTDH3p-SeMALS2-ScADH1t URA3 | This study |
pUDE780 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ ScPGK1p-ScMAL13-ScTEF2t URA3 | This study |
pUDP002 | ori (ColE1) bla panARSopt Hyg ScTDH3p-BsaI-BsaI-ScCYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9D147Y P411T-ScPHO5t | 66 |
pUDP004 | ori (ColE1) bla panARSopt amdSYM ScTDH3p-BsaI-BsaI-ScCYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9D147Y P411T-ScPHO5t | 44 |
pUDP052 | ori (ColE1) bla panARSopt amdSYM ScTDH3p-gRNASGA1-ScCYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9D147Y P411T-ScPHO5t | 13 |
pUDP091 | ori (ColE1) bla panARSopt amdSYM ScTDH3p-gRNASeMALT1-ScCYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9D147Y P411T-ScPHO5t | This study |
pUDP090 | ori (ColE1) bla panARSopt amdSYM ScTDH3p-gRNASeAGT1-ScCYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9D147Y P411T-ScPHO5t | This study |
pUDR119 | ori (ColE1) bla 2μ amdSYM SNR52p-gRNAScSGA1-SUP4t | 68 |
pYTK074 | ori (ColE1) cat URA3 | 64 |
pYTK082 | cat 2μ | 64 |
pYTK083 | ori (ColE1) bla | 64 |
pUD631 | ori (ColE1) bla gRNASeMALT1 | 13 |
pUD634 | ori (ColE1) bla gRNASeAGT1 | This study |
pUDC156 | ori (ColE1) bla ARS4 CEN6 URA3 Spcas9 | 41 |
S. eubayanus strains transformed with plasmid pUDP052 carrying a guide RNA targeting SeSGA1 [(gRNASeSGA1)], pUDP091 (gRNASeMALT1), and pUDP090 (gRNASeAGT1) were selected on modified SMG medium in which (NH4)2SO4 was replaced by 6.6 g liter−1 K2SO4 and 10 mM acetamide (SMAceG) (61). SM-based solid medium contained 2% Bacto agar (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). S. cerevisiae strains expressing either SeMALT, SeMALS, or ScMALR were selected on SMAceG. For plasmid propagation, Escherichia coli XL1 Blue-derived strains (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) medium (10 g liter−1 tryptone, 5 g liter−1 yeast extract, 5 g liter−1 NaCl) supplied with 100 mg liter−1 ampicillin. Synthetic wort medium (SWM) for growth studies contained 14.4 g liter−1 glucose, 2.3 g liter−1 fructose, 85.9 g liter−1 maltose, 26.8 g liter−1 maltotriose, 5 g liter−1 (NH4)2SO4, 3 g liter−1 KH2PO4, 0.5 g liter−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 1 ml liter−1 trace element solution, and 1 ml liter−1 vitamin solution, supplemented with the anaerobic growth factors ergosterol and Tween 80 (0.01 g liter−1 and 0.42 g liter−1 respectively), as previously described (59).
Industrial wort (containing 14.4 g liter−1 glucose, 85.9 g liter−1 maltose, 26.8 g liter−1 maltotriose, 2.3 g liter−1 fructose, and 269 mg liter−1 free amino nitrogen [FAN]) was provided by Heineken Supply Chain B.V. (Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands). The wort was supplemented with 1.5 mg liter−1 of Zn2+ by addition of ZnSO4·7H2O, autoclaved for 30 min at 121°C, filtered using Nalgene 0.2-μm-pore size surfactant-free cellulose acetate (SFCA) bottle-top filters (Thermo Scientific), and diluted with sterile demineralized water. Sporulation medium consisted of 2% (wt/vol) potassium acetate (KAc) in MilliQ water set to pH 7.0 with KOH, autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min.
Microaerobic growth experiments.
Microaerobic cultures were grown in 250-ml airlock-capped Neubor infusion bottles (38-mm neck; Dijkstra, Lelystad, The Netherlands) containing 200 ml of 3-fold-diluted industrial wort supplemented with 0.4 ml liter−1 pluronic antifoam (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Bottle caps were equipped with a 0.5- by 16-mm Microlance needle (BD Biosciences) and sealed with cotton to prevent pressure buildup. Sampling was performed aseptically with 3.5-ml syringes using an 0.8- by 50-mm Microlance needle (BD Biosciences). Microaerobic cultures were inoculated at an OD660 of 0.1 from stationary-phase precultures in 50 ml of Bio-One Cellstar Cellreactor tubes (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 30 ml of the same medium and grown for 4 days at 12°C. Bottles were incubated at 12°C and shaken at 200 rpm in a New Brunswick Innova 43/43R shaker (Eppendorf Nederland B.V.). At regular intervals, 3.5-ml samples were collected in deep 24-well plates (EnzyScreen BV, Heemstede, The Netherlands) using a LiHa liquid handler (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) to measure the OD660 and external metabolites. Thirty microliters of each sample was diluted 5-fold in demineralized water in a 96-well plate, and the OD660 was measured with a Magellan Infinite 200 Pro spectrophotometer (Tecan). From the remaining sample, 150 μl was vacuum filter sterilized using 0.2-μm-pore-size multiscreen filter plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) measurements.
Analytical methods.
Optical densities of yeast cultures were measured with a Libra S11 spectrophotometer (Biochrom, Cambridge, United Kingdom) at a wavelength of 660 nm. Biomass dry weight was measured by filtering 10-ml culture samples over preweighed nitrocellulose filters with a pore size of 0.45 μm. Filters were washed with 10 ml of water, dried in a microwave oven (20 min at 350 W), and reweighed. Sugars were measured using an Agilent Infinity 1260 series high-pressure liquid chromatograph (Agilent Technologies) using a Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-87H column at 65°C with 5 mM sulfuric acid at a flow rate of 0.8 ml min−1. Compounds were measured using a refractive index detector (RID) at 35°C. Samples were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min to collect supernatant or filter sterilized with a 0.2-μm-pore-size filter before analysis.
Plasmid construction.
Plasmids used and constructed in this study are listed in Table 2, and oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in Table 3. Coding regions of SeMALT1, SeMALT2, SeMALT3, and SeAGT1 were amplified from CDFM21L.1 genomic DNA with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), according to the supplier’s instructions, with the primers pairs 12355/12356, 12357/12358, 12359/12360, and 12361/12362, respectively. The coding sequence of ScMAL31 was amplified from CEN.PK113-7D genomic DNA with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), according to the supplier’s instructions, with the primer pair 9942/9943. Each primer carried a 40-bp extension complementary to the plasmid backbone of p426-TEF-amdS (62), which was PCR amplified using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and the primer pair 7812/5921. Each transporter fragment was assembled with the p426-TEF-amdS backbone fragment using NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), resulting in plasmids pUD444 (ScMAL31), pUD794 (SeMALT1), pUD795 (SeMALT2), pUD796 (SeMALT3), and pUD797 (SeAGT1). All plasmids were verified for correct assembly by Sanger sequencing (Baseclear, Leiden, The Netherlands).
TABLE 3.
Primer | Sequence (5′–3′) | Purpose |
---|---|---|
12355 | GCTCATTAGAAAGAAAGCATAGCAATCTAATCTAAGTTTTGAGACCATCAGTTAACAATG | Amplification of SeMALT1 |
12356 | GGAGGGCGTGAATGTAAGCGTGACATAACTAATTACATGATTATTGATTCGCGACTGACGC | Amplification of SeMALT1 |
12357 | GCTCATTAGAAAGAAAGCATAGCAATCTAATCTAAGTTTTGCTATTAGGCAACTATGAAGGG | Amplification of SeMALT2 |
12358 | GGAGGGCGTGAATGTAAGCGTGACATAACTAATTACATGACACTAAGAGTCATCAAATCATGAG | Amplification of SeMALT2 |
12359 | GCTCATTAGAAAGAAAGCATAGCAATCTAATCTAAGTTTTCAAATGAGATCGAGAACGGC | Amplification of SeMALT3 |
12360 | GGAGGGCGTGAATGTAAGCGTGACATAACTAATTACATGAGCCATAATTGTTTATTGAATAAGAGTC | Amplification of SeMALT3 |
12361 | GCTCATTAGAAAGAAAGCATAGCAATCTAATCTAAGTTTTCGTCCTCTGCAAGAGTGTAT | Amplification of SeAGT1 |
12362 | GGAGGGCGTGAATGTAAGCGTGACATAACTAATTACATGACCACTTAAATATGCTCACGG | Amplification of SeAGT1 |
14451 | AGTTTCGACGGATTCTAGAACTAGTCATAAATGACTATTTCTTTTGCGCATCCAG | Amplification of SeMAL12_chr2 |
14452 | AGTTTCGACGGATTCTAGAACTAGTCATAAATGACTATTTCTTCTGAACACCCGG | Amplification of SeMAL12_chr12 |
14453 | GCCAACCCTCGAGGTCGACGGTATCGATAATTACTTGGCATAGTACAATCTACCTTCC | Amplification of SeMAL12 |
9942 | GCTCATTAGAAAGAAAGCATAGCAATCTAATCTAAGTTTTCGGCTGTGTACATTTCATCCTGAGTGAGCGCATATTGCATAAG | Amplification of ScMAL31 |
9943 | GGAGGGCGTGAATGTAAGCGTGACATAACTAATTACATGACGCCGTATCTACCTACTGGCTAAAAAAATC | Amplification of ScMAL31 |
5921 | AAAACTTAGATTAGATTGCTATGCTTTCTTTCTAATGAGC | Amplification of p426-TEF-amdS backbone |
7812 | TCATGTAATTAGTTATGTCACGCTTACATTC | Amplification of p426-TEF-amdS backbone |
14449 | TTATCGATACCGTCGACCTC | Amplification of pUDE044 backbone |
14450 | TTATGACTAGTTCTAGAATCCGTCG | Amplification of pUDE044 backbone |
9421 | AAGCATCGTCTCATCGGTCTCAAACGTATTTTAGATTCCTGACTTCAACTC | Amplification of Sc-pPKG1 |
9422 | TTATGCCGTCTCAGGTCTCACATATGTTTTATATTTGTTGTAAAAAGTAGATAATTAC | Amplification of Sc-pPKG1 |
10884 | AAGCATCGTCTCATCGGTCTCAATCCGAGTAATAATTATTGCTTCCATATAATATTTTTATATAC | Amplification of Sc-TEF2t |
10885 | TTATGCCGTCTCAGGTCTCACAGCAGGAAACGTAAATTACAAGGTATATAC | Amplification of Sc-TEF2t |
12915 | TGAGCCACCCGGTCTCATATGACTTTAACTAAGCAAACATGCG | Amplification of ScMAL13 |
12916 | GGTAGTCGGGGGTCTCAGGATTCAAGGGTCTATGTCTTCATTATCC | Amplification of ScMAL13 |
9036 | TTTACAATATAGTGATAATCGTGGACTAGAGCAAGATTTCAAATAAGTAACAGCAGCAAACATAGCTTCAAAATGTTTCTACTCCTTTTTTAC | Integration in ScSGA1 |
9039 | CACCTTTCGAGAGGACGATGCCCGTGTCTAAATGATTCGACCAGCCTAAGAATGTTCAACGCCGCAAATTAAAGCCTTCG | Integration in ScSGA1 with maltase |
11018 | TGTAAATATCTAGGAAATACACTTGTGTATACTTCTCGCTTTTCTTTTATTTTTTTTTGTGCCGCAAATTAAAGCCTTCG | Integration in ScSGA1 without maltase |
11320 | ATGAAAAATATACTTTCGCTGGTAGGAAGAAAGGAAAATACCCCAGAAGATGTGACGGCGCGTCCGCAAGTTGATAACATTATTGACCGGTTCTCAAGCGCGAGTCAACAGGCGTTATGA | Repair fragment AS2.4948 ΔAGT1 (+) |
11321 | TCATAACGCCTGTTGACTCGCGCTTGAGAACCGGTCAATAATGTTATCAACTTGCGGACGCGCCGTCACATCTTCTGGGGTATTTTCCTTTCTTCCTACCAGCGAAAGTATATTTTTCAT | Repair fragment AS2.4948 ΔAGT1 (−) |
12442 | ATGAAAGGTCTATCTTCAATATTGAATAGAAAGAGAAACGAAAGTGATTCGATTTCCAGTAGTGGATCCGTTTCTCATAAAAACAGACTCTGGTGATATCACACATGAAGACCTAAAGTA | Repair fragment AS2.4948 ΔMALT1 (+) |
12443 | TACTTTAGGTCTTCATGTGTGATATCACCAGAGTCTGTTTTTATGAGAAACGGATCCACTACTGGAAATCGAATCACTTTCGTTTCTCTTTCTATTCAATATTGAAGATAGACCTTTCAT | Repair fragment AS2.4948 ΔMALT1 (−) |
11671 | AGGTTCCTGGGCAGTGAAGC | Diagnostic out-outa SeumalT1Δ |
11672 | AGGTCCAAGTCCTCTGTAAG | Diagnostic out-out SeumalT1Δ |
12273 | CATGTCGCACAGATTAGAGG | Diagnostic PCR Δagt1 |
12274 | TCGACCAAGAAGGTACTGAG | Diagnostic PCR Δagt1 |
12917 | ATGGTGAAGTTATATAACAAATTGCTCGGCACACTCGCCGTGGGCGTCGGATCTGTCTGGAACGTATTTTAGATTCCTGA | Integration on PGK1p-ScMAL13-TEF2t in SeSGA1 |
12918 | TTAAAAGGTGTTTAGAATTTCTTGTCTTATTTGATGGGCGTCCCAAAATGAGGTGTAGGAAGGAAACGTAAATTACAAGG | Integration on PGK1p-ScMAL13-TEF2t in SeSGA1 |
12319 | ATGGTGAAGTTATATAACAAATTGCTCGGCACACTCGCCGTGGGCGTCGGATCTGTCTGGGCGTGTGGAAGAACGATTAC | Integration on TDHp-ScMAL12-ADH1t in SeSGA1 |
12320 | TTAAAAGGTGTTTAGAATTTCTTGTCTTATTTGATGGGCGTCCCAAAATGAGGTGTAGGAAAGCTGGAGCTCAGTTTATC | Integration on TDHp-ScMAL12-ADH1t in SeSGA1 |
12635 | CACGAACCATGTCCGTGTAG | Diagnostic out-out SeAGT1 |
12636 | GTTGGACGTTCCGGCATAGC | Diagnostic out-out SeAGT1 |
4224 | TTGATGTAAATATCTAGGAAATACACTTG | Diagnostic out-out ScAGT1 |
4226 | ACTCGTACAAGGTGCTTTTAACTTG | Diagnostic out-out ScAGT1 |
8570 | GCGCTTTACATTCAGATCCCGAG | Diagnostic S. cerevisiae F |
8571 | TAAGTTGGTTGTCAGCAAGATTG | Diagnostic S. cerevisiae R |
8572 | GTCCCTGTACCAATTTAATATTGCGC | Diagnostic S. eubayanus F |
8573 | TTTCACATCTCTTAGTCTTTTCCAGACG | Diagnostic S. eubayanus F |
3289 | CATACGTTGAAACTACGGCAAAGG | Diagnostic out-out gRNA |
7236 | CGGTTAGAGCGGATGTGGGG | Diagnostic out-out gRNA |
901 | CTGCTGTAACCCGTACATGC | Diagnostic out-out gRNA |
15866 | GGCTTGGAATATTTTGTGCG | Diagnostic out-in MALR02/07/16 |
15867 | CATTGTGATGAGGGTCCTAG | Diagnostic out-in MALR02/07 |
15868 | CTCACCATCTTCGTTTAACATC | Diagnostic out-in MALR16 |
“out-out” refers to the position of the primers located outside the open reading frame targeted by the gRNA.
SeMALS1 and SeMALS2 were amplified from CDFM21L.1 genomic DNA with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), with the primers pairs 14451/14453 and 14452/14453, respectively. Each primer pair carried a 30-bp extension complimentary to the plasmid backbone of pUDE044 (63), which was PCR amplified using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) and the primer pair 14449/14450. Resulting amplicons were assembled using NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly (New England Biolabs), resulting in plasmids pUDE843 (SeMALS1) and pUDE844 (SeMALS2) that were verified by Sanger sequencing (Baseclear).
S. cerevisiae ScMAL13, the ScPGK1 promoter (ScPGK1p), and the ScTEF2 terminator (ScTEF2t) were amplified from CEN.PK113-7D genomic DNA with Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), with the primer pairs 12915/12916, 9421/9422, and 10884/10885, respectively. Fragments were gel purified and used with pYTK074, pYTK082, and pYTK083 in Golden Gate assembly according to the yeast toolkit protocol (64), resulting in pUDE780, which was verified by Sanger sequencing (Baseclear).
Guide RNA (gRNA) sequences for deletion of SeMALT1 and SeAGT1 in CDFM21L.1 were designed as described previously (44). The DNA sequences encoding these gRNAs were synthesized at GeneArt (Thermo Scientific) and were delivered in pUD631 and pUD634, respectively. The gRNA spacer sequences (SeMALT1, 5′-CCCCGATATTCTTTACACTA-3′; SeAGT1, 5′- AGCTTTGCGAAAATATCCAA-3′) and the structural gRNA sequence were flanked at their 5′ ends by a hammerhead ribozyme (HH) and at their 3′ ends by a hepatitis delta virus ribozyme (HDV) (65). The HH-gRNA-HDV fragment was flanked on both ends with a BsaI site for further cloning (44, 66). Plasmids pUDP091 (gRNASeMALT1) and pUDP090 (gRNASeAGT1) were constructed by Golden Gate cloning by digesting pUDP004 and the gRNA-carrying plasmid (pUD631 and pUD634, respectively) using BsaI and ligating with T4 ligase (67). Correct assembly was verified by restriction analysis with PdmI (Thermo Scientific) and Sanger sequencing (Baseclear).
Strain construction.
S. cerevisiae IMZ616, which cannot grow on α-glucosides (41), was used as a host to test functionality of individual S. eubayanus (putative) maltose transporter genes (13). S. cerevisiae IMX1702 was constructed by integrating ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t and ScTEF1p-SeMALT1-ScCYC1t at the ScSGA1 locus of strain IMZ616. A fragment containing the ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t transcriptional unit was PCR amplified using Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) from pUDE044 with the primer pair 9596/9355, which included a 5′ extension homologous to the upstream region of the ScSGA1 locus and an extension homologous to the cotransformed transporter fragment, respectively. The DNA fragment carrying the S. eubayanus SeMALT1 maltose symporter (ScTEF1p-SeMALT1-ScCYC1t) was PCR amplified from pUD794 using the primer pair 9036/9039, which included a 5′ extension homologous to the cotransformed transporter fragment and an extension homologous to the downstream region of the ScSGA1 locus, respectively. To facilitate integration in strain IMZ616, the two PCR fragments were cotransformed with plasmid pUDR119 (amdS), which expressed a gRNA targeting ScSGA1 (spacer sequence: 5′-ATTGACCACTGGAATTCTTC-3′) (68). The plasmid and repair fragments were transformed using the LiAc yeast transformation protocol (69), and transformed cells were plated on SMAceG. Correct integration was verified by diagnostic PCR with the primers pair 4226/4224. Strains S. cerevisiae IMX1704, IMX1706, and IMX1708 were constructed following the same principle, but instead of using pUD794 to generate the transporter fragment, pUD795, pUD796, and pUD797 were used to PCR amplify ScTEF1p-SeMALT2-ScCYC1t, ScTEF1p-SeMALT3-ScCYC1t, and ScTEF1p-SeAGT1-ScCYC1t respectively. IMX1313 was constructed in a similar way using only ScTEF1p-ScMAL31-ScCYC1t amplified with the primer pair 9036/11018 which contain 5′ and 3′ extensions homologous to the upstream and downstream regions of the ScSGA1 locus. Correct integration was verified by diagnostic PCR with the primer pair 4226/4224 (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). All PCR-amplified genes were Sanger sequenced (BaseClear). IMX1313 was grown on YPD medium to lose pUDR119 (URA3) and pUDC156 (amdS). An isolate unable to grown on SMG without uracil and with acetamide was selected and named IMX1313Δ. This strain was able to grow on SMG supplemented with 150 mg liter−1 uracil.
To assess functionality of CDFM21L.1 SeMALS1, IMX1313Δ was transformed with 100 ng of pUDE843 (ScTDH3p-SeMALS1-ScADH1t) by electroporation (44), resulting in strain IMZ752. Transformants were selected on SMG plates after 5 days of incubation at 20°C and validated by PCR (DreamTaq polymerase; Thermo Scientific) using the primer pair 14454/14455 (Fig. S3). Similarly, functionality of the SeMALS2 maltase gene of CDFM21L.1 was assessed by transforming IMX1313Δ with pUDE844 (ScTDH3p-SeMALS2-ScADH1t), resulting in strain IMZ753.
S. eubayanus IMK820 (SemalT1Δ) was constructed by transforming CDFM21L.1 with 200 ng of pUDP091 and 1 μg of a 120-bp repair fragment obtained by mixing an equimolar amount of primers 12442/12443, as previously described (44). As a control, the same transformation was performed without including the repair DNA fragment. Transformants were selected on SMAceG plates. S. eubayanus IMK823 (Seagt1Δ) was constructed similarly, using pUDP090 and the primer pair 11320/11321. Deletion of SemalT1 was verified by PCR with the primer pair 11671/11672 and Sanger sequencing. The Seagt1 deletion was verified by PCR using the primer pair 12273/12274 and by Illumina whole-genome sequencing and read alignment to the reference genome of CDFM21L.1.
Strains IMX1765, IMX1939, and IMX1940 were constructed by inserting ScPGK1p-ScMAL13-ScTEF2t at the SeSGA1 locus of CDFM21L.1, IMK820, and IMK823, respectively. A repair fragment containing ScPGK1p-ScMAL13-ScTEF2t was amplified from pUDE780 with the primer pair 12917/12918. Strains CDFM21L.1, IMK820, and IMK823 were transformed by electroporation by addition of 350 ng of repair fragment and 560 ng of pUDP052 (amdS) into the cells as previously described (44). Transformants were plated on SMAceG and incubated at 20°C. IMX1762 was constructed similarly using a repair fragment with ScTDH3p-ScMAL12-ScADH1t amplified from pUDE044 with the primer pair 12319/12320. Strains were verified by PCR using the primer pair 12635/12636 and Sanger sequencing.
Hybrid construction.
The S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus hybrid HTSH020 was constructed by spore-to-spore mating. The S. eubayanus strain CDFM21L.1 and the S. cerevisiae strain CBC-1 were grown in 20 ml of YPD medium at 20°C until late exponential phase. Cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 1,000 × g and washed twice in demineralized water. Cells were resuspended in 20 ml of sporulation medium and incubated for 64 h at 20°C. Presence of spores was verified by microscopy. Asci were harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,000 × g, washed with demineralized water, resuspended in 100 μl of demineralized water containing 100 U/ml of Zymolyase (MP Bio, Santa Ana, CA), and incubated for 10 min at 30°C. Spores were washed and plated on the edge of a YPD agar plate. Spores from the two strains were brought in contact with each other with an MSM System 400 micromanipulator (Singer Instruments, Watchet, United Kingdom). Zygote formation was observed after 6 to 8 h. Emerging colonies were restreaked twice on SM with 2% maltose at 12°C. Successful hybridization was verified by multiplex PCR using DreamTaq DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) by amplifying the S. cerevisiae-specific MEX67 gene with the primer pair 8570/8571 and by amplifying the S. eubayanus-specific gene SeFSY1 with the primer pair 8572/8573 (Fig. S4), as previously described (70).
Illumina sequencing.
Genomic DNA of S. eubayanus strains CDFM21L.1 and ABFM5L.1, S. cerevisiae strain CBC-1, and S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus strain HTSH020 was isolated as previously described (4). Paired-end sequencing (2 by 150 bp) was performed on a 350-bp PCR-free insert library using a HiSeq 2500 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA) by Novogene (HK) Company, Ltd. (Hong Kong, China). Genomic DNA of the strains CBC-1 and HTSH020 was sequenced in-house on a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina) with 300-bp paired-end reads using a PCR-free library preparation.
MinION long-read sequencing.
For long-read sequencing, a one-dimensional (1D) sequencing library (SQK-LSK108) was prepared for CDFM21L.1 and CBC-1 and loaded onto an FLO-MIN106 (R9.4) flow cell, connected to a MinION Mk1B unit (Oxford Nanopore Technology, Oxford, United Kingdom), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. MinKNOW software (version 1.5.12; Oxford Nanopore Technology) was used for quality control of active pores and for sequencing. Raw files generated by MinKNOW were base called using Albacore (version 1.1.0; Oxford Nanopore Technology). Reads with a minimum length of 1,000 bp were extracted in fastq format. For CDFM21L.1, 841.6 Mb of sequence with an average read length of 4.83 kb was obtained, and for CBC-1 3.04 Gb of sequence with an average read length of 7.27 kb was obtained.
De novo assembly.
De novo assembly of the Oxford Nanopore MinION data set was performed using Canu (version 1.4; setting: genomesize = 12m) (71). Assembly correctness was assessed using Pilon (72) and further corrected by polishing of sequencing/assembly errors by aligning Illumina reads with the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (73) using correction of only single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and short indels (–fix bases parameter). For HTSH020, an artificial reference genome was made by combining the assembly of CBC-1 and CDFM21L.1. The genome assemblies were annotated using the MAKER2 annotation pipeline (version 2.31.9) (74), using SNAP (version 2013-11-29) (75) and Augustus (version 3.2.3) (76) as ab initio gene predictors. S. cerevisiae S288C expressed sequence tag (EST) and protein sequences were obtained from the Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD [http://www.yeastgenome.org/]) and were aligned using BLASTX on the obtained polished sequence assembly (BLAST, version 2.2.28+) (77). Predicted translated protein sequences of the final gene model were aligned to the S. cerevisiae S288C protein Swiss-Prot database using BLASTP (http://www.uniprot.org/). Custom-made Perl scripts were used to map systematic names to the annotated gene names (Table S1). Error rates in nanopore sequencing data were estimated from the q score (Phred scaled) per read, as calculated by the base caller Albacore (version 1.1.0) (Oxford Nanopore Technology). Average q score was used to calculate the error P = 10q/10.
RNA isolation.
CDFM21L.1, IMX1765, IMX1939, and HTSH020 were grown in SMG, SMM, and SMMt until mid-exponential phase (OD660 of 12 for SMG/SMM and of OD660 15 for SMMt). Culture samples corresponding to ca. 200 mg of biomass dry weight were directly quenched in liquid nitrogen. The samples were processed, and total RNA was extracted as previously described (78). Prior to cDNA synthesis, purity, concentration, and integrity of the RNA in the samples was assessed with Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific), Qubit (Thermo Scientific), and Tapestation 220 with RNA Screen Tape (Agilent Technologies), respectively, according the manufacturers’ recommendations. cDNA libraries were prepared using a TruSeq RNA version 2 kit (Illumina). Paired-end sequencing (2 by 150 bp) was performed on a 300-bp PCR-free insert library on a HiSeq 2500 system (Illumina) at Novogene (HK) Company, Ltd. (Hong Kong, China). Duplicate biological samples were processed, generating an average sequence quantity of 23.7 million reads per sample. Reads were aligned to the CDFM21L.1 reference assembly (GEO [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/]) using a two-pass STAR (79) procedure. In the first pass, splice junctions were assembled and used to inform the second round of alignments. Introns between 15 and 4,000 bp were allowed, and soft clipping was disabled to prevent low-quality reads from being spuriously aligned. Ambiguously mapped reads were removed from the data set. Expression levels for each transcript were quantified using htseq-count (80) in union mode. For the gene of interest, the number of fragments per kilo base per million reads (FPKM) mapped was calculated by applying the fpkm method from the edgeR package (81, 82). Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq (83).
Data availability.
The sequencing data were deposited at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under BioProject accession number PRJNA528469, and the transcriptomics data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE133146.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Flip de Groot for his technical assistance in gene editing of S. eubayanus and Niels G.A. Kuijpers, Viktor M. Boer, and Jan-Maarten Geertman for their critical input.
J.-M.G.D. conceived the study and designed the experiments. N.B., A.B., L.V.D.E., A.R.G.D.V., S.M.W., and J.A.D. performed the experimental work. N.B. and M.V.D.B. performed bioinformatics analysis. N.B., A.B., F.-Y.B., J.T.P., and J.-M.G.D. supervised the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the BE-Basic R&D Program (http://www.be-basic.org/), which was granted an FES subsidy from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (EL&I). A.B. was funded by the Seventh Framework Program of the European Union in the frame of the SP3 people support for training and career development of researchers (Marie Curie), Networks for Initial Training (PITN-GA-2013 ITN-2013-606795) YeastCell (https://yeastcell.eu/)
We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01516-19.
REFERENCES
- 1.Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, Gonçalves C, Dover J, Johnston M, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP. 2011. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:14539–14544. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105430108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nakao Y, Kanamori T, Itoh T, Kodama Y, Rainieri S, Nakamura N, Shimonaga T, Hattori M, Ashikari T. 2009. Genome sequence of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Res 16:115–129. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsp003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walther A, Hesselbart A, Wendland J. 2014. Genome sequence of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, the world’s first pure culture lager yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 4:783–793. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.010090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Van den Broek M, Bolat I, Nijkamp JF, Ramos E, Luttik MAH, Koopman F, Geertman JM, De Ridder D, Pronk JT, Daran J-M. 2015. Chromosomal copy number variation in Saccharomyces pastorianus evidence for extensive genome dynamics in industrial lager brewing strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:6253–6267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01263-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Krogerus K, Magalhães F, Vidgren V, Gibson B. 2015. New lager yeast strains generated by interspecific hybridization. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 42:769–778. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1597-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hebly M, Brickwedde A, Bolat I, Driessen MR, de Hulster EA, van den Broek M, Pronk JT, Geertman J-M, Daran J-M, Daran-Lapujade P. 2015. S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus interspecific hybrid, the best of both worlds and beyond. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov005. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Krogerus K, Magalhães F, Vidgren V, Gibson B. 2017. Novel brewing yeast hybrids: creation and application. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:65–78. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-8007-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zastrow C, Hollatz C, De Araujo P, Stambuk B. 2001. Maltotriose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:34–38. doi: 10.1038/sj/jim/7000158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Alves SL, Herberts RA, Hollatz C, Trichez D, Miletti LC, De Araujo PS, Stambuk BU. 2008. Molecular analysis of maltotriose active transport and fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a determinant role for the AGT1 permease. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:1494–1501. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02570-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vidgren V, Huuskonen A, Virtanen H, Ruohonen L, Londesborough J. 2009. Improved fermentation performance of a lager yeast after repair of its AGT1 maltose and maltotriose transporter genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2333–2345. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01558-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brickwedde A, van den Broek M, Geertman J-M, Magalhães F, Kuijpers NG, Gibson B, Pronk JT, Daran J-M. 2017. Evolutionary engineering in chemostat cultures for improved maltotriose fermentation kinetics in Saccharomyces pastorianus lager brewing yeast. Front Microbiol 8:1690. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zheng X, D’Amore T, Russell I, Stewart G. 1994. Factors influencing maltotriose utilization during brewery wort fermentations. J Am Soc Brew Chem 52:41–47. doi: 10.1094/ASBCJ-52-0041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brickwedde A, Brouwers N, van den Broek M, Gallego Murillo JS, Fraiture JL, Pronk JT, Daran J-M. 2018. Structural, physiological and regulatory analysis of maltose transporter genes in Saccharomyces eubayanus CBS 12357T. Front Microbiol 9:1786. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baker EP, Hittinger CT. 2019. Evolution of a novel chimeric maltotriose transporter in Saccharomyces eubayanus from parent proteins unable to perform this function. PLoS Genet 15:e1007786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nikulin J, Krogerus K, Gibson B. 2018. Alternative Saccharomyces interspecies hybrid combinations and their potential for low-temperature wort fermentation. Yeast 35:113–127. doi: 10.1002/yea.3246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheng Q, Michels CA. 1991. MAL11 and MAL61 encode the inducible high-affinity maltose transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 173:1817–1820. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.5.1817-1820.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vidgren V, Multanen JP, Ruohonen L, Londesborough J. 2010. The temperature dependence of maltose transport in ale and lager strains of brewer’s yeast. FEMS Yeast Res 10:402–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00627.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Naumov GI, Naumova ES, Michels C. 1994. Genetic variation of the repeated MAL loci in natural populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics 136:803–812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Charron MJ, Read E, Haut SR, Michels CA. 1989. Molecular evolution of the telomere-associated MAL loci of Saccharomyces. Genetics 122:307–316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hayford A, Jespersen L. 1999. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from spontaneously fermented maize dough by profiles of assimilation, chromosome polymorphism, PCR and MAL genotyping. J Appl Microbiol 86:284–294. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00653.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bell PJ, Higgins VJ, Dawes IW, Bissinger PH. 1997. Tandemly repeated 147 bp elements cause structural and functional variation in divergent MAL promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13:1135–1144. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Barnett JA. 1976. The utilization of sugars by yeasts. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem 32:125–234. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2318(08)60337-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Salazar AN, Gorter de Vries AR, van den Broek M, Wijsman M, de la Torre Cortés P, Brickwedde A, Brouwers N, Daran J-M, Abeel T. 2017. Nanopore sequencing enables near-complete de novo assembly of Saccharomyces cerevisiae reference strain CEN. PK113-7D. FEMS Yeast Res 17:fox074. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baker E, Wang B, Bellora N, Peris D, Hulfachor AB, Koshalek JA, Adams M, Libkind D, Hittinger CT. 2015. The genome sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the domestication of lager-brewing yeasts. Mol Biol Evol 32:2818–2831. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msv168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Han EK, Cotty F, Sottas C, Jiang H, Michels CA. 1995. Characterization of AGT1 encoding a general alpha-glucoside transporter from Saccharomyces. Mol Microbiol 17:1093–1107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061093.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vidgren V, Gibson B. 2018. Trans-regulation and localization of orthologous maltose transporters in the interspecies lager yeast hybrid. FEMS Yeast Res 18:foy065. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salema-Oom M, Valadao Pinto V, Goncalves P, Spencer-Martins I. 2005. Maltotriose utilization by industrial Saccharomyces strains: characterization of a new member of the α-glucoside transporter family. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:5044–5049. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5044-5049.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dietvorst J, Londesborough J, Steensma H. 2005. Maltotriose utilization in lager yeast strains: MTT1 encodes a maltotriose transporter. Yeast 22:775–788. doi: 10.1002/yea.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cousseau F, Alves S Jr, Trichez D, Stambuk B. 2013. Characterization of maltotriose transporters from the Saccharomyces eubayanus subgenome of the hybrid Saccharomyces pastorianus lager brewing yeast strain Weihenstephan 34/70. Lett Appl Microbiol 56:21–29. doi: 10.1111/lam.12011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nguyen H-V, Legras J-L, Neuvéglise C, Gaillardin C. 2011. Deciphering the hybridisation history leading to the lager lineage based on the mosaic genomes of Saccharomyces bayanus strains NBRC1948 and CBS380T. PLoS One 6:e25821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reference deleted.
- 32.Brouwers N, Gorter de Vries AR, van den Broek M, Weening SM, Elink Schuurman TD, Kuijpers NGA, Pronk JT, Daran JG. 2019. In vivo recombination of Saccharomyces eubayanus maltose-transporter genes yields a chimeric transporter that enables maltotriose fermentation. PLoS Genet 15:e1007853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mertens S, Steensels J, Saels V, De Rouck G, Aerts G, Verstrepen KJ. 2015. A large set of newly created interspecific yeast hybrids increases aromatic diversity in lager beers. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:8202–8214. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02464-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gorter de Vries AR, Voskamp MA, van Aalst ACA, Kristensen LH, Jansen L, van den Broek M, Salazar AN, Brouwers N, Abeel T, Pronk JT, Daran JG. 2019. Laboratory evolution of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae x S. eubayanus hybrid under simulated lager-brewing conditions. Front Genet 10:242. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bing J, Han P-J, Liu W-Q, Wang Q-M, Bai F-Y. 2014. Evidence for a Far East Asian origin of lager beer yeast. Curr Biol 24:R380–R381. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Peris D, Langdon QK, Moriarty RV, Sylvester K, Bontrager M, Charron G, Leducq J-B, Landry C, Libkind D, Hittinger CT. 2016. complex ancestries of lager-brewing hybrids were shaped by standing variation in the wild yeast Saccharomyces eubayanus. PLoS Genet 12:e1006155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brown CA, Murray AW, Verstrepen KJ. 2010. Rapid expansion and functional divergence of subtelomeric gene families in yeasts. Curr Biol 20:895–903. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moller M, Habig M, Freitag M, Stukenbrock EH. 2018. Extraordinary genome instability and widespread chromosome rearrangements during vegetative growth. Genetics 210:517–529. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gordon JL, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2009. Additions, losses, and rearrangements on the evolutionary route from a reconstructed ancestor to the modern Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. PLoS Genet 5:e1000485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marques WL, Mans R, Henderson RK, Marella ER, ter Horst J, de Hulster E, Poolman B, Daran J-M, Pronk JT, Gombert AK, van Maris AJA. 2018. Combined engineering of disaccharide transport and phosphorolysis for enhanced ATP yield from sucrose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 45:121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Meurer M, Chevyreva V, Cerulus B, Knop M. 2017. The regulatable MAL32 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: characteristics and tools to facilitate its use. Yeast 34:39–49. doi: 10.1002/yea.3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Levine J, Tanouye L, Michels CA. 1992. The UAS(MAL) is a bidirectional promotor element required for the expression of both the MAL61 and MAL62 genes of the Saccharomyces MAL6 locus. Curr Genet 22:181–189. doi: 10.1007/BF00351724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gorter de Vries AR, Groot PA, Broek M, Daran J-M. 2017. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene deletions in lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Microb Cell Fact 16:222. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0835-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vidgren V, Kankainen M, Londesborough J, Ruohonen L. 2011. Identification of regulatory elements in the AGT1 promoter of ale and lager strains of brewer’s yeast. Yeast 28:579–594. doi: 10.1002/yea.1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dunn B, Sherlock G. 2008. Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res 18:1610–1623. doi: 10.1101/gr.076075.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Okuno M, Kajitani R, Ryusui R, Morimoto H, Kodama Y, Itoh T. 2016. Next-generation sequencing analysis of lager brewing yeast strains reveals the evolutionary history of interspecies hybridization. DNA Res 23:67–80. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsv037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Monerawela C, Bond U. 2017. Brewing up a storm: The genomes of lager yeasts and how they evolved. Biotechnol Adv 35:512–519. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Alsammar HF, Naseeb S, Brancia LB, Gilman RT, Wang P, Delneri D. 2019. Targeted metagenomics approach to capture the biodiversity of Saccharomyces genus in wild environments. Environ Microbiol Rep 11:206–214. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vidgren V, Ruohonen L, Londesborough J. 2005. Characterization and functional analysis of the MAL and MPH Loci for maltose utilization in some ale and lager yeast strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7846–7857. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.7846-7857.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Reference deleted.
- 52.Gallone B, Steensels J, Prahl T, Soriaga L, Saels V, Herrera-Malaver B, Merlevede A, Roncoroni M, Voordeckers K, Miraglia L, Teiling C, Steffy B, Taylor M, Schwartz A, Richardson T, White C, Baele G, Maere S, Verstrepen KJ. 2016. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166:1397–1410.e1316. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gibson BR, Storgårds E, Krogerus K, Vidgren V. 2013. Comparative physiology and fermentation performance of Saaz and Frohberg lager yeast strains and the parental species Saccharomyces eubayanus. Yeast 30:255–266. doi: 10.1002/yea.2960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Salazar AN, Gorter de Vries AR, van den Broek M, Brouwers N, de la Torre Cortès P, Kuijpers NGA, Daran J-M, Abeel T. 2019. Nanopore sequencing and comparative genome analysis confirm lager-brewing yeasts originated from a single hybridization. bioRxiv 10.1101/603480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Lei H, Zhao H, Yu Z, Zhao M. 2012. Effects of wort gravity and nitrogen level on fermentation performance of brewer’s yeast and the formation of flavor volatiles. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 166:1562–1574. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9560-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Papapetridis I, Verhoeven MD, Wiersma SJ, Goudriaan M, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. 2018. Laboratory evolution for forced glucose-xylose co-consumption enables identification of mutations that improve mixed-sugar fermentation by xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 18:foy056. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris A. 2009. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:907–914. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02268-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bolat I, Romagnoli G, Zhu F, Pronk JT, Daran JM. 2013. Functional analysis and transcriptional regulation of two orthologs of ARO10, encoding broad-substrate-specificity 2-oxo-acid decarboxylases, in the brewing yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus CBS1483. FEMS Yeast Res 13:505–517. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP. 1992. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous‐culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8:501–517. doi: 10.1002/yea.320080703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Pronk JT. 2002. Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied research. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2095–2100. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.5.2095-2100.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Solis-Escalante D, Kuijpers NG, Nadine B, Bolat I, Bosman L, Pronk JT, Daran J-M, Pascale D-L. 2013. amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 13:126–139. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Marques WL, Mans R, Marella ER, Cordeiro RL, van den Broek M, Daran J-M, Pronk JT, Gombert AK, van Maris A. 2017. Elimination of sucrose transport and hydrolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a platform strain for engineering sucrose metabolism. FEMS Yeast Res 17:fox006. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.de Kok S, Yilmaz D, Suir E, Pronk JT, Daran J-M, van Maris A. 2011. Increasing free-energy (ATP) conservation in maltose-grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae by expression of a heterologous maltose phosphorylase. Metab Eng 13:518–526. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee ME, DeLoache WC, Cervantes B, Dueber JE. 2015. A highly characterized yeast toolkit for modular, multipart assembly. ACS Synth Biol 4:975–986. doi: 10.1021/sb500366v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Gao Y, Zhao Y. 2014. Self‐processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. J Integr Plant Biol 56:343–349. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Juergens H, Varela JA, Gorter de Vries AR, Perli T, Gast VJM, Gyurchev NY, Rajkumar AS, Mans R, Pronk JT, Morrissey JP, Daran J-MG. 2018. Genome editing in Kluyveromyces and Ogataea yeasts using a broad-host-range Cas9/gRNA co-expression plasmid. FEMS Yeast Res 18:foy012. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Engler C, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S. 2008. A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One 3:e3647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.van Rossum HM, Kozak BU, Niemeijer MS, Duine HJ, Luttik MA, Boer VM, Kötter P, Daran J-M, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. 2016. Alternative reactions at the interface of glycolysis and citric acid cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 16:fow017. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fow017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. 2007. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc 2:31–34. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Pengelly RJ, Wheals AE. 2013. Rapid identification of Saccharomyces eubayanus and its hybrids. FEMS Yeast Res 13:156–161. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Li H, Durbin R. 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26:589–595. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Holt C, Yandell M. 2011. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinformatics 12:491. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Korf I. 2004. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B. 2006. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W435–W439. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Tai SL, Boer VM, Daran-Lapujade P, Walsh MC, de Winde JH, Daran J-M, Pronk JT. 2005. Two-dimensional transcriptome analysis in chemostat cultures combinatorial effects of oxygen availability and macronutrient limitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280:437–447. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410573200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Dobin A, Gingeras TR. 2016. Optimizing RNA-Seq mapping with STAR, p 245–262. In Carugo O, Eisenhaber F (ed), Data mining techniques for the life sciences. Springer Science, New York, NY. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2015. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. 2012. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res 40:4288–4297. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Okoniewski M, Smyth GK, Huber W, Robinson MD. 2013. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc 8:1765. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Entian K-D, Kötter P. 2007. 25 yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. Methods Microbiol 36:629–666. doi: 10.1016/S0580-9517(06)36025-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The sequencing data were deposited at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under BioProject accession number PRJNA528469, and the transcriptomics data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE133146.