Skip to main content
HHS Author Manuscripts logoLink to HHS Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 31.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Apr 1;177(4):585–588. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9386

Medicare Part D plans’ coverage and cost-sharing for acute rescue and preventive inhalers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chien-Wen Tseng 1, Jinoos Yazdany 2, R Adams Dudley 2, Colette DeJong 2, Dhruv S Kazi 3, Randi Chen 4, Grace A Lin 2
PMCID: PMC6822611  NIHMSID: NIHMS1056358  PMID: 28241217

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the US,1 affecting 15.7 million adults1 and causing nearly 700,000 hospitalizations and 1.7 million emergency department visits in 2012.2 Much of the burden of COPD falls heavily on Medicare, with 1 in 9 Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with COPD3 and Medicare paying 51% of all US direct health care costs for COPD.4 Inhaled medications are key to relieving symptoms and improving health outcomes. However, up to 31% of Medicare beneficiaries using COPD inhalers have reported nonadherence due to cost.5 COPD inhaler costs increased dramatically in 2008, when a ban on chlorofluorocarbon propellants phased out generic inhalers, leaving only brand-name options.6 We examined coverage and cost-sharing for COPD inhalers in Medicare Part D plans, which covered 39 million beneficiaries in 2015.

Methods:

We analyzed the June 2015 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Prescription Drug Plan Formulary, Pharmacy Network, and Pricing Information Files for all Part D plans nationwide, except special-needs plans which serve specific populations (e.g. long-term care) and may have specialized formularies. We focused on 21 inhalers in 7 treatment classes including short-acting rescue inhalers and longer-acting or preventive inhalers. For each inhaler, we averaged coverage and required out-of-pocket costs across all plans by counties and states, including Washington, D.C. For the most widely covered inhaler in each class, we projected yearly cost-sharing under a standard 2015 Part D benefit with a $320 deductible, and whether beneficiaries would reach the coverage gap where cost-sharing increases after total drug expenditures exceed a set threshold. Since COPD often causes costly hospitalizations2, we explored whether Part D plans which provide both medical and drug benefits (Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plans [MA-PD]), offered better inhaler coverage than stand-alone Part D plans (Prescription Drug Plans [PDP]).

Results:

Our national analysis included 2,652 plans (1639 MA-PD, 1013 PDP). Between 93% to 100% of plans covered at least one inhaler in each class. Mean out-of-pocket costs ranged from $30 to $105 per inhaler, depending on the inhaler selected (Table 1). The projected annual out-of-pocket cost under a standard 2015 Part D benefit ranged from $494 to $1197 for the most widely covered inhaler in each class (Figure 1). For 5 of 7 classes, using a single inhaler each month would have produced annual out-of-pocket costs ≥$900 and caused beneficiaries to reach the coverage gap even without other medications. Patients with moderate to severe COPD requiring two or three inhalers per month (acute rescue and/or multiple preventive classes) would have had projected annual out-of-pocket expenses of $1,622 to $2,811, reaching the coverage gap by August or earlier.

Table 1.

Part D plans’ coverage and cost-sharing for inhalers for COPDa

Mean
Plans cover inhaler Out-of-pocket cost per inhaler Total cost per inhalere
Class Brand-name Chemical name All plans % MA-PD plans % PDP plans % Difference (MA-PD vs. PDP) % All plans $ MA-PD plans $ PDP plans $ Difference (MA-PD vs. PDP) $ All plans $
Acute Rescue Inhalersc
SABA Proair albuterold 92 94 92 2 30 40 28 12 52
SABA Ventolin albuterol 56 73 52 21 36 45 34 11 47
SABA Xopenex levalbuterol 32 33 30 3 38 61 33 28 59
SABA Proventil albuterol 17 50 11 39 50 77 31 46 66
SAMA Atrovent ipratropiumd 94 99 93 6 73 77 73 4 265
SABA/SAMA Combivent albuterol/ipratropiumd 93 99 92 7 63 63 63 0 284
Long-Acting and/or Preventive Inhalersc
LAMA Spiriva tiotropiumd 93 98 92 6 58 46 61 −15 320
LAMA Tudorza aclidinium 65 65 65 0 49 69 46 23 286
LABA Serevent salmeterold 94 99 93 6 50 51 49 2 261
LABA Foradil formoterol 83 92 81 11 39 47 38 9 225
LABA Brovana arformoterol 25 38 22 16 105 95 110 −15 333
LABA Arcapta indacterol 61 75 59 16 84 86 83 3 206
ICS QVAR beclomethasoned 90 97 89 8 39 44 38 6 191
ICS Flovent fluticasone 85 97 83 14 37 43 36 7 147
ICS Asmanex mometasone 81 93 71 22 42 52 40 12 159
ICS Pulmicort budesonide 40 46 39 7 64 58 66 −8 188
ICS Alvesco ciclesonide 25 50 20 30 90 85 93 −8 213
LABA/ICS Dulera formoterol/mometasoned 86 89 86 3 65 72 64 8 261
LABA/ICS Breo Ellipta vilanterol/fluticasone 85 89 84 5 60 57 61 −4 298
LABA/ICS Symbicort formoterol/budesonide 84 90 83 7 45 47 44 3 244
LABA/ICS Advair salmeterol/fluticasone 82 98 79 19 48 45 49 −4 244
Multiple Inhalers (Acute Rescue Inhaler and Long-Acting/Preventive Inhaler)
Two inhalers Proair + Spiriva albuterol + tiotriopium -- -- --- --- 88 86 89 −3 372
Three inhalers Proair + Spiriva + Dulera albuterol + tiotropium + formoterol / mometasone -- -- --- --- 148 158 153 5 617
a

Averaged across all plans in a county, then across all counties and states, including Washington D.C.

b

Fewer than 1% of plans required Prior Authorizations except for arformoterol (24% of plans) and formoterol/mometasone (8% of plans).

c

SABA: short-acting beta agonists; SAMA: short-acting anticholinergic or muscarinic antagonists; LAMA: long-acting anticholinergic or muscarinic antagonists; LABA: long-acting beta agonists; ICS: inhaled corticosteroids.

d

Most widely covered inhaler in the class.

e

Total cost = (cost paid by plan) + (out-of-pocket cost paid by beneficiary)

Figure 1. Projected Annual Out-of-Pocket Cost for COPD Inhalers Under a Standard 2015 Part D Benefit (Month Enter Coverage Gap).

Figure 1.

Projected annual out-of-pocket costs to use 1 inhaler per month. Based on standard 2015 Part D plan with $320 deductible and coverage gap starting at $2960 in total drug costs. SABA: short-acting beta agonists; SAMA: short-acting anticholinergic or muscarinic antagonists; LAMA: long-acting anticholinergic or muscarinic antagonists; LABA: long-acting beta agonists; ICS: inhaled corticosteroid

n/a - projected cost of using 1 inhaler per month does not reach coverage gap threshold.

The vast majority (≥ 92%) of both MA-PD and PDP plans covered at least one inhaler per class, although MA-PD plans covered specific inhalers more frequently (Table 1); for 20 of 21 inhalers, the percentage of MA-PD plans providing coverage was 2% to 39% greater than PDP plans. However, MA-PD plans required higher out-of-pocket costs than PDP plans for 14 of 21 inhalers, with cost-sharing ranging from $2 to $46 higher per inhaler.

Discussion:

In our nationwide analysis of Medicare Part D plans, COPD inhalers were nearly universally covered but required high cost-sharing by beneficiaries. For many acute rescue and preventive inhalers, using a single inhaler each month had projected annual out-of-pocket costs ≥ $900 under a standard 2015 Part D plan even without other medications.

Our study limitations include projecting annual cost-sharing for each inhaler based on using one inhaler per month and no other prescriptions. We did not examine actual out-of-pocket costs, which reflect a beneficiary’s coverage phase when filling an inhaler prescription, which in turn is influenced by their non-COPD medication costs.

Our findings call into question whether Part D continues to adequately support beneficiaries in the face of rapidly rising drug prices. Part D plans and Medicare policy should reassess whether this high cost-sharing adversely affects inhaler adherence and health for beneficiaries with COPD.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by AHRQ R03HS016772 and the Hawaii Medical Services Association Endowed Chair in Health Services and Quality Research. Dr. Yazdany is supported by AHRQ R01 HS024412 and the Russell/Engleman Medical Research Center for Arthritis at the University of California, San Francisco. Dr. Lin is supported by AHRQ K08HS017723. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, including data analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Footnotes

Disclosures: No financial or other commercial relationships.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Han MK, Martinez CH, Au DH, Bourbeau J, Boyd CM, Branson R, et al. Meeting the challenge of COPD care delivery in the USA: a multiprovider prospective. Lancet Respir Med. 2016. June; 4(6):473–526. Epub 2016 May 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ford ES. Hospital discharges, readmissions, and ED visits for COPD or bronchiectasis among US adults: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample 2001-2012 and Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2006-2011. Chest. 2015. April; 147(4):989–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Health Indicators Warehouse. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Medicare beneficiaries (percent). http://www.healthindicators.gov/Indicators/Chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-COPD-Medicare-beneficiaries-percent_290/Profile/ClassicData Accessed October 12, 2016.
  • 4.Ford ES, Murphy LB, Khavjou O, Giles WH, Holt JB, Croft JB. Total and state-specific medical and absenteeism costs of COPD among adults aged ≥ 18 years in the United States for 2010 and projections through 2020. Chest. 2015. January;147(1):31–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Castaldi PJ, Rogers WH, Safran DG, Wilson IB. Inhaler costs and medication nonadherence among seniors with chronic pulmonary disease. Chest. 2010. September;138(3):614–20. Epub 2010 Apr 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jena AB, Ho O, Goldman DP, Karaca-Mandic P. The impact of the US Food and Drug Administration chlorofluorocarbon ban on out-of-pocket cost and use of albuterol inhalers among individuals with asthma. JAMA Intern Med. 2015. July;175(7):1171–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES