Correction to: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
10.1007/s10815-019-01563-1
The original article unfortunately contained 2 mistakes. 1) In the Result section of high responders in the main text, “Fresh and cumulative LBR did not differ significantly for IVF and ICSI patients (145/468 (31%) vs. 32/87 (36.7%) and 287/468 (61.3%) vs. 52/87 (59.8%), p value = 0.3 and 0.8, respectively))” should be “Fresh and cumulative LBR did not differ significantly for ICSI and IVF patients .........” . 2) There was a wrong transformation of percentages for fresh and cumulative LBR (from the Table to Fig. 3b). Please see below the revised Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Fresh and cumulative LBR according to the insemination method in poor (a) and suboptimal responders (b)
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s10815-019-01563-1
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.