Abstract
The production of bioactive plant compounds using microbial hosts is considered a safe, cost-competitive and scalable approach to their production. However, microbial production of some compounds like aromatic amino acid (AAA)-derived chemicals, remains an outstanding metabolic engineering challenge. Here we present the construction of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae platform strain able to produce high levels of p-coumaric acid, an AAA-derived precursor for many commercially valuable chemicals. This is achieved through engineering the AAA biosynthesis pathway, introducing a phosphoketalose-based pathway to divert glycolytic flux towards erythrose 4-phosphate formation, and optimizing carbon distribution between glycolysis and the AAA biosynthesis pathway by replacing the promoters of several important genes at key nodes between these two pathways. This results in a maximum p-coumaric acid titer of 12.5 g L−1 and a maximum yield on glucose of 154.9 mg g−1.
Subject terms: Metabolic engineering, Metabolic engineering, Synthetic biology, Applied microbiology
Microbial production of aromatic amino acid (AAA)-derived chemicals remains an outstanding metabolic engineering challenge. Here, the authors engineer baker’s yeast for high levels p-coumaric acid production by rewiring the central carbon metabolism and channeling more flux to the AAA biosynthetic pathway.
Introduction
Plant natural products, such as flavonoids and alkaloids, are widely used as food and feed additives, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals, and pharmaceutical drugs1–4. However, access to natural sources of these plant-based natural products can often be limited due to their scarce availability. Furthermore, complete chemical synthesis of these compounds has remained challenging due to their structural complexity5. To sustainably supply such functional natural products and meet both current and future expected demands, attention has been drawn toward pursuing alternative approaches for their production. Recently, an increasing number of studies have shown that it is possible to reconstitute complex plant pathways in microorganisms for specific plant natural products, such as medicinal opioids, alkaloids, and the precursor to Taxol6–8. Subsequently, the feasibility of microbial production for these valuable compounds is increasingly being realized.
The aromatic amino acid (AAA) biosynthesis pathway is one of the core metabolic pathways that lead to the production of many of these specialty compounds. AAAs act as the primary substrates for the biosynthesis of a wide range of commercially relevant natural products, such as flavonoids and alkaloids, which collectively represent a multi-billion-dollar market value. Indeed, there have been several reports on engineering the bacterium Escherichia coli for the production of aromatic compounds9–11. However, although production in E. coli has led to success in some cases, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae proves to be a more attractive host, due to its robustness and tolerance toward harsh fermentation conditions, and importantly its superior capability of expressing membrane-bound cytochrome P450 oxidases, which are key catalysts in most relevant plant-based biosynthetic pathways12,13. Significant efforts have been made toward enhancing the production of AAA-derived products in yeast. Here, the most successful strategies include overexpression of the feedback-insensitive mutant enzymes 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase and chorismate mutase, which catalyze the first committed step in the AAA biosynthesis pathway, and the branching point toward the production of tyrosine and phenylalanine, respectively14. However, the reported yields of aromatic compounds in these reports remain too low to make these metabolic-engineering strategies economically feasible for scaling up to industrial levels. In contrast, straightforward genetic modifications such as alleviating feedback inhibition in E. coli has resulted in gram-per-liter levels of AAAs and their related products. It is clear therefore that AAA-based production in yeast is currently an outstanding metabolic-engineering challenge.
The initiation of AAA biosynthesis requires two precursors: erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) derived from the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) derived from glycolysis. Considering the intrinsic functional differences between these parallel pathways, the available fluxes of these two precursors differ drastically. Metabolic flux analysis in yeast has shown that the available carbon flux toward E4P is at least one order of magnitude lower than the flux to PEP, even in a strain that is optimized for initial AAA pathway productivity12. Moreover, the enzyme in yeast that catalyzes the first committed step to condense PEP and E4P to form DAHP, DAHP synthase Aro3 and Aro4, both display much higher preferences toward the substrate PEP, with their Michaelis constants (Km) being 4–7-fold lower than that for their other substrate E4P15,16. In addition, E4P has been reported to be the primary limiting substrate for AAA biosynthesis in other microorganisms, such as E. coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Corynebacterium glutamicum17–19. Taken together, this would suggest that the key to maximizing the production of aromatic chemicals in yeast is to increase the availability of E4P.
To address the possible constraints on the entrance flux into the AAA biosynthetic pathway, the most common strategy employed by previous studies focuses on rewiring the PPP. This includes overexpression of transketolase Tkl1, which showed to have a limited impact due to kinetic constraints favoring the opposite reaction;12,20–23 deletion of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase Zwf120,22,24. The latter, however, blocks the oxidative shunt of the PPP, which is the main source of the redox cofactor NADPH25 that is required by the shikimate dehydrogenase Aro1 in the AAA biosynthesis pathway, as well as by many enzymes in downstream pathways for the formation of specialty products. In addition, some other targets including transaldolase Tal1 and ribose-5-phosphate ketol-isomerase Rki1 have also been investigated22,26. However, none of these strategies were able to efficiently divert carbon flux from glycolysis toward E4P, to provide sufficient levels for biosynthesis of aromatic chemicals.
Here we rewire the central carbon metabolism in yeast such that it efficiently provides E4P and channels more flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway (Fig. 1). In doing so, we can substantially increase the production of AAAs and their derivatives. The contribution of AAA pools toward potential downstream use is evaluated by the formation of para-coumaric acid (also called p-hydroxycinnamic acid, p-HCA), a starting material for a wide array of commercially valuable chemicals from flavors, fragrances, and pharmaceuticals, to biocosmetics, and health and nutrition products.
Results
Relieving bottlenecks in the AAA biosynthesis pathway
The production of p-HCA in yeast can be accomplished via a single heterologous enzymatic step from tyrosine (the TAL branch) or via two enzymatic steps from phenylalanine (the PAL branch) (Figs. 1 and 2a). By introducing (i) a phenylalanine ammonia lyase (AtPAL2), a cinnamic acid hydroxylase (AtC4H), and a cytochrome P450 reductase (AtATR2) from Arabidopsis thaliana, together with a cytochrome B5 (CYB5) from S. cerevisiae, or (ii) a highly specific tyrosine ammonia lyase from Flavobacterium johnsoniae (FjTAL)27, we generated the reference strains QL01 and QL13 that were able to produce p-HCA with titers of 337.6 and 12.9 mg L−1, respectively (Fig. 2b, c, Supplementary Fig. 1 for more strain information). Clearly, the PAL branch was far more efficient compared with the TAL branch, despite intracellular tyrosine concentrations usually reported as being slightly higher than those of phenylalanine during glucose-limited conditions28,29, which is similar to our slow release of glucose conditions used here. Our results could also be attributed to the low efficiency of the tyrosine ammonia lyase used here. Expressing feedback-insensitive DAHP synthase Aro4K229L in either of the two reference strains did not significantly improve p-HCA production; however, accumulation of AAA biosynthesis pathway intermediates such as shikimate, and by-products such as tryptophol, phenylethanol, and p-hydroxyphenylethanol, was significantly increased in strain QL02 compared with QL01 (Supplementary Fig. 2), consistent with the previous report on the alleviation of the feedback allosteric loop on DAHP synthase14. In line with this, overexpression of feedback-insensitive chorismate mutase Aro7G141S alone did not have a statistically significant (p > 0.05) effect on p-HCA production (Supplementary Fig. 3). However, by creating a strain with both Aro4K229L and Aro7G141S modifications, p-HCA production increased by about 1.7-fold with the PAL branch (strain QL04) and 2.7-fold with the TAL branch (strain QL15) (Fig. 2b, c). This indicates the importance of relieving allosteric regulation of DAHP synthase and chorismite mutase to increase carbon flux toward phenylalanine and tyrosine, a finding that was further supported by reducing tryptophol accumulation in strain QL04 (Supplementary Fig. 2). On the other hand, further increase seen in levels of the pathway intermediate shikimate indicated that additional bottlenecks still existed after alleviation of these feedback allosteric loops.
As the heterologous shikimate kinase AroL from E. coli has previously been shown to be beneficial for production of AAA-derived chemicals30, introduction of EcaroL was tested (resulting in strains QL05 and QL16); however, this only showed modest effects on p-HCA production. Next, we therefore systematically overexpressed genes in the AAA biosynthesis pathway to identify additional bottlenecks. For this, we used the strain QL05 harboring the PAL branch, as it had the highest flux toward p-HCA. Among the genes tested, overexpression of PHA2 (strain QL07, Fig. 2b) led to a significant (p < 0.05) increase in p-HCA production by about 23%, compared with strain QL05. Though individual expression of ARO2, ARO1, or ARO3 did not display any significant effect on the production of p-HCA, combining all three genes increased p-HCA production by 36% (strain QL11, Fig. 2b) in comparison with strain QL05. Moreover, when introducing Pha2 together with Aro1, 2, and 3 (strain QL12, Fig. 2b), p-HCA production almost doubled compared with that of QL05, clearly pointing to there being untapped potential at this point in the metabolic network for enlarging flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway.
Overexpression of Aro1, 2, and 3 (strain QL17) in the TAL branch however, only had a moderate impact on the production of p-HCA, compared with strain QL16 (Fig. 2c), suggesting that the availability of tyrosine as a precursor is not limiting for p-HCA production. This led us to speculate that tyrosine ammonia lyase may be a bottleneck. Interesting though, when we combined FjTAL with the enhanced phenylalanine (ePhe)-PAL branch (strain QL12) giving strain QL18, p-HCA production increased by a factor of 99 ± 36 mg L−1 (Fig. 2d), which was much larger than p-HCA production conferred by the TAL branch alone (strain QL13, Fig. 2c), pointing to a synergistic effect between these two pathways. It is not clear whether prephenate dehydrogenase Tyr1, which is native to yeast, is regulated by tyrosine concentrations, and if overexpression of this enzyme would have a negative impact on p-HCA production30. We therefore turned to other variants of Tyr1, such as PDH1 from Glycine max (GmPDH1) and Medicago truncatula (MtPDH1), and tyrC from Zymomonas mobilis (ZmtyrC) to see if this would alleviate possible limitations in metabolic flux, which had been mediated by the native Tyr1. Indeed, all three variants were able to enhance p-HCA production, with MtPDH1 showing the highest increase in production, giving a p-HCA titer of 1641.7 mg L−1 and a yield of 82.1 mg g−1 on glucose (strain QL21, Fig. 2d).
After remedying the carbon flux from the precursors PEP and E4P toward p-HCA, we next tested the impact of reducing by-product formation in strain QL21 by deletion of PDC5 and ARO10, as has been previously implemented30,31. The resulting double-deletion strain (QL158) did not significantly (p = 0.19) improve p-HCA production (Fig. 2d). However, deletion of PDC5 and ARO10 had a significant effect on cell growth (Supplementary Fig. 4), leading us to conclude that these deletions, at least at this stage, were unsuitable for integrating into our engineering strains. To further increase the flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway, we next moved to increasing the availability of E4P, a limiting precursor for AAA biosynthesis.
Rewiring carbon distribution toward E4P
To overcome the intrinsic scarcity of E4P required for AAA biosynthesis, we implemented a heterologous phosphoketolase (PHK) pathway, including a phosphoketolase from Bifidobacterium breve (Bbxfpk) and a phosphotransacetylase from Clostridium kluyveri (Ckpta). Phosphoketalose is able to split fructose-6-phosphate into E4P and acetyl-phosphate (Fig. 3a); therefore, introduction of this pathway could, theoretically, divert part of the carbon flux from glycolysis directly toward E4P. This theory was indeed supported by intracellular sugar phosphate profiling, showing that E4P concentration was enhanced by 5.4-fold in the BbXfpk-expressing strain32. DAHP synthase has low affinity toward E4P (Km of 500 µM, Aro4)16, and elevated levels of E4P should therefore increase the flux through this first committed step of AAA biosynthesis.
To validate our strategy, we started with a simple background strain that contained only the PAL branch pathway for p-HCA production. However, insertion of this pathway alone into the basic PAL branch strain had no significant impact (p = 0.47) on p-HCA production (strain QL22, Fig. 3b), even when this was coupled to the overexpression of wild-type DAHP synthase Aro4 (Supplementary Fig. 5). As there is tight regulation on DAHP synthase, we also combined the PHK pathway with a feedback-insensitive DAHP synthase mutant Aro4K229L (strain QL23), enabling a 26% improvement in p-HCA production compared with strain QL02 (Fig. 3b). Moreover, combining this pathway with the expression of both Aro4K229L and Aro7G141S (strain QL24) led to the production of 656.4 mg L−1 of p-HCA, a 18% enhancement in p-HCA production levels, compared with strain QL04 (Fig. 3b).
Phosphoketolase expression was also found to have a positive effect on p-HCA production in the TAL branch (Supplementary Fig. 6). These results suggest that the introduction of the PHK pathway is effective in channeling more carbon flux toward E4P formation, thus enhancing the production of p-HCA. As a comparison, we also tested the overexpression of the transketolase-encoding gene TKL1, a common strategy implemented in both E. coli17 and in S. cerevisiae20 for optimizing E4P formation. Tkl1 overexpression, however, resulted in a lower titer of p-HCA production (strain QL31, Fig. 3c) compared with the introduction of the PHK pathway (strain QL24, Fig. 3c), which, maybe not surprisingly, correlates with the preference of Tkl1 for catalyzing the opposite reaction (consuming E4P)20.
During shake-flask cultivation, the PHK pathway-containing strain (QL24) exhibited a reduced specific growth rate, from 0.35 to 0.29 h−1, and an increased accumulation of acetate, from 0.32 to 1.10 g L−1, in comparison with strain QL04, which did not contain this pathway (Supplementary Fig. 7). These phenotypes have been observed before due, to a large extent, to nonspecific native phosphatases that can degrade the product, acetyl-phosphate, resulting in acetate formation that can hinder cell growth33,34. To counter against this, we tested three different strategies: (i) deletion of glycerol-1-phosphatase-encoding gene GPP1 to reduce acetate formation, (ii) expression of a heterologous acetyl-CoA synthetase variant SeAcsL641P from Samonella enterica to increase acetate consumption, or (iii) expression of a second copy of the phosphotransacetylase-encoding gene Ckpta to reduce acetate accumulation. The best outcome was with GPP1 deletion, in which acetate accumulation was significantly reduced (strain QL32, Supplementary Fig. 7), alongside a concomitant increase in p-HCA levels by 17% (strain QL32, Supplementary Fig. 8). Due to this positive effect, we decided to combine the PHK pathway with the deletion of GPP1, then we reexamined its effect on p-HCA production through the PAL branch base strains (Fig. 3d). With GPP1 deletion, the introduction of the PHK pathway enabled more than 40% improvement in p-HCA production, demonstrating the potential of this pathway for channeling more flux toward E4P generation (Fig. 3b, d).
Dynamic control strategy to increase p-HCA production
So far, we have proven that introduction of the PHK pathway is an effective approach to increase the metabolic flux of AAA biosynthesis and subsequently elevate levels of p-HCA being produced. We next combined this strategy with an enhanced supply of phenylalanine and tyrosine (ePhe and eTyr, via alleviation of bottlenecks in the AAA biosynthesis pathway) for p-HCA production (Fig. 4a). Expression of the PHK pathway genes, Bbxfpk and Ckpta, under the control of the constitutive strong promoters TDH3p and tHXT7p in strain QL21, together with the GPP1 deletion resulted in a p-HCA titer of 1802.9 mg L−1 (strain QL35), representing a 10% increase compared with strain QL21 (Fig. 4b). However, this increase was less pronounced than the PAL branch base strains, which demonstrated more than 40% enhancements upon the same introduction of GPP1 deletion and PHK pathway (strain QL04 and QL32, Fig. 3b, d), suggesting that downstream flux for converting AAA substrates to p-HCA was in some way limited. In addition, a significant decrease in cell growth was observed accompanied by the increased p-HCA production for strain QL35 (Supplementary Fig. 9). Such impairment in cell growth may indicate that rewiring carbon distribution by phosphoketolase expression leads to an insufficient supply of carbon needed for the generation of biomass.
To fine-tune the expression levels so far attained, we next employed dynamic control by using the well-characterized GALp expression system to control the expression of heterologous genes that divert AAAs toward p-HCA synthesis (Fig. 4a). GAL expression is only responsive to galactose exposure without glucose repression, which can in turn facilitate cell growth under excess glucose conditions. The expression of genes under GAL promoter control has also shown to be much stronger when compared with normally employed strong constitutive promoters such as TEF1p and TDH3p35. Therefore, the GALp-controlled expression system was first tested for both the PAL and TAL branch genes. To enable this, the structural genes GAL7/1/10 were deleted in QL21 to confer galactose as a gratuitous inducer, with GAL1, GAL2, and GAL7 promoters being used to control expression of AtPHA2, AtC4H, and FjTAL. The resultant strain QL36 produced 10% higher of p-HCA than that of QL21 (Fig. 4c), which indeed proved that the GAL promoters were more suitable in this instance than the constitutive TEF1 and TDH3 promoters. Consequently, we then examined phosphoketolase expression in QL36 either under the control of a constitutive promoter or galactose-regulated promoter systems. Strain QL37 with the constitutive promoter control system produced p-HCA at a level of 2116.7 mg L−1, whereas incorporation of the galactose-induced expression cassette led to a more significant (p < 0.01) increase in p-HCA titer to 2406.1 mg L−1 (strain QL38), a 33% increase compared with QL36 (Fig. 4c). Moreover, when using this background (strain QL36), inducible expression of phosphoketolase showed less significant effects on cell growth (Supplementary Fig. 10).
Balancing the availability of PEP and E4P
Carbon redistribution via the expression of the PHK pathway combined with further optimization by using a GAL control system (strain QL38) together, led to about a 50% improvement in p-HCA production compared with strain QL21 (Fig. 4c). Next, we asked if the carbon distribution can be further optimized between glycolysis and the AAA biosynthesis pathway through channeling more flux through the PHK pathway. We speculated that one target could be phosphofructokinase, which competes with phosphoketolase for the substrate fructose-6-phosphate (Fig. 5a). We also hypothesized that pyruvate kinase could be another potential target as this enzyme converts most of PEP, the other AAA biosynthesis precursor, into pyruvate (Fig. 5a). To target the controlled expression of these two enzymes, we created a promoter library to replace the original promoters of PFK1, PFK2, and PYK1, which encode phosphofructokinase and pyruvate kinase, respectively. As shown in Fig. 5a, for each of three genes, 10 different promoters, exhibiting differential transcriptional strength in the presence of glucose (based on a previous report36), were selected. These promoters were then used to build a promoter library for fine-tuning the expression of PFK1/2 or PYK1 (a full list of promoters is available in Supplementary Table 1). To screen the promoter-replaced strains in a high-throughput manner, a recently reported l-Tyr-derived pigment, betaxanthin-formation pathway37, was employed, allowing carbon redirection to occur alongside colorimetric changes in culture appearance due to the formation of betaxanthin, which is yellow pigmented.
For optimizing this method, we built a betaxanthin pathway that contains two enzymatic steps for converting l-Tyr to betaxanthin by using several different background strains, testing the results both on agar plates and in liquid medium (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Fig. 11). To prevent color saturation at the beginning of the screen, due to the already high flux toward l-Tyr, we used strain QL45, which only had the PHK pathway and feedback-insensitive Aro4K229L, as the host for promoter library screening. We then co-transformed 30 promoter cassettes and a triple gRNA vector into this strain and selected transformants by using glucose as the sole carbon source. From these transformants, eight colonies displaying enhanced color intensity were selected and subjected to identification of promoter substitutions (Supplementary Table 2). These strains were then characterized for cell growth and betaxanthin color intensity (Supplementary Fig. 12). Of these promoter substitutions, the two most optimal combinations were as follows: first, the replacement of PFK1, PFK2, and PYK1 native promoters with SET3p, CDC24p, and ALD5p; second, the substitution of PFK1, PFK2, and PYK1 native promoters with ILV3p, CDC24p, and LYS20p, respectively. Reconstruction of these genes with these promoter replacements in the high producer strain QL38 resulted in strains QL50 and QL56, containing the first and second combination of replacement promoters, respectively (Fig. 5b). Both strains rendered a further increase in the titer of p-HCA with the best-performing strain, QL50, producing 2680.2 mg L−1 of p-HCA, a 11% increase compared with QL38.
Although deletion of the GAL7/1/10 gene cluster strains were not able to metabolize galactose, these strains still require a low concentration of galactose for induction of the PAL, TAL, and PHK pathway genes transcribed by GAL promoters. To avoid the use of galactose, we deleted the GAL80 gene (Fig. 5c), allowing for the induction of galactose-regulated genes upon the release of carbon repression such as by glucose. This approach has been reported to work under similar conditions to ours under glucose-limited fed-batch fermentation conditions without the addition of galactose38.
As previously reported, increased fluxes in the AAA biosynthesis pathway led to a significant increase in fusel aromatic compounds14 with the deletion of ARO10 and PDC5 effectively blocking this route for AAA degradations30,31. Indeed, phenylethanol, p-hydroxyphenylethanol, and the related acids were found to be accumulated in strain QL38, while knocking out both ARO10 and PDC5 (Fig. 5a) significantly reduced these by-products (strain QL57, Supplementary Fig. 13). Interestingly, unlike our earlier attempt to remove the AAA degradation pathway, the introduction of these two deletions at this stage of our work, led to less significant negative impact on cell growth (Supplementary Fig. 14). Consequently, the double deletion was able to further enhance the production of p-HCA by 11% (strain QL57, Fig. 5c). These effects were similarly seen in the strain with promoter replacements (QL50). Interestingly, the accumulation of by-products, such as phenylethanol and phenylacetate, was further increased in strain QL50, compared with that detected in QL38 (Supplementary Fig. 13), indicating that the carbon flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway had been further increased in QL50. As a result, the double deletions in the promoter-substituted strain led to further enhanced p-HCA production, reaching a titer of 3021.2 mg L−1 in the shake-flask cultivation (strain QL58, Fig. 5c), a 26% improvement compared with QL38. Furthermore, in strain QL58, a yield of 151.1 mg g−1 glucose was achieved, corresponding to ~43% of the maximum theoretical yield possible (this being 0.3494 g/g).
High-level production of p-HCA
The production of p-HCA in our best-performing strain (QL58) was almost doubled compared with that of QL158, confirming that the PHK pathway-based carbon rewiring strategies we employed could effectively divert more carbon flux toward AAA biosynthesis and p-HCA production. In subsequent evaluation of these strains under glucose-limited fed-batch fermentation conditions, QL158 only produced 5.1 g L−1 of p-HCA, while QL58 produced p-HCA at a titer of 10.4 g L−1 (Supplementary Fig. 15, Fig. 6a, b). This was consistent with a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the rate of p-HCA production, which almost doubled in QL58 in comparison with QL158 (Supplementary Table 3). Furthermore, metabolic flux analysis showed that the carbon flux was redistributed among glycolysis, PPP, and AAA biosynthesis pathway in QL58 with the PHK pathway-based carbon-rewiring strategies, compared with that in QL158 lacking these carbon-rewiring strategies (Fig. 6c). These results clearly show that the glycolytic flux was diverted toward E4P formation and AAA biosynthesis, and by redistributing this flux, it was possible to achieve about twofold enhancement of carbon flux toward E4P and AAA biosynthesis in QL58 (Fig. 6c).
As diploid strains typically perform better than the corresponding haploid strains39, we further constructed a diploid strain by switching the mating type of QL58, and then mating the resulting strain with QL58 producing a diploid strain with identical chromosome pairs. The resulting diploid strain (QL60) performed slightly better than QL58, with a titer of 3098.7 mg L−1 and a yield of 154.9 mg g−1 glucose in the shake-flask cultivation (Table 1). Finally, we evaluated the performance of the diploid strain QL60, under glucose-limited fed-batch fermentation conditions, wherein p-HCA production reached 12.5 g L−1 (Fig. 6a, b and Table 1). In addition, these high titers resulted in crystallization of p-HCA in the culture broth (Fig. 6d).
Table 1.
Target compound | Characteristics of study | Titer (g L−1) | Yield (mg g–1 glucose) | Productivity (mg L–1 h–1) | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Shikimic acid | Shake flask | 1.979 | 54.4 | NDa | 22 |
Phenylethanol | Shake flask | 0.408 | 20.4 | NDa | 57 |
Resveratrol | Fed-batch bioreactor | 0.812 | 9.2 | 7.4 | 58 |
Naringenin | Batch bioreactor | 0.113 | 5.6 | 3.0 | 31 |
Vanillin ß-d-glucoside | Batch bioreactor | 0.306 | 15.3 | NDa | 59 |
Breviscapine | Fed-batch bioreactor | 0.293 | NDa | NDa | 60 |
Para-coumaric acid | Fed-batch deep-well plate | 1.93 | NDa | NDa | 30 |
Para-coumaric acid | Shake flask using FeadBeadsb | 3.02 (3.1)c | 151.1 (154.9)c | 31.5 (32.3)c | This study |
Para-coumaric acid | Fed-batch bioreactor | 10.4 (12.5)c | 125.3 (139.6)c | 107.9 (130.1)c | This study |
aND, not determined
bSlow release of glucose from elastomer discs
cValues for diploid strains
Discussion
One of the main bottlenecks in the production of aromatic chemicals occurs in the shikimate and AAA biosynthesis pathway. AAAs are less abundant than other amino acids inside the cell; moreover, the flux toward their biosynthesis is highly regulated. In particular, the availability of E4P is severely limited in many microorganisms12,17–19, resulting in a significant constraint on entry flux for AAA biosynthesis. This limitation thus represents a major challenge for producing industrially relevant aromatic chemicals at high levels. In this work, we have successfully rewired yeast central carbon metabolism to enhance flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway and support biosynthesis of the target molecule, p-HCA. This was accomplished by systematically engineering the AAA biosynthesis pathway, introducing a phosphoketalose (EC 4.1.2.22)-based pathway to divert glycolytic flux toward the formation of E4P, and further optimizing the carbon distribution between glycolysis and the AAA biosynthesis pathway through replacing the promoters of several important genes at key nodes between these two pathways, to balance the availability of the AAA precursors PEP and E4P.
Previously, production of p-HCA in yeast has been reported at a level of 1.93 g L−1, with the process carried out in an intrinsically designed fed-batch complex medium, which releases glucose from higher polysaccharides upon enzyme addition30. However, introducing the same modifications only resulted in 22.3 mg L−1 of p-HCA under our conditions, i.e., normal shake-flask batch cultivation conditions with 2% glucose (Supplementary Fig. 16). This huge difference may well be due to different medium and cultivation conditions used, as we used minimum medium under batch conditions, while Rodriguez et al. used complex medium in fed-batch model. There were also other differences, i.e., components of gene constructs like promoters, terminators, and integration sites, which may also explain the different results obtained. However, the work by Rodriguez et al. did inspire us on the importance of slow glucose release by using, for example, FeedBeads (Kühner AG, Germany), which we found improved the p-HCA production without increasing the supply of glucose (Supplementary Fig. 16). This may be due to a higher flux in the PPP under glucose-limited conditions, which in turn can increase the availability of E4P, compared with normal batch conditions40. The beneficial effect of the fed-batch model was further confirmed when this strategy was used alongside targeting of the PAL branch-based pathway for p-HCA production (Supplementary Fig. 17).
Compared with the TAL branch, utilization of the PAL branch-based pathway demonstrated a significantly improved approach for p-HCA production. Moreover, through systematic overexpression of individual genes involved in phenylalanine biosynthesis, Pha2 was identified as a bottleneck in p-HCA production (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, this was further proven by overexpression of PHA2 in a strain with further enhanced flux through the shikimic acid pathway, via additional expression of the PHK pathway together with GPP1 deleted, leading to a 50% increase in p-HCA production (QL288, Supplementary Fig. 18). In contrast to what is known in bacterial systems, no information is available for how prephenate dehydrogenase encoded by PHA2 is regulated in yeast. These results therefore bring to attention that the formation of phenylpyruvate catalyzed by Pha2 is an important flux-controlling step in the production of phenylalanine and its derivatives.
The synergistic effect of combining the TAL branch with the PAL branch may well have resulted from relieving feedback inhibition of Tyr1, as the expression of Tyr1 has previously been shown to be inhibited by the presence of phenylalanine41. However, by expressing a heterologous variant of Tyr1 from plant M. truncatula, we were able to bypass to some extent this feedback inhibition, enabling a further increase in p-HCA production by more than 30% (Fig. 2d). These results clearly point to the conversion of prephenate into 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate, which is catalyzed by Tyr1, to be a limiting step in the production of tyrosine and its derivatives.
After unlocking several bottlenecks in the AAA biosynthesis pathway, we found it to be possible to divert more carbon flux through the shikimate pathway. We were able to enhance the entrance flux toward AAAs and the availability of E4P by expressing a phosphoketolase (EC 4.1.2.22) having high capability for converting fructose-6-phosphate to acetyl-phosphate and E4P33. The phosphoketolase enzyme (BbXfpk) used in this study still has a specific activity toward xylulose-5-phosphate, at a greater affinity than that toward fructose-6-phophate, with a ratio close to 3:2. Nonetheless, the intracellular concentrations of fructose-6-phophate under our conditions was present at higher concentrations than xylulose-5-phosphate42, making it possible to divert glycolytic flux directly toward the formation of E4P. Indeed, our results showed that expression of this pathway together with feedback-insensitive mutants of Aro4K229L and Aro7G141S improved p-HCA production (Fig. 3b). However, one issue with this pathway was that nonspecific native phosphatases, such as Gpp1, could convert the forming product, acetyl-phosphate, into acetate, which showed to have an adverse effect on cell growth33,34 (Supplementary Fig. 7). By deleting GPP1, we were therefore able to further enhance the production of p-HCA levels (Fig. 3d). The production level in the resulting strain QL32 had a 40% improvement when compared with QL04, which only carried the feedback-insensitive mutants of Aro4K229L and Aro7G141S (Fig. 3b, d), clearly demonstrating the potential of this strategy for the production of AAAs and products derived thereof.
The increase in p-HCA levels in QL35, through the introduction of the phosphoketolase pathway, was not very significant (10%, Fig. 4b). However, by using dynamic control via the GALp-controlled expression system, which fine-tuned phosphoketolase expression as well as the PAL and TAL branch genes (strain QL38), the production of p-HCA could be enhanced by about 50% (Fig. 4c), confirming the power of phosphoketolase to channel carbon flux toward AAA biosynthesis. This could be attributed to two reasons: first, GALp-induced expression decoupled cell growth on glucose from the production of p-HCA upon galactose induction, which could have in turn enabled the repression of expression during strain construction. This may have thus prevented the deprivation of precursors needed for cell growth or the accumulation of potential toxic intermediates, which could have resulted in strain instability38. Second, GALp alone has been proven to be an even stronger promoter than those normally employed such as constitutive TEF1p and TDH3p35. On the other hand, these results also implied that channeling AAAs to the production of p-HCA could be a limiting factor, as ARO10 and PDC5 deletions in QL158 did not redirect carbon flux toward p-HCA biosynthesis (Fig. 2d). In line with this, double deletion of ARO10 and PDC5 in a strain containing increased upstream carbon flux and optimized downstream flux toward product formation (via dynamic control) led to significantly improved p-HCA production (strain QL57, Fig. 5c). In addition, when carbon flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway had been further increased (QL50, Supplementary Fig. 13), a further increase in p-HCA production can be seen with these double deletions (strain QL58, Fig. 5c), which would otherwise have led to production and excretion of fusel aromatic compounds as a carbon sink14.
After proving the capability of the PHK pathway to channel carbon flux toward E4P formation and AAA biosynthesis, we next optimized carbon distribution by replacing the promoters for genes PFK1/2 and PYK1, two key nodes that can affect the substrate availability for the shikimate pathway (Fig. 5a). By employing a recently published betaxanthin-based screening method, a small library of promoters for these three genes was transformed and selected, to balance the availability of E4P and PEP. Indeed, reconstruction of these promoter substitutions in strain QL38, containing an optimized AAA biosynthesis pathway, resulted in an additional 11% improvement in p-HCA production. By combining these promoter replacements with the removal of downstream competing pathways, the production of p-HCA could be further improved, reaching a titer of 3021.2 mg L−1 in the shake-flask cultivations, and a yield of 151.1 mg g−1 on glucose (Fig. 5c). This is an almost twofold increase in total p-HCA attained, compared with strain QL158 that lacked this carbon-rewiring strategy.
To discuss and showcase the utility of our optimized strains in the production of other value-added aromatic compounds, we engineered and evaluated the resveratrol biosynthetic pathway in our engineered strains (Supplementary Fig. 19a). Introduction of Arabidopsis thaliana 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 (At4CL1) and Vitis vinifera stilbene synthase (VvSTS) into strain QL58 produced only 32.1 mg L−1 of resveratrol. However, ~2500 mg L−1 p-HCA accumulated in this strain (QL375, Supplementary Fig. 19b), indicating that another precursor, malonyl-CoA, was limiting. Indeed, by further combination of the deregulated mutant ACC1S659A, S1157A 43, resveratrol production was significantly (p < 0.001) increased, reaching a titer of 263.4 mg L−1 (QL379, Supplementary Fig. 19b), which is comparable with the level reported for production of this compound in shake-flask cultivation of yeast cells44. It is also interesting to be noted that in this strain, almost 2 g L−1 p-HCA was found to remain, again demonstrating that the strategies we employed were efficient at enhancing carbon flux through the AAA biosynthesis pathway.
By using the measured data from strain QL158 (without carbon-rewiring strategies) and strain QL58 (with carbon-rewiring strategies) during glucose-limited fed-batch fermentation, an FBA analysis revealed that carbon flux was redistributed among glycolysis, PPP, and AAA biosynthesis pathway, when implementing the PHK pathway-based carbon-rewiring strategies (Fig. 6c). In particular, these results showed that our strategies enabled about a twofold increase of the available carbon flux toward E4P and AAA biosynthesis. Finally, in a fed-batch fermentation, a titer of 10.4 g L−1 was achieved, an experiment that, when replicated by using a diploid strain with the same genetic modifications, produced a titer of 12.5 g L−1 p-HCA (Fig. 6a). Although further optimization may well be required, we are confident that the carbon-rewiring strategies presented here provide a promising platform for the production of many other flavonoids and alkaloids derived from phenylalanine and tyrosine.
Methods
Construction of strains and reagents
E. coli DH5α was used for the construction and propagation of all plasmids. All plasmids and S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 1 and 3. High-fidelity Phusion DNA polymerase and Gibson assembly kit were purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA). PrimeStar DNA polymerase and SapphireAmp® Fast PCR Master Mix were purchased from TaKaRa Bio (Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan). Restriction enzymes, plasmid miniprep, and DNA gel purification kits were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). All codon-optimized heterologous genes were provided by GenScript (Nanjing, China) and listed in Supplementary Data 5. All oligonucleotides (Supplementary Data 6) were synthesized at Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All chemicals including analytical standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless stated otherwise.
Strain cultivation
Yeast strains for preparation of competent cells were cultivated in YPD consisting of 20 g L−1 peptone (BD DifcoTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 10 g L−1 yeast extract (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and 20 g L−1 glucose (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). Strains containing URA3-based plasmids were selected on synthetic complete medium without uracil (SC-URA), which consisted of 6.7 g L−1 yeast nitrogen base (YNB) without amino acids (FormediumTM, Norfolk, UK), 0.77 g L−1 complete supplement mixture without uracil (CSM-URA, FormediumTM, Norfolk, UK), 20 g L−1 glucose (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), and 20 g L−1 agar (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The URA3 marker was removed and selected against on SC with 5-fluoroorotic acid (SC + 5-FOA) plates containing 6.7 g L−1 YNB, 0.77 g L−1 complete supplement mixture, and 0.8 g L−1 5-FOA.
Shake-flask batch fermentations for the production of p-coumaric acid, resveratrol, and aromatic compounds were performed in minimal medium. Three independent single colonies, with the relevant genetic modifications, were inoculated into 14-mL tubes with 1.5 mL of fresh minimal medium (7.5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4, 14.4 g L−1 KH2PO4, 0.5 g L−1 MgSO4·7H2O, and 20 g L−1 glucose), 2 mL L−1 trace metal (3.0 g L−1 FeSO4·7H2O, 4.5 g L−1 ZnSO4·7H2O, 4.5 g L−1 CaCl2·2H2O, 0.84 g L−1 MnCl2·2H2O, 0.3 g L−1 CoCl2·6H2O, 0.3 g L−1 CuSO4·5H2O, 0.4 g L−1 Na2MoO4·2H2O, 1.0 g L−1 H3BO3, 0.1 g L−1 KI, and 19.0 g L−1 Na2EDTA·2H2O), and 1 mL L−1 vitamin solutions (0.05 g L−1 d-biotin, 1.0 g L−1 d-pantothenic acid hemicalcium salt, 1.0 g L−1 thiamin–HCl, 1.0 g L−1 pyridoxin–HCl, 1.0 g L−1 nicotinic acid, 0.2 g L−1 4-aminobenzoic acid, and 25.0 g L−1 myo-inositol)45 supplemented with 60 mg L−1 uracil if needed. Tubes were incubated at 30 °C with 200-rpm agitation overnight. Precultures were then inoculated into a 125-mL non-baffled flask carrying 20 mL of minimal medium at an initial optical density measured at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.05 and cultivated at 200 rpm, 30 °C for 72 h. When shake-flask fermentations were conducted to mimic fed-batch conditions, six tablets of FeedBeads46 (SMFB08001, Kuhner Shaker, Basel, Switzerland), corresponding to 20 g L−1 glucose, were used as the sole carbon source and cultivated for 96 h at 30 °C with 200-rpm agitation. To induce the transcription of genes under the control of GAL promoters, 1% galactose was supplemented into the medium as the gratuitous inducer. For fermentation of strains harboring gal80 deletion, no galactose was added.
Bioreactor cultivations for p-HCA production were performed in 1.0-L vessels by using the DasGip Parallel Bioreactors System (DasGip, Germany). The initial batch fermentation was started with 0.25 L of minimal medium containing 20 g L−1 glucose. By using a DasGip Control 4.0 System, the temperature was controlled at 30 °C, and the initial agitation was set to 800 rpm and increased to maximally 1200 rpm depending on the dissolved oxygen level, which was maintained above 40% via stirrer speed and gas flow rate by using the DasGip control system. The aeration was controlled by using a DasGip MX4/4 module and initially provided at 36 L h−1. The pH was maintained at 5.6 by automatic addition of 4 M KOH and 2 M HCl. The exhaust gas was monitored by using a DasGip Offgas Analyzer GA4. Addition of the acid, base, and glucose feeding was conducted with DasGip MP8 multi-pump modules (pump head tubing: 0.5-mm ID, 1.0-mm wall thickness). During the fed-batch phase, the cells were fed with a 200 g L−1 glucose solution with a feed rate that exponentially increased (µ set to 0.05 h−1) to maintain a constant biomass-specific glucose consumption rate. The initial feeding rate was calculated by using the biomass yield and concentration that were obtained during prior duplicate batch cultivations with these strains. The feeding was initiated after the CO2 levels dropped indicating that glucose was depleted. Physiological parameters and fluxes (q) were calculated based on samples taken during the glucose-limited feeding phase, with the biomass composition of CH1.8O0.5N0.2 being assumed.
Dry cell weight (DCW) measurements were performed by filtering 5 mL of broth through a preweighed 0.45-µm filter membrane (Sartorius Biolab, Göttingen, Germany). The filter was washed once before and three times after filtering the broth with 5 mL of deionized water. All filters were heated in the microwave oven for 15 min and dried for 2 days in a desiccator before measuring the weight increase. During the fermentation process, crystals of p-HCA were found to form and accumulate on the filters for measuring DCW. For the imaging of p-HCA crystals, 3 μl of QL58 cell cultures cultivated in the bioreactor for 96 h were dropped onto a microscope slide and viewed with a LEICA DM2000 fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) with a ×100 oil objective and processed with the Lecia Application Suite software.
Genetic manipulation
S. cerevisiae strain CEN.PK113-5D-derivative IMX581 (MATa ura3-52 can1∆::cas9-natNT2 TRP1 LEU2 HIS3) was used as the background strain for all genetic manipulations. IMX581 harbors an integrated Cas9 expression cassette under the control of constitutive TEF1 promoter47. For gene overexpression, DNA integration constructs were produced and integrated at selected genomic loci via the CRISPR/cas9 system. All native promoters, genes, and terminators were PCR amplified by using IMX581 genomic DNA as the template. For optimized heterologous genes, synthetic fragments (obtained from GenScript) or plasmids were used for PCR amplification (Supplementary Data 1). High-fidelity Phusion DNA polymerase was utilized throughout the entire molecular cloning procedure, except PrimeSTAR HS polymerase was employed for in vitro DNA part fusion and module generation. Functional expression modules were generated according to overlapping extension PCR (OE-PCR) procedure48. All used integration cassettes are listed in Supplementary Data 2.
All gene overexpression cassettes were integrated into designed chromosomal loci that have been demonstrated to provide stable and high-level expression of heterologous genes49. By taking the example of targeted integration of M1 at the XII-2 locus in strain IMX581, the whole pathway was divided into two fragments: I (XII-2 us-GPM1p-AtPAL2-FBA1t-CYC1t-AtC4H-TDH3p-tHXT7p) and II (TDH3p-tHXT7p-AtATR2-pYX212t-ADH1t-CYB5-PGK1p-XII-2 ds). Fragment I was assembled by fusing DNA from XII-2 us, GPM1p, AtPAL2, FBA1t-CYC1t, AtC4H, and TDH3p-tHXT7p. In detail, the upstream homologous arm XII-2 us (Supplementary Data 4) and GPM1p were amplified from IMX581 genomic DNA with primer pairs P92/P93 and P1/P2, respectively; the bidirectional promoters TDH3p-tHXT7p and terminators FBA1t-CYC1t were amplified from pFab1 by using primer pairs P9/P11 and P3/P6, respectively; genes AtPAL2 and AtC4H were amplified from pCfB1018 by using primer pairs P36/P38 and P40/P42, respectively. Fragment II was assembled by fusing the DNA parts of TDH3p-tHXT7p, AtPAL2, pYX212t, ADH1t, CYB5, PGK1p, and XII-2 ds. Genes AtATR2 and CYB5 were amplified from pCfB848 by using primer pairs P43/P44 and P45/P46, respectively; promoter PGK1p was amplified from pFab1 by using primer pairs P16/P17; terminators pYX212t and ADH1t were amplified from pFab1 by using primer pairs P12/P13 and P14/P15, respectively; the downstream homologous arm XII-2 ds (Supplementary Data 4) was amplified from IMX581 genomic DNA with primer pair P94/P95. To construct the fusion protein of 4-coumarate-CoA ligase 1 (At4CL1) and stilbene synthase (VvSTS), one copy of a flexible linker GSG was used. Then co-transformation of equimolar amounts of purified fragments I and II (50–100 ng/kb) with gRNA plasmid pQC007 (~300–500 ng) into S. cerevisiae was conducted according to the described protocol47, and transformants were selected on SC-URA plates. Clones were verified by colony PCR by using SapphireAmp® Fast PCR Master Mix. Subsequently, three clones with correct module integration were cultivated overnight in YPD liquid medium and then streaked onto SC + FOA plates after washing to loop out of gRNA vectors and recycle the URA3 marker. For gene deletion, 2 µg of a double-stranded DNA fragment consisting of two 60-bp sequences homologous to up‐ and downstream regions of the chromosomal target site was used for the homologous repair of the genome double-strand break introduced by cleavage of the Cas9 nuclease. For the construction of the promoter-substitution strain library, the native promoters of PFK1 (from −162 to 0 bp), PFK2 (from −63 to 0 bp), and PYK1 (from −150 to 0 bp) were replaced by selected promoters in Supplementary Table 1 by using the CRISPR/cas9 system. For the construction of the diploid strain, CRISPR/cas9-based mating-type switching50 was employed, and PCR was performed to identify correct transformants by using mating-type specific primer pairs51. To render galactose as a gratuitous inducer for the activation of GAL promoters, genes GAL7/10/1 were deleted in the QL36 background. Furthermore, deletion of GAL80 was introduced into the QL57 background to enable induction of GAL promoters without the addition of galactose under FeedBeads-based shake-flask cultivations and in glucose-limited fed-batch bioreactor fermentations. The schematic overview of construction of strains is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.
To select for specific guide RNAs, all potential gRNAs for a selected gene/genomic locus were compared with all potential off-targets in the entire CEN.PK113-7D genome by using CRISPRdirect tool52, a freely available tool provided at http://crispr.dbcls.jp/. All single and double gRNA plasmids were constructed following in vitro Gibson assembly method in which gRNA sequence-containing DNA fragments were recombined with vector backbone47. Two triple gRNA plasmids pQC156 and pQC185 were constructed by Gibson assembly in which the donor single and receptor double gRNA vectors were involved. Specifically, gRNA expression cassettes for PYK1p and GAL80 were amplified from pQC117 and pQC003, respectively, by primers P262 and P263. The resultant fragments were gel-purified and ligated with EcoRV-digested receptor plasmids pQC120 and pQC184, respectively. Correct recombinant plasmids were then verified by sequencing.
Promoter-substituted library construction and identification
To identify a suitable starting strain for the construction of the promoter screening library, the growth and betaxanthin accumulation profiles of strains QL44–QL47 and the parental strain IMX581 were evaluated on both solid SC plates and liquid minimal media. Overnight cultures were harvested, and the resultant cell pellets were washed twice with fresh minimal medium. For the spot test, about 1 × 105 cells were used, and the initial OD600 value for liquid was kept at 0.05. Both plates and tubes were photographed at shown time intervals (Supplementary Fig. 11).
For screening of promoter-substitution strains, 30 replacement cassettes (Supplementary Data 2) and a triple gRNA vector pQC156 were co-transformed into strain QL45. Transformants were then plated on four SC-URA plates at a density of ~500 colonies per plate. Approximately 300 colonies that appeared to have a relatively higher color intensity compared with the rest of the population were selected and inoculated into 1 mL of minimal medium and grown for 24 h at 30 °C with 200-rpm agitation. The final OD values and color change of the resulting cultures were then compared with that of the background strain QL45 in the first round of screening. Subsequently, the eight most intensely yellow-pigmented colonies were isolated for further growth analysis and identified for their promoter integration profile. For the evaluation of betaxanthin accumulation by using FeedBeads as the sole carbon source, overnight cultures of selected strains were transferred to 20 mL of fresh minimal medium (OD600 = 0.05, six tablets of FeedBeads SMFB08001) and cultivated at 30 °C with 200-rpm agitation. One-hundred microliter cell cultures were transferred to microplates and measured for OD600 and fluorescence37 (excitation: 485 nm, emission: 520 nm, and gain: 200) in a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany) with an interval of 12 h. The background fluorescence measurements of parental strain IMX581 were subtracted to determine their final fluorescence intensity.
Metabolite extraction and quantification
p-HCA and resveratrol production in whole-cell cultures were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)30,44. Specifically, 0.5 mL of cell culture was mixed with an equal volume of absolute ethanol (100% v/v), vortexed thoroughly, and centrifuged at 13,500 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were analyzed on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a Discovery HS F5 150-mm × 4.6-mm column (particle size 5 µm) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) connected to a photodiode array detector. The column was kept at 30 °C, and metabolites from 10 µL of supernatants were separated. For p-HCA and resveratrol detection, a flow rate set to 1.5 mL min−1 was used. Samples were analyzed by using a gradient method with two solvents: 10 mM ammonium formate, pH 3.0 (A) and acetonitrile (B). The program started with 5% of solvent B (0–0.5 min), after which its fraction was increased linearly from 5% to 60% (0.5–9.5 min), then the fraction was increased from 60% to 100% (9.5–10.5 min) and maintained at 100% for 0.5 min (10.5–11 min), and at last the fraction was decreased from 100% to 50% (11–11.5 min) and maintained at 5% for 1.5 min (11.5–13 min). p-HCA was detected at 6.3 min (304 nm), resveratrol at 7.6 min (333 nm).
The production of aromatic compounds was quantified by HPLC14,24. One millilliter of culture broth was centrifuged at 13,500 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was frozen at −20 °C. An aliquot of 400 µL of the culture supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of absolute ethanol (100% v/v), vortexed thoroughly, and centrifuged at 13,500 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were used for analysis of aromatic compounds. Two elution systems were used to detect the aromatic compounds. For p-hydroxyphenylacetate, p-hydroxyphenylethanol, p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate, tryptophol, and chorismate, samples were analyzed by using a gradient method with two solvents: water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min−1. The program started with 5% of solvent B (0–0.5 min), after which its fraction was increased linearly from 5% to 60% (0.5–18.5 min), then the fraction was maintained at 60% (18.5–20.5 min), after that the fraction was decreased from 60% to 5% (20.5–21 min), and finally, the fraction was maintained at 5% (21–22 min). p-Hydroxyphenylacetate was detected at 7.5 min (276 nm), p-hydroxyphenylethanol at 6.5 min (276 nm), p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate at 10.2 min (304 nm), tryptophol at 11.5 min (276 nm), and chorismate at 6.1 min (276 nm). For phenylethanol and phenylacetate, samples were analyzed by using a gradient method with two solvents: 20 mM KH2PO4 (pH 3.0) with 1% acetonitrile (A) and acetonitrile (B) at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The program increased from 0% to 10% solvent B (0–6.0 min), after which its fraction was increased linearly from 10% to 60% (6.0–25 min), then the fraction was decreased from 60% to 0% (25–26 min), and finally, the fraction was maintained at 0% for 2 min (26–28 min). Phenylethanol was detected at 15.5 min (215 nm) and phenylacetate at 17.3 min (215 nm). Authentic standards were used to generate the calibration curves for quantification of p-coumaric acid, resveratrol, and production of the other aforementioned aromatic compounds. The yield of p-HCA was calculated by dividing the mass of the product formed by the total mass of carbon (glucose) supplied at the time of culture inoculation.
The concentrations of residual glucose, ethanol, glycerol, organic acids (acetate, pyruvate, and succinate), and shikimate were determined by HPLC analysis53. Briefly, a 1.0-mL culture sample was centrifuged and filtered through a 0.45-µm syringe filter and analyzed on an Aminex HPX-87G column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) on an Ultimate 3000 HPLC. The column was eluted with 5 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 at 45 °C for 35 min.
In silico analyses
In order to perform in silico simulations, we reconstructed an enzyme-constrained model of yeast. The model is an extension of ecYeast754 with addition of the heterologous p-HCA formation pathways including both the TAL and PAL branches. As well, we collected turnover rates for all the added enzymes from the BRENDA website55 to impose enzyme usage constraints for these reactions (Supplementary Data 7).
To estimate the maximum theoretical yield of p-HCA without concurrent biomass formation or maintenance, both growth rate and the non-growth-associated maintenance were set to zero. Besides, we set the upper bound of the glucose uptake rate to 1000 mmol g DCW−1 h−1 and maximized the production rate of p-HCA. The calculated glucose uptake rate cannot reach the upper bound due to the limited protein content in the enzyme-constrained model54. The maximum theoretical yield was calculated by the p-HCA production rate over the calculated glucose uptake rate.
To estimate the flux distributions, we constrained the related exchange reaction rates to the measured data (Supplementary Table 3), except growth rate, which was maximized instead. We performed flux balance analysis (FBA) to solve the linear programming problem. The estimated growth rates were then confirmed to be consistent with the measured values for growth rate (Supplementary Data 8). All simulations were performed in MATLAB with the COBRA toolbox56. All code used in the study is available in Supplementary Data 9.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF10CC1016517 and NNF18OC0034844), the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 814650, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, FORMAS, and Stiftelsen för Internationalisering av Högre Utbildning och Forskning and Ångpanneföreningens Forskningsstiftelse. We thank Prof. Mingqiang Qiao from Nankai University (Tianjin, China) for kindly providing synthetic genes BvCYP76AD3 and MjDOD. We also appreciate valuable discussions with Zhiwei Zhu, Yi Liu, Boyang Ji, Xin Chen, and Rosemary Yu. Open access funding provided by Chalmers University of Technology.
Source Data
Author contributions
Q.L.L., J.N., and Y.C. conceived the study; Q.L.L. designed and performed all experiments and analyzed the data; Y.C. assisted with the experimental design; T.Y., X.W.L., and Yu. C. assisted with the experimental performance; Q.L.L., T.Y., X.W.L., Yu C., K.C., J.N., and Y.C. analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The source data underlying Figs. 2b–d, 3b–d, 4b, 4c, 5b, 5c, 6a, and 6b, as well as Supplementary Figs. 3–6, 8–10, 12c, 15–18, and 19b are provided as a Source Data file.
Competing interests
Q.L.L., J.N., and Y.C. are inventors on a pending patent application on utilization of phosphoketolase for the production of aromatic amino acid-derived products (EP18207629.9). All other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41467-019-12961-5.
References
- 1.Kallscheuer N, Classen T, Drepper T, Marienhagen J. Production of plant metabolites with applications in the food industry using engineered microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019;56:7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ehrenworth AM, Peralta-Yahya P. Accelerating the semisynthesis of alkaloid-based drugs through metabolic engineering. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13:249–258. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Sci. World J. 2013;2013:162750. doi: 10.1155/2013/162750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016;79:629–661. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b01055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chemler JA, Koffas MA. Metabolic engineering for plant natural product biosynthesis in microbes. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008;19:597–605. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Galanie S, Thodey K, Trenchard IJ, Filsinger Interrante M, Smolke CD. Complete biosynthesis of opioids in yeast. Science. 2015;349:1095–1100. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown S, Clastre M, Courdavault V, O’Connor SE. De novo production of the plant-derived alkaloid strictosidine in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:3205–3210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423555112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ajikumar PK, et al. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science. 2010;330:70–74. doi: 10.1126/science.1191652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pandey RP, Parajuli P, Koffas MAG, Sohng JK. Microbial production of natural and non-natural flavonoids: pathway engineering, directed evolution and systems/synthetic biology. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016;34:634–662. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rodriguez A, et al. Engineering Escherichia coli to overproduce aromatic amino acids and derived compounds. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014;13:126. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0126-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jiang M, Zhang H. Engineering the shikimate pathway for biosynthesis of molecules with pharmaceutical activities in E. coli. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016;42:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suastegui M, Guo W, Feng X, Shao Z. Investigating strain dependency in the production of aromatic compounds in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113:2676–2685. doi: 10.1002/bit.26037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Siddiqui MS, Thodey K, Trenchard I, Smolke CD. Advancing secondary metabolite biosynthesis in yeast with synthetic biology tools. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012;12:144–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00774.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Luttik MAH, et al. Alleviation of feedback inhibition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae aromatic amino acid biosynthesis: quantification of metabolic impact. Metab. Eng. 2008;10:141–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2008.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paravicini G, Schmidheini T, Braus G. Purification and properties of the 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase (phenylalanine-inhibitable) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989;186:361–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15217.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schnappauf G, Hartmann M, Kunzler M, Braus GH. The two 3-deoxy-d-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase isoenzymes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae show different kinetic modes of inhibition. Arch. Microbiol. 1998;169:517–524. doi: 10.1007/s002030050605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Patnaik R, Liao JC. Engineering of Escherichia coli central metabolism for aromatic metabolite production with near theoretical yield. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994;60:3903–3908. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.11.3903-3908.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Flores N, Xiao J, Berry A, Bolivar F, Valle F. Pathway engineering for the production of aromatic compounds in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996;14:620–623. doi: 10.1038/nbt0596-620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ikeda M. Towards bacterial strains overproducing L-tryptophan and other aromatics by metabolic engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006;69:615–626. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-0252-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Curran KA, Leavitt JM, Karim AS, Alper HS. Metabolic engineering of muconic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2013;15:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Deaner M, Alper HS. Systematic testing of enzyme perturbation sensitivities via graded dCas9 modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2017;40:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Suastegui M, et al. Multilevel engineering of the upstream module of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for high production of polymer and drug precursors. Metab. Eng. 2017;42:134–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sprenger GA, Schorken U, Sprenger G, Sahm H. Transketolase A of Escherichia coli K12. Purification and properties of the enzyme from recombinant strains. Eur. J. Biochem. 1995;230:525–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0525h.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gold, N. D. et al. Metabolic engineering of a tyrosine-overproducing yeast platform using targeted metabolomics. Microb. Cell Fact. 14, 73 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Zhang J, et al. Determination of the cytosolic NADPH/NADP ratio in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using shikimate dehydrogenase as sensor reaction. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12846. doi: 10.1038/srep12846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mao J, et al. Combinatorial analysis of enzymatic bottlenecks of L-tyrosine pathway by p-coumaric acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Lett. 2017;39:977–982. doi: 10.1007/s10529-017-2322-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jendresen CB, et al. Highly active and specific tyrosine ammonia-lyases from diverse origins enable enhanced production of aromatic compounds in bacteria and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;81:4458–4476. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00405-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Canelas AB, et al. Quantitative evaluation of intracellular metabolite extraction techniques for yeast metabolomics. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:7379–7389. doi: 10.1021/ac900999t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Canelas AB, et al. Integrated multilaboratory systems biology reveals differences in protein metabolism between two reference yeast strains. Nat. Commun. 2010;1:145. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rodriguez A, Kildegaard KR, Li M, Borodina I, Nielsen J. Establishment of a yeast platform strain for production of p-coumaric acid through metabolic engineering of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. Metab. Eng. 2015;31:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Koopman F, et al. De novo production of the flavonoid naringenin in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012;11:155. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bergman A, et al. Heterologous phosphoketolase expression redirects flux towards acetate, perturbs sugar phosphate pools and increases respiratory demand in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 2019;18:25. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1072-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bergman A, Siewers V, Nielsen J, Chen Y. Functional expression and evaluation of heterologous phosphoketolases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express. 2016;6:115. doi: 10.1186/s13568-016-0290-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Meadows AL, et al. Rewriting yeast central carbon metabolism for industrial isoprenoid production. Nature. 2016;537:694–697. doi: 10.1038/nature19769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blazeck J, Garg R, Reed B, Alper HS. Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;109:2884–2895. doi: 10.1002/bit.24552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Keren L, et al. Promoters maintain their relative activity levels under different growth conditions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013;9:701. doi: 10.1038/msb.2013.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.DeLoache WC, et al. An enzyme-coupled biosensor enables (S)-reticuline production in yeast from glucose. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:465–471. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Westfall PJ, et al. Production of amorphadiene in yeast, and its conversion to dihydroartemisinic acid, precursor to the antimalarial agent artemisinin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:111–118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110740109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Xie W, Lv X, Ye L, Zhou P, Yu H. Construction of lycopene-overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by combining directed evolution and metabolic engineering. Metab. Eng. 2015;30:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Papini M, Nookaew I, Uhlen M, Nielsen J. Scheffersomyces stipitis: a comparative systems biology study with the Crabtree positive yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012;11:136. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-11-136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mannhaupt G, Stucka R, Pilz U, Schwarzlose C, Feldmann H. Characterization of the prephenate dehydrogenase-encoding gene, Tyr1, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1989;85:303–311. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90422-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wasylenko TM, Stephanopoulos G. Metabolomic and (13)C-metabolic flux analysis of a xylose-consuming Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain expressing xylose isomerase. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015;112:470–483. doi: 10.1002/bit.25447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shi S, Chen Y, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Improving production of malonyl coenzyme A-derived metabolites by abolishing Snf1-dependent regulation of Acc1. mBio. 2014;5:e01130–01114. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01130-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Li M, et al. De novo production of resveratrol from glucose or ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 2015;32:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Vandijken JP. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 1992;8:501–517. doi: 10.1002/yea.320080703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jeude M, et al. Fed-batch mode in shake flasks by slow-release technique. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006;95:433–445. doi: 10.1002/bit.21012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mans, R. et al. CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res.15, fov004 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Zhou YJ, et al. Modular pathway engineering of diterpenoid synthases and the mevalonic acid pathway for miltiradiene production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:3234–3241. doi: 10.1021/ja2114486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mikkelsen MD, et al. Microbial production of indolylglucosinolate through engineering of a multi-gene pathway in a versatile yeast expression platform. Metab. Eng. 2012;14:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xie Z, et al. Rapid and efficient CRISPR/Cas9-based mating-type switching of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3. 2018;8:173–183. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Illuxley C, Green ED, Dunbam I. Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Trends Genet. 1990;6:236. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(90)90190-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Naito Y, Hino K, Bono H, Ui-Tei K. CRISPRdirect: software for designing CRISPR/Cas guide RNA with reduced off-target sites. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1120–1123. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gao Meirong, Cao Mingfeng, Suástegui Miguel, Walker James, Rodriguez Quiroz Natalia, Wu Yutong, Tribby Dana, Okerlund Adam, Stanley Levi, Shanks Jacqueline V., Shao Zengyi. Innovating a Nonconventional Yeast Platform for Producing Shikimate as the Building Block of High-Value Aromatics. ACS Synthetic Biology. 2016;6(1):29–38. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sánchez BJ, et al. Improving the phenotype predictions of a yeast genome-scale metabolic model by incorporating enzymatic constraints. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2017;13:935. doi: 10.15252/msb.20167411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jeske L, Placzek S, Schomburg I, Chang A, Schomburg D. BRENDA in 2019: a European ELIXIR core data resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D542–D549. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Heirendt L, et al. Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0. Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:639–702. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0098-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Romagnoli G, et al. Deletion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARO8 gene, encoding an aromatic amino acid transaminase, enhances phenylethanol production from glucose. Yeast. 2015;32:29–45. doi: 10.1002/yea.3015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Li M, Schneider K, Kristensen M, Borodina I, Nielsen J. Engineering yeast for high-level production of stilbenoid antioxidants. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36827. doi: 10.1038/srep36827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Brochado AR, et al. Improved vanillin production in Baker’s yeast through in silico design. Microb. Cell Fact. 2010;9:84. doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-9-84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Liu X, et al. Engineering yeast for the production of breviscapine by genomic analysis and synthetic biology approaches. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:448. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02883-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file. The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The source data underlying Figs. 2b–d, 3b–d, 4b, 4c, 5b, 5c, 6a, and 6b, as well as Supplementary Figs. 3–6, 8–10, 12c, 15–18, and 19b are provided as a Source Data file.