Nonhuman primates are important models in preclinical research enabling understanding of pathogenic mechanisms in human disease that readily translates into therapy development. Safety and efficacy testing of biologicals, such as antibodies, soluble receptors, cytokines, often preclude use of lower species, e.g. when drugs fail to bind targets. These issues explain increasing interest in nonhuman primates (NHPs) as preclinical disease models, despite costs and ethical limitations.
The aim of this feature article is to highlight the common marmoset monkey as a useful model in biomedical and preclinical translational research. We cite published studies as well as unpublished information presented at the 1st Workshop of the International Marmoset Research Group (IMRG), held on June 20-21, 2011 at the German Primate Center in Göttingen, Germany.
Marmosets as experimental model of human biology and disease
The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) is a small-bodied New World monkey (Fig.1a) widely used in studies ranging from toxicology, neurological and autoimmune diseases, and reproductive biology to stem cell biology and transgenics. Marmoset colonies are outbred, but differences exist in terms of genetic heterogeneity compared to humans. As an example, the major histocompatibility complex genomic region, which encodes central regulatory molecules of immune responses is much more polymorphic in humans and Old World monkeys than in common marmosets [1]. Laboratory-housed colonies are often kept under conventional conditions that expose monkeys to naturally occurring pathogens that shape their immune system. As a consequence, marmoset disease models are appropriately complex and their use requires in-depth knowledge of the animals’ biology and optimal laboratory management. There is already a vast body of knowledge on the marmoset as model of human disease (e.g. [2-4]) and on biotechnical aspects [5,6]. To be of use for the biomedical research community, this information needs to be readily accessible. This is task of the new International Marmoset Research Group, which aims to integrate existing activities of regional marmoset research groups, e.g., MaRGA (Americas), EMRG (Europe) and a newly established JMRS (Japanese Marmoset Research Society) harmonizing activities in Asia.
Figure 1: A marmoset with germ-line expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP).
The high reproduction rate and the relatively short time to sexual maturity makes the marmoset suitable for transgenic modification. Proof of principle was demonstrated by the germ-line expression of GFP [12]. The pictures show a normally developed transgenic marmoset (a) with expression of GFP in the skin (b). The pictures were a kind gift of Dr. Erika Sasaki, Central Institute for Experimental Animals, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
The reproducibility and quality of marmoset-based data critically depend on high quality housing and management that minimize stress and refined protocols for health surveillance and veterinary care [6,6a]. It is thus essential that data on foraging and nutrition, natural behavior and sociobiology, collected in the marmoset’s natural habitat the coastal forests of northeastern Brazil, continue to be translated into laboratory practice [7].
Marmosets in preclinical pharmacology and toxicology
Traditionally, the most frequently used NHP species for preclinical in vivo pharmacology, safety studies and toxicology assessment has been the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis, 80%), the marmoset (15%) and the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta; 5%) (G. Weinbauer, Covance Laboratories GmbH, Germany, personal communication). The main reason for the current preference of the large-sized cynomolgus monkey (± 3 kg) is the abundant background data that can be used as a reference repository. In several disease areas, however, including immune-mediated disorders [8], available models in macaques are suboptimal as they show poor resemblance with the corresponding disease in humans.
Despite more limited usage, marmosets provide highly attractive models due to their small size (± 400 g), requiring limited amounts of test compounds; high tractability, less frequent need to sedate for handling; and the use of bone marrow chimeric twins in therapy trials [2,3]. For example, using serum monoamine levels as biomarkers, Pryce and coworkers demonstrated that the variability between fraternal siblings is much lower than between siblings of different births, complementing similar data on immune profiles [9]. This is crucial information for the design of marmoset drug studies, especially since twin monkeys can be used for both preclinical toxicity and efficacy assessment [10-12].
Marmosets in molecular biology
The sequencing and annotation of the human genome is an essential step towards a better understanding of the genetic basis of human disease. The subsequent translation of genetic into functional information is a major challenge for the future. Much groundbreaking work is already done in mice that transgenetically express human genes. However, a human gene placed in a mouse cell may behave differently than in a human cell and the marmoset can be of use here.
The analysis of the marmoset genome approaches its completion (http://may2010.archive.ensembl.org/Callithrix_jacchus/Info/Index). It will soon be possible to search for the orthologues of disease-associated human genes and disable them with siRNA, for example. Gene expression profiles of marmosets can be examined with already available technology, such as the EUMAMA microarray [13].
Sasaki and co-workers have shown that generation of transgenic marmosets is technically feasible [14] (Fig.1b). Although many ethical issues need to be solved before this technology can be generally applied, it is clear that the basis for an important contribution of transgenic marmosets to functional analysis of the human genome has been laid.
Marmosets in immunology and immunopathology
Most preclinical immunology research is based on a limited selection of specific pathogen free (SPF) bred mouse and rat strains. The clean housing environment changes the maturity of the rodent immune system. Together with fundamental differences between the rodent and human immune systems, this causes a broader response to immunomodulatory therapies than observed in nonhuman primates and humans [15]. In many respects, the marmoset and human immune systems are more similar [16]. Longitudinal analysis of experimental autoimmune disease models shows that in the course of the disease the biodistribution of activated immune cells changes between the lymphoid compartments and blood. This implies that reduced activity of a cell population of interest does not imply its suppression or elimination necessarily; it can also have disappeared from detection. In mouse immunology, spleen cells are commonly used, whereas in human immunology blood cells are used. In the marmoset both compartments are accessible, enabling better translation of data from rodent disease models to patients. Adaptation and improvements of analytical methods (e.g. Meso Scale Discovery®, Luminex®) can compensate for the limited available blood volume, being – depending on the national regulations for animal welfare – 1 to 2 ml per week for an adult marmoset.
The main role of the marmoset in preclinical immunology is in immunotoxicology [17], in the modeling of two important autoimmune-mediated inflammatory disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis [18] and multiple sclerosis [19], and in airway hypersensitivity disorders [20]. The respective experimental autoimmune disease models, collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), offer distinct advantages compared to the corresponding models in macaques, which are usually more acute and severely destructive. Research into the marmoset EAE model has provided new insights into the effect of environmental pathogens, such as herpes viruses, on the immune mechanisms that initiate and perpetuate inflammation and injury of the central nervous system [21]. This creates an essentially different situation from rodent EAE models, and a vital alternative for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.
Marmosets in neuroscience
The evolutionary proximity of marmosets and humans is reflected by their comparable brain morphology, making the marmoset a potentially useful model for neuroscience and neuropathology research. The growing importance of marmosets for research in neuroscience and related fields is demonstrated by the increasing number of brain atlases based on histology and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; for example [22,23]) that enable positron emission tomography (PET) to associate drug-induced changes in behavior with anatomically specific alterations in cerebral glucose metabolism [23a].
In neuropathology, flagship models have been developed of neuroinflammation, being the already discussed EAE model for MS, and neurodegeneration, being the unilateral lesion model of the nigrostriatal bundle with the neurotoxin 6-OHDA [24] (Fig.2) and the more advanced MPTP-induced model of idiopathic Parkinsonism [25,26]. All marmoset models are valid for their human counterparts as they develop the full spectrum of symptoms of Parkinsonism. However, a shortcoming of these models is that, aggregates of misfolded α-synuclein (Lewy bodies), are not formed. This is not trivial as these can induce similar patterns of microglia activation and neurodegeneration, as observed for β-amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease [27]. This discrepancy could be overcome by inducing nigrostriatal α-synucleinopathy using viral vector-mediated overexpression of human α-synuclein [28]. In a preliminary report Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology such as extracellular Aß-plaques and even some intracellular Aß-staining localized mainly in the cortex was reported for a 23 year old male marmoset ([29], and own unpublished data).
Figure 2: Combined MRI and SPECT image of a marmoset monkey brain.
A marmoset was unilaterally lesioned with 6-hydroxy dopamine in 2003. Eight years later the depicted scans were made. The yellow/red colors indicate high density of dopamine transporters in the basal ganglia visualized with the ligand [I-123]FP-CIT. a) Coronal section; b) Transverse section; c) Sagittal section. Pictures were kindly provided by Dr. Enrique Garea-Rodríguez and Dr. Gunther Helms, Göttingen, Germany.
The costs of marmosets and ethical constraints stimulate the development of techniques for longitudinal analysis of neurological functions, aiming at collecting more data from a limited number of healthy and diseased marmosets. These comprise various in vivo imaging techniques - such as SPECT imaging [30], near infrared imaging (C. Dullin,University Medicine, Göttingen, pers. communication) and nuclear magnetic resonance based techniques, such as MRI, fMRI and MR spectroscopy [30-32] (see also Fig.2) – and telemetry as well as behavioral and (neuro)physiological tests [33,34].
Marmosets as models to study cognitive behavior
Several studies indicated that marmosets, in addition to macaques, can be the species of choice to investigate the impact of e.g. environmental manipulations, drugs and lesions on cognitive function, using tasks similar to those deployed in the study of human cognition and diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorders.
Marmosets are sensitive to changes in their environment. Conducting behavioral experiments in the home cage is advantageous in avoiding the stress of handling, to save the time it takes to move the animal to a new experimental room, and to save space, In addition, home-cage testing allows for measurement of day-to-day changes in the cognitive abilities of several animals simultaneously. In this sense, a simple and convenient testing apparatus, such as a detour reaching task or a staircase test apparatus, is advantageous for assessing the marmoset’s cognitive functions.
The most popular system for a computer-based home-cage testing has been the Monkey CANTAB (Cambridge Cognition, and later Lafayette Instrument), which was developed in the 1980s and has been frequently used on non-human primates [33]. Recently, a convenient PC-based apparatus was developed for marmosets [36]. Using this set-up in the home cage, it is possible to measure cognitive abilities from many marmosets simultaneously without any additional space/room for the experiments.
Marmoset as models to study sleep behavior and circadian rhythm
In common with man, the marmoset exhibits sleep cycles with stages alternating between non-REM (deep sleep and light sleep) and pREM sleep throughout the night. As strictly day-active animals, marmosets are ideally suited for sleep studies [35, 37]. Advanced telemetric systems for registration of EEG and EMG such as the NeuroLogger® (Newbehavior, Zurich, Switzerland) in combination with telemetric methods for acquisition of core body temperature and activity (Remo 200; Remo Technologies Ltd., Salisbury, UK) enable collection of biobehavioral data from freely moving and group-housed animals [38].
Marmosets as models for human obesity
Marmosets provide models for both spontaneous [38] and experimentally-induced obesity (virus-induced: [39]; fetal glucocorticoid hyperexposure: [40] adult high calorie diet [41]). Such models can manifest hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia [38] and illustrate how the shorter lifespan of the marmoset is particularly useful in rapidly determining the contribution of abnormal fetal metabolic environments to adult metabolic disease.
The body weight of captive marmosets has risen about 10% per decade in the last 20 years, comparable to trends in other laboratory mammals, possibly due to improved veterinary care, husbandry, understanding of nutritional requirements and environmental enrichment [42]. These demographic data underline the importance of contemporary controls in all obesity research-related experiments. In the past, marmosets have not been well utilized in obesity research partly because 85% comparability of insulin amino acid sequence between marmosets and Old World primates, together with a reduced affinity of marmoset insulin for available anti-insulin antibodies [43,44], delayed development of a validated assay for circulating insulin [4]. With an improved method for determining pancreatic insulin dysfunction in marmosets, and the recent finding that marmoset pancreatic islets more closely resemble human islets [45] than those of Old World macaques [46], the use of marmosets in designing novel therapeutic solutions to obesity is set to increase.
In this regard, new understanding of obesity development in female mouse knockout/knock-in models, and its dependence on diminished function of non-classical estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha [47], may suggest the marmoset as a particularly appropriate preclinical model. Of relevance is the marmoset’s naturally diminished signaling via ER-alpha due to intracellular inhibitory binding proteins for both ER-alpha and estrogen response elements on DNA [48]. Each provides clear potential by which manipulation of ER signaling may provide understanding of functional mechanism that is not possible in Old World monkeys.
Marmosets as model of infectious disease
The possibility to use marmosets as a model for human infectious disease has been extensively explored [3]. However, in the preclinical research of major infectious diseases, such as AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, Old World monkeys have been the preferred species. For some infections, though, including hepatitis C, the marmoset seems to be the only easily accessible model [49].
Understanding marmoset reproductive biology yields novel models for human health
Laboratory marmosets are usually bred when housed as a male-female pair or in families or groups of unrelated animals with a breeding dominant male and female [50,51]. Behavioral and physiological mechanisms otherwise prevent reproduction, constraining females to a greater degree than males [52]. Accommodating such reproductive traits in the laboratory has truly enabled biomedical use of marmosets in translational research. Recent examples include integrating microPET brain imaging and brain region-specific gene array studies with reproductive behavioral and neuroendocrine testing to unravel female sexual dysfunction [51a], as well as transgenic marmoset offspring [14] that promise genetically manipulated monkeys and more reliable translation to therapeutics in humans than mouse genetic models.
Common marmosets were the first monkeys from which primate embryonic stem (ES) cells [53] were derived, enabling the first derivation of ES cells from humans [54]. This stem cell heritage provided the needed foundation for inducible pluripotent stem cells that can be reliably manipulated into expressing specific phenotypic characteristics [55,56] and promise autologous stem cell therapies for replacement organs and tissues for humans.
Development of transgenic marmosets and marmoset stem cells has benefitted from recent revelations concerning marmoset reproductive physiology and a key difference to Old World primates, including humans. In marmosets, chorionic gonadotropin (CG) in addition to placental expression and maintenance of pregnancy [48], is also expressed by pituitary gonadotropins [59,60]. Episodic release of CG from the marmoset pituitary regulates ovarian follicle growth, triggers ovulation and supports corpus luteum function in females [59], and in males regulates testicular testosterone production in support of spermatogenesis [61]. In Old World primates and humans, however, pituitary luteinizing hormone (LH) supports ovarian and testicular function, while CG expression is relegated to the placenta for pregnancy recognition [48]. Understanding this reproductive difference was key to refining gonadotropin-stimulated oocyte retrieval [57,58], 58a] that unlocked progression towards multiple transgenic disease-related phenotypes [14].
Concluding remarks
The common marmoset is a small-bodied, multi-purpose nonhuman model that can be used to study many aspects of human biology and disease. Attractive aspects of marmosets for drug development are i) small size, requiring small amounts of test compound for preclinical toxicology and efficacy studies in one species, and ii) chimeric twinning enabling matched-control studies and efficient production of transgenic individuals.
References
- 1.Doxiadis GG et al. (2000) Unprecedented polymorphism of Mhc-DRB region configurations in rhesus macaques. J Immunol 164 (6), 3193–3199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abbott DH et al. (2003) Aspects of common marmoset basic biology and life history important for biomedical research. Comp Med 53 (4), 339–350 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mansfield K (2003) Marmoset models commonly used in biomedical research. Comp Med 53 (4), 383–392 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tardif SD et al. (2011) The marmoset as a model of aging and age-related diseases. Ilar J 52 (1), 54–65 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Layne DG and Power RA (2003) Husbandry, handling, and nutrition for marmosets. Comp Med 53 (4), 351–359 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rensing R and Oerke A (2005) Husbandry and Management of New World Species: Marmosets and Tamarins In The Laboratory Primate (Wolfe-Coote SP, ed.), pp. 145–160, Elsevier Science [Google Scholar]
- 6a.Tardif S, Bales K, Williams L, Moeller EL, Abbott D, Schultz-Darken N, Mendoza S, Mason W, Bourgeois S, Ruiz J.Preparing New World monkeys for laboratory research. ILAR J. 2006;47(4):307–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Buchanan-Smith HM (2010) Environmental enrichment for primates in laboratories. Adv Sci Res 5, 41–56 [Google Scholar]
- 8.‘t Hart BA et al. (2005) Chronic Diseases In The Laboratory Primate (Wolfe-Coote SP, ed.), pp. 417–433, Elsevier Science [Google Scholar]
- 9.Niblack GD et al. (1977) T-and B-lymphocyte chimerism in the marmoset. Immunology 32 (2), 257–263 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaspareit J et al. (2006) Background pathology of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) in toxicological studies. Exp Toxicol Pathol 57 (5-6), 405–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Orsi A et al. (2011) Overview of the marmoset as a model in nonclinical development of pharmaceutical products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 59 (1), 19–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Smith D et al. (2001) The selection of marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) in pharmaceutical toxicology. Lab Anim 35 (2), 117–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Datson NA et al. (2007) Development of the first marmoset-specific DNA microarray (EUMAMA): a new genetic tool for large-scale expression profiling in a non-human primate. BMC Genomics 8, 190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sasaki E et al. (2009) Generation of transgenic non-human primates with germline transmission. Nature 459 (7246), 523–527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sachs DH (2003) Tolerance: Of mice and men. J Clin Invest 111 (12), 1819–1821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.‘t Hart BA and Massacesi L (2009) Clinical, Pathological, and Immunologic Aspects of the Multiple Sclerosis Model in Common Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 68 (4), 341–355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zuhlke U and Weinbauer G (2003) The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) as a model in toxicology. Toxicol Pathol 31 Suppl, 123–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vierboom MP et al. (2010) Collagen-induced arthritis in common marmosets: a new nonhuman primate model for chronic arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 12 (5), R200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.‘t Hart BA et al. (2006) MRI-guided immunotherapy development for multiple sclerosis in a primate. Drug Discov Today 11 (1-2), 58–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Seehase S et al. (2011) Bronchoconstriction in nonhuman primates: a species comparison. J Appl Physiol 111 (3), 791–798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.‘t Hart BA et al. (2011) EAE: imperfect but useful models of multiple sclerosis. Trends Mol Med 17 (3), 119–125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stephan H et al. (1980) The brain of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). A stereotactic atlas, Berlin: Springer Verlag [Google Scholar]
- 23.Palazzi X and Bordier N (2008) The marmoset brain in stereotactic coordinates, Springer [Google Scholar]
- 23a.Converse AC, Aubert Y, Farhoud M, Weichert JP, Rowland IJ, Ingrisano NM, Allers KA, Sommer B, Abbott DH. 2012. Positron emission tomography assessment of 8-OH-DPAT-mediated changes in an index of cerebral glucose metabolism in female marmosets. NeuroImage 60:447–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Annett LE et al. (1992) Behavioural analysis of unilateral monoamine depletion in the marmoset. Brain 115 ( Pt 3), 825–856 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eslamboli A (2005) Marmoset monkey models of Parkinson’s disease: which model, when and why? Brain Res Bull 68 (3), 140–149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Philippens IH et al. (2010) The MPTP marmoset model of Parkinsonism: a multi-purpose non-human primate model for neurodegenerative diseases. Drug Discov Today 15 (23-24), 985–990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Geula C et al. (1998) Aging renders the brain vulnerable to amyloid beta-protein neurotoxicity. Nat Med 4 (7), 827–831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kirik D et al. (2003) Nigrostriatal alpha-synucleinopathy induced by viral vector-mediated overexpression of human alpha-synuclein: a new primate model of Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100 (5), 2884–2889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Geula C et al. (2002) Amyloid-beta deposits in the cerebral cortex of the aged common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): incidence and chemical composition. Acta Neuropathol 103 (1), 48–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saji H et al. (2003) In vivo imaging of brain dopaminergic neurotransmission system in small animals with high-resolution single photon emission computed tomography. Anal Sci 19 (1), 67–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.‘t Hart BA et al. (2004) Non-invasive measurement of brain damage in a primate model of multiple sclerosis. Trends Mol. Med 10 (2), 85–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ferris CF et al. (2004) Activation of neural pathways associated with sexual arousal in non-human primates. J Magn Reson Imaging 19 (2), 168–175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Crofts HS et al. (1999) Home cage presentation of complex discrimination tasks to marmosets and rhesus monkeys. Lab Anim 33 (3), 207–214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schnell CR and Wood JM (1993) Measurement of blood pressure and heart rate by telemetry in conscious, unrestrained marmosets. Am J Physiol 264 (5 Pt 2), H1509–1516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pearce PC et al. (1998) Concurrent monitoring of EEG and performance in the common marmoset: a methodological approach. Physiol Behav 63 (4), 591–599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Takemoto A et al. (2011) Development of a compact and general-purpose experimental apparatus with a touch-sensitive screen for use in evaluating cognitive functions in common marmosets. J Neurosci Methods 199 (1), 82–86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Crofts HS et al. (2001) Investigation of the sleep electrocorticogram of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) using radiotelemetry. Clin Neurophysiol 112 (12), 2265–2273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tardif SD et al. (2009) Characterization of obese phenotypes in a small nonhuman primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Obesity (Silver Spring) 17 (8), 1499–1505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dhurandhar NV et al. (2002) Human adenovirus Ad-36 promotes weight gain in male rhesus and marmoset monkeys. J Nutr 132 (10), 3155–3160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nyirenda MJ et al. (2009) Prenatal programming of metabolic syndrome in the common marmoset is associated with increased expression of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. Diabetes 58 (12), 2873–2879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wachtman LM et al. (2011) Differential contribution of dietary fat and monosaccharide to metabolic syndrome in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Obesity (Silver Spring) 19 (6), 1145–1156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klimentidis YC et al. (2011) Canaries in the coal mine: a cross-species analysis of the plurality of obesity epidemics. Proc Biol Sci 278 (1712), 1626–1632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Seino S et al. (1987) Sequence of a New World primate insulin having low biological potency and immunoreactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84 (21), 7423–7427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wallis M (2009) New insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-precursor sequences from mammalian genomes: the molecular evolution of IGFs and associated peptides in primates. Growth Horm IGF Res 19 (1), 12–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mohanasundaram D et al. (2011) Ultrastructural analysis, zinc transporters, glucose transporters and hormones expression in new world primate (Callithrix jacchus) and human pancreatic islets. Gen Comp Endocrinol [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kramer J et al. (2009) Differential expression of GLUT2 in pancreatic islets and kidneys of New and Old World nonhuman primates. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296 (3), R786–793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Park CJ et al. (2011) Genetic rescue of nonclassical ERalpha signaling normalizes energy balance in obese Eralpha-null mutant mice. J Clin Invest 121 (2), 604–612 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Adams C et al. (2011) A novel two promoter- one gene system of the Chorionic Gonadotropin Beta (CGB) gene enables tissue specific expression. J Mol Endocrinol [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bright H et al. (2004) Development of a GB virus B marmoset model and its validation with a novel series of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease inhibitors. J Virol 78 (4), 2062–2071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Abbott DH et al. (1997) Specific neuroendocrine mechanisms not involving generalized stress mediate social regulation of female reproduction in cooperatively breeding marmoset monkeys. Ann N Y Acad Sci 807, 219–238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saltzman W et al. (1997) Escape from social suppression of sexual behavior and of ovulation in female common marmosets. Ann N Y Acad Sci 807, 567–570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51a.Converse AK, Aubert Y, Farhoud M, Weichert JP, Rowland IJ, Ingrisano NM, Allers KA, Sommer B, Abbott DH. (2012) Positron emission tomography assessment of 8-OH-DPAT-mediated changes in an index of cerebral glucose metabolism in female marmosets. Neuroimage 60, 447–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Abbott DH (1993) Social conflict and reproductive suppression in marmoset and tamarin monkeys In Primate Social Conflict. (Mason WA and Mendosa SP, eds.), pp. 331–372, State University of New York Press [Google Scholar]
- 52a.Barnett DK, Bunnell TM, Millar RP and Abbott DH. 2006. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone II stimulates female sexual behavior in marmoset monkeys. Endocrinology 147:615–623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52b.Aubert Y, Gustison ML, Gardner LA, Bohl MA, Lange JR, Allers KA, Sommer B, Datson NA, Abbott DH. 2012. Flibanserin and 8-OH-DPAT implicate serotonin in association between female marmoset monkey sexual behavior and changes in pair-bond quality. J Sex Med. 9:694–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Thomson JA et al. (1996) Pluripotent cell lines derived from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. Biol Reprod 55 (2), 254–259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Thomson JA et al. (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282 (5391), 1145–1147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tomioka I et al. (2010) Generating induced pluripotent stem cells from common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) fetal liver cells using defined factors, including Lin28. Genes Cells 15 (9), 959–969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wu Y et al. (2010) Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from newborn marmoset skin fibroblasts. Stem Cell Res 4 (3), 180–188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Marshall VS et al. (2003) Ovarian stimulation of marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) using recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone. J Med Primatol 32 (1), 57–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Grupen CG et al. (2007) Effects of ovarian stimulation, with and without human chorionic gonadotrophin, on oocyte meiotic and developmental competence in the marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Theriogenology 68 (6), 861–872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58a.Hanazawa K, Mueller T, Becker T, Heistermann M, Behr R, Sasaki E. Minimally invasive transabdominal collection of preimplantation embryos from the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus). Theriogenology. 2012. May 11. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Henke A et al. (2007) Chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit gene expression in the marmoset pituitary is controlled by steroidogenic factor 1, early growth response protein 1, and pituitary homeobox factor 1. Endocrinology 148 (12), 6062–6072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Muller T et al. (2004) Chorionic gonadotrophin beta subunit mRNA but not luteinising hormone beta subunit mRNA is expressed in the pituitary of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). J Mol Endocrinol 32 (1), 115–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tannenbaum PL et al. (2007) Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release in marmosets I: in vivo measurement in ovary-intact and ovariectomised females. J Neuroendocrinol 19 (5), 342–353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Spinelli S, Pennanen L, Dettling AC, Feldon J, Higgins GA, Pryce CR.: Performance of the marmoset monkey on computerized tasks of attention and working memory. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 19 (2):123–137, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hauser J, Knapman A, Zürcher NR, Pilloud S, Maier C, Diaz-Heijtz R, Forssberg H, Dettling A, Feldon J, Pryce CR.Effects of prenatal dexamethasone treatment on physical growth, pituitary-adrenal hormones, and performance of motor, motivational, and cognitive tasks in juvenile and adolescent common marmoset monkeys. Endocrinology, 149(12):6343–6355, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


