Skip to main content
Annals of Work Exposures and Health logoLink to Annals of Work Exposures and Health
. 2017 Feb 21;61(3):369–382. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx003

The Effects of Trivialization of Workplace Violence on Its Victims: Profession and Sex Differences in a Cross-Sectional Study among Healthcare and Law Enforcement Workers

Steve Geoffrion 1,*,, Jane Goncalves 2, Richard Boyer 2, André Marchand 2,3, Stéphane Guay 4
PMCID: PMC6824521  PMID: 28355455

Abstract

Background:

Workers from the law enforcement and healthcare sectors tend to normalize or mute their victimization from workplace violence (WPV).

Objectives:

This study aims to assess the impact of the trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences for workers who have been affected by a WPV incident. The second aim is to assess the moderating effect of sex on the trivialization of WPV. The third and overarching aim is to assess the moderating effect of professional identity on the relations between individual and organizational factors and psychological consequences following a WPV incident.

Methods:

The findings are based on a convenience sample of 377 (204 female and 173 male) workers from the law enforcement and healthcare sectors. Individual factors (sex, age, professional identity, prior victimization, witnessing WPV, injuries, and trivialization of violence) and perceived support factors (colleagues’ support and employer’s support) were used as predictor variables of psychological consequences in hierarchical linear regression models. Sex was used as a moderator of trivialization while professional identity was used as a moderator of all predictors.

Findings:

When individual and social support factors were controlled for, normalizing violence was negatively associated with psychological consequences while perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV was positively associated for all participants. When these relations were moderated by the sex of the participants and then by their professional identity, normalization was found to decrease psychological consequences only for male healthcare workers.

Implications:

To help employees cope with WPV, organizations should promote strategies adapted to profession and sex differences. For male healthcare workers, normalization as a cognitive coping strategy should be formally recognized. For both professions and sexes, organizational strategies that counter the perceived taboo of complaining about violence should be reinforced.

Keywords: healthcare workers, law enforcers, profession differences, professional identity, psychological consequences, sex differences, trivialization, workplace violence

Introduction

Workers in the healthcare and law enforcement sectors are among those most prone to experiencing workplace violence (WPV; Piquero et al., 2013), which refers to any aggressive behavior that threatens the safety and well-being of the worker (Nijman et al., 1997). WPV have been associated with negative outcomes such as burnout, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, poor service delivery, absenteeism, and turnover (He et al., 2002; Jackson et al., 2002; Aquino and Thau, 2009; Chapman et al., 2009; Pich et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2011). Nevertheless, healthcare and law enforcement workers tend to trivialize their exposure to all types of WPV (Erickson and Williams-Evans, 2000; Macdonald and Sirotich, 2001; Åkerström, 2002; Dyrkacz et al., 2012). Trivializing WPV consists of perceiving violence as normal or perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about it (Geoffrion et al., 2015). Normalization refers to the belief that aggression from the clientele is ‘part of the job’ while perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV implies that workers mute their discomfort with WPV because they think that such behavior would lead to negative peer judgment (i.e. being stigmatized as ‘incompetent’ or ‘unfit’ for the job; Dick, 2000; Macdonald and Sirotich, 2001; Åkerström, 2002; Geoffrion et al., 2015).

Many individual and organizational factors have been associated with psychological consequences following victimization (Chappell and Di Martino, 2006). However, the influence of the trivialization of WPV on the psychological well-being of workers remains unexamined. The focus of the current study was to assess the relation between the trivialization of WPV and psychological consequences related to PTSD experienced by healthcare and law enforcement workers who were victims and affected by a WPV incident. The current study also assessed the relation between individual and social support factors and psychological consequences related to PTSD. A review of the individual and social support factors under study and their impact on psychological consequences following victimization is presented in order to frame the role of the trivialization of WPV in this explicative model.

Factors Associated with Psychological Consequences Resulting from WPV Among Healthcare Workers and Law Enforcers

Sex of the worker

Tolin and Foa’s (2006) meta-analysis revealed that women were more likely than men to meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD after experiencing a potentially traumatic situation such as a violent act. Some studies specific to law officials demonstrated the same patterns of results (Ménard and Arter, 2014; Cone et al., 2015), while others reported no sex differences in rates of PTSD (Santos et al., 2009; Ballenger et al., 2010). Research with healthcare workers reported no sex differences in PTSD symptomatology following a WPV incident (Fitzpatrick and Wilson, 1999).

Profession

There is general consensus that healthcare workers and law officials are highly stressful occupations particularly due to the threat of physical or psychological injuries (Lanctôt and Guay, 2014; Dang et al., 2016). WPV can trigger numerous and diverse emotional and cognitive consequences. Responses such as anger, cognitive distraction, burnout, anxiety, depression, stress, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder are commonly found in the literature among healthcare workers (Gates et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2011; Lanctôt and Guay, 2014) and law officials (Cone et al., 2015; Green, 2016).

History of victimization

Studies have shown that exposure to WPV varies considerably across the two aforementioned sectors. For instance, Piquero et al. (2013) demonstrated that between 7 and 83% of healthcare workers were victims of violent acts, while Fleischmann et al. (2016) reported that 74.5% of police officers experienced traumatic events such as WPV. Past exposure to WPV, as a direct victim or witness, also has an impact on psychological consequences following a WPV incident. Several studies have revealed an association between past exposure to WPV and psychological consequences, namely PTSD symptoms (Arnetz and Arnetz, 2001; Whittington, 2002; AbuAlRub and Al-Asmar, 2011; Gates et al., 2011; Demir and Rodwell, 2012). In a nursing study, Lam (2002) found that high exposure to physical and verbal WPV more than doubles the odds of psychological distress, as compared to nurses who were less exposed. Martin et al. (2009) conducted interviews using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I; First et al., 1996) among a sample of 132 Canadian police officers who experienced work-related traumatic events, which include WPV. Their results indicated that, following these events, 7.6% of the participants developed full PTSD, whereas 6.8% had partial PTSD.

Physical injury

WPV resulting in injury may lead to the development of PTSD (Gabert-Quillen et al., 2011). A study conducted among a representative sample of 2931 injured trauma survivors who were hospitalized after their injury showed that 23% of injury survivors had symptoms consistent with PTSD 12 months after their hospitalization (Zatzick et al., 2007). However, results concerning the impact of injury severity on PTSD are more conflicted (Gabert-Quillen et al., 2011): some studies conclude that no relationship exists between injury severity and PTSD (Zatzick et al., 2002), while others support a positive relationship (Jeavons, 2000) or a negative relationship (Delahanty et al., 2003). The number of injuries was found to be one of the strongest predictors of PTSD among responders (i.e. police, firefighters) after the 9/11 (Liu et al., 2014), while the site of injury on the body was associated with greater PTSD symptoms scores for healthcare workers (Walsht and Clarke, 2003).

Social support

At an interpersonal level, peer support has proven its efficacy in helping workers cope with the psychological impact associated with WPV. He et al. (2002) found that camaraderie dampens the impact of work-related stressors, including WPV, on male police officers. More broadly, Brown et al. (1999) showed that social support (including from colleagues and supervisors) decreased the likelihood of psychological distress for both male and female law enforcers. Utilizing a sample of 176 police officers, De Terte et al. (2014) revealed that greater social support from colleagues was related to fewer PTSD symptoms, less psychological distress, and better physical health. In a review on risk factors and protective strategies in healthcare settings, Gillespie et al. (2013) identified social support as a factor that ‘reduces the negative physical and psychological symptoms and negative attitude toward work following violent events’ (p. 179).

Trivialization of WPV and Psychological Consequences

Trivialization of WPV can be understood through the theoretical framework of professional identity, which refers to a system of meanings and values associated with the worker’s roles (Skorikov and Vondracek, 2011). Professional identity influences the perceptions and attitudes of workers toward WPV (Geoffrion et al., 2015). Dick (2000) and Åkerström (2002) argued that the nature of the job and its professional culture construct the worker’s identity and influence his perceptions of himself, his work environment, and the work-related situations he encounters.

Nurses often consider WPV as an unavoidable aspect of the profession (Erickson and Williams-Evans, 2000; Rippon, 2000; Åkerström, 2002; Menzel et al., 2004; Nachreiner et al., 2007). Therefore, healthcare workers tend to downplay violence from the patients in order to preserve their identity as caregivers, which allows them to maintain a caring relationship (Åkerström, 2002). Complaining about violence is also depicted as contrary to the nature of healthcare professions (Jones and Lyneham, 2001). For example, based on the nature of their role, nurses are expected to deal with conflict (Trossman, 2006). Thus, complaining about violent conflicts goes against expected roles and attitudes. WPV has been so trivialized in the healthcare sector that it has been integrated in its culture (Rippon, 2000; Åkerström, 2002; Menzel et al., 2004).

For law enforcers, policing identity operates at a collective level to ‘normalize’ some emotional responses and ‘pathologize’ others that are contrary to the police organizational culture (Dick, 2000). WPV is considered to be part of the routine and curriculum of the job (Brown et al., 1999; Dick, 2000). Geoffrion et al. (2015) found within a sample of 1141 workers that law enforcers were more likely than healthcare workers to perceive a taboo associated with complaining about WPV. Graef (1990) also argued that police culture promotes so-called masculine values, such as being able to manage potentially violent situations. Consequently, studies have demonstrated that law enforcers tend to inhibit their emotional reactions to violence (Brown et al., 1999; Dick, 2000). According to a study of New Zealand police officers, this inhibition of emotional expression is associated with psychological distress (Stephens et al., 1997). However, Brown et al. (1999) tested the same association within their sample of British police officers but did not find any significant relationship between this coping strategy and psychological distress. Nevertheless, these findings highlight the close relationship between perceptions of WPV and psychological well-being as well as the moderating effect of professional identity on these relations. Still, more studies are needed to understand these associations and, more precisely, to assess the effect of trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences following victimization.

Sex-differentiated perceptions

Studies on stress and sex have also shown that men and women differently perceive, experience, report, and cope with WPV (Barnett et al., 1987; He et al., 2002; Wells et al., 2006; Johnson et al., 2007). Johnson et al. (2007) argued that sex can directly affect behaviors and perceptions, as men and women are ascribed different roles, responsibilities, and activities. Differing perceptions of potentially stressful situations such as WPV may thus alter the level of stress experienced by the worker (Thoits, 1999; Åkerström, 2002). A previous study (Geoffrion et al., 2015) found that sex was a significant individual predictor of normalization. Men from the present sample were more likely than women to think that WPV is ‘part of the job’. These analyses also revealed important distinctions between male and female workers regarding the taboo of complaining about WPV among healthcare workers and law enforcers. Female law enforcers were twice as likely to perceive a taboo associated with complaining about WPV compared to women working in healthcare. Thus, the effects of the trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences related to PTSD experienced by healthcare and law enforcement workers who were victims of a WPV incident could also be moderated by the sex of the worker. This emphasizes the need to differentiate the effects of trivialization according to profession and sex since support provided to workers should be adapted to the professional identity, needs, and coping strategies of individuals.

Aims of the study

Knowledge about the effects of the trivialization of WPV on the psychological consequences of its victims is very scarce. Thus, studies are needed to better understand the impact of the trivialization of WPV on psychological well-being in order to help workers better cope with this phenomenon. The first objective of the present study is to assess the effect of the trivialization of WPV on the psychological consequences of healthcare and law enforcement workers who were victims and affected by a WPV incident. More specifically, the impact of normalizing and perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV on psychological well-being is evaluated in a multivariate model including individual and social support factors. A second aim is to assess the moderating effect of sex in the relation between the trivialization of WPV and psychological consequences. A third and overarching aim is to assess the moderating effect of professional identity on the relations between individual and organizational factors and psychological consequences following a WPV incident. This study will simultaneously contribute to the advancement of scientific knowledge on WPV while informing organizations on appropriate and tailored interventions to minimize psychological consequences associated with WPV.

Method

Participants

The current cross-sectional study relied on a convenience sample in the province of Quebec, Canada. A total of 2889 workers from seven categories of employment responded to the survey: law officials, healthcare professionals, nursing staff, managers, administrative workers, skilled and service industry workers, and public transportation workers. We only selected law enforcement and healthcare workers who reported to be affected by a WPV incident in the past 12 months. As a result, we obtained a sample of 377 workers of which 54.1% were women and 70.6% were healthcare workers. Security agents (29.7%), park rangers (14.4%), and police officers (55.9%) constitute the law enforcers group. Orderlies (12.5%), nurses (61.9%), and healthcare professionals (25.6%) represent the healthcare providers group.

Sampling procedure

The study was conducted among French-speaking workers who were recruited by three organizations linked to the Agency for Health and Safety at Work. All workers supported by these agencies were eligible to participate. Between January 2011 and October 2012, workers were reached by email or on-site to complete a survey online or on paper. Advertisement and questionnaires were distributed by the Agency. The total number of solicited workers was not available (i.e. number of emails sent not calculated). All the workers were informed of the purpose of the study as well as the anonymous nature of their answers. A majority of the participants completed the survey online (74.2%) versus on paper (25.8%). All questionnaires were answered anonymously and on a voluntary basis. This study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal.

Measures

Questions within the survey were related to episodes of WPV that the respondents might have experienced during the past 12 months and their repercussions. The survey also examined workers’ perceptions with regard to WPV, social support received at work to cope with this reality, and the psychological consequences engendered by their WPV victimization.

Predictors: individual factors

Exposure to WPV

A distinction was made between two types of exposure to WPV: being a direct victim or being a witness. Respondents were asked to report on a scale from ‘0 to 10 and more’ how many times they have been a direct victim of or a witness to nine different types of WPV: verbal aggression, destructive behaviors, threats, death threats, assaults, robbery with violence, armed robbery, sexual contact, and sexual aggression. These categories were not mutually exclusive; respondents may have been both victims and witnesses.

Two variables were created in order to measure the level of exposure to violence. First, frequency of direct victim sums up direct victimization events of each type of violent act including the ‘other’ category experienced in the 12 past months in the workplace. Second, frequency of violent act witnessed sums up the number of times a worker has been a witness of each type of violent act during the 12-month reference period.

Physical injuries resulting from WPV victimization

Respondents selected one of three options: (i) no injury, (ii) injury that required medical examination but no hospitalization, and (iii) injury that led to hospitalization. For analyses, two binary variables were created: injury without hospitalization and injury with hospitalization. No injury was used as the reference category for both variables.

Sociodemographics

Three sociodemographic characteristics were included in the present study. Participants had to indicate their sex (women = 0, men = 1), their age (five categories were created: 1 = 15–25, 2 = 26–35, 3 = 36–45, 4 = 46–55, 5 = 56 to +), as well as their profession. The inclusion of this last variable in our multivariate model allows for the examination of differences based on professional identity.

Predictors: social support in the workplace

Two different items from the questionnaire explored workers’ perceptions toward social support available in the workplace. On a 4-point Likert-scale ranging from ‘not at all (0)’ to ‘completely (3)’, respondents had to declare the extent to which the following features were ‘present’ in their work environment: (i) ‘to what extent do you benefit from colleagues’ support in your workplace’ (i.e. colleagues’ support) and (ii) ‘to what extent do you benefit from employer’s support in your workplace’ (i.e. employer’s support). For both variables, social support was general, not specific to WPV.

Predictors: trivialization of WPV

Three items from the survey were selected to represent two aspects of trivialization: normalization and taboo related to complaining about WPV. First, respondents were asked if they believed that ‘severe violence is normal in (their) workplace, it is part of the job’. On a 4-point Likert-scale, workers could answer ‘not at all, slightly, highly or completely’. Since our research question focused on whether participants trivialized WPV and not on the extent to which they trivialized it, we dichotomized this variable to measure normalization (0 = no, 1 = yes) of WPV; ‘not at all’ was coded ‘no’ while all other responses were coded ‘yes’. Second, respondents were asked on the same 4-point Likert-scale if they thought (i) ‘(they) would be judged by their colleagues if they complained about severe violence in (their) workplace’ and (ii) ‘(they) would be judged by their employer if they complained about severe violence in (their) workplace’. These two items were computed, generating a scale with good internal consistency (α = 0.81) according to George and Mallery (2003) (α > 0.80 is good internal consistency). Following the same rationale as the normalization variable, we dichotomized this variable (0 = no, 1 = yes).

Outcome variable: psychological consequences

Participants were asked if they experienced any psychological consequences following the WPV incident that has affected them in the past 12 months. A scale of post-traumatic stress reactions was created based on the DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) PTSD symptoms. Respondents had to report the presence (yes/no) of 10 symptoms: flashbacks, nightmares related to the event, avoiding elements that arouse recollection of the event, guilt, irritability, loss of interest in pleasurable or important activities, sleep problems, hypervigilance, concentration problems, or other psychological symptoms. The total number of experienced symptoms was calculated. The psychological consequences variable represents the sum of these 10 categories. This item, ranging from 0 to 10, was positively skewed. The scale was found to have good internal consistency (α = 0.88).

Analyses

First, chi-square (χ2) and t-tests were used to make profession comparisons on predictors and outcome variables. χ2 tests and t-tests were also run to compare trivialization and psychological consequences variables between man and women among healthcare workers and law enforcers (separate models). Subsequently, a hierarchical linear regression analysis model was used to answer the first objective. Individual factors were entered in a first model. Social support factors were introduced in a second model. Normalization and taboo related to complaining about WPV were entered in a third model. Consequently, it made it possible to consider the impact of adding social support and the trivialization variables on the explained variance of psychological consequences. To answer the second objective, interactions between sex and normalization as well as sex and perceiving a taboo related to complaining about WPV were added in a fourth model. It made it possible to examine whether the impact of the trivialization variables on psychological consequences was moderated by sex. Finally, to answer the third objective, all models were tested separately for healthcare workers and law enforcers. Post hoc comparison of regression estimates were performed to examine professional identity differences as suggested by Paternoster et al. (1998). IBM SPSS statistics 22 was utilized, and missing data were left as is in the analyses.

Results

Descriptive and bivariate results

Of the 377 workers who were victims and affected by a WPV incident in the past 12 months, 54.3% thought that violence was normal in their work environment while 57.8% believed that their colleagues or employer would judge them if they complained about WPV. These participants reported an average of 2.87 (SD = 2.75) types of psychological consequences after their exposure to a WPV incident that has affected them.

Table 1 depicts the descriptive results among healthcare workers and law enforcers separately. It also provides results of bivariate analyses performed to assess differences between these two types of workers. The majority of healthcare workers in the sample were women (65.8%), while the majority of law enforcers were men (73.9%; χ2 = 49.62, df = 1, P < 0.000, phi = 0.363). In addition, a greater proportion of law enforcers (68.5%) than healthcare workers (48.5%) defined violence as normal (χ2 = 12.93, df = 1, P < 0.000, phi = 0.183). Healthcare workers also tended to be older than law enforcers (3.2 versus 2.6 respectively; t = 5.09, df = 244,65, P < 0.000). Law enforcers were victims of more incidents of WPV in the previous 12 months than healthcare workers (15.6 versus 10.8; t = −3.78, df = 375, P < 0.000). Law enforcers also witnessed more incidents of WPV in the previous 12 months (24.6 versus 15.7; t = −4.38, df = 147, P < 0.000).

Table 1.

Sample descriptive results and professional identity differences.

Parameter Healthcare workers (n = 266) Law enforcers (n = 111)
n % n %
Sex of the worker***
 Woman (0) 175 65.8 29 26.1
 Man (1) 91 34.2 82 73.9
Injury without hospitalization
 No (0) 216 83.7 89 80.9
 Yes (1) 42 16.3 21 19.1
Injury with hospitalization
 No (0) 224 86.8 93 84.5
 Yes (1) 34 13.2 17 15.5
Normalization***
 No (0) 137 51.5 35 31.5
 Yes (1) 129 48.5 76 68.5
Perceived taboo of complaining about WPV
 No (0) 116 44.1 41 37.3
 Yes (1) 147 55.9 69 62.7
Mean SD Mean SD
Age*** 3.2 1.2 2.6 1.0
 15 to 25 (1)
 26 to 35 (2)
 36 to 45 (3)
 46 to 55 (4)
 56 to + (5)
Frequency of past victimization of WPV*** 10.8 11.0 15.6 12.0
Frequency of past witnessing of WPV*** 15.7 12.4 24.6 19.8
Colleagues’ support (0–3) 1.9 0.8 1.9 0.8
Employer’s support (0–3) 1.3 0.9 1.3 0.9
Psychological consequences (0–10) 2.9 2.6 2.8 3.1

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, resulting from χ2 tests (sex, injury without hospitalization, injury with hospitalization, normalization, perceived taboo of complaining about WPV) or t-tests (age, frequency of past victimization of WPV, frequency of past witnessing WPV, colleague’s support, employer’s support, psychological consequences).

Objective 1: trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences

Table 2 reports the results of the multiple hierarchical linear regression model conducted to assess the associations between predictors (related to individual factors, social support, and trivialization) and psychological consequences following a WPV incident. Models in this table were conducted among the total sample of the present study. In Model 1, being a man was negatively associated with the outcome variable. Age, prior victimization, and injury without hospitalization were positively related to the outcome variable. As shown in Model 2, the inclusion of social support variables increased the capacity to explain psychological consequences. While sex was no longer associated with the outcome variable, support from colleagues and the employer were negatively related to psychological consequences. In Model 3, the inclusion of normalization and perceived taboo associated with complaining about WPV also increased the capacity to explain psychological consequences. In this model, female participants experienced more psychological consequences than men. Workers who normalized WPV experienced fewer types of psychological consequences while those who perceived a taboo related to complaining about WPV experienced more psychological consequences.

Table 2.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting psychological consequences following a WPV incident.

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β
Sex −0.68 0.29 −0.12* −0.55 0.28 −0.10 −0.55 0.28 −0.10* 0.11 0.50 0.02
Age 0.44 0.12 0.19*** 0.36 0.12 0.15** 0.34 0.12 0.14** 0.31 0.12 0.13**
Profession 0.12 0.33 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.32 0.01 0.07 0.32 0.02
Victim. 0.08 0.02 0.34*** 0.07 0.02 0.29*** 0.07 0.02 0.28*** 0.07 0.02 0.28***
Witness −0.02 0.01 −0.11 −0.02 0.01 −0.09 −0.01 0.01 −0.08 −0.01 0.01 −0.07
Inj. without 0.33 0.36 0.05 0.25 0.35 0.04 0.14 0.35 0.02 0.11 0.35 0.02
Inj. with 2.31 0.40 0.29*** 2.14 0.38 0.27*** 2.00 0.38 0.25*** 2.01 0.38 0.25***
Coll. sup. −0.41 0.18 −0.12* −0.35 0.18 −0.11* −0.35 0.18 −0.11*
Emp. sup. −0.48 0.17 −0.15** −0.36 0.18 −0.12* −0.36 0.17 −0.12*
Normalization −0.53 0.26 −0.10* −0.01 0.35 −0.00
Taboo of complaining 0.80 0.28 0.14** 0.83 0.36 0.15*
Sex × normalization −1.17 0.51 −0.19*
Sex × taboo −0.01 0.52 −0.03
Adjusted R2 0.18 0.23 0.25 0.25
F for change in R2 12.02*** 12.69*** 5.70*** 2.62

N = 359 for all models. ‘Victim.’ refers to ‘past victimization’; ‘inj. without’ refers to ‘Injury without hospitalization’; ‘inj. with’ refers to ‘injury with hospitalization’; ‘coll. sup.’ refers to ‘colleagues support’; ‘emp. sup’ refers to ‘employer support’; ‘sex × taboo’ refers to the interaction between sex and taboo of complaining.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Objective 2: moderating effects of sex on the relation between trivialization of WPV and psychological consequences

The fourth model of Table 2 introduced the interaction between sex and the normalization of violence as well as sex and perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV. The difference in explained variance with Model 3 was not statistically significant. However, of the two interactions, sex was found to only moderate the relation between normalization and psychological consequences. In this case, men who normalized violence had fewer types of psychological consequences after their WPV victimization. This reveals that the effect of normalizing violence that appeared in the Model 3 is only significant for male participants.

Objective 3: moderating effects of profession on the relation between individual, social support, and trivialization factors on psychological consequences

Table 3 depicts the results of multiple hierarchical regression model performed only with healthcare workers, while Table 4 shows the results for law enforcers. Post hoc comparisons of the regression estimates of the fourth model for both job-specific models were completed to determine whether differences in main effects between healthcare workers and law enforcers were statistically significant. Only age was found to statistically differ according to professional identity (beta = 0.17, SE = 0.13 for healthcare workers; beta = 0.86, SE = 0.26 for law enforcers; corrected z = 2.35, P = 0.009). Specifically, age appeared as a significant predictor of psychological consequences for law enforcers, but not for healthcare workers. However, other factors marginally differed between healthcare workers and law enforcers. Prior victimization was only significant for healthcare workers (beta = 0.08, SE = 0.02 for healthcare workers; beta = 0.02, SE = 0.03 for law enforcers; corrected z = 1.96, P = 0.050). Injury with hospitalization had a greater impact for law enforcers (beta = −0.03, SE = 0.39 for healthcare workers; beta = 0.81, SE = 0.67 for law enforcers; corrected z = 1.08, P = 0.072). The moderation of sex on normalization was only significant for healthcare workers (beta = −1.81, SE = 0.61 for healthcare workers; beta = 0.99, SE = 1.32 for law enforcers; corrected z = 1.92, P = 0.055). In sum, these analyses reveal that the effect of age, prior victimization, and the moderating effect of sex on normalization that appeared in Table 2 were job-specific while injury with hospitalization was more salient for law enforcers.

Table 3.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting psychological consequences following a WPV incident among healthcare workers.

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β
Sex −0.52 0.32 −0.09 −0.46 0.31 −0.08 −0.50 0.31 −0.09 0.55 0.56 0.10
Age 0.27 0.13 0.12* 0.21 0.13 0.10 0.21 0.13 0.10 0.17 0.13 0.08
Victim. 0.10 0.02 0.42*** 0.09 0.02 0.39*** 0.09 0.02 0.37*** 0.08 0.02 0.35***
Witness −0.01 0.02 −0.05 −0.01 0.02 −0.05 −0.01 0.02 −0.03 −0.00 0.02 −0.01
Inj. without 0.15 0.40 0.02 0.11 0.40 0.02 0.00 0.40 0.00 −0.03 0.39 −0.00
Inj. with 2.01 0.45 0.26*** 1.85 0.45 0.24*** 1.64 0.45 0.21*** 1.77 0.44 0.22***
Coll. sup. −0.37 0.20 −0.12 −0.31 0.20 −0.10 −0.29 0.20 −0.09
Emp. sup. −0.24 0.19 −0.08 −0.12 0.20 −0.04 −0.12 0.19 −0.04
Normalization −0.43 0.29 −0.08 0.18 0.35 0.04
Taboo of complaining 0.78 0.32 0.15* 0.89 0.37 0.17*
Sex × normalization −1.81 0.61 −0.27**
Sex × taboo −0.21 0.62 −0.03
Adjusted R2 0.21 0.23 0.24 0.27
F for change in R2 11.59*** 4.41* 3.86* 4.61*

N = 250 for all models. ‘Victim.’ refers to ‘past victimization’; ‘inj. without’ refers to ‘Injury without hospitalization’; ‘inj. with’ refers to ‘injury with hospitalization’; ‘coll. sup.’ refers to ‘colleagues support’; ‘emp. sup’ refers to ‘employer support’; ‘sex × taboo’ refers to the interaction between sex and taboo of complaining.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Table 4.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting psychological consequences following a WPV incident among law enforcers.

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β B SE B β
Sex −0.88 0.61 −0.13 −0.33 0.58 −0.05 −0.21 0.58 −0.03 0.27 1.55 0.04
Age 1.04 0.27 0.33*** 0.93 0.26 0.30*** 0.83 0.26 0.26** 0.86 0.26 0.27**
Victim. 0.03 0.03 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.06
Witness −0.02 0.02 −0.14 −0.02 0.02 −0.10 −0.01 0.02 −0.08 −0.02 0.02 −0.10
Inj. without 1.07 0.72 0.14 0.92 0.67 0.12 0.78 0.67 0.10 0.81 0.67 0.10
Inj. with 3.18 0.76 0.38*** 3.08 0.71 0.37*** 3.13 0.70 0.37*** 3.30 0.73 0.39***
Coll. sup. −0.46 0.36 −0.12 −0.47 0.36 −0.13 −0.47 0.36 −0.13
Emp. sup. −0.95 0.35 −0.26** −0.80 0.36 −0.22* −0.78 0.36 −0.22*
Normalization −0.65 0.56 −0.10 −1.30 1.19 −1.19
Taboo of complaining 0.89 0.54 0.14 2.16 1.90 0.34
Sex × normalization 0.99 1.32 0.16
Sex × taboo −1.63 1.34 −0.26
Adjusted R2 0.23 0.38 0.41 0.42
F for change in R2 6.39*** 9.00*** 1.81 1.10

N = 109 for all models. ‘Victim.’ refers to ‘past victimization’; ‘inj. without’ refers to ‘injury without hospitalization’; ‘inj. with’ refers to ‘injury with hospitalization’; ‘coll. sup.’ refers to ‘colleagues support’; ‘emp. sup’ refers to ‘employer support’; ‘sex × taboo’ refers to the interaction between sex and taboo of complaining.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Discussion

Using a victimization survey regarding the perceptions of 377 healthcare and law enforcement workers, the global objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of the trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences following a WPV incident according to the profession and the sex of the participants. When individual and social support factors were controlled for, normalizing violence was negatively associated with psychological consequences while perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV was positively associated for all participants. When these relations were moderated by the sex of the participants and then by their professional identity, normalization was found to decrease psychological consequences only for male healthcare workers. This cross-sectional study also revealed individual and social support factors associated with psychological consequences following a WPV incident. These results are discussed further in regards to differences among healthcare workers and law enforcers within a professional identity theoretical framework.

Impact of individual factors on psychological consequences

Contrasting with some studies within law enforcement and healthcare settings that reported no sex differences in PTSD symptomatology after WPV (Fitzpatrick and Wilson, 1999; Armstrong and Griffin, 2004; Lilly et al., 2009; Santos et al., 2009), female participants experienced more PTSD symptoms following a WPV incident than their male counterparts, regardless of their profession. These results are however consistent with the literature on PTSD that has shown that women are more likely than men to develop psychological consequences after being a victim of a WPV incident (Van Voorhis et al., 1991; Wright and Saylor, 1991; Findorff et al., 2005; Tolin and Foa, 2006; Wells et al., 2006). In their review of the literature on sex differences in PTSD, Olff et al. (2007) found that women may be more vulnerable in terms of the cognitive appraisal of potentially traumatic violent events. Compared to men, women tend to appraise events as being more stressful and as inducing higher loss of personal control, which may impact upon the use of efficient coping strategies when they face stressful situations (Olff et al., 2007). This higher sensitivity among women could lead to a higher risk of developing psychological consequences following a WPV incident (Bryant and Harvey, 2003; Green and Diaz, 2008).

The absence of a moderating effect of professional identity on the relation between sex and psychological consequences may also contribute to research on highly sex-segregated professions such as law enforcement (more men) and healthcare (more women). For example, McCarty et al. (2007) demonstrated that the sex of the officer is important with regards to the impact of work-related stress since female officers often feel additional pressure from their male colleagues to prove themselves on the job. The current study suggests that this pressure may not be moderated by professional identity. In other words, being a man in a female-dominated occupation or a woman in a male-dominated occupation does not seem to amplify or dampen the consequences of WPV victimization. Future research should thus examine this added pressure on the opposite sex in highly sex-segregated professions in terms of either an acute or chronic stressor.

Age was found to be a predictor of psychological consequences for law enforcers only while 12-month past victimization was a predictor for healthcare workers only. Age could be interpreted as a proxy of years of service and thus, as a proxy of past victimization over several years. As shown by our results, law enforcers were more exposed to incidents of WPV per year, and thus, over their career. Consequently, 12-month victimization for healthcare workers and career victimization (as measured through age) for law enforcers was related to psychological consequences. This finding is consistent with studies that have positively associated exposure to WPV in healthcare and law enforcement settings to psychological consequences, especially PTSD (Brown et al., 1999; Lam, 2002). Moreover, it could be explained through a repetitive exposure hypothesis, which refers to criterion A4 of the PTSD diagnostic (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

However, to understand the importance of age for law enforcers and of prior victimization for healthcare workers, professional identity may provide a useful hypothesis. Given that dealing with violence is more salient in the professional identity of law enforcement—they are trained to manage violence in our societies—than that of healthcare, it is hypothesized that the professional identity of law enforcers provides more cognitive schemata (Serpe and Stryker, 2011) that help them to cope more easily with WPV victimization. As such, bivariate results of the present study showed that a higher proportion of law enforcers thought that WPV was part of their job than healthcare workers. On the other hand, even though healthcare workers have some training in dealing with patient aggression, dealing with violence is not their first mandate. Their professional identity provides less meanings or values that may help them to cope with their exposure. Thus, it may take more repetitive and long-lasting exposure in order for WPV to psychologically affect law enforcers, whereas a 12-month accumulation may be enough to affect healthcare workers. Longitudinal studies would allow for the verification of such a hypothesis.

Injury with hospitalization was positively associated with psychological consequences only for law enforcers. It is hypothesized that hospitalization may be an indicator of the severity of the injury and as such, law enforcers are likely to experience more severe injuries than healthcare workers. Severity of the injury has been positively associated with psychological consequences following the incident (Jeavons, 2000; Aquino and Thau, 2009; Liu et al., 2014).

Impact of social support factors on psychological consequences

Support from colleagues and the employer was negatively associated with psychological consequences for both healthcare workers and law enforcers. These findings contradict Lavoie et al. (2016) who found no association between social support and the expression of PTSD symptoms among nurses. However, they are consistent with Martin et al.’s (2009) study among police officers that showed that social support from colleagues is a significant protective factor of PTSD. They are also consistent with Stephens and Long (1999) who found, among 527 New Zealand Police officers, that greater support from the supervisor was significantly and negatively related to PTSD symptoms regardless of the level of trauma. Talking about trauma is particularly effective when shared with those who have experienced similar events (Williams, 1993). The importance of social support may be linked to the fact that adequate support is associated with feelings of being understood, appraisal of potentially stressful events as being less threatening, enhanced sense of control or mastery, increased self-esteem, and use of active coping strategies (Southwick et al., 2016). In contrast, low post-trauma social support is a consistent risk factor for PTSD (Ozer et al., 2008). In sum, social support provided by employers or colleagues may represent a protective factor for healthcare workers as well as for law enforcers.

Impact of trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences

The results revealed that perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV was associated with psychological consequences. For both male and female participants regardless of their profession, perceiving a taboo associated with complaining about WPV may inhibit coping strategies such as support-seeking and increase the psychological consequences of WPV. The results also suggested that for male healthcare workers, normalization reduced psychological consequences, and thus appeared to be an adequate coping strategy.

At first hand, these sex-differentiated findings are consistent with studies on stress and sex, which suggest significant differences in the perceptions and coping skills of male and female workers (Barnett et al., 1987; Brown and Campbell, 1990; He et al., 2002). According to Matud (2004), men tend to use more instrumental coping while women are more likely to use emotion-focused coping strategies such as emotional discharge. Moreover, this reflects the socialization hypothesis that suggests that men are socialized to use more active and instrumental strategies while women are socialized to use passive and emotion-focused strategies such as relying on social support (Ptacek et al., 1992). Thus, using learned and reinforced coping strategies may protect from psychological consequences. On the other hand, inhibiting them may contribute to the development of psychological distress.

However, our findings indicate that sex differences only apply to healthcare workers. A possible explanation for this result may lie in the John-Wayne syndrome, which implies that men are expected to maintain a high level of toughness and play things close to the chest when it comes to violence (Wells et al., 2006). It is possible that male healthcare workers feel that they have to protect their female colleagues and thus develop adaptive cognitions toward WPV, which they integrate in their professional identity. This adaptation also helps them cope with WPV. Future research is needed to test this hypothesis.

Policy and clinical implications

The findings of this study suggest that professional identity, sex, and perceptions regarding WPV have a significant impact on the psychological consequences of WPV for healthcare and law enforcement workers, which leads to multiple policy and clinical implications. First, the findings imply that men working in healthcare may benefit from the normalization of WPV. For these men, accepting that violence is part of their job may prevent a number of psychological consequences related to exposure to WPV as it reinforces socially learned coping strategies. Thus, training and supervision may be adapted for male healthcare workers in order to help them frame violence in the boundaries of their work. Like Åkerström (2002) concluded for nurses, as long as men define their experiences according to the boundaries of their profession, they can maintain a psychological state that allows them to do their job.

Second, our results suggest that an organization seeking to help their employees cope with WPV may need to reduce the taboo associated with complaining about WPV since it may hinder the use of adequate coping strategies such as support-seeking, regardless of the profession. As shown in a previous study, organizational factors such as employer and colleague support as well as zero-tolerance policies may reduce this taboo thus giving organizations levers to intervene (Geoffrion et al., 2015).

Third, the findings bolster the role of support from colleagues and employer in reducing the psychological consequences of WPV. ‘Peer-support’ interventions in which workers are encouraged to talk about their traumatic experience with trained colleagues who are sympathetic and supportive could thus represent an adequate organizational strategy to counter the consequences of WPV (Stephens et al., 1997).

Fourth, the results point to investigating prior WPV victimization differentially according to the profession. The impact of the accumulation of exposure to WPV tends to manifest itself later for law enforcement than healthcare workers. For healthcare workers, organizations should assess recent repetitive exposure. For law enforcers, organizations should consider repetitive exposure over the career.

Study limitations

As the sampling method was not probability based, the results refer to the province of Quebec and the specific sectors under study. Future research should consider larger and more representative samples in order to generalize the accuracy of these findings. Furthermore, data may have been collected only from people who were willing to discuss or complain about WPV. It is also possible that the distribution of the questionnaire by a member of a joint association for health and safety at work and the nature of the survey may have influenced the prevalence of respondents who think that violence is ‘part of the job’; workers who wanted to complete the questionnaire were the ones who wanted to denounce WPV, not the ones who accept it as a reality of their work. There is also a potential limitation stemming from the fact that healthcare and law enforcement workers self-reported their experience of WPV; social desirability may have influenced their responses (Moorman and Podsakoff, 1992). In order to minimize recall bias, the questionnaire only focused on victimization that occurred during the past year. As mentioned by Nachreiner et al. (2007), this method has successfully been used in previous studies.

Conclusion

More research is needed in order to assess the consequences of trivialization of WPV on psychological consequences and its mediating effect. In this vein, further research should rely on prospective and longitudinal design using random sampling while controlling for other important individual and organizational characteristics, such as personal history of abuse, years of experience, and organizational strategies that aim to prevent psychological distress. These studies should also use valid instruments to assess PTSD according to the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013) criteria, such as the PCL-5 (Weathers et al., 2013), and other psychological distress manifestations. Moreover, the findings of the current study demonstrate the importance of simultaneously assessing individual and organizational factors. Thus, future research should include other variables related to the individual and to the organization and test the interactions between these variables. Future studies should also integrate measures of gender (i.e. masculinity–femininity) as results show that the law enforcement and healthcare professions are highly sex segregated. As such, women working in law enforcement may identify as more masculine than females in healthcare and vice verse for males. This could provide important information regarding the psychological consequences of WPV. Nevertheless, the current study demonstrated that workers and their organizations should encourage employees to freely discuss WPV since it may contribute to well-being at work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relating to the material presented in this article. Its contents, including any opinions and/or conclusions expressed, are solely those of the authors.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by scholarships awarded to the first author by the Fonds de la Recherche du Québec—Société et culture (FRQSC), the Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité au Travail (IRSST), the International Center for Comparative Criminology (ICCC), and the Foundation of Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal and by a research grant awarded to the VISAGE research team by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR—TVG251591). We thank the healthcare workers and law enforcers who participated in this study. We also thank Josette Sader for her precious editing of the manuscript. A special thanks goes to reviewers and editors who provided helpful comments that enhanced the quality of this article.

References

  1. AbuAlRub RF, Al-Asmar AH. (2011) Physical violence in the workplace among Jordanian hospital nurses. J Transcult Nurs; 22: 157–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Åkerström M. (2002) Slaps, punches, pinches—but not violence: boundary-work in nursing homes for the elderly. Symb Interact; 25: 515–36. [Google Scholar]
  3. American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. 4th edn (text rev). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. [Google Scholar]
  4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aquino K, Thau S. (2009) Workplace victimization: aggression from the target’s perspective. Annu Rev Psychol; 60: 717–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Armstrong GS, Griffin ML. (2004) Does the job matter? Comparing correlates of stress among treatment and correctional staff in prisons. J Crim Justice; 32: 577–92. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arnetz JE, Arnetz BB. (2001) Violence towards health care staff and possible effects on the quality of patient care. Soc Sci Med; 52: 417–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ballenger JF, Best SR, Metzler TJ, et al. (2010). Patterns and predictors of alcohol use in male and female urban police officers. Am J Addict; 20: 21–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barnett RC, Biener LE, Baruch GK. (1987) Gender and stress. New York, NY: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown JM, Campbell EA. (1990) Sources of occupational stress in the police. Work Stress; 4: 305–18. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown JM, Fielding J, Grover J. (1999) Distinguishing traumatic, vicarious and routine operational stressor exposure and attendant adverse consequences in a sample of police officers. Work Stress; 13: 312–25. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bryant RA, Harvey AG. (2003) Gender differences in the relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder following motor vehicle accidents. Aust NZ J; 37: 226–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chapman R, Perry L, Styles I, et al. (2009) Consequences of workplace violence directed at nurses. Br J Nurs; 18: 1256–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chappell D, Di Martino V. (2006) Violence at work. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cone JE, Li J, Kornblith E, et al. (2015). Chronic probable PTSD in police responders in the world trade center health registry ten to eleven years after 9/11. Am J Ind Med; 58: 483–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dang C, Denis C, Gahide S, et al. (2016). Violence at work: forensic medical examination of police officers assaulted while on duty: comparisons with other groups of workers in two centres of the Paris area, 2010–2012. Int Arch Occup Environ; 89: 755–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Delahanty DL, Raimonde AJ, Spoonster E, et al. (2003) Injury severity, prior trauma history, urinary cortisol levels, and acute PTSD in motor vehicle accident victims. J Anxiety Disord; 17: 149–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Demir D, Rodwell J. (2012) Psychosocial antecedents and consequences of workplace aggression for hospital nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh; 44: 376–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Terte I, Stephens C, Huddleston L. (2014) The development of a three part model of psychological resilience. Stress Health; 30: 416–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dick P. (2000) The social construction of the meaning of acute stressors: a qualitative study of the personal accounts of police officers using a stress counselling service. Work Stress; 14: 226–44. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dyrkacz AP, Mak LY, Heck CS. (2012) Work-related injuries in Canadian occupational therapy practice. Can J Occup Ther, 79: 237–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Erickson L, Williams-Evans SA. (2000) Attitudes of emergency nurses regarding patient assaults. J Emerg Nur; 26: 210–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Findorff MJ, McGovern PM, Wall MM, et al. (2005). Reporting violence to a health care employer: a cross-sectional study. AAOHN J; 53: 399–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. First MB, Gibbon M, Spitzer RL, et al. (1996). User’s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders—research version. New York, NY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fitzpatrick KM, Wilson M. (1999). Exposure to violence and posttraumatic stress symptomatology among abortion clinic workers. J Trauma Stress; 12: 227–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Fleischmann MH, Strode P, Broussard B, et al. (2016). Law enforcement officers’ perceptions of and responses to traumatic events: a survey of officers completing Crisis Intervention Team training. Polic Soc; 1–8. Published online 19 September 2016, doi:10.1080/10439463.2016.1234469. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gabert-Quillen CA, Fallon W, Delahanty DL. (2011) PTSD after traumatic injury: an investigation of the impact of injury severity and peritraumatic moderators. J Health Psychol; 16: 678–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gates DM, Gillespie GL, Succop P. (2011) Violence against nurses and its impact on stress and productivity. Nurs Econ; 29: 59–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Geoffrion S, Lanctôt N, Marchand A, et al. (2015) Predictors of trivialization of workplace violence among healthcare workers and law enforcers. J Threat Assess Manag; 2: 195–213. [Google Scholar]
  30. George D, Mallery P. (2003) SPSS for windows steps by steps: a simple guide and reference 11.0 update. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gillespie GL, Bresler S, Gates DM, et al. (2013) Posttraumatic stress symptomatology among emergency department workers following workplace aggression. Workplace Health Saf; 61: 247–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Graef R. (1990) Talking blues: the police in their own words. London, UK: Fontana. [Google Scholar]
  33. Green DW. (2016). Traumatic stress, world assumptions, and law enforcement officers. CUNY Academic Works; Available at http://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1387 Accessed 15 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  34. Green DL, Diaz N. (2008) Gender differences in coping with victimization. Brief Treat Crisis Interv; 8: 195–203. [Google Scholar]
  35. He N, Zhao J, Archbold CA. (2002) Gender and police stress: the convergent and divergent impact of work environment, work-family conflict, and stress coping mechanisms of female and male police officers. Policing; 25: 687–708. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jackson D, Clare J, Mannix J. (2002) Who would want to be a nurse? Violence in the workplace—a factor in recruitment and retention. J Nurs Manag; 10: 13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jeavons S. (2000). Predicting who suffers psychological trauma in the first year after a road accident. Behav Res Ther; 38: 499–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson JL, Greaves L, Repta R. (2007) Better science with sex and gender: a primer for health research. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Women’s Health Research Network. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jones J, Lyneham J. (2001) Violence: part of the job for Australian nurses? Aust Emerg Nurs J; 4: 10–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lam LT. (2002). Aggression exposure and mental health among nurses. Aust e-J Advanc Ment Health; 1: 89–100. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lanctôt N, Guay S. (2014). The aftermath of workplace violence among healthcare workers: a systematic literature review of the consequences. Aggress Violent Behav; 19: 492–501. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lavoie S, Talbot LR, Mathieu L, et al. (2016) An exploration of factors associated with post-traumatic stress in ER nurses. J Nurs Manag; 24: 174–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lilly MM, Pole N, Best SR, et al. (2009) Gender and PTSD: what can we learn from female police officers? J Anxiety Disord; 23: 767–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu B, Tarigan LH, Bromet EJ, et al. (2014) World trade center disaster exposure-related probable posttraumatic stress disorder among responders and civilians: a meta-analysis. PLoS One; 9: e101491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Macdonald G, Sirotich F. (2001) Reporting client violence. Soc Work; 46: 107–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Martin M, Marchand A, Boyer R, et al. (2009) Predictors of the development of posttraumatic stress disorder among police officers. J Trauma Dissociation; 10: 451–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Matud MP. (2004) Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Pers Indiv Differ; 37: 1401–15. [Google Scholar]
  48. McCarty WP, Zhao J, Garland BE. (2007) Occupational stress and burnout between male and female police officers: are there any gender differences? Policing; 30: 672–91. [Google Scholar]
  49. Ménard KS, Arter ML. (2014). Stress, coping, alcohol use, and posttraumatic stress disorder among an international sample of police officers: does gender matter? Police Q; 17, 307–27. [Google Scholar]
  50. Menzel NN, Brooks SM, Bernard TE, et al. (2004) The physical workload of nursing personnel: association with musculoskeletal discomfort. Int J Nurs Stud; 41: 859–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Moorman RH, Podsakoff PM. (1992) A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. J Occup Organ Psychol; 65: 131–49. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nachreiner NM, Gerberich SG, Ryan AD, et al. (2007) Minnesota nurses’ study: perceptions of violence and the work environment. Ind Health; 45: 672–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nijman HL, Allertz WF, Merckelbach H, et al. (1997) Aggressive behaviour on an acute psychiatric admissions ward. Eur J Psychiat; 11: 106–14. [Google Scholar]
  54. Olff M, Langeland W, Draijer N, et al. (2007) Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychol Bull; 133: 183–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ozer EJ, Best SR, Lipsey TL, et al. (2008) Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder and symptoms in adults: a meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  56. Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, et al. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology; 36: 859–66. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pich J, Hazelton M, Sundin D, et al. (2011) Patient-related violence at triage: a qualitative descriptive study. Int Emerg Nurs; 19: 12–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Piquero NL, Piquero AR, Craig JM, et al. (2013) Assessing research on workplace violence, 2000–2012. Aggress Violent Behav; 18: 383–94. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ptacek JT, Smith RE, Zanas J. (1992). Gender, appraisal, and coping: a longitudinal analysis. J Personal; 60: 747–70. [Google Scholar]
  60. Rippon TJ. (2000). Aggression and violence in health care professions. J Adv Nurs; 31: 452–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Santos A, Leather P, Dunn J, et al. (2009) Gender differences in exposure to co-worker and public-initiated violence: assessing the impact of work-related violence and aggression in police work. Work Stress; 23: 137–54. [Google Scholar]
  62. Serpe RT, Stryker S. (2011). The symbolic interactionist perspective and identity theory. In Schwartz SJ, Luyckx K, Vignoles VL, editors. Handbook of identity theory and research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; pp. 225–48. [Google Scholar]
  63. Skorikov VB, Vondracek FW. (2011) Occupational identity. In Schwartz SJ, Luyckx K, Vignoles VL, editors. Handbook of identity theory and research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer; pp. 693–714. [Google Scholar]
  64. Southwick SM, Sippel L, Krystal J, et al. (2016) Why are some individuals more resilient than others: the role of social support. World Psychiatry; 15: 77–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Stephens C, Long N. (1999) Posttraumatic stress disorder in the New Zealand police: the moderating role of social support following traumatic stress. Anxiety Stress Coping; 12: 247–64. [Google Scholar]
  66. Stephens C, Long N, Miller I. (1997) The impact of trauma and social support on posttraumatic stress disorder: a study of New Zealand police officers. J Crim Justice; 25: 303–14. [Google Scholar]
  67. Thoits PA. (1999) Self, identity, stress, and mental health. In Aneshensel CS, Phelan JC, editors. Handbook of the sociology of mental health. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press; pp. 345–68. [Google Scholar]
  68. Tolin DF, Foa EB. (2006) Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: a quantitative review of 25 years of research. Psychol Bull; 132: 959–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Trossman S. (2006). Not ‘part of the job’. Nurses want to put an end to workplace violence. Am Nurse; 38: 1, 6–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Van Voorhis P, Cullen FT, Link BG, et al. (1991) The impact of race and gender on correctional officers’ orientation to the integrated environment. J Res Crime Delinq; 28: 472–500. [Google Scholar]
  71. Walsht BR, Clarke E. (2003). Post-trauma symptoms in health workers following physical and verbal aggression. Work Stress; 17: 170–81. [Google Scholar]
  72. Weathers F, Litz B, Keane T, et al. (2013) The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) National Center for PTSD; Available at www.ptsd.va.gov Accessed 15 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  73. Wells T, Colbert S, Slate RN. (2006) Gender matters differences in state probation officer stress. J Contemp Crim Justice; 22: 63–79. [Google Scholar]
  74. Whittington R. (2002) Attitudes toward patient aggression amongst mental health nurses in the ‘zero tolerance’ era: associations with burnout and length of experience. J Clin Nurs; 11: 819–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Williams T. (1993) Trauma in the workplace. In Wilson JP, Raphael B, editors. International handbook of traumatic stress syndromes. New York, NY: Plenum Press; pp. 925–33. [Google Scholar]
  76. Wilson CM, Douglas KS, Lyon DR. (2011) Violence against teachers: prevalence and consequences. J Interpers Violence; 26: 2353–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wright KN, Saylor WG. (1991) Male and female employees’ perceptions of prison work: is there a difference? Justice Q; 8: 505–24. [Google Scholar]
  78. Zatzick DF, Kang SM, Müller HG, et al. (2002). Predicting posttraumatic distress in hospitalized trauma survivors with acute injuries. Am J Psychiatry; 159: 941–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Zatzick DF, Rivara FP, Nathens AB, et al. (2007) A nationwide US study of post-traumatic stress after hospitalization for physical injury. Psycholo Med; 37: 1469–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Work Exposures and Health are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES