Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Orthop Res. 2019 May 17;37(8):1698–1708. doi: 10.1002/jor.24318

Effects of surgical angiogenesis on segmental bone reconstruction with cryopreserved massive-structural allografts in a porcine tibia model

Noortje J Visser 1, Elisa S Rezaie 1, Patricia F Friedrich 1, Dimitra Kotsougiani 1,2, Alexander Y Shin 1, Allen T Bishop 1
PMCID: PMC6824922  NIHMSID: NIHMS1024823  PMID: 31042307

Abstract

Cryopreserved bone allografts (CBA) used to reconstruct segmental bone defects provide immediate structural stability, but are vulnerable to infection, non-union and late stress fracture as the majority of the allograft remains largely avascular. We sought to improve the bone vascularity and bone formation of CBAs by surgical angiogenesis with an implanted arteriovenous (AV) bundle, using a porcine tibial defect model.

Cryopreserved tibial bone allografts were transplanted in swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) mismatched Yucatan minipigs to reconstruct a 3.5cm segmental tibial defect. A cranial tibial AV-bundle was placed within its intramedullary canal to induce angiogenesis. The AV bundle was patent in 8 pigs and ligated in a control group of 8 pigs. At 20 weeks neo-angiogenesis was evaluated by micro-angiography. Bone formation was measured by quantitative histomorphometry and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT).

Seven of 8 AV-bundles in the revascularized group were patent. One had thrombosed due to allograft displacement. Total vascular volume was higher in the revascularized allografts compared to the ligated group (p=0.015). Revascularized allografts had increased levels of bone formation on the allograft endosteal surface compared to the ligated control group (p=0.05).

Surgical angiogenesis of porcine tibial CBAs by intramedullary implantation of an AV-bundle creates an enhanced autogenous neoangiogenic circulation and accelerates active bone formation on allograft endosteal surfaces.

Keywords: Bone, allograft, angiogenesis, revascularization, porcine

Introduction

Treatment of large segmental bone defects created by limb-sparing tumor resection, infection and traumatic loss has significant morbidity with all currently available methods, including vascularized autografts, prosthetic replacement, bone transport, and use of structural cryopreserved bone allografts (CBA). 17; 8 Vascularized autologous bone provides superior rates of healing and remodeling than banked allogeneic bone.9 Unfortunately, only a few donor sites (chiefly fibula and iliac crest) are available, with generally poor size- and shape match and significant donor site morbidity. Cryopreserved allogeneic bone can be stored in tissue banks and matched preoperatively to provide an immediately stable reconstruction. Their lack of cellular and vascular viability however makes CBAs susceptible to infection, and non-union. Limited ability to revascularize over time subsequently prevents bone remodeling in response to loading, resulting in late stress fractures.

Surgical revascularization of structural allograft bone has been demonstrated by angiogenesis from implanted AV bundles or fascial flaps in small laboratory animal models resulting in improved blood flow, healing and active remodeling.10; 11 Using sex-mismatched transplantation, laser capture microdissection and PCR amplification, we have demonstrated the lineage of osteocytes in areas of active new bone formation to be circulation-derived from the recipient animal in a rat femoral model. 12 Others have reported similar remodeling when a periosteal sleeve was left behind to envelop an orthotopically-placed allograft. 13 The angiogeneic effect has been demonstrated to be amplified with the use of growth factors when delivered by osmotic pumps, biodegradable microspheres or endothelial cell transfection (gene therapy).11; 1416 Such surgical angiogenesis may prove of value in improving outcomes for many patients in whom cryopreserved bone segments are used to span large segmental gaps resulting from limb-sparing tumor surgery, trauma, congenital deformity or osteomyelitis.

Miniature swine have distinct advantages for allogeneic tissue research, particularly as a bridge to clinical application. Their size, anatomy, physiology and immunology are well known and comparable to man. Most importantly, both blood type and the swine major histocompatibility haplotypes (the swine leucocyte antigen or SLA complex) have been well defined, the latter determined by routine DNA sequencing. For bone, orthotopic reconstruction of segmental bone defects in porcine hindlimbs uses surgical techniques and implants identical to clinical practice. Their physiology, including rate of new bone formation is nearly identical to man17. A number of vascularized composite allotransplantation studies have taken place using miniature swine, including skin, muscle and bone, bone marrow, and composite knee joint1823 transplants. Prior to clinical implementation however, confirmation in a large animal model is desirable. The anatomic and physiologic similarities between pig and man make a porcine model ideal for such a study.

It is our hypothesis that an AV bundle implanted within a cryopreserved CBA will facilitate angiogenesis, resulting in an increased number of intramedullary vessels as well as active bone formation of the previously necrotic endosteal surface of the graft in a large animal model.

Methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. A total of 20 female Yucatan minipigs were used, provided by Sinclair Bio Resources, LLC, all with defined swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) haplotypes. The animals averaged 26 kg in weight, and were 6 months of age. Sixteen pigs comprised two experimental groups of eight. Four additional pigs were used exclusively as donors for the first eight tibial allografts.

In all animals, a 3.5cm tibial segment was removed from the proximal tibial diaphysis, the defect comprises about 30% of the diaphysis with an average diaphyseal length of 11cm. This defect is in excess of a 3.0 cm critical defect used by a previous investigator13. In the first 8 experimental pigs, the excised tibia segment was stored at −80°C for a minimum of one month, and used as the CBA for later animals. In all animals, the tibial defect was immediately replaced with a sized-matched cryopreserved allograft, obtained from a donor with a major SLA mismatch. The donor bones for the first 8 pigs were obtained from the four additional pigs exclusively used as donors. The excised tibia segment from the first 8 pigs served as donors for the last 8 pigs. Implantation of a patent arteriovenous bundle within the tibia provided surgical angiogenesis. In the ligated group, the AV bundle was implanted but ligated proximally to prevent angiogenesis in an otherwise identical procedure. In all animals, the contralateral undisturbed tibia was used to normalize values.

To harvest the first 8 grafts, 4 Yucatan minipigs were anesthetized with Tiletamine HCL + Zolazepam HCL 5 mg/kg IM (Telazol 100 mg/ml, Zoetis inc, Kalamazoo, MI.), Xylazine 2 mg/kg IM (Xylamed 100 mg/ml, Bimeda-MTC, Cambridge ON, Canada) and euthanized with Pentobarbital Sodium 390mg/ml (Vortech Dearborn MI, 0.22 ml/kg IV). A 3.5cm tibial mid-diaphyseal segment was removed bilaterally under sterile conditions, beginning proximally at a point 1 cm distal to the tibial tubercle using a cutting jig for precision. The marrow was removed, the bone rinsed with sterile saline, and then stored at −80°C for at least one month.

All remaining surgical procedures were performed under inhalational anesthesia. Induction of anesthesia was performed with injection of Tiletamine HCL + Zolazepam HCL 5 mg/kg IM, Xylazine 2 mg/kg IM and Glycopyrrolate 0.01mg/kg IM (Novaplus/Vizient 0.2 mg/ml, Chicago IL). Venous access was gained through the ear vein and used for fluid administration (Ringer’s lactate, average 1000 ml/procedure IV) and drug administration. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was given in the form of Cefalozin 1 gram IV (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL). The pig was intubated and inhalation anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane (1-3% inhalation). The leg was washed with iodine; a sterile field was created with surgical drapes and adhesive iodine incision drapes (Ioban, 3M Health Care, St Paul, MN). Through a 10cm anterolateral incision along the cranial ridge of the tibia, the cranial compartment musculature was dissected from the tibia. The cranial tibial artery and vein were identified between the cranial tibial muscle and the lateral surface of the tibia, ligated at the ankle and elevated as an AV bundle with proximal inflow. A 3.5cm tibial bone segment was removed, prepared and stored at −80°C for potential later use as described above. The pre-selected SLA-mismatched allograft was thawed in sterile saline. It was positioned into the matched tibial defect, threading the AV bundle through the medullary canal from proximal to distal. A small burr was used to create a small window at the bone junction sites to pass the AV bundle. In the ligated group, the bundle was then ligated proximally to obstruct the blood flow. (Figure 1+2) Osteosynthesis was performed with a 9-hole 2.7mm locking compression plate spanning the allograft on the medial side (Synthes, Monument, CO). The plate was applied to the allograft with two unicortical locking screws, to the proximal and distal tibial segments with 3 bicortical screws each (1 compression and 2 locking screws). The fascia and subcutaneous tissue were closed with 2-0 braided polyglactin (Vicryl, Ethicon, Somerville NJ) and the skin with subcuticular 3-0 polyglactin sutures. A compressive and occlusive dressing was applied (Dermabond Prineo Skin Closure System, Ethicon, San Lorenzo, Puerto Rico and Tegaderm, 3M, St Paul, MN). The first radiographs were taken immediately postoperatively. Full weight bearing and unrestricted movement was allowed following the surgery. Excede 5 mg/kg IM every 5days (Pfizer, NY, NY) and Baytril 10mg/kg IM daily (Bayer Healthcare, Shawnee Mission KS) were given postoperatively for 2 weeks. Buprenorphine SR 0.18mg/kg (10mg/ml ZooPharm, Windsor, CO) was given prior to surgery and repeated after 72 hours. Carprofen 4mg/kg IM (Rymadyl, Zoetis Inc, Kalamazoo, MI) was given in the first 5 days after surgery and continued when necessary.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Surgical revascularization of a cryopreserved tibial bone allograft in a porcine model. First image: the anatomy of a porcine tiba bone with popliteal artery, the caudal tibial artery and the cranial tibial artery. Second image: the 3.5cm tibia bone segment is removed. Third image: the technique used in the revascularised group: transplantation of the CBA, the cranial tibial artery and vein are distally ligated and inserted into the intramedullary canal (arrows). The CBA is fixated with a plate and screws. Fourth image: the technique used in the control group: transplantation of the CBA, the cranial tibial artery/vein both distally and proximally ligated (arrow) and inserted into the intramedullary canal. The CBA is fixated with a plate and screws.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Intra-operative pictures of the cryopreserved allograft with an implanted AV-bundle. (A) Porcine tibia, view from medial. (B) Arteriovenous bundle consisting of the cranial tibial artery and vein (arrow) distally ligated with a suture. (C) View from cranial: transplanted CBA with the arteriovenous bundle placed intramedullary through the burred hole proximally (arrow) end fixated with a plate medially. (D) View from medial.

Radiograph assessment: Bone Healing

Radiographs were obtained at surgery, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 20 weeks after sedation with Telazol (5 mg/kg IM) and Xylazine (2 mg/kg IM). The radiographs were taken at 91.4 cm, with exposure settings at 70kVp and 5mAs. Bone healing was assessed with a bone healing score designed and used for assessment of cortical allografts.24; 25 (Table 1) All radiographs were scored by two blinded observers.

Table 1.

Radiographic Evaluation of Osseous Healing and Transplant Incorporation Modified After Taira et al.25

Periosteal reaction (prox. and dist. separately

None 0
Minimal (<25%) 1
Medium (25-50%) 2
Moderate (50-75%) 3
Complete (75-100%) 4

Callus Remodeling (prox. and dist. separately)

None 0
Partial 2
Complete 4

Union (prox. and dist. Separately

Total line 0
Partial line 2
Union 4

Graft appearance

Resorption −1
No change 0
Periosteal reaction from the graft 1

Max. Total* 25
*

The maximum score for a vascularized transplant with periosteal reaction that is fully healed and remodeled both distally and proximally in 25 points.

Fluorochrome labeling: Histomorphometry

Fourteen and 4 days prior to sacrifice, calcein (Sigma, St Louis, MO 20mg/kg) and oxytetracycline hydrochloride (Vetrimycin 100mg, Boise, ID. 20mg/kg) fluorescent labels were administered intramuscularly, respectively for subsequent histomorphometric measurements of bone formation occurring during this 10-day time point. Any observed differences between the two groups can be attributed to the effect of a patent implanted AV bundle. Angiogenesis from the bundle growing into the medullary bone may allow cell migration and survival, and ultimately new bone formation. This process essentially is ‘revitalizing’ the necrotic allogeneic bone.

Sacrifice

The survival time was 20 weeks; the pigs were euthanized as described above in the first 4 donor pigs. Both lower extremities were disarticulated at the hip. A catheter was placed in the femoral artery and the vasculature of the lower extremity irrigated with 150ml of a saline/heparin solution. Subsequently, Microfil (Flow Tech, Inc. Carver, MA) was injected under physiologic pressure (100-120 mm/Hg) using a syringe pump. Microfil is a radiopaque silicone rubber that fills the capillaries with a low resistance due to the low viscosity (25 centipoise) and has been widely used in previous micro-CT studies.26 Directly following sacrifice the operated and contralateral tibial bones were removed. At this time, the AV bundle was identified and noted to be patent or thrombosed based upon Microfil filling. Micro-computed tomographic scans were then made of all tibiae using a micro-CT system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA). Scanning parameters were 60 KeV, 500 μA, 180 projections with 188.5μm thickness slides and a low magnification. These images were used to visualize the intraosseous vasculature and analyze bone formation.

Vessel volume – Micro-CT

A 2cm segment of the central part of the graft and the contralateral tibia were used for microangiography. The segment was cut using a Diamond band saw (Exakt Technologies, Oklahoma City, OK, USA). The bone segments were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 48 hours followed by decalcifying solution (Thermo Scientific, Baltimore, MD) for seven weeks, changed weekly. The decalcified bone segments were imaged using the micro-CT. Scanning parameters were 60 KeV, 500 μA, 360 projections with 53.9 μm thickness slides and a high magnification. The vascular volume occupied by Microfil was measured using the Bone Microarchitecture Analysis (BMA) module in the Analyze 12.0 software (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). After assessing all images, an optimal signal threshold was determined to provide the best contrast between the decalcified bone and the Microfil, removing the background noise, with further refinement by including only the 250 largest connected vascular regions. Cortical and medullary vascularization were distinguished based on the difference in bone density. In this manner, a standardized vascular volume measurement in mm3 was possible. The total vessel volume and the percentage of bone volume occupied by vessel were calculated as shown in table 2.

Table 2.

Vascular Volume, contralateral side (cl), ligated group (cg), revascularization group (rg)

Contra-lateral (cl)
(n=16)
Ligated group (cg)
(n=8)
Revas-cularized group (rg)
(n=7)
p-value
cl-cg
P-value
cl-rg
p-value
cg-rg
Total Vessel Volume (TVV), mm3 29 ± 13 55 ± 47 127 ± 50 0.123 0.018 0.015
TVV/Total Bone Volume (%) 0.92 ± 0.38 0.77 ± 0.46 2.0 ± 0.65 0.484 0.028 0.004

Medullary Vessel Volume (MVV), mm3 7.4 ± 6.0 2.7 ± 2.1 58 ± 22 0.208 0.018 0.001
MVV/volume medullary bone (%) 0.84 ±0.75 0.72 ± 0.68 11 ± 4.6 0.889 0.018 0.001

Cortical Vessel Volume (CVV), mm3 22 ± 10 52 ± 47 68 ± 46 0.093 0.018 0.298
CVV/volume cortical bone (%) 0.72 ± 0.27 0.75 ± 0.49 1.0 ± 0.4 0.866 0.176 0.247

Quantitative Histomorphometry

A 2.5mm bone segment of the graft was removed and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Fifteen μm-thick sections were cut using a Diamond band saw. Hematoxylin and eosin staining were performed as a standard. Unstained slides were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy at a magnification of 20x (Olympus BX51) with bone image analysis software (Osteomeasure; Osteometrics, Atlanta, GA), using the known elapsed time between differentially-colored double fluorescent calcein and oxytetracycline labels to quantify bone formation.25 Histomorphometric parameters were determined for both the inner and outer cortical layer by analyzing two fields per cortical layer for each of the three sides of the triangularly-shaped bone, making a total of 12 analyzed fields per slide. The Mineralizing bone Surface to total Bone Surface (MS/BS) ratio represents the proportion of bone that is actively mineralizing, including all double-labeled surfaces and half of the single label surfaces. The Mineral Apposition Rate (MAR) represents the average rate at which new bone mineral is being deposited and was calculated from the distance between the two fluorescent labels (calcein and oxytetracycline) divided by the 10 days separating the administration of the labels. In samples where only single labels or too few double labels were present, a minimum value of 0.1 mcm/d was assigned, to decrease bias resulting from data exclusion.27 The Bone Formation Rate to Bone Volume ratio (BFR/BV), a measure of bone turnover rate, was calculated by multiplying MAR by the ratio of labeled bone surface to bone volume (BFR/BV [μm3/μm3/year]).28

Statistical Analysis

The results of the analyses of the operated leg were compared with the normal, non-operated contralateral leg. Histomorphometry, bone mineral density and bone volume were expressed in absolute values of the graft and normalized values as a percentage of the contralateral side. Volume was expressed in absolute values and as a percentage of the bone volume.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test to detect differences between groups (conventional grafts versus revascularized grafts) and the paired Wilcoxon signed rank test to detect differences within each group (graft versus contralateral tibiae). Significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

The postoperative course was without significant complication in any of the 16 swine. Two animals had superficial suture-related infections that resolved with oral antibiotics. All animals ambulated without protection immediately following surgery. Two pigs avoided full weight-bearing on the operated leg for 14 days. By week 4, all pigs fully loaded the operated leg, although 8 pigs still had a slightly uneven stride. By 20 weeks all pigs had a normal stride.

CT-scan – Vessel volume

Seven AV-bundles in the revascularization group were patent and one thrombosed. This pig has been excluded from further analysis. The total vascular and intramedullary vascular volumes were significantly higher in the revascularization group compared to both the ligated group and the contralateral side (Table 2). This demonstrates the beneficial effect of an AV bundle placed within the medullary canal of a cryopreserved allograft. The absolute cortical bone vascular volume was significantly higher in the revascularization group compared to the contralateral tibia, but not significantly so in comparison to ligated controls. All patent bundles showed neovascularization extending into the cortical bone (Figure 3).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Neovascularization extending into the cortical bone in the revascularized group. Upper left: Neoangiogenesis imaged without the bone by setting the specific threshold for the intravascular Microfil. Upper right: Bone and neoangiogenic vessels seen (in red) in a transverse section. Lower figures: saggital (left) and coronal (right) sections of the tibia. In all different sections is the patent arteriovenous bundle is seen, with neovascularization extending into the cortical bone.

Bone formation: Histomorphometry and Micro-CT

Histomorphometric parameters in the structural allograft are shown in Table 3 and Figure 4, Measures of endosteal bone formation revealed a significant beneficial effect of AV bundle implantation. Bone turnover as measured by the BFR/BV ratio was significantly higher in the revascularization group compared to ligated group. The proportion of actively mineralizing bone surface (the MS/BS ratio) trended higher in the revascularization group. There were no significant differences in MAR. All significant measures of bone formation were found on the endosteal cortical surface, adjacent to the AV bundle. Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were not substantially different between the two groups (Figure 5).

Table 3.

Histomorphometry Graft of the ligated group and the revascularization group

Outer cortical area Inner cortical area

Parameter Absolute/Normalized Ligated group (n=8) Revascularized group (n=7) p-value Ligated group (n=8) Revascularized group (n=7) p-value

MS/BS (%) Graft values 138 ± 35 139 ± 28 0.908 66 ± 15 89 ± 29 0.083
Normalized values (%) 49 ± 36 41 ± 22 0.949 58 ± 17 85 ± 26 0.064

P value graft vs contralateral 0.012 0.018 0.012 0.128

MAR (μm/day) Graft values 2.7 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.3 0.418 2.6 ± 0.4 2.5 ± 0.3 1.000
Normalized values (%) 451 ± 830 450 ± 660 0.298 113 ± 21 138 ± 20 0.083

P value graft vs contralateral 0.012 0.018 0.025 0.018

BFR/BS (μm3/μm2/year) Graft values 1355 ± 426 1231 ± 282 0.418 631 ± 203 833 ± 316 0.247

Normalized values (%) 171 ± 181 268 ± 521 0.563 84 ± 47 119 ± 48 0.105

P value graft vs contralateral 0.779 0.463 0.123 0.753

BFR/BV (μm3/μm3/year) Graft values 358 ± 235 355 ± 83 0.418 299 ± 143 381 ± 64 0.049
Normalized values (%) 1315 ± 2624 1780 ± 3195 0.203 180 ± 78 304 ± 58 0.011

P value graft vs contralateral 0.012 0.028 0.025 0.028

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Dynamic histomorphometry, example of fluorescence slides with a 20× magnification; the slides are taken from the endosteal side of the cortical bone. The green label is calcein and the clear blue label is the tetracycline. The brown staining is the microfil inside the vessels.

A: Patent AV bundle group, B: ligated control group, C: contralateral side.

In the patent group, is an increased amount of fluorescence labels and more empty lacunae seen compared to the control group and contralateral side. These images confirm a higher bone turnover in the revascularized group, with new woven bone and some via.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Hematoxylin and eosin stained slides with a 20× magnification

A: vascularized group, B: allograft control group, C: contralateral side control.

The black material is Microfil contrast agent filling small vessels. There was no gross descriptive difference between groups on H&E stained slides.

Micro-CT analysis showed no difference in BV/TV or BS/BV ratios between the patent and ligated AV bundle. Both were significantly higher than contralateral tibial values (p=0.02 and p=0.01 respectively).

Bone Healing

The radiographs obtained at 20 weeks revealed 3 ligated group and one revascularization group proximal junction non-union. Failure of proximal fixation appeared to be the cause, demonstrated initially by a halo of bone resorption around proximal screws, seen as early as two weeks postoperatively. In these 4 animals all proximal screws were broken in 3 of the 4 pigs at 20 weeks. The 12 completely healed grafts had either no evidence of fixation problems (6), or changes insufficient to cause fixation failure (3 loose but not broken screws in 2 cases, 2 loose proximal screws in one case, 2 broken screws in one case and one broken screw in 2 instances) (Figure 6).

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

Examples typical 20-week postoperative radiographs. On the left, a patent AV bundle with union both proximally and distally, with intact fixation. On the right, a ligated control tibia demonstrating complete nonunion with loss of alignment, broken or loose proximal screws and loss of anatomic reduction at 20 weeks follow up. All proximal screws are either loose or broken

Bone healing scores were obtained on all final radiographs. The average total bone healing score at 20 weeks tended to be higher in the revascularized group compared to the ligated group (21.9 ±2.2 vs 18.9 ± 4.6, P=0.2), with more proximal callus remodeling in the revascularized group versus the ligated group at 20 weeks (3.7 ± 1.0 vs 2.6 ± 1.0, p=0.035).

Complications

There was loss of alignment due to proximal screw loosening in 9 pigs, including 6 ligated animals and 3 in the revascularization group. Despite this, bone apposition exceeded 50% contact in all cases and all but 4 ultimately united.

No wound infection or deep infections occurred in the five months of postoperative survival. In the clinical setting, infections occur in 9% to 30% of structural allograft implantation, generally within the first month postoperatively.2931 Our use of occlusive dressings and wound sealant played a role. Risks associated with tumor excision, radiation and/or chemotherapy were of course absent in our study. One initially patent AV-bundle was found to be thrombosed due to graft displacement. This pig was excluded from further analyses. This, loss of alignment and nonunions discussed above were the major complications observed in the 16 animals.

Discussion

Reconstruction of large segmental bone defects with cryopreserved allografts preserves limb function but often at the price of significant morbidity.18; 32 CBA’s may be closely matched to each defect, are readily available in bone banks and provide good immediate stability. Although freezing reduces immunogenicity,9 it also reduces osteogenic and osteoinductive capacity.33 Revitalization is limited primarily to the allograft/host junctions and periosteal surface.3437 CBAs resist infection poorly and have significant rates of nonunion, late stress fracture and mechanical failure.8; 29; 38; 39 Failure rates up to 60% at 10 years have been reported.7 These shortcomings might be overcome by surgically revascularizing the bone, permitting later active bone remodeling from circulation-derived cells.40 Implantation of AV bundles has been demonstrated in small animal models to not only improve cortical bone blood flow, but also formation of new bone .4144 Wrapping free vascularized autogenous periosteal flaps is another potential solution, although available sources are limited in size, and are used primarily to envelop small bones such as the clavicle with poor vascularity or segmental loss45.

Our data demonstrate that a patent AV bundle implanted within a large cryopreserved bone allograft does undergo angiogenesis, generating new intramedullary vessels that occupy a significantly greater proportion of the bone volume than controls, including ingrowth into endosteal cortical bone, seen on micro-CT angiography. Improved blood flow correlated with significantly greater endosteal allograft bone formation, as measured by quantitative histomorphometric parameters. The outer cortical bone of the allograft did not show similar bone formation rates. This is not unexpected, due to the intramedullary position of the AV bundle. Comparable studies of CBA revascularization in rat femora showed a higher capillary density and a higher mean cortical bone blood flow with AV bundle implantation.10; 11 In these small bones, revascularization occurred rapidly, without differences between 4 and 18 week time points11. In the same model, histomorphometry demonstrated higher bone formation rate in both endosteal and periosteal bone at16 weeks.44 It is reasonable to assume more time is required for a similar observable effect in a larger animal model.

Revascularization of allografts with periosteal sleeve preservation has also been demonstrated in a similar segmental swine tibial defect model.13 In this study, native periosteum was preserved when creating a segmental defect. This was used to envelop a matched allograft segment, with the addition of adipocyte-derived stem cells (ADSC) and bone morphogenic protein type 2 (BMP-2) placed in the medullary canal was tested in a second, otherwise identically-treated group. Both groups were found to heal faster than negative controls lacking periosteum or periosteum with ADSCx and BMP-2. Thus, periosteum served as source of both surgical angiogenesis and new bone formation on the cortical rather than endosteal surface.

Augmentation of surgical angiogenesis by gene therapy16; 46 or direct delivery of growth factors 15; 47 holds promise in small animal studies. Our porcine model closely approximates clinical scenarios, making it ideal for testing of such methodologies as a bridge to clinical practice. Delivery of blood flow by implantation of an AV-bundle or other vascularized tissue has proven beneficial in treating both avascular necrosis and non-union of small carpal bones clinically.22; 42; 4851 Structural allograft healing is accelerated in long bone segmental defects when combined with a vascularized fibular autograft, due to similar mechanisms. In several series, allografts without fibular flaps required 14 to 23 months to heal37; 5255. The addition of a vascularized fibula shortens the time to 6-9 months due in part to a similar enhancement of allograft viability 8, 5557. At 20 weeks, we did not see a significant difference in bone healing scores. It is likely that the survival time was simply too short to demonstrate a difference. A prolonged survival period using this same model would be one logical next step for further research.

There were no major complications in the postoperative period. There were two superficial stitch abscesses but no deep infections in any animal. In clinical setting infection rates between 9% and 30% have been reported.2931; 58 Dick et al reported a percentage of 13.3% deep infections of which 70% occurred within one month of initial surgery. The follow up time of five months in our study was sufficient to identify any potential deep infection. The discrepancy between conventional clinical outcomes and these study results might be due to the clinical setting, most commonly in primary bone tumors and trauma. Hernigou et al reported a higher risk of infection when adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation was applied.59 The use of occlusive dressings, wound sealant and absence of wound issues related to tumor biopsy or excision, radiation and chemotherapy likely contributed to the lack of any serious deep infection in our series.

Arteriovenous bundles may be ligated distally, as in our study, or reconnected distally as a flow-through pedicle. Thrombosis of ligated AV bundles is lower than a similarly occluded artery alone, and may be further improved by inclusion of adjacent connective tissue.60 Circulation is likely maintained by flow between small connecting vessels. Thrombosis was not a significant problem in our study. The single AV bundle that thrombosed was likely the result of damage from loss of bone reduction. The incidence of thrombosis varies widely in published studies. All rat saphenous AV bundles were patent at 16 weeks in one rat study10 and 85% patent in two others.11; 61 Kumta et al. had a patency rate of 50% of the femoral vascular bundle inserted in rat allografts with a follow up time of 6 and 12 weeks.62

We recognize certain limitations of our study. At 6 months age, our pigs were actively growing juveniles of manageable size. Mature pigs may have differed in outcome. Although a twenty weeks’ survival time is substantial, we found cortical bone formation to be incomplete. Subsequent studies with longer survival times would serve to test whether additional bone remodeling would occur in CBAs treated with surgical angiogenesis, or conversely demonstrate rates of stress fracture and reconstructive failures seen currently with cryopreserved structural allograft use.

Implant loosening and loss of alignment were due largely to the effect of immediate unrestricted weightbearing, necessary in the swine model. A single locked plate, precise allograft matching and an intact fibula, felt likely to provide adequate stability in the planning stages of the study, proved inadequate for some animals. We have subsequently changed our methods to include dual plating.

This large animal study of segmental tibial allograft reconstruction demonstrates that implantation of locally-available AV-bundles into cryopreserved allograft segment improves allograft intramedullary blood flow and promotes new bone formation. Future studies using this model to explore the means to augment the rate and extent of cortical angiogenesis using growth factors, gene therapy, stem cells or other therapy may provide the means to further improve outcomes. The study suggests similar methods applied in reconstructing segmental long bone defects clinically may serve to improve clinical outcomes in the future.

Acknowledgments:

The authors thank Mr Dennis Hanson from the Biomedical Imaging Resource lab, Mrs. Teresa Decklever from the Mayo Clinic Small Animal Imaging Core and Mr. James Herrick, Mr. Robert A. Brown and Mrs. Donna E. Jewison from the Bone Histomorphometry Laboratory at Mayo Clinic Rochester for their contributions for this work.

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number AR49718. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Benevenia J, Kirchner R, Patterson F, et al. 2016. Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:539–548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, et al. 2001. Factors affecting nonunion of the allograft-host junction. Clin Orthop Relat Res:87–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Damron TA, Sim FH, Shives TC, et al. 1996. Intercalary spacers in the treatment of segmentally destructive diaphyseal humeral lesions in disseminated malignancies. Clin Orthop Relat Res:233–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schurmann M, Gradl G, Andress HJ, et al. 2000. Metastatic lesions of the humerus treated with the isoelastic diaphysis prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res:204–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Han CS, Wood MB, Bishop AT, et al. 1992. Vascularized bone transfer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:1441–1449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weichman KE, Dec W, Morris CD, et al. 2015. Lower Extremity Osseous Oncologic Reconstruction with Composite Microsurgical Free Fibula Inside Massive Bony Allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:396–403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wheeler DL, Enneking WF. 2005. Allograft bone decreases in strength in vivo over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res:36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, et al. 1996. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res:86–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Graham SM, Leonidou A, Aslam-Pervez N, et al. 2010. Biological therapy of bone defects: the immunology of bone allo-transplantation. Expert Opin Biol Ther 10:885–901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Willems WF, Kremer T, Friedrich P, et al. 2012. Surgical revascularization induces angiogenesis in orthotopic bone allograft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:2496–2502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Willems WF, Larsen M, Friedrich PF, et al. 2012. Induction of angiogenesis and osteogenesis in surgically revascularized frozen bone allografts by sustained delivery of FGF-2 and VEGF. J Orthop Res 30:1556–1562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pelzer M, Larsen M, Friedrich PF, et al. 2009. Repopulation of vascularized bone allotransplants with recipient-derived cells: detection by laser capture microdissection and real-time PCR. J Orthop Res 27:1514–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Runyan CM, Vu AT, Rumburg A, et al. 2015. Repair of a Critical Porcine Tibial Defect by Means of Allograft Revitalization. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:461e–473e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mattar T, Friedrich PF, Bishop AT. 2013. Effect of rhBMP-2 and VEGF in a vascularized bone allotransplant experimental model based on surgical neoangiogenesis. J Orthop Res 31:561–566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Larsen M, Willems WF, Pelzer M, et al. 2014. Fibroblast growth factor-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor mediated augmentation of angiogenesis and bone formation in vascularized bone allotransplants. Microsurgery 34:301–307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Katsube K, Bishop AT, Simari RD, et al. 2005. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transfer enhances surgical revascularization of necrotic bone. J Orthop Res 23:469–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Laiblin C, Jaeschke G. 1979. [Clinical chemistry examinations of bone and muscle metabolism under stress in the Gottingen miniature pig--an experimental study]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 92:124–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mathes DW, Randolph MA, Bourget JL, et al. 2002. Recipient bone marrow engraftment in donor tissue after long-term tolerance to a composite tissue allograft. Transplantation 73:1880–1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ren X, Shirbacheh MV, Ustuner ET, et al. 2000. Osteomyocutaneous flap as a preclinical composite tissue allograft: swine model. Microsurgery 20:143–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ustuner ET, Majzoub RK, Ren X, et al. 2000. Swine composite tissue allotransplant model for preclinical hand transplant studies. Microsurgery 20:400–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Villamaria CY, Rasmussen TE, Spencer JR, et al. 2012. Microvascular porcine model for the optimization of vascularized composite tissue transplantation. J Surg Res 178:452–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vossen M, Edelstein J, Majzoub RK, et al. 2005. Bone quality and healing in a swine vascularized bone allotransplantation model using cyclosporine-based immunosuppression therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:529–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Isobe M, Suzuki J, Yamazaki S, et al. 1996. Acceptance of primary skin graft after treatment with anti-intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and anti-leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 monoclonal antibodies in mice. Transplantation 62:411–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Giessler GA, Zobitz M, Friedrich PF, et al. 2008. Transplantation of a vascularized rabbit femoral diaphyseal segment: mechanical and histologic properties of a new living bone transplantation model. Microsurgery 28:291–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Taira H, Moreno J, Ripalda P, et al. 2004. Radiological and histological analysis of cortical allografts: an experimental study in sheep femora. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:320–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zagorchev L, Oses P, Zhuang ZW, et al. 2010. Micro computed tomography for vascular exploration. J Angiogenes Res 2:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hauge E, Mosekilde L, Melsen F. 1999. Missing observations in bone histomorphometry on osteoporosis: implications and suggestions for an approach. Bone 25:389–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dempster DW, Compston JE, Drezner MK, et al. 2013. Standardized nomenclature, symbols, and units for bone histomorphometry: a 2012 update of the report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 28:2–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dick HM, Strauch RJ. 1994. Infection of massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop Relat Res:46–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aponte-Tinao LA, Ritacco LE, Albergo JI, et al. 2014. The principles and applications of fresh frozen allografts to bone and joint reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am 45:257–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gebhardt MC, Flugstad DI, Springfield DS, et al. 1991. The use of bone allografts for limb salvage in high-grade extremity osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res:181–196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Friedrich JB, Moran SL, Bishop AT, et al. 2008. Free vascularized fibular graft salvage of complications of long-bone allograft after tumor reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:93–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. 2005. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 36 Suppl 3:S20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Braun C 1992. Autogenously vascularised bone allografts. Experimental model of a new bone-muscle composite graft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111:250–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Stevenson S, Li XQ, Martin B. 1991. The fate of cancellous and cortical bone after transplantation of fresh and frozen tissue-antigen-matched and mismatched osteochondral allografts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1143–1156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Enneking WF, Mindell ER. 1991. Observations on massive retrieved human allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1123–1142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bauer TW, Muschler GF. 2000. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res:10–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H. 1980. Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1039–1058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.de Boer HH, Wood MB. 1989. Bone changes in the vascularised fibular graft. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:374–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pelzer M, Larsen M, Friedrich PF, et al. 2009. Repopulation of vascularized bone allotransplants with recipient-derived cells: detection by laser capture microdissection and real-time PCR. J Orthop Res 27:1514–1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dickerson RC. 1966. The diversion of arterial blood flow to growing bone. Surg Gynecol Obstet 123:103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hori Y, Tamai S, Okuda H, et al. 1979. Blood vessel transplantation to bone. J Hand Surg Am 4:23–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Larsen M, Willems WF, Pelzer M, et al. 2010. Augmentation of surgical angiogenesis in vascularized bone allotransplants with host-derived a/v bundle implantation, fibroblast growth factor-2, and vascular endothelial growth factor administration. J Orthop Res 28:1015–1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Willems WF, Kremer T, Friedrich P, et al. 2014. Surgical revascularization in structural orthotopic bone allograft increases bone remodeling. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:2870–2877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fuchs B, Steinmann SP, Bishop AT. 2005. Free vascularized corticoperiosteal bone graft for the treatment of persistent nonunion of the clavicle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14:264–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rezaie ES, Visser NJ, Friedrich PF, et al. 2017. Intra-luminal gene therapy in the porcine artery using a recombinant adeno-associated virus 9. Gene. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Suzuki O, Bishop AT, Sunagawa T, et al. 2004. VEGF-promoted surgical angiogenesis in necrotic bone. Microsurgery 24:85–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Aibinder WR, Wagner ER, Bishop AT, et al. 2017. Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Nonunions: Is Free Vascularized Bone Grafting Superior for Scaphoid Nonunion? Hand (New York, NY):1558944717736397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kakar S, Giuffre JL, Shin AY. 2011. Revascularization procedures for Kienbock disease. Techniques in hand & upper extremity surgery 15:55–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Moran SL, Cooney WP, Berger RA, et al. 2005. The use of the 4 + 5 extensor compartmental vascularized bone graft for the treatment of Kienbock’s disease. J Hand Surg Am 30:50–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Moran SL, Shin AY. 2007. Vascularized bone grafting for the treatment of carpal pathology. Orthop Clin North Am 38:73–85, vi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aho AJ, Ekfors T, Dean PB, et al. 1994. Incorporation and clinical results of large allografts of the extremities and pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res:200–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Donati D, Di Liddo M, Zavatta M, et al. 2000. Massive bone allograft reconstruction in high-grade osteosarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res:186–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kerry RM, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, et al. 1999. The biology of bone grafting. Instructional course lectures 48:645–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Moran SL, Shin AY, Bishop AT. 2006. The use of massive bone allograft with intramedullary free fibular flap for limb salvage in a pediatric and adolescent population. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:413–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brigman BE, Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, et al. 2004. Allografts about the Knee in Young Patients with High-Grade Sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res:232–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Manfrini M, Vanel D, De Paolis M, et al. 2004. Imaging of vascularized fibula autograft placed inside a massive allograft in reconstruction of lower limb bone tumors. AJR American journal of roentgenology 182:963–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tomford WW, Thongphasuk J, Mankin HJ, et al. 1990. Frozen musculoskeletal allografts. A study of the clinical incidence and causes of infection associated with their use. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1137–1143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hernigou P, Delepine G, Goutallier D. 1991. [Infections after massive bone allografts in surgery of bone tumors of the limbs. Incidence, contributing factors, therapeutic problems]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77:6–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nagi ON. 2005. Revascularization of diaphyseal bone segments by vascular bundle implantation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Willems WF, Larsen M, Giusti G, et al. 2011. Revascularization and bone remodeling of frozen allografts stimulated by intramedullary sustained delivery of FGF-2 and VEGF. J Orthop Res 29:1431–1436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kumta S, Yip K, Roy N, et al. 1996. Revascularisation of bone allografts following vascular bundle implantation: an experimental study in rats. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:206–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES