Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Toxicology logoLink to Journal of Medical Toxicology
. 2019 Oct 22;15(4):228–254. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00736-9

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry-the 2018 Annual Report

Meghan B Spyres 1,, Lynn A Farrugia 2, A Min Kang 3,4, Diane P Calello 5, Sharan L Campleman 6, Anthony Pizon 7, Timothy Wiegand 8, Louise Kao 9, Brad D Riley 10, Shao Li 6, Paul M Wax 11, Jeffery Brent 12; On behalf of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Study Group
PMCID: PMC6825068  PMID: 31642014

Abstract

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Registry was established by the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT) in 2010. The Registry collects data from participating sites with the agreement that all bedside medical toxicology consultation will be entered. The objective of this ninth annual report is to summarize the Registry’s 2018 data and activity with its additional 7043 cases. Cases were identified for inclusion in this report by a query of the ToxIC database for any case entered from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Detailed data was collected from these cases and aggregated to provide information which included demographics, reason for medical toxicology evaluation, agent and agent class, clinical signs and symptoms, treatments and antidotes administered, mortality, and whether life support was withdrawn. A total of 51.5% of cases were female, 48% were male, and 0.6% transgender. Non-opioid analgesics were the most commonly reported agent class, followed by antidepressants and opioids. Acetaminophen was once again the most common agent reported. There were 106 fatalities, comprising 1.5% of all registry cases. Major trends in demographics and exposure characteristics remained similar to past years’ reports. Sub-analyses were conducted to describe exposures in elderly patients, addiction consultation practices, and risk factors for bupropion-induced seizures. The launch of the ToxIC Qualified Clinical Data Registry (TQCDR) is also described.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13181-019-00736-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Poisoning, Overdose, Surveillance, Epidemiology, Medical Toxicology

Introduction

The year 2018, the ninth full year of operation of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC), was again marked by a number of notable achievements and continued robust data collection. This report summarizes the major aspect of data collected over the year. Major changes and achievements are described in this section of the Report.

In 2018, ToxIC had 40 active sites composed of 73 facilities. A total of 7043 new cases were enrolled. This brings the total number of cases in the ToxIC database accumulated since the Consortium started in 2010, to 66248 by December 31, 2018.

There were 17 new studies proposed by ToxIC investigators in 2018, of which 13 were approved. These new studies were:

  1. Risk Factors for Serotonin Syndrome Secondary to Bupropion Overdoses as Reported in the ToxIC Registry

  2. Co-exposure to Ethanol and Drugs of Abuse Among Adolescents (10-18): Variation in Clinical Characteristics among Events Presenting to Hospital by Race/Hispanic Ethnicity

  3. Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) Use Resulting in Hospitalization-Common Reported Co-Ingestion and Clinical Characteristics

  4. Association of Seizures in Tramadol Overdoses Treated with Naloxone: A Report from the ToxIC Registry

  5. Inpatient methadone poisoning trends in the US

  6. Marine Envenomations Reported to ToxIC

  7. Use of octreotide by medical toxicologists in poisoned patients with all-cause hypoglycemia

  8. Protective Effects of Benzodiazepines in Overdose

  9. Comparison of adverse events between medications in SNRI overdose and clinical features associated with seizures

  10. Predictors of poisoning severity in single substance diphenhydramine overdoses

  11. Polypharmacy among elderly patients reported to the Toxicology Investigators Consortium

  12. ToxIC QCDR-The First 6 months

  13. Update on prior study of infant poisonings

There were 13 published abstracts from ToxIC presented at various meetings, bringing the total number of published abstracts produced to 120. There were two new full publications from ToxIC in 2018, bringing the total number of papers published since 2010 to 34. These abstracts and publications are listed on the ToxIC website (https://ToxICRegistry.org).

Year 2018 brought the first full year of ToxIC being the vehicle for medical toxicologists to document their compliance with practice quality metrics. Some preliminary information regarding the data collected on these metrics is provided in this annual report.

In addition to the overall summary of ToxIC data presented herein, we present three short sub-analyses that highlight contemporary interest. Because of the prominence of bupropion-induced seizures in current practice we present a more focused view on their occurrence. Similarly, with the consequences of the ever-present opioid epidemic being front and center of medical toxicology practice, and the concomitant rise of addition medicine services provided by medical toxicologists, we are providing our first look at this aspect of our practice. Finally, the third sub-analysis reviews our new ToxIC Qualified Clinical Data Registry.

In October 2018, ToxIC partnered with the National Drug Early Warning System (NDEWS) to develop a capability to identify emerging drugs and drug trends encountered by medical toxicologists during patient consultations and toxicology evaluations. NDEWS monitors emerging drug use trends from a number of sources including medical examiners, the DEA, and regional epidemiologists and disseminates this information through their website and a variety of publications. Reports about new and emerging exposures cared for by ToxIC investigators will now be disseminated in part through NDEWS as part of their ToxIC Briefs. The first two ToxIC Briefs were published in late 2018:

  • Issue 1: Overview of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium and ToxIC Brief

  • Issue 2: Novel Synthetic Opioids Cases Reported to the ToxIC Registry, August–October 2018.

ToxIC continues to be supported by funds from the US National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration, and a corporate contract with BTG International.

Ongoing investigator-initiated research projects can be found on the ToxIC website.

This ninth ToxIC Annual Report summarizes the main points of the data collected in our main Registry in 2018. Data from the sub-Registries are published separately.

Methods

The procedures and methods for the data collection in the ToxIC Registry have been described in detail [1]. One major change in ToxIC’s operating procedures in 2018 was the recruitment of an additional full time staff member to enhance our Quality Assurance program. Currently, all new ToxIC entries are scrutinized in detail and any inconsistences or missing fields are now quickly clarified by communication with the ToxIC investigator entering the case.

Agent entries in primary tables were included for substances with four or more occurrences. Agents with fewer occurrences were listed together under ‘miscellaneous.’

The ToxIC Registry operates pursuant to review by the Western Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the IRBs of participating sites.

Results

In 2018, there were a total of 7043 cases reporting toxicologic exposures to the ToxIC Registry. This is a decrease from the prior 6 years as several sub-optimally performing sites were discontinued. Table 1 lists all individual sites that contributed cases in 2018.

Table 1.

Participating institutions providing cases to ToxIC in 2018

Arizona

Phoenix

  Banner- University Medical Center Phoenix

  Phoenix Children's Hospital

California

Loma Linda

  Loma Linda University Medical Center

Los Angeles

  Keck Medical Center of USC

  University of Southern California Verdugo Hills

Sacramento

  University of California Davis Medical Center

San Diego

  Rady Children's Hospital

  Scripps Mercy Hospital

  University of California San Diego-Hillcrest

San Francisco

  San Francisco General Hospital

Colorado

Denver

  Colorado Children’s Hospital

  Denver Health Medical Center

  Porter and Littleton Hospital

  Swedish Hospital

  University of Colorado Medical Center

Connecticut

Hartford

  Hartford Hospital

Georgia

Atlanta

  Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Egelston

  Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Hughes Spalding

  Emory University Hospital

  Grady Health System

  Grady Memorial Hospital

Illinois

Evanston

  Evanston North Shore University Health System

Indiana

Indianapolis

  IU-Eskenazi Hospital

  IU-Indiana University Hospital

  IU-Methodist Hospital-Indianapolis

  IU-Riley Hospital for Children

Kentucky

Lexington

  University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center

Massachusetts

Boston

  Beth Israel Boston

  Boston Children's Hospital

Worcester

  University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center

Michigan

Grand Rapids

  Spectrum Health Hospitals

Missouri

Kansas City

  Children's Mercy Hospitals & Clinics

St. Louis

  Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis

Nebraska

Omaha

  University of Nebraska Medical Center

New Jersey

New Brunswick

  Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

Newark

  NJMS/Rutgers

New Mexico

Albuquerque

  University of New Mexico

New York

Albany

  Albany Medical Center

New York

  Bellevue Medical Center

  NYU Langone Medical Center

Staten Island

  Staten Island University Hospital

Rochester

  Highland Hospital

  Strong Memorial Hospital

Syracuse

  Upstate Medical University-Downtown Campus

North Carolina

Charlotte

  Carolinas Medical Center

Ohio

Cleveland

  Cleveland VA Medical Center

Oregon

Portland

  Doernbecher Children's Hospital

  Oregon Health & Science University Hospital

Pennsylvania

Allentown

  Lehigh Valley Hospital Cedar Crest

  Lehigh Valley Hospital Muhlenberg

  Lehigh Valley-17th Street

Philadelphia

  Hahnemann University Hospital

  Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital

  Mercy Hospital of Philadelphia

  St. Christopher's Hospital for Children

Pittsburgh

  UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

  UPMC Magee Women's Hospital

  UPMC Mercy Hospital

  UPMC Presbyterian/Shadyside

South Carolina

Greenville

  Vidant Medical Center

Texas

Dallas

  Children's Medical Center Dallas

  Parkland Memorial Hospital

  University of Texas Southwestern Clinic

  William P Clements University Hospital

Houston

  Ben Taub General Hospital

  Texas Children's Hospital

Utah

Salt Lake City

  Primary Children's Hospital

  University of Utah Hospital

Virginia

Charlottesville

  University of Virginia Health Systems

Richmond

  Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center

Wisconsin

Milwaukee

  Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

Israel

Haifa

  Rambam Health Care Campus

Thailand

Bangkok

  Vajira Hospital

Demographics

Tables 2 and 3 summarize selective demographics including age and gender and race and ethnicity, respectively. In 2018, 51.5% of cases involved female patients, 0.6% involved transgender patients (23 female-to-male, 17 male-to-female, 1 unknown). Sixty-eight patients (1%) were pregnant. Age distribution was similar to previous years [1, 2]. The majority of patients were adults aged 19–65 (61.0%) followed by adolescents aged 13–18 (20.3%). Children (< 12 years of age) made up 12.5% of cases.

Table 2.

ToxIC case demographics—age and gender

N (%)
Gender
  Male 3377 (47.9)
  Female 3624 (51.5)
  Transgender
  Female to Male 23 (0.3)
  Male to Female 17 (0.2)
  Transgender unspecified 1 (< 0.1)
  Unknown 1 (< 0.1)
Pregnant 68 (1.0)
Age (years)
 < 2 276 (3.9)
  2–6 385 (5.5)
  7–12 218 (3.1)
  13–18 1427 (20.3)
  19–65 4293 (61.0)
  66–89 401 (5.7)
 > 89 18 (0.3)
  Unknown 25 (0.4)
Total 7043 (100)

Table 3.

ToxIC case demographics—race and Hispanic ethnicity

N (%)
Race
  Caucasian 4053 (57.5)
  Unknown/uncertain 1495 (21.2)
  Black/African 915 (13.0)
  Asian 269 (3.8)
  Mixed 208 (3.0)
  American Indian/Alaska Native 73 (1.0)
  Other 20 (0.3)
  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 7 (0.1)
  Blank 3 (< 0.1)
  Total 7043 (100)
Hispanic ethnicitya
  Hispanic 813 (11.5)
  Non-Hispanic 4717 (67.0)
  Unknown 1513 (21.5)
  Total 7043 (100)

aHispanic ethnicity as indicated exclusive of race

One case not recorded as Hispanic or non-Hispanic ethnicity

The most commonly reported race was Caucasian (57.5%), followed by Black/African (13.0%) and Asian (3.8%). Race was reported as unknown/uncertain in 21.2% of cases, similar to the previous 2 years [1, 2]. Hispanic ethnicity was reported in 11.5% of cases, and 21.5% of cases reported ethnicity as unknown/uncertain. Race and ethnicity are self-reported by patients, or in cases in which a patient is unable to report, it may be reported by the examining medical toxicologist to the best of their ability.

Table 4 details the referral source of inpatient and outpatient medical toxicology encounters. The majority (58.0%) of inpatient cases were generated by the Emergency Department, and very few cases (0.3%) were referred from Poison Centers. Outpatient encounters were primarily referred by primary care and other outpatient physicians (65.9%), followed by self-referrals (11.6%). These trends were similar to previous years; however, the overall percent of self-referrals decreased by more than half this year compared to recent years [1, 2].

Table 4.

ToxIC registry case referral sources by inpatient/outpatient status

N (%)
Emergency Department (ED) or inpatient (IP)a
  ED 3937 (58.0)
  Admitting service 1807 (26.6)
  Outside hospital transfer 565 (8.3)
  Request from another hospital service (not ED) 365 (5.4)
  Self-referral 88 (1.3)
  Poison Center 17 (0.3)
  Primary care provider or other outpatient treating physician 5 (0.1)
  Employer/Independent medical evaluation 1 (< 0.1)
  ED/IP total 6785 (100)
Outpatient (OP)/clinic/office consultationb
  Primary care provider or other OP physician 170 (65.9)
  Self-referral 30 (11.6)
  Employer/Independent medical evaluation 26 (10.1)
  Poison Center 12 (4.7)
  ED 11 (4.3)
  Admitting service 4 (1.6)
  Request from another hospital service (not ED) 4 (1.6)
  Outside hospital transfer 1 (0.4)
  OP total 258 (100)

aPercentage based on the total number of cases (N = 6785) seen by a medical toxicologist as consultant (ED or IP) or as attending (IP)

bPercentage based on the total number of cases (N = 258) seen by a medical toxicologist as outpatient, clinic visit, or office consultation

Tables 5 and 6 describe the reason for the toxicology encounter and the details of intentional pharmaceutical exposures, respectively. Consistent with previous years [1, 2], intentional pharmaceutical exposures were the most common reason for medical toxicology encounters (52.4%). Addiction medicine consult was a new reason for encounter in 2018 (2.7%). Within the intentional pharmaceutical exposures, the majority of cases were again an attempt at self-harm (66.7%), primarily suicide attempts (86.1%).

Table 5.

Reason for medical toxicology encounter

N (%)
Intentional exposure-pharmaceutical 3690 (52.4)
Intentional exposure-non-pharmaceutical 775 (11.0)
Unintentional exposure-pharmaceutical 587 (8.3)
Unintentional exposure-non-pharmaceutical 319 (4.5)
Organ system dysfunction 318 (4.5)
Envenomation-snake 239 (3.4)
Addiction medicine consultation 190 (2.7)
Withdrawal-ethanol 167 (2.4)
Withdrawal-opioid 165 (2.3)
Interpretation of toxicology lab data 131 (1.9)
Environmental evaluation 115 (1.6)
Ethanol abuse 89 (1.2)
Occupational evaluation 84 (1.2)
Withdrawal-sedative/hypnotic 47 (0.7)
Envenomation-spider 41 (0.6)
Malicious/criminal 32 (0.5)
Envenomation-other 19 (0.3)
Blank 13 (0.2)
Withdrawal-other 11 (0.2)
Envenomation-scorpion 6 (0.1)
Marine/fish poisoning 3 (< 0.1)
Withdrawal-cocaine/amphetamine 2 (< 0.1)
Total 7043 (100)

Table 6.

Detailed reason for encounter-intentional pharmaceutical exposure

N (%)
Reason for intentional pharmaceutical exposure subgroupa
  Attempt at self-harm 2463 (66.7)
  Misuse/abuse 627 (17.0)
  Therapeutic use 291 (7.9)
  Unknown 309 (8.4)
  Total 3690 (100)
Attempt at self-harm- suicidal intent subclassificationb
  Suicidal intent 2121 (86.1)
  Suicidal intent unknown 253 (10.3)
  No suicidal intent 85 (3.5)
  Not recorded 4 (0.2)
  Total 2463 (100)

aPercentage of total number of cases (N = 3690) indicating primary reason for encounter due to intentional pharmaceutical exposure

bPercentage of number of cases indicating attempt at self-harm (N = 2463)

Agent Classes

In 2018, of the 7043 cases entered into the ToxIC Registry, 1949 (27.7%) cases involved multiple agents for a total of 9305 individual agent entries. Consistent with previous years [1, 2], the non-opioid analgesic class was the most common (15.2%), followed by the antidepressant (11.4%), opioid (10.9%), and sedative hypnotic/muscle relaxant (8.6%) classes. Table 7 details the contribution of each agent class to the Registry. Photosensitizing agents represented a new class in 2018 with 1 entry (0%).

Table 7.

Agent classes involved in medical toxicology consultation

N (%)a
Analgesic 1411 (15.2)
Antidepressant 1057 (11.4)
Opioid 1010 (10.9)
Sedative-hypnotic/muscle relaxant 803 (8.6)
Anticholinergic/antihistamine 608 (6.5)
Sympathomimetic 581 (6.2)
Ethanol 568 (6.1)
Cardiovascular 561 (6.0)
Antipsychotic 440 (4.7)
Anticonvulsant 325 (3.5)
Envenomation and marine 274 (2.9)
Psychoactive 260 (2.8)
Diabetic medication 141 (1.5)
Cough and cold products 116 (1.2)
Lithium 112 (1.2)
Gases/irritants/vapors/dusts 111 (1.2)
Herbal products/dietary supplements 110 (1.2)
Metals 101 (1.1)
Hydrocarbon 73 (0.8)
Caustic 70 (0.8)
Household products 65 (0.7)
Antimicrobials 63 (0.7)
Plants and fungi 58 (0.6)
Unknown 52 (0.6)
GI 39 (0.4)
Anticoagulant 31 (0.3)
Endocrine 25 (0.3)
Chemotherapeutic and immune 24 (0.3)
Other nonpharmaceutical product 24 (0.3)
Other pharmaceutical product 24 (0.3)
Anesthetic 23 (0.2)
Insecticide 21 (0.2)
Rodenticide 11 (0.1)
Anti-parkinsonism drugs 9 (0.1)
Herbicide 7 (0.1)
Ingested foreign body 6 (0.1)
Pulmonary 6 (0.1)
Amphetamine-like hallucinogen 5 (0.1)
WMDb/riot agent/radiological 5 (0.1)
Fungicide 3 (< 0.1)
Photosensitizing agent 1 (< 0.1)
Unknown agent 62 (0.6)
Total 9305 (100)

aPercentages are out of total number of reported agent entries in 2018; 1949 cases (27.7%) reported multiple agents

bWMD weapons of mass destruction

Elderly Agent Classes

Table 8 presents the agent classes by age group for older adults. There were 329 cases (4.7%) reporting 509 individual agents of exposure in adults > 65 years of age. A total of 113 (34.3%) cases had more than one agent reported. There were 187 (56.8%) women and no transgender cases reported. The top three agent classes were cardiovascular (14.5%), analgesic (12.4%), and sedative hypnotic/muscle relaxant (10.0%). By age category, the most common exposures by agent class were analgesics for adults 66–75 years of age, and cardiovascular for adults both 76–85 and > 85 years of age. A total of 22.9% of agents reported in adults > 85 years of age were cardiovascular drugs. Also, significant in adults > 85 years of age was the sedative hypnotic/muscle relaxant class, responsible for 16.7% of agents reported and the second most common category in this group. Ethanol was the 7th most common agent (7.4%) for adults 66–75 years of age but was not responsible for any cases reported in adults over 75.

Table 8.

ToxIC 2018–Agent classes for older adult cases

Exposure rank Totals %a Age 66–75 Age 76–85 Age > 85
Cardiovascular 1 74 14.5% 37 26 11
Analgesic 2 63 12.4% 38 18 7
Sedative-hypnotic/muscle relaxant 3 51 10.0% 31 12 8
Antidepressant 4 45 8.8% 19 21 5
Opioid 5 43 8.4% 32 7 4
Diabetic Med 6 26 5.1% 15 10 1
Ethanol 7 24 4.7% 24 0 0
Anticholinergic/antihistamine 8 20 3.9% 12 5 3
Envenomation 8 20 3.9% 13 6 1
Antipsychotic 9 16 3.1% 13 3 0
Anticonvulsant 10 13 2.6% 11 2 0
Metals 11 11 2.2% 7 3 1
Toxic alcohols 12 10 2.0% 9 1 0
Antimicrobials 13 9 1.8% 7 2 0
Sympathomimetic 13 9 1.8% 8 1 0
Caustic 14 7 1.4% 6 0 1
Lithium 14 7 1.4% 5 2 0
Anticoagulant 13 6 1.2% 2 3 1
Gases/vapors/irritants/dusts 13 6 1.2% 5 1 0
Household 13 6 1.2% 5 1 0
Other pharmaceutical 12 5 1.0% 4 0 1
Parkinson’s Med 12 5 1.0% 1 3 1
Plants/fungi 12 5 1.0% 2 3 0
Anesthetic 11 4 0.8% 2 1 1
GI agent 10 3 0.6% 3 0 0
Hydrocarbon 10 3 0.6% 3 0 0
Other nonpharmaceuticals 10 3 0.6% 2 1 0
Unknown class 10 3 0.6% 2 1 0
Chemotherapeutic and immune 9 2 0.4% 0 1 1
Endocrine 9 2 0.4% 2 0 0
Herbals/dietary supplements/vitamins 9 2 0.4% 2 0 0
Psychoactive 9 2 0.4% 0 2 0
Cough and cold 8 1 0.2% 1 0 0
Herbicide 8 1 0.2% 1 0 0
Insecticide 8 1 0.2% 0 0 1
Pulmonary 8 1 0.2% 1 0 0
Totals 509 100.0%

aPercentages are out of total number of reported agent entries per year; 113 cases (34.3%) reported multiple agents

Tables 9 and 10 present cases involving elderly adults by intent of exposure. Intentional pharmaceutical exposures (52.3%), followed by unintentional pharmaceutical (11.9%), and intentional non-pharmaceutical (6.1%) exposures were the most common reasons for encounters. Within the intentional pharmaceutical group, attempt at self-harm (41.9%) and therapeutic use (34.9%) were both common. A total of 21.4% of intentional pharmaceutical encounters in the cardiovascular class were due to therapeutic use.

Table 9.

Reason for medical toxicology encounter older adults

N (%)
Intentional exposure-pharmaceutical 172 (52.3)
Unintentional exposure-pharmaceutical 39 (11.9)
Intentional exposure–non-pharmaceutical 20 (6.1)
Envenomation-snake 17 (5.2)
Organ system dysfunction 17 (5.2)
Unintentional exposure-non-pharmaceutical 14 (4.3)
Environmental evaluation 12 (3.6)
Withdrawal-ethanol 9 (2.7)
Interpretation of toxicology lab data 8 (2.4)
Addiction medicine consultation 6 (1.8)
Withdrawal-opioids 5 (1.5)
Ethanol abuse 3 (0.9)
Envenomation-other 1 (0.3)
Envenomation-scorpion 1 (0.3)
Envenomation-spider 1 (0.3)
Malicious/criminal 1 (0.3)
Occupational evaluation 1 (0.3)
Withdrawal-other 1 (0.3)
Withdrawal–sedative hypnotics 1 (0.3)
Total 329 (100)
Table 10.

Detailed reason for encounter-intentional pharmaceutical exposure in older adults

N (%)
Reason for intentional pharmaceutical exposure subgroupa
  Attempt at self-harm 72 (41.9)
  Therapeutic use 60 (34.9)
  Misuse/abuse 24 (14.0)
  Unknown 16 (9.3)
  Total 172 (100)
Attempt at self-harm- suicidal intent subclassificationb
  Suicidal intent 60 (83.3)
  Suicidal intent unknown 11 (15.3)
  No suicidal intent 1 (1.4)
  Total 72 (100)

aPercentage of total number of cases (N = 172) indicating primary reason for encounter due to intentional pharmaceutical exposure

bPercentage of number of cases indicating attempt at self-harm (N = 72)

Individual Agents by Class

Analgesics

Table 11 presents the non-opioid analgesics, the largest class in the Registry. Acetaminophen was again the most commonly reported agent (58.2%), followed by ibuprofen (12.9%), and aspirin (11.7%). Ibuprofen overtook aspirin as the second most commonly reported agent for the first time this year [18]. Gabapentin and pregabalin together made up 11% of the class.

Table 11.

Analgesics

N (%)
Acetaminophen 821 (58.2)
Ibuprofen 182 (12.9)
Aspirin 165 (11.7)
Gabapentin 134 (9.5)
Naproxen 36 (2.6)
Pregabalin 21 (1.5)
Salicylic acid 21 (1.5)
Analgesic unspecified 11 (0.8)
Meloxicam 6 (0.4)
Miscellaneousa 14 (1.0)
Class total 1411 (100)

aIncludes aminophenazone, etodolac, diclofenac, methylsalicylate, phenazopyridine, salsalate, and unspecified NSAID

Antidepressants

Table 12 describes the antidepressant class. The other antidepressant category, driven primarily by bupropion (23.2%) and trazodone (13.6%), was the most frequent category among the antidepressants, similar to previous years [1, 2]. Frequency in reporting of SSRIs, TCAs, and SNRIs was also consistent with previous years’ trends [1, 2].

Table 12.

Antidepressants

N (%)
Other antidepressants 452 (42.8)
  Bupropion 245 (23.2)
  Trazodone 144 (13.6)
  Mirtazapine 31 (2.9)
  Antidepressant unspecified 23 (2.2)
  Vilazodone 5 (0.5)
  Miscellaneousa < 5 (< 0.4)
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) 380 (36.0)
  Sertraline 130 (12.3)
  Fluoxetine 95 (9.0)
  Escitalopram 69 (6.5)
  Citalopram 64 (6.1)
  Miscellaneousb < 5 (< 0.4)
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) 123 (11.6)
  Amitriptyline 81 (7.7)
  Doxepin 21 (2.0)
  Nortriptyline 17 (1.6)
  Miscellaneousc < 5 (< 0.4)
Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) 102 (9.6)
  Venlafaxine 67 (6.3)
  Duloxetine 31 (2.9)
  Miscellaneousd < 5 (< 0.4)
  Class total 1057 (100)

aIncludes vortioxetine, tranylcypromine

bIncludes fluvoxamine

cIncludes imipramine, clomipramine, desipramine

dIncludes desvenlafaxine

Opioids

Table 13 describes the opioid class. Heroin was again the most common agent in the class, with its contribution increasing to 37.9% in 2018, up from 28.9% in 2017 [1]. Fentanyl was the third most common agent, making up 10.1% of the class, also increased from 2017. Other opioid agents remained fairly stable compared to prior years.

Table 13.

Opioids

N (%)
Heroin 383 (37.9)
Oxycodone 125 (12.4)
Fentanyl 102 (10.1)
Tramadol 82 (8.1)
Buprenorphine 62 (6.1)
Methadone 57 (5.6)
Opioid unspecified 57 (5.6)
Hydrocodone 46 (4.6)
Morphine 31 (3.1)
Loperamide 12 (1.2)
Hydromorphone 11 (1.1)
Codeine 10 (1.0)
Naloxone 9 (0.9)
Miscellaneousa 23 (2.3)
Class total 1010 (100)

aIncludes acetyl fentanyl, butorphanol, depropionylfentanyl, diphenoxylate, fluoroisobutyryl fentanyl (4- or para-), methyl norfentanyl, N-allyl norfentanyl, naltrexone, norfentanyl, oxymorphone, remifentanil, tapentadol, U47700

Sedative Hypnotics

Table 14 presents the sedative hypnotic/muscle relaxant class. Benzodiazepines (primarily alprazolam (21.0%) and clonazepam (15.1%)) and muscle relaxants (primarily baclofen (11.2%) and cyclobenzaprine (10.7%)) were the most common subtypes, similar to previous years [1, 2]. Z-drugs, other sedatives, and barbiturates were again less common.

Table 14.

Sedative-hypnotic/muscle relaxants by type

N (%)
Benzodiazepines 426 (53.1)
  Alprazolam 169 (21.0)
  Clonazepam 121 (15.1)
  Lorazepam 60 (7.5)
  Benzodiazepine unspecified 29 (3.6)
  Diazepam 29 (3.6)
  Chlordiazepoxide 7 (0.9)
  Temazepam 6 (0.7)
  Miscellaneousa 5 (0.6)
Muscle Relaxants 234 (29.1)
  Baclofen 90 (11.2)
  Cyclobenzaprine 86 (10.7)
  Tizanidine 28 (3.5)
  Carisoprodol 16 (2.0)
  Methocarbamol 10 (1.2)
  Miscellaneousb 4 (0.5)
Non-benzodiazepine agonists (“Z” drugs) 59 (7.3)
  Zolpidem 51 (6.4)
  Eszopiclone 6 (0.7)
  Zaleplon 2 (0.2)
Other sedatives 58 (7.2)
  Buspirone 24 (3.0)
  Sed-hypnotic/muscle relaxant unspecified 17 (2.1)
  Miscellaneousc 17 (2.1)
Barbiturates 26 (3.2)
  Butalbital 14 (1.7)
  Phenobarbital 6 (0.7)
  Miscellaneousd 6 (0.7)
Class total 803 (100)

aIncludes clorazepate, lorazepam, and triazolam

bIncludes cisatracurium and metaxalone

cIncludes acepromazine, aminobutyric acid, etizolam, flumazenil, methaqualone, orphenadrine, propofol, phenibut, ramelteon, and suvorexant

dIncludes butabarbital, pentobarbital, and secobarbital

Anticholinergic/Antihistamine

Table 15 describes the anticholinergic/antihistamine class. Consistent with previous years [1, 2], diphenhydramine (49.8%), followed by hydroxyzine (15.1%), remained the most commonly reported agents in this class.

Table 15.

Anticholinergics and antihistamines

N (%)
Diphenhydramine 303 (49.8)
Hydroxyzine 92 (15.1)
Doxylamine 35 (5.6)
Promethazine 28 (4.6)
Benztropine 26 (4.3)
Anticholinergic unspecified 24 (3.9)
Chlorpheniramine 24 (3.9)
Loratadine 13 (2.1)
Dicyclomine 11 (1.8)
Certirizine 9 (1.5)
Trihexyphenidyl 8 (1.3)
Antihistamine unspecified 7 (1.1)
Meclizine 5 (0.8)
Pyrilamine 5 (0.8)
Miscellaneousa 18 (3.0)
Class total 608 (100)

aIncludes brompheniramine, oxybutynin, scopolamine, atropine, cyproheptadine, dimenhydrinate, fexofenadine, glycopyrrolate, hyoscyamine, mirabegron, and tiotropium

Sympathomimetics

Table 16 presents the sympathomimetic class. Cocaine (35.1%), followed by methamphetamine (31.6%), and amphetamine (11.1%) were the most commonly reported agents in the class again this year.

Table 16.

Sympathomimetic agents

N (%)
Cocaine 203 (35.1)
Methamphetamine 183 (31.6)
Amphetamine 64 (11.1)
Methylphenidate 31 (5.4)
Dextroamphetamine 22 (3.8)
Lisdexamfetamine 17 (2.9)
MDMA (Methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine, Ecstasy) 14 (2.4)
Sympathomimetic unspecified 11 (1.9)
Phentermine 7 (1.2)
Atomoxetine 4 (0.7)
Dexmethylphenidate 4 (0.7)
Pseudoephedrine 4 (0.7)
Clenbuterol 3 (0.5)
Miscellaneousa 12 (2.1)
Class total 579 (100)

aIncludes 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine, 25-NBOMe, α-pyrrolidinohexiophenone.(α-PHP), cathinone, diethylpropion, ephedrine, epinephrine, phenmetrazine, phenylephrine, phenylethylamine, propylhexedrine, and tetrahydrozoline

Toxic Alcohol and Ethanol

Table 17 describes data on ethanol and toxic alcohols. Ethanol was considered its own agent class, consistent with prior years and was the seventh most commonly reported agent class. The most commonly reported nonethanol alcohols and glycols were ethylene glycol and isopropanol, together making up 64.8% of the agent class. There were a number of miscellaneous alcohols and glycols reported which together made up 22.5% of the class.

Table 17.

Ethanol and toxic alcohols

N (%)
Ethanola 568 (100)
Nonethanol alcohols and glycols
  Ethylene glycol 25 (35.2)
  Isopropanol 21 (29.6)
  Methanol 9 (12.7)
  Miscellaneousb 16 (22.5)
Class total 71 (100)

aEthanol is considered a separate agent class

bIncludes butanol, ethylene glycol monohexyl, diethyl ether, diethylene glycol, glycol ethers, and toxic alcohol unspecified

Cardiovascular Agents

Table 18 shows data on the cardiovascular class. For the second consecutive year in the Registry, sympatholytics (26.3%) outnumber beta-blockers (24.3%) as the most common subclass of cardiovascular agents, followed by calcium channel blockers (15.4%) [1]. Clonidine (21.4%) and metoprolol (12.9%) were the most common sympatholytic and beta-blocker agents, respectively, and the two most common agents reported to the overall class. Vasodilators/other antihypertensives, ACEI and ARBs, antidysrhythmics and other cardiovascular agents, and cardiac glycosides each accounted for less than 10% of the class.

Table 18.

Cardiovascular agents by type

N (%)
α2 Agonists 147 (26.3)
  Clonidine 120 (21.4)
  Guanfacine 26 (4.6)
  Xylazine 1 (0.2)
Beta blockers 136 (24.3)
  Metoprolol 72 (12.9)
  Propranolol 32 (5.7)
  Atenolol 15 (2.7)
  Carvedilol 13 (2.3)
  Miscellaneousa 4 (0.7)
Calcium channel blockers 86 (15.4)
  Amlodipine 45 (8.0)
  Diltiazem 20 (3.6)
  Verapamil 15 (2.7)
  Miscellaneousb 6 (1.1)
Other antihypertensives and vasodilators 55 (9.8)
  Prazosin 28 (5.0)
  Antihypertensive unspecified 11 (2.0)
  Isosorbide 6 (1.1)
  Hydralazine 5 (0.9)
  Miscellaneousc 5 (0.9)
ACEI/ARB 51 (9.1)
  Lisinopril 35 (6.2)
  Losartan 10 (1.8)
  Miscellaneousd 6 (1.1)
Antidysrhythmics and other cardiovascular agents 26 (4.6)
  Cardiovascular agent unspecified 11 (2.0)
  Amiodarone 5 (0.9)
  Sotalol 5 (0.9)
  Miscellaneouse 5 (0.9)
Cardiac glycosides 24 (4.3)
  Digoxin 23 (4.1)
  Digitoxin 1 (0.2)
Diuretics 22 (3.9)
  Hydrochlorothiazide 7 (1.2)
  Furosemide 6 (1.1)
  Miscellaneousf 9 (1.6)
Antihyperlipidemic 13 (2.3)
  Atorvastatin 8 (1.4)
  Miscellaneousg 5 (0.9)
Class total 560 (100)

aIncludes bisoprolol, nadolol, and nebivolol

bIncludes lercanidipine and nifedipine

cIncludes nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, pentoxifylline, phentolamine, and tamsulosin

dIncludes enalapril and valsartan

eIncludes dofetilide and flecainide

fIncludes acetazolamide, bumetanide, chlorthalidone, spironolactone, and triamterene

gIncludes lovastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin

Older Adult Cardiovascular Agents

Table 19 describes the cardiovascular agents reported in cases of age > 65. Metoprolol (21.6%) and digoxin (20.3%) were the most commonly reported agents, followed by amlodipine (9.5%).

Table 19.

Most frequent agent exposures in cardiovascular class age > 65

N (%)a
Metoprolol 16 (21.6)
Digoxin 15 (20.3)
Amlodipine 7 (9.5)
Amiodarone 4 (5.4)
Diltiazem 4 (5.4)
Atenolol 3 (4.1)
Lisinopril 3 (4.1)
Verapamil 3 (4.1)
Carvedilol 2 (2.7)
Flecainide 2 (2.7)
Isosorbide 2 (2.7)
Propranolol 2 (2.7)
Sotalol 2 (2.7)
Atorvastatin 1 (1.4)
Clonidine 1 (1.4)
Enalapril 1 (1.4)
Hydralazine 1 (1.4)
Lercanidipine 1 (1.4)
Nadolol 1 (1.4)
Nebivolol 1 (1.4)
Nifedipine 1 (1.4)
Tamsulosin 1 (1.4)
Class total 74 (100)

aPercentages are out of total number of cardiovascular agent exposures reported in adults aged > 65 in 2018 (N = 74)

Antipsychotics

Table 20 details the antipsychotic class. Trends in the antipsychotic class were similar to previous years, with the atypicals, led by quetiapine (46.1%) and olanzapine (15.9%), representing the majority of cases reported [1, 2].

Table 20.

Antipsychotics

N (%)
Quetiapine 203 (46.1)
Olanzapine 70 (15.9)
Risperidone 42 (9.5)
Aripiprazole 41 (9.3)
Haloperidol 24 (5.5)
Antipsychotic unspecified 10 (2.3)
Lurasidone 10 (2.3)
Ziprasidone 8 (1.8)
Clozapine 7 (1.6)
Paliperidone 6 (1.4)
Miscellaneousa 19 (4.3)
Class total 440 (100)

aIncludes chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, prochlorperazine, brexpiprazole, amisulpride, asenapine, cariprazine, loxapine, perphenazine, and thioridazine.

Anticonvulsants, Mood Stabilizers, and Lithium

Table 21 presents data on anticonvulsants, mood stabilizers, and lithium. Consistent with past years, lithium was considered as its own agent class and made up just over 1% of reported agents in the Registry. Among anticonvulsants and mood stabilizers, lamotrigine and valproic acid were the most commonly reported, together making up almost half (47%) of the class. Similar to past years, carbamazepine and topiramate were the next most common, contributing 10.2% and 9.8%, respectively.

Table 21.

Anticonvulsants and mood stabilizers

N (%)
Lithiuma 112 (100)
Lamotrigine 82 (25.2)
Valproic acid 71 (21.8)
Carbamazepine 33 (10.2)
Topiramate 32 (9.8)
Phenytoin 27 (8.3)
Levetiracetam 25 (7.7)
Oxcarbazepine 22 (6.8)
Divalproex 7 (2.2)
Lacosamide 7 (2.2)
Zonisamide 7 (2.2)
Anticonvulsant unspecified 5 (1.5)
Miscellaneousb 2 (0.6)
Class total 325 (100)

aLithium is considered a separate agent class

bIncludes ethosuximide and primidone

Envenomations and Marine Poisonings

Table 22 shows data on envenomations and marine poisonings. Snake envenomations represented by Crotalus (38%), Agkistrodon (17.2%), and snake unspecified (16.4%) composed the top three exposures reported to this class. This trend differs from last year when Agkistrodon species slightly outnumbered Crotalus [1]. Again in 2018, Loxosceles exposures were the 4th most common exposure in this class (8.4%).

Table 22.

Envenomations and marine poisonings

N (%)
Crotalus (Rattlesnake) 104 (38.0)
Agkistrodon (Copperhead, Cottonmouth/Water moccasin) 47 (17.2)
Snake unspecified 45 (16.4)
Loxosceles (Recluse spiders) 23 (8.4)
Trimeresurus albolabris (var Pit viper incl white lipped, green tree) 12 (4.4)
Envenomation unspecified 7 (2.6)
Miscellaneousa 36 (13.1)
Class Total 274 (100)

aIncludes Aspidelaps lubricus (Coral cobra), Bitis gabonica (Gaboon viper), Chilopoda (Centipede unspecified), Ciguetara poisoning, Hydrodynastes gigas (False water cobra), Hymenoptera spp., Latrodectus (Widow spiders), Micrurus (Eastern coral snake), Naja kaouthia (Monocled cobra), palytoxin, Trimeresurus unspecified (Pit viper unspecified), Vipera palaestinae, unspecified animal bite, unspecified insect, unspecified scorpion, and unspecified spider

Psychoactives

Table 23 presents data on the psychoactive class including the amphetamine-like hallucinogen methylenedioxymethamphetamine (Molly). In 2017, an increase in Molly cases was noted (6 to 12 from the previous year) [1] which decreased in 2018, with five cases reported. Similar to last year, marijuana cases (36.5%) again surpassed synthetic cannabinoid cases (12.3%). This trend is a reversal to findings from 2015 to 2016 when synthetic cannabinoid cases were more prevelant [1, 2, 5]. This proportional increase of marijuana cases was even more pronounced this year. Additionally in 2018, non-synthetic cannabinoids (12.7%) became the second most common agent reported for the first time in Registry history, doubling in frequency from the previous year [15]. Reported cases of nicotine and cannabidiol also increased this year. Overall, the number of psychoactive cases reported increased this year compared to 2017 [1].

Table 23.

Psychoactives

N (%)
Molly-amphetamine-like hallucinogena 5 (100)
Marijuana 95 (36.5)
Cannabinoid nonsynthetic 33 (12.7)
Cannabinoid synthetic 32 (12.3)
Gamma hydroxybutyrate 16 (6.2)
Ketamine 14 (5.4)
LSD 13 (5.0)
Phencyclidine 11 (4.2)
Nicotine 8 (3.1)
Cannabidiol 7 (2.7)
Methylenedioxymethamphetamine 5 (1.9)
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol 5 (1.9)
Miscellaneousb 21 (8.1)
Class total 260 (100)

aAmphetamine-like hallucinogens are considered a separate agent class

LSD lysergic acid diethylamide

bIncludes psychoactive unspecified, 1,4-Butanediol, donepezil, 3-methoxyphencyclidine, gamma butyrolactone, tetrahydrocannabinol, 3-Methoxy Eticyclidine (3-MeO PCE), disulfiram, dimethyltryptamine (DMT), Eticyclidine (O-PCE, 2-Oxo-PCE), gutka, hallucinogen unspecified, ibogaine, O-Acetylpsilocin, pharmaceutical tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), piracetam.

Diabetic Agents

Table 24 presents the diabetic medication agent class. Metformin was the most common agent at 32.6% of the agent class. The sulfonylureas glipizide, glimepiride, and glyburide together made up 34% of the class.

Table 24.

Diabetic medications

N (%)
Metformin 46 (32.6)
Insulin 36 (25.5)
Glipizide 27 (19.1)
Glimepiride 15 (10.6)
Glyburide 6 (4.3)
Miscellaneousa 11 (7.8)
Class total 141 (100)

aIncludes diabetic medication unspecified, dulaglutide, empagliflozin, gliclazide, sitagliptin, and sulfonylurea unspecified

Gases, Irritants, Vapors, and Dusts

Table 25 describes the gases, irritants, vapors, and dusts class. Carbon monoxide was again the most common reported agent in this class (65.8%) [15], followed by smoke (6.3%) and chlorine (4.5%) gases.

Table 25.

Gases, irritants, vapors, and dusts

N (%)
Carbon monoxide 73 (65.8)
Smoke 7 (6.3)
Chlorine 5 (4.5)
Gases/vapors/irritants/dusts unspecified 5 (4.5)
Miscellaneousa 21 (18.9)
Class total 111 (100)

aIncludes cyanide, fumes/vapors/gases unspecified, volatile organic compounds (VOC) unspecified, diesel exhaust, dust, nitrogen oxides, chloramine, duster (canned air), exhaust fumes, fiberglass, phosgene, polyurethane vapors.

Metals

Table 26 presents the metal class. Lithium is its own agent class, reported here with the anticonvulsants and mood stabilizers. Trends were similar to previous years with lead (26.7%) and iron (24.8%) representing the majority of reported cases. Notably, there was not an increase in reported cases of lead in 2018 compared to the previous 3 years [1, 2, 5]. Gadolinium (10.9%) cases increased in 2018.

Table 26.

Metals

N (%)
Lead 27 (26.7)
Iron 25 (24.8)
Gadolinium 11 (10.9)
Cadmium 7 (6.9)
Arsenic 5 (5.0)
Cobalt 4 (4.0)
Copper 4 (4.0)
Mercury 4 (4.0)
Metal unspecified 3 (3.0)
Chromium 2 (2.0)
Nickel 2 (2.0)
Miscellaneousa 7 (6.9)
Class total 101 (100)

aIncludes aluminum, antimony, copper sulfate, magnesium, mercuric sulfate, unspecified steel iron, and uranium

Herbal Products and Dietary Supplements

Table 27 details herbal products and dietary supplements. Caffeine was again the most commonly reported agent. Infrequently reported miscellaneous agents made up 33.6% of the agent class.

Table 27.

Herbal products and dietary supplements

N (%)
Caffeine 42 (38.2)
Melatonin 21 (19.1)
Herbals/dietary supplements/vitamins unspecified 10 (9.1)
Miscellaneousa 37 (33.6)
Class total 110 (100)

aIncludes Aleurites moluccanus (candlenut seed), Angelica sinensis (Dong quai, female ginseng), botanical essential oil mixture not otherwise specified, calcium, copaiba (copaifera) extract or oil, dietary supplement unspecified, dinitrophenol, essential oil unspecified, eucalyptus oil, eugenol (clove oil), frankensence (Boswellia) extract or oil, grapefruit extract, herbal (dietary) multibotanical, juniper (Juniperus) extract or oil, methylxanthine, multiple vitamin, peppermint oil, potassium, senna, tea tree oil, tryptophan, vitamin B1 (thiamine), vitamin B3 (niacin), vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin), vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin D, vitamin unspecified, and yohimbine.

Household Agents

Table 28 describes household agents reported to the Registry. Cleaning solutions and disinfectants (29.2%), sodium hypochlorite < 6% (18.5%), and laundry detergent pods (15.4%) were the top three most commonly reported agents in this class. The relative contribution of laundry pod exposures increased in 2018 after a small decrease last year (11.8%) [1].

Table 28.

Household products

N (%)
Cleaning solutions and disinfectants 19 (29.2)
Sodium hypochlorite ≤ 6% 12 (18.5)
Laundry detergent pod 10 (15.4)
Soaps and detergents 9 (13.8)
Miscellaneousa 15 (23.1)
Class total 65 (100)

aIncludes aromatic or essential oils (carrier/solvent base unspecified), dishwasher detergent, enamel/clearcoats, fabric softener, hair product, hand sanitizer unspecified, latex unspecified, paint stripper, perfume, phenylenediamine (hair dye), shaving cream, spray adhesive, windshield washer fluid

Plants and Fungi

Table 29 presents data for plant and fungi exposures for the Registry in 2018. Trends were unchanged from the previous year with mold representing the most common exposure (41.4%), followed by mushroom unknown/unspecified (17.2%) and Mitragyna speciosa (kratom) (12.1%) exposures. Infrequent miscellaneous agents made up 29.3% of the class.

Table 29.

Plants and fungi

N (%)
Mold 24 (41.4)
Mushroom, other/unknown 10 (17.2)
Mitragyna speciosa (kratom) 7 (12.1)
Amanita pantherina 2 (3.4)
Lavender 2 (3.4)
Miscellaneousa 13 (22.4)
Class Total 58 (100)

aIncludes Abrus precatorius (rosary pea), Arnica, betel nut, Cerbera manghas (sea mango), Cerbera odollam (pong-pong seeds), Datura stramonium (jimson weed), Drimia maritima (squill), Mentha pulegium (pennyroyal), Ganoderma mushrooms, psilocybin mushrooms, Ricinus communis (castor beans), strychnine, and Vicia faba (fava bean)

Supplemental Tables

Cough and Cold Preparations

Table S1 details data on cough and cold preparations reported to the Registry. Dextromethorphan was by far the most commonly reported agent, making up 87.1% of the class.

Hydrocarbons

Table S2 presents the hydrocarbon agent class. The largest contributor to the class was unspecified hydrocarbons with 31.5% of the agent class. Methane was the next most commonly reported making up 8.2% of the class.

Caustics

Table S3 presents the caustic agent class. Hydrofluoric acid was the most common agent reported in 2018 making up 14.3% of the class, an increase from the past 2 years [1, 2]. Less frequently reported miscellaneous agents made up nearly half of the agent class (48.6%).

Antimicrobials

Table S4 presents data on antimicrobial agents which is subdivided into antibiotics, antivirals, and other antimicrobial agents. In 2018, dapsone was the most commonly reported agent (12.7%). Antiviral agents made up 15.9% of the class and were predominantly miscellaneous agents (11.1%). The other antimicrobial subsection was made up of multiple miscellaneous agents (15.9%).

Endocrine

Table S5 describes the 25 endocrine agents reported. Levothyroxine represents the majority (56.0%) of the cases reported in this class.

Chemotherapeutic and Immunological Agents

Table S6 describes chemotherapeutic and immunological agents. Hydroxychloroquine (25%), methotrexate (16.7%), and colchicine (16.7%) were the three most commonly reported agents. Relative hydroxychloroquine exposures increased from 2017 [1].

Other Non-pharmaceuticals

Table S7 describes the other non-pharmaceutical class. Methacrylates (20.8%) were the most common agents in this class. Miscellaneous agents made up 50.0% of this class.

Gastrointestinal Agents

Table S8 presents gastrointestinal agents. Omeprazole (27.5%), ondansetron (22.5%), and ranitidine (20.0%) were the most commonly reported agents.

Insecticides, Herbicides, Rodenticides, and Fungicides

Table S9 presents the insecticide, herbicide, rodenticide, and fungicide class. There were 21 insecticides reported. Miscellaneous agents composed 38.1% and pyrethrins composed 28.6% of insecticides. There were 11 rodenticides reported. Brodifacoum composed 45.5% of rodenticides. Herbicides and fungicides were infrequently reported.

Anticoagulants

Table S10 details anticoagulant class exposures. Warfarin was the most commonly reported agent (61.3%).

Other Pharmaceuticals

Table S11 presents the other pharmaceutical products agent class. The majority of the class (70.8%) was made up of infrequently reported miscellaneous agents. Unspecified pharmaceutical products were the most commonly reported agent (16.7%).

Anesthetics

Table S12 describes anesthetic class exposures. There were 23 entries in this class. Benzonatate was the most commonly reported agent.

Weapons of Mass Destruction

Table S13 describes the weapons of mass destruction class. This year botulinum toxin was the only agent in the weapons of mass destruction class reported.

Anti-Parkinsonism Agents

Table S14 presents the anti-parkinsonism agent class, containing nine entries. Levodopa/carbidopa was reported with the most frequency (77.8%). Pramipexole and ropinirole each had one entry.

Foreign Bodies

Table S15 details the six foreign body ingestions reported to the registry in 2018. Batteries represented 50% of foreign body ingestions.

Pulmonary Agents

Table S16 describes reported pulmonary agents. Montelukast was the most common agent reported (50%).

Clinical Signs and Symptoms

The clinical signs and symptoms categories report information on a diverse range of abnormal clinical findings. In order to be reported as being present, predefined criteria must be met for each category. For example, tachycardia is defined as a heart rate greater than 140 beats per minute. Additionally, each case may report more than one abnormality within a group or across groups. For example, a single case entry may have multiple vital sign abnormalities, or may have both a vital sign abnormality and a neurologic abnormality. The percentages for these categories are calculated relative to the total number of Registry cases. It is therefore possible for the total to be more than 100%.

Toxidromes

Table 30 reports the 2156 toxidromes reported to the Registry in 2018. Consistent with previous years, the sedative-hypnotic toxidrome was the most common (10.8%). The next top four toxidromes were also unchanged from 2017: anticholinergic (6.6%), sympathomimetic (4.7%), opioid (3.2%), and serotonin syndrome (2.7%) [1].

Table 30.

Toxidromes

N (%)a
Sedative-hypnotic 761 (10.8)
Anticholinergic 464 (6.6)
Sympathomimetic 330 (4.7)
Opioid 268 (3.8)
Serotonin syndrome 192 (2.7)
Sympatholytic 48 (0.7)
Alcoholic ketoacidosis 46 (0.7)
NMSb 12 (0.2)
Cholinergic 11 (0.2)
Overlap syndromes (MCS, chronic fatigue, etc.) 11 (0.2)
Washout syndrome 8 (0.1)
Miscellaneousc 5 (0.1)
Total 2156 (30.8)

aPercentage equals number cases reporting specific toxidrome relative to total number of Registry cases in 2018 (N = 7043)

bNMS: neuroleptic malignant syndrome

cIncludes anticonvulsant hypersensitivity, fume fever

Major Vital Sign Abnormalities

Table 31 presents the 1974 vital sign abnormalities reported to the Registry in 2018. Trends were similar to the previous year [1]. Tachycardia (11.9%), hypotension (6.9%), and bradycardia (4.2%) were the most common vital sign abnormalities reported.

Table 31.

Major vital sign abnormalities

N (%)a
Tachycardia (HR > 140) 835 (11.9)
Hypotension (systolic BP < 80 mmHg) 483 (6.9)
Bradycardia (HR < 50) 298 (4.2)
Hypertension (systolic BP > 200 mmHg and/or diastolic BP > 120 mmHg) 172 (2.4)
Bradypnea (RR < 10) 152 (2.2)
Hyperthermia (temp > 105 °F) 34 (0.5)
Total 1974 (28.1)b

HR heart rate, BP blood pressure, RR respiratory rate

aPercentage equals the number of cases relative to the total number of Registry cases in 2018 (N = 7043).

bTotal reflects cases reporting at least one major vital sign abnormality. Cases may be associated with more than one major vital sign abnormality.

Clinical Signs and Symptoms—Neurologic

Table 32 describes the 3783 neurologic clinical signs and symptoms. Coma/CNS depression (29.6%), agitation (14.7%), and delirium/toxic psychosis (10.5%) remained the most commonly reported signs.

Table 32.

Clinical signs and symptoms-neurological

N (%)a
Coma/CNS depression 2087 (29.6)
Agitation 1036 (14.7)
Delirium/toxic psychosis 738 (10.5)
Hyperflexia/myoclonus/clonus/tremor 426 (6.0)
Seizures 420 (6.0)
Hallucinations 244 (3.5)
Weakness/paralysis 79 (1.1)
EPS/dystonia/rigidity 76 (1.1)
Numbness/paresthesia 56 (0.8)
Peripheral neuropathy (objective) 20 (0.3)
Total 3783(53.7)b

aPercentage based on the total number of Registry cases in 2018 (N = 7043)

bTotal reflects cases reporting at least one neurologic symptom (N = 3783). Cases may have reported multiple neurological clinical effects

Clinical Signs and Symptoms—Cardiovascular and Pulmonary

Table 33 presents the 642 cardiovascular and 849 pulmonary clinical signs reported to the Registry in 2018. QTc (5.1%) and respiratory depression (8.8%) remained the most common signs in their respective categories this year.

Table 33.

Clinical signs–cardiovascular and pulmonary

N (%)a
Cardiovascular
  Prolonged QTc (≥ 500  ms) 358 (5.1)
  Prolonged QRS (≥ 120  ms) 108 (1.5)
  Myocardial injury or infarction 97 (1.4)
  Ventricular dysrhythmia 54 (0.8)
  AV Block (> 1st degree) 25 (0.4)
  Total 642 (9.1)b
Pulmonary
  Respiratory depression 681 (8.8)
  Aspiration pneumonitis 103 (1.5)
  Acute lung injury/ARDSc 73 (1.0)
  Asthma/reactive airway disease 55 (0.8)
  Total 849 (12.1)b

aPercentage equals number cases reporting signs of symptoms relative to total number of Registry cases in 2018 (N = 7043)

bTotal reflects cases reporting at least one cardiovascular or pulmonary symptom. Cases may be associated with more than one symptom

cARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome

Clinical Signs—Other Organ Systems

Table 34 presents the other organ system clinical signs which include metabolic, renal and musculoskeletal, hematological, gastrointestinal and hepatic, and dermatological. Metabolic abnormalities were again the most frequently reported, and among these an elevated anion gap and metabolic acidosis were the most common. Renal and musculoskeletal abnormalities were the next most commonly reported, with acute kidney injury (4.0%) and rhabdomyolysis (3.7%) reported with similar frequencies. Coagulopathy was the most commonly reported hematological abnormality (2.0%). Hepatotoxicity was the most common gastrointestinal and hepatic abnormality (3.1%). Other gastrointestinal and hepatic abnormalities were less common, each reported in less than 1% of total Registry cases. Among cases reporting any clinical sign, dermatological abnormalities were less frequently reported (2.7%), with rash being the most commonly reported among these.

Table 34.

Clinical signs–other organ systems

N (%)a
Metabolic
  Elevated anion gap (> 20) 286 (4.1)
  Metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.2) 276 (3.9)
  Hypoglycemia (glucose < 50  mg/dL) 122 (1.7)
  Elevated osmole gap (> 20) 28 (0.4)
  Total 535 (7.6)b
Renal/musculoskeletal
  Acute kidney injury (creatinine > 2.0  mg/dL) 285 (4.0)
  Rhabdomyolysis (CPK > 1000  IU/L) 263 (3.7)
  Total 478 (6.8)b
Hematological
  Coagulopathy (PT > 15  s) 139 (2.0)
  Leukocytosis (WBC > 20  K/μL) 82 (1.2)
  Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 100  K/μL) 80 (1.1)
  Hemolysis (Hgb < 10  g/dL) 47 (0.7)
  Methemoglobinemia (MetHgb ≥ 2%) 23 (0.3)
  Pancytopenia 7 (0.1)
  Total 310 (4.4)b
Gastrointestinal/hepatic
  Hepatotoxicity (AST ≥ 1000  IU/L) 220 (3.1)
  Gastrointestinal bleeding 40 (0.6)
  Pancreatitis 29 (0.4)
  Corrosive injury 24 (0.3)
  Intestinal ischemia 4 (0.1)
  Total 294 (4.2)b
Dermatological
  Rash 100 (1.4)
  Blister/Bullae 75 (1.1)
  Angioedema 31 (0.4)
  Necrosis 20 (0.3)
  Total 193 (2.7)b

AST aspartate aminotransferase, PT prothrombin time, WBC white blood cells, Hgb hemoglobin, CPK creatine phosphokinase

aPercentage equals the number of cases reporting specific clinical signs compared to the total number of Registry cases in 2018 (N = 7043)

bTotal reflects cases reporting at least one sign in the category. Cases may be associated with more than one symptom

Fatalities

Tables 35 and 36 present cases in which fatalities were reported in 2018. Table 35 includes cases in which a single agent was reported; Table 36 includes cases involving multiple agents. Table S17 in the Supplementary materials presents those fatalities in which it is unknown whether there was a related toxicologic exposure.

Table 35.

2018 Fatalities reported in ToxIC Registry with known toxicological exposurea: Single Agent

Age/genderb Agents involved Clinical findingsc Life support withdrawn Brain death confirmed Treatmentd
20M Abrus precatorious TC, CNS, SZ, GIB, WBC, RFX, OTH1 Yes No None listed
41F Acetaminophen CNS, MA, HPT Yes Unknown NAC, IV fluids
5mF Acetaminophen None listed No No None listed
21F Acetaminophen CNS, HGY, MA, AG, HPT, GIB, AKI Yes No Folate, NAC, thiamine, vitamin K, benzodiazepines, IV fluids
59M Acetaminophen HT, TC, ALI, CNS, HGY, MA, HPT, CPT, AKI, RBM No No NAC, vasopressors, hemodialysis, continuous renal replacement, intubation, IV fluids
57F Acetaminophen CNS, DLM, HGY, MA, AG, HPT, WBC Yes Unknown NAC, glucose > 5%, intubation
37M Acetaminophen HT, CNS, HGY, MA, AG, HPT, PNC, CPT, PLT, AKI Yes No Fomepizole, NAC, vasopressors, glucose > 5%, opioids, intubation IV fluids
54F Acetaminophen HT, QTC, RD, CNS, MA, AG, HPT, AKI Yes No NAC, physostigmine, vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids
42F Acetaminophen HT, CNS, HGY, MA, AG, HPT, AKI, OTH2 Yes No Factor replacement, NAC, vitamin K, vasopressors, glucose > 5%, activated charcoal
32F Acetaminophen HT, HTN, BP, VD, AGT, CNS, MA, AG, HPT, CPT No No NAC, vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, steroids, activated charcoal, hemodialysis, intubation, IV fluids, transfusion
61M Alprazolam HT, TC, QTC, MI, RD, CNS, MA, AKI Unknown Unknown None listed
50M Aspirin ALI, AG Yes Unknown NaHCO3, urinary alkalinization, IV fluids
16M Canabinoid nonsynthetic HT, BC, BP, RAD, CNS, MA, WBC Yes Yes Naloxone/nalmefene, albuterol, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockers, steroids, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
44M Carbamazepine CNS Yes Yes None listed
35F Carbon monoxide None listed No No None listed
23M Carbon monoxide CNS No No HBO
23F Carbon monoxide HT, TC, ALI, CNS, MA, AG Yes Yes Hydroxocobalamin, NaHCO3, thiosulfate, vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, neuromuscular blockers, steroids
9M Carbon monoxide HT, ALI, RD, CNS, MA, AG, No No Hydroxocobalamin, thiosulfate, vasopressors, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
66F Carbon monoxide HT, BC, ALI, RD, CNS, No No None listed
10M Carbon monoxide HT, RD, CNS, AG Yes Yes Intubation, IV fluids
56F Clonidine BC, CNS Yes Yes Vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids
46M Cocaine SZ, VD Yes Yes None listed
18 mM Dextroamphetamine TC, AGT No No Benzodiazepines, IV fluids
48F Diltiazem HT, BC, ALI, MA, AG No No Calcium, HIE, NaHCO3, vasopressors, benzodiazepines, glucose > 5%, neuromuscular blockers, activated charcoal, continuous renal replacement therapy, ECMO, intubation, IV fluids
31M Diltiazem HT, BC, AVB, ALI, AP, HPT, CPT, BL Yes Unknown Calcium, HIE, vasopressors, CPR, ECMO, intubation, IV fluids
13F Diphenhydramine HT, TC, QRS, RD, CNS, SZ Yes Yes NaHCO3, vasopressors, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockers, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
59F Ethanol HT, CNS, MA, AG, GIB, CPT, PLT, WBC No Unknown Fomepizole, octreotide, NaHCO3, thiamine, vitamin K, vasopressors, CPR, intubation, IV fluids, transfusion
29F Ethylene glycol AG, AKI Yes No Fomepizole, hemodialysis
34F Fentanyl HT, RD, CNS, AKI Yes Yes Naloxone, vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids
35M Fentanyl HT, BC, BP, VD, MI, RD, CNS, SZ, MA, AG, HYS Yes Yes NAC, naloxone, NaHCO3, vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockade, opioids, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
77F Flecainide HT, BC, VD, QRS, QTC, AVB, MI, ALI, AP, CNS, MA, HPT, AKI Yes No HIE, NaHCO3, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, CPR, intubation
38M Heroin CNS No No Naloxone
26F Heroin HT, QTC, RD, CNS Yes Yes Naloxone, CPR, intbuation
45F Insulin TC, QTC, RD, CNS Yes Unknown Naloxone, glucose > 5%, intubation, IV fluids
38F Lidocaine HT, BC, AGT No No HIE, vasopressors, CPR, IV fluids
57M Metaxalone HT, QTC, RD, CNS, MA No No Vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation
48M Methadone CNS Yes Yes Naloxone, vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids
48F Methadone HT, CNS Yes Yes Vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, intubation, IV fluids
86 M Methotrexate HYT, GIB, HYS, CPT, PLT, PCT Yes No None listed
29F Oxycodone HT, ALI, CNS, MA, AKI, RBM No No Naloxone, vasopressors, intubation
43M Phentolamine HT, TC, CNS, AKI Yes No Vasopressors, intubation,
19F Propranolol HTN, TC, BC, VD, AVB, ALI, RD, CNS, SZ, MA No No Calcium, glucagon, HIE, NaHCO3, vasopressors, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, glucose > 5%, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
45M Quinine VD, CNS, AKI, RBM Yes Yes Naloxone, intubation
19M Sodium hypochlorite <6% HT, CRV No No None listed
10M Unknown agent HT, RD, CNS Unknown Unknown Naloxone prevention kit, vasopressors, CPR, intubation
87F Verapamil HT, BC, QTC, AVB, ALI, AKI Yes Unknown HIE, vasopressors, glucose > 5%, IV fluids
40M Water RD, CNS, SZ Yes Yes Folate, thiamine, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, intubation, mannitol
62M None listed AG, HPT, PNC No No NAC, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids
70M None listed None listed Unknown Unknown None listed

aBased on response from Medical Toxicologist “Did the patient have a toxicological exposure?” equals Yes with known agent(s)

bAge in years unless otherwise stated. wk: weeks, m: months

cAG: anion gap, AGT: agitation, AKI: Acute kidney injury, ALI: acute lung injury/ARDS, AP: aspiration pneumonia, AVB: AV block, BC: bradycardia, BL: blisters/bullae, BP: bradypnea, CNS: coma/CNS depression, CPT: coagulopathy, CRV: corrosive injury, DLM: delirium, GIB: GI bleeding, HGY: hypoglycemia, HPT: hepatoxicity, HT: hypotension, HTN: hypertension, HYS: hemolysis, HYT: hyperthermia, MA: metabolic acidosis, MI: myocardial injury/ischemia, OTH1: choreoathetoid movement, OTH2: hypothermia, PCT: pancytopenia, PLT: thrombocytopenia, PNC: pancreatitis, QTC: QTc prolongation, RAD: asthma/reactive airway disease, RBM: rhabdomyolysis, RD: respiratory depression, RFX: hyperreflexia/tremor, SZ: seizures, TC: tachycardia, VD: ventricular dysrhythmia, WBC: leukocytosis

dPharmcological and non-pharmacological support as reported by Medical Toxicologist; BAL: Dimercaprol, CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECMO: Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, HBO: hyperbaric oxygenation, HIE: high dose insulin euglycemic therapy, NAC: n-Acetyl cysteine, NaHCO3: Sodium bicarbonate

Table 36.

2018 Fatalities reported in ToxIC Registry with known toxicological exposurea: Multiple Agents

Age/genderb Agents involved Clinical findingsc Life support withdrawn Brain death confirmed Treatmentd
36F Acetaminophen, pregabalin HT, VD, QRS, RD, CNS, MA, AG Yes Yes NAC, vasopressors, glucose > 5%, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
43M Acetaminophen, diphenhydramine, ranitidine, citalopram HT, MI, ALI, AP, CNS, HGY, MA, HPT, CPT, PLT, AKI Yes Yes Folate, NAC, octreotide, bicarbonate, thiamine, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids, phenobarbital
52M Acetaminophen, codeine HT, AP, CNS, HGY, MA, HPT, AKI Unknown Unknown Calcium, fomepizole, NAC, NaHCO3, vasopressors
53F Acetaminophen, metformin HT, RD, CNS, MA, HPT, CPT, PLT No No NAC, vitamin K, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, CPR, intubation, IV fluids
57F Acetaminophen, hydrocodone, diazepam HT, ALI, RD, CNS, HGY, MA, HPT, INT, CPT, AKI, RBM, BL Yes No NAC, vasopressors, glucose 5%, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids
63F Acetaminophen, ibuprofen ALI, RD, CNS, MA, AG, HPT, HYS, CPT, AKI Yes Yes NAC, vitamin K, vasopressors, glucose > 5%, continuous renal replacement therapy, urinary alkalinization, intubation, IV fluids, transfusion
74F Acetaminophen, metformin HT, QTC, DLM, MA, AG, OG, HPT Unknown Unknown NAC, vasopressors, hemodialysis, intubation
62F Amitriptyline, caustic unspecified TC, VD, QRS, QTC, ALI, AP, CNS, SZ, MA, AG No No NaHCO3, vasopressors, hemodialysis
55F Amlodipine, atenolol HT, CNS, MA No No Calcium, glucagon, HIE, methylene blue NaHCO3, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids
32M Anticonvulsant unspecified, olanzapine, lamotrigine, bupropion None listed No No None listed
12F CO, smoke, cyanide HT, TC, ALI, CNS, MA, AG, CPT, WBC, AKI No No Hydroxocobalamin, NaHCO3, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids
79F Carvedilol, amiodarone, ibuprofen, apixaban HT, BC, VD, MI, RD, CNS, GIB, CPT, AKI No No Factor replacement, glucagon, HIE, vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids, transfusion
71F Cefepime, metronidazole CNS No No None listed
50M Cocaine, fentanyl, cannabinoid non-synthetic HT, QTC, MI, ALI, RD, CNS, MA, AG, AKI, RBM Yes Yes None listed
63M Cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, fentanyl, acetyl fentanyl HT, TC, VD, MI, ALI, CNS, MA, AG, OG, HPT, AKI, RBM Unknown Unknown Fomepizole, vasopressors, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids
14M Dextromethorphan, oxycodone HT, BC, QRS, QTC, RD, CNS, MA Yes Yes NAC, naloxone, vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids
61F Diltiazem, fluoxetine HTN, HT, TC, BC, CNS, SZ, MA No No Atropine, calcium, HIE, methylene blue, NaHCO3, vasopressors, opioids, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation
27M Doxylamine, loperamide HT, TC, BC, VD, QRS, QTC, AVB, RD Yes Unknown NaHCO3, vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, CPR, ECMO, intubation, IV fluids, transvenous pacer, hypertonic saline
34F Ethanol, acetaminophen CNS, HGY, MA, HPT, HYS, CPT Yes Unknown Fomepizole NAC, NaHCO3, thiamine, vasopressors, opioids, intubation, IV fluids, transfusion
68F Ethylene glycol, unknown agent HT, AP, RD, CNS, MA, AG, AKI Yes No Fomepizole, pyridoxine, vasopressors, steroids, continuous renal replacement therapy, ECMO, intubation
29F Fentanyl, marijuana QTC, MI, ALI, CNS, SZ, MA, AG Yes Yes Fomepizole, vasopressors, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockers, steroids, CPR, intubation, IV fluids, therapeutic hypothermia
51F Fentanyl, acetaminophen, valproic acid HT, BP, RD, CNS, HPT Yes Unknown Carnitine, NAC, naloxone, intubation
57M Fentanyl, benzodiazepine unspecified HT, BC, QTC, MI, RD, CNS, MA Yes Yes Naloxone, NaHCO3, vasopressors, CPR, intubation, IV fluids, therapeutic hypothermia, MgSO4
25M Heroin, fentanyl, gabapentin HT, VD, CNS Yes Yes Naloxone prevention kit, benzodiazepines, opioids, intubation, IV fluids
32M Heroin, diphenhydramine BP, MI, MI, ALI, RD, CNS Yes Yes Naloxone, vasopressors, intubation, IV fluids
16F Iron, ibuprofen, apixaban HT, ALI, CNS, MA, AG, HPT, CPT, PLT, WBC Yes Yes Vitamin K, deferoxamine, vasopressors, benzodiazepines, continuous renal replacement therapy, intubation, IV fluids, transfusion
18M Loperamide, fentanyl, dextromethorphan, propylhexedrine HT, TC, AP, RD, CNS, RFX, MA, AG, AKI Unknown Unknown Naloxone, vasopressors, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockers, intubation, IV fluids
78M Lorazepam, gabapentin None listed Unknown Unknown None listed
68M Metformin, glyburide RD, CNS, MA, HPT, PCT Yes Yes Vitamin K, vasopressors, hemodialysis, intubation, IV fluids
81F Metoprolol, diltiazem HTN No No Glucagon, vasopressors
52M Morphine, oxycodone, lorazepam Ischemic CVA Unknown Unknown None listed
58M Morphine, oxycodone HT, BC, VD, QRS, QTC, RD, CNS, RFX, CPT, AKI Yes Unknown Calcium, NaHCO3, vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockers, intubation, IV fluids, therapeutic hypothermia
40F Oxycodone, alprazolam, promethazine HT, TC, MI, ALI, CNS, DLM, SZ, MA, AG, HPT, GIB, INT, PLT, AKI, RBM Unknown Unknown NAC, vasopressors, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, neuromuscular blockers, hemodialysis, CPR, intubation, IV fluids, therapeutic hypothermia, transfusion
43F Venlafaxine, amlodipine, risperidone HT, BC, CNS, AKI No No Atropine, calcium, HIE, methylene blue, vasopressors, neuromuscular blockers, activated charcoal, intubation, IV fluids

aBased on response from Medical Toxicologist “Did the patient have a toxicological exposure?” equals Yes with known agent(s)

bAge in years unless otherwise stated. wk: weeks, m: months

cAG: anion gap, AGT: agitation, AKI: Acute kidney injury, ALI: acute lung injury/ARDS, AP: aspiration pneumonia, AVB: AV block, BC: bradycardia, BL: blisters/bullae, BP: bradypnea, CNS: coma/CNS depression, CPT: coagulopathy, CRV: corrosive injury, DLM: delirium, EPS: dystonia, GIB: GI bleeding, HCN: hallucinations, HGY: hypoglycemia, HPT: hepatoxicity, HT: hypotension, HTN: hypertension, HYS: hemolysis, HYT: hyperthermia, INT: intestinal ischemia, MA: metabolic acidosis, MET: methemoglobinemia, NP: neuropathy, OG: osmole gap, OTH1: Rash, OTH2: Skin blisters, necrosis, PCT: pancytopenia, PLT: thrombocytopenia, PNC: pancreatitis, PST: paresthesia, QRS: QRS prolongation, QTc: QTc prolongation, RAD: asthma/reactive airway disease, RBM: rhabdomyolysis, RD: respiratory depression, RFX: hyperreflexia/tremor, SZ: seizures, TC: tachycardia, VD: ventricular dysrhythmia, WBC: leukocytosis, WKN: weakness/paralysis

dPharmcological and Non-pharmacological support as reported by Medical Toxicologist; BAL: Dimercaprol, CPR: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECMO: Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, NAC: n-Acetyl cysteine, NaHCO3: Sodium bicarbonate

There were 106 fatalities in 2018, comprising 1.5% of Registry cases. The percentage of reported fatalities in 2018 ties 2016 for the most reported fatalities in Registry history [15]. 49 cases involved single agent exposures, 34 involved multiple agents, and in 23 cases it was unknown if there was a toxicologic exposure.

There were 36 cases involving opioids, 10 involving fentanyl and 7 as single opioid agents.

Acetaminophen was the most common agent involved in both single and multiple agent fatalities; there were 18 fatalities involving acetaminophen, 9 as a single agent. There were 7 cases of carbon monoxide fatalities, an increase from previous years [1, 2, 4, 5].

In 2018, there were 11 pediatric (age 0–18 years) deaths due to a known toxicologic exposure (13.3%). The age range was 5 months to 18 years. Seven were single agent exposures and 4 involved multiple agents. Two polysubstance cases involved opioids in teenagers; there were no single agent opioid pediatric deaths. There were three deaths due to carbon monoxide exposure, and one death due to acute liver failure in a 5-month-old after an acetaminophen exposure. There was a report of a death secondary to non-synthetic cannabinoid exposure in a 16-year-old who developed hypotension, bradycardia, bradypnea, asthma/ARDS symptoms, and CNS depression as well as metabolic acidosis and leukocytosis. He was treated with naloxone, albuterol, steroids, benzodiazepines, and neuromuscular blockers.

There were 62 fatality cases in which life support was withdrawn, representing 0.9% of Registry cases and nearly doubling from 2017 [1]. It was unknown whether life support was withdrawn in an additional 11 cases. Brain death was declared in 32 cases; brain death confirmation status was unknown in an additional 14 cases.

Adverse Drug Reactions

Table 37 presents the common drugs associated with adverse drug reactions reported to the Registry in 2018. Lithium was again the most common drug reported (5.5%), similar to previous years [15]. Digoxin (4.8%) and valproic acid (4.8%) were the second most common agents. Bupropion was no longer amongst the most common agents this year, and tramadol emerged as one of the top 10 agents (3.6%).

Table 37.

Most common drugs associated with ADRs

N (%)a
Lithium 9 (5.5)
Digoxin 8 (4.8)
Valproic acid 8 (4.8)
Dapsone 7 (4.2)
Haloperidol 7 (4.2)
Sertraline 7 (4.2)
Insulin 6 (3.6)
Metformin 6 (3.6)
Tramadol 6 (3.6)

aPercentage based on the total number of Registry cases reporting an ADR in 2018 (N = 165) ADR adverse drug reaction

Treatment

Antidotal Therapy Administered

Table 38 describes the 2331 antidotes reported to the Registry in 2018. Similar to previous years [1], N-acetylcysteine (40.0%), followed by naloxone/nalmefene (18.9%), and sodium bicarbonate (11.1%) were the most commonly reported antidotes.

Table 38.

Antidotal therapy

N (%)a
N-acetylcysteine 768 (32.9)
Naloxone/nalmefene 441 (18.9)
Sodium bicarbonate 259 (11.1)
Thiamine 157 (6.7)
Folate 95 (4.1)
Physostigmine 84 (3.6)
Fomepizole 79 (3.4)
Glucagon 66 (2.8)
Calcium 50 (2.1)
Atropine 42 (1.8)
Octreotide 40 (1.7)
Insulin-euglycemic therapy 34 (1.5)
Vitamin K 34 (1.5)
Carnitine 33 (1.4)
Flumazenil 33 (1.4)
Methylene blue 28 (1.2)
Cyproheptadine 27 (1.2)
Pyridoxine 15 (0.6)
Fab for digoxin 10 (0.4)
Hydroxocobalamin 8 (0.3)
2-PAM 6 (0.3)
Botulinum antitoxin 4 (0.2)
Dantrolene 4 (0.2)
Ethanol 4 (0.2)
Bromocriptine 3 (0.1)
Thiosulfate 3 (0.1)
Anticoagulation reversal 1 (<0.1)
Silimarin 1 (<0.1)
Total 2331 (100)

aPercentages are out of the total number of antidotes administered (2331); 1920 (27.3%) cases received at least one antidote. Cases may have involved the use of multiple antidotes.

Antivenom Therapy Administered

Table 39 presents data on antivenom therapies reported to the Registry. Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) made up the majority (94.2%) of antivenom therapy administered. Other snake antivenoms and scorpion antivenom were also reported to the Registry in 2018.

Table 39.

Antivenom therapy

N (%)a
Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) 162 (94.2)
Other snake antivenom 7 (4.1)
Scorpion antivenom 3 (1.7)
Total 172 (100)

aPercentages are out of the total number of antivenom treatments administered (N = 172).

Pharmaceutical Supportive Care

Table 40 describes the 2062 pharmaceutical supportive care treatments reported in 2018. Benzodiazepines were again the most commonly reported agents (52.9%) [1] followed by vasopressors (11.0%) and opioids (10.9%). Year 2018 is the first year since 2014 that opioids fell below the second most commonly reported pharmaceutical supportive care treatment [15].

Table 40.

Supportive care-pharmacologic

N (%)a
Benzodiazepines 1446 (52.9)
Vasopressors 302 (11.0)
Opioids 298 (10.9)
Antipsychotics 184 (6.7)
Anticonvulsants 114 (4.2)
Glucose > 5% 102 (3.7)
Neuromuscular blockers 99 (3.6)
Antihypertensives 58 (2.1)
Steroids 47 (1.7)
Albuterol and other bronchodilators 38 (1.4)
Antiarrhythmics 22 (0.8)
Beta-blockers 22 (0.8)
Vasodilators 2 (0.1)
Total 2734 (100)

aPercentage based on the total number of interventions (3574). A total of 2062 registry cases (29.3%) received at least one pharmacologic intervention. Cases may have involved the use of multiple interventions

Non-pharmaceutical Supportive Care

Table 41 presents non-pharmaceutical supportive care treatments reported to the Registry in 2018. The top two agents, IV fluid resuscitation (70.2%) and intubation/ventilatory management (25.5%), remain unchanged from last year and represent the large majority of agents in this category [1].

Table 41.

Supportive care–nonpharmacological

N (%)a
IV fluid resuscitation 2249 (70.2)
Intubation/ventilatory management 815 (25.5)
CPR 49 (1.5)
Transfusion 30 (0.9)
Hyperbaric oxygen 14 (0.4)
Cardioversion 12 (0.4)
ECMO 10 (0.3)
Pacemaker 9 (0.3)
Therapeutic hypothermia 9 (0.3)
Organ transplantation 3 (0.1)
Aortic balloon pump 1 (0.03)
Cardiopulmonary bypass 1 (0.03)
Total 3202 (100)

aPercentages are out of the total number of treatments administered (3202); 2526 registry cases (35.9%) received at least one form of nonpharmacological treatment. Cases may have involved the use of multiple forms of treatment

CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Chelation Therapy Administered

Table 42 presents data on chelation therapy administered. There were 19 cases involving chelation reported in 2018, with 6 cases involving more than 1 chelator. One case reported three different chelators. DMSA was the most commonly reported (38.5%), followed by EDTA (26.9%).

Table 42.

Chelation therapy

N (%)a
DMSA 10 (38.5)
EDTA 7 (26.9)
Deferoxamine 6 (23.1)
Dimercaprol 3 (11.5)
Total 26 (100)

aPercentages are out of the total number of chelation treatments administered (26); 19 registry cases (0.2%) received at least one form of chelation treatment

DMSA dimercaptosuccinic acid, EDTA ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid

Decontamination Interventions Administered

Table 43 describes the 212 decontamination interventions administered. Activated charcoal again represented the significant majority (78.8%) in this class [1].

Table 43.

Supportive care-decontamination

N (%)a
Activated charcoal 167 (78.8)
Whole bowel irrigation 30 (14.2)
Irrigation 12 (5.7)
Gastric lavage 3 (1.4)
Total 212 (100)

aPercentage based on the total number of interventions (212); 208 registry cases (3.0%) received at least one decontamination intervention. Cases may have involved the use of multiple interventions

Enhanced Elimination Interventions Administered

Table 44 presents the enhanced elimination interventions reported. This year, hemodialysis for toxin removal (24.7%) and for other causes (24.7%), followed by continuous renal replacement therapy (24.2%) topped the reported interventions in this class.

Table 44.

Enhanced elimination

N (%)a
Urinary alkalinization 64 (26.4)
Hemodialysis (toxin removal) 60 (24.8)
Continuous renal replacement therapy 60 (24.8)
Hemodialysis (other indication) 45 (18.6)
Multiple-dose activation charcoal 11 (4.5)
Exchange Transfusion 2 (0.8)
Total 219 (100)

aPercentages are out of the total number of treatments administered (219); 191 registry cases (2.7%) received at least one form of enhanced elimination

Discussion

This report describes the 9th year of data collected for the Toxicology Investigators’ Consortium Registry. The small reduction in reported cases this year represents a consistent trend over time. This issue is multifactorial, but a primary reason is persistent efforts for quality control in the Registry; poorly performing sites are frequently reviewed and removed.

Although the Registry is not strictly population based but it represents a wide geographic distribution of cases evaluated in person by medical toxicologists. These data can be used in conjunction with data from other registries including the National Poison Data System to provide a more detailed picture of poisoning trends, novel exposures, and their public health implications.

Trends in novel exposures were not described in this report but are being collected and analyzed to be reported separately.

Overall, this annual report finds trends in agent classes, agents, demographics, types of encounters, clinical signs and symptoms, and treatments to be largely unchanged from previous years. Notable findings or trends in the Registry are discussed below.

Although the overall reported opioid exposures reported to the Registry has leveled off compared to last year, the relative impact of individual agents appears to be evolving, consistent with national trends [9]. Relative heroin and fentanyl exposures increased in the Registry in 2018, whereas there was a relative reduction in oxycodone and tramadol cases reported.

Additionally, in 2018, there was an increase in psychoactive substances reported; notably, this increase was reflective of an increase in non-synthetic cannabinoids including marijuana. This national trend is consistent with trends in the pediatric population which have shown an increase in marijuana exposures, particularly after legalization [10, 11].

Older Adults

Older adults represented 4.7% of registry cases. Interestingly, the top agent class reported for older adults was the cardiovascular class, which differs from the overall registry as well as from data on self-harm cases in this age category [12]. Additionally, the relative impact of cardiovascular agents increased with age, with 22.9% of agents reported in adults > 85 years of age belonging to the cardiovascular class. A possible explanation for this divergence is the nature of cases reported to the Registry. Registry cases require bedside medical toxicology evaluation, and thus may skew towards sicker cases when compared to more population-based registries such as Poison Center data. Cardiovascular agents have significant potential to cause morbidity and mortality, particularly in the extremes of age, perhaps resulting in the increased numbers seen in older adults in the Registry. Other publications have found similar trends [1, 13]. In the pediatric analysis of the 2017 Registry annual report, cardiovascular drugs were also found to be the most common agent reported in children aged 5 or younger [1].

When intent of older adult exposures was analyzed, differing trends from the larger Registry were found. Consistent with the larger Registry, intentional pharmaceutical exposures were the most common reason for encounter. Among these, self-harm was the most frequent intent (41.9%). The second most frequent detailed reason was therapeutic use (34.9%), which differed from the larger Registry where only 7.9% of cases resulted from therapeutic use. The low therapeutic index and potential for drug interactions among cardiovascular drugs may have contributed to the high number of cases in this age group. Indeed, within intentional pharmaceutical exposures in older adults, a large number (21.4%) of cardiovascular agent exposures were the result of therapeutic use.

Seizures and Bupropion

Given bupropion is a commonly used antidepressant with abuse potential and is associated with seizures, registry data was evaluated to determine the seizure rate in this study population. Table 45 reports that in 2018, there was a total of 420 exposures that were complicated by seizure activity, with 79 (19%) of these being secondary to bupropion ingestions. Looking at bupropion ingestions specifically, there were 245 total reported cases. Seizure activity was reported in 79 (32%) of these cases. The amount of bupropion ingested was not reported in all cases, making a dose-response relationship unavailable. Additionally, these ingestions were not all single agent bupropion overdoses; therefore, other drugs may be responsible for the reported seizures.

Table 45.

Seizures after bupropion ingestion

N (%)
All Exposures
  Bupropion 79(18.8)
  Other agent 341 (81.2)
  Total 420 (100)
Bupropion Ingestions
  Seizure 79 (32.2)
  No seizure 166 (67.8)
  Total 245 (100)

Addiction Medicine and Substance Use Disorder Consultation

In 2018, the ToxIC Registry added additional data field questions to more specifically evaluate services performed by medical toxicologists in care of patients with addiction and substance use disorder. While there is clearly overlap in toxicology patients who may have been evaluated for both addiction and another toxicologic indication, a field was added to identify cases in which the primary reason for consultation was related to addiction. In 2018, 244 case entries were identified with addiction as a primary visit indication, of which 146 (60%) were male. The mean age of 38.6 years was the same for both males and females. The majority, 209 (86%) of these encounters were performed as consultation in the Emergency Department or inpatient setting, although 25 (10%) were performed by an admitting Medical Toxicologist.

Opioid agonist initiation using methadone or a buprenorphine product was the most commonly reported consult activity (47%), followed by pain management (14%); counseling/support was reported infrequently (5%). When opioid agonist initiation was reported, the dual product buprenorphine/naloxone was used in 99 (75%) followed by methadone in 20 (15%) and buprenorphine alone in 9 (4%) cases. Naltrexone was used for opioid antagonist initiation in only 4 encounters and was also used for alcohol use disorder in 8 encounters. Adjunct use of clonidine was reported in 17 (13%) cases in which initiation of an opioid agonist occurred. Specific drugs were reported for substance use disorder in 116 (47%) of cases. Heroin was reported most frequently in 72% of cases, 75% of which used the parenteral route. Oxycodone was the second most commonly reported drug (11%). Buprenorphine, fentanyl, methadone, and loperamide were also specifically reported as opioids of abuse. In addition to opioids, ethanol (17%) and stimulants (4%) were also reported.

In addition to the addiction cases, there were 183 cases identified in which treatment of withdrawal or misuse/abuse of substances was the primary indication for the encounter. Sixty-eight of these cases were specifically identified and treated as withdrawal. Table 46 describes the treatments reported in these patients.

Table 46.

Treatment of withdrawal

N (%)a
Opioid withdrawal
  Buprenorphine 31 (43.7)
  Clonidine 21 (29.6)
  Methadone 14 (19.7)
  Naloxone OD kit 3 (4.2)
  Clonazepam 1 (1.4)
  Ondansetron 1 (1.4)
  Total 71 (100)
Ethanol withdrawal
  Naltrexone 3 (42.9)
  Buprenorphine 3 (42.9)
  Clonidine 1 (14.3)
  Total 7 (100)
Sedative-hypnotic withdrawal
  Phenobarbital 1 (33.3)
  Methadone 1 (33.3)
  Clonidine 1 (33.3)
  Total 3 (100)

aPercentage based on the total number of treatments administered (opioid N = 71, ethanol N = 7, sedative-hypnotic N = 3). Fifty-nine (0.8%) registry opioid withdrawal cases, 6 (0.1%) registry ethanol withdrawal cases, and 3 (0.0%) registry sedative-hypnotic cases received at least one type of withdrawal treatment

QCDR

On December 29, 2017 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved the ToxIC Registry as a Qualified Clinical Data Registry (QCDR). A QCDR is a registry recognized by CMS as a tool to collect data on quality metrics. Starting the 2018 calendar year, the ToxIC Qualified Clinical Data Registry (TQCDR) now serves as a platform to report on medical toxicology measures to CMS. Along with approving the QCDR, CMS also approved 6 medical toxicology quality measures (see Table 47). Therefore, ToxIC serves as the data collection tool and reporting mechanism for these quality measures. These toxicology-specific measures allow medical toxicologists to report on measures that matter most to their practices. These are the first measures specifically designed for and by medical toxicologists. In 2018, 44 medical toxicologists participated in the TQCDR.

Table 47.

ToxIC 2018 centers of Medicare and Medicaid services-approved medical toxicology quality measures

Title Numerator Denominator Exclusions
Screening for risk of opioid misuse/overuse Patients who were screened for the potential risk of opioid misuse/overuse with a standardized tool (e.g., DAST, ASSIST) or assessed for the presence of any specific risk factors Patients aged 12 years or older None
Pregnancy test in women who receive a toxicologic consult Patients who receive a pregnancy test prior to emergency department discharge or within 24 h of hospital admission Women of childbearing age (12-60 years) who receive a toxicologic consult Women who have had a hysterectomy or oophorectomy; minor dermal caustic exposure; Woman who are post-menopausal
EKG assessment in acute overdoses Patients who have an EKG QRS and QTC duration assessment within 60 min of arrival to the emergency department All intentional pharmaceutical overdoses of any age Patients who present to the emergency department in cardiac arrest; exploratory pediatric ingestions with non-cardiotoxic ingestions
Appropriate treatment for acute acetaminophen ingestion Patients for whom n-acetylcysteine (NAC) was received within 2 h of presentation and NAC treatment was discontinued appropriately Patients of any age with acetaminophen poisoning receiving IV NAC Patients with an acute single acetaminophen ingestion occurring less than 4 h or more than 24 h prior to presentation;
Patients taking therapeutic doses of acetaminophen;
Patients with hepatic failure as defined by encephalopathy and INR > 1.5
Assessment of suspected ethylene glycol or methanol exposures Patients for whom the appropriate laboratory testing was completed within 4 h of hospital presentation Patients of any age with suspected exposure to ethylene glycol or methanol Serum osmolality and quantitative ethylene glycol/methanol testing not available; unintentional accidental ingestions of ethylene glycol or methanol
Repeat assessment of salicylate concentrations in overdose patients Patients who received a second plasma salicylate concentration within 4 h following the initial test Patients of any age with suspected drug overdose with an initial plasma salicylate concentration > 15 mg/dL Patients who died within 4 h of the initial test; Patients who did not experience a drug overdose; patients on hemodialysis within 4 h of initial test

Limitations

The ToxIC Registry is a unique prospective database of cases in which bedside consultation is performed by medical toxicologists, allowing an informed relationship between exposures and clinical outcomes. There are, however, some limitations within the Registry. One of these is a possible bias towards inclusion of more severe case presentations, since cases are only included if they undergo subspecialty bedside consultation. Cases for which a medical toxicology consultation was not requested are not reported and may represent a group with less severe illness. Therefore, the Registry likely represents a different population from other data sources such as Poison Control Centers. There may also be a disproportionate number of certain cases reported based on regional variations in drug use, abuse, and other toxic exposures. The ToxIC registry includes sites from multiple, diverse locations, but the entire country is not uniformly represented. Larger academic medical centers with greater amounts of medical toxicology faculty may be over-represented in the database.

Additionally, there may be a reporting bias towards more complicated or interesting cases at the level of individual sites. Although the express intent of the Registry, as defined in written agreements with all sites, is to obtain a consecutive sample of all cases at a given site, individual cases may be missed. Data regarding substances of exposure or species of envenomation relies heavily on patient self-report and may be misclassified. Willingness to disclose this information may be particularly true of illicit drug exposure. Lastly, the registry strives to continually improve the quality of data collected. While member sites are instructed to complete all applicable data fields, there are still a number of cases and data fields with incomplete information. This remains an issue for collection of race and ethnicity, for example. Efforts continue to support quality data collection and follow up on missing data where applicable.

Conclusions

The ToxIC Registry continues to be unique among databases in that it represents prospective data collected from cases evaluated at the bedside by medical toxicologists. Although this feature limits extrapolation to the population as a whole, it increases the potential for high quality data and for increased correlation between exposure cases and clinical findings. Continued quality improvement and surveillance efforts remain areas of focus for the Registry.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1 (484.7KB, docx)

(DOCX 484 kb)

Acknowledgments

Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Study Group Collaborators:

Beauchamp GA, Beuhler MC, Boyle KL, Cannon RD, Carey JL, Carpenter J, Chenoweth JA, Colby DK, Eisenga BH, Fisher E, Ford JB, Fox LM, Ganetsky M, Gorodetsky R, Greene SC, Griswold MK, Harding SA, Hendrickson RG, Horowitz BZ, Hoyte C, Jacob J, Judge BS, Kazzi Z, Kerns WP 2nd, Kim T, Koons A, Leikin JB, Levine M, Liss DB, Marino R, McKay CA, McKeever RG, Meadors K, Moore E, Mullins ME, Nacca N, Nelson ME, Porter L, Riley BD, Ruha AM, Santos C, Schult R, Schwarz ES, Scoccimarro A, Seifert SA, Shafer S, Shah KR, Smolinske SC, Spyres M, Tortora L, Vearrier DJ, Warrick BJ, Weiss S, Wolk BJ, Yanta J.

We also wish to thank study coordinators Andrea Ramirez, D Hopkins, DA Gonzalez, Julie Licata, K Hart, Love Wilson, MD Cook, Melissa Vandenberg, PM Beuhler, T Falter and Tammy Phan.

Funding Information

The Toxicology Investigators Consortium received funding from the US National Institute of Drug Abuse 1RO1DA037317-02, and data sharing contracts with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and BTG International, Inc. (North America).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

Previous presentation of data

This data has not been previously presented.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Meghan B. Spyres, Email: mspyres@gmail.com

On behalf of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Study Group:

G. A. Beauchamp, M. C. Beuhler, K. L. Boyle, R. D. Cannon, J. L. Carey, J. Carpenter, J. A. Chenoweth, D. K. Colby, B. H. Eisenga, E. Fisher, J. B. Ford, L. M. Fox, M. Ganetsky, R. Gorodetsky, S. C. Greene, M. K. Griswold, S. A. Harding, R. G. Hendrickson, B. Z. Horowitz, C. Hoyte, J. Jacob, B. S. Judge, Z. Kazzi, W. P. Kerns, T. Kim, A. Koons, J. B. Leikin, M. Levine, D. B. Liss, R. Marino, C. A. McKay, R. G. McKeever, K. Meadors, K. Moore, M. E. Mullins, N. Nacca, M. E. Nelson, L. Porter, B. D. Riley, C. Santos, R. Schult, E. S. Schwarz, A. Scoccimarro, S. A. Seifert, S. Shafer, K. R. Shah, S. C. Smolinske, M. Spyres, L. Tortora, D. J. Vearrier, B. J. Warrick, S. Weiss, B. J. Wolk, and J. Yanta

References

  • 1.Farrugia LA, Rhyee SH, Campleman SL, et al. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry-the 2017 Annual Report. J Med Toxicol. 2018;14(3):182–211. doi: 10.1007/s13181-018-0679-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farrugia LA, Rhyee SH, Calello DP, et al. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry-the 2016 Experience. J Med Toxicol. 2017;13(3):203–226. doi: 10.1007/s13181-017-0627-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rhyee SH, Farrugia L, Wiegand T, et al. The toxicology investigators consortium case registry-the 2013 experience. J Med Toxicol. 2014;10(4):342–359. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0417-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rhyee SH, Farrugia L, Campleman SL, Wax PM, Brent J, Toxicology Investigators C. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry--the 2014 Experience. J Med Toxicol. 2015;11(4):388–409. doi: 10.1007/s13181-015-0507-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Farrugia LA, Rhyee SH, Campleman SL, et al. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry-the 2015 Experience. J Med Toxicol. 2016;12(3):224–247. doi: 10.1007/s13181-016-0580-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wiegand TJ, Wax PM, Schwartz T, et al. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry--the 2011 experience. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(4):360–377. doi: 10.1007/s13181-012-0264-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wiegand T, Wax P, Smith E, Hart K, Brent J. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry--the 2012 experience. J Med Toxicol. 2013;9(4):380–404. doi: 10.1007/s13181-013-0352-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brent J, Wax PM, Schwartz T, et al. The Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case Registry-the 2010 experience. J Med Toxicol. 2011;7(4):266–276. doi: 10.1007/s13181-011-0185-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Spencer MR, Warner M, Bastian BA, Trinidad JP, Hedegaard H. Drug Overdose Deaths Involving Fentanyl, 2011-2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019;68:3):1–3)19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thomas AA, Von Derau K, Bradford MC, Moser E, Garrard A, Mazor S. Unintentional Pediatric Marijuana Exposures Prior to and After Legalization and Commercial Availability of Recreational Marijuana in Washington State. J Emerg Med. 2019;56(4):398–404. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ng PC, Banerji S, Graham J, Leonard J, Wang GS. Adolescent exposures to traditional and novel psychoactive drugs, reported to National Poison Data System (NPDS), 2007-2017. Drug Alcohol DependDrug Alcohol Depend. 2019;202:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kang AM. Substances Involved in Suicidal Poisonings in the United States. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Finkelstein Y, Hutson JR, Wax PM, Brent J. Toxicology Investigators Consortium Case R. Toxico-surveillance of infant and toddler poisonings in the United States. J Med Toxicol. 2012;8(3):263–266. doi: 10.1007/s13181-012-0227-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ESM 1 (484.7KB, docx)

(DOCX 484 kb)


Articles from Journal of Medical Toxicology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES