Abstract
Background:
The reason for the high incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in Xianyou County of China was largely unknown. We aimed to explore the potential sociodemographic risk factors and their associations to GC.
Methods:
A population-based case-control study was conducted during March 2013 and April 2016 in Xianyou County. All newly diagnosed patients of GC were recruited as cases, while controls were selected by matching for cases’ sex, age (± 3 years) and the place of residence.
Results:
A total of 523 GC cases and 523 matched healthy controls were included in the final analysis with mean age of 66.27±8.81 years for cases and 66.31±8.83 years for controls, respectively. Participants with low socioeconomic status were observed with higher GC risk compared to those in high socioeconomic status (adjusted OR=2.10, 95% CI: 1.13-3.89). Compared to those regularly drink green tea, patients did not have this dietary habit had nearly 3-fold increased GC risk (adjusted OR=2.91, 95% CI: 1.38-6.13). Other dietary habit, including consumption of hard food, omission of breakfast, consumption of pickled vegetables 30 years ago, overeating were all associated with increased risk of GC. Interaction effect were found. Patients in low socioeconomic status and skipped breakfast had 10-fold higher risk of GC compared to reference group in high socioeconomic status and eat breakfast regularly (OR=10.71, 95% CI: 5.19-22.10). Furthermore, patients in low socioeconomic status and consumed pickled vegetable 30 years ago had 6-fold higher risk of GC compared to those in high socioeconomic status but did not intake pickled vegetables 30 years ago (OR=6.11, 95% CI: 3.87-9.66).
Conclusion:
High incidence of GC risk in Xianyou County might be partly attributed to various sociodemographic factors. Specific prevention effort could be target on population in low socioeconomic status combined with habit of breakfast omission or intake of pickled vegetables.
Keywords: Stomach cancer, risk factors, case-control study, interaction
Introduction
Background
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, although the incidence of GC showed a significant decreasing trend in the past few decades (Pisani et al., 1999). A large number of clinical studies showed that five-year survival rate of patients with advanced GC were generally less than 20%, while the five-year survival rate for early GC is more than 90% (La Torre et al., 2011). Therefore, early prevention of GC is valuable to improve the prognosis of GC, especially in areas with high incidence of GC.
GC is a multifactorial disease, and both environmental (68%) and genetic factors (22%) have a role in its etiology (Kelley and Duggan, 2003). The established risk factor of GC, most notably H.pylori infection could not fully explain the heterogeneity in its distribution (Karimi et al., 2014). Only a small proportion of people who carry H.pylori in their stomachs develop GC, suggesting that other factors, such as sociodemographic and dietary factors, may be responsible in cocarcinogenesis (Peek and Blaser, 2002). Several dietary intakes and dietary habits have been widely observed associated with increased risk of GC, including smoking, alcohol drinking, and intake of salty food.
Xianyou County locates on the southeast coast of China. According to our earlier study during 2011 and 2012, GC was the leading cause of death in this area (Li et al., 2017). The mortality rate of GC was 49.47/100,000 in Xianyou County, which was two times higher than the Chinese national average level (21.9/100,000) (Li et al., 2017). H.pylori infection cannot fully explain the high incidence of GC in Xianyou. Sociodemographic factors and life styles were suggested to associate with high incidence of GC in Xianyou County but evidence is lack. Similar to many other high-risk areas of China, pickled vegetables were commonly consumed in Xianyou County as an important part of family diet. A recent meta-analysis study had proved that high consumption of pickled vegetables indeed increase the GC risk in China (OR=1.86, 95% CI 1.61–2.15) (Ren et al., 2012). On the other hand, green tea is also commonly consumed by residents in Xianyou County. Many epidemiological studies on the correlation between green tea and the risk of GC have been reported, but their results are inconsistent (Setiawan et al., 2001; Mao et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015b). Other sociodemographic factors such as low socioeconomic status might also contribute to high incidence of GC. However, the potential role of various sociodemographic factors is still largely unknown in Xianyou County.
Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the associations between potential sociodemographic factors and GC risk in Xianyou County of Southeastern China.
Materials and Methods
Study design and study population
A population-based case-control study of GC was conducted in Xianyou County between March 2013 and April 2016. All newly diagnosed cases of GC that were aged ≥18 years and have been lived in Xianyou for at least 10 years were eligible. Patients who had history of cancer, mental illness, and those unable to complete the questionnaire were excluded. Control subjects were individually selected from the same residence town of matched case patient or from the town with similar incidence of GC , matching for sex and age (±3 years). We divided Xianyou County into three groups of region (high, middle, and low incidence area) based on the standardized mortality rate of GC that was reported in our previously study (Huang et al., 2016). Eligible controls must have also been resided in Xianyou County for at least 10 years and haven’t been diagnosed with GC.
Data collection
All cases and controls were personally interviewed by strictly trained research nurses from Xianyou hospital. A structured questionnaire consisted of 337 items under 8 categories was used for the data collection. For case group, cancer related diagnosis and treatment i.e., surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy were obtained from medical record.
During the interview, participants were asked about their 1) general demographic information, including age (years), height (meter), weight (kg), marital status (yes, no), education level (formal or primary education), monthly income (<600, ≥600 RMB); 2) occupational history, including profession type (farmer, not farmer), pesticide exposure at work (yes, no); 3) lifetime smoking habits (yes, no), lifetime use of alcohol (yes, no), and tea consumption (yes, no); 4) dietary habit; 5) drinking water and living condition; 6) medical history including personal disease record, medication, and family history of cancer) and 7) mental health.
Regarding dietary habit, participants were asked if they have changed their dietary habit in the past 5 years. If the dietary habit has not been changed in the past 5 years, participants were required to answer the questionnaire mainly based on their dietary habit in the past 1-2 year. If the dietary habit has been changed, participants were requested to report their dietary habit one year before the dietary habit change. Given that the dietary change has occurred more than 5 years, participants were still asked to report their dietary habit in the recent 1-2 years. It should be noted that, few questions concerning dietary habits at 10 years before the interview were also asked. In addition to the main questionnaire, a supplementary questionnaire concerning consumption of pickle vegetables was also used, in which participants were asked their consumption of pickle vegetables 30 years and 15 years before interview. It is generally believed that atypical hyperplasia evolved into GC for about 3-5 years, while intestinal metaplasia evolving into GC about 10-20 years. Therefore, our study investigated the effects of factors on GC over the past thirty years, in order to provide intervention for GC on time window. Patient consents were obtained from all participants at the beginning of study enrollment. Smokers were confirmed if at least one cigarette per day were consumed and lasted for at least half year. Drinking tea was defined as yes if at least one cup of tea per week was consumed, lasting for at least half year.
Statistical analysis
Socioeconomic status was classified into two categories (high and low) based on the monthly income. The income cut-points were 3,000 RMB and 2,000 RMB for socioeconomic status at investigation and in 10 years ago, respectively. Body mass index was classified into four groups: <18.5, 18.5-24, 24-28 and ≥ 28 kg/m2.
T-test was used to compare continuous valuables, while χ2 test was used to compare the discrete variables. To assess the relative risk between demographic and dietary factors and GC, unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All reported p-values were two-tailed, and those p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. The SPSS 20.0 software was used for all analyses. This study was approved by Ethics Committee of Fujian Medical University.
Results
Demographic characteristics of the subjects
A total of 523 GC cases and 523 matched controls were included in the final analysis from low (18.7%), medium (33.3%) and high (48%) incidence areas. The mean age was 66.27±8.81 years for cases and 66.31±8.83 years for controls, respectively (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference in age and family GC history (p>0.05). The distribution of BMI, H. Pylori infection was statistically significant between case and control groups (both p <0.05). Higher prevalence of chronic atrophic gastritis was observed in cases (10.33%) in compared to controls (5.54%). Controls tend to have more education, married or lived with partner, had higher socioeconomic status, or drink green tea (all p<0.05) than cases. Cases consumed more hot food, hard food, salty food, vinegar, pickled vegetables, and tend to eat quickly, skip breakfast, eat too much in contrast to controls (all p<0.05).
Table 1.
Baseline Characteristics of Gastric Cancer Cases and Controls in a Chinese Population-based Case-control Study
| Characteristics | Control | Case | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number (%) | Number (%) | ||
| Sex | - | ||
| Male | 392 (74.95) | 392 (74.95) | |
| Female | 131 (25.05) | 131 (25.05) | |
| Age (year) | 0.62 | ||
| < 60 | 120 (22.94) | 126 (24.09) | |
| 60-65 | 118 (22.56) | 101 (19.31) | |
| 65-70 | 140 (26.77) | 149 (28.49) | |
| ≥70 | 145 (27.72) | 147 (28.11) | |
| Age (year) (mean±SD)1 | 66.31±8.83 | 66.27±8.81 | |
| BMI (kg/m2)2 | < 0.001 | ||
| < 18.5 | 47 (8.99) | 97 (18.55) | |
| 18.5-24 | 341 (65.20) | 370 (70.75) | |
| 24-28 | 116 (22.18) | 53 (10.13) | |
| ≥ 28 | 19 (3.63) | 3 (0.57) | |
| H. Pylori infection | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 36 (6.88) | 56 (10.71) | |
| No | 138 (26.39) | 398 (76.10) | |
| Unknown | 349 (66.73) | 69 (13.19) | |
| Family history of gastric cancer | 0.3 | ||
| Yes | 111 (21.22) | 125 (23.90) | |
| No | 412 (78.78) | 398 (76.10) | |
| Chronic atrophic gastritis | 0.004 | ||
| Yes | 29 (5.54) | 54 (10.33) | |
| No | 494 (94.46) | 469 (89.64) | |
| Tumor location | |||
| Cardia | NA | 35 (6.69) | |
| Non-cardia | NA | 488 (93.31) | |
| Formal or primary education | 0.004 | ||
| Yes | 157 (30.02) | 116 (22.18) | |
| No | 366 (69.98) | 407 (77.82) | |
| Farmer | 0.45 | ||
| Yes | 386 (73.80) | 375 (71.70) | |
| No | 137 (26.20) | 148 (28.30) | |
| Married or living with a partner | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 489 (93.50) | 455 (87.00) | |
| No | 34 (6.50) | 68 (13.00) | |
| Socioeconomic status of now | < 0.001 | ||
| High | 376 (71.89) | 277 (52.96) | |
| Low | 147 (28.11) | 246 (47.04) | |
| Socioeconomic status 10 years ago | < 0.001 | ||
| High | 282 (53.92) | 143 (27.34) | |
| Low | 241 (46.08) | 380 (72.66) | |
| Smoking | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 265 (50.67) | 308 (58.89) | |
| No | 258 (49.33) | 215 (41.11) | |
| Alcohol intake | 0.11 | ||
| Yes | 94 (17.97) | 75 (14.34) | |
| No | 429 (82.03) | 448 (85.66) | |
| Consumption of green tea | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 148 (28.30) | 75 (14.34) | |
| No | 375 (71.70) | 448 (85.66) | |
| Eating quickly | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 430 (82.22) | 485 (92.73) | |
| No | 93 (17.78) | 38 (7.27) | |
| Irregular eating habit | 0.4 | ||
| Yes | 395 (75.53) | 383 (73.23) | |
| No | 128 (24.47) | 140 (26.77) | |
| Consumption of very hot food | 0.02 | ||
| Yes | 475 (90.82) | 495 (94.65) | |
| No | 48 (9.18) | 28 (5.35) | |
| Consumption of very hard food | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 414 (79.16) | 483 (92.35) | |
| No | 109 (20.84) | 40 (7.65) | |
| Consumption of very salty food | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 159 (30.40) | 213 (40.73) | |
| No | 364 (69.60) | 309 (59.08) | |
| Consumption of very spicy food | 0.13 | ||
| Yes | 148 (28.30) | 126 (24.09) | |
| No | 374 (71.51) | 395 (75.53) | |
| Consumption of vinegar | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 217 (41.49) | 135 (25.81) | |
| No | 305 (58.32) | 388 (74.19) | |
| Omission of breakfast | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 216 (41.30) | 382 (73.04) | |
| No | 307 (58.70) | 141 (26.96) | |
| Consumption of pickled vegetable 30 years ago | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 171 (32.70) | 270 (51.63) | |
| No | 352 (67.30) | 253 (48.37) | |
| Overeating | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 151 (28.87) | 210 (40.15) | |
| No | 368 (70.36) | 310 (59.27) | |
| Working after eating immediately | 0.1 | ||
| Yes | 331 (63.29) | 356 (68.07) | |
| No | 192 (36.71) | 167 (31.93) | |
| Family disharmony | < 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 67 (12.81) | 207 (39.58) | |
| No | 456 (87.19) | 316 (60.42) | |
| Mental stimulation or trauma | 0.001 | ||
| Yes | 472 (90.25) | 500 (95.60) | |
| No | 51 (9.75) | 23 (4.40) |
. SD, standard deviation;
. BMI, body mass index.
Logistic regression analysis for risk factors of GC
Participants with low socioeconomic status 30 years ago were observed with higher GC risk compared to those in high socioeconomic status (adjusted OR=2.10, 95% CI: 1.13-3.89) (Table 2). Non-smokers had reduced risk of GC compared to smokers (adjusted OR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.25-1.01). Compared to those regularly drink green tea, patients did not have this dietary habit had nearly 3-fold increased GC risk (adjusted OR=2.91, 95% CI: 1.38-6.13). Other dietary habit, including consumption of hard food, omission of breakfast, consumption of pickled vegetables 30 years ago, overeating were all associated with risk of GC. Compared to those having dietary habit of consuming very hard food, pickled vegetable 30 years ago, overeating, patients did not have these dietary habit were all observed with 50% decreased risk of GC. Family disharmony and mental stimulation or trauma was also associated with increased risk of GC. Compared to those experienced family disharmony, patient in harmony family had OR of 0.25 (95% CI: 0.12-0.51). Patients without metal stimulation or trauma had only 27% of GC risk compared to those had these psychological stress (adjusted OR=0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.93).
Table 2.
Association between Sociodemographic Characteristics and Risk of Gastric Cancer
| Variables | OR1 (95% CI) | p value | OR2 (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formal or primary education | 0.54 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 1.70 (1.13-2.58) | 0.01 | 0.80 (0.38-1.65) | |
| Farmer | 0.87 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.99 (0.66-1.50) | 0.97 | 0.95 (0.49-1.82) | |
| Married or living with a partner | 0.15 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 2.41 (1.28-4.54) | 0.006 | 1.98 (0.78-5.05) | |
| Socioeconomic status of now | 0.14 | |||
| High | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Low | 2.56 (1.71-3.83) | < 0.001 | 1.73 (0.84-3.59) | |
| Socioeconomic status 10 years ago | 0.02 | |||
| High | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Low | 2.89 (1.99-4.19) | < 0.001 | 2.10 (1.13-3.89) | |
| Smoking | 0.05 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.60 (0.38-0.94) | 0.03 | 0.51 (0.25-1.01) | |
| Alcohol intake | 0.91 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.85 (0.51-1.40) | 0.51 | 0.96 (0.45-2.05) | |
| Green tea intake | 0.005 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 2.67 (1.63-4.37) | < 0.001 | 2.91 (1.38-6.13) | |
| Eating quickly | 0.57 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.44 (0.26-0.75) | 0.003 | 0.57 (0.24-1.34) | |
| Irregular eating habit | 0.62 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.99 (0.66-1.47) | 0.95 | 0.85 (0.46-1.59) | |
| Consumption of hot food | 0.62 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.58 (0.30-1.11) | 0.10 | 0.79 (0.31-2.02) | |
| Consumption of | hard food | 0.04 | ||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.26 (0.15-0.45) | < 0.001 | 0.45 (0.21-0.98) | |
| Consumption of salty food | 0.56 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.62 (0.43-0.89) | 0.01 | 0.85 (0.48-1.49) | |
| Consumption of spicy food | 0.61 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.99 (0.66-1.48) | 0.95 | 0.83 (0.42-1.67) | |
| Consumption of vinegar | 0.06 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 1.75 (1.20-2.57) | 0.004 | 1.85 (0.98-3.47) | |
| Omission of breakfast | < 0.001 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.21 (0.14-0.32) | < 0.001 | 0.33 (0.19-0.58) | |
| Consumption of pickled vegetable 30 years ago | < 0.001 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.45 (0.32-0.64) | < 0.001 | 0.35 (0.20-0.63) | |
| Overeating | 0.04 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.63 (0.43-0.93) | 0.02 | 0.54 (0.30-0.97) | |
| Working after eating immediately | 0.16 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.54 (0.36-0.81) | 0.003 | 0.63 (0.33-1.20) | |
| Family disharmony | < 0.001 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.14 (0.08-0.24) | < 0.001 | 0.25 (0.12-0.51) | |
| Mental stimulation or trauma | 0.04 | |||
| Yes | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| No | 0.27 (0.12-0.58) | 0.001 | 0.27 (0.08-0.93) |
, Crude odd ratio;
, Adjusted to body mass index, H, Pylori infection, family history of gastric cancer, and chronic atrophic gastritis.
Interaction analysis
The GMDR model was introduced to investigate the interaction of sociodemographic characteristics -dietary factors- behavioral habits-psychological interaction on the GC risk. The results obtained from GMDR analysis for factors interactions were summarized in Table 3. We found the optimal model was socioeconomic status 10 years ago-omission of breakfast- consumption of pickled vegetable 30 years ago, which showed the best cross-validation consistency (10/10), and the highest testing accuracy (0.828). Furthermore, the interaction between this model had a statistically significant effect on GC (p=0.001).
Table 3.
GMDR Analysis on the Best Interaction Models
| Best combination | Testing accuracy | Cross-validation accuracy | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.815 | 10/1 | 0.001 |
| 1, 2 | 0.815 | 9/1 | 0.001 |
| 1, 2, 3 | 0.828 | 10/1 | 0.001 |
| 1, 2, 3, 4 | 0.819 | 6/1 | 0.001 |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 | 0.825 | 7/1 | 0.001 |
1, Represents socioeconomic status in 10 years ago; 2, Represents omission of breakfast; 3, Represents consumption of pickled vegetable 30 years ago; 4, Represents smoking; 5, Represents overeating; 6, Represents working after eating immediately.
Table 4 displayed the conjoint analysis to further illustrate the interaction correlation between the detected three factors in GMDR model. In participants with high socioeconomic status, omission of breakfast increased the risk of GC (OR=2.20, 95% CI: 1.31-3.68). Patients in low socioeconomic status and skip breakfast had 10-fold higher risk of GC compared to reference group with high socioeconomic status and eat breakfast regularly (OR=10.71, 95% CI: 5.19-22.10). Furthermore, patients in low socioeconomic status and consumed pickled vegetable in 30 years ago had 6-fold higher risk of GC compared to those in high socioeconomic status but did not intake pickled vegetables (OR=6.11, 95% CI: 3.87-9.66). Interestingly, among patients without intake habit of pickled vegetables 30 years ago, those skipped breakfast had OR of 5.85 (95% CI: 2.77-12.35) in compared to those did not skip breakfast. In the additive interaction analysis, highest RERI was observed in the interaction between socioeconomic status in 10 years ago and omission of breakfast (RERI=6.61, 95% CI: -1.09-14.31), followed by socioeconomic status in 10 years ago and pickled vegetables consumption 30 years ago (RERI=3.35, 95% CI: 1.23-5.48) (Table 5).
Table 4.
Conjoint Analysis for Socioeconomic Status 10 Years ago, Omission of Breakfast and Consumption of Pickled Vegetable 30 Years ago Using Logistic Regression
| Variables | Case | Control | OR1 (95%CI) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomic status in 10 years ago | Omission of breakfast | ||||
| High | No | 204 | 351 | 1.00 | |
| High | Yes | 37 | 29 | 2.20 (1.31-3.68) | 0.003 |
| Low | No | 226 | 134 | 2.90 (2.21-3.82) | < 0.001 |
| Low | Yes | 56 | 9 | 10.71 (5.19-22.10) | < 0.001 |
| Socioeconomic status 10 years ago | Consumption of pickled vegetable 30 years ago | ||||
| High | No | 50 | 114 | 1.00 | |
| High | Yes | 191 | 266 | 1.64 (1.12-2.40) | 0.011 |
| Low | No | 142 | 53 | 2.12 (1.47-3.05) | < 0.001 |
| Low | Yes | 331 | 356 | 6.11 (3.87-9.66) | < 0.001 |
| Consumption of pickled vegetable 30 years ago | Omission of breakfast | ||||
| No | No | 144 | 158 | 1.00 | |
| Yes | No | 286 | 327 | 0.96 (0.73-1.27) | 0.77 |
| No | Yes | 48 | 9 | 5.85 (2.77-12.35) | < 0.001 |
| Yes | Yes | 45 | 29 | 1.70 (1.01-2.86) | 0.04 |
1. Adjust for body mass index, H. Pylori infection, family history of gastric cancer, and chronic atrophic gastritis.
Table 5.
Add Interaction Analysis for Socioeconomic Status 10 Years ago, Breakfast and Consumption of Pickled Vegetable in 30 Years ago
| Variables | RERI (95%CI) | AP (95%CI) | S (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomic status 10 years ago | Breakfast | 6.61 (-1.09-14.31) | 0.62 (0.32-0.91) | 3.13 (1.30-7.54) |
| Socioeconomic status 10 years ago | Pickled vegetable intake 30 years ago | 3.35 (1.23-5.48) | 0.55 (0.38-0.72) | 2.91 (1.68-5.04) |
| Pickled vegetable intake 30 years ago | Breakfast | -4.19 (-8.60-0.21) | -2.46 (-5.40-0.48) | 0.14 (0.03-0.60) |
Disscussion
In the current study, we found that socioeconomic status 10 years ago, smoking, consumption of green tea, consumption of very hard food, omission of breakfast, consumption of pickled vegetables 30 years ago, overeating, family disharmony and psychological trauma were associated with the risk of GC in Xianyou County. The effect of low socioeconomic status 10 years ago on the development of GC was exacerbated by omission of breakfast, as well as the consumption of pickled vegetables 30 years ago.
Our study confirmed that GC was associated with low socioeconomic status, which is in line with previous studies (Khatami and Karbakhsh, 2015). A recent meta-analysis also observed an increased risk of GC among the lowest education (OR=2.97, 95% CI: 1.923-4.58), occupation (OR=2.64, 95% CI: 2.57-7.29) and overall socioeconomic status (OR=2.64, 95% CI: 1.05-6.63) (Khatami and Karbakhsh, 2015). As lower socioeconomic status was associated with GC risk factors including H. pylori infection, genetic inheritance and lifestyle factors, the effect of lower socioeconomic status might therefore be mediated partly through these risk factors (Khatami and Karbakhsh, 2015).
A bordering statistically significant association was observed between smoking and risk of GC in the current study. Although the causing role of smoking was well established in many other cancers , it was not until 2002 that the International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that there was “sufficient” evidence of causality between smoking and GC (Humans, 2010). A recent meta-analysis of cohort studies reported that GC was increased by only 60% (RR: 1.6) in male smokers and 20% (RR: 1.2) in female smokers compared with never smokers, and the associations were even weaker in former smokers (Ladeiras-Lopes et al., 2008). Although the results are inconsistent, overall the accumulated data suggest that smoking is a risk factor for both cardia and noncardia GC (Freedman et al., 2007; Ladeiras-Lopes et al., 2008; Cook et al., 2010). Previous experiments demonstrated that the poly- phenols in green tea had antioxidant effects and could suppress the occurrence and development of cancer (Srivastava et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015a). The inverse association between green tea consumption and risk of GC has been frequently reported in Chinese population as early as year 1996 and in the recent decades (Ji et al., 1996; Setiawan et al., 2001; Nechuta et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015b). However, many cohort studied in Japanese population did not found such an association (Galanis et al., 1998; Tsubono et al., 2001). The dose of green tea and duration of tea intake habit were believed to explain the differences. When the green tea exposure consumed in a low dose (≤ 4 cups/day), the protective effect on gastric cancer might not be strong (Huang et al., 2017). In contrast, when green tea was consumed ≥ 5 cups/day, GC risk was decreased (Tsubono et al., 2001; Huang et al., 2017). It however shall be noted that, hot and very hot tea temperature was significantly related to high risk of GC (Mao et al., 2011). The explanation might be that hot food could cause chronic thermal injury to the upper digestive tract and therefore make it more susceptible to carcinogenesis. Furthermore, we also observed that dietary habit of hard food could also increase the risk of GC, which might be due to the chronic injury to gastric mucosa. Pickled vegetables were eaten 9 to 12 months a year in high-risk area of China (Yang, 1980). High concentration of carcinogenic compounds such as N-nitroso compounds and mycotoxins were the toxic effect of pickled vegetables (Yang, 1980; Cheng et al., 1981; Zhang et al., 1983; Ren et al., 2012). A recent meta-analysis study analyzing 60 English and Chinese studies reported an overall OR of 1.52 (95% CI: 1.37-1.68) (Ren et al., 2012), which was in line to another meta-analysis focusing on 14 Japanese and Korean studies (OR=1.28, 95% CI: 1.05-1.53) (Kim et al., 2010).
We observed that low socioeconomic status 10 years ago combined with breakfast omission have the highest GC risk, compared to high socioeconomic status 10 years ago with having breakfast, which indicated a strong interaction effect between low socioeconomic status and omission of breakfast. The omission of breakfast might be more common in patients in lower social class or low level education.
Our study has several strengths, including large sample size, matching for age, sex and region individually and availability of H. pylori infection. All cases were diagnosed using uniform criteria. However, similar to other case-control studies, our study is also limited by recall bias when answering questionnaire and selection bias (Moradzadeh et al., 2015; Moradzadeh et al., 2018).
In conclusion, socioeconomic status 10 years ago, smoking, consumption of green tea, consumption of very hard food, omission of breakfast, consumption of pickled vegetables 30 years ago, overeating, family disharmony and psychological trauma were associated with the risk of GC in Xianyou County. Specific prevention effort could be focused on population with habit of skipping breakfast combined with low socioeconomic status or intake of pickled vegetables.
Funding
The current study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2015J01673; 2017J01811) and Xianyou County Government of Putian, Fujian, China (Grant No. 2013B008).
Authors’ contributions
The authors’ contributions to this study were as follow: study design, PC, YLL, KCZ, CCW, BYL, WY and YHC; data collection, PC, CCW, BYL, WY and YHC; statistical analysis PC and YLL; manuscript writing by all authors.
Conflicts of Interest
None of authors had a personal or financial conflict of interest.
Supplementary
Acknowledgments
We appreciate all participants and investigators from the Xianyou Hospital.
References
- 1.Cheng SJ, Sala M, Li MH, et al. Promoting effect of Roussin's red identified in pickled vegetables from Linxian China. Carcinogenesis. 1981;2:313–9. doi: 10.1093/carcin/2.4.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cook MB, Kamangar F, Whiteman DC, et al. Cigarette smoking and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: a pooled analysis from the international BEACON consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1344–53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Freedman ND, Abnet CC, Leitzmann MF, et al. A prospective study of tobacco, alcohol, and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer subtypes. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1424–33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Galanis DJ, Kolonel LN, Lee J, et al. Intakes of selected foods and beverages and the incidence of gastric cancer among the Japanese residents of Hawaii: a prospective study. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27:173–80. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.2.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang T, Zhou F, Wang-Johanning F, et al. Depression accelerates the development of gastric cancer through reactive oxygen speciesactivated ABL1 (Review) Oncol Rep. 2016;36:2435–43. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Huang Y, Chen H, Zhou L, et al. Association between green tea intake and risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20:3183–92. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017002208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Humans IWGotEoCRt. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Ingested nitrate and nitrite, and cyanobacterial peptide toxins. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010;94:1–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ji BT, Chow WH, Yang G, et al. The influence of cigarette smoking, alcohol, and green tea consumption on the risk of carcinoma of the cardia and distal stomach in Shanghai, China. Cancer. 1996;77:2449–57. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960615)77:12<2449::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Karimi P, Islami F, Anandasabapathy S, et al. Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:700–13. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kelley JR, Duggan JM. Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1–9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00534-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Khatami F, Karbakhsh M. Socioeconomic position and incidence of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69:818–9. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kim HJ, Lim SY, Lee JS, et al. Fresh and pickled vegetable consumption and gastric cancer in Japanese and Korean populations: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer Sci. 2010;101:508–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01374.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.La Torre M, Rossi Del Monte S, Ferri M, et al. Peritoneal washing cytology in gastric cancer. How, when and who will get a benefit? A review. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2011;57:43–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ladeiras-Lopes R, Pereira AK, Nogueira A, et al. Smoking and gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19:689–701. doi: 10.1007/s10552-008-9132-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li D, Wu C, Cai Y, et al. Association of NFKB1 and NFKBIA gene polymorphisms with susceptibility of gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317717107. doi: 10.1177/1010428317717107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mao XQ, Jia XF, Zhou G, et al. Green tea drinking habits and gastric cancer in southwest China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2011;12:2179–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, et al. Misclassification adjustment of family history of breast cancer in a case-control study: a Bayesian Approach. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:8221–6. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moradzadeh R, Mansournia MA, Baghfalaki T, et al. The impact of maternal smoking during pregnancy on childhood asthma: adjusted for exposure misclassification;results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2012. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28:697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nechuta S, Shu XO, Li HL, et al. Prospective cohort study of tea consumption and risk of digestive system cancers: results from the Shanghai Women's Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96:1056–63. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peek RM, Jr, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:28–37. doi: 10.1038/nrc703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, et al. Estimates of the worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:18–29. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19990924)83:1<18::aid-ijc5>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ren JS, Kamangar F, Forman D, et al. Pickled food and risk of gastric cancer--a systematic review and meta-analysis of English and Chinese literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:905–15. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Setiawan VW, Zhang ZF, Yu GP, et al. Protective effect of green tea on the risks of chronic gastritis and stomach cancer. Int J Cancer. 2001;92:600–4. doi: 10.1002/ijc.1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Srivastava AK, Bhatnagar P, Singh M, et al. Synthesis of PLGA nanoparticles of tea polyphenols and their strong in vivo protective effect against chemically induced DNA damage. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:1451–62. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S26364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tsubono Y, Nishino Y, Komatsu S, et al. Green tea and the risk of gastric cancer in Japan. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:632–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103013440903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang D, Wang Y, Wan X, et al. Green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate triggered hepatotoxicity in mice: responses of major antioxidant enzymes and the Nrf2 rescue pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015a;283:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Y, Duan H, Yang H. A case-control study of stomach cancer in relation to Camellia sinensis in China. Surg Oncol. 2015b;24:67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang CS. Research on esophageal cancer in China: a review. Cancer Res. 1980;40:2633–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhang WX, Xu MS, Wang GH, et al. Quantitative analysis of Roussin red methyl ester in pickled vegetables. Cancer Res. 1983;43:339–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.