Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Dec 16;48(6):1521–1522. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0840-x

Correction to: A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes

Wouter Hoogkamer 1,, Shalaya Kipp 1, Jesse H Frank 1, Emily M Farina 2, Geng Luo 2, Rodger Kram 1
PMCID: PMC6828102  PMID: 29249085

Correction to: Sports Med 10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2

An Online First version of this article was made available online at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-017-0811-2 on 16 November 2017. An error was subsequently identified in the article, and the following correction should be noted:

In Table 1 of the original publication, an error was made in unit conversion. Values in the row entitled ‘ECOT’ should have been further multiplied by 60 min/h and divided by 1000 m/km. A correct version of Table 1 is provided below:

Table 1.

Energetic costs, rates of oxygen uptake (V˙O2), energetics cost of transport (ECOT) and oxygen costs of transport (O2COT) for each of the three shoe models at all three speeds

14 km/h 16 km/h 18 km/h
NS AB NP NS AB NP NS AB NP
Pmet (W/kg) 14.17 ± 0.82 14.13 ± 0.84 13.57 ± 0.76 17.07 ± 1.02 17.03 ± 1.02 16.36 ± 0.99 20.26 ± 1.06 20.25 ± 1.18 19.42 ± 1.08
V˙O2 (mL O2/kg/min) 41.97 ± 2.39 41.87 ± 2.45 40.24 ± 2.19 50.30 ± 2.91 50.19 ± 2.92 48.27 ± 2.87 59.62 ± 3.08 59.57 ± 3.40 57.26 ± 3.10
ECOT (J/kg/m) 3.64 ± 0.21 3.63 ± 0.22 3.49 ± 0.19 3.84 ± 0.23 3.83 ± 0.23 3.68 ± 0.22 4.05 ± 0.21 4.05 ± 0.24 3.88 ± 0.22
O2COT (mL O2/kg/km) 179.9 ± 10.25 179.4 ± 2.45 172.5 ± 9.40 188.6 ± 10.90 188.2 ± 10.95 181.0 ± 10.58 198.7 ± 10.27 198.6 ± 11.34 190.9 ± 10.35

Values presented are mean ± SD

AB adidas adizero Adios BOOST 2, NP Nike prototype, NS Nike Zoom Streak 6


Articles from Sports Medicine (Auckland, N.z.) are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES