Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2017 Feb 10;38(1):61–62. doi: 10.1007/s11017-017-9397-9

Erratum to: The causal explanatory functions of medical diagnoses

Hane Htut Maung 1,
PMCID: PMC6828132  PMID: 28188421

Erratum to: Theor Med Bioeth DOI 10.1007/s11017-016-9377-5

In my article [1], I cite a passage from Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh’s Handbook of Analytic Philosophy of Medicine [2]. The third page of the article contains a reference to and a brief quotation from Sadegh-Zadeh’s book, stating that it is “usually required that the diagnosis causally explain that patient data” [2, p. 329]. It has been brought to my attention that this could be construed as misrepresenting Sadegh-Zadeh’s thesis in his book. I wish here to remedy this oversight with sincere apologies to the author. The above passage comes from only a single place in Sadegh-Zadeh’s book and comprises a description of the customary view, not his endorsement of it. In several places in the same book, Sadegh-Zadeh argues that the customary view is wrong and that causal explanation of patient data by the diagnosis is not possible because the laws which such explanations require are absent in medicine. Any such misrepresentation in my brief reference to Sadegh-Zadeh’s work was entirely unintended. This oversight does not affect the arguments and conclusions of my article, for I agree that causal explanatory functions of diagnoses cannot be in virtue of general covering laws.

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11017-016-9377-5.

References

  • 1.Maung HH. The causal explanatory functions of medical diagnoses. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s11017-016-9377-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sadegh-Zadeh K. Handbook of analytic philosophy of medicine. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES