Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2019 Jun 29;20(6):970–974. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01030-4

Correction to: A Cost Analysis of School-Based Lifestyle Interventions

Marije Oosterhoff 1,, Hans Bosma 2, Onno C P van Schayck 3, Manuela A Joore 1
PMCID: PMC6828325  PMID: 31254132

Correction to: Prevention Science (2018) 19:716–727

10.1007/s11121-018-0918-1

In the article, ‘A Cost Analysis of School-Based Lifestyle Interventions’, we calculated the societal costs of two school-based lifestyle interventions: ‘the Healthy Primary School of the Future’ and ‘the Physical Activity School’. Unfortunately, it became clear to us that the cost calculation for the Physical Activity Schools was not entirely correct.

It was stated that the length of the school day was extended at Healthy Primary Schools of the Future and at Physical Activity Schools to facilitate the implementation of activities. The length of the school day was valued in the cost calculations as it might result in increased productivity of primary caregivers (e.g. more possibilities for work). However, at Physical Activity Schools the length school day did not became longer in comparison to control schools.

As a sensitivity analysis we excluded the value of the extended school day. This was done as the value of this cost item is highly uncertain (e.g. gains in productivity of primary caregivers could be offset by potential utility losses). The results of this sensitivity analysis are therefore now representative of the updated base-case results for the Physical Activity Schools. Table 2 represents the costs of HPSF and PAS for the first year of implementation. When excluding the value of the extended school day for PAS, the costs amounted to €505 per child per year or €3.16 per child per day. In the hypothetical steady state, the costs were €346 per child per year or €2.16 per child per day (Table 3).

In the article, we concluded that the costs for the education sector were fully compensated for the Physical Activity School and almost fully compensated for the Healthy Primary School of the Future by the savings within the household sector. Based on the updated calculations, we conclude that a small investment is required for the delivery of the Physical Activity School (€2.16 per child per day for the Physical Activity School and €0.96 for the Healthy Primary School of the Future).

[1] Oosterhoff, M., Bosma, H., van Schayck, O.C.P., Joore, M.A. (2018). A cost analysis of school-based lifestyle interventions. Prevention Science, 19, 716–727.

Table 2.

Per child costs of HPSF and PAS for the first year after implementation

Cost items for the first year after implementation Time investment Volume (per school) Unit price Stakeholder perspective
Education Household & leisure Labour & social security Healthcare Societal perspective
HPSF PAS HPSF PAS HPSF PAS HPSF PAS HPSF PAS
Personnel
 Program coordinator Coordination 4 schools: 1 FTE €112,000 / FTE 1 €84 €84
  School project leaders Coordination HPSF: 0.5 FTE; PAS: 0.4 FTE €65,000 / FTE 1 €97 €78
  Volunteers Assisting during lunch break and activities

Financial compensation:

HPSF: €12,645 1

PAS: €8145 1

€38 €24 €53 A €17 A

Time investment

HPSF: 12 volunteers, 1 h/day,

4 days/week (upper grades 5 days/week), 40 weeks

PAS: 7 volunteers, 1 h/day,

3 days/week (upper grades 4 days/week), 40 weeks

Time investment

€14 / hour 4

  Primary caregivers Per child fee for supervision during lunch break 4 times / week, 40 weeks €1 / day not charged to carers 1 €160 €160 €-160 €-160
Parental evaluation committee 5 times / year, 1 h, 10 persons €14/ h 4 €2 €2
Value of the extended school hours

0.5 h freed-up, 4 times / week

2 children / household

€14 / hour 4 €-562
  Beneficiaries of unemployment benefits Preparing lunches as part of reintegration to the labour market 1 person, 15 h/week NA E
  External parties from the leisure sector Giving workshops €6675 1 €20 €20 €0 B €0 B
  Cross-discipline coordinators from the local government Organizing activities 1 FTE / 4 schools €50,000 / FTE 1 €37 €37 €0 C €0 C
  Pedagogical staff from childcare partners Guiding lunch break and activities

HPSF: 12 persons, 2 h/day,

4 days/week (upper grades 5 days/week), 40 weeks

PAS: 8 persons, 1.5 h/day,

3 days/week (upper grades 4 days/week), 40 weeks

€65,000/ FTE 1 €524 €204 €0 D €0 D
Materials
  Transport €7097 3 €21 €21
  Accommodations 1 h, 4 days/week €17.5/h 3 €8 €8
  Food (including personnel from caterer) HPSF: 4 times / week, 40 weeks

Cost: €2.46 / child / day 3

Offset: €-1.86 / day 5

€394 F €-298 F
  Curriculum materials 1 set per year €2500 / school 1 €7 €7
  Monitoring equipment 1 survey €1200 / survey 1 €4 €4
Total costs
Net costs (per child/year) €1394 €647 €-965 €142 €0 €0 €0 €0 €429 €505
  Personnel €959 €606 €-667 €-142 €0 €0 €0 €0 €292 €464
  Materials €434 €41 €-298 €0 €0 €0 €0 €0 €137 €41
Net costs (per child/day) €8.71 €4.04 €-6.03 €-0.89 €0.00 €0.00 €0.00 €0.00 €2.68 €3.16

HPSF = Healthy Primary School of the Future; PAS = Physical Activity School; FTE = full-time equivalent.

Discrepancies between the sum of cost items may be due to rounding.

1Budget ‘the Healthy Primary School of the Future’

2Productivity costs of paid labour (Zorginstituut Nederland 2015)

3Accounting data ‘the Healthy Primary School of the Future’

4Productivity costs of unpaid labour (Zorginstituut Nederland 2015)

5Household expenses on children’s lunches (NIBUD 2017)

6 Minimum wage (“Minimumloon 2016”)

7Unemployment benefits (Rijksoverheid 2016)

8Income tax (Belastingdienst 2016)

AValue of time investment minus financial compensation

B-DFinancial contributions fully compensated the time investments

EAssumed that offsets due to the reintegration of beneficiaries only applied to the steady state

FFood costs are a positive cost to the education sector and a negative cost to the household sector

Table 3.

Per child costs of HPSF and PAS for a hypothetical steady state

Cost items for the steady state Activities Volume (per school) Unit price Stakeholder perspective
Education Household & leisure Labour & social security Healthcare Societal perspective
HPSF PAS HPSF PAS HPSF PAS HPSF PAS HPSF PAS
Personnel
  Program coordinator Coordination 4 schools: 0.25 FTE A €112,000 / FTE 1 €21 €21
  School project leaders Coordination 0.25 FTE A €65,000 / FTE 1 €49 €49
  Volunteers Assisting during lunch break and activities

Financial compensation:

HPSF: €12,645 1; PAS: €8145 1

€38 €24 €53 B €17 B

Time investment

HPSF: 12 volunteers, 1 h/day,

4 days/week (upper grades 5 days/week), 40 weeks

PAS: 7 volunteers, 1 h/day,

3 days/week (upper grades 4 days/week), 40 weeks

Time investment

€14 / hour 4

  Primary caregivers Parental evaluation committee 5 times / year, 1 h, 10 persons €14/ h 4 €2 €2
Value of the extended school hours

0.5 h freed-up, 4 times / week

2 children / household

€14 / hour 4 €-562
  Beneficiaries of unemployment benefits Preparing lunches as part of reintegration to the labour market 1 person, 15 h/week

Income level: €1525 / month 6,

Unemployment benefits: €1320 / month7; €8.80 / hour 6

Income taxes: 36.55% 8

€-3 C €0 €-22 C €0
  External parties from the leisure sector Giving workshops €6675 1 €20 €20 €0 D €0 D
  Pedagogical staff from childcare partners Guiding lunch break and activities

HPSF: 12 persons, 2 h/day,

4 days/week (upper grades 5 days/week), 40 weeks

PAS: 8 persons, 1.5 h/day,

3 days/week (upper grades 4 days/week), 40 weeks

€65,000/ FTE 1 €524 €204 €0 E €0 E
Materials
  Food (including personnel from caterer) HPSF: 4 times / week, 40 weeks

Cost: €2 / child / day A

Offset: €1.86 / day 5

€320 F €0 €-298 F €0
  Curriculum materials 1 set per year €2500 / school 1 €7 €7
  Monitoring equipment 1 survey €1200 / survey 1 €4 €4
Total costs
Net costs (per child/year) €982 €328 €-807 €18 €-22 €0 €0 €0 €153 €346
  Personnel €651 €317 €-510 €18 €-22 €0 €0 €0 €120 €335
  Materials €331 €11 €-298 €0 €0 €0 €0 €0 €33 €11
Net costs (per child/day) €6.14 €2.05 €-5.05 €0.11 €-0.13 €0.00 €0.00 €0.00 €0.96 €2.16

HPSF = Healthy Primary School of the Future; PAS = Physical Activity School; FTE = full-time equivalent.

Discrepancies between the sum of cost items may be due to rounding.

1Budget ‘the Healthy Primary School of the Future’

2Productivity costs of paid labour (Zorginstituut Nederland 2015)

3Accounting data ‘the Healthy Primary School of the Future’

4Productivity costs of unpaid labour (Zorginstituut Nederland 2015)

5Household expenses on children’s lunches (NIBUD 2017)

6 Minimum wage (“Minimumloon 2016”)

7Unemployment benefits (Rijksoverheid 2016)

8Income tax (Belastingdienst 2016)

ASteady state assumption

BValue of time investment minus financial compensation

CHousehold: income level minus unemployment benefits; social security: savings from unemployment benefits and earnings from income taxes

D-EFinancial contributions fully compensated the time investments

FFood costs are a positive cost to the education sector and a negative cost to the household sector

Footnotes

The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1007/s11121-018-0918-1

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Prevention Science are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES