Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2018 Jun 18;20(8):1093–1095. doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1909-1

Correction to: Biomarkers in breast cancer: A consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology

R Colomer 1,, I Aranda-López 2, J Albanell 3, T García-Caballero 4, E Ciruelos 5, M Á López-García 6, J Cortés 7,8,9, F Rojo 10, M Martín 11, J Palacios-Calvo 12,
PMCID: PMC6828516  PMID: 29916189

Correction to: Clin Transl Oncol 10.1007/s12094-017-1800-5

On page 5 of the article, in the last paragraph of the section “Prognostic genetic platforms: molecular phenotypes and translation to the clinic” a relevant discrepancy between the text and Table 1 could be misunderstood, therefore the paragraph was corrected. The corrected version as well as some changes in Tables 1 and 2 that reflect the updated modifications are shown here:

Table 1.

Usage recommendations for different genetic tests as prognostic tools or to establish the benefit of adding chemotherapy to hormone therapy in the management of breast cancer

Oncotype DX® MammaPrint® Prosigna® (PAM50) EndoPredict®
ASCO 2017 [1]

Guides the decision to prescribe adjuvant systemic chemotherapy

Evidence: high

Recommendation: strong

May be used in ER/PR positive, HER2 negative, high risk breast cancer

 Node-negative

 Evidence: high

 Recommendation: strong

 Node-positive (1–3 nodes)a

 Evidence: high

 Recommendation: moderate

It should not be used in either ER/PR positive low risk per MINDACT, HER2 positive or triple negative breast cancer

Guides the decision to prescribe adjuvant systemic chemotherapy together with other clinical and pathological variables

Evidence: high

Recommendation: strong

Guides the decision to prescribe adjuvant systemic chemotherapy

Evidence: intermediate

Recommendation: moderate

NCCN 2017 [2]

The only test recommended for patients with > 0.5 cm tumour

Oncotype DX®: can be considered for selecting patients with 1–3 ipsilateral lymph nodes involved

The only test validated for predicting chemotherapy response

Prognostic value, but not validated for predicting chemotherapy response
St Gallen 2017 [3] Prognostic value and predictive of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative tumors. No role in clinical low risk patients, where chemotherapy would not be indicated
SEOM

5-year recurrence risk prognosis: IA/IB

10-year recurrence risk prognosis: IB

Chemotherapy benefit prediction: IA/IB

5-year recurrence risk prognosis: IB

10-year recurrence risk prognosis: –

Chemotherapy benefit prediction: –

5-year recurrence risk prognosis: IB

10-year recurrence risk prognosis: IB

Chemotherapy benefit prediction: –

5-year recurrence risk prognosis: IB

10-year recurrence risk prognosis: IB

Chemotherapy benefit prediction: –

IMPAKT Little but significant prognostic information above and beyond clinical and pathological parameters. No evidence of clinical usefulness for modifying the treatment decision.

ASCO American Society of Clinical Oncology, IMPAKT improving care and knowledge through translational research in breast cancer, NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network, SEOM Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

aPatients should be informed that a benefit of chemotherapy cannot be excluded, particularly in cases > 1 involved axillary nodes

Table 2.

Prognostic and predictive value of different genetic tests in breast cancer

ASCO 2017 [1] NCCN 2017 [2] St Gallen 2017 [3] SEOM 2015
Prognosis CT benefit prediction Prognosis CT benefit prediction Prognosis CT benefit prediction Prognosis CT benefit prediction
5 years 10 years 5 years 10 years 5 years 10 years
Oncotype DX® Yes NA Yes Yes Yes +++ +++ Yes

IA (low RS)

IB (other RSs)

IB

IA (low RS)

IB (other RSs)

Prosigna® Yes Yes Yes Yes NA ++ ++ Yes IB IB NA
MammaPrint® Yes No Yes Yes NA +++ NA Yes IB NA NA
EndoPredict® Yes Yes Yes Yes NA ++ ++ Yes IB IB NA

ASCO American Society of Clinical Oncology, CT chemotherapy, ESMO European Society for Medical Oncology, NA not available, NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network, RS Recurrence Score, SEOM Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

The 2017 update of the ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline of Biomarkers use for the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer, focused on the use of MammaPrint®, specified that MammaPrint® may be used in patients with HR+, HER2-negative cases with high clinical risk per MINDACT, either without lymph node involvement or with 1–3 positive nodes, to inform decisions on withholding adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the ASCO guideline warns that these patients should be informed that a benefit of chemotherapy cannot be excluded, particularly in patients with > 1 nodes involved. On the other hand, MammaPrint® does not have a use in either the ER/PR positive low-risk category, in patients with HER2 + or triple-negative breast cancer, according to the guideline [54].

Contributor Information

R. Colomer, Phone: +34 91 520 22 00, Email: rcolomer@seom.org

J. Palacios-Calvo, Phone: +34 91 336 80 00, Email: jose.palacios@salud.madrid.org

References

  • 1.Krop I, Ismaila N, Andre F, Bast RC, Barlow W, Collyar DE, et al. Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(24):2838–2847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Breast Cancer Version 4-2017. 2018. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/breast.pdf. Accessed Dec 2017. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, E PW, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Loibl S, et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(8):1700–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Clinical & Translational Oncology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES