Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-019-42066-4, published online 03 April 2019
This Article contains errors.
In the Results section under the subheading ‘ERPs of Triplet Endings’,
“Pairwise comparisons examined how the effect of transition probability evolved across the experiment (see Fig. 2C).”
should read:
“Pairwise comparisons examined how the effect of transition probability evolved across the experiment.”
In the Results section under the subheading ‘Physical Deviants’,
“Triplet endings with location changes elicited consistently larger negativities throughout the course of the experiment even though the amplitude size diminished over blocks (see Fig. 3C).”
should read:
“Triplet endings with location changes elicited consistently larger negativities throughout the course of the experiment even though the amplitude size diminished over blocks.”
Additionally, the key in Figure 2 is incorrect.
“Low Prob. with Physical Deviance”
should read:
“Low Probability”
and
“High Prob. without Physical Deviance”
should read:
“High Probability”
The correct Figure 2 appears below as Figure 1.
Figure 1.
.