Abstract
Cathepsin E (CTSE) is an intracellular, hydrolytic aspartic protease found to be expressed in cells of the immune and gastrointestinal systems, lymphoid tissues, erythrocytes, and cancer cells. The precise functions are not fully understood; however, various studies have investigated its numerous cell-type specific roles. CTSE expression has been shown to be a potential early biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PDAC patients have low survival rates; mostly due to the lack of early detection methods. CTSE-specific activity probes have been developed and tested to assist in tumor imaging and functional studies investigating the role of CTSE expression in PDAC tumors. Furthermore, a CTSE protease-specific, photodynamic therapy pro-drug was developed to explore its potential use to treat tumors that express CTSE. Since CTSE is expressed in pancreatic diseases that are risk factors for PDAC, such as pancreatic cysts and chronic pancreatitis, learning about its function in these disease types could assist in early PDAC detection and in understanding the biology of PDAC progression. Overall, CTSE expression and activity shows potential to detect PDAC and other pancreatic diseases. Further research is needed to fully understand its functions and potential translational applicability.
Keywords: PDAC, Cathepsin E, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cyst lesions, early detection biomarker
Introduction
Cathepsin E (CTSE) is an aspartic protease and a member of the peptidase A1 family of proteases, along with pepsin A and cathepsin D (CTSD)1. Although CTSE was initially found to be expressed in the spleen, it has recently been discovered to be expressed intracellularly in a variety of cell types, including gastrointestinal cells, antigen-presenting cells of the immune system, and several cell types within lymphoid tissues2–4. In some immune cell types (dendritic, microglia, and macrophages), CTSE is found to be expressed in the endosomal compartments, while in erythrocytes and gastric cells, CTSE is expressed in the plasma membrane4–7. As a protease, the main function of CTSE is to break down proteins through the hydrolysis of peptide bonds at a specific peptide sequence site8. The discovery of the functional specificity of CTSE protease activity, along with increased expression in various diseases, has led to increased interest towards studying CTSE. Studies have focused on using CTSE to improve disease diagnostics, develop imaging agents, and enhancement of treatment modalities in several types of cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)9–14.
PDAC is currently the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with a 5-year survival rate of 9 %15. Part of this poor prognosis is due to the current inability to detect early-stage disease, when it is potentially resectable16. These challenges have led to increased efforts toward the discovery and validation of biomarkers for detecting PDAC at an early stage17, 18. Among them, CTSE has been identified as a promising biomarker for several diseases. It is highly expressed in PDAC tissues13, 19 as well as gastric20, 21, cervical22, esophageal23, lung adenocarcinomas24, squamous cell carcinoma24, bladder25, 26, and ovarian carcinoma27. Moreover, besides expression levels of CTSE, the proteolytic activity of CTSE could be used for the early detection and diagnosis of multiple malignancies and has shown promising results in the development of cancer-directed chemotherapeutics1, 10, 12, 13, 28. Future discoveries of CTSE’s function in cancer and the pathways it modulates will enable the development of novel therapeutics and imaging modalities for treating and detecting PDAC. Therefore, here a comprehensive literature review was performed in order to organize and assess the state of CTSE research and how it relates to PDAC. This review discusses current knowledge of the biology and function of CTSE, as well as findings that link CTSE expression and activity to aspects of PDAC and other pancreatic diseases that increase the risk of PDAC development.
Physiological Functions of Cathepsin E
There are many gaps in knowledge as to the exact physiological functions of CTSE, though there are many hypotheses about the role CTSE expression plays in assorted cell types. In 1989, Sakai et al. examined the distribution of CTSE expression throughout various organs and tissues in rats and postulated possible functions based on its cellular localization29. Initially, it was thought that since CTSE was expressed abundantly in foveolar epithelial cells of the stomach and in lymph nodes, that it was then involved in the turnover of rapidly regenerating cells and in the processing of protein antigens for the immune response29. Further research showed that CTSE expression in erythrocytes was associated with localization to the plasma membrane and became activated by cellular aging that induced enzyme solubilization30. When activated, CTSE began to break down plasma membrane proteins as part of senescence-induced mechanisms or damaged to red blood cells29, 30.
To further understand some of the physiological functions of CTSE expression in the body, Tsukuba et al. studied CTSE-deficient mice which developed atopic dermatitis (AD)31. Lack of CTSE expression in these mice reduced the turnover rates of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin-18 and interleukin-1β31. Since similar results were not seen in mice reared under pathogen-free conditions, the AD observed was likely due to an increased susceptibility to bacterial infection and the activation of various immune-related pro-inflammatory pathways31. In addition, erythrocytes derived from patients or mice with AD showed reduced CTSE expression, suggesting that a defect in the production of CTSE may lead to the development of AD31. Moreover, a different group associated CTSE deficiency with adipose tissue modulation since CTSE-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet had an impairment in adipose tissue development that was linked to a reduction in macrophage infiltration32. CTSE was later found to have another function in modulating immune cells, as it was the major aspartic protease involved in antigen processing via the major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) pathway in a B cell lymphoblast cell line33. Further functional studies that utilized a selective and highly specific CTSE inhibitor isolated from the nematode Ascaris lumbricoides demonstrated that CTSE was essential in the processing of ovalbumin (OVA) by B cell lymphoblasts for later presentation to OVA-specific T cells33. In 2002, CTSE was found to have a similar role in the MHC-II antigen-presenting pathway in microglia through a similar mechanism5. Most of the functions of CTSE at that time described functions related to normal physiology, however increased expression of CTSE in various cancers was starting to emerged.
Since upregulation of CTSE expression has been associated with multiple cancers, researchers in cancer biology have focused on uncovering novel CTSE functions and their potential for therapeutic targeting. In prostate cancer, CTSE expression was associated with anti-tumor properties: CTSE decreased tumor growth and increased apoptosis by catalyzing the release of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) from the surface of tumor cells34. Moreover, combined CTSE and doxorubicin treatments assisted in overcoming chemoresistance of prostate cancer cells in vitro35. Another group showed that upregulation of CTSE, induced growth arrest of prostate cancer cells by inhibiting angiogenesis, and was associated increased levels of antiangiogenic molecules, such as interleukin-12 (IL-12), monokine induced by g-interferon (MIG), and endostatin36. While CTSE has been found to have several functions in prostate cancer that are anti-tumorigenic, other cathepsins (e.g., cathepsin L, cathepsin S, and cathepsin D (CTSD)) are thought to enhance metastasis by breaking down extracellular structures37, 38. There is also evidence that CTSE might behave differently in other cancers. For example, in pancreatic cancer, the abundance and localization of CTSE expression may have minimal function, either due to a lack of activation or from increased expression of CTSE-related inhibitory factors39. Since few studies have focused on understanding the function of CTSE in cancer and have primarily focused on prostate cancer, there is a knowledge gap regarding the function and mechanisms by which multiple cancer cell types upregulate the expression of CTSE. The development of CTSE-specific inhibitors will help elucidate the function of CTSE in different cancers and determine whether CTSE could be a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment.
Selective Inhibition of Cathepsin E Activity
Finding an inhibitor that specifically and selectively targets CTSE rather than other aspartic proteases is essential when investigating the function of CTSE in the cell and for therapeutic development. Currently, pepstatin is most commonly used when trying to specifically inhibit CTSE. It is an aspartic protease inhibitor that inhibits pepsin in actinomycetes40. However, as an unspecific aspartic protease inhibitor, pepstatin inhibits other targets, including CTSD, pepsin, and several other proteases, so it doesn’t allow for the specific assessment of CTSE functions5, 41.
Several small molecule inhibitors have been developed that specifically inhibit CTSD and CTSE but cannot differentiate between them41. In 1972, a compound was isolated from the parasitic worm Ascaris lumbricoides and was found to specifically inhibit CTSE42. This compound, however, could not be produced in sufficient quantities for use in functional studies. Recently, several other CTSE inhibitors have been found in cyanobacteria43, 44. One of these compounds, grassystatin A, found by Kwan et al., has 38-fold selectivity for CTSE compared to CTSD44. A method of synthesis has recently been developed to produce grassystatin A, which may be useful to study CTSE function45. While examining the function of CTSE in regulating protein turnover of the α2-macroglobulin (a protease inhibitor and transporter), researchers found that the amino acid alanine position of a peptide substrate was essential for CTSE-selective cleavage46. This finding has assisted in the development of CTSE-specific peptide sequence probes for detecting and quantifying CTSE activity14, 46, 47, and for treatment targets48, 49.
Cathepsin E as a Biomarker in Pancreatic Cancer
One factor leading to the devastating prognosis of PDAC is the lack of effective methods for early detection. PDAC is often not diagnosed until the disease has spread locally or distally, and surgical resection is a possibility only in <20% of all patients16. Serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9) are used for diagnosis of PDAC, but has poor diagnostic accuracy, especially for early stages of disease when it is particularly unreliable. Discovery of a biomarker that will improve the accuracy of PDAC detection may result in earlier detection and greater chances for long term survival.
CTSE was first found to be expressed in PDAC through immunohistochemical staining (IHC) by Sessa et al. in 1990, detecting CTSE expression in 92% of resected tumors9. Further IHC in a small group of subjects showed CTSE to be upregulated in PDAC tissue compared to chronic pancreatitis tissue19. Early pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) lesions showed CTSE staining, suggesting the possible use of CTSE as an early biomarker for this disease13, 19. CTSE has also been measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and western blots, using pancreatic fluid obtained via endoscopy; CTSE performed better than CA19–9, CEA, and the expression of Kras mutations in differentiating PDAC from chronic pancreatitis10, 19. While PDAC detection using CTSE expression in pancreatic fluid shows promise in diagnostic testing, an invasive procedure is required to collect the fluid. Moreover, with some of the tools currently available, CTSE expression has not been detected or analyzed in blood or other biofluids of patients with any pancreatic disease19, 23. One less invasive method to detect CTSE in pancreatic tissues involves using a fluorescent probe selective for the detection of CTSE activity via optical imaging. Using this CTSE-specific fluorescent peptide probe, CTSE activity was detected in PanIN lesions using various preclinical murine models (a human xenograft model and several genetically engineered mouse models of PDAC)13.
Cathepsin E Activity Imaging Peptide Probes
Several different approaches have been used to develop probes that can accurately detect CTSE activity and expression levels both in vitro and in vivo13, 14, 47, 50. In 1999, Weissleder et al. theorized that certain tumors could be detected due to their high protease expression, and experimented with a fluorescent probe activated by protease activity in a xenograft mouse model of breast cancer that was successful in detecting and imaging tumors51. The probe itself was activated through enzymatic cleavage of a protease in lysosomes51. Multiple molecules of Cy5.5, a near-infrared fluorophore, were attached to a copolymer, which assisted in localizing the probe to the tumor. Initially, the probe’s fluorescence was quenched due to the fluorophores being within close proximity of each other. Once the fluorophores were cleaved and separated from each other, a 12-fold increase in fluorescent signal was observed, which could be used to image tumors in vivo51.
Weissleder’s imaging strategy utilized a probe activated by tumor-associated proteases, but it was not fully specific for the tumor. In order to gain specificity, researchers needed to develop a probe that was activated by tumor-specific proteases which were more distinctly overexpressed, such as CTSE. Many of the early CTSE probes struggled to differentiate between CTSE and CTSD due to them sharing many structural similarities, including the catalytic mechanism and substrate preference50. However, a few CTSE-selective peptide substrates were discovered based on their selective cleavage of molecules such as α2-macroglobulin52. Yasuda et al. confirmed CTSE’s selectivity for the new substrates using an in vitro fluorescent probe model, specifically proving CTSE’s ability to preferentially cleave the substrate rather than CTSD52.
Utilizing CTSE-specific substrates, multiple CTSE-specific probes have been synthesized in order to achieve in vitro and in vivo detection. In 2010, several potential CTSE probes were synthesized and tested in vitro among a variety of cathepsins (most notably, cathepsins D and E)47. The peptide sequence Mca-Ala-Gly-Phe-Ser-Leu-Pro-Ala-Lys(Dnp)-DArg-CONH2 probe was found to displayed high selectivity for CTSE47. The fluorescent probe comprised of the fluorescent donor 7-methoxycoumarin-4-acetic acid and energy acceptor dinitrophenyl (Dnp) was created specifically for in vitro use, as it is too small to be used in vivo47. However, using Weissleder’s approach, a CTSE-selective imaging probe was synthesized and tested in vivo using both human xenografts and various genetically-engineered mouse models13, 14. Utilizing a probe in which multiple CTSE-specific peptide substrates were attached to a polylysine backbone and labeled with Cy5.5 as the fluorescent donor, detection of PDAC tumors in mice was achieved. The addition of the peptide substrates to a backbone created a larger probe molecule, ultimately aiding in tissue diffusion and cell membrane translocation. With further validation, these CTSE activity probes could be translated into clinical use for imaging or a clinical sample bioassay for cancer detection.
Future research should examine the feasibility of combining CTSE probes with other forms of in vivo imaging to improve their clinical utility. For example, Li et al. combined CTSE activity probe technology with confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) in order to visualize tumors in vivo11. They used CLE11 and a CTSE activity probe13 to study the progression of PDAC tumorigenesis within mouse models, providing the foundation for diagnosing PDAC tumors that is less invasive than biopsy or obtaining pancreatic fluid samples.
Cathepsin E Activity as a Therapeutic Activator
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a widely accepted, minimally invasive treatment for both cancerous and precancerous lesions. Using a photosensitizer, light, and oxygen, PDT generates reactive oxygen species leading to cytotoxic damage to cells. With the specificity of the photosensitizer, PDT is able to localize to tumor cells without damaging nearby healthy tissue12, 53. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), a photosensitizer that is widely used in the clinic due to its ability to image tumors, has proven to be successful in combination with PDT54. Based on the finding that CTSE was overexpressed in PDAC, the 5-ALA residue was incorporated into a peptide that is selectively cleaved by CTSE, creating a potent prodrug that can release 5-ALA in a controlled manner in cells that express CTSE like tumor cells12. The 5-ALA prodrug selectively causes PDAC cell death in vitro and in vivo when combined with PDT12. In another study, use of the gold nanocluster AuS-U11, improved CLE-guided PDT and photothermal therapy (PTT) by directing uptake of 5-ALA and the fluorescent dye Cy5.5 to cancer cells via CTSE-expression specificity to improve imaging and treatment of cancer cells55. This technology allowed for tumor specific near-infrared imaging and treatment55. These studies illustrate how technologies could be combined and applied to increase our ability to selectively image and treat cancer cells. Selectivity and specificity can be achieved by taking advantage of our current knowledge regarding the expression of molecules, such as CTSE, in tumor cells that could assist in the development of novel technologies to image and deliver therapeutics.
Cathepsin E Expression in Other Pancreatic Diseases
The incidence of pancreatic cysts in the US is estimated at 2–3% in adults, and the detection of cases continues to increase due to a greater usage of high-resolution abdominal imaging56–58. Broadly pancreatic cysts can be either premalignant mucinous (intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms [IPMN], mucinous cystic neoplasm [MCN]) or non-mucinous cysts. Currently, there is a need for biomarkers that can accurately differentiate between mucinous and non-mucinous cysts and also predict which mucinous (IPMN, MCN) cysts will progress to cancer. CTSE activity has been proposed as a better biomarker to distinguish mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cysts when compared to cyst fluid carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), the commonly used clinical biomarker59. In 2002, cDNA -based gene expression profiling of 4992 genes in IPMNs showed 8.4-fold increased expression of CTSE in the IPMNs compared to normal tissue60. Moreover, global RNA gene expression profiling found that CTSE was expressed 6.6-fold higher in the neoplastic epithelium of MCNs compared to the normal pancreatic ductal epithelium61. In addition to standard of care imaging studies (CT and/or MRI), endoscopic ultrasound needle-guided CLE with molecular analysis of pancreatic cystic fluid has revealed high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating mucinous from non-mucinous pancreatic cysts62. The potential addition of CTSE activity and expression to above strategy is a promising methodology to assist in the accurate and early diagnosis of pancreatic cysts that are more susceptible to become malignant and allow for early intervention63. This strategy was tested using a preclinical model of PDAC with promising results11 and sets the premise for clinical studies.
Chronic pancreatitis is difficult to differentiate from PDAC using traditional imaging, however CTSE is differentially expressed in both, compared to the normal pancreatic ductal epithelium. In a 1996 study, expression of CTSE in the pancreatic fluid was found in 8 of 11 (72.7%) subjects with PDAC and 4 of 43 (9.3%) subjects with chronic pancreatitis19. CTSE was later detected in the pancreatic fluid of 16 of 25 (64%) subjects with PDAC but only 6 of 76 (7.9%) subjects with chronic pancreatitis10. In both studies, the difference between CTSE detected in pancreatic fluid from subjects with PDAC versus subjects with chronic pancreatitis was significant, suggesting that the expression of CTSE could serve as a biomarker to differentiate between the two diseases10, 19. Differential expression of CTSE was also observed at the RNA level when pancreas tissue from subjects with CP was compared to those with PDAC13.
Conclusion
Currently the biological roles of CTSE expression and activity in PDAC, pancreatic cysts, chronic pancreatitis and other types of cancers remain unclear. The current functions attributed to CTSE in non-pancreatic diseases includes protein turnover, immune response regulation, and apoptosis (Figure 1). The development of CTSE-specific inhibitors, imaging, and therapeutic probes that leverage its protease function, could assist in characterizing CTSE functions in various diseases. The development and use of CTSE-specific imaging could assist future clinical imaging of tumors without the need for invasive procedures (Figure 2). Similarly, therapeutic probes have the potential to add novel therapeutic options (Figure 2). The preliminary evidence that CTSE expression and activity can be used as a disease biomarker needs to be validated in a larger data set using well phenotyped subjects with PDAC, and disease and healthy controls. Validation of the initial observations represents an opportunity to improve patient outcomes in PDAC and other pancreatic diseases (Figure 3).
Figure 1. Cathepsin E Functions:
The current functions attributed to CTSE in non-pancreatic diseases included protein turnover, immune response regulation, and apoptosis.
Figure 2. Potential Clinical Applications of CTSE.
Further development of the clinical uses of CTSE could assist in the earlier detection and treatment of PDAC and other pancreatic diseases to improve patient outcomes.
Figure 3. CTSE Expression is increased in PDAC, CP, and Pancreatic cysts.
Increased expression and activity of CTSE could serve as a biomarker of various pancreatic diseases.
Grant Support:
Research in this publication was supported by: the ORIEN Foundation (ZC-M), The National Pancreas Foundation (ZC-M), R01CA223204 (ZC-M), and by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) under award number U01DK108327 (DC, ZC-M, PH). This work was also supported in part by the Pelotonia Fellowship Program (SK) and the OSUCCC-Kenyon Student Summer Program (MH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Pelotonia Fellowship Program.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest/disclosures: ZC-M is one of the inventors in Cathepsin E-related patents US9265844 B2 “Protease Degradable Polypeptides and Uses Thereof” and US9439976 B2 “Compositions and Methods for Using Cathepsin E Cleavable Substrates”
References
- 1.Zaidi N, Kalbacher H: Cathepsin e; In: Handbook of proteolytic enzymes 2013; pp. 42–49. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lapresle C, Webb T: The purification and properties of a proteolytic enzyme, rabbit cathepsin e, and further studies on rabbit cathepsin d. Biochem J 1962; 84: 455–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Muto N, Yamamoto M, Tani S, Yonezawa S: Characteristic distribution of cathepsin e which immunologically cross-reacts with the 86-kda acid proteinase from rat gastric mucosa. J Biochem 1988; 103: 629–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chain BM, Free P, Medd P, Swetman C, Tabor AB, Terrazzini N: The expression and function of cathepsin e in dendritic cells. The Journal of Immunology 2005; 174: 1791–1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nishioku T, Hashimoto K, Yamashita K, Liou SY, Kagamiishi Y, Maegawa H et al. : Involvement of cathepsin e in exogenous antigen processing in primary cultured murine microglia. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 4816–4822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamamoto K, Marchesi VT: Purification and characterization of acid proteinase from human erythrocyte membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 790: 208–218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kageyama T, Takahashi K: A cathepsin d-like acid proteinase from human gastric mucosa. Purification and characterization. J Biochem 1980; 87: 725–735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arnold D, Keilholz W, Schild H, Dumrese T, Stevanovic S, Rammensee HG: Substrate specificity of cathepsins d and e determined by n-terminal and c-terminal sequencing of peptide pools. Eur J Biochem 1997; 249: 171–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sessa F, Bonato M, Frigerio B, Capella C, Solcia E, Prat M et al. : Ductal cancers of the pancreas frequently express markers of gastrointestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 1990; 98: 1655–1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Uno K, Azuma T, Nakajima M, Yasuda K, Hayakumo T, Mukai H et al. : Clinical significance of cathepsin e in pancreatic juice in the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 15: 1333–1338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bogyo M, Li H, Li Y, Cui L, Wang B, Cui W et al. : Monitoring pancreatic carcinogenesis by the molecular imaging of cathepsin e in vivo using confocal laser endomicroscopy. PLoS ONE 2014; 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Abd-Elgaliel WR, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Wang H, Logsdon CD, Tung CH: Pancreatic cancer-associated cathepsin e as a drug activator. J Control Release 2013; 167: 221–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cruz-Monserrate Z, Abd-Elgaliel WR, Grote T, Deng D, Ji B, Arumugam T et al. : Detection of pancreatic cancer tumours and precursor lesions by cathepsin e activity in mouse models. Gut 2012; 61: 1315–1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Abd-Elgaliel WR, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Logsdon CD, Tung CH: Molecular imaging of cathepsin e-positive tumors in mice using a novel protease-activatable fluorescent probe. Mol Biosyst 2011; 7: 3207–3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69: 7–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2014; 371: 1039–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harsha HC, Kandasamy K, Ranganathan P, Rani S, Ramabadran S, Gollapudi S et al. : A compendium of potential biomarkers of pancreatic cancer. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Koller M, Hartmans E, de Groot DJA, Zhao XJ, van Dam GM, Nagengast WB et al. : Data-driven prioritization and review of targets for molecular-based theranostic approaches in pancreatic cancer. J Nucl Med 2017; 58: 1899–1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Azuma T, Hirai M, Ito S, Yamamoto K, Taggart RT, Matsuba T et al. : Expression of cathepsin e in pancreas: A possible tumor marker for pancreas, a preliminary report. Int J Cancer 1996; 67: 492–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Matsuo K, Kobayashi I, Tsukuba T, Kiyoshima T, Ishibashi Y, Miyoshi A et al. : Immunohistochemical localization of cathepsins d and e in human gastric cancer: A possible correlation with local invasive and metastatic activities of carcinoma cells. Hum Pathol 1996; 27: 184–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lin CK, Lai KH, Lo GH, Cheng JS, Hsu PI, Mok KT et al. : Cathepsin e and subtypes of intestinal metaplasia in carcinogenesis of the human stomach. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 2001; 64: 331–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tenti P, Romagnoli S, Silini E, Zappatore R, Giunta P, Stella G et al. : Cervical adenocarcinomas express markers common to gastric, intestinal, and pancreatobiliary epithelial cells. Pathology - Research and Practice 1994; 190: 342–349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fisher OM, Levert-Mignon AJ, Lord SJ, Botelho NK, Freeman AK, Thomas ML et al. : High expression of cathepsin e in tissues but not blood of patients with barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2014; 22: 2431–2438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ullmann R, Morbini P, Halbwedl I, Bongiovanni M, Gogg-Kammerer M, Papotti M et al. : Protein expression profiles in adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of the lung generated using tissue microarrays. The Journal of Pathology 2004; 203: 798–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Blaveri E, Simko JP, Korkola JE, Brewer JL, Baehner F, Mehta K et al. : Bladder cancer outcome and subtype classification by gene expression. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 4044–4055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wild PJ, Herr A, Wissmann C, Stoehr R, Rosenthal A, Zaak D et al. : Gene expression profiling of progressive papillary noninvasive carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 4415–4429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tenti P, Aguzzi A, Riva C, Usellini L, Zappatore R, Bara J et al. : Ovarian mucinous tumors frequently express markers of gastric, intestinal, and pancreatobiliary epithelial cells. Cancer 1992; 69: 2131–2142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Busquets L, Guillen H, DeFord ME, Suckow MA, Navari RM, Castellino FJ et al. : Cathepsin e is a specific marker of dysplasia in apc mouse intestine. Tumour Biol 2006; 27: 36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sakai H, Saku T, Kato Y, Yamamoto K: Quantitation and immunohistochemical localization of cathepsins e and d in rat tissues and blood cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1989; 991: 367–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yamamoto K, Yamada M, Kato Y: Age-related and phenylhydrazine-induced activation of the membrane-associated cathepsin e in human erythrocytes. J Biochem 1989; 105: 114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsukuba T: Association of cathepsin e deficiency with development of atopic dermatitis. Journal of Biochemistry 2003; 134: 893–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kadowaki T, Kido MA, Hatakeyama J, Okamoto K, Tsukuba T, Yamamoto K: Defective adipose tissue development associated with hepatomegaly in cathepsin e-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2014; 446: 212–217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bennett K, Levine T, Ellis JS, Peanasky RJ, Samloff IM, Kay J et al. : Antigen processing for presentation by class ii major histocompatibility complex requires cleavage by cathepsin e. Eur J Immunol 1992; 22: 1519–1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kawakubo T, Okamoto K, Iwata J, Shin M, Okamoto Y, Yasukochi A et al. : Cathepsin e prevents tumor growth and metastasis by catalyzing the proteolytic release of soluble trail from tumor cell surface. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 10869–10878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yasukochi A, Kawakubo T, Nakamura S, Yamamoto K: Cathepsin e enhances anticancer activity of doxorubicin on human prostate cancer cells showing resistance to trail-mediated apoptosis. Biol Chem 2010; 391: 947–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shin M, Kadowaki T, Iwata J, Kawakubo T, Yamaguchi N, Takii R et al. : Association of cathepsin e with tumor growth arrest through angiogenesis inhibition and enhanced immune responses. Biol Chem 2007; 388: 1173–1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sobotič B, Vizovišek M, Vidmar R, Van Damme P, Gocheva V, Joyce JA et al. : Proteomic identification of cysteine cathepsin substrates shed from the surface of cancer cells. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2015; 14: 2213–2228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Khaket TP, Kwon TK, Kang SC: Cathepsins: Potent regulators in carcinogenesis. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2019; 198: 1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.O’Donoghue AJ, Ivry SL, Chaudhury C, Hostetter DR, Hanahan D, Craik CS: Procathepsin e is highly abundant but minimally active in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tumors. Biol Chem 2016; 397: 871–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Umezawa H, Aoyagi T, Morishima H, Matsuzaki M, Hamada M: Pepstatin, a new pepsin inhibitor produced by actinomycetes. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1970; 23: 259–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bird JE, Waldron TL, Little DK, Asaad MM, Dorso CR, DiDonato G et al. : The effects of novel cathepsin e inhibitors on the big endothelin pressor response in conscious rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 182: 224–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keilova H, Tomasek V: Effect of pepsin inhibitor from ascaris lumbricoides on cathepsin d and e. Biochim Biophys Acta 1972; 284: 461–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Al-Awadhi FH, Ratnayake R, Paul VJ, Luesch H: Tasiamide f, a potent inhibitor of cathepsins d and e from a marine cyanobacterium. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2016; 24: 3276–3282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kwan JC, Eksioglu EA, Liu C, Paul VJ, Luesch H: Grassystatins a-c from marine cyanobacteria, potent cathepsin e inhibitors that reduce antigen presentation. J Med Chem 2009; 52: 5732–5747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang S, Zhang W, Ding N, Lo J, Liu Y, Clare-Salzler MJ et al. : Total synthesis of grassystatin a, a probe for cathepsin e function. Bioorg Med Chem 2012; 20: 4774–4780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shibata M, Sakai H, Sakai E, Okamoto K, Nishishita K, Yasuda Y et al. : Disruption of structural and functional integrity of alpha 2-macroglobulin by cathepsin e. Eur J Biochem 2003; 270: 1189–1198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Abd-Elgaliel WR, Tung CH: Selective detection of cathepsin e proteolytic activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010; 1800: 1002–1008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Keliher EJ, Reiner T, Earley S, Klubnick J, Tassa C, Lee AJ et al. : Targeting cathepsin e in pancreatic cancer by a small molecule allows in vivo detection. Neoplasia 2013; 15: 684–IN683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Al-Awadhi FH, Law BK, Paul VJ, Luesch H: Grassystatins d-f, potent aspartic protease inhibitors from marine cyanobacteria as potential antimetastatic agents targeting invasive breast cancer. J Nat Prod 2017; 80: 2969–2986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yasuda Y, Kageyama T, Akamine A, Shibata M, Kominami E, Uchiyama Y et al. : Characterization of new fluorogenic substrates for the rapid and sensitive assay of cathepsin e and cathepsin d. J Biochem 1999; 125: 1137–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Weissleder R, Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bogdanov A Jr.,: In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17: 375–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yasuda Y, Kohmura K, Kadowaki T, Tsukuba T, Yamamoto K: A new selective substrate for cathepsin e based on the cleavage site sequence of alpha2-macroglobulin. Biol Chem 2005; 386: 299–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lee HH, Choi MG, Hasan T: Application of photodynamic therapy in gastrointestinal disorders: An outdated or re-emerging technique? Korean J Intern Med 2017; 32: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mahmoudi K, Garvey KL, Bouras A, Cramer G, Stepp H, Jesu Raj JG et al. : 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of high-grade gliomas. Journal of neuro-oncology 2019; 141: 595–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li H, Wang P, Deng Y, Zeng M, Tang Y, Zhu WH et al. : Combination of active targeting, enzyme-triggered release and fluorescent dye into gold nanoclusters for endomicroscopy-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Biomaterials 2017; 139: 30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Moris M, Bridges MD, Pooley RA, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Stauffer JA et al. : Association between advances in high-resolution cross-section imaging technologies and increase in prevalence of pancreatic cysts from 2005 to 2014. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 2016; 14: 585–593 e583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.de Jong K, Nio CY, Hermans JJ, Dijkgraaf MG, Gouma DJ, van Eijck CH et al. : High prevalence of pancreatic cysts detected by screening magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 2010; 8: 806–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I: Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on mr imaging. The American journal of gastroenterology 2010; 105: 2079–2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ivry SL, Sharib JM, Dominguez DA, Roy N, Hatcher SE, Yip-Schneider MT et al. : Global protease activity profiling provides differential diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 4865–4874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Terris B, Blaveri E, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Jones M, Missiaglia E, Ruszniewski P et al. : Characterization of gene expression profiles in intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas. The American Journal of Pathology 2002; 160: 1745–1754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fukushima N, Sato N, Prasad N, Leach SD, Hruban RH, Goggins M: Characterization of gene expression in mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas using oligonucleotide microarrays. Oncogene 2004; 23: 9042–9051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Krishna SG, Hart PA, Malli A, Kruger A, McCarthy ST, El-Dika S et al. : Endoscopic ultrasound-guided confocal laser endomicroscopy increases accuracy of differentiation of pancreatic cystic lesions. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li F, Malli A, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Conwell DL, Krishna SG: Confocal endomicroscopy and cyst fluid molecular analysis: Comprehensive evaluation of pancreatic cysts. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 10: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



