Abstract
Although the occurrence of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) in children is relatively rare, but it is associated with higher rates of mortality and severe morbidity. The peak incidence of TBM occurs in younger children who are less than five years of age, and most children present with late-stage disease. Confirmation of diagnosis is often difficult, and other infectious causes such as bacterial, viral and fungal causes must be ruled out. Bacteriological confirmation of diagnosis is ideal but is often difficult because of its paucibacillary nature as well as decreased sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests. Early diagnosis and management of the disease, though difficult, is essential to avoid death or neurologic disability. Hence, a high degree of suspicion and a combined battery of tests including clinical, bacteriological and neuroimaging help in diagnosis of TBM. Children diagnosed with TBM should be managed with antituberculosis therapy (ATT) and steroids. There are studies reporting low concentrations of ATT, especially of rifampicin and ethambutol in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and very young children are at higher risk of low ATT drug concentrations. Further studies are needed to identify appropriate regimens with adequate dosing of ATT for the management of paediatric TBM to improve treatment outcomes. This review describes the clinical presentation, investigations, management and outcome of TBM in children and also discusses various studies conducted among children with TBM.
Keywords: Antituberculosis therapy children, CSF, disease outcome, paediatric, steroids, tuberculous meningitis
Introduction
Globally, almost half a million children become sick with tuberculosis (TB) every year, 20-30 per cent being affected by extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). Almost 10-20 per cent of the children with TB live in high TB burden countries1. Mathematical modelling has shown that more than 58 per cent cases of paediatric TB occur in children less than five years and one-fourth of them have EPTB2. Infants, young and HIV-infected children are often affected with severe forms such as disseminated TB or tuberculous meningitis (TBM). The most common manifestation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection in the central nervous system (CNS) is meningitis. Even though TBM constitutes a small proportion of the total reported TB cases (around 1%), it causes a disproportionate amount of suffering with higher rates of mortality and morbidity, especially in young children3. TBM has a poor prognosis, and survivors often have severe disabilities4. TBM frequently presents with non-specific symptoms in the early stages and is diagnosed in the later stages of the illness when brain damage has already occurred. Early diagnosis and management of TBM is important, as delay in diagnosis leads to poor outcomes such as death, neurological sequelae and neurocognitive disorders. TBM is diagnosed based on clinical findings, demonstration of Mtb in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by smear microscopy, culture, DNA amplification testing, aided by imaging techniques5. Most of the available information regarding paediatric TBM is from retrospective studies, as only a few prospective studies have been conducted. Here we discuss the clinical presentation, investigations, management and outcome of TBM in children.
Epidemiology
Despite advancements in technology for Mtb detection, TB diagnosis, especially EPTB in children is a major challenge. There is a paucity of data about global burden of different types of EPTB in children, including TBM. However, there are isolated reports from different countries regarding local TBM burden. According to surveillance data from Germany, of the total paediatric TB patients, TBM occurred in 3.9 per cent of the children in less than five-year age group, 2.2 per cent in 5 to 9 yr of age and 1.3 per cent in 10 to 14 yr of age6. In one hospital in Greece, 43 children were diagnosed with TBM between 1984 and 2008, with a declining trend over the years7. A hospital-based study in Beijing showed that among 1212 children admitted for TB treatment between 2002 and 2010, almost half of them had EPTB and around 39 per cent had TBM8. It is unclear whether geographic differences exist for the risk of TBM among TB-exposed children related to differences in circulating strains, demographics, genetics or other factors. Most reports describing TBM in children had been hospital based, and very few were from systematic surveillance. Global as well as country-wise disease burden of TBM in children is largely unavailable and understudied.
Pathogenesis
Arnold Rich and Howard McCordock showed the presence of a caseating focus in the brain parenchyma or meninges on autopsy in patients with TBM9. CNS is involved following primary infection of the lungs through haematogenous spread to the brain. Initially, small tuberculous lesions known as 'Rich foci' form around the bacteria that are deposited in the brain during bacteraemia of primary TB. These foci located in the subpial or subependymal surface of the brain, meninges and bacilli remain in a dormant state for a prolonged duration. The onset of TBM follows the growth and rupture of these lesions into the ventricular system or subarachnoid space10. On an average, TBM occurs 6 to 12 months after the primary infection11. Mtb has the ability to invade and traverse the blood-brain barrier which is dependent on the presence of certain virulence factors, exocytosis and longer intracellular survival12. One study showed that there was significant elevation of cathelicidin LL-37, interluekin (IL)-13 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and reduction of IL-17 in the CSF of children with TBM when compared to children with viral and bacterial meningitis13. This biomarker pattern suggests a host immune response which is disease specific and may be of diagnostic and therapeutic importance. TBM is a meningo-encephalitic disease. A thick gelatinous exudate containing erythrocytes, neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes14 is formed around the brain stem, sylvian fissures and basal cisterns, causing obstruction to the flow of CSF from the cerebral aqueduct or fourth ventricle. Absorption of CSF is also interfered leading to raised intracranial pressure (ICP) and hydrocephalus. The basal exudates may lead to periarteritis of the cerebral arteries leading to infarction of the caudate nucleus and internal capsule. There may be oedema of the brain, perivascular infiltration and inflammation of the blood vessel walls leading to narrowing or occlusion by thrombi resulting in infarcts in the distribution of the medial striate and thalamic perforating arteries15.
Clinical features
The occurrence of TBM is rare in children who are lesser than three months of age16, but cases have been reported in broader age group ranging from six weeks to 18 yr. The peak incidence of TBM in children occurs between 2 and 4 yr of age17. Boys are affected more than girls. The clinical onset of TBM may be acute, subacute or gradual11 and is characterized by non-specific symptoms in the early stages, such as malaise, low-grade fever, symptoms related to pulmonary TB and/or flu-like illness17. Most children present for initial evaluation with symptoms such as headache, fever, vomiting and irritability. Children with more advanced disease may have signs of meningeal irritation, raised ICP (bulging fontanelle, sunsetting sign, papilloedema), cranial nerve palsies, neurological deficits, altered sensorium and movement disorders15. The various cranial nerve palsies documented in different studies include second, third, sixth18 and seventh cranial nerve palsies7,19,20.
Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is used to measure the consciousness level in these children as well as to determine the prognosis. Eye opening, motor responses and verbal responses contribute to GCS scoring. The British Medical Research Council (BMRC) staging is used to evaluate the disease severity as well as to establish the prognosis of TBM21. The 'modified' MRC scale categorizes patients into three clinical stages22. The 'refined' MRC scale and 'modified' MRC scale are similar except that Stage 2 is divided into Stage 2a and Stage 2b in the latter based on GCS score and absence or presence of neurological deficit22.
Diagnosis
Early diagnosis and treatment of TBM plays a vital role in determining the disease outcome. This is challenging given that, early symptoms are often non-specific, so high degree of suspicion is required. The various methods used in the diagnosis of TBM include CSF cellular and biochemical analysis, microbiologic confirmation in CSF and other supportive testing such as neuroimaging.
CSF analysis
CSF findings in TBM consist of leucocytosis with lymphocyte predominance, protein elevation and decrease in CSF glucose (hypoglycorrhachia) which is reflected as either decreased glucose in CSF or CSF to plasma glucose ratio23. When the CSF is left to stand undisturbed, a fine clot resembling cobwebs may form due to the presence of very high level of protein24. Thilothammal et al25 showed that 11 and 15 per cent of the children with Stage 2 and 3 disease, respectively, had CSF protein value >100 mg/dl. Yaramiş et al26 reported that around 80 per cent of CSF parameters from children affected with TBM had predominance of lymphocytes, elevated protein and reduced glucose concentrations. Uniform Research Case Definition Criteria27,28 used the following CSF criteria for scoring in TBM: clear appearance, cells 50-100/μl, lymphocytic predominance of >50 per cent, protein concentration >1 g/l, CSF: plasma glucose ratio of <50 per cent or absolute CSF glucose concentration <2.2 mmol/l27,28. Solomons et al29 showed that CSF glucose concentration of <2.2 mmol/l had specificity 0.96 and sensitivity 0.68 and CSF protein more than 1 g/l had specificity 0.94 and sensitivity 0.78 in diagnosing TBM in suspects. CSF to serum glucose ratio of <0.5 had a sensitivity of 0.90. Mean CSF protein and CSF glucose concentration do not differ significantly between microbiologically defined and clinically diagnosed children with TBM29. While comparing the confirmed TBM and confirmed bacterial meningitis, CSF lymphocytes >50 per cent were not informative29. In a prospective study, Solomons et al30 observed >50 per cent CSF lymphocytes in 89, 84, 60 and 68 per cent in bacteriologically confirmed TBM, TBM but not bacteriologically confirmed, bacterial and viral meningitis patients, respectively.
Bacteriology
Identification of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in CSF by smear and culture helps in confirmation of CNS TB. Growing Mtb in culture provides opportunity for drug sensitivity testing, which may influence the selection of treatment regimen. However, the sensitivity of both CSF AFB smear microscopy and culture isolation is around 20 per cent in children23. A minimum quantity of 5 ml CSF (preferably 10 to 15 ml) is necessary for mycobacterial investigations, and repeat samples with spinning large volumes for 30 min may increase the detection rate; however, collection of these high volumes in infants and young children is highly impractical24. Solid culture medium such as Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) takes 4-6 wk on an average to give a positive result31. Farinha et al19 showed that CSF AFB smear and culture was positive in 51 and 39 per cent, respectively, in children with TBM. CSF culture positivity was reported as 35 per cent among Greek children by Mihailidou et al7. Mtb was isolated from 12 to 30 per cent of the CSF samples in children with TBM in studies from South Africa32 and Turkey26 respectively. Miftode et al33 reported that CSF AFB smear was negative in all samples and positive culture was observed in 31 per cent among children in Romania. The conventional solid culture media are Middlebrook 7H10, selective Middlebrook 7H11 (S7H11) and L-J medium. The BACTEC liquid culture system which is valuable for the rapid detection of mycobacteria has been more successful than conventional solid culture methods. Venkataswamy et al34 showed that the isolation rates from CSF of TBM patients were 93 and 39 per cent for BACTEC and L-J, respectively. CSF culture has poor sensitivity and requires days to weeks to yield a final result. Despite prolonged attempts to develop antibody tests for the diagnosis of TBM, currently, no assay is precise enough to take the place of microscopy and culture. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are new tools in the diagnostic arsenal for TBM35. When definite TBM is used as reference standard, the specificity and sensitivity for the Xpert MTB/RIF test were 100 and 39 per cent, respectively, in children35. A meta-analysis of 14 studies which evaluated the accuracy of NAAT in TBM diagnosis reported a sensitivity of 0.56, specificity of 0.98, negative likelihood ratio of 44 and positive likelihood ratio of 35.1, suggesting their role in confirmation but not ideal for ruling out TBM36. Bhatia et al37 reported the sensitivity of GeneXpert and BACTEC Culture as 38.24 and 14.71 per cent, respectively, in children suspected with TBM. Nhu et al38 showed that sensitivities of smear, Xpert and Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture in TBM patients were 78.6, 59.3 and 66.5 per cent, respectively, in comparison to the clinical diagnosis, and Gene Xpert's specificity was 99.5 per cent. WHO recommends the use of Xpert MTB/RIF as the initial diagnostic test for CSF testing in children suspected with TBM39. The limitations of using Xpert for the diagnosis of TBM include false negatives which could lead to missed or delayed diagnosis as well as delayed diagnosis leading to poor outcomes40. WHO recommendations for the use of Xpert MTB/RIF had been revised in 2017 and also apply for the use of Xpert Ultra as the initial diagnostic test for CSF testing41. Combination of tests including antigen detection, molecular techniques along with smear microscopy and culture is needed for improvement in diagnosis42. Multi-targeted loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a NAAT assay, has shown good sensitivity and specificity43 which needs to be studied for further recommendations. Berwal et al44 have shown a specificity of 89.6 per cent and sensitivity of 71.4 per cent for multiplex PCR.
Neuroimaging
The triad of radiological findings in TBM includes hydrocephalus, infarctions and basal meningeal enhancement45. The five major computed tomography (CT) features which support the TBM diagnosis include infarcts, hydrocephalus, tuberculomas, basal meningeal enhancement and pre-contrast basal hyperdensities46. Hydrocephalus and meningeal enhancement are important signs of TBM in CT scan, observed in 80 and 75 per cent of children with TBM, respectively27,47,48. Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more than CT in detecting basal meningeal enhancement, granulomas and infarcts in paediatric TBM45. Basal enhancement is seen in almost all patients49. More than half of patients have infarcts, especially in the middle cerebral artery territory and basal ganglia50; lentiform nucleus infarcts are also seen45. Schoeman et al51 reported that there was no correlation between the size of the ventricle and baseline CSF pressure whereas the subarachnoid space size in the initial CT scan correlated with ICP. MRI findings in HIV-infected children when compared to HIV-negative children include high frequency of ventricular dilatation following cerebral atrophy, high frequency of communicating hydrocephalus, less frequency of basal meningeal enhancement and granuloma formation52,53.
Adenosine deaminase (ADA)
Rana et al54 observed a positive correlation between adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels and protein in CSF; however, it was not observed between ADA levels and pleocytosis in CSF in children with TBM. Gupta et al55 reported that CSF ADA level of 10 U/l or higher had a sensitivity of 94.73 per cent and a specificity 90.47 per cent for differentiating TBM from meningitis caused by other infectious agents.
Evidence of TB outside the CNS
In addition to the tests for diagnosis of CNS TB, thorough clinical examination and investigations to look for evidence of TB in the other sites including ocular examination, lymph node, gastric aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage and ultrasound abdomen need to be considered.
X-ray chest
Almost half of the children may have an abnormal chest X-ray56. Chest X-ray abnormalities observed in these children include parenchymal infiltration, intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, miliary opacities, paratracheal consolidation, airway compression, thickened pleural effusion and atelectasis26,56,57,58,59. Güneş et al59 reported that children in Stage 3 disease had fewer chest X-ray abnormalities and miliary opacities. While the percentage of children with TBM who have TB in other locations is unknown, a clinically driven thorough evaluation for TB outside the CNS is prudent and can be informative.
Tuberculin skin test (TST)
Tuberculin skin test (TST) in children with TBM contributes to diagnosis as well as prognosis. The mortality rate among children with TBM with negative TST was greater than that with positive TST58. TST positivity in children with TBM ranges from 18.9 to 81 per cent7,19,26,59. Mahadevan et al60 showed that the size of the tuberculin reaction in children was larger in early stage and smaller in advanced disease of TBM and there was an association between CSF quantitative cellular response and size of TST reaction.
Case definitions of tuberculous meningitis
Before 2010, possible, probable and definite TBM was diagnosed in many different ways20,32,48,52,61,62. In 2010, a uniform research case definition was proposed by an international expert panel based on clinical, CSF, cerebral imaging and evidence of TB elsewhere criteria to aid scientific endeavours in this area27. TBM is classified as 'definite' when AFB is demonstrated in the CSF by positive culture and/or NAAT; histological changes in the CNS presenting with suggestive symptoms/signs and CSF changes or visible changes in the autopsy. Probable TBM is when diagnostic score is ≥12 and ≥10 when neuroimaging is available and unavailable, respectively, and 'possible' when diagnostic score is 6-11 and 6-9 when neuroimaging is available and unavailable, respectively27. The uniform research case definition was applied by Solomons et al28 in a study to differentiate TBM and bacterial meningitis in children. When children with definite TBM and bacterial meningitis were compared, probable TBM score had 86 per cent sensitivity and 100 per cent specificity. The sensitivity was 100 per cent and specificity was 56 per cent for possible TBM score. The ability to detect stage 1 TBM was suboptimal, and almost one-fourth of the TBM children would be missed because of the limitations of the case definition30.
Treatment
TBM is associated with higher death rates, and even after adequate management, residual neurological sequelae are common. Mortality is higher in early childhood as young children are at higher risk of progression to severe forms of TB32. Hence, empirical antituberculosis therapy (ATT) should be started when TBM is suspected. Corticosteroids should be a part of the treatment for all patients irrespective of the disease severity. The recommended steroids are dexamethasone and prednisolone63.
Antimicrobial treatment
WHO rapid advice for TB treatment in children recommends that the children diagnosed with TBM should receive a standard four-drug treatment regimen comprising isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z) and ethambutol (E) for two months [the intensive phase (IP)] followed by 10 months of continuation phase treatment with H and R, and the drug doses are similar to pulmonary TB64. The recommended daily doses of ATT include H 10 (7-15) mg/kg, R 15 (10-20) mg/kg, Z 35 (30-40) mg/kg and E 20 (15-25) mg/kg. H has good CSF penetration and can achieve CSF levels over 30 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Mtb rapidly65. Usage of higher doses of H (10-20 mg/kg) and R (20 mg/kg) with substitution of ethionamide (Eth) for E has been successful in children in improving the treatment outcomes, but there have been no randomized trials comparing WHO standard of care to this (or other) enhanced regimen in children66. Pouplin et al67 showed that individual concentrations of H and Z in CSF were comparable to that in plasma; however, R concentrations were lower than the MIC in most children with TBM. Study in adults with TBM using high-dose R along with a fluoroquinolone showed decline in mortality and disability68 with supportive data from pharmacokinetic studies69,70. The commonly used third drug is Z which attains high concentrations in CSF71. The fourth drug is either E or streptomycin (S); both have poor CSF penetration65. Fluoroquinolones look promising for TBM treatment, but more studies are needed to prove their efficacy and safety in children72. A model-based approach determined the optimal dose of R in children with TBM as 30 mg/kg oral dose or 15 mg/kg intravenous dose daily and oral levofloxacin doses as 19-33 mg/kg to attain target exposures69. Other alternative drugs are Eth and prothionamide, used mostly in limited settings for both adults and children with TBM73.
While WHO recommends a 12-month regimen including standard first-line TB drugs at doses intended for pulmonary TB, at country levels, different regimens are used. This is largely because of the paucity of clinical trials regarding the treatment of paediatric TBM. In one meta-analysis assessing paediatric TBM outcomes in multiple international settings, almost 27 different regimens were used with varied dosage and duration4. The Technical and Operational Guidelines 2016, India, recommends two months of IP with HREZ followed by four months of HRE and may be extended for another three to six months74. The index TB guidelines for EPTB in India recommends the duration of treatment for a period of at least nine months75.
Among the adverse effects of ATT in children, the major concern is regarding drug-induced hepatitis (DIH), especially with the use of H, R and Z. A review on the incidence of DIH among 717 children treated for TBM reported abnormal liver function tests in nearly 53 per cent and occurrence of jaundice in 10.8 per cent of the children76. van Toorn et al77 studied the safety and efficacy of six and nine months of treatment with RHZEth for HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected children with drug-susceptible TBM respectively in South Africa. DIH was noted in five per cent, and overall mortality was 3.8 per cent. The authors concluded that these shorter, intensified therapies were effective and safe in children with drug-sensitive TBM irrespective of their HIV status.
All patients diagnosed with TBM should be offered HIV testing. Although the principles of treatment are similar to HIV-uninfected children, the co-existence of HIV complicates the diagnosis of TB due to atypical presentations. Simultaneous administration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and ATT can result in cumulative toxicities, drug-drug interactions and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) thereby complicating the management66. While it is recommended that initiation of ART in adult patients with TBM and HIV be delayed78, the best timing for initiation of ART in children (who are at higher risk for HIV-related sickness and death) is unknown.
There is limited information except for a few case reports regarding paradoxical reaction which is worsening of signs and symptoms of TB after initiation of ATT in children. The frequency, predictors, spectrum of paradoxical reaction and its impact on the outcome had been documented in adult patients; however, this information is limited for children with TBM.
Corticosteroids in tuberculous meningitis (TBM)
A Cochrane review on corticosteroids for managing TBM concluded that corticosteroids reduced mortality in both adults and children by 25 per cent at two months to two years after its initiation. Nine clinical trials were included in this review, of which six used dexamethasone, two used prednisolone and one compared the effects of both with a placebo. Steroids may not have an effect on disabling neurological deficits, and there is a need for further research on the optimum choice and dosing of corticosteroids79. It is likely that most patients are helped and some are harmed by steroids, but methods for discriminating these two populations, up to now, do not exist.
Role of host-directed therapies
Host-directed therapies (HDTs) are gaining attention nowadays, and a wide range of drugs are under evaluation to act as adjuncts to standard ATT. Some of the beneficial effects of HDTs studied in human and animal models are reduction of tissue inflammation and necrosis, dissociation of granuloma, enhanced drug penetration into granuloma, accelerated clearance of bacilli and thereby decreasing the chances of relapse80,81. Anti-tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors are being studied in many trials as adjunctive therapy for ATT. Thalidomide showed promising results in animal studies82, but a clinical trial in children reported deaths and adverse events such as neutropenia, hepatitis and skin rashes83. Other newer anti-TNF-α inhibitors such as pentoxifylline, adalimumab and etanercept are currently under testing for shortening the duration of anti-TB treatment80.
Phosphodiesterase inhibitors-I, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, vitamin D and efflux pump inhibitors are group of drugs with potential to improve outcomes and shorten the treatment duration, but their beneficial effects on children with TBM need to be established80,81. Varying doses of aspirin does not play a role in improving the motor and neurocognitive outcomes in children with advanced disease84.
Role of surgery
Hydrocephalus, a frequent complication of TBM, can be managed medically with diuretics, osmotic agents or interventions such as serial lumbar punctures, external ventricular drainage or ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS)14. The indications for VPS including obstructive hydrocephalus and monitoring of ICP are essential to determine the urgency of the procedure in case of communicating hydrocephalus85. Early VPS in children with significant hydrocephalus reduces morbidity and mortality and also is a favourable predictor of good outcome26.
Drug-resistant TBM
There is a paucity of information regarding TBM due to drug-resistant strains. A study from South Africa reported eight paediatric cases of multidrug-resistant TBM (MDR-TBM)86. Mortality was high (87.5%) and HIV co-infection was present among 75 per cent. Risk factors that contributed to high mortality were delay in diagnosis, disseminated disease, HIV co-infection, absence of standardized approach to MDR-TBM treatment and poor penetration of MDR-TB drugs into the CSF86. Another South African study investigated the impact of drug resistance on the clinical outcomes of 123 children with TBM87. Young age and MDR TB were risk factors for unfavourable outcome whereas there was no significant difference in the outcome between H mono-resistant and drug-susceptible TBM87. This suggests that the role of rifampicin is critical in the treatment of TBM. For drug-resistant TB, a drug with similar sterilizing activity that can arrest the progression of TBM to death is urgently needed.
Outcomes
Many of the studies reporting treatment outcomes in paediatric TBM were retrospective chart reviews (Table I). Mortality rates varied between 5 and 23 per cent. Around 14-52 per cent of the children with TBM had post-treatment neurological sequelae. A systematic review of the treatment outcomes of childhood TBM published in 2014 analyzed 19 studies and 1636 children. The risk of mortality despite treatment was 19.3 per cent, and the chances of survival without disability was 36.7 per cent. Children diagnosed in the advanced stages of disease had poor outcomes4. van Well et al32 reported that 16 per cent of the children were normal, 52 per cent had mild sequelae, 19 per cent had severe sequelae and 13 per cent died when followed up after six months. In a study from southern India, children treated for TBM were reviewed after 2 to 7 yr, 46 per cent had behavioural problems, 46 per cent had poor schooling performance, 22 per cent had neurological deficit and 15 per cent had seizure disorder95. Miftode et al33 reported that children had higher frequency of neurological deficits; however, mortality rates were similar to adults.
Table I.
Author(s) and country | Study design and study duration | Study population | Staging/grading of disease severity (%) | ATT and steroids | Treatment outcome (%) | Factors associated with outcome | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complete recovery | Death | Neurologic sequelae/disability | ||||||
Ramachandran et al89, Chennai, India | Three chemotherapy studies | 180 children with TBM aged between 1 and 12 yr | 1-13 2-77 3-9 (Modified BMRC staging) | 2SHR/4S2EH/6EH or 2SHRZ/10EH or 2R2SHZ/10EH Steroids for 6-12 wk | 34 | 27 | 39 | Presentation at Stage 1 - Better outcome Presentation at Stage 3 - Poor outcome |
Mihailidou et al7, Greece | Retrospective record review, 1984-2008 | 43 children with TBM aged between 7 months to 13 yr | 1-37.2 2-37.2 3-25.6 (BMRC staging) | 2HRSZ or E/10HR (47%) 2HRS or Z/10HR (26%) HR (27%) Steroids for 3-4 wk | 5 | 14 | Presentation at Stage 3 - Poor outcome | |
Ramzan et al18, Kashmir, India | Prospective study, 2007-2011 | 65 children diagnosed with TBM, aged 19 months to 13 yr | 1-32 2-51 3-17 (Modified criteria of MRC staging) | 3HRZE/9HR steroids for initial 4-6 wk | 6 | Low GCS, seizures and basal exudates, infarcts in CT - Poor outcomes | ||
Farinha et al19, London, UK** | Retrospective cohort study (last 9 patients prospective) 1977-1997 | 38 children with CNS TB, 23 with TBM, 10 TBM with tuberculomas, 5 with tuberculomas, aged between 8 months and 16 yr | 1-6 2-30 3-64 (BMRC staging) | ATT with concurrent steroids | 13 | 47 | Past history of BCG vaccination - Better outcome Stage 3 disease - Poor outcome | |
Karande et al20, Mumbai, India | Prospective observational study, 2000-2003 | 123 children with TBM, aged between 3 months and 12 yr | 1-4 2-10 3-86.2 (BMRC staging) | 2 HRZE/4 HR steroids for 4 wk | 20 | 23 | 57 | Hypertonia - Predictor of neurological sequelae Deep coma - Poor outcome |
Thilothammal et al25, Chennai, India | Case-control study, 1990-1992 | 107 children with TBM, aged between 6 months and 12 yr | 1-20 2-60 3-20 (Gordon and Parson)88 | 2HRZS/10HR steroids for the first 4-6 wk | 22 | 53 | Young age, late stage of the disease and high CSF protein value - Poor outcome | |
Yaramiş A et al26, Turkey | Retrospective record review, 1988-1996 | 214 children with CNS TB aged between 3 months and 15 yr | *** 1-10 2-56 3-34 | 2HRS or Z/10 HR steroid therapy in the first month | 23 | Early VP shunting for hydrocephalus - Better outcome Children less than five years - Poor outcome | ||
van Well et al32, Cape Town, South Africa | Retrospective cohort study, 1985-2005 | 554 children diagnosed with TBM, 2 months to 15 yr | 1-2.6 2-57.3 3-40.1 (Modified criteria of MRC staging) | 6 HRZEth steroid in the first month | 16 | 13 | 71 | African ethnicity, stage 3 of disease, motor deficits, brainstem dysfunction, and cerebral infarctions - Poor outcome |
Miftode et al33, Romania | Retrospective record review, 2004-2013 | 77 children diagnosed with TBM, 3 months to 15 yr | 1-26 2-52 3-22 (Gordon and Parson)88 | 2-3HRZE/7-9 HR3 | 8 | 36 | - | |
Güneş et al59, Turkey | Retrospective record review, 1998-2008 | 185 children with TBM, 4 months to 18 yr | 1-36.8 2-30.8 3-32.4 (BMRC staging) | 2HRS, Z or E/10 HR steroids in the first month | 13 | Diagnosis at early stage - Better outcome | ||
Nabukeera- Barungi et al90, Cape town, South Africa** | Retrospective record review, 2009 | 40 children with TBM aged between 6 wk to 12 yr | 2-50# 3-50 (Modified criteria of MRC staging) | RHZEth with steroids Neurosurgical procedures-25% | 43 | 8 | 49 | Stage 3 on admission, longer mean hospital stay, surgery - Poor outcome |
Faella et al91, Italy | Retrospective study, 1986-2001 | 32 children with TBM aged between 8 and 160 months | 1-16 2-30 3-53 (MRC staging) | 2 HRS (with E or Z for 10 patients)/10-18 HR, Steroids for 3-6 wk | 13 | 19 | Quick normalization of CSF parameters (proteins, glucose, cells) - better outcome Long-lasting pre-admission non-specific symptoms, elevated CSF protein, stage 3 disease and ventricular dilation - Poor outcome | |
Rohlwink et al92, South Africa | Prospective cohort study, October 2010 and August 2013 | 44 children with TBM and associated hydrocephalus aged between 3 months to 13 yr | 1-9 2a-38.6 2b-31.8 3-20.5 (Refined criteria of MRC staging) | 2 HRZEth/4-6 HR Steroids for 3 wk | 16 | 36.6 | Elevated polymorphonuclear cells in CSF - Better outcome Multiple or large infarcts, - Poor outcome | |
Bang et al93, Vietnam | Prospective descriptive study, October 2009-March 2011 | 100 children with TBM, aged between 2 and 180 months | Children >5 yr (Modified MRC staging) 1-48 2-33 3-18 Children <5 yr (Blantyre coma score) 1-64 2-18 3-18 | 2HRZES/1HRZE/5HRE with adjuvant steroids Outcome Death - 15.7% Severe disability -7.4% Intermediate disability - 26% | 15.7 | History of coma, seizures, neck stiffness, decreased level of consciousness, FND, Stage 3 disease - Poor outcome | ||
Dhawan et al94, India | Prospective cohort study (October 2010 to June 2012) | 130 children | 1-20 3-36.9 (Modified MRC staging) | 2HREZ/10 HR with adjuvant steroids Outcome at discharge: Death - 29% | 29 | 26.5 | Stage 3 at presentation, infarcts in neuroimaging - Poor outcome |
**Treatment recommendations as per the National Guidelines changed over the period surveyed and patients received various combinations of anti-TB drugs, ***Staging of disease severity explained but name of the staging method not mentioned, #Staging was done for only 18 patients, for whom GCS was available. VP ratio - ventricular diameter at the midportion of the body of the lateral ventricles and P is the biparietal diameter measured from inner table to inner table. MRC, Medical Research Council; ATT, antituberculosis therapy; BMRC, British MRC; CNS, central nervous system; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; FND, focal neurological deficit; R, rifampicin; H, isoniazid; E, ethambutol; Eth, ethionamide; Z, pyrazinamide; S, streptomycin; TBM, tuberculous meningitis; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; CT, computed tomography; TB, tuberculosis; BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin
Hyponatremia is common in TBM. A study among children with TBM in Mumbai showed that around 39 per cent of the children with TBM had hyponatremia and the cerebral salt-wasting syndrome was more common than syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone. Higher mortality rate was observed in children with hyponatremia than children with normal levels96. Appropriate management of this electrolyte imbalance is important in improving the treatment outcomes.
Prevention
WHO recommends that Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) needs to be given at birth or shortly after birth97. BCG vaccine protects against TBM-associated mortality, especially in the first two years of life57. Kumar et al98 reported that BCG failed to give protection for those who were more than five years of age if the weight was 60 per cent less than that of the expected weight for age and in the presence of a household contact with TB. One case of TBM is prevented for every 3500 inoculations of BCG vaccine, and the efficacy against meningitis is around 73 per cent99. Even though BCG vaccination does not totally prevent the occurrence of TBM, vaccinated children with TBM have better mentation and outcomes than unvaccinated children100. Farinha et al19 reported that none of the BCG-vaccinated children with TBM died or had severe sequelae. Perhaps, the most important way to prevent TBM is to provide TB preventive therapy to young child contacts of TB patients.
Future research
Marais et al101 proposed standardized methods to do research in TBM which could improve the quality of future research and provide basis for a global TBM data repository. Dhawan and Sankhyan102 suggested additional details which could be included to this set of guidelines. However, these guidelines should be validated to improve future TBM research.
Way forward
Data regarding the global as well as the regional burden of paediatric EPTB, especially TBM are limited. Surveillance system strengthening across the globe, especially in high-burden countries is urgently needed for implementation of appropriate preventative and treatment measures. Clinical features of paediatric TBM often mimic diseases due to viral, bacterial and fungal infections. Children often present in the late stage of the disease which is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Hence, a high degree of suspicion is needed for the early diagnosis and management. Children have different disease manifestations than adults, with apparently low mortality but high risk for neurocognitive and behavioural disabilities. WHO recommends the use of Xpert MTB/RIF as the initial diagnostic test in children with TBM for testing CSF. The more sensitive Xpert ultra has been introduced but its testing in children is limited. Treatment of TBM is based on the regimen for pulmonary TB. Previous studies show that R concentrations achieved in the plasma and CSF are subtherapeutic; E and S do not penetrate the CSF. Adjunctive and host-directed therapies show promise in small groups of patients (Table II). Most antimicrobial treatment studies have been observational or retrospective reviews; hence, randomized clinical trials need to be planned to identify an ideal regimen with optimal dosages for the paediatric TBM management to improve the treatment outcomes in this population.
Table II.
Existing gaps | Research needs |
---|---|
Disease burden of EPTB especially TBM and DR-TBM in children | Strengthening surveillance system across the globe especially in high burden countries6. |
Diagnostic challenges | Role of newer molecular tests such as Xpert Ultra for the early detection of TB in children and in extrapulmonary specimens41. Point-of-care rapid tests for diagnosis. |
Children prone to poor prognosis | Biomarkers to identify children prone to poor outcomes including death, neurological deficits and neurocognitive, behavioural disabilities. Role of adjunctive therapy in improving the treatment outcomes80 |
Treatment regimens with poor CSF penetration and concentration | PK studies to understand the CSF concentrations of the ATT67. Studies to determine the association of CSF concentrations of ATT and treatment outcome. |
Use of varied treatment regimen with different dosages and duration in different regions of the globe | Efficacious and effective regimen to improve treatment outcomes69,77. |
H prophylaxis for childhood contacts | Strategies to strengthen the H prophylaxis for contacts of TB patients. |
Research methodology | Prospective studies and randomized control trials with uniform strategies and format for better understanding of the disease and improve treatment outcomes101,102. |
TB, tuberculosis; EPTB, extrapulmonary TB; DR, drug-resistant; ATT, antituberculosis therapy; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; H, isoniazid; PK, pharmacokinetics
Acknowledgment
Authors thank Dr Kelly E Dooley, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA, for her inputs.
Footnotes
Financial support & sponsorship: The study was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD074944).
Conflicts of Interest: None.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. Roadmap for childhood tuberculosis: towards zero deaths. Geneva: WHO; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dodd PJ, Gardiner E, Coghlan R, Seddon JA. Burden of childhood tuberculosis in 22 high-burden countries: A mathematical modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e453–9. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70245-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thwaites GE, van Toorn R, Schoeman J. Tuberculous meningitis: More questions, still too few answers. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:999–1010. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70168-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chiang SS, Khan FA, Milstein MB, Tolman AW, Benedetti A, Starke JR, et al. Treatment outcomes of childhood tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14:947–57. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70852-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Buonsenso D, Serranti D, Valentini P. Management of central nervous system tuberculosis in children: Light and shade. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:845–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ducomble T, Tolksdorf K, Karagiannis I, Hauer B, Brodhun B, Haas W, et al. The burden of extrapulmonary and meningitis tuberculosis: An investigation of national surveillance data, Germany, 2002 to 2009. Euro Surveill. 2013;18 pii: 20436. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mihailidou E, Goutaki M, Nanou A, Tsiatsiou O, Kavaliotis J. Tuberculous meningitis in Greek children. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012;44:337–43. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.639030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu XR, Yin QQ, Jiao AX, Xu BP, Sun L, Jiao WW, et al. Pediatric tuberculosis at Beijing children's hospital: 2002-2010. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1433–40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nicholas AB, Kim KS, Bishai WR, Jain SK. Pathogenesis of central nervous system tuberculosis. Curr Mol Med. 2009;9:94–9. doi: 10.2174/156652409787581655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Isabel BE, Rogelio HP. Pathogenesis and immune response in tuberculous meningitis. Malays J Med Sci. 2014;21:4–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gupta S, Chopra K. Tuberculous meningitis in children. Indian J Tuberc. 1981;28:3–11. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jain SK, Paul-Satyaseela M, Lamichhane G, Kim KS, Bishai WR. Mycobacterium tuberculosis invasion and traversal across an in vitro human blood-brain barrier as a pathogenic mechanism for central nervous system tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1287–95. doi: 10.1086/502631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Visser DH, Solomons RS, Ronacher K, van Well GT, Heymans MW, Walzl G, et al. Host immune response to tuberculous meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:177–87. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rock RB, Olin M, Baker CA, Molitor TW, Peterson PK. Central nervous system tuberculosis: Pathogenesis and clinical aspects. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:243–61. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00042-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chatterjee S. Brain tuberculomas, tubercular meningitis, and post-tubercular hydrocephalus in children. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2011;6:S96–100. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.85725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tandon PN, Ramamurthi R. Textbook of neurosurgery. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. New Delhi: JP Medical Ltd; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Toorn R, Solomons R. Update on the diagnosis and management of tuberculous meningitis in children. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2014;21:12–8. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ramzan A, Nayil K, Asimi R, Wani A, Makhdoomi R, Jain A, et al. Childhood tubercular meningitis: An institutional experience and analysis of predictors of outcome. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;48:30–5. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2012.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farinha NJ, Razali KA, Holzel H, Morgan G, Novelli VM. Tuberculosis of the central nervous system in children: A 20-year survey. J Infect. 2000;41:61–8. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2000.0692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karande S, Gupta V, Kulkarni M, Joshi A. Prognostic clinical variables in childhood tuberculous meningitis: An experience from Mumbai, India. Neurol India. 2005;53:191–5. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.16407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alarcón F, Moreira J, Rivera J, Salinas R, Dueñas G, Van den Ende J, et al. Tuberculous meningitis: Do modern diagnostic tools offer better prognosis prediction? Indian J Tuberc. 2013;60:5–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.van Toorn R, Springer P, Laubscher JA, Schoeman JF. Value of different staging systems for predicting neurological outcome in childhood tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16:628–32. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Principi N, Esposito S. Diagnosis and therapy of tuberculous meningitis in children. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2012;92:377–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2012.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nagarathna S, Chandramuki A, Veenakumari HB. Laboratory diagnosis of meningitis. INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2012. [accessed on August 25, 2016]. Available from: http://www.cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/34329.pdf . [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thilothammal N, Krishnamurthy PV, Banu K, Ratnam SR. Tuberculous meningitis in children – Clinical profile, mortality and morbidity of bacteriologically confirmed cases. Indian Pediatr. 1995;32:641–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yaramiş A, Gurkan F, Elevli M, Söker M, Haspolat K, Kirbaş G, et al. Central nervous system tuberculosis in children: A review of 214 cases. Pediatrics. 1998;102:E49. doi: 10.1542/peds.102.5.e49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marais S, Thwaites G, Schoeman JF, Török ME, Misra UK, Prasad K, et al. Tuberculous meningitis: A uniform case definition for use in clinical research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:803–12. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Solomons RS, Wessels M, Visser DH, Donald PR, Marais BJ, Schoeman JF, et al. Uniform research case definition criteria differentiate tuberculous and bacterial meningitis in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59:1574–8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Solomons RS, Visser DH, Donald PR, Marais BJ, Schoeman JF, van Furth AM, et al. The diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid chemistry results in childhood tuberculous meningitis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31:1335–40. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2745-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Solomons RS, Visser DH, Marais BJ, Schoeman JF, van Furth AM. Diagnostic accuracy of a uniform research case definition for TBM in children: A prospective study. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20:903–8. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bhigjee AI, Padayachee R, Paruk H, Hallwirth-Pillay KD, Marais S, Connoly C, et al. Diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: Clinical and laboratory parameters. Int J Infect Dis. 2007;11:348–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.van Well GT, Paes BF, Terwee CB, Springer P, Roord JJ, Donald PR, et al. Twenty years of pediatric tuberculous meningitis: A retrospective cohort study in the Western Cape of South Africa. Pediatrics. 2009;123:e1–8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Miftode EG, Dorneanu OS, Leca DA, Juganariu G, Teodor A, Hurmuzache M, et al. Tuberculous meningitis in children and adults: A 10-year retrospective comparative analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Venkataswamy MM, Rafi W, Nagarathna S, Ravi V, Chandramuki A. Comparative evaluation of BACTEC 460TB system and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for the isolation of M.tuberculosis from cerebrospinal fluid samples of tuberculous meningitis patients. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:236–40. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.34765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Solomons RS, Visser DH, Friedrich SO, Diacon AH, Hoek KG, Marais BJ, et al. Improved diagnosis of childhood tuberculous meningitis using more than one nucleic acid amplification test. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:74–80. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pai M, Flores LL, Pai N, Hubbard A, Riley LW, Colford JM, Jr, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculous meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3:633–43. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00772-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bhatia R, Dayal R, Jindal S, Agarwal D, Goyal A. GeneXpert for diagnosis of tubercular meningitis. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:1353–5. doi: 10.1007/s12098-016-2096-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nhu NT, Heemskerk D, Thu do DA, Chau TT, Mai NT, Nghia HD, et al. Evaluation of geneXpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:226–33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01834-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.World Health Organization. Xpert MTB/RIF implementation manual technical and operational ‘how-to’: Practical considerations. Geneva: WHO; 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sharma SK, Ryan H, Khaparde S, Sachdeva KS, Singh AD, Mohan A, et al. Index-TB guidelines: Guidelines on extrapulmonary tuberculosis For India. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145:448–63. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1950_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.World Health Organization. WHO Meeting Report of a Technical Expert Consultation: Non-Inferiority Analysis of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Compared to Xpert MTB/RIF. Geneva: WHO; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thakur R, Goyal R, Sarma S. Laboratory diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis - is there a scope for further improvement? J Lab Physicians. 2010;2:21–4. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.66705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Modi M, Sharma K, Sharma M, Sharma A, Sharma N, Sharma S, et al. Multitargeted loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20:625–30. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Berwal A, Chawla K, Vishwanath S, Shenoy VP. Role of multiplex polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing tubercular meningitis. J Lab Physicians. 2017;9:145–7. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.199633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Pienaar M, Andronikou S, van Toorn R. MRI to demonstrate diagnostic features and complications of TBM not seen with CT. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25:941–7. doi: 10.1007/s00381-008-0785-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Botha H, Ackerman C, Candy S, Carr JA, Griffith-Richards S, Bateman KJ, et al. Reliability and diagnostic performance of CT imaging criteria in the diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ozateş M, Kemaloglu S, Gürkan F, Ozkan U, Hoşoglu S, Simşek MM, et al. CT of the brain in tuberculous meningitis. A review of 289 patients. Acta Radiol. 2000;41:13–7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2000.041001013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kalita J, Misra UK, Ranjan P. Predictors of long-term neurological sequelae of tuberculous meningitis: A multivariate analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14:33–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01534.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nogueira Delfino L, Fariello G, Lancella L, Marabotto C, Menchini L, Devito R, et al. Central nervous system tuberculosis in non-HIV-positive children: A single-center, 6 year experience. Radiol Med. 2012;117:669–78. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0743-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rohlwink UK, Kilborn T, Wieselthaler N, Banderker E, Zwane E, Figaji AA, et al. Imaging features of the brain, cerebral vessels and spine in pediatric tuberculous meningitis with associated hydrocephalus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35:e301–10. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Schoeman JF, Laubscher JA, Donald PR. Serial lumbar CSF pressure measurements and cranial computed tomographic findings in childhood tuberculous meningitits. Childs Nerv Syst. 2000;16:203–8. doi: 10.1007/s003810050497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.van der Weert EM, Hartgers NM, Schaaf HS, Eley BS, Pitcher RD, Wieselthaler NA, et al. Comparison of diagnostic criteria of tuberculous meningitis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected and uninfected children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:65–9. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000183751.75880.f8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Dekker G, Andronikou S, van Toorn R, Scheepers S, Brandt A, Ackermann C, et al. MRI findings in children with tuberculous meningitis: A comparison of HIV-infected and non-infected patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:1943–9. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1451-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rana SV, Singhal RK, Singh K, Kumar L. Adenosine deaminase levels in cerebrospinal fluid as a diagnostic test for tuberculous meningitis in children. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2004;19:5–9. doi: 10.1007/BF02894249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gupta BK, Bharat V, Bandyopadhyay D, Chambial S. Role of cerebrospinal fluid adenosine deaminase level estimation in diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. J Indian Med Assoc. 2013;111:603–5, 608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Solomons RS, Goussard P, Visser DH, Marais BJ, Gie RP, Schoeman JF, et al. Chest radiograph findings in children with tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:200–4. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.14.0634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kelekçi S, Karabel M, Karabel D, Hamidi C, Hoşoǧlu S, Gürkan MF, et al. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin is a preventive factor in mortality of childhood tuberculous meningitis. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;21:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Israni AV, Dave DA, Mandal A, Singh A, Sahi PK, Das RR, et al. Tubercular meningitis in children: Clinical, pathological, and radiological profile and factors associated with mortality. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7:400–4. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.181475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Güneş A, Uluca Ü, Aktar F, Konca Ç, Şen V, Ece A, et al. Clinical, radiological and laboratory findings in 185 children with tuberculous meningitis at a single centre and relationship with the stage of the disease. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:75. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0186-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mahadevan B, Mahadevan S, Serane VT, Narasimhan R. Tuberculin reactivity in tuberculous meningitis. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:213–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02859258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Saitoh A, Pong A, Waecker NJ, Jr, Leake JA, Nespeca MP, Bradley JS, et al. Prediction of neurologic sequelae in childhood tuberculous meningitis: A review of 20 cases and proposal of a novel scoring system. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005;24:207–12. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000154321.61866.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Andronikou S, Wilmshurst J, Hatherill M, VanToorn R. Distribution of brain infarction in children with tuberculous meningitis and correlation with outcome score at 6 months. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:1289–94. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0319-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Thwaites G, Fisher M, Hemingway C, Scott G, Solomon T, Innes J, et al. British infection society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis of the central nervous system in adults and children. J Infect. 2009;59:167–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.World Health Organization. Rapid advice: Treatment of tuberculosis in children. Geneva: WHO; 2010. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ellard GA, Humphries MJ, Allen BW. Cerebrospinal fluid drug concentrations and the treatment of tuberculous meningitis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148:650–5. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Donald PR, Schoeman JF, Van Zyl LE, De Villiers JN, Pretorius M, Springer P, et al. Intensive short course chemotherapy in the management of tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998;2:704–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pouplin T, Bang ND, Toi PV, Phuong PN, Dung NH, Duong TN, et al. Naïve-pooled pharmacokinetic analysis of pyrazinamide, isoniazid and rifampicin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of vietnamese children with tuberculous meningitis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:144. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1470-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ruslami R, Ganiem AR, Dian S, Apriani L, Achmad TH, van der Ven AJ, et al. Intensified regimen containing rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis: An open-label, randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:27–35. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70264-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Savic RM, Ruslami R, Hibma JE, Hesseling A, Ramachandran G, Ganiem AR, et al. Pediatric tuberculous meningitis: Model-based approach to determining optimal doses of the anti-tuberculosis drugs rifampin and levofloxacin for children. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98:622–9. doi: 10.1002/cpt.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Te Brake L, Dian S, Ganiem AR, Ruesen C, Burger D, Donders R, et al. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of an intensified regimen containing rifampicin and moxifloxacin for tuberculous meningitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45:496–503. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ellard GA, Humphries MJ, Gabriel M, Teoh R. Penetration of pyrazinamide into the cerebrospinal fluid in tuberculous meningitis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987;294:284–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6567.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mehlhorn AJ, Brown DA. Safety concerns with fluoroquinolones. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1859–66. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Donald PR, Seifart HI. Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of ethionamide in children with tuberculous meningitis. J Pediatr. 1989;115:483–6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80862-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services. Revised national tuberculosis control programme technical and operational guidelines for TB control in India 2016. New Delhi: Central TB Division; 2016. [accessed on January 12, 2017]. Available from: https://www.tbcindia.gov.in/showfile.php?lid=3219 . [Google Scholar]
- 75.Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Index TB Guidelines: Guidelines on extra-pulmonary tuberculosis for India. New Delhi: World Health Organization; 2016. [accessed April 11, 2018]. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Donald PR. Antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in children. Pediatr Rep. 2011;3:e16. doi: 10.4081/pr.2011.e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.van Toorn R, Schaaf HS, Laubscher JA, van Elsland SL, Donald PR, Schoeman JF, et al. Short intensified treatment in children with drug-susceptible tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014;33:248–52. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.World Health Organization. Guidelines for managing advanced HIV disease and rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy. Geneva: WHO; 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Prasad K, Singh MB, Ryan H. Corticosteroids for managing tuberculous meningitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD002244. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002244.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ordonez AA, Maiga M, Gupta S, Weinstein EA, Bishai WR, Jain SK, et al. Novel adjunctive therapies for the treatment of tuberculosis. Curr Mol Med. 2014;14:385–95. doi: 10.2174/1566524013666131118112431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ndlovu H, Marakalala MJ. Granulomas and inflammation: Host-directed therapies for tuberculosis. Front Immunol. 2016;7:434. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tsenova L, Sokol K, Victoria HF, Kaplan G. A combination of thalidomide plus antibiotics protects rabbits from mycobacterial meningitis-associated death. J Infec Dis. 1998;177:1563–72. doi: 10.1086/515327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Schoeman JF, Springer P, van Rensburg AJ, Swanevelder S, Hanekom WA, Haslett PA, et al. Adjunctive thalidomide therapy for childhood tuberculous meningitis: Results of a randomized study. J Child Neurol. 2004;19:250–7. doi: 10.1177/088307380401900402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Schoeman JF, Janse van Rensburg A, Laubscher JA, Springer P. The role of aspirin in childhood tuberculous meningitis. J Child Neurol. 2011;26:956–62. doi: 10.1177/0883073811398132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Kemaloglu S, Ozkan U, Bukte Y, Ceviz A, Ozates M. Timing of shunt surgery in childhood tuberculous meningitis with hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002;37:194–8. doi: 10.1159/000065398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Padayatchi N, Bamber S, Dawood H, Bobat R. Multidrug-resistant tuberculous meningitis in children in Durban, South Africa. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25:147–50. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000199314.88063.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Seddon JA, Visser DH, Bartens M, Jordaan AM, Victor TC, van Furth AM, et al. Impact of drug resistance on clinical outcome in children with tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31:711–6. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318253acf8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gordon A, Parsons M. The place of corticosteroids in the management of tuberculous meningitis. Br J Hosp Med. 1972;7:651–5. [Google Scholar]
- 89.Ramachandran P, Duraipandian M, Nagarajan M, Prabhakar R, Ramakrishnan CV, Tripathy SP, et al. Three chemotherapy studies of tuberculous meningitis in children. Tubercle. 1986;67:17–29. doi: 10.1016/0041-3879(86)90028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nabukeera-Barungi N, Wilmshurst J, Rudzani M, Nuttall J. Presentation and outcome of tuberculous meningitis among children: Experiences from a tertiary children's hospital. Afr Health Sci. 2014;14:143–9. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v14i1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Faella FS, Pagliano P, Attanasio V, Rossi M, Rescigno C, Scarano F, et al. Factors influencing the presentation and outcome of tuberculous meningitis in childhood. In Vivo. 2006;20:187–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rohlwink UK, Donald K, Gavine B, Padayachy L, Wilmshurst JM, Fieggen GA, et al. Clinical characteristics and neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with tuberculous meningitis and hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:461–8. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Bang ND, Caws M, Truc TT, Duong TN, Dung NH, Ha DT, et al. Clinical presentations, diagnosis, mortality and prognostic markers of tuberculous meningitis in vietnamese children: A prospective descriptive study. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:573. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1923-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Dhawan SR, Gupta A, Singhi P, Sankhyan N, Malhi P, Khandelwal N, et al. Predictors of neurological outcome of tuberculous meningitis in childhood: A prospective cohort study from a developing country. J Child Neurol. 2016;31:1622–7. doi: 10.1177/0883073816668112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mohan J, Rakesh PS, Moses PD, Varkki S. Outcome of children with tuberculous meningitis: A prospective study from a tertiary care centre in Southern India. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;4:220–3. [Google Scholar]
- 96.Inamdar P, Masavkar S, Shanbag P. Hyponatremia in children with tuberculous meningitis: A hospital-based cohort study. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2016;11:182–7. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.193376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.World Health Organization. BCG vaccine: WHO position paper, February 2018–recommendations. Vaccine. 2018;36:3408–10. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Kumar P, Kumar R, Srivastava KL, Kumar M. Protective role of BCG vaccination against tuberculous meningitis in Indian children: A reappraisal. Natl Med J India. 2005;18:7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Trunz BB, Fine P, Dye C. Effect of BCG vaccination on childhood tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis worldwide: A meta-analysis and assessment of cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2006;367:1173–80. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68507-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kumar R, Dwivedi A, Kumar P, Kohli N. Tuberculous meningitis in BCG vaccinated and unvaccinated children. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:1550–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.065201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Marais BJ, Heemskerk AD, Marais SS, van Crevel R, Rohlwink U, Caws M, et al. Standardized methods for enhanced quality and comparability of tuberculous meningitis studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:501–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Dhawan SR, Sankhyan N. Additional details for improved reporting of tuberculous meningitis studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1804–5. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]