Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;37(9):1165–1176. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00811-7

Table 3.

Comparison of three Polish EQ-5D value sets

Polish EQ-5D-5L value set Polish EQ-5D-5L crosswalk value set Polish EQ-5D-3L value set
Valuation method Hybrid (TTO/DCE) Crosswalk (TTO) TTO
Dimensions ordering, from the most to the least important (disutility for the worse level within a dimension)

PD (− 0.575)

MO (− 0.314)

SC (− 0.264)

AD (− 0.232)

UA (− 0.205)

PD (− 0.489)a

MO (− 0.331)

SC (− 0.235)

UA (− 0.212)

AD (− 0.207)

PD (− 0.489)a

MO (− 0.331)

SC (− 0.235)

UA (− 0.212)

AD (− 0.207)

Number of health states 3125 3125 243
Maximum value (11111) 1 1 1
Second highest value (health state) 0.982 (11112) 0.940 (11112) 0.925 (11112)
Mean value (SD) 0.476 (0.286) 0.448 (0.253) 0.382 (0.310)
Median value (Q1–Q3) 0.523 (0.286–0.692) 0.483 (0.282–0.642) 0.406 (0.155–0.630)
Minimum value (health state) − 0.590 (55555) − 0.523 (55555) − 0.523 (33333)
Value for 22222 0.862 0.760 0.716
Value for 33333 0.721 0.716 −0.523
Value for 44444 0.173 0.336 n.a.
Health states ≥0.8, n (%) 160 (5.1) 163 (5.2) 22 (9.1)
Health states worse than dead (<0), n (%) 137 (4.4) 124 (4.0) 32 (13.2)

AD anxiety/depression, DCE discrete choice experiment, MO mobility, n.a., PD pain/discomfort, SC self-care, SD standard deviation, TTO time trade-off, UA usual activities

aDisutilities for dimensions, not including the constant (− 0.049)