Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2019 Nov 4;180(2):320–322. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4714

Association Between Prescribed Opioids and Infections in Patients With Neutropenia and Cancer

Carolin E M Jakob 1, Melanie Stecher 2, Annika Y Claßen 1, Axel Hamprecht 3, Oliver A Cornely 1, Jörg J Vehreschild 4,
PMCID: PMC6830429  PMID: 31682679

Abstract

This nested case-control study examines the association of risk of infection with opioid use in immunocompromised patients.


In a recent article, Edelman and colleagues1 identified an association between prescribed opioids and risk for community-acquired pneumonia among patients with and without HIV infection. This is of concern for immunocompromised patients receiving opioids for cancer pain. We used the prospective Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (NCT01821456) to confirm this observation in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Methods

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University Hospital of Cologne, which waived written informed consent. We conducted a nested case-control study based on patients with cancer with an absolute neutrophil count of less than 500/μL treated between January 2008 and December 2018. A multivariable conditional logistic regression was performed resembling the analysis by Edelman et al1 (excluding vaccines; Veterans Aging Cohort Study score; benzodiazepines, including antibacterial/antifungal prophylaxis; and Charlson comorbidity index2). Opioids were categorized as previously described,1 adding buprenorphine to the nonimmunosuppressive groups3 as well as piritramide and tilidine to the unknown group. Case study patients were inpatients with hospital-acquired infection (fever ≥38 °C, blood stream infection, pneumonia, or intensive care unit admission) and no baseline infection. Controls were matched 1:1 by age (aged within 5 years), sex, underlying disease, and time of admission (within 1 year) using the Gower coefficient. Sensitivity analyses were performed including (1) the effect of the opioid treatment duration, (2) the effect of preexisting outpatient opioid treatment, and (3) the association of opioid treatment with pneumonia only instead of the composite end point.

Results

We identified 2135 matched pairs with complete data sets, based on 3942 cases and 2949 controls in the cohort database. Opioids were administered in 371 of 2135 patient cases (17.4%) and 354 of 2135 patient controls (16.6%) (Table). No association of opioid administration was observed with the risk for infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.11 with immunosuppressive properties and aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86-1.43 without immunosuppressive properties) (Table). Patients with opioids from the unknown category, mostly meperidine (33 of 50 patient cases; 14 of 22 patient controls), showed an increased infection risk.

Table. Patient Characteristics and Conditional Logistic Regression for Administered Opioids and Infection Riska.

Characteristic No. (%) Univariate Analysis, OR (95% CI) P Value Multivariable Analysis, OR (95% CI) P Value
Incidence of Infectionb No Incidence of Infectionb
Total, No./total (%)c 2135/3942 (54.2) 2135/2949 (72.4)
Observation, median (IQR), d 9 (3-14) 11 (7-19)
Age, median (IQR), y 54 (41-65) 54 (40-65)
Sex
Male 1322 (61.9) 1322 (61.9)
Female 813 (38.1) 813 (38.1)
Underlying disease
Lymphoma 918 (43.0) 918 (43.0)
Acute myeloid leukemia 318 (14.9) 318 (14.9)
Acute lymphatic leukemia 175 (8.2) 175 (8.2)
Chronic lymphatic leukemia 159 (7.4) 159 (7.4)
Solid tumor 156 (7.3) 156 (7.3)
Otherd 181 (8.4) 181 (8.4)
Opioids
Any 371 (17.4) 354 (16.6)
None (reference) 1764 (82.6) 1781 (83.4)
Immunosuppressive propertiese 128 (6.0) 146 (6.8) 0.88 (0.67-1.15) .37 0.84 (0.64-1.11) .22
Nonimmunosuppressive propertiesf 193 (9.0) 186 (8.7) 1.08 (0.84-1.38) .55 1.11 (0.86-1.43) .43
Unknown immunosuppressive propertiesg 50 (2.3) 22 (1.0) 2.49 (1.45-4.25) <.001 2.59 (1.49-4.48) <.001
Antibiotic prophylaxis 823 (38.5) 1037 (48.6) 0.63 (0.56-0.72 <.001 0.61 (0.53-0.70) <.001
Antifungal prophylaxis 1141 (53.4) 1152 (54.0) 0.98 (0.86-1.11) .73 1.04 (0.92-1.19) .52
Glucocorticosteroids 1124 (52.6) 1089 (51.0) 1.07 (0.95-1.21) .27 1.13 (0.99-1.29) .06
Smoking (vs none and unknown) 1959 (91.8) 1944 (91.1)
Current 104 (4.9) 107 (5.0) 0.95 (0.69-1.30) .73 0.90 (0.65-1.26) .56
Former 72 (3.3) 84 (3.9) 0.82 (0.57-1.17) .27 0.78 (0.54-1.13) .19
Diabetes mellitus 233 (10.9) 250 (11.7) 0.91 (0.73-1.12 .36 0.84 (0.67-1.04) .11
Hepatitis C 43 (2.0) 21 (1.0) 2.22 (1.27-3.88) .005 2.29 (1.30-4.07) .004
HIV 92 (4.3) 97 (4.5) 0.92 (0.64-1.32) .64 0.93 (0.62-1.39) .72
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 82 (3.8) 79 (3.7) 1.06 (0.73-1.53) .78 0.99 (0.67-1.46) .95
Congestive heart failure 15 (0.7) 20 (0.9) 0.74 (0.37-1.47) .39 0.72 (0.36-1.45) .35
Stroke 12 (0.6) 9 (0.4) 1.33 (0.56-3.16) .51 1.26 (0.52-3.06) .62
Pain-related diagnosish 263 (12.3) 222 (10.4) 1.22 (1.00-1.48) .046 1.26 (1.03-1.54) .02
Alcohol-related diagnosis 15 (0.7) 8 (0.4) 2.00 (0.81-4.96) .13 2.39 (0.93-6.18) .07
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR)i 2 (2-6) 2 (2-6) 1.01 (0.99-1.03) .34 1.01 (0.99-1.04) .33

Abbreviations: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; OR, odds ratio; and ellipses, variables used for matching, not included in regression analysis.

a

Clinical characteristics based on presence of International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) Code and/or variable defined in the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients database (eg, medication, smoking, and alcohol). Hepatitis C defined by positive antibody or detectable RNA.

b

Infection defined as body temperature of 38°C or higher, bloodstream infection, pneumonia, or admission to intensive care unit.

c

1:1 matching by age (aged within 5 years), sex, underlying disease, and time of admission (within 1 year) using the Gower coefficient.

d

Myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myeloid leukemia, other (eg, HIV).

e

Immunosuppressive properties: diamorphine, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, morphinhydrochloride, morphine sulfate, sufentanil, sufentanil citrate.1

f

No immunosuppressive properties: buprenorphine,3 hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxycodone/naloxone, tramadol.1

g

Unknown immunosuppressive properties: levomethadone, methadone, meperidine, tapentadol,1 piritramide, tilidine, tilidine/naloxone.

h

Defined according to Edelman et al.1

i

10-year survival probability using 0.983exp(CCI × 0.9), Charlson comorbidity index, determined using ICD-10 codes of diagnoses.2

Sensitivity analysis revealed an association of longer opioid treatment with increased infection risk (aOR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98 with immunosuppressive properties and aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99 without immunosuppressive properties). Overall results were stable after excluding patients with preexisting opioid treatment from multivariable analysis (censored patient cases n = 143, patient controls n = 141; aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.67-1.42 and aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.91-1.76, respectively). There was also no relevant change when using only pneumonia as a clinical end point (patient cases n = 1072; aOR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.75-1.34 with immunosuppressive properties and aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.79-1.53 without immunosuppressive properties).

Discussion

In our analysis, we were not able to identify an increased risk for pneumonia or any infection by any type of opioid in severely immunocompromised patients with an overall infection risk of more than 50% during the observational period. An association of infection with meperidine use is probably based on this drug being a standard treatment for severe mucositis, an acknowledged infection risk. In contrast to the study by Edelman et al,1 we observed patients during a rather short period of severe immunosuppression, and the previously observed effects of opioids may therefore not have had the same effect in our cohort. The severity of immunosuppression and the better supervision of inpatients in our cohort compared with outpatients in the study by Edelman et al1 may have masked a comparably smaller effect of opioids.

A strength of our study is the higher homogeneity of patients regarding the indication of opioid treatment (cancer pain). Despite the great efforts of Edelman et al1 to control confounders, opioid use in veterans with and without HIV infection is a powerful surrogate for a large range of detrimental health conditions (opioid use for musculoskeletal and bone diseases with decreased mobility4 or chronic cough [dihydrocodeine]).5

Further observation, ideally in a controlled prospective trial, is warranted before adapting current standards in cancer care.

References

  • 1.Edelman EJ, Gordon KS, Crothers K, et al. Association of prescribed opioids with increased risk of community-acquired pneumonia among patients with and without HIV. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(3):297-304. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11):1130-1139. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wiese AD, Grijalva CG. The use of prescribed opioid analgesics & the risk of serious infections. Future Microbiol. 2018;13(8):849-852. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2018-0101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, Tinetti ME. Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yancy WS Jr, McCrory DC, Coeytaux RR, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of treatments for chronic cough: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2013;144(6):1827-1838. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES