Skip to main content
The Veterinary Quarterly logoLink to The Veterinary Quarterly
. 2018 Jun 5;38(1):63–66. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2018.1482028

Chlamydia psittaci and C. avium in feral pigeon (Columba livia domestica) droppings in two cities in the Netherlands

Sara A Burt a,, Romy E Röring a, Marloes Heijne b
PMCID: PMC6831002  PMID: 29806552

Abstract

Background: Feral pigeons (Columba livia domestica) live and breed in many city centres and contact with their droppings can be a hazard for human health if the birds carry Chlamydia psittaci.

Objective: The aim of this study was to establish whether pigeon droppings in two Dutch cities (Utrecht and Haarlem) contain C. psittaci and/or C. avium, which could be a potential hazard for transmission to humans.

Methods: In May 2017 seven feral pigeon ‘hot spots’ with between 5 and 40+ pigeons present were identified in two cities by visual observations over two days. During the following ten days fresh droppings were collected at these hot spots and the samples were pooled per three droppings to achieve 40–41 samples per city. Samples were analysed for Chlamydia DNA with a broad range 23S Chlamydiaceae Real-Time PCR and positive samples were tested with a specific C. psittaci and C. avium Real-Time PCR. Positive C. psittaci samples were genotyped.

Results:C. psittaci and C. avium were detected in both cities. For C. psittaci the prevalences in Utrecht and Haarlem were 2.4% and 7.5%, respectively; for C. avium 36.6% and 20.0%, respectively. One sample contained both species. All C. psittaci samples belonged to genotype B.

Conclusion:C. psittaci and C. avium are present in feral pigeon droppings in Utrecht and Haarlem. Human contact with droppings from infected pigeons or inhalation of dust from dried droppings represent a potential hazard to public health.

Keywords: Pigeon, feral, Chlamydia psittaci, Chlamydia avium, psittacosis

1. Introduction

Many people enjoy seeing and feeding the feral pigeons (Columba livia domestica) that live in city centres and parks. However, contact with pigeons or their droppings can be a health hazard since the birds can carry zoonoses such as microsporidia (Bart et al. 2008), Campylobacter spp. (Dudzic et al. 2016), Salmonella spp. (Haesendonck et al. 2016), and Chlamydia psittaci (Heddema et al. 2006a). Chlamydia spp. are Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacteria (Harkinezhad et al. 2009). Chlamydia psittaci is the causative organism of psittacosis (ornithosis) and C. avium is a recently identified species for which the zoonotic potential has not yet been identified (Sachse et al. 2014). The number of human cases of psittacosis in the Netherlands over the last ten years has varied between 40–80 per year (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 2017) but C. psittaci may be underdiagnosed as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia because testing for psittacosis is often not included in the routine diagnosis (Landelijke Coordinatiestructuur Infectieziektebestrijding 2007; van der Hoek et al. 2014; Spoorenberg et al. 2016).

C. psittaci is subdivided into at least nine different genotypes based on sequencing of the outer membrane protein A (OmpA) gene (Sachse et al. 2008; van Lent et al. 2012). Each genotype is associated with different hosts, for example genotype A is associated with parrots, genotype B with pigeons and some wild birds and genotype C with ducks (Radomski et al. 2016). The present genotyping system only accounts for part of the genetic diversity of C. psittaci. An extension has been proposed, which would include subgroups to genotypes A, E/B and D, and six new (provisional) genotypes to include strains that are presently not typable (Sachse et al. 2008).

Avian associated genotypes of C. psittaci can cause infection in humans and it has been suggested that non-psittacine birds are an underestimated source of infection (Heddema et al. 2006b; Radomski et al. 2016). The contribution of poultry farms to human infection has not yet been fully clarified (Hogerwerf et al. 2017; Heijne et al. 2018) and there is some evidence that contact with garden birds may contribute to zoonotic transmission (Rehn et al. 2013). Of the Dutch psittacosis patients recorded between 2008–2016, approximately 6% reported contact with wild pigeons (Heddema et al. 2015; Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 2017). In 15–25 cases each year the animal source of infection is unknown or not reported (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 2017); it is possible that some of these patients contracted psittacosis from pigeons via the urban environment.

The last survey of the prevalence of C. psittaci in feral pigeons in urban areas in the Netherlands was carried out in Amsterdam more than 10 years ago (Heddema et al. 2006a). Then, the prevalence in a total of 331 feral pigeon droppings collected at nine locations in the city averaged 5% (95% CI, 2–10%) during the late winter and 10% (95% CI, 6–16%) during the spring breeding season.

The aim of this study was to establish whether pigeon droppings in two Dutch cities (Utrecht and Haarlem) contain C. psittaci and/or C. avium, which could be a potential hazard for transmission to humans.

2. Materials and methods

In May 2017, feral pigeon ‘hot spots’ with at least five and up to more than 40 pigeons present were identified in two Dutch cities, Utrecht and Haarlem, by visual observations over two days based on the method of Buijs and van Wijnen (Buijs and van Wijnen 2001). At most of these locations food was sold, cafes were situated or the location was a park in which people fed pigeons. In one case it concerned a viaduct where the birds nested. During the succeeding 10 days fresh droppings were collected at seven hot spots in each city and frozen at −20 °C until analysis. The samples were pooled per three droppings resulting in 41 pooled samples from Utrecht and 40 pooled samples from Haarlem.

DNA isolation was performed as described earlier (Heijne et al. 2018) and tested for the presence of Chlamydia DNA with a broad range 23S Chlamydiaceae Real-Time PCR (Ehricht et al. 2006). Subsequently, positive samples were tested with a specific C. psittaci and C. avium Real-Time PCR (Pantchev et al. 2009; Zocevic et al. 2013). C. psittaci positive samples were genotyped according to the method of Heddema et al. (Heddema et al. 2015).

3. Statistical analysis

The difference between the frequencies of positive samples in the two cities were tested for significance using the two sample Z-test on the Epitools website (http://epitools.ausvet.com.au/content.php?page=home). A p-value below 0.05 was considered significant.

4. Results

The results of the PCR analysis for C. psittaci and C. avium are presented in Table 1. Overall, C. psittaci was detected in 4/81 (4.9%) and C. avium in 23/81 (28.4%) pooled samples of feral pigeon droppings. One sample from Haarlem contained both species. All C. psittaci samples belonged to genotype B.

Table 1.

Prevalences of Chlamydia psittaci and C. avium in pooled samples of feral pigeon droppings from two cities in the Netherlands.

  C. psittaci
C. avium
  No. of samples positive Percentage positive 95% CI No. of samples positive Percentage positive 95% CI
Utrecht 1/41 2.4%a 0–7.2% 15/41 36.6%b,c 21.8–51.3%
Haarlem 3/40 7.5%a,c 0–15.7% 8/40 20.0%c 7.6–32.4%

a,b,cPercentage prevalences indicated by a different letter are significantly different (p < 0.05).

The difference in the frequencies of positive pooled samples between the two cities was not significant for either species (p > 0.05). In Utrecht, C. avium was found significantly more often than C. psittaci (p < 0.0001), whereas in Haarlem the difference in prevalence between the two species was not significant (p > 0.05).

5. Discussion

In this study several pooled samples of pigeon droppings from the centre of two cities were found positive for C. psittaci genotype B and a much larger proportion of the samples was positive for C. avium.

The C. psittaci prevalence we found in Haarlem is in accordance with the range of prevalences found in pigeons in Amsterdam, namely between 5% (in February) and 10% (in May) (Heddema et al. 2006a). However, it should be noted that the present study used pooled samples from three pigeons, whereas the Amsterdam study sampled individual pigeon droppings. Prevalences from the city of Moers in Germany were found to be much higher: 46.7%–76.7% (Sachse et al. 2012). Our sampling was carried out during May, when most birds are breeding. At other times of year excretion of Chlamydiae may be lower because it is known that stress during the breeding period can stimulate excretion of Chlamydiae (European Commission 2002).

C. psittaci genotype B found here is quite usual for pigeons (Vanrompay et al. 1993). The dried droppings from feral pigeons in these two cities represent a potential source of infection with C. psittaci if they are inhaled (Harkinezhad et al. 2009). Although Chlamydia spp. are obligate intracellular bacteria, C. psittaci can survive long enough outside the body to make transmission via the environment possible (Harkinezhad et al. 2009; Szymanska-Czerwinska and Niemczuk 2016). Much is yet unclear about the uptake of C. psittaci by host cells and it has not yet been established how many Chlamydiae must be inhaled to become infected (Radomski et al. 2016).

This appears to be the first report of C. avium in feral pigeons in the Netherlands but the species has been identified retrospectively in pigeon samples in Germany between 1996–2012 (Sachse et al. 2014). C. avium has only recently been identified as a separate species and the potential for contributing to human chlamydiosis is unknown (Sachse et al. 2014).

More research is needed to determine whether action should be taken to reduce the chance of human contact with pigeon droppings and/or to treat feral pigeons to reduce carriage of C. psittaci. A more thorough diagnosis of human pneumonia cases would enable better evaluation of the source of infection and provide more information on the relative contribution of feral pigeons to human psittacosis. Sampling individual birds would provide a more accurate assessment of the C. psittaci prevalence in the city pigeon populations. It would also be interesting to evaluate whether the use of pigeon lofts in city centres to attract pigeons away from the areas where most people are (market squares and parks), has an effect on the prevalence in the birds or on the spreading of Chlamydia spp. in the environment. For example, environmental dust collectors could be used around these areas to investigate the potential spread of these bacteria in the environment, which is a likely route of transmission to humans.

Conclusion

C. psittaci and C. avium are present in droppings of feral pigeons in two Dutch cities. Human contact with contaminated pigeon droppings, either directly or by inhalation of dust from dried droppings, represents a potential hazard for public health.

Funding Statement

The analysis of the samples was funded by a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) in the Plat4m-2Bt-psittacosis project, [project number 522001 002].

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, SB, upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements

Angele Timan (UU) and Herma Buijs, Conny van Solt, and Marianne Vahl (WBVR) are thanked for their technical assistance. Alejandro Dorado-Garcia (UU) is thanked for his advice on sampling and statistics and for his critical review of the manuscript. Marc Engelsma (WBVR) is thanked for his critical review of the manuscript.

Disclosure of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bart A, Wentink-Bonnema EM, Heddema ER, Buijs J, van Gool T. 2008. Frequent occurrence of human-associated Microsporidia in fecal droppings of urban pigeons in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74:7056–7058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buijs JA, van Wijnen JH. 2001. Survey of feral rock doves (Columba livia) in Amsterdam, a bird-human association. Urban Ecosystems. 5:235–241. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dudzic A, Urban-Chmiel R, Stępień-Pyśniak D, Dec M, Puchalski A, Wernicki A. 2016. Isolation, identification and antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter strains isolated from domestic and free-living pigeons. Br Poult Sci. 57:172–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ehricht R, Slickers P, Goellner S, Hotzel H, Sachse K. 2006. Optimized DNA microarray assay allows detection and genotyping of single PCR-amplifiable target copies. Mol Cell Probes. 20:60–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission 2002. Avian chlamydiosis as a zoonotic disease and risk reduction strategies. Report of the European Commission's Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/sci-com_scah_out73_en.pdf.
  6. Haesendonck R, Rasschaert G, Martel A, Verbrugghe E, Heyndrickx M, Haesebrouck F, Pasmans F. 2016. Feral pigeons: a reservoir of zoonotic Salmonella Enteritidis strains ? Vet Microbiol. 195:101–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harkinezhad T, Geens T, Vanrompay D. 2009. Chlamydophila psittaci infections in birds: a review with emphasis on zoonotic consequences. Vet Microbiol. 135:68–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heddema ER, Ter Sluis S, Buys JA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, van Wijnen JH, Visser CE. 2006a. Prevalence of Chlamydophila psittaci in fecal droppings from feral pigeons in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 72:4423–4425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heddema ER, van Hannen EJ, Bongaerts M, Dijkstra F, ten Hove RJ, de Wever B, Vanrompay D. 2015. Typing of Chlamydia psittaci to monitor epidemiology of psittacosis and aid disease control in the Netherlands, 2008–2013. Euro Surveill. 20:pii = 21026 Available online:http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=21026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Heddema ER, van Hannen EJ, Duim B, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE, Pannekoek Y. 2006b. Genotyping of Chlamydophila psittaci in human samples. Emerg Infect Dis. 12:1989–1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Heijne M, van der Goot JA, Fijten H, van der Giessen JW, Kuijt E, Maassen CBM, van Roon A, Wit B, Koets AP, Roest HIJ. 2018. A cross sectional study on Dutch layer farms to investigate the prevalence and potential risk factors for different Chlamydia species. PLoS One. 13:e0190774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hogerwerf L, Holstege MMC, Benincà E, Dijkstra F, van der Hoek W. 2017. Temporal and spatial analysis of psittacosis in association with poultry farming in the Netherlands, 2000–2015. BMC Infect Dis. 17:519 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-12017-12608-12871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Landelijke Coordinatiestructuur Infectieziektebestrijding R 2007. Psittacose richtlijn infectieziektebestrijding [Psittacosis guideline infectious disease control]. [accessed 2018 Feb 26]. https://lci.rivm.nl/richtlijnen/psittacose. Dutch.
  14. Pantchev A, Sting R, Bauerfeind R, Tyczka J, Sachse K. 2009. New real-time PCR tests for species-specific detection of Chlamydophila psittaci and Chlamydophila abortus from tissue samples. Vet J. 181:145–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Radomski N, Einenkel R, Müller A, Knittler MR. 2016. Chlamydia–host cell interaction not only from a bird's eye view: some lessons from Chlamydia psittaci. FEBS Lett. 590:3920–3940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rehn M, Ringberg H, Runehagen A, Herrmann B, Olsen B, Petersson AC, Hjertqvist M, Kühlmann-Berenzon S, W A.. 2013. Unusual increase of psittacosis in southern Sweden linked to wild bird exposure, January to April 2013. Euro Surveill. 18:pii = 20478 Available online:http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=22047. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 2017. Staat van zoonosen 2016 [State of zoonoses 2016]. Bilthoven: Dutch. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sachse K, Kuehlewind S, Ruettger A, Schubert E, Rohde G. 2012. More than classical Chlamydia psittaci in urban pigeons. Vet Microbiol. 157:476–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sachse K, Laroucau K, Hotzel H, Schubert E, Ehricht R, Slickers P. 2008. Genotyping of Chlamydophila psittaci using a new DNA microarray assay based on sequence analysis of ompA genes. BMC Microbiol. 8:63 10.1186/1471-2180-1188-1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sachse K, Laroucau K, Riege K, Wehner S, Dilcher M, Creasy HH, Weidmann M, Myers G, Vorimore F, Vicari N, et al. . 2014. Evidence for the existence of two new members of the family Chlamydiaceae and proposal of Chlamydia avium sp. nov. and Chlamydia gallinacea sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 37:79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Spoorenberg SMC, Bos WJW, van Hannen EJ, Dijkstra F, Heddema ER, van Velzen-Blad H, Heijligenberg R, Grutters JC, de Jongh BM,Ovidius Study Group . 2016. Chlamydia psittaci: a relevant cause of community-acquired pneumonia in two Dutch hospitals. Neth J Med. 74:75–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Szymanska-Czerwinska M, Niemczuk K. 2016. Avian chlamydiosis zoonotic disease. Vector-borne Zoonotic Dis. 16:1–3 DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. van der Hoek W, van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB, Heddema ER, Notermans DW, den Boer JW, Nieuwenhuizen A, Tjon-A-Tsien AML, Dijkstra F, Meijer A. 2014. Omvang van het psittacoseprobleem bij de mens: het belang van betrouwbare diagnostiek [Extent of the psittacosis problem in humans: the importance of reliable diagnostics] Infectieziekten Bulletin. 25:45–48. Dutch. [Google Scholar]
  24. van Lent S, Piet JR, Beeckman D, van der Ende A, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Bavoil P, Myers G, Vanrompay D, Pannekoek Y. 2012. Full genome sequences of all nine Chlamydia psittaci genotype reference strains. J Bacteriol. 194:6930–6931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vanrompay D, Andersen AA, Ducatelle R, Haesenbrouck F. 1993. Serotyping of European isolates of Chlamydia psittaci from poultry and other birds. J Clin Microbiol. 31:134–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zocevic A, Vorimore F, Vicari N, Gasparini J, Jacquin L, Sachse K, Magnino S, Laroucau K. 2013. A real-time PCR assay for the detection of atypical strains of Chlamydiaceae from pigeons. PLoS One. 8:e58741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, SB, upon reasonable request.


Articles from The Veterinary Quarterly are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES