Abstract
Neuropeptides function as neuromodulators in the brain whereby they are released in a paracrine manner and activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in adjacent cells. Because neuropeptides are made in and secreted from cancer cells, then bind to cell surface receptors, they function in an autocrine manner. Bombesin (BB)-like peptides synthesized by neuroendocrine tumor small cell lung cancer (SCLC) bind to BB receptors (BBR) causing phosphatidylinositol turnover and phosphorylation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Phosphorylated ERK enters the nucleus and alters gene expression of SCLC cells, stimulating growth. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) addition to SCLC cells increases their release rate of BB-like peptides via activation of VIP receptors (VIPR), leading to activation of adenylyl cyclase and subsequent elevation of cAMP. Protein kinase A is then stimulated, leading to phosphorylation of CREB, which alters gene expression and stimulates proliferation. The growth of SCLC is inhibited by BBR and VIPR antagonists. This review will focus on how GPCRs for VIP and BB are molecular targets for early detection and treatment of cancer.
Keywords: peptide receptors, vasoactive intestinal peptide, bombesin, cancer
INTRODUCTION
Neuropeptides are biologically active in the central nervous system and periphery (1). Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a 28 amino acid peptide that enhances survival of spinal cord neurons in culture (2); VIP is neuroprotective because it causes secretion of cytokines and growth factors from astroglia (3). VIP and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide (PACAP) stimulate the growth of lung cancer cells (4,5). PACAP-27 has 67% sequence homology with VIP; however, VIP binds with high affinity to VPAC1 and VPAC2, whereas PACAP binds with high affinity to VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 (6). These receptors interact with Gs, increasing adenylyl cyclase activity and resulting in elevated cAMP. cAMP increases protein kinase (PK) A activity resulting in phosphorylation of CREB (7), followed by altered gene expression and increased proliferation. The growth of lung cancer cells is inhibited by VIPhyb, which blocks VPAC1 and VPAC2, and by PACAP (6–38), which antagonizes PAC1 (8).
Addition of VIP to lung cancer cells increases the secretion rate of bombesin (BB)-like peptides from the cells (9). BB and the structurally related gastin releasing peptide (GRP) bind with high affinity to BB2R, causing phosphatidyl inositol (PI) turnover (10). Neuromedin B (NMB), which has homology with the C-terminal of BB, binds with high affinity to the BB1R. Addition of GRP or NMB to lung cancer cells results in increased tyrosine phosphorylation of ERK (11); phosphorylated ERK then enters the nucleus and alters expression of the genes FOS and JUN, leading to growth proliferation (12). In contrast, BB1R or BB2R antagonists such as PD168368 or BW2258U89 inhibit lung cancer growth (13,14).
In this review I will focus on how G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for VIP and BB are targets for the early detection and treatment of cancer.
VIP/PACAP
VIP is derived from a 170 amino acid precursor protein (7). VPAC1, which is present in high densities (~100,000 molecules/cell) in lung cancer cells, binds VIP and PACAP with high affinity, and VIPhyb with moderate affinity (Table I). In contrast, PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 are derived from a different 176 amino acid precursor protein (6). The PACAP gene (ADCYAP1) is hypermethylated in cervical cancer [15]. PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 bind with high affinity to PAC1, VPAC1, and VPAC2, however PACAP (6–38) is an antagonist for PAC1 (16). Selective agonists for VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 are (Lys15, Arg16, Leu17) VIP1−7GRF8−27, Ro25–1553, and (Iaa1, Ala16,17, D-Lys38 (IAAD)) PACAP-38, respectively (17). Recently, small molecule PAC1 antagonists PA-8 and PA-9 were discovered (18). It remains to be determined if PA-8 or PA-9 inhibits the proliferation of cancer cells.
Table I.
Binding of VIP/PACAP-like peptides
| Addition | IC50 nM | |
|---|---|---|
| 125I-VIP binding | 125I-PACAP-27 binding | |
| PACAP-27 | 2 ± 0.4 | 3 ± 0.5 |
| VIP | 2 ± 0.5 | >1000 |
| PACAP (6–38) | > 1000 | 30 ± 4 |
| (SN)VIPhyb | 30 ± 4 | > 1000 |
| (Lys15, Arg16, Leu17)VIP(1–7)GRF(8–27) | 10 ± 2 | >1000 |
| Ro25–1553 | > 1000 | > 1000 |
| (IAAD)-PACAP-38 | 18 ± 3 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| (ANK)VIP-L2-CPT | 150 ± 20 | >1000 |
| VIP-LALA-E | 500 ± 50 | >1000 |
The IC50 (nM) to inhibit specific 125I-PACAP-27- or 125I-VIP binding to NCI-H1299 cells is indicated. The mean value ± S.D. of 3 experiments each repeated in quadruplicate is indicated. The structures of PACAP-27 and VIP, with homologies relative to PACAP-27, underlined are:
PACAP-27: His-Ser-Asp-Gly-Ile-Phe-Thr-Asp-Ser-Tyr-Ser-Arg-Tyr-Arg-Lys-Gln-Met-Ala-Val-Lys-Lys-Tyr-Leu-Ala-Ala-Val-Leu-NH2.
VIP: His-Ser-Asp-Ala-Val-Phe-Thr-Asp-Asn-Tyr-Thr-Arg-Leu-Arg-Lys-Gln-Met-Ala-Val-Lys-Lys-Tyr-Leu-Glu-Ser-Ile-Leu-Asn-NH2.
VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 are type II (secretin) GPCRs that interact with stimulatory guanine nucleotide binding proteins (Gs). VPAC1, which contains 457 amino acids, is present in high densities in bladder, breast, colon, liver, lung, pancreatic, prostate, thyroid, and uterus cancers (19, 20). VIP-Leu-Ala-Leu-Ala-ellipticine (LALA-E) binds to VPAC1 with moderate affinity and is internalized (21). LALA-E is metabolized in lysozomes and cytotoxic E is released into the cells, where it inhibits proliferation and topoisomerase II activity. Because the N-terminus of VIP is essential for biological activity, the C-terminus can be modified with various drugs. (Ala2,8,9,11,19,24,25.27, Nle17, Lys18 (ANK))VIP coupled to camptothecin (CPT) has been shown to inhibit lung cancer proliferation and topoisomerase I activity (22), thus VPAC1 is a target that can be used to deliver cytotoxic agents into cancer cells.
VPAC2, which contains 438 amino acids, is present in moderate densities in gastric, pancreatic adenocarcinomas, gastric leiomyomas, and thyroid cancers, and in sarcomas. PAC1, which contains 468 amino acids, is present in moderate densities in brain, breast, colon, lung, neuroendocrine, pancreatic, pituitary, and prostate cancers. There is approximately 50% sequence homology between VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1; however, PAC1 has splice variants (SV): addition of a 28 amino acid segment to intracellular loop (IL) 3 of PAC1null results in PAC1hip; addition of a different 28 amino acid segment results in PAC1hop; addition of both segments to PAC1null results in PAC1hiphop. PAC1 can interact with Gq, stimulating PI turnover. The order of potency to cause PI turnover is PAC1hop > PAC1null = PAC1hiphop > PAC1hip (23). The gene PAC1 is composed of 18 exons, and deletions at its N-terminus have been observed in neuroblastoma cells (24). Deletions of exons 5, 6, or 4–6 result in deletions of 7 amino acids, 21 amino acids (PAC1-short, PAC1s), or 57 amino acids (PAC1-very short; PAC1vs), respectively. PAC1s, but not PAC1vs, binds to PACAP-38 with high affinity and when cAMP is elevated (25). Deletion of 53 amino acids from the C-terminus of PAC1 impairs signal transduction and receptor desensitization (26). Site-directed mutagenesis of PAC1 has indicated that Arg416 and Ser417 are essential for its inactivation. These results indicate that PAC1 binding and signal transduction can be altered by deletions or mutations of PAC1.
Peptide GPCRs are present in both neuroendocrine (SCLC) and epithelial cancers (non-SCLC). GPCRs are present in NSCLC cells, as are receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK) such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2. Addition of 100 nM PACAP-27 or PACAP-38 to NSCLC cells significantly increases tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR and HER2 within 1 minute (27). EGFR and HER2 transactivation are inhibited upon addition of PACAP (6–38), gefitinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)), PP2 (Src inhibitor), TGF-α antibody, or GM6001 (matrix metalloprotease inhibitor (MMP) inhibitor) (Fig. 1). The activation of MMP may metabolize pro-TGF-α into TGF-α, which binds to and activates EGFR (28). In contrast, there is no known ligand for HER2; however, HER2 can form heterodimers with EGFR (activated EGFR usually forms homodimers with itself). The Ras–Raf–MEK–ERK proliferation pathway is then activated, resulting in phosphorylation of ERK; pERK then enter the nucleus and alters gene expression leading to increased proliferation. The PI3K pathway is also activated, leading to increased cellular survival. Addition of VIP to breast cancer cells increases tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR and HER2 (29).
Fig. 1.

Effect of GPCRs on RTK transactivation. GPCRs for BB and PACAP couple to Gq11 and causes metabolism of PIP2 to DAG (activates PKC) and IP3 (elevates cytosolic Ca2+). GPCRs for VIP and PACAP interact with Gs activating adenylyl cyclase and increasing cAMP. cAMP activates PKA leading to CREB phosphorylation and altered gene expression. GPCRs activate Src and MMP, resulting in the production of EGFR ligands such as TGF-α. When TGF-α binds to the EGFR, tyrosine kinase activity is increased leading to phosphorylated EGFR homodimers or EGFR–HER2 heterodimers. RTK activates the Ras–Raf–MEK–ERK pathway, leading to increased cellular proliferation. RTK also activates the PI3K–PKD–Akt–mTor pathway, leading to increased cellular survival. Phosphorylated EGFR–HER2 is dephosphorylated by protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP), which is impaired by ROS.
A surprising finding is that EGFR transactivation requires reactive oxygen species (ROS). The increase in EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation caused by PACAP is inhibited by N-acetyl cysteine (NAC is an antioxidant), Tiron (superoxide scavenger), or diphenylene iodonium (DPI). DPI inhibits the enzymes Nox and Duox that synthesize ROS. ROS oxidize Cys797 of the EGFR, increasing tyrosine kinase activity and decreasing enzymatic activity of protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTP), impairing phosphotyrosine degradation (30). Addition of PACAP to NSCLC increases ROS; this can be impaired by NAC, Tiron, or DPI. Also, DPI inhibits the proliferation of NSCLC cells.
A goal is to image cancer early when it is more amenable to treatment. VIP and PACAP can be radiolabeled to image cancer tumors. Initially, 131I-VIP was used to image tumors in colon cancer patients (31). Subsequently 64Cu-TP3982- or 18F(Arg15,21)VIP was used to image mammary tumors in mice (32,33). 99mTc-TP3982VIP has been used imaged breast tumors in five patients (34). VPAC1 has a higher density in mammary tumors relative to adjacent normal tissue (35). Because VIPhybrid has been shown to inhibit the development of mammary tumors in mice, VIP may be a promoter of carcinogenesis (36).
Deletion of the N-terminus of VIP results in VIP receptor antagonists such as VIP10–28 or neurotensin6–11VIP7–28 (VIPhybrid) (8). Subsequently (N-stearyl, Nle17)VIPhyb was developed, which was shown to bind with 100-fold high affinity than VIPhyb and to be neuroprotective (37). (SN)VIPhyb has been shown to inhibit the growth of 51 out of 56 cancer cell lines, including those derived from breast cancer, colon cancer, glioblastoma, leukemia, lung cancer, melanoma, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and renal cancer (38). (SN)VIPhyb potentiated the cytotoxicity of taxol in breast cancer and of cisplatin, doxorubicin, gemcitabine, irinotecan or vinorelbine in colon cancer (39,40); (SN)VIPhyb inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells, whereas VIP stimulated proliferation. Because VIP was detected in extracts of lung cancer cells (38), it may function as an autocrine growth factor in lung cancer.
GRP/NMB
Gastrin releasing peptide is derived from the 148 amino acid preproGRP (10). High levels of GRP (27 amino acids) are present in SCLC (41, 42). Also, SCLC has elevated levels of creatine kinase and neuron specific enolase (43). Antibodies to GRP inhibit the growth of SCLC in vitro and in animal models in vivo (44). Elevated levels of proGRP31–98 have been detected in the serum of SCLC patients (45). NMB (10 amino acids) is derived from the 121 amino acid preproNMB (10). Moderate levels of NMB are present in SCLC cells (46). GRP and NMB function as autocrine growth factors in lung cancer.
When GRP is secreted from SCLC cells it binds with high affinity to BB2R (Table II). BB2R is a type I (Rhodopsin) GPCR that has 384 amino acids and interacts with Gq, leading to PI turnover. The BB1R has 390 amino acids, whereas the orphan BB receptor subtype 3 (BRS-3) had 399 amino acids; BB1R and BRS-3 have approximately 50% sequence homology with BB2R. BB2R binds BB and GRP with high affinity whereas BB1R binds NMB with high affinity (Table II). GRP has 9 of the 10 C-terminal amino acids as does BB, whereas NMB has 7 of the same 10 amino acids as BB. BRS-3 does not bind BB, GRP, or NMB with high affinity; however, BA1 binds with high affinity to BB1R, BB2R, and BRS-3 (10). BW2258U89 is a selective peptide antagonist for BB2R, whereas PD168368 is a nonpeptide antagonist for BB1R (47). ML-18 is a nonpeptide antagonist which prefers BRS-3 over BB1R or BB2R (48).
Table II.
Binding of BB-like peptides
| Addition Ligand | IC50, nM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BB2R | BB1R | BRS-3 | |
| BB | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 150 ± 18 | >10,000 |
| GRP | 2 ± 0.3 | 190 ± 22 | > 10,000 |
| NMB | 170 ± 15 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | > 10,000 |
| PD168368 | 9000 ± 1150 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | > 10,000 |
| ML18 | 10,000 ± 1450 | >10,000 | 3,000 ± 250 |
| BW2258U89 | 10 ± 3 | >10,000 | >10,000 |
The IC50 (nM) to inhibit specific 125I-BA1 binding to NCI-H1299 cells stably transfected with BB2R, BB1R, or BRS-3 is indicated. The mean value ± S.D. of 3 experiments each repeated in quadruplicate is indicated. The structures of BB, GRP, and NMB, with sequence homologies relative to BB underlined, are:
BB: Pyr-Gln-Arg-Leu-Gly-Asn-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-Met-NH2
GRP: Ala-Pro-Val-Ser-Val-Gly-Gly-Gly-Thr-Val-Leu-Ala-Lys-Met-Tyr-Pro-Arg-Gly-Asn-His-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Leu-Met-NH2.
NMB: Gly-Asn-Leu-Trp-Ala-Thr-Gly-His-Phe-Met-NH2.
BBR agonists, but not antagonists, are internalized after binding to lung cancer cells at 37 oC. Initially, the GRP–BB2R complex is internalized into endosomes, then perinuclear vesicles and subsequently the ligand is localized to lysosomes whereas the BB2R is recycled to the plasma membrane (49). Because the C-terminal is essential for high affinity binding of BB to the BB2R, drugs can be coupled to the N-terminal of BB which are cytotoxic for cancer cells. Camptothecin-linker2 (CPT-L2)–BA1 conjugates bind with high affinity to BB1, BB2R, and BRS-3. Surprisingly, CPT-L2–BA1 conjugates bind with approximately an order of magnitude greater affinity than BA1 (Table III). This suggests that CPT may interact with additional hydrophobic sites near the BA1 binding site. Using NCI-H1299 lung cancer cells transfected with BB2R, BB1R, or BRS-3 approximately 43, 34, and 42% of the added 125I-CPT-L2–BA1 was internalized. After internalization into the lysosome, CPT is released which inhibits topoisomerase 1 (50). CPT-L2–BA1 inhibited the proliferation of breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, glioblastoma, leukemia, lung cancer, neuroblastoma, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer cell lines. BB conjugated to paclitaxel, doxorubicin, magainin, or marine toxins and siRNA-specific for BB2R are cytotoxic for cancer cells (51–56).
Table III.
Binding of BA1-like peptides
| Addition Ligand | IC50, nM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| BB2R | BB1R | BRS-3 | |
| BA-1 | 3.2 ± 0.12 | 7.4 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| CPT-L2-BA1 | 0.12 + 0.01 | 0.35 +0.03 | 0.31 + 0.08 |
The IC50 (nM) to inhibit specific 125I-BA1 binding to NCI-H1299 cells stably transfected with BB2R, BB1R, or BRS-3 is indicated. The mean value ± S.D. of 3 experiments each repeated in quadruplicate is indicated. The structures of BA1 and CPT-L2-BA1, with sequence homologies relative to BA1 underlined, are:
BA1: D-Tyr-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-β-Ala-His-Phe-Nle-NH2
CPT-L2-BA: CPT-L2-D-Ser- D-Tyr-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-β-Ala-His-Phe-Nle-NH2
BB1R, BB2R, and BRS-3 regulate transactivation of EGFR in cancer cells (57–59); the GPCR interacts with Gq causing PI turnover. The IP3 released causes elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ within seconds whereas the DAG released activated PKC. BA1 addition to NSCLC cells increases EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation within 1 min and EGFR transactivation is blocked by PP2, NAC, or GM6001 (Fig. 1). Because TGF-α is released from the NSCLC cells, EGFR transactivation is blocked by gefitinib or DPI. Also, the transactivation regulated by BB1R, BB2R, and BRS-3 is blocked by the GPCR antagonists PD168368, BW2258U89, and ML-18, respectively.
Addition of GRP or NMB to NSCLC cells increases their proliferation, which is antagonized by BW2258U89 or PD168368, respectively (13,14). Also, BW2259U89, PD168369, or ML-18 inhibit basal proliferation of NSCLC cells in vitro. Using mouse models in vivo, BW2258U89 or PD168368 inhibit xenograft growth in a cytostatic manner in that is drug administration is discontinued the tumors rapidly regrow. In contrast, gefitinib is a cytotoxic agent that causes cancer cell apoptosis in vitro and in vivo; this cytotoxicity is potentiated by PD168368 or ML-18 (48,57). The results indicate that GPCR antagonists are synergistic with gefitinib at inhibiting NSCLC proliferation.
BBRs are present in numerous cancers. BB2R are most abundant in breast, colorectal, glioblastoma, head & neck, lung, ovarian, prostate and renal cancers (58–60). BB1R is detected in intestinal carcinoids whereas BRS-3 is present in lung and renal cancers. BB1R, BB2R, and BRS-3 mRNAs were detected in 11/13 lung cancer cell lines (61). Prostate cancer tumors in patients were detected using either a 64Cu-BB6–14 (62) or 99mTc-BB2–14 analog (63). Breast cancer tumors in patients were detected using a 99mTc-RGD-BB analog (64). It remains to be determined if radiolabeled BB analogs will be useful for the early detection of cancer.
SUMMARY
GPCRs of VIP and BB are important for the growth of cancer cells. VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 activate adenylyl cyclase, leading to elevation of cAMP. cAMP-stimulated PKA leads to phosphorylation of CREB and altered gene expression. VIP and PACAP stimulate the growth of lung cancer cells; growth of NSCLC can be inhibited by VIP-cytotoxic analogs or VIPR antagonists such as VIPhyb. Radiolabeled VIP and PACAP analogs may be useful for imaging patients’ tumors. Also, PAC1 regulates PI turnover and transactivation of EGFR.
BB1R, BB2R, PAC1, and BRS-3 cause PI turnover and subsequent elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ and activation of PKC; this leads to phosphorylation of ERK and altered gene expression. NMB, GRP, and BA1 stimulate the growth of lung cancer cells, which can be inhibited by GPCR antagonists such as PD168368, BW2258U89, or ML-18. CPT-BA1 analogs are cytotoxic for cells which have BBRs. Also, BB1R, BB2R, and BRS-3 regulate the transactivation of EGFR. EGFR increases cancer proliferation through the Ras–Raf–MEK–ERK pathway and increases cellular survival through the PI3K–Akt–Tor pathway. The transactivation of EGFR is impaired by BBR antagonists and the TKI gefitinib. Gefitnib is used to treat patients with NSCLC who have EGFR mutations and have failed chemotherapy (65, 66). Our results indicate that BB1R, BB2R, and BRS-3 antagonists potentiate the cytotoxicity of gefitinib.
New ligands that interact with BBRs have been developed. Previously, BB receptor agonists were utilized to image tumors; however, better results are being obtained using antagonists that have fewer adverse effects and better pharmacokinetics (67). For example, 68Ga-sarabesin 3 binds with high affinity to prostate cancer cells and imaged prostate tumors in mice (68). Also, Bantag-1, a new BRS-3 antagonist, has been shown to inhibit lung cancer proliferation (69). Traditionally SCLC is treated with chemotherapy as well as radiation therapy, and NSCLC is treated with chemotherapy; however, the 5-year survival rate is 16%. With over 150,000 U.S. citizens dying annually from lung cancer, new therapeutic approaches are needed. Peptide GPCRs are important targets for development of new drugs for treatment of cancer patients.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author thanks Dr. R. Jensen for helpful discussions. This research is supported by the NCI of the NIH.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Said SI & Mutt V. 1970. Polypeptide with broad biological activity: Isolation from small intestine. Science 69: 1217–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brenneman DE, Westbrook GL, Fitzgerald SP, et al. 1986. Neuronal cell killing by the envelope protein of HIV and its prevention by vasoactive intestinal peptide. Nature 335: 639–642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gozes I & Brenneman DE 2000. A new concept in the pharmacology of neuroprotection. J. Mol. Neurosci 14: 61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moody TW, Walters J, Casibang M et al. 2000. VPAC1 receptors and lung cancer. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 921: 26–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Moody TW & Jensen RT. 2016. PACAP and Cancer. In “Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide-PACAP” Reglodi D & Tamas A, Eds. Basel, Springer; 795–814. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vaudry D, Falluel Morel A, Vourgault S et al. 2009. Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide and its receptors: 20 years after the discovery. Pharm. Rev 61: 283–357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harmar AJ, Fahrenkrug J, Gozes I, et al. 2012. Pharmacology and functions of receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide: IUPHAR review 1. Br. J. Pharmacol 166: 4–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moody TW, Zia F, Draoui M et al. 1993. A vasoactive intestinal peptide antagonist inhibits non-small cell lung cancer growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 4345–4349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Korman LY, Carney DN, Citron ML et al. 1986. Secretin/vasoactive intestinal peptide-stimulated secretion of bombesin/gastrin releasing peptide from human small cell carcinoma of the lung. Cancer Res 46: 1214–1218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jensen RT, Battey JF, Spindel ER et al. 2008. Mammalian bombesin receptors: Nomenclature, distribution, pharmacology, signaling and functions in normal and disease states. Pharmacol. Rev 60: 1–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moody TW, Nuche-Berenguer B, Nakamura T et al. 2016. EGFR transactivation by peptide G protein-coupled receptors in cancer. Current Drug Targets 17: 520–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Draoui M, Chung P, Park M et al. 1995. Bombesin stimulates c-fos and c-jun mRNAs in small cell lung cancer cells. Peptides 16: 289–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moody TW, Leyton J, Garcia L et al. 2003. Nonpeptide gastrin releasing peptide receptor antagonists inhibit the proliferation of lung cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol 474: 21–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moody TW, Venugopal R, Zia F et al. 1995. BW2258U89: a GRP receptor antagonist which inhibits small cell lung cancer growth. Life Sci 56: 521–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jung S, Yi L, Jeong D et al. 2011. The role of ADCYAP1, adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide 1, as a methylation biomarker for the early detection of cervical cancer. Oncol. Rep 25: 245–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moody TW, Nuche-Berenguer B & Jensen RT. 2016. VIP/PACAP and their receptors and cancer. Cur. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes 23: 38–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ramos-Alvarez I, Mantey SA, Nakamura T et al. 2015. A structure-function study of PACAP using conformationally restricted analogs: Identification of PAC1 receptor-selective PACAP agonists. Peptides 66: 26–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Takasaki I, Watanabe A, Yokai M et al. 2018. In silico screening identified novel small-molecule antagonists of PAC1 receptor. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 365: 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reubi JC, Laderach U, Waser B et al. 2000. Vasoactive intestinal peptide/pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide receptor subtypes in human tumors and their tissues of origin. Cancer Res 60: 3105–3112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tang B, Yong X, Xie R et al. 2014. Vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor based imaging and treatment of tumors. Int. J. Oncol 44: 1023–1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Moody TW, Czerwinski G, Tarasova NI et al. 2001. VIP ellipticine derivatives inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells. Life Sci 19: 1005–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moody TW, Mantey SA, Fuselier JA et al. , 2007. Vasoactive intestinal peptide-camptothecin conjugates inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer cells. Peptides 28;1883–1890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pisegna J & Wank S. 1996. Cloning and characterization of four splice variants of the human pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide receptor: Evidence for dual coupling to adenylate cyclase and phospholipase C. J. Biol. Chem 271: 17267–17274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lutz EM, Ronaldson E, Shaw P et al. 2006. Characterization of novel splice variants of the PAC1 receptor in human neuroblastoma cells: Consequences for signaling by VIP and PACAP. Mol. Cell. Neurosci 31: 193–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Usiyama M, Ikelda R, Sugawara H et al. 2007. Differential intracellular signaling through PAC1 isoforms as a result of alternative splicing in the first extracellular domain and the third intracellular loop. Mol. Pharmacol 72: 103–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lyu TM, Germano PM, Choi JK et al. 2000. Identification of an essential amino acid motif within the C terminus of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide type I receptor that is critical for signal transduction but not for receptor internalization. J Biol Chem 275: 36134–36142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moody TW, Osefo N, Nuche-Berenguer B, et al. 2012. Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide causes tyrosine phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor in lung cancer cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 34: 873–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J, Ferguson KM. 2014. The EGFR family: Not so prototypical receptor tyrosine kinase. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol 6: a020768 Doi: 10.1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Valdehita A, Bajo AM, Schally AV, et al. 2009. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) induces transactivation of EGFR and HER2 in human breast cancer cells. Mol. Cell Endocrinol 302: 41–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moody TW, Ramos-Alvarez I, & Jensen RT. 2018. Neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors as oncotargets. Front. Endocrinol 9:341: a:345. Doi:10-3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Virgolini I, Raderer M, Kurtaran A et al. 1994. Vasoactive intestinal peptide-receptor imaging for localization of intestinal adenocarcinomas and endocrine tumors. N Engl. J. Med 331: 1116–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Moody TW, Leyton J, Unsworth E et al. 1998. (Arg15, Arg21) VIP: Evaluation of biological activity and localization to breast cancer tumors. Peptides 19: 585–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thakur ML, Devadhas D, Zhang K, et al. 2010. Imaging spontaneous MMTV neu transgenic mammary tumors: Targeting metabolic activity versus genetic products. J. Nucl. Med 51: 106–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thakur ML, Marcus CS, Saeed S et al. 2000. Imaging tumors in humans with Tc-99m-VIP. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci 921: 37–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dagar S, Sekosan M, Rubinstein I et al. 2001. Detection of VIP receptors in MNU-induced breast cancer in rats: Implications for breast cancer targeting. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 65: 49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Moody TW, Dudek J, Zakowicz H et al. 2004. VIP receptor antagonists inhibit mammary carcinogenesis in C3(1)SV40T antigen mice. Life Sci 74: 345–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Moody TW, Leyton J, Coelho T et al. 1997. (Stearyl, Norleucine 17)VIP hybrid antagonizes VIP receptors on non-small cell lung cancer cells. Life Sci 61:1657–1666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moody TW, Chan D, Fahrenkrug J et al. , 2003. Neuropeptides as autocrine growth factors in cancer cells. Current Pharm. Design 9: 495–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moody TW, Leyton J, Chan D, et al. 2001. VIP receptor antagonists and chemotherapeutic drugs inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 68: 55–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gelber E, Granoth R, Fridkin M, et al. 2001. A lipophilic vasoactive intestinal peptide analog enhances the anti-proliferative effect of chemotherapeutic agents on cancer cell lines. Cancer 92: 2172–2180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Moody TW, Pert CB, Gazdar AF. et al. 1981. High levels of intracellular bombesin characterize human small cell lung carcinoma. Science 214: 1246–1248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wood SM, Wood JR, Ghatei MA, et al. 1981. Bombesin, somatostatin and neurotensin-like immunoreactivity in bronchial carcinoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 53: 1310–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Carney DN, Gazdar AF, Bepler G, et al. 1985. Establishment and identification of small cell lung cancer cell lines having classic and variant features. Cancer Res 45: 2913–2923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cuttitta F, Carney DN, Mulshine J et al. Bombesin-like peptides can function as autocrine growth factors in human small cell lung cancer. Nature 316: 823–826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yang HJ, Gu Y, Chen C, et al. , 2011. Diagnostic value of pro-gastrin-releasing peptide for small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med 49: 1039–1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Giaccone G, Battey J, Gazdar AF, et al. 1992. Neuromedin B is present in lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 52: 2732s–2736s. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gonzalez N, Mantey SA, Pradhan TK et al. 2009. Characterization of putative GRP- and NMB-receptor antagonist’s interaction with human receptors. Peptides 30: 1473–1486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moody TW, Mantey SA, Moreno P, et al. 2015. ML-18 is a non-peptide bombesin receptor subtype-3 antagonist which inhibits lung cancer growth. Peptides 64: 55–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Grady EF, Slice LW, Brant WO et al. 1995. Direct observation of endocytosis of gastrin releasing peptide and its receptor. J. Biol. Chem 270: 4603–4611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Moody TW, Sun LC, Mantey SA et al. 2006. In vitro and in vivo antitumor effects of cytotoxic camptothecin bombesin conjugates are mediated by specific interaction with cellular bombesin receptors. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 318: 1265–1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Safavy A, Raisch KP, Khazaeli MB et al. 1999. Paclitaxel derivatives for targeted therapy of cancer: Toward the development of smart taxanes. J. Med. Chem 42: 419–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Wang K, Sun X, Wang Y, et al. 2015. Breast cancer targeted chemotherapy based on doxorubicin-loaded bombesin peptide modified nanocarriers. Drug Deliv 23: 2697–2702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Moody TW, Pradhan T, Mantey SA et al. 2008. Bombesin marine toxin conjugates inhibit the growth of lung cancer cells. Life Sci 82: 855–865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu S, Yang H, Wan L et al. 2011. Enhancement of cytotoxicity of anti-microbial peptide magainin II in tumor cells by bombesin-targeted delivery. Acta Pharmacol. Sin 32: 79–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sioud M, & Mobergslien A, A. 2012. Efficient siRNA targeted delivery into cancer cells by gastrin-releasing peptides. Bioconjug. Chem 23: 1040–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hohla F & Schally AV. 2010. Targeting gastrin releasing peptide receptors: New options for therapy and diagnosis of cancer. Cell cycle 9: 1738–1741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Moody TW, Berna MJ, Mantey S et al. 2010. Neuromedin B receptors regulate EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation in lung cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol 637: 38–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Moody TW, Sancho V, di Florio A et al. 2011. Bombesin receptor subtype-3 agonists stimulate the growth of lung cancer cells and increase EGFR receptor tyrosine phosphorylation. Peptides 32: 1677–1684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Liu X, Carlise DL, Swick MC et al. 2007. Gastrin-releasing peptide activates Akt through the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway and abrogates the effect of gefitinib. Exp. Cell Res 313: 1361–1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Reubi JC, Wenger S, Schchumuckli-Maurer J et al. 2002Bombesin receptor subtypes in human cancer: Detection with the universal agonist [125I- d-Tyr6, β-Ala11, Phe13, Nle14]bombesin6–14. Clin. Cancer Res 8: 1139–1146. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Moreno P, Mantey SA, Lee SH et al. 2018. A possible target in lung cancer cells. The orphan receptor bombesin receptor subtype 3. Peptides 101: 213–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kahkonen E, Jambor I, Kemppainen J et al. 2013. In vivo imaging of prostate cancer using [68Ga]-labeled bombesin analog BAY86–7548. Clin. Cancer Res 19: 5434–5443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.DeVincentis G, Remediani S, Varvarigou AD et al. 2004. Role of 99mTc-bombesin scan in diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm 19: 81–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chen Q, Ma Q, Chen M et al. 2015. An exploratory study of 99mTc-RGD-BBN peptide scintimamography in the assessment of breast malignant lesions compared to 99mTc-3P4-RGD2. PLos One 10: e0123401 10.1371/journal.pone.0123401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC et al. , 2004. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: Correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304: 1497–1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sardella R et al. 2004. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med 350: 2129–2139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Varatto L, Jadvar H, Iagaru A 2018. Prostate cancer theranostics targeting gastrin-releasing peptide receptors. Mol. Imaging Biol 20: 501–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bakker IL, van Tiel ST, Haeck J et al. 2018. In vivo stabilized SB3, an attractive GRPR antagonist, for pre- and intra-operative imaging prostate Cancer. Mol. Imaging Biol March 19 10.1007/x11307-018-1185-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Nakamura T, Ramos-Alvarez I, Iordanskaia T et al. 2016. Molecular basis for high affinity and selectivity of peptide antagonist, Bantag-1, for the orphan BB3 receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol 115: 64–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
